Slashdot Mirror


Volcano May Have Killed Off New Bioluminescent Cockroach

terrancem writes "A newly discovered light-producing cockroach, Lucihormetica luckae, may have already been driven to extinction by a volcanic eruption in Ecuador. The species, only formally described by scientists this year, hasn't been spotted since the Tungurahua Volcano erupted in July 2010. The new species was notable because it represented the only known case of mimicry by bioluminescence in a land animal. Like a venomless king snake beating its tail to copy the unmistakable warning of a rattlesnake, Lucihormetica luckae's bioluminescent patterns are nearly identical to the poisonous click beetle, with which it shares (or shared) its habitat."

108 comments

  1. No true cockroach... by srussia · · Score: 5, Funny

    could be killed off by a puny volcano!

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
    1. Re:No true cockroach... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too right. They've probably just temporarily switched off their lights to go into hide mode.

    2. Re:No true cockroach... by rvw · · Score: 1

      could be killed off by a puny volcano!

      They probably have set it off themselves.

    3. Re:No true cockroach... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Doesn't sound like they were so luckae... *rimshot*

    4. Re:No true cockroach... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't that the name of Ernest P. Worrell's dog?

    5. Re:No true cockroach... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They Look Like Rocks...Possess A High Intelligence...Have No Eyes...And Eat Ashes...They Travel In Your Car Exhaust...They Make Fire...They Kill.

    6. Re:No true cockroach... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ernest's first dog was "Shorty" and his second dog was "Rimshot". I think you have in mind the old missing dog flyer:
      Missing: One-eyed, three legged dog. No tail, recently castrated, answers to the name "Lucky".

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    7. Re:No true cockroach... by DaemonDan · · Score: 1

      Seriously. I always assumed that at least cockroaches would survive the nuclear winter, but if they can't even handle a volcano...

      --
      Enjoy post-apocalyptic and singularity science fiction? Check out www.demonarchives.com, a new online graphic-novel.
    8. Re:No true cockroach... by Dishevel · · Score: 0

      OMG. A species driven to extinction!?
      We must remove man from this planet. Wait.
      It was not man that caused the extinction?
      Next you are going to tell me that man is only responsible for a tiny fraction of the bad shit that goes down.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    9. Re:No true cockroach... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      You have slain your strawman with skill. But if you want to look like you're actually a reasonable person instead of a paranoid partisan prone to hyperbole, you should actually wait for someone to make an absurd argument before you refute it.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    10. Re:No true cockroach... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha, you think humanity is completely incapable of affecting the world in even the most insignificant ways? How foolish of you.

      This straw man stuff is great..! Incidentally it is vaguely depressing how confident I can be of your politics/worldview after your rant.

    11. Re:No true cockroach... by flyneye · · Score: 1

      No! I really do mean roaches. Besides Pigs, I probably hate roaches more than any other living thing. My parents didn't keep a clean house and I had to grow up with them.EVERYWHERE! In the food, in my bed, in my clothing. Every 3 months like clockwork I use a bulb syringe to distribute boric acid based roachicide to every crack and crevice of the house. Every 2 weeks I run the water HOT down the drain then pour half a gallon of Bleach down the drain. I haven't seen a roach in decades where I live.
              I have lived in a "hood" and battled the bastards and won my territory, but neighbors (lazy type of no particular race) mostly don't care and accept roaches as part of their lives. So using my above mentioned regime, I at least held the bastards off, till I could move.
                Races aren't a problem, people who espouse cultures with negative trends and avoid common responsibilities, black, white, brown, yellow or green are the real definition of Nigger as taught to me in a U.S. high school. Nothing to do with this post except to out the A/C as one as well. Keep your filthy negative mod points to yourself!

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    12. Re:No true cockroach... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. It depresses me that some AC is stupid enough to believe that my "Worldview" can be accurately pegged in one rant that you failed to even comprehend.

      you think humanity is completely incapable of affecting the world in even the most insignificant ways?

      Now a section from what you were replying to.

      Next you are going to tell me that man is only responsible for a tiny fraction of the bad shit that goes down.

      Which points to the fact that I believe that "a tiny fraction" of the extinctions and climate changes are mans fault.

      Are you a cop with a GED failing at going to night school so you can one day become a Lt? Taking out your failures on skaters and pot smokers?
      Feeling that world does not in fact give you the respect you deserve?

      Ahh.
       

  2. Fireflies? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 2

    I thought there were certain species of fireflies that mimicked the patterns of other sub-species to lure unsuspecting victim fireflies to eat. Is there some special reason this doesn't count?

    1. Re:Fireflies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there some special reason this doesn't count?

      The lack of source.

    2. Re:Fireflies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought there were certain species of fireflies that mimicked the patterns of other sub-species to lure unsuspecting victim fireflies to eat. Is there some special reason this doesn't count?

      Fireflies aren't a land animal.

    3. Re:Fireflies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are insects animals?

    4. Re:Fireflies? by meglon · · Score: 2
      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    5. Re:Fireflies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought there were certain species of fireflies that mimicked the patterns of other sub-species to lure unsuspecting victim fireflies to eat. Is there some special reason this doesn't count?

      Fireflies aren't a land animal.

      A mighty seagoing beastie they be!

    6. Re:Fireflies? by Sique · · Score: 2

      They are land animals. They breed on land, they develop on land, only in their last phase of life (the imago state), they fly. And still then they land occasionally.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    7. Re:Fireflies? by fldsofglry · · Score: 2

      Yes, there are fireflies that mimic other fireflies in order to eat them:
      http://bioweb.uwlax.edu/bio203/2011/smith_ash2/nutrition.htm
      And yes, I would consider fireflies land animals, because they spend most of their lives on the ground as larvae:
      http://www.bio.davidson.edu/people/midorcas/animalphysiology/websites/2006/cahermes/larvae.htm

    8. Re:Fireflies? by gagol · · Score: 1

      Maybe they (original authors) meant to say only to mimic on land?

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    9. Re:Fireflies? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      I thought of that, but It compares beetles, of which fireflies are in the same family.

    10. Re:Fireflies? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      Fireflies are beetles, which the article already uses as a comparison.

    11. Re:Fireflies? by cusco · · Score: 1

      The fireflies are mimicking other related species of firefly. The roach is mimicking an entirely different animal. The summary sucks, haven't had time to RTFA yet.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    12. Re:Fireflies? by binarstu · · Score: 1

      The responses to this indicate a fair bit of confusion.

      First, yes, there are fireflies that mimic other fireflies. But the mimicry is not among sub-species, as stated by the parent. Rather, females from one genus mimic males of another. Also, fireflies are considered terrestrial animals, even though they can fly. So, this is a clearly a case of bioluminescent mimicry, and the article summary was wrong to state that the cockroach was the "only known case of mimicry by bioluminescence in a land animal."

      What the summary should have said was that the cockroach was the only known case of defensive bioluminescent mimicry (that is, the cockroach gets protection from predators). The firefly example is a case of what is known as aggressive mimicry, because the females mimic the males in order to lure them in and eat them.

    13. Re:Fireflies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yawn... Boring!

  3. Not to worry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These glowing cockroaches have been seen all over Fukushima Prefecture as of late.

  4. Best /. title ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that was a 70s Japanese sci-fi movie too

    1. Re:Best /. title ever by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      I think that was a 70s Japanese sci-fi movie too

      Mothra?

    2. Re:Best /. title ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol thats the one. Haven't seen it in years must check it out again. Thanks man!

      And sorry mothra, if you're reading. Didnt mean to compare you to a cockroach.

  5. Well obviously... by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 5, Funny

    They were doomed to failure, anyway.

    Their own lights kept scaring them under the refrigerator 24/7!

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    1. Re:Well obviously... by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      Lucihormetica luckae, huh? Not very luckae after all, were they?

    2. Re:Well obviously... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      They were doomed to failure, anyway.

      It's just Mother Nature trying to keep the world in balance. Cockroaches already scare many people as it is. A bioluminescent cockroach would be a little bit too much, I guess. The only worse thing would be a giant carnivorous bioluminescent centipede. If that ever appears in nature, I predict an asteroid strike will wipe it out.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Well obviously... by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      Interesting fact: it isn't just the light that makes them scurry away adn hide. They can smell us, and find us quite disgusting (presumably an evolved survival reaction: avoid mammals as they'll either eat you or just stomp on you).

    4. Re:Well obviously... by davewoods · · Score: 1

      They were doomed to failure, anyway.

      While linking arms with Parent: "Doooomed"

    5. Re:Well obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i still say it's NFC between their antane and the radioactivity of the human body.

    6. Re:Well obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But cockroaches don't run away. They run towards you, which is actually a good avoidance strategy since it reduces your reaction time. In the days when fighter planes got in to dogfights the same strategy was used. If you try to run away, you give your enemy an easy kill. Cockroaches running over people's feet is what really creeps people out.

  6. where can i get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one of those volcanoes anyway?

    1. Re:where can i get by Sique · · Score: 1

      At the Pacific Ring of Fire. Sadly, they don't do home deliveries, you have to pick up them yourself.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
  7. Futile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would a creature evolve to copy the rattlesnake's warning if nothing could mistake it for the real thing.

    1. Re:Futile by Sulphur · · Score: 2

      Why would a creature evolve to copy the rattlesnake's warning if nothing could mistake it for the real thing.

      Lady rattlers?

    2. Re:Futile by antifoidulus · · Score: 2

      Why would a creature evolve to copy the rattlesnake's warning if nothing could mistake it for the real thing.

      Because things do mistake it for the real thing? In terms of energy(and evolution is nothing if not the battle for energy, and of course, becoming energy) poison production is pretty expensive. Thats why a rattlesnake prefers to rattle, and will only bite either to kill prey or when it thinks it has no other way of defending itself, thus it evolved the rattle in addition to it's venom. Shaking its tail a few times is a hell of lot cheaper than biting(not to mention it takes time for the poison to replenish).

      However mimics have found an even more efficient way to scare away potential predators, keep the scare tactics but ditch the poison production. Best of both worlds!

    3. Re:Futile by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      Further, I think in the case of snakes, it's not really mimicry. Many many species of snakes shake their tails when annoyed. Rattlesnakes are a genus that evolved an especially novel modification to an established behavior.

    4. Re:Futile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Giggity.

    5. Re:Futile by cusco · · Score: 1

      Parent was referring to the summary's use of the word "unmistakable". Also, the noise that the king snake makes in dry leaves is almost identical to the sound of the rattlesnake. If it doesn't have dry leaves it's just tail shaking, but in the leaves where it normally lives it's quite efficient mimicry.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    6. Re:Futile by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      It was a joke.

      Like a venomless king snake beating its tail to copy the unmistakable warning of a rattlesnake[...]

      It's unmistakable, yet copyable. Does not compute.

      --
      What?
  8. Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    See, those volcanos have no respect for the environment just belching their CO2 all the time...now they've made something extinct

    SOMETHING MUST BE DONE

    Al Gore...where are you?

    1. Re:Global Warming by Sulphur · · Score: 0

      See, those volcanos have no respect for the environment just belching their CO2 all the time...now they've made something extinct

      SOMETHING MUST BE DONE

      Al Gore...where are you?

      Making a killing?

    2. Re:Global Warming by bunratty · · Score: 0

      Clearly humans cannot be responsible for any extinctions because extinctions have been happening in nature for millions of years without humans.

      IMPORTANT NOTICE: The purpose of this post is to illustrate the stupidity of this same argument applied to global warming. It's a shame I need to point this out.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  9. The title... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is so awesome!

  10. Is it a record? by meerling · · Score: 0

    Fastest extinction ever

    1. Re:Is it a record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends, theoretically it's possible that a new species was stillborn.

    2. Re:Is it a record? by Sulphur · · Score: 3, Funny

      That depends, theoretically it's possible that a new species was stillborn.

      When the world is ready : Laser cockroaches. The old ones died of inchoerence.

    3. Re:Is it a record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Groan

      I wish I'd thought of that one. Can I keep it?

  11. New? Already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A "new" species has an evolutionary history as long as any other species alive today. It hasn't "already" gone extinct. We just weren't aware of it. Or perhaps it was just scientists who weren't aware of it, humans live there.

    1. Re:New? Already? by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      For that matter, if the cockroach engages in biomimicry, isn't it possible that people are simply not noticing it because of it's similarities to it's poisonous cousin?

      Nature kind of happens, the fact is we don't always notice.

  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. Too bad, by pecosdave · · Score: 3, Funny

    see there was an obvious use for this species we're not going to get now.

    We could have imported this roach and turned it lose in the US. I know what you're thinking, last thing we need is ANOTHER type of roach in the US. Well, should these things inter-breed with native roaches and spread their glowing genes they would more easily be detected in the dark making their light the glowing beacon that attracts their own demise.

    I foresee a day when we will have roach hunting nano bots fueled by the very roaches they kill. Bioluminescence would have been just one more factor these bots, birds, bats, and the occasional shoe could have used to help hunt these creatures once their gene pool was poisoned by a virtual laser painting.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:Too bad, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I foresee a day when we will have roach hunting nano bots fueled by the very roaches they kill.

      I'm pretty sure that I saw an anime about that, except that the robots were hunting humans.

    2. Re:Too bad, by thereitis · · Score: 2

      I foresee a day when we will have roach hunting nano bots fueled by the very roaches they kill

      Agreed. The same concept could be applied to removing zebra mussels and other foreign species in the water. Or maybe the robot feeds off of animals but performs some other function, like removing toxic chemicals. Yet another robot could be sent into landfill sites to find useful metals, etc.. while feeding off of organic waste or combustibles.

    3. Re:Too bad, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I foresee a day when we will have roach hunting nano bots fueled by the very roaches they kill.

      There was a prototype robot a few years back that did something like that. I think it hunted mice, and deposited them in a fermentation device that would generate electricity to charge the robot.

  14. Oooh! Look at the cool glowing cockroach! by zrbyte · · Score: 1

    Oh, it's dead :(

  15. And no one thought about collecting alive ones? by KugelKurt · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seriously: It's discovery seems like a break-through and no one thought about catching a few alive ones to study them in a laboratory?
    I mean, "Oh, shiny! Let's catch a few!" is so obvious...

    1. Re:And no one thought about collecting alive ones? by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      well they are probably dead now.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    2. Re:And no one thought about collecting alive ones? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Seriously: It's discovery seems like a break-through and no one thought about catching a few alive ones to study them in a laboratory?
      I mean, "Oh, shiny! Let's catch a few!" is so obvious...

      Maybe someone collected the entire set.

  16. I guess it wasn't so Lukae afterall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all I've got.

  17. Wait by Dunbal · · Score: 0, Troll

    You mean extinctions are caused by other things than man? Shhhh! Don't tell the environmentalists! I'm sure they'll find a way to make us feel guilty for creating that volcano.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Wait by will_die · · Score: 1

      You are already too late. Humans causing volcano erruptions

    2. Re:Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You criticise environmentalists, but it seems in this case that most environmentalists are better informed about the issue of extinction than you are, so if you think they're stupid then what does that make you?

      Environmentalists are the least informed people on the planet. Dunbal must be an extraterrestial.

    3. Re:Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off course we could blame Bush...He created Hurricane Katrina.

    4. Re:Wait by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Off course we could blame Bush...He created Hurricane Katrina.

      It was aimed somewhere else?

  18. That's no bioluminescent cockroach! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a Zerg landing strip marker. The preparations for invasion are almost complete, and will only be delayed slightly by this successful defensive maneuver.

  19. Emergency Roaches by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was going to say they could have used these cockroaches in NYC when Hurricane Sandy hit, and the lights went out. Of course on the west coast, an emergency roach is something else entirely.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  20. And in Other news... by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 1

    In other news, Fukushima Daiichi has created a new species of bio-luminescent cockroach...

    --

    To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

  21. This is not the only such mimicry by qwerty+shrdlu · · Score: 1

    Some female fireflies mimic the flash patterns of other species to lure in and prey on the males.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefly

    1. Re:This is not the only such mimicry by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 0
      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  22. Note to self by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Create volcano in my home...

    1. Re:Note to self by cusco · · Score: 2

      Lived in Florida for a time, where they have six inch long cockroaches that fly. They were horrible, until I got a ferret. Apparently ferrets think that roaches are great toys, and when the toy breaks they're great snacks. Now whether the ferret is less of a nuisance than the roaches is another question entirely . . .

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  23. King Snake? by Dmritard96 · · Score: 1

    I don't think King Snakes have rattlers....They are known for imitation but I think instead it is visual. http://www.petmd.com/sites/default/files/coral_snake_0.gif

    1. Re:King Snake? by PezJunkie42 · · Score: 2

      King snakes don't have rattles on their tail, but will shake their tails in the same manner. In a pile of dry leaves, it sounds pretty convincing.

    2. Re:King Snake? by Dmritard96 · · Score: 1

      Interesting

  24. Smote mote by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    ...in god's eye. What happens when you don't expand your habitat range fast enough.

  25. There was no volcano by Sentrion · · Score: 1

    It was just another of their bioluminescent mimcry tricks. They swarmed to create the illusion of a volcano to scare away the humans so they could pull away undetected and hide in obscurity, increasing their numbers until the time comes for them to attack.

    One more reason to move ahead with global warming and destroy this planet before it gets the better of us.

  26. I doubt it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all if its a cockroach then it breeds like crazy and hard to kill. But if its been around long enough to the evolve the ability to mimic then I highly doubt it will just suddenly be completely extinct by a volcano of all things. And not to mention if we have been around for this long and just now found it this year then surely there are more that we havent found yet..

  27. Pyroclastic Flow > Bio-luminescence by chinton · · Score: 3

    Perhaps they should have evolved some sort of force field instead.

  28. One Just Left Microsoft! by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    I heard a luminary with profoundly huge self-importance just turned off the lights and left.

  29. EPA Lost and Confused by sycodon · · Score: 1

    The EPA is desperately searching for someone to fine/sue or get an injunction of some kind for this.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  30. They didn't die off.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the roaches just found a better predator to emulate... ...us....

  31. Re:Pyroclastic Flow Bio-luminescence by udoschuermann · · Score: 1

    Precisely, instead of a Glow In The Dark super power, they should have gone for Immunity To Fire. Cockroach Fail, methinks. ;-)

    --
    --Udo.
  32. Good riddance by jjsimp · · Score: 1

    Yeah, you cockroach supporters you heard me.

  33. Killed by Nature?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    B-b-b-but globalwarmingclimatechange must be blamed!

  34. Obliq Aliens Quote? (man I hate roaches...): by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Burke: Look, this is an emotional moment for all of us, okay? I know that. But, let's not make snap judgments, please. This is clearly-clearly an important species we're dealing with and I don't think that you or I, or anybody, has the right to arbitrarily exterminate them.
    Ripley: Wrong!
    Vasquez: Yeah. Watch us.
    Hudson: Hey man, maybe you havent been keeping up with current events, but we just got our ASS'S KICKED PAL!

    Having dealt with a german roach infestation at a duplex due to one nasty neighbor, I can safely say its the one creature on this planet right behind mosquitoes I truly wish wiped out....does that make me a bad person? : p

  35. Thank God ... by NoSalt · · Score: 0

    The last thing we need is more roaches.

  36. Simply not true by nukeade · · Score: 1

    This is not the only known case of mimicry by bioluminescence of a land animal, unless fireflies don't count (being that all of the insects in question can fly, they'd better count!). Pennsylvania's state insect is a tricky one, indeed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photuris_pennsylvanica

    It will duplicate the mating blinks of other species of firefly, and consume the attracted "suitors"!

  37. Tungurahua is exploding all the time. by epSos-de · · Score: 1

    Tungurahua is beautiful but not stable, the bioluminescent cockroach must have survived more eruptions than anyone can count. I bet it will survive the blast of this size too. I also bet that there are subspecies that live in a different hight, becasue Ecuador is famous for insane diversity of species. Birds can have 40 different colors in the same spot in Ecuador. Cockroaches are far more common than birds. By math alone, the cockroach must have survived.

  38. America must invade immediately by cas2000 · · Score: 1

    America must invade Ecuador in order to save this invaluable species.

    They will, of course, need to change Ecuador's extradition laws so that the perpetrators of this volcano-based atrocity can be brought to justice, no matter what embassy they may try to escape to.

  39. BAN VOLCANIC ACTIVITY!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly, our heroic political saviors need to draft some sort of legislation making it unlawful for the earth's crustal protuberances to erupt. Abracadabra!

  40. There's irony for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Cockroach" and "driven to extinction" in the same sentence. Wow.

  41. Impossible that is was done by volcano... by jscotta44 · · Score: 1

    ...everyone knows that the extermination of a species is only caused by human generated global warming – typically from the activities of people residing on the North American continent. So the story is obviously false.