Slashdot Mirror


Vegetative State Man 'Talks' By Brain Scan

c0lo writes "'Severely brain-injured Scott Routley hasn't spoken in 12 years. None of his physical assessments since then have shown any sign of awareness, or ability to communicate, thus being diagnosed as vegetative (vegetative patients emerge from a coma into a condition where they have periods awake, with their eyes open, but have no perception of themselves or the outside world).' Scott Routley was asked questions while having his brain activity scanned in an fMRI machine. British neuroscientist Prof Adrian Owen said Mr Routley was clearly not vegetative. 'Scott has been able to show he has a conscious, thinking mind. We have scanned him several times and his pattern of brain activity shows he is clearly choosing to answer our questions. We believe he knows who and where he is.' As a consequence, medical textbooks would need to be updated to include Prof Owen's techniques, because only observational assessments (as opposed to using mind-readers) of Mr. Routley have continued to suggest he is vegetative. Functional MRI machines are expensive (up to $2 million), but it's quite possible that a portable high-end EEG machine, costing about $75,000, can be used at a patient's bedside. Phillip K. Dick's world is one step closer."

44 of 202 comments (clear)

  1. I'm loath to ask: by newcastlejon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Will they ask him if he wants to die?

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    1. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Antipater · · Score: 5, Funny

      *beep beep* "Yes, yes? I knew it. Euthanize him, boys!"

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    2. Re:I'm loath to ask: by pwizard2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Being kept alive in that condition (where you are conscious but are essentially trapped in your own body) is unimaginably cruel. I for one would rather die.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    3. Re:I'm loath to ask: by geekoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not me. Keep me going. I would rather be bored then dead. They might be able to cure me someday.

      In the mean time please leave the TV on. maybe get an EKG machine that lets me interface with a computer.

      You sir, are a quitter.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:I'm loath to ask: by steviesteveo12 · · Score: 2

      I'm uncomfortably reminded of the Facilitated Communication scam, except replacing holding their hand with an fMRI scanner. I'd hope no one dies based on cutting edge research into interpreting brain scans.

    5. Re:I'm loath to ask: by pwizard2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're assuming quite a bit. What if the parts of your brain that process visual/audio data are damaged and don't work anymore? Just how useful would TV be in that situation? Think about it... you would be trapped in a dark abyss entirely inside your head, unable to see or hear any stimulus. Even if people come to visit you, you would never know because you couldn't see or hear them. Yes, death would be preferable.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    6. Re:I'm loath to ask: by houghi · · Score: 4, Funny

      We have put MTV on for you. Are you happy now or would you rather die?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    7. Re:I'm loath to ask: by BitterOak · · Score: 2

      In the mean time please leave the TV on.

      Depending on what channel it's set to, that could be a fate far worse than death.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    8. Re:I'm loath to ask: by adolf · · Score: 2

      Yes, death would be preferable.

      Perhaps. But would you be able to tell the difference?

    9. Re:I'm loath to ask: by evilviper · · Score: 2

      What if the parts of your brain that process visual/audio data are damaged and don't work anymore?

      That isn't the case for this man. He is apparently acquiring information from after his accident (unless this experiment is biased and the conclusions are all crap, but that's a different discussion).

      you would be trapped in a dark abyss entirely inside your head, unable to see or hear any stimulus

      Purgatory? Solitary confinement? Depending on your philosophy, a few years of that may be preferable to death. And if there is any HOPE of a cure, a few years of complete isolation may not be horrendous. If you've had a decently long life, you may have lots to think about...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:I'm loath to ask: by mariox19 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You mean like being a patient such as Mr. Routley and having your organs harvested? Generally, donors are not given pain medication, only tranquilizers to keep their bodies from flinching, since it's assumed that people in such a state are "gone." I brought this up to my brother, the anesthesiologist, when this story was in the news a few months back, and he insisted that there was no need for anesthesia. That's the consensus of the medical community.

      That puts us a step ahead of vivisection—but only barely.

      --

      quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

    11. Re:I'm loath to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Think about it... you would be trapped in a dark abyss entirely inside your head

      Happened to me once. So I separated the darkness from the light. And the darkness I called night and the light I called day. After that I made up all kinds of stuff. Useless but entertaining.

    12. Re:I'm loath to ask: by hene · · Score: 2

      I spend lots of time in meditation. When my busy mind gets still it's not terrible at all, actually quite enjoyable state. So it is pretty much depends how you want to experience it. If you freak out it might be terrible, but if you are able to accept it.. it might not be so cruel at all.

    13. Re:I'm loath to ask: by hene · · Score: 2

      So you rather die then spend time with yourself and with your imagination? I don't know what level of brain activity works here, but I would like to twist this view point to the angle where this state is much more close the living then most people do in their life time. Everybody now days runs away from experiencing life itself doing anything but have to spend time with their own mind.

    14. Re:I'm loath to ask: by i · · Score: 2

      A donor would be brain-dead (AFAIK) which means irreversible loss of activity in the brain. And that means there is no receiver of any pain signals. (Comparable to a head amputation.)

      --
      Mundus Vult Decipi
  2. Sounds like a match. by olsmeister · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sounds like a great use for something like this. But, have fun getting insurance to cover it...

  3. EEG == $75k? by sgt+scrub · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How does one charge $75,000 bucks for something that can be found in the land of open source?

    http://openeeg.sourceforge.net/buildeeg/

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:EEG == $75k? by suutar · · Score: 2

      Because one can get that much from hospitals that can't use the open source one because it's not certified?

    2. Re:EEG == $75k? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Insightful
      75K seems a good amount for taking something that could be done in Open Source and making it safe, reliable, and repeatably measurable for use in a hospital.

      Sure, we can get these things to cost $5000 like a good hearing aid. But I'm not sure that version is going to be used to make the final assessment of whether there is a living person in a locked-in patient or not.

    3. Re:EEG == $75k? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Once again,. someon on /. has no clue baout how the world actually wqorks.

      They need to pay people.
      It needs to get certified.
      Maintained
      Tested regularly,
      be durable.
      make a profit.

      So, yeah shit cost money and time.
      Now, if I had someone I knew in that state and I couldn't get one through the hospital, I would build on to bring with me. It wouldn't be a medical device.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  4. Hope for treating "Locked-in" Syndrome by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If even a small percentage of people suffering with "Locked-in" Syndrome are reachable it will be a major win. Think "Johnny Got His Gun" or "The Diving Bell And The Butterfly" for cinematic examples of "Locked-in" Syndrome.

    --
    I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
  5. Re:Must be boring. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure that I read a book about that, and the title was "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream"...

  6. Re:Must be boring. by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2

    That was a computer, though, wasn't it? Harlan Ellison? Maybe I'm thinking of something else.

    The story depressed the hell out of me, I and feel really bad for the guy. I'd be trying to wire him up to the TV remote or a web browser next just so he can get some entertainment.

  7. Morse Code by Capt.Albatross · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While watching "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly", it occurred to me that knowing morse code would give you the best chance of communicating from this frightening state.

  8. London, Ontario by Rohobian · · Score: 2

    Big win for the London, Ontario area, not to mention UWO, who also recently announced good news on HIV vaccine tests.

  9. Re:Must be boring. by todrules · · Score: 3

    Also a song - "One," by Metallica.

  10. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by Xacid · · Score: 2

    But is it to release you from the burden or them? Seems like a question that can be asked of them now.

  11. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  12. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not even sure why they let vegetative people live if they've been in that condition for so long. If they're truly unconscious then they're already gone, and if they're not you definitely want to kill them. It makes me sick that we even *potentially* leave people in such a state for so long.

    You cannot say that someone else should die, without asking them, simply because **you** imagine you would want to in that situation. That would violate just about every single code of ethics imaginable. The situation changes a bit if they have previously expressed a desire not to be kept alive in such a situation (which is often followed, although mind you even in that case, it's hard to know if they really meant it, since they had no prior experience with which to make an educated judgment), but to presume that another should die because of what you think or want is one of the grossest violations of human rights possible.

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  13. Re:Must be boring. by meta-monkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://pub.psi.cc/ihnmaims.txt

    Maybe if you're considering Mr. Routely, the man in the article, to be similar to the AM computer from the story. The human protagonist has that thought ("I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream") at the end of the story, but I think what makes that story great was that it really describes the computer. It becomes intelligent, butit's just a world-spanning computer. It has consciousness, but no real purpose, drive or desires, and that's what drives it mad. I find that whole concept really intriguing, because we see a lot of "machines taking over the world" stories in which humans are eliminated because they're considered "inefficient" or simply because the cold, calculating machine sees no value in human life as the machines have no emotions (skynet), but in IHNMAIMS, the computer very much has emotions, it's just that it's hateful. So, instead of humans being eliminated by a machine of cold, cruel logic, they're eliminated and/or tortured by a sadistic machine driven by hatred. Really interesting.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  14. fMRI has problems by capedgirardeau · · Score: 5, Interesting

    fMRI has problems and is very subject to interpretation, misuse and manipulation.

    For example the now classic dead fish fMRI tests:
    http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/09/fmrisalmon/

    I am very skeptical of this until it has been repeated, tested and evaluated in other settings by different researchers.

    For some reason when reading the story, it really reminded me of "facilitated communication" which is a terrible, cruel scam non-communicative and vegetative or near vegetative state people are subject to. I realize this is different, but really not very different.

    --
    Wax on, wax off baby!
    1. Re:fMRI has problems by Chuckstar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You also have to be careful when thinking about this due to the different conditions that could all be lumped into "vegetative states".

      Someone with localized damage could appear vegetative, but really just be "locked in". In other words, they could have a largely intact brain, except for key regions blocking movement/communication. They would appear vegetative, but actually be able to react in ways that would show up in fMRI. This research could prove to be valid in such cases.

      Someone like Teri Shiavo, though, is a whole different story. Her brain was so damaged that most of it was simply gone (damaged material is cleared out by the immune system). She mostly had a big empty cavity in her head filled with fluid. It's unlikely that fMRI would show any response in such a case. And even if it did, with that much damage it would be impossible to make any guess as to what that activity might mean.

  15. Kill me, please by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a legal document that tells my family to pull the plug in such a case. I don't care who thinks I'm a "quitter".

    1. Re:Kill me, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've had trauma surgeons tell me that advance directives/living wills are very frequently overridden by family.

      It makes sense, in a degenerate way: the docs and the hospital have better things to do than sue families to get them to follow their invalid family member's advance directive document. It would be a PR disaster, and it's just easier to leave a patient as a full code on a vent rather than fighting a family willing to attempt to get an injunction from a court.

      Basically, what I was told was that these help to absolve your power of attorney of any guilty feelings they might have about terminating care and letting you die. So, it's important that your PoA is on board with your wishes, otherwise they won't be happening while you're incapacitated (and if you're *not* incapacitated then you don't need a living will in order to execute your wishes). Don't get me wrong—I have a notarized living will for which I and my PoA carry a digital copy on our USB keychain drives. I'm just saying that the documents aren't a panacea.

      Also, it's tough to be a doctor. If a patient is resuscitated after their DNR is on file then performing CPR, etc, is legally considered assault (or battery). I've seen a department in damage control mode after a resident failed to let a patient die (ie. the resident successfully resuscitated a DNR patient and wasn't aware of the DNR order). Can end up charged with malpractice or worse...

  16. False positive? by xlsior · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just because they got results, doesn't mean that there's any conscious thought going on.

    Case in point: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/09/fmrisalmon/
    "So, as the fish sat in the scanner, they showed it “a series of photographs depicting human individuals in social situations.” To maintain the rigor of the protocol (and perhaps because it was hilarious), the salmon, just like a human test subject, “was asked to determine what emotion the individual in the photo must have been experiencing.”

    The salmon, as Bennett’s poster on the test dryly notes, “was not alive at the time of scanning.”

    If that were all that had occurred, the salmon scanning would simply live on in Dartmouth lore as a “crowning achievement in terms of ridiculous objects to scan.” But the fish had a surprise in store. When they got around to analyzing the voxel (think: 3-D or “volumetric” pixel) data, the voxels representing the area where the salmon’s tiny brain sat showed evidence of activity. In the fMRI scan, it looked like the dead salmon was actually thinking about the pictures it had been shown."

  17. Re:Must be boring. by redneckmother · · Score: 2

    Must be pretty boring to be conscious but unable to do anything at all.

    Shades of _Johnny Got His Gun_, by Dalton Trumbo.

  18. My dad's brain damage and amazing recovery by phantomlord · · Score: 5, Informative

    Back in 1998, my dad had a brain aneurysm (his second, the first was a ruptured brain aneurysm when he was a teenager that he survived without any impairment othe than an aneurysm clip on his left carotid arterty) that required a coil embolization (a new technique at the time, he was the 7th patient they had done at this hospital). After placing the coils, a clot broke free resulting in a stroke. He was recovering well and was almost fully functional, when two weeks later when he developed hydrocephalus, so they placed a ventriculostomy to relieve the pressure. Two days after that while doing a CT to check the placement of the catheter, they found an infection in his brain stem (later to also note that he had developed a left ear infection), which required a craniotomy. That resulted in him being in a coma and on a ventilator.

    The only directive he had ever given me was that he didn't want to live on a machine... That ventilator weighed heavily on me. The doctors told me that he had three days to come out of his coma or he probably never would. In an effort to try to get any type of response out of him, they would twist his nipples so hard that they bled. My sister's 14th birthday was on day 5 of the affair and I decided that there was a difference between living on a machine and recovering from a serious incident for a few days. If he didn't come out of the coma, I would pull him off the ventilator on day 7 - just in case he hung on, I didn't want him to die on my sister's birthday.
    He woke up on day 3 and ended up on the ventilator for about a week. It was that incident that finalized his brain damage, Essentially, he was a 41 year old that lost the entire top half of the right side of his brain. He wasn't moving his left side at all, he wasn't able to talk well, his short term memory was totally gone, he couldn't even sit up without falling over and could barely swallow a pureed and thickened diet. After 2.5 months of trying to get him stable enough to leave, he went to rehab where he stayed for another 2.5 months.

    After rehab, he came home to live with me... and he regained almost all of his mental faculties. He could walk with assistance, having regained most of the major muscle control in his left leg, but his primary long term deficits were the loss of his left arm and the neglect of the left side of his field of vision. The kicker? He remembers every word that was said to him while he was in a coma. The doctors can't believe that the person they see corresponds to the brain imaging that they're looking at... while they expect that amount of plasticity in a younger individual, it's extremely rare in an adult. Needless to say, he was pretty happy with his life, though he faced the usual depression and whatnot that comes with such a significant change in his lifestyle.

    Fast forward to this year... he had mastoiditis in the same ear as that infection back in 1998 and took two courses of antibiotics to get rid of it. Five months later, he went blind and started exhibiting stroke symptoms. I took him to the hospital and he was diagnosed with an abscess in his occiptal lobe (visual cortex) that penetrated the ventricles, causing ventriculits. To do imaging and a lumbar puncture, they ended up needing to sedate him and he ended up on a ventilator. Broad spectrum antibiotics (flagyl, vancomycin, and ceftriaxone) were started that night. A week in, he was, once again, no longer responding to pain.

    Once again, I was stuck with confronting my father being on a ventilator and essentially in a coma. Once again, the doctors came through telling me that the odds of survival weren't very good and that, given the previous brain damage to the other side of his brain, now that both sides were involved and with little reserve brain left, he almost certainly wouldn't recover.... but there was still a chance that, if I stopped treatment, he could survive, though it wasn't likely. I decided that my dad would want the only option that gave him any chance of an outcome worse than death, so I co

    --
    Don't leave your mind so open that your brain falls out. Don't close it so much that you cut off the blood.
  19. Re:Must be boring. by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And I'm sure if the guy could communicate more than yes/no he would be saying "Kill me" over and over and over.

    this to me is the truly scary part of technology, how they can make someone a "head in a box" for all intents and purposes and leave you going for years trapped in some grey nothing (that is what one girl who awakened from a coma described it as, a grey room with nothing, no sounds, no doors, just a grey room...trapped forever with no concept of time) with no way to escape...fuck that, put a bullet in my brain, smother me with a pillow, OD me on morphine, don't leave me trapped in some grey hell for eternity.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  20. Re:Not the first time by nbauman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, the BBC gave a link to the NEJM article. What have they done with those 5 patients since then?

    http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0905370
    Willful Modulation of Brain Activity in Disorders of Consciousness
    Martin M. Monti, Ph.D., Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse, M.Sc., Martin R. Coleman, Ph.D., Melanie Boly, M.D., John D. Pickard, F.R.C.S., F.Med.Sci., Luaba Tshibanda, M.D., Adrian M. Owen, Ph.D., and Steven Laureys, M.D., Ph.D.
    N Engl J Med 2010; 362:579-589
    February 18, 2010
    DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905370

    Results

    Of the 54 patients enrolled in the study, 5 were able to willfully modulate their brain activity. In three of these patients, additional bedside testing revealed some sign of awareness, but in the other two patients, no voluntary behavior could be detected by means of clinical assessment. One patient was able to use our technique to answer yes or no to questions during functional MRI; however, it remained impossible to establish any form of communication at the bedside.

    Conclusions

    These results show that a small proportion of patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state have brain activation reflecting some awareness and cognition. Careful clinical examination will result in reclassification of the state of consciousness in some of these patients. This technique may be useful in establishing basic communication with patients who appear to be unresponsive.

  21. Re:Must be boring. by migloo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "And I'm sure if the guy could communicate more than yes/no he would be saying "Kill me""

    Well, he could answer "yes" to the question "do you want us to kill you?",
    and "no" to the question "do you want to live a little longer?".

    Locked-in syndrome is to me the most terrifying end I can conceive.

  22. Re:Must be boring. by Krneki · · Score: 2

    Obligatory South Park joke

    Doctor: Hi Bob, I have a question for you, do you want us to terminate your life? One blip for yes, two blips for no.
    Bob: Blip blip
    Doctor: Double yes. Thanks Bob, see ya tomorrow.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  23. And the movie is from a book by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

    Book -> Movie -> Song

    Oh and the concept is hardly original because the book was inspired by reading of the Prince of Wales visiting a real life soldier who had been similarly wounded.

    Reality->Book -> Movie -> Song

    Gosh, it is almost as if people get inspiration from other people. THIEFS!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  24. Quality of live is relative by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

    People say easily "I would want to die if I was like that" but when you are like that... quality of life is not hard set. When you get older, you know you are going downhill one way or another. Ask a youngster who says he rather be dead then in a wheelchair how he feels about a walker. To most young people, old age is a horror but when you get there, you find that there is more to live then perfect health. Would you want to see your grandchild even if both of you were in diapers? That is real life.

    I can respect people who say "enough" and wish to die but until you are there, you cannot tell and you cannot speak for someone else. I had to sit by twice as someone died knowing that resuscitation was pointless and unwanted and I could see it was but I wanted them with me longer and people don't die easily even if they want it to end.

    Until you are there, you just can't talk about it. And you can't make others understand because nobody wants to truly consider death. And I can't blame them.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  25. Re:Just kill them all for the love of god by firewrought · · Score: 2

    You cannot say that someone else should die, without asking them, simply because **you** imagine you would want to in that situation. That would violate just about every single code of ethics imaginable.

    Actually, one could argue it's supported by the moral codes of most religions, as they all tend to feature some form of reciprocity. Of course, this would be a simplistic argument since any one religion you look at will have other principals, philosophies, and fads affecting how this gets interpreted and applied.

    Personally, while I think the Golden Rule has significant weaknesses as a moral guideline, I think it can be helpful in situations like this where you don't have the ability to communicate with the other person. Even if you feel uncomfortable answering the death question (as we all should), someone who is exercising power-of-attorney is going to have to use their own reactions to a judge/make guesses about the other person's thoughts and desires in how to deal with a specific situation.

    --
    -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction