Slashdot Mirror


Band Uses Nuclear Isotopes To Make Music

Velcroman1 writes "Every second in your body, thousands of tiny isotopes are bursting with radioactive decay. And, all around you, imperceptible gamma rays explode in a brilliant but invisible lightshow. And they've just formed a live band. Yes, you read that correctly. But it's all for science: The Radioactive Orchestra 2.0 is part of a Swedish project to help us understand how low-energy radiation works, by showing the energy patterns of nuclear isotopes. Swedish musician Kristofer Hagbard conceived of the orchestra about a year ago and released an album last spring, but the new 2.0 version of 'the band' allows him to perform live in front of an audience. 'This can be looked at as a piano for high energy photons, so every detection gives us a note,' Hagbard said. 'The musical instrument is as good as the gamma spectrometer we are using.'"

24 of 37 comments (clear)

  1. Great Bands by infidel_heathen · · Score: 5, Funny

    All great bands are highly energetic, yet their halflives are so short.

    1. Re:Great Bands by TheLink · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They should do a gig in Fukushima then.

      --
  2. A must have for air travel now by Lucas123 · · Score: 3, Funny

    A pair of Bose isotope isolating headphones

    1. Re:A must have for air travel now by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      A pair of Bose isotope isolating headphones

      But if it's beta rays you're worried about, you need the Fermi headphones. Bose headphones are not going to protect you.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:A must have for air travel now by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      I prefer the Fermi anyways; the Bose have issues with condensation

  3. Kraftwerk Radioactivity by joelsherrill · · Score: 4, Informative
  4. Misleading Title by FriendlyStatistician · · Score: 4, Funny

    Should be "Band Uses Nuclear Isotopes to Make 'Music'."

    1. Re:Misleading Title by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

      At least it's better than Dubstep.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
  5. Music Categorization by odysseus_complex · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think this takes the concept of "heavy metal" music a little too far, don't you think?

    1. Re:Music Categorization by HPHatecraft · · Score: 1

      elements with the shortest half-life tend to be light... :) Hey, we could call our band "Lead Zepplin. Yeah!

    2. Re:Music Categorization by realsilly · · Score: 1

      Or Nuke-Pop genre.

      --
      Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
  6. Prior art.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    High energy protons by Juno Reactor
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeD-hpqaDfk

  7. Nuke Rap by bit+trollent · · Score: 2

    This kind of music encourages teens to enrich uranium. Just look a these lyrics.

    "Topin' all night like a motherfucking physicist.

    Now every third world arab nation in the world wanna get with this."

    Topin' and Freakin'

  8. I have monster cables... by dnahelicase · · Score: 2

    They isolate any rogue gamma radiation or radioactive decay and line up the charges so I only receive the purest electrons...

  9. Music truly for the Atomic Age by DiscountBorg(TM) · · Score: 1

    Some of the more abstract tracks remind me a lot of music from the post WWII era! (Think forbidden planet, etc)

    --
    "The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." George Bernard Shaw
  10. pure hype by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    showing the energy patterns

    A good musician can create something resembling music with just about anything. I remember Steve Allen doing it with a picture of birds sitting on power lines. But claiming there are "energy patterns" in the mist random process in nature is just, purring it kindly, B.S.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  11. Re:Slashdot is for uneducated sociopaths by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

    And that's not all! Instead of being a way to classify atoms that have a given combination of protons and neutrons, isotopes are now the actual atoms themselves! This, friends, is truly the premium form of misused scientific terminology. Nothing like synecdoche to start off your morning. (And by synecdoche, I mean a cup of synecdoche, by which I mean...)

    Anyway, all you've really proven is that the submission sucks, not that it reflects on the viewers. We're very proud of our complaints about poor editing, you know that.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  12. Every great band did that. by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just by smoking a cigarette, you inhale radioactive Polonium isotope 210.

    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=radioactive-smoke

  13. Roygbiv by kencurry · · Score: 1

    From TFA link:

    Tim Lundström, a physicist at a Swedish nuclear safety and training organization called KSU, told FoxNews.com that the radioactive orchestra is a good way to represent nuclear energy because it correlates so accurately to what we know about radioactive material. Lower energy beams produce colors like blue or green whereas higher level radioactive materials produce red tones.

    Shouldn't red be lower energy etc? (I think this is cool stuff, just nit-picking with the physicist...)

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
  14. TL;DL by hatten · · Score: 1

    To skip the talking and jump right to the "music", go to 11:30.

  15. Prior Art by srussia · · Score: 1
    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
  16. Re:Slashdot is for uneducated sociopaths by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    It is low energy. At least, in the same way that your microwave oven is high energy.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  17. What photon detector are they using? by 0x537461746943 · · Score: 1

    I have been scouring the internet and can't seem to find a detector that looks like the end of that device. Anyone know? I am sure it is outside my price range though.

    1. Re:What photon detector are they using? by we1rd0 · · Score: 1

      From the looks I would guess at some scintillator (with a photomultiplier for readout, see here for first details: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scintillator) These are usually custom made (and/or can be assembled/changed/... easily) so that the exact shape is not necessarily commercially available in bulk, but this should not matter for such an application. I would estimate 1-1.5k $ for the scintillator + PMT + the necessary High Voltage supply (another couple hundred bucks). PMT typically output small pulses (on the order 100mV) which you have to detect a flash ADC or similar will easily cost the same once more.. and then you still lack the Macbook ;-) so nothing for the weekend project.