Slashdot Mirror


Thousands of Natural Gas Leaks Found In Boston

poofmeisterp writes "Due to old cast iron underground pipelines, natural gas leaks run amok in Boston, MA. '"While our study was not intended to assess explosion risks, we came across six locations in Boston where gas concentrations exceeded the threshold above which explosions can occur," Nathan Phillips, associate professor at BU, said in a statement.' With 'a device to measure methane' in a vehicle equipped with GPS, Duke and Boston University researchers created a nice little map showing the methane levels in parts per million at different points in the city. 'Repairing these leaks will improve air quality, increase consumer health and safety, and save money,' study researcher Robert B. Jackson, of Duke, said in a statement. 'We just have to put the right financial incentives into place.' It looks like money is an issue. Imagine that."

42 of 179 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Shhh... by Synerg1y · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or go driving around boston with an open flame...

  2. "Money is an issue" by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but money is always an issue for literally everything. We live in a world of finite workers and resources, and thus the abstraction of that, which we call money, is an important limiting factor on any task, no matter what the risk or rewards. The amusing irony is that treating money like its not a factor makes money more of a factor, by causing the limitations to appear at unexpected times.

    1. Re:"Money is an issue" by jhoegl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Finite eh?
      1.6 mil workers in USA not employed.
      Plastic/Steel/Copper pipes. I think Steel and Copper can be recycled.
      Cost is valued based on revenue generated, not based on "Finite resources".

    2. Re:"Money is an issue" by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      In an immediate sense, which is part of why money is an abstraction rather than a literal stand-in. I'm not advocating neo-liberalism here, I'm just saying every choice to do something is an implicit choice to not do quite as much of something else.

    3. Re:"Money is an issue" by onkelonkel · · Score: 3, Informative

      My personal favorite version of this is "Even if it only saves one life, it will be worth it" usually uttered by some will intentioned lackwit who wants you or the government to spend a huge sum of money to fix some minor safety issue. The proper answer to this is "You are an idiot. If we spend that money on we can save many more lives. Why should all those people die so you can maybe save that one person"

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    4. Re:"Money is an issue" by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > Those workers aren't employed because there aren't enough businesses with unfilled jobs to employ them.

      or.....

      Those workers aren't employed because there aren't enough businesses with unfilled jobs, that they are qualified to be employed in.

      There might, in fact, be plenty of jobs for people willing to learn how to work with steel and copper, but, in case you haven't noticed, picking up those skills isn't exactly high on most people's todo list.

      Or as I said to someone the other day.... a college degree is great, but, a high tech manufacturing sector isn't going to keep its machines running, much less set them up and use them, on what you learned getting your MBA or history degree.

      While its true, we need generic businessmen, and accountants, historians, and even telephone sanitizers; can we possibly admit that we have too many people aspiring to be on the "third ship" so to speak.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    5. Re:"Money is an issue" by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      So, what you're saying is that money is not a factor when money is made into a factor? Color me confused.

    6. Re:"Money is an issue" by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We always manage to find money for war (including the war on some drugs) and the TSA.

      Unlike those, fixing the leaks would have a quantifiable benefit in addition to the more difficult to quantify safety improvements.

      I would suggest spinning it as a potential terrorist threat, but fear the 'solution' would be DHS patrolling the streets confiscating lighters.

    7. Re:"Money is an issue" by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      Anyways, there are a lot of reason why ti's expensive. Mostly your ignorance on what it takes do do this work and keep a city running.
      I suggest you study civil engineering. You come up with a better way that works, you will be rich.

      Lol.. I don't have to study civil engineering to ask the fucking question. How stupid is that- requiring someone to be an expert to ask a question is ridiculous. So you are saying that nothing, absolutely nothing can be done to lower the costs of digging a hole that was already dug once before and patching or replacing a pipe that was already laid in the hole at some point in time where all the engineering and studies were already done at one time. I say hogwash. Some thing could be done if they wanted to that could reduce the costs of maintaining the pipes.

      because the latter way is already being done by companies all the time.
      I'm not sure why someone who clearly has some ignorant myopic view of how a city works would bother expressing an opinion based on nothing.

      And I'm asking if that is the only way or the most effective way. We can drive the prices of everything through the roof all you want. All it does is make the poor poorer and negligently impacts the rich. I'm not sure someone as ignorant of how the fucking world works such as you should be pushing you idiotic views without answering the questions asked. If you have nothing of value to add, then please just shut the fuck up and allow those who do the opportunity to speak. Idiots like you are what is wrong with this world. It's why a minimum wage is never enough.

    8. Re:"Money is an issue" by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

      It's a good question and, without doing any more research than having lived near Boston for 50 years, I'll say it's because Boston is a clusterfuck (Hub of the Universe. is what they tell us).

      Just take a look at the Big Dig project and you'll understand. Boston has its charm but it has always been, and will always be, a civil engineering nightmare.

  3. money shouldn't be an issue by hawguy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not sure how things work in Boston, but in areas where gas is provided by a regulated public utility, there is little cost to the company for infrastructure improvements. They identify infrastructure that needs to be replaced/upgraded, go to the PUC with the list of improvements and petition for a rate increase to pay for them. Then, in theory, the company is supposed to make the improvements, but that doesn't always happen, PG&E in California has been known to ask for money for specific improvements, then spending the money on other things.

    1. Re:money shouldn't be an issue by Xtifr · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure how things work in Boston, but in areas where gas is provided by a regulated public utility, there is little cost to the company for infrastructure improvements.

      Just because their mechanism for getting funds is unusual doesn't mean there's little cost.

      In fact, it's worse than that. The company's income is held hostage by local government, and if that government is controlled by short-sighted fiscal conservatives who equate rate hikes with higher taxes, then people's lives can be put at danger. Those who believe in "no new taxes" no matter what put us all in danger!

      PG&E in California has been known to ask for money for specific improvements, then spending the money on other things.

      Which has recently led to things like an explosion that destroyed nearly 40 houses in a suburban neighborhood, and killed eight people and injured many more. PG&E is probably going to be a little more cautious about such things in the near future.

    2. Re:money shouldn't be an issue by perpenso · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure how things work in Boston, but in areas where gas is provided by a regulated public utility, there is little cost to the company for infrastructure improvements. They identify infrastructure that needs to be replaced/upgraded, go to the PUC with the list of improvements and petition for a rate increase to pay for them. Then, in theory, the company is supposed to make the improvements, but that doesn't always happen, ...

      My grandfather worked for such a regulated public gas utility in the north east and that is how it worked. The cast iron pipes described in Boston sound like the gas lines he dug up and replaced in the 1950s-70s. They were originally installed around 1900. Such cast iron gas lines were considered troublesome and dangerous many decades ago.

  4. Beantown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are they sure it isn't just the beans?

  5. Hmmm .... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm thinking he can expect a visit from Homeland Security on this one -- now the terrorists know how to blow up Boston. :-P

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  6. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by lancelotlink · · Score: 2

    Well, now that the Charles River is, I believe, the cleanest water way in an urban city in the world, then other smells start to get noticed more.

  7. How about not wasting gas into the air? by ZeroSerenity · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What? Is that not enough of an incentive? If it goes into the air, you cannot sell it or make money off it.

    --
    For those who seek perfection there can be no rest on this side of the grave.
    1. Re:How about not wasting gas into the air? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      What? Is that not enough of an incentive? If it goes into the air, you cannot sell it or make money off it.

      Nope, like most such things, the inventory loss is accounted for, and already passed onto the consumer buried in a line item.

      I'd be very surprised to hear those companies are eating this cost. And, if they're just passing it on to the consumers, they don't really suffer any loss, and therefore don't care.

      In the same way that I have to pay a security fee when I fly so some flunky can grab my junk, it isn't the companies losing money on this -- it's taxpayers and consumers.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:How about not wasting gas into the air? by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      Depends, with anything like this you have to ask a few questions.

      What is the cost of fixing the leak?
      What is the cost of the product that leaks per year at current prices?
      Is there any other cost to you for the leakage?
      What is the remaining lifetime on the pipe before it comes up for scheduled replacement anyway?

      Based on these questions and various financial figures for the utility (what is their cost of funds? does the rate calculation algorithm consider the utility's spending and if so in what way? what is the inflation in natural gas prices?) you can then calculate if it's worth fixing the leak or not.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:How about not wasting gas into the air? by CowTipperGore · · Score: 2

      In my state, the gas distribution companies are allowed a set percentage of lost and unaccounted for gas (gas the company buys but doesn't sell to customer and no longer has). As long as the company stays within that acceptable range, they have little reason to care about further reductions since that offset is built into their rate. However, being above that rate means they blowing money out holes in the pipes.

  8. Financial Incentives by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You mean other than your property not exploding? I think your property not exploding qualifies as a financial incentive, doesn't it? Like if I told you "You need to fix this gas leak or your property will explode," I'm pretty sure you'll want to fix it.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Financial Incentives by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      The chances of your property in particular exploding though are pretty low, low enough that most people seem to put off getting these kinds of things inspected or fixed.

  9. Sequels Suck by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 4, Funny

    Big Dig 2: The Explosioning!

  10. How can money not be an issue? by xenoc_1 · · Score: 2

    Do the magic gas fairies provide the money? Because otherwise, it's an issue. Just where do you think the PUC or the Commonwealth of Mass. analog is going to get that money they give to the gas company? Have you noticed how broke and dysfunctional your state and its budget are?

  11. Don't blame the cows, blame the brahmins! by mveloso · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who knew that global warming/climate change was caused by Boston? That fossil fuel argument was just a smokescreen for what really causes climate change: Boston Baked Beans!

  12. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by bhcompy · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's like saying you're the smartest retard on the shortbus

  13. Given that this is Boston... by runeghost · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Someone should attach a circuit board along with some wires and blinking lights to the gas pipelines. That should get the government right on top of the problem.

  14. I believe it.... by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some of our infrastructure is OLD. A lot of it.

    Recently, we were dealing with my grandmother on the first floor. She would call saying she smelled gas, so she would open the windows then call us upstairs, of course, we couldn't smell it.... after a few times we called. They came and said our pipes were old, put some wax sealant on and suggested we fix them soon.

    I didn't doubt their diagnosis, the house has had gas longer than electricity....

    Then a few days later she smelled it again... this time we ended up with a whole crew down,....not in our house... but going up and down the street. Apparently it wasn't our pipes...there was a leak under the road across the street!

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  15. Re:Thousands what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "leaks" you fucking moron
    Learn to read for fuck's sake.
    3,300 natural gas leaks

  16. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by amck · · Score: 2

    Maybe not?

    Methane on its own doesn't have a smell. For safety, another gas like methanethiol is typically added, so that people can detect leaks.
    Perhaps these leaks are pure methane?

    --
    Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist
  17. Re:Shhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are you kidding? Watching someone holding the Olympic torch, running through the streets, leaving a trail of explosions in their wake would make for the most EPIC Olympic opening ceremony EVER!

  18. hang on by viperidaenz · · Score: 3, Informative

    They have a pretty picture showing huge peaks of up to 28.6ppm methane.

    Methane is only flammable in air between 50,000ppm and 150,000ppm

    1. Re:hang on by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've spent 36 years now as a natural gas leakage technician. I "know" gas leaks.

      The flame ionization instrument I use detects gas in ppm from 0 - 10,000. I can assure you that even when I get a reading of only 28 or 100 or 500 ppm at the ground, the leak at its source is bigger. You can't classify leaks the way these dudes were doing it. You have to punch a hole in the ground and use a combustible gas indicator to measure the gas in air percentage near the pipe.

      There is an explosive limit like you say, roughly 5% to 15% gas in air. Anything under or above that that won't burn or explode. There is danger when a structure fills up with gas and a danger when the gas is being ventilated. During the increase and the decrease the concentration passes through that explosive range.

      You won't always smell the odor. Something as simple as wet soil can leech the odor out of gas. Personally, I love the smell - it smells like $$$$.

  19. Re:Spend more not do anything by ilsaloving · · Score: 2

    Don't forget to factor in the cost of lawsuits when entire neighborhoods get vaporized!

    Unless that was part of the $200m.

  20. Re:Spend more not do anything by Worthless_Comments · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can tell you're not a sleazy CEO. You raise rates to cover the cost of the leak, fix the leak anyway, and then leave the higher rates in place to profit even after you've made up your loss.

  21. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by tacokill · · Score: 3, Informative

    No, they are not pure methane. The DOT requires gas companies to put methyl mercaptan (mentioned above) in the gas stream specifically so we can smell leaks. As far as I know, all natural gas that is distributed in the US has mercaptans. If you've smelled "natural gas", propane, or butane, you are smelling the mercaptans as those gases are odorless.

    Natty gas with H2S in it (aka: sour gas) smells like rotten eggs. However, at around 100ppm, you quit smelling it and you start dying instead. At 1000 ppm, one inhalation and you are dead.

  22. Re:Spend more not do anything by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 2
    You aren't either. Raise the rates to fix the leak, don't fix the leak, pocket the money, and when the explosion occurs, raise rates again.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/14/us-boston-fire-idUSBRE82D0DS20120314

  23. Re:Thiophane by reboot246 · · Score: 2

    Be amazed. I can find an underground natural gas leak so small you can't even smell it by driving by. And we're still using the old flame-ionization method of doing mobile leak surveys, so I have to drive at about walking speed. You service line and meter set are checked by someone walking using the same method. We don't need for the gas to be odorized at all. I've checked gas mains straight from the well to compressors to distribution gate stations that were not odorized. Your local gas company adds the odor.

    The newest technology for detecting leaks uses a laser tuned to the absorption wavelength of methane. You can detect a small gas leak while driving 15 or 20 mph, and very large leaks while driving a bit faster. Checking service lines and meters can be done much faster, too. The laser has a usable range of about 100 feet.

    That's what I've been doing for a living for the last 36 years. I've found tens of thousands of underground leaks and hundreds of thousands of above ground leaks. Saved no telling how many lives and houses.

  24. My experience in Boston with a gas leak... ugh! by jeeves99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I live in a dense residential neighborhood in a metro-suburb right next to Boston and have an active gas leak outside my house. You can smell it two houses in both directions.

    The gas company has been here twice. The fire department once. The town fire chief actually called an emergency number at the gas company to ask them to fix it.

    Guess what? No fix... 4 months and counting.

    The party line the gas company has been giving me is (paraphrased)... "There are too many leaks in the area, so we are triaging. Unless the gas is actively leaking INTO the house (as opposed to outside of the house), we won't fix it for now. Given the Hurricane Sandy response in the mid-atlantic region, things are pushed back even further. We'll keep monitoring the leak. Trust us."

    Uh, huh... yeah, my house is going to blow up. Or at the least, one of my trash cans on the curb is turning into a bottle rocket.

  25. Dublin's gas leaks were as bad by Diamonddavej · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the 1980s, Dublin gas network had 100s km of cast iron pipes, some 100 years old. The cast iron pipes were connected together by waxed joints, these joints were stable when moist Town Gas (coal gas) flowed through the pipes but when the city changed over to natural gas, which is dry, the wax dried out and the gas leaked. Town Gas was generated by passing superheated steam over coal, creating a gas containing hydrogen, methane and notoriously, carbon monoxide.

    In the late 1980s I could not walk more than 100 feet along suburban street before coming across an overpowering stench of leaking gas. One of the temporary fixes was to drill holes into side-walks to reduce the concentration of gas underground. I don't remember any gas explosions or accidents caused by leaking cast iron pipes then the leaks happened, given the number of leaks we were very lucky.

    By the way, almost half of the water supply in Dublin in lost through leaks (worst in Europe).

  26. Re:Does Boston really smell that bad? by CowTipperGore · · Score: 2

    In rural areas, customers are often served by farm taps on well gathering lines or transmission lines. The gathering lines are usually odorized but transmission lines can be a real problem. Transmission companies are not required to add odorant to their lines. The local distribution company has nothing but a regulator and meter sitting on the transmission line. Many of these taps are simply out of compliance and have no smell.