Slashdot Mirror


Study Claims Human Intelligence Peaked Two To Six Millennia Ago

eldavojohn writes "Professor Gerald "Jerry" Crabtree of Stanford's Crabtree Laboratory published a paper (PDF) that has appeared in two parts in Trends in Genetics. The paper opens with a very controversial suggestion: 'I would be willing to wager that if an average citizen from Athens of 1000 BC were to appear suddenly among us, he or she would be among the brightest and most intellectually alive of our colleagues and companions.' From there, Crabtree speculates we're on the decline of human intelligence and we have been for at least a couple millennia. His argument suggests agriculture and, following from that, cities, have allowed us to break free of some environmental forces on competitive genetic mutations — a la Mike Judge's theory. However, the conclusion of the paper urges humans to keep calm and carry on, as any attempt to fix this genetic trend would almost certainly be futile and disturbing."

13 of 637 comments (clear)

  1. Intel Peak by smittyoneeach · · Score: 5, Funny

    Intel peak
    And Idiocracy streak
    Comes with beard
    You hirsute freak.
    Burma Shave

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  2. Well... by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Funny

    That explains the Kardashians.

    I was wondering about that.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      *whew*

      Now I don't feel so bad about not getting most of the jokes in Shakespeare without referring to the Cliff's notes.

      I'm *so* relieved. Sort of.

      Here's a hint: they're all sexual innuendo or fart jokes.

  3. Easy... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. Find the link between the genotype and intelligence.

    2. Sequence a lot of old bones.

    3. Sequence a lot of living people.

    4. Profit...?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  4. yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    *looks at this comment*

    Yes. Yes it did.

  5. This may be the answer to Fermi paradox. by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Civilization rises to the point where television is invented. Then it collapses.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  6. Re:Actually by David+Chappell · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, no, he'd sound like somebody who spoke Ancient Greek, which I have not even the slightest passing familiarity with.

    I'd almost be tempted to call him a barbarian.

    Oddly enough, the original meaning of barbarian was "someone who does not speak Greek". So, he would be very puzzled.

  7. Re:Terrible, wretched, no good science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why are you posting DCMA bait? Here's a link you should check out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use

  8. Re:no by pastafazou · · Score: 4, Funny

    yes, just like drinking alcohol has resulted in brains that are better able to function when exposed to it. In fact, the more I drink, the smarter I become!

  9. Re:no by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    I get the feeling that the scientist who did this study is single and cannot get a girlfriend. Lets try to make people panic so girls will date Nerds as their civic duties.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  10. Re:no by Sulphur · · Score: 2, Funny

    It would also not help. Most mental deficiencies are caused by environmental factors, not heredity. Problems in childbirth and drug (especially alcohol) use are by far the most common causes of mental retardation.

    We are not talking about mental retardation from prenatal trauma here. We are talking about the general IQ level of those who have fully functioning non-retarded brains.

    Selective pressure in favor of a certain trait results in a population with more of that trait. This is like, really obvious stuff from chapter 1 of Evolution 101. It is a well-understood and widely accepted phenomena. How do you think humans developed higher IQ than the other primates?

    Teachers' Unions?

  11. Re:no by LordLimecat · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, I just had a great idea for a reality TV show.

  12. Re: zeNo by neoshroom · · Score: 4, Funny

    Zeno's Paradox is about 98% of what it takes to invent differential calculus.

    Sure, but the problem is that last 2% can never be reached, because there are an infinite amount of half-ways in the way.

    --
    Big apple, new Yorik, undig it, something's unrotting in Edenmark.