Slashdot Mirror


Anonymous Attacks Israeli Websites In Response To IDF Operation In Gaza

An anonymous reader writes "On Thursday, Anonymous reported that it took down close to 40 Israeli government and security establishment websites, although the single website that they presented as having been attacked belonged to a security and cleaning services company. The report came after Likud MK Danny Danon announced earlier in the week that his website had been taken down by a group calling itself TeaM KuWaiT HaCkErS. Danon's website had been hosting an online petition calling for the Israeli government to cut off the supply of electricity going from Israel to Gaza. " A report at Russia Today puts the number at "hundreds" of sites, instead.

22 of 560 comments (clear)

  1. people on internet DDoS websites due to a thing by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slashdot seems to love reporting this recurring story, I guess because you can write it with mad-libs...

  2. Did anyone notice: by arthurpaliden · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You notice that the rocket attacks on Israel increased as the chances of Assad winning in Syria decreased. Almost like someone wanted to get Syria off the front page.

  3. Re:I think it's a falsified information. by Shoten · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think it's falsified...I think the issue is that Anonymous is not a singular, totally cohesive group. I absolutely think there are parts of Anonymous who are that reckless that they'd poke at Israel over this. For their sake, I hope they don't accomplish much; Israel has exactly *no* sense of humor when it comes to their own national security. There comes a time when a cyber action can provoke a kinetic response, and the Israelis won't be hampered by the need for search warrants, due process, etc.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  4. Anonymous by dskoll · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anonymous are a bunch of losers. They just want to revel in the limelight and taking the Palestinian side against Israel happens to be cool among leftists, anarchists, and other spoiled children with too much time and money and not enough wisdom.

    The best approach to anonymous is to ignore them. If they don't get the attention they seek, they'll go back to wanking off to online porn in their moms' basements.

    1. Re:Anonymous by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Informative

      leftists?

      really? or are you in parrot-what-the-talking-head says mode?

      no leftists are in favor of the combined arab aggression that wishes israel off the map (more accurately, all jews dead).

      left leaning people support democracy and its core principles. the israelis are the ONLY ones in that entire region that have any similarity to our western ways of thought and our world views.

      get fucking real and stop the paroting of bullshit talking points.

      you may not agree with all that israel does, but you cannot seriously take the arab view that 'death to isreal' is at all a valid thing to have as a goal.

      anyone who takes that point, even a little, is to be dismissed.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  5. Re:Bad juju? by Sun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I will give you a few simple ways to know whether your point on view on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is incorrect:

    1. If you think you can spot a clear villain, you are wrong
    2. If you have a simple solution, you are wrong
    3. If you think that Israel should do (or stop doing) something and the Palestinian should do (or stop doing) something, then you are probably right, but also out of touch with what is possible to achieve

    I'll illustrate with an example:

    I don't know how to solve the problem in the region, but it's a problem that was deliberately created by creating the nation of Israel smack dab in the middle of everyone that hated them and everyone that they hated.

    Deliberately by whom? Also, the great opposition to the Zionist movement started a (relatively) long time after Jews started immigrating to (then) Palestine.

    It's past time to do something.

    Right. Because, obviously, there is a solution. You can't think of one, but there must be something that can be done that is better than what is currently being done, right? I mean, none of the leaders could think of anything, and not one "expert" on the subject offers anything that has not been tried before and failed, but drinkypoo says that something can be done, so it must be true.

    It's too late to turn back the clock, which is unfortunate, because not doing it in the first place would clearly have been the best solution.

    Really? My mother's mother, and her brother and sisters, that left Germany between 1930 and 1936, beg to differ.

    Israel's blockade of the strip is probably illegal,

    International law seems to disagree with you on that point.

    and the only people who can stop them won't because they have too much to gain by maintaining the status quo. Keeping that region in a condition of endless war keeps all of those people busy.

    The only people I can think of who can stop this without causing even more bloodshed are Hamas leadership (proof: The west bank's leaders decided to mind their own business, and are experiencing both more freedom and more economic prosperity, despite the fact that, unlike the Gaza strip, Israel still occupies that region). While I suspect that the motives you claim for why they do that are, more or less, correct, I somehow doubt that's who you meant.

    Shachar

  6. Re:this is really sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, and I wish Israel would end its blockade, give the Palestinians a right to statehood, evacuate the settlements, and respect Palestinian borders so the Palestinians didn't have to fight for their own self-determination. While Israel continues its policies, Palestine will continue to be a shithole of poverty with people who can't legitimately complain to anyone because they don't have a state and the UN doesn't recognize them. Israel reaps what it sows.

  7. Re:I think it's a falsified information. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

    we're waiting, but its still naptime.

    as soon as he wakes up and has his milk, he'll call us back.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  8. Re:11 years ago by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes. You've been their and spoken to people - on both sides.

    You HAVE to ask yourself this: "From what source do I get my information, and how many levels of mediation are between me and the original source".

    You will find that your experience and understanding are built upon layers of unproven trust.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  9. Re:Bad juju? - FALSE. THERE IS 100% A VILLAIN. by mumblestheclown · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sorry. There is a very clear villain and I am not wrong. The villain is extremist religionists on ALL sides who (to paraphrase Christopher Hitchens, who made this argument far better than I ever could) poison the dialogue with their absolutist demands which they back up using the force of their chosen celestial sky wizard and his holy books.

    The vast vast vast majority of people on both sides favor a two state solution. the US wants this too, as does virtually everybody else. its the obvious answer. why dosen't it happen?

    because of people who think that whose first accountability is to some god, not their fellow man.

    they are the villians in this drama. no ands, ifs, or buts.

  10. Re:I think it's a falsified information. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nice. Now let's 'pretend' that in a given period of years, there is relative peace with no rockets fired, then one side fires indiscriminately into the other. Let's call them the aggressors. Then the non-aggressors fire superior (and better-targeted) rockets into strategic locations only. But you're right, the moral high ground rests solely with the aggressors.

  11. Re:11 years ago by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Yes. You've been their and spoken to people - on both sides."

    Yes, I have. You are being sarcastic, of course. You assume that I've never seen any of the mid-east. You assume that I get all my information from one or another biased big-media news source. But, I HAVE been over there. Beruit City was the most exciting and/or dangerous place that I have ever seen, with multiple armies and armed groups maneuvering in the countryside, as well as in the city. I was there before the Marines arrived to safeguard the remainder of the civilians.

    Don't assume anything, my friend.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  12. Re:I think it's a falsified information. by ydrol · · Score: 5, Informative

    Didn't Israel assassinate Palestinian leader just before a ceasefire was about to be brokered...

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/17/opinion/israels-shortsighted-assassination.html?_r=0

  13. Re:I think it's a falsified information. by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Pals gained a lot of worldwide sympathy with those moronic flotillas. And, here they squander much of that sympathy by attacking Israel in some hopeless gamble.

    No they don't. The entire islamic world has larger levels of anti-Semitism than Germany had in the 1930s (not that other kinds of racism are far behind), and the issue is simple : the more attention hamas captures, the more this anti-Semitism will play in politics in other muslim countries.

    The more attention hamas grabs, using any and all means, including their favorite tactic of getting their neighbours' children killed, the more successful they're likely to become.

    Their stated purpose is to bring back traditional islamic values, and they explicitly mention including eternal war (one translation "jihad") with, well, with everyone else. Another stated purpose of Hamas is to kill every Jew in the world.

  14. Re:Bad juju? by Johann+Lau · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nobody hated Jews in Palestine, until a bunch of Polish and Russian pricks, calling themselves "Hebrew" camped their little racist state on the coast, in the middle of the last century.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_antisemitism#Twentieth_century

    Just three examples which took me like 5 seconds to find:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem_pogrom_of_April_1920

    As the riots began, Jewish immigration to Palestine was temporarily halted by the British. Also, feeling that the British were unwilling to defend them from continuous Arab violence, Palestinian Jews decided to set up an underground self-defense militia, the Haganah ("defense").

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaffa_riots

    In a speech in June 1921 on the occasion of the Royal birthday, Samuel stressing Britain's commitment to the second part of the Balfour Declaration of 1917, declared that Jewish immigration would be allowed only to the extent that it did not burden the economy. In line with this interpretation, Jewish immigration was suspended. Those who heard the speech had the impression that he was trying to appease the Arabs at the Jews' expense, and some Jewish leaders boycotted him for a time

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1929_Hebron_massacre

    According to Asher Meshorer (Zemira Mani's son and Noit Geva's father), his aunt (Zemira Mani's sister - who was not present in Hebron during the massacre) had told him that the Arabs from the villages essentially wanted to kill only the new Ashkenazim. According to her, there was an alienated Jewish community that wore streimels, unlike the Sephardi community, which was deeply rooted, speaking Arabic and dressing like Arab residents.

    When the riots started, representatives of the Arabs came to the chief Hebron Rabbi, Rabbi Slonim Dwek, with a proposal - if he allowed them to kill 70 students from the yeshiva in Hebron, they would not kill the other Ashkenazim or the Sephardim. Rabbi Slonim Dwek told them, "We Jews are all one people." He was the first person to be killed in the riots, as he held his eldest son, 4 years old in his hands, who was also killed

    So yeah. Nice try but fuck you.

  15. Re:I think it's a falsified information. by Dog-Cow · · Score: 4, Informative

    Israel is aiming at weapon caches and missle emplacements. How is that not defense?

  16. Re:I think it's a falsified information. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Another stated purpose of Hamas is to kill every Jew in the world.

    and fwiw, hardcore muslims also have no tolerance for christians. both reject mohammed (piss be upon him) and therefore are subhuman.

    you think that if you let the islamists get rid of all the jews, they'll stop and be happy?

    I seriously hope people are not that stupid.

    islam hates all that don't fully agree with them. please, world, realize this and that this IS a world-level war.

    its being fought in the ME but it won't end there.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  17. Have you really thought that through by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Something to think about, since it appears you haven't: and what if an Assad attack against Israel pulls in Egypt and throws all the Palestinians into full all out war mode. Hmmmm?

    All of those combined military forces would not be able to do much to Israel. Palestine has been at nearly a full state of war for years already, so it's not like they can do more than the random rockets they already fire into Israel every day. Egypt is hurting and if they put too much military into fighting Egypt they will be toast from internal riots.

    Iran is the only one with much of a military force, but guess what would be a big old christmas present to Israel? A first strike from Iran to give Israel a reason to strike ANYWHERE within Iran using ANY weapon. Every nuclear plant in Iran is a smoldering pile of rubble within one hour of an attack from Iran on Israel directly.

    That also is true for Egypt and Palestine too you know. If either of them declare "war" war, then Israel gets to take the gloves off instead of having to worry about faked videos of injured people in Palestine.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  18. Re:Bad juju? by interval1066 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love how Hamas can arbitrarily lob rockets into Israel and when Israel defends itself the (almost) entire world cries foul. Hamas started firing the rockets in this, because Israel killed a Hamas commander who had orchestrated the bombing of several Israeli public areas, killing innocent people. You think if you create the most horrific retaliation this shit will end right then? Wanna BET? How the Palestinian terrorists get a pass all the time is beyond me. As far as I can see both sides are not beyond blame, but in every case Hamas starts the hot conflicts. You Arab fanbois are ridiculous. Israel will NEVER stop defending itself. All you do is dump more innocent Arab lives into the fire.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  19. Re:I think it's a falsified information. by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mossad is very good at what it does. As with the current action in Gaza, the idea to be "communicated" is that, if you attempt to hurt us, we will hurt you more than you can imagine. Usually, people get the message. Those who don't usually end up dead.

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  20. Re:I think it's a falsified information. by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The UN will never support Israel, because all the Islamic (and often the ex-Communist) states form a voting bloc. Check out this YouTube video, it explains a lot of what goes on in the (now thoroughly corrupted) UN, and why the UN wanted to 'protect religion from criticism) recently - which meant removing Free Speech rights (to criticize the insanity of religion, especially Islam:

    Understanding UN Bias Against Israel
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7Mupoo1At8

  21. Re:11 years ago by isorox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Yes. You've been their and spoken to people - on both sides."

    Yes, I have. You are being sarcastic, of course. You assume that I've never seen any of the mid-east. You assume that I get all my information from one or another biased big-media news source. But, I HAVE been over there. Beruit City was the most exciting and/or dangerous place that I have ever seen, with multiple armies and armed groups maneuvering in the countryside, as well as in the city. I was there before the Marines arrived to safeguard the remainder of the civilians.

    Don't assume anything, my friend.

    Well I haven't been to Gaza or Israel for about 8 months, so perhaps this is out of date, however I know your original statement

    Unfortunately, there aren't any "good guys" over there.

    is a load of crap. There's plenty of people trying to live nice normal lives in Israel, and live in fear of Hamas rockets landing on them every day. It's a terrible situation to be in.

    On the other side of the fence (literally), there's plenty of people trying to live nice normal lives in Gaza, and live in fear of Israeli warplanes bombing them. Several of them spy for Israel, that's how the IDF manage to get so many targets. If they're caught, they're killed.

    Given the mismatch in the power of each side, and the quality of housing, and the fact one side is governed by a terrorist organisation, means it's a lot more dangerous to live in Gaza than live in Ashkelon.

    Some people in Israel near the border are bugging out, fleeing their homes to go to the north until things quieten down again. I don't blame them. A friend in Jerusalem was worried enough when the rocket landed nearby.

    They're lucky to have that option, both having the money to escape, but also the freedom to move more than 30 miles from where they're born. On the whole though, they can't think it's that bad living near Gaza as there's little stopping them moving north (or south).

    People in Gaza don't have that choice. I have a magic western passport and GPO card, it enables me to pass through Erez into Israel more-or-less at will. People in the West Bank can move a little, and even go abroad, but people born in Gaza - on the whole - don't have the ability to leave. 99.999% of them are born, live, and die in an area 1/10th the size of Rhode Island, but 150% the population. They have to grow their food, power their houses, teach their kids, and bury their dead in that slab of land.