KDE 4.10 Beta1 Released

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Posted by Soulskill on Wednesday November 21, 2012 @10:54AM from the onward-and-upward dept.

sfcrazy writes "The KDE team has released the first beta for its renewed Workspaces, Applications, and Development Platform. 'With API, dependency and feature freezes in place, the KDE team's focus is now on fixing bugs and further polishing new and old functionality.' QtQuick in Plasma Workspaces has received a lot of work: 'Plasma Quick, KDE's extensions on top of QtQuick allow deeper integration with the system and more powerful apps and Plasma components. Plasma Containments can now be written in QtQuick. Various Plasma widgets have been rewritten in QtQuick, notably the system tray, pager, notifications, lock & logout, weather and weather station, comic strip and calculator plasmoids. Many performance, quality and usability improvements make Plasma Desktop and Netbook workspaces easier to use.' Here's the Feature Plan for 4.10."

27 of 73 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

KDE by Osgeld · 2012-11-21 11:08 · Score: 5, Interesting

Given the choices of the new DE's I have to say I could see my self actually using these last few KDE's, they have come quite a way since the early 4x days. Course I use XFCE cause I am more interested in my computer actually computing than having floaty windows and bullshit widgets all alpha blended like a hollywood production, but IF my choices were limited to GNOME3, Unity or KDE... I honestly believe KDE is the less bloaty pile of pain in the ass.
1. Re:KDE by sa666_666 · 2012-11-21 11:38 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  Talk about damning with faint praise.
2. Re:KDE by TheGoodNamesWereGone · 2012-11-21 12:34 · Score: 2
  
  I use KDE4 and I like it. I will say I agree with the OP that it was a piece of crap early on, and I still miss KDE3.
3. Re:KDE by yet-another-lobbyist · 2012-11-21 14:03 · Score: 3, Interesting
  
  ...they also seemed to have a rough spot in the past months. For months, there was no stable version available for ubuntu Precise, which is an LTS. Last month, they finally released 3.5.13.1, with support for Precise. I also had trouble accessing their web page and repos for many days in a row. Not exactly the kind of stability I would expect for my main DE.
  
  By the way, KDE 3.5 was my first Linux experience. It was my DE of choice; it worked well and I liked the configurability. But I always found it butt ugly. Looked way old-fashioned and outdated compared to OSs/DEs. Tried a few different themes, but that only made it worse. I still stayed with it for its functionality. But I always found it totally unsexy.
4. Re:KDE by chargersfan420 · 2012-11-21 15:00 · Score: 3, Interesting
  
  This is pretty much how I feel too. I use XFCE + compiz for the perfect blend of speed and desktop customizability. Gotta have a little bling. But the way compiz has been going, it looks like the day might come where it is no longer an option, and I hope that KDE will have their shit together by then. I've checked out KDE several times in the past, but it's just never looked "ready" yet. (to be fair it has been a while)
5. Re:KDE by Anonymous Coward · 2012-11-21 17:11 · Score: 2, Insightful
  
  Blame Kubuntu, not KDE ;)
6. Re:KDE by armanox · 2012-11-21 17:16 · Score: 2
  
  They're repos were very unstable when I tried it (I had it running on Fedora 16). Running KDE 3.5 on a modern comp (FX-8120, SSD, etc) was quite wonderful. I should try to see if any of the kinks have been ironed out (and I might try to build compiz too. KDE 3.5 + Compiz was my Linux Desktop Nirvana).
  
  --
  I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
7. Re:KDE by ls671 · 2012-11-21 19:12 · Score: 3, Informative
  
  I still run kde 3.4.2 on many slackware ran machines, patched to 12.2 . I run kde4 on my ubuntu laptop after giving a fair try to unity. KDE 3 is fine if you do not need all the pnp stuff for wireless, sound etc that used to take weeks to set up on a linux laptop. I used to run fvwm on slackware 1.2.3 and back then, I had a hard time moving to kde because of the awful resource consumed. Same old, same old.
  Well, even Linus says kde ain't in such a bad state. I always instinctively stayed away from gnome since it first came out and it had your workspace switching interface in a 3d cube and what not. So, fvwm, xfce, kde. On Ubuntu, install Kubuntu-Low-Fat-Settings.
  Kde4 still seems like a pig to me but it ain't as bad as most people pretend. You have to know how to read how much resources your programs really use. Below, in the top output, palsma only uses 28 megs RAM for itself really. My laptop is a thinkpad T43 with one Gig RAM and the total of my workload is about 6 Gigs if you look at the first column that says 300m. Do not let this fool you !
  1001 XX 20 0 300m 48m 20m S 0.7 4.9 6:13.32 plasma-desktop
  
  --
  Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
8. Re:KDE by armanox · 2012-11-23 03:39 · Score: 2
  
  You really expect me to write coherently and correctly at 12:16 when I'm only half awake? I haven't been able to do that since college.
  
  --
  I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
Accessibility by binaryhat · 2012-11-21 11:09 · Score: 5, Interesting

Still no focus adding an onscreen keyboard with word completion. This needs to be added. KDE is now in the mainstream. Windows 7 onscreen keyboard is great...Linux alternatives, suck. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265452
1. Re:Accessibility by ozmanjusri · 2012-11-21 11:42 · Score: 5, Informative
  
  As you probably know, since you're quoting the bug report, the Mallit keyboard from Meego (which has very good word completion) is already available in KDE Plasma Active, and is being ported to KDE desktop.
  The onscreen keyboard is a low priority for KDE desktop, because it's a desktop OS, not one intended for tablets. When W7 was released, Microsoft had no real tablet OS, so they've had to shoehorn the two interfaces together. Hence the predictive onscreen keyboard in their primary desktop UI. KDE is a bit more versatile.
  It's wonderful that you love Windows 7 so much - perhaps you should stick with it and leave Linux to those of us who enjoy using it? Learning a new tool can be challenging for anybody. You can check back in occasionally to see if it has stopped "sucking".
  
  --
  "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
2. Re:Accessibility by Hatta · 2012-11-21 11:47 · Score: 3, Interesting
  
  The onscreen keyboard is a low priority for KDE desktop, because it's a desktop OS, not one intended for tablets.
  I imagine, given the title of his post, that tablets are not his first concern.
  
  --
  Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
3. Re:Accessibility by binaryhat · 2012-11-21 12:12 · Score: 5, Interesting
  
  Actually I've been a Linux/KDE user since 2001. Yes Linux onscreen keyboards do stink. I have tried them. There is no reason why KDE desktop can't have a viable onscreen keyboard. I am pushing for one because I am disabled and cannot physically type, only operate a touchpad. Don't be so quick to judge : )
4. Re:Accessibility by ozmanjusri · 2012-11-21 14:48 · Score: 3, Informative
  
  Yes, but you can run Plasma Active on a desktop computer with a touchpad.
  It's simple to try, just test with the USB version, then install if you like it. KUbuntu has a good remix.
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu-active/releases/12.10/release/
  
  --
  "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
5. Re:Accessibility by Tough+Love · 2012-11-22 08:18 · Score: 2
  
  It's wonderful that you love Windows 7 so much - perhaps you should stick with it and leave Linux to those of us who enjoy using it?
  Come come, OP wasn't being critical of Linux, just noting that Windows has a better onscreen keyboard. For all I know, that may be right. If so it may be something to learn from.
  As for KDE being permanently a desktop environment and not for mobile... I actually have more confidence in the KDE project to get the details right than Apple or Google. The QT/C++ foundation is really powerful in that regard, for introducing the necessary new abstractions. Recall that Nokia's prime interest in QT was for mobile. See, the big difference between the KDE foundation and Google/Apple is, the corps are primarly interested in getting you to use your device in the way that is most profitable for them, while KDE tries to make the device most useful to you. Case in point: Google pushing hard for browser-only cloud-centric usage model while any damm fool can see that local, native applications are superior in many contexts.
  
  --
  When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
Definitely fun by Seeteufel · 2012-11-21 11:47 · Score: 5, Informative

KDE 4.10 gets definitely back into the fun zone. Hunting down bugs is more fun when there are few. The news test environments like Jenkins seem to be helpful, as well as reviewboard and EBN/krazy. Does KDE 4.10 compile with LLVM compiler?
Re:KDE + Beta = Rewriting Hell by yahwotqa · 2012-11-21 12:07 · Score: 2

One has to wonder why did you add the last sentence there. It has absolutely no relevance to the topic, and running Ubuntu server does not grant you any bragging rights - anyone and their dog can do that these days.
Re:Wallpaper DCOP by Anrego · 2012-11-21 12:42 · Score: 3, Informative

https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105319/
Looking like no.
There are two ways you can do it, one is via a javascript plasmoid type hack, and the other is by having a "current_wallpaper" file somewhere, setting it as your wallpaper, then overwriting the file to change it (KDE (should) pick up the change and set the wallpaper accordingly).
Of course, both of these options are absolutely ridiculous. It's understandable how something like this got missed in the switch from dcop to dbus, but it's annoying how long it has sat there (especially as the fix is really simple, and has already been written).
Only me? by gagol · 2012-11-21 13:12 · Score: 3, Funny

It really bothers me that people that are SO good at math cannot figure that 4.1 and 4.10 are exactly the same thing. Please name the 1 version 4.01 and 10 version 4.10. Trailing zeros have no values and are implied. FTR I work in marketing and I am not that advanced in math...

--
Tomorrow is another day...
1. Re:Only me? by colinrichardday · 2012-11-21 14:19 · Score: 2
  
  If that is so, would Version 4 be the sum of Versions 3 and 1?
2. Re:Only me? by SomeKDEUser · 2012-11-21 14:47 · Score: 2
  
  This is because you are not thinking about it in the right way: We do not know the number of versions, subversions, subsubversion there will be. Therefore, we cannot choose a nice base. If we knew there would never be more than 16 of them, Hex would work: 1.0, 1.2, ...1.A, 1.B, ..., 1.F.
  But we can interpret the digits between dots as a single symbol -- which it is, it is the number of releases at that level. Thus, x.y.z makes sense for any integers x, y, and z.
  It is in fact completely rigourous: we are counting, and picked the dot as a symbol separator between counters. Like IP adresses, or classes in many programming languages. If you think of releases as reals and not integers, you think wrong. Sorry.
3. Re:Only me? by JabberWokky · 2012-11-21 16:58 · Score: 5, Informative
  
  4.1 and 4.10 are not the same thing, as the period in a software version is not a decimal point. Do you think US Thanksgiving falls on 0.5 this year (since 11/22 is 0.5)? For that matter, how do you explain version 4.1.1? That's not even number!
  If you can comprehend dates that use slashes and not divide them out, or subtract ISO style dates (2012-11-22: US Thanksgiving falls on 1979 this year!), then what is the problem with periods as a separator for versions?
  IP addresses and ISBN numbers in books must drive you bug nuts. And I imagine you have problems with entering telephone numbers, since your slavish devotion to "all numbers are math" would cause you to multiply the area code by the exchange minus the subscriber code: (202) 456-1414 goes into your contacts as 95258.
  Or are you just being as silly as these examples?
  
  --
  "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
4. Re:Only me? by heefeneet · 2012-11-22 00:54 · Score: 2
  
  Good for you, I will not settle for ambigous mediocrity.
  But you are happy with meaningless pedantry?
  
  A marketing example - It really bothers me how people SO good at English cannot figure out that "new and improved" is an oxymoron. If something is new then there is no previous version to improve upon.
They could make me happy by by Lord+Kano · 2012-11-21 14:59 · Score: 2, Interesting

abandoning the 4.x tree and revamping the 3.5 tree. I'm using Trinity KDE because I can't stand 4.x.
LK

--
"Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
Bored and just wanted to say by present_arms · 2012-11-21 20:08 · Score: 2

To those thinking that 4.10 and 4.1 are the same, I'm on 4.9.2 (Four period nine period two) now to go back to 4.1 (four period one) would be silly as the beta is 4.10 which is (Four period Ten) I hope that clears things up for some :). on a serious note I'll wait for my distro (PCLinuxOS for those interested, not a *buntu fan personally) to have the stable in before I jump in

--
http://chimpbox.us
GNOME3 posts here by gtirloni · 2012-11-22 00:33 · Score: 2

Let's not confuse readers. Please post GNOME3 hate posts below only.

--
none
KDE's Better Than I'd Expected by reallocate · 2012-11-22 11:55 · Score: 2

Running 4.9.3 on Slackware. I've always run away from KDE. But, I turned off almost all of the desktop effects, spent some time finding a theme I like and tweaking things, add the Infinality font code, and I find myself very happily surprised. It's fast, easy, reliable, etc., etc. And, yeah, tweakable. Loaded openbox expecting to see big reductions in memory use. Didn't happen. I saw marginal changes. Besides, I get a menu when I right click on this KDE desktop. Why would I use openbox that does the same thing and little else?
I'd be happy to use Gnome 3 if I could control what goes in the panel and if that pseudo-dock behaved like a real dock. But, they seem fixated on sticking to One Very Narrow True Path. Too bad.
The truth is that both early versions of KDE 4 and Gnome 3 were releasesd months before they should have been. We all get to play guinea pigs for software that should have stayed in house for more development iterations, if the resources were there. They aren't.

--
-- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"