Slashdot Mirror


Confidential Police Documents Found In Confetti At Macy's Parade

cstacy writes "The Nassau County (New York) Police Department is 'very concerned' about reports that shreds of police documents (with social security numbers, phone numbers, addresses, license plate numbers, incident reports, and more) rained down as confetti in the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade. The documents also unveiled the identities of undercover officers, including their SSNs and bank information, according to WPIX-TV. Macy's has no idea how this happened, as they use commercial, colored confetti, not shredded paper."

36 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. How to shred by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think you'd need to ensure your sensitive documents were pulped, rather than simply shredded. Much harder to piece together paper machet'

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    1. Re:How to shred by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think you'd need to ensure your sensitive documents were pulped, rather than simply shredded. Much harder to piece together paper machet'

      Or just feed the paper into the incinerator in the basement that helps to heat your building.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:How to shred by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you'd need to ensure your sensitive documents were pulped, rather than simply shredded. Much harder to piece together paper machet'

      It's a question of volume. Once you start shoving serious quantities of paper, you should really look into sending all your printers and copiers to law school, and retooling the UIs and print drivers so that all printing automatically takes place in the context of attorney-client privilege.

      Thanks to the magic of inexpensive ethernet-attached printers and online degree mills, all the printers that the C-levels and above use are doctors as well as lawyers, and we imported a HIPPApotamus to guard the filing cabinets. It doesn't get more secure than that!

    3. Re:How to shred by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um... no. Our air conditioning costs (even in mid-winter) are already high enough without adding more heat.

      OK, so what about a heat-engine powered AC unit? (Besides, you know, not everyone lives in a jungle.)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:How to shred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absorption_refrigerator

    5. Re:How to shred by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or just feed the paper into the incinerator in the basement that helps to heat your building.

      It is surprisingly difficult to burn large quantities of office-quality paper and ensure that nothing is left except ashes.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    6. Re:How to shred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or just feed the paper into the incinerator in the basement that helps to heat your building.

      It is surprisingly difficult to burn large quantities of office-quality paper and ensure that nothing is left except ashes.

      Which is why such documents are shredded and then incinerated. I used to work for a bank, there's nothing difficult about it at all. The only thing people should take away from this article is that shredding documents really doesn't do much (if anything) to keep your data private.

    7. Re:How to shred by jonwil · · Score: 3, Informative

      The best answer is to shred the documents with a proper cross-cut shredder, pulp the shreds and then recycle the pulp into new paper things.
      And its good for the environment too :)

    8. Re:How to shred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Some idiot kid incinerated our plastic trash cans. Ordinary trash and recycleable trash cans burnt down to the wheels. The paper trash can was only burnt one third down, and the paper itself stacked/compressed inside rather compactly was mostly untouched. I suppose that the problem is getting the oxygen where it counts.

    9. Re:How to shred by fuzzybunny · · Score: 3, Funny

      That'd be hilarious. I can already imagine the business justification: "we need to install a heater so we can power the cooler because we heat too much when it's cold outside."

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    10. Re:How to shred by craigminah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Looking at the size and length of the shredded documents, it looks like the police used a $29 home shredder from Staples. They should spend a few more dollars and get a shredder that can reduce their paper to dust or at least small bits instead of long strips.

    11. Re:How to shred by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Informative

      But that won't cover stuff printed in portrait format. Shredding in only one direction is a bad idea.

      Hell, my home shredder, like most of them nowadays, is a cross shredder, which means it's cutting in both directions at once. That ends up making fairly small confetti-like pieces.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    12. Re:How to shred by Sentrion · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...They should spend a few more dollars and get a shredder that can reduce their paper to dust or at least small bits instead of long strips.

      You must be one of those tax-and-spend liberals. The solution is to shutdown the police department, reduce firearm regulations, and allow the invisible hand of the free market to decide who can get away with crime.

    13. Re:How to shred by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      it would probably burn quite vigorously.

      Sounds like a job for MythBusters

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    14. Re:How to shred by Bigby · · Score: 3

      It does wonders when your information isn't worth much. It is like having a lock on your crappy car. Why would someone steal it when there are so many better locked cars or flat out unlocked cars available nearby?

      Security is relative.

  2. We still do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Throw crap all over to celebrate what.... yay we're job creators! someone has to pick all this shit up!

  3. I call BS on this by multiben · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First of all, I believe Macy's on this. Why would you try to save a few bucks by using recycled documents? They're not a pet store. Secondly, confetti is usually pretty small, so who was walking around piecing tiny bits of paper together in the middle of the parade? I guess it's possible but the whole thing just smells like your standard internet myth.

    1. Re:I call BS on this by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unless the evidence just *magically* disappears from the hands of the people who collected it and took pictures at the parade, we pretty much have to accept that shredded documents did end up getting tossed around like confetti.

      That done, we get into the question of where in the chain from NYPD filing cabinet to document disposal company to recycler, to party supplier some deeply underprocessed documents made it into the final product...

      Does NYPD not even cross-cut onsite? Fuck, my workplace does that(paper, HDD, and tape) and we don't exactly have people who infiltrate the mob for a living. Did the 'secure document lifecycle solutions' vendor cut some serious corners? Is there a bulk confetti supplier who is cutting the product with material from the shred stream in order to lower processing costs?

    2. Re:I call BS on this by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In addition, I have a cross-cut shredder at my home. I've looked at the bits of paper that come out of it, and it's nigh impossible to get any meaningful information off of them -- certainly not "Pete Jones is an undercover police officer, yes that Pete Jones, the one who buys his cocaine at the Acme Bar, the guy with the weird mustache." And mine is pretty old, too. They have ones that slice and dice the paper much finer than mine.

      So, while I'm not saying it's impossible that somebody picked up some confetti at a parade and realized to their horror that it contained sensitive, confidential information; but if that did in fact happen, it was clearly an intentional act by someone.

      Cue the dramatic organ music... and now let's start talking Occam's Razor. Do we believe this story, really?

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    3. Re:I call BS on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was not a cross-cut shredder. The police reports evidently came in "strips."

      See this article.

    4. Re:I call BS on this by guruevi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You really think the 'commercial' document shredder companies do what they say? No, they take the paper or hard disks or whatever off your hands and now your manager has a false sense of security.

      What does the shredder company do: they try to make money on both ends. Selling large amounts of recycled paper as confetti paper is a pretty good deal as a) they get paid for it and b) the confetti company doesn't have to pay for brand new paper.

      Do you really think the hard disks you gave them will get shredded as they say? No, it will get taken apart and the individual pieces (rare earth magnets, platters etc.) will get recycled wherever it is cheapest.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    5. Re:I call BS on this by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You really think the 'commercial' document shredder companies do what they say? No, they take the paper or hard disks or whatever off your hands and now your manager has a false sense of security.

      What does the shredder company do: they try to make money on both ends. Selling large amounts of recycled paper as confetti paper is a pretty good deal as a) they get paid for it and b) the confetti company doesn't have to pay for brand new paper.

      Do you really think the hard disks you gave them will get shredded as they say? No, it will get taken apart and the individual pieces (rare earth magnets, platters etc.) will get recycled wherever it is cheapest.

      I'm pretty sure that the ones who bring containerized/tractor-trailer-installed shredders to your site and allow you to watch the sweet, sweet, destruction are probably not lying, since they have little ability to resist trivial inspection. Anybody else, for reasons totally unrelated to having to do real work, rather than 'ensuring secure document lifecycle management' by watching huge shredders get their shred on, I heartily distrust.

    6. Re:I call BS on this by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

      TFA is entirely worthless; but the stuff showing up on Google images for this little fiasco shows strip-cut material that hasn't even been fed into the shredder in the correct direction(so the strips tend to include entire lines, rather than mere fragments) unless our dear intertubes are lying, somebody did an atypically bad shredding job, even by the standards of small-business-who-buys-their-shredding-through-staples standards.

    7. Re:I call BS on this by Sentrion · · Score: 3, Informative

      Good point. It's all too easy to spin pre-shredded documents to look like your docs are being shredded when the real docs are being transferred to a safe storage box to sell to corporate spies and ID theives. A document scanner could also just as easily be installed between the feeder and the cutting blades to record data milliseconds before shredding. Printers and copiers are a major security concern as well since most of today's models will save digital copies of recently printed documents in onboard memory. If you have secrets worth shredding it's probably best not to outsource the task to a guy with a truck earning minimum wage. Same goes to outsourcing your IT department.

  4. The cynic in me thought... by arielCo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "It landed on her shoulder," Finkelstein said, "and it says 'SSN' and it's written like a Social Security number, and we're like, 'That's really bizarre.'"

    Finkelstein, a Tufts University freshman, said he and his friends were concerned and picked up more confetti that had fallen around them.

    [cynical]
    They were lucky not to be charged for "illegal appropriation of classified government documents" or something like that, like that poor sod who bought a used computer, found kiddie porn in it and duly reported it.
    [/cynical]

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  5. I got two words for you by lsllll · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cross Shredder

    --
    Is that a roll of dimes in your pocket or are you happy to see me?
  6. Re:WTH? by PNutts · · Score: 3, Informative

    The journalist uses the word "confetti" which does not mean "long strips of paper that were not crosscut shredded". Every shredder I've seen for the last decade has been a crosscut shredder instead of the old style. There's one in this office not ten feet from me that does crosscut shredding, and my Dad has one in his office too. These are the ordinary models that anyone can buy. So, were these police documents ribbons instead of confetti? The article doesn't say. Yet another proud day for journalism.

    Also, not a proud day for reading comprehension. TFA states "shredded police documents mixed in with confetti". Other articles have photos and videos of the strips of paper which have complete lines of text.

  7. Shredder models by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Heh... I'd just go with a high security shredder approved by the NSA. Chops your average 10 pt font letter into at least 4 pieces.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Shredder models by LoRdTAW · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Back in the 80's (sometime after the Iran-Contra affair) my grandfather was contracted by a government contractor to design and stamp the cutter wheels used in secure paper shredders. Basically the shredder must produce paper shards no larger than 1/32 inches (0.79mm) wide and 1/8 inches (3.17mm) long. Pretty much dust comes out of the bottom of this thing. The wheels were stamped from big heavy rolls of steel stock and then heat treated. I can still remember the constant loud chatter from the 20 ton OBI press as it stamped out one cutter after another 6 days a week. It has a rather powerful 1/2 HP motor with a gear reduction head and a chain drive to the shredder mechanism. The frame was heavy 1/4 thick steel plate and the unit was housed in a nice heavy duty steel box. It does have limits on how many papers it can handle at once, something like 10 - 15 8.5x11 sheets at once before it jams.

      We have a complete unit that was used as our paper shredder for years until it became too bulky. It weighs close to 80 lbs and must be suspended on a stand over a bag or bin, it doesn't fit under a desk. We also have a complete mechanism with chain and motor as well as a half assembled unit. We still have the shredder, but we now use one of those cheap staples bought cross cut shredders, does the job nicely. Those shredders were built to last and I bet there might be some still in operation at various government agencies.

  8. Not slicing on-site... by raehl · · Score: 3, Informative

    Shredding paper reduces average paper fiber length and thus also reduces the value of the paper as a recycled material. Also makes the paper take up more volume in transport. Additionally, if you don't trust your recycler to securely handle your intact paper, shredding the paper before you give it to them is a minimal improvement for the same reason shredding the paper before throwing it all over new york city wasn't very secure, and there was far more randomization there than shredding paper into a bucket.

    So there's significant practical reasons to not shred the paper before shipping it out - increases costs, reduces value, minimal security improvement.

  9. They do make non-crosscut shredders by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not saying there's any validity to this story (it sounds like BS to me) but you can get shredders that shred to various standards. Fellowes sells shredders that are strip cut, cross cut, and micro cut (more or less makes powder). The reason is because the more intense the cut, the less amount of paper a given size of motor can handle. For example take three of their shredders, all with the same basic build and model number. The strip cut version can do 21 sheets at a time, the cross cut 14, the micro cut 10. Same motor, same general construction, only difference is the blade assembly.

    It has nothing to do with size either. You can find large ones that are strip cut. Fellowes has a 35 sheet strip cut commercial model they sell (costs about $4k). The more you want the paper cut up, the more blades you have to have, thus the more resistance, thus the less it can handle at once.

    As such businesses may choose the higher capacity, but less secure, shredders for some documents. They also cost less to buy.

    That's also why micro cut shredders have never become all that popular. Their cost goes up again because of the more blades and they can't handle a lot at once.

  10. Anyone considered it was deliberate? by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Especially if the organizer of the parade claims they use commercial confetti, and bluntly, why shouldn't they, considering that it's one thing less to think about and it most certainly isn't one of the big numbers on the bill.

    Can anyone see a snitch working in the cleaning crew responsible for cleaning out the shredded papers using the parade to hand some info out to his friends? He cannot access sensitive material, of course, and if he took home a few cubic meters of shredded paper someone might wonder what's going on, but grabbing it and dumping it out during the parade, nobody would notice.

    All you need is a man in the cleaning crew for after the parade. Thinking of it ... all you really need to get this rolling is a company specializing in cleaning... Anyone looked into this?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  11. Re:Anyone curious about Motive? by cusco · · Score: 3, Interesting

    More likely simple stupidity. The local public utility district used to shred their documents and give them away to local horse farmers for use as bedding. Someone fed some customer data into the shredder the wrong way, and the stable it went to belonged to a local newspaper editor. Of course it became front page news, now the district has to pay to get stuff shredded and the horse breeders no longer get free bedding.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  12. Scrap paper by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Police in my state got into trouble once for printing out license and registration data and using the printouts as scrap paper in their front office, so if they had to write something down for a member of the public they might get somebody else's details on the back.

  13. Darpa Shredder Challenge & outsourcing+unshred by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, that's what happens when you outsource a significant privacy-related concern to someone outside of your internal domain: they might not shred it well enough or finely enough so that it is unrecoverable. Just look at the DARPA Shredder Challenge to see how much can be recovered from shredded documents.
    Also, see the movie Argo for another example of the carpet-weaving approach to unshredding strip-shredded documents when you've got enough manpower.

  14. Shredding company? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's my theory:
    NYPD decides, as many businesses do, to contract with an company for shredding. They ship their confidential documents off to this company and they get shredded. This way the NYPD doesn't have to buy a bunch of shredders and deal with internal shredder compliance.

    The company doing the shredding decides that they're going to make an extra couple bucks and sell their shredded documents as "confetti". Someone in the purchasing office for the confetti company isn't looking to closely and makes the purchase. The shredded documents are shipped and then mixed into the confetti.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.