Dell's Ubuntu Ultrabook Now On Sale; Costs $50 More Than Windows Version

nk497 writes "Dell's 'Project Sputnik' laptop is now on sale. The XPS 13 Developer Edition comes with Ubuntu 12.04 pre-installed, and costs $1,549 — $50 more than the same model running Windows. The Ubuntu Ultrabook is the result of a skunkworks project to optimise the open-source OS to run on Dell projects, to create better laptops for developers. The idea of the project was to create a laptop for developers, based around 'the idea that developers are the kings of IT and set the agenda for web companies, who in turn, set the agenda for the whole industry,' Dell said." Reader skade88 points out a positive review from Ars Technica.

Comments

Surprised?

[Anonymous Coward]

Did anyone expect better from Dell? They have a history of doing this with Linux laptops.

Re:Surprised?

[skade88]

Dell did a lot of work to make sure drivers were solid. Its not cheap to make a laptop have a perfect out of the box experience.

Re:Surprised?

[History's Coming To]

Actually, it might be the way to do it. Linux is out there, for free, in many forms, and people who see free as being a major point have already downloaded it. Whilst *we* know that the extra $50 is probably because they don't receive the same crap-ware subsidies, it'd be easy to pitch it as "it's $50 more because it's a better operating system". Sometimes charging more will automatically make something seem better...I can see it now..."Well sir, yes, you could have the Windows option, but for a measly $50 we can upgrade you to a more secure, stable operating system that comes with a huge library of free software and all future upgrades will be free, you'll save money the first time Microsoft brings out a new Windows."

Might very well work.

Re:Surprised?

[dotancohen]

Dell did a lot of work to make sure drivers were solid. Its not cheap to make a laptop have a perfect out of the box experience.

Exactly. What people don't realize is that to provide a good experience for end users, putting Linux (any distro) on a computer entails more work for the manufacturer than just installing Windows and letting Microsoft sort out the hardware compatibility issues.

And I'm happy to pay $50 more for a Linux laptop than a Windows laptop. That's not a significant amount of money compared to the price of the machine, and it sends a clear message that we are willing to pay real money for a higher quality operating system. Finally, it dispels the myth that Linux users are cheapskates and self-filters those users who would buy a Linux laptop just to pirate Windows.

Re:Surprised?

[ColdWetDog]

If yopu sell windows laptops, and someone calls with a problem, support staff has to make the call as to whether this is a defect or not, and may have to help the user fix it, depending on the details.

From Dell? Do something different? I doubt it. Channeling a very old post -

- User calls up Dell Linux support --

SUPPORT: "Hi, I'm Bob, from Wheatfield, Kansas".
USER: "What?"
SUPPORT: "My name is Bob, from Dell Support here in Kansas"
USER: "OK, I'm having a problem with my Linux laptop"
SUPPORT: "Is it plugged in?"
USER: "Yes, it's plugged in, the battery reads 90% charge."
SUPPORT: "Can you look at the plug in the wall and verify it is plugged in firmly to the wall socket?"
USER: "I've already done that."
SUPPORT: "Please to look at the connectors on the power brick and make sure they are firmly attached."
USER: "I've already done that."
SUPPORT: "Please recheck those connections as we cannot proceed until you have afirmated that they are connected."
USER: (Sighs) "OK, Don't you want to know what problem I'm having?"
SUPPORT: "We will be happy to get to that issue in a moment. For now can you please reboot your computer."
USER: (Sighs) "OK."
SUPPORT: "Excellent! Now please re install the operating system"
USER: -- Click ---

Don't see how it's any different from the current support script.

Re:Surprised?

[gfxguy]

But I AM a cheapskate. If I really wanted one of these, I'd buy the Windows version and then install Linux on it. Make it dual boot and get the best of both worlds.

Of course, $1,500 is more than I'm willing to spend on a laptop at all anyway.

Re:Surprised?

[dotancohen]

But I AM a cheapskate. If I really wanted one of these, I'd buy the Windows version and then install Linux on it. Make it dual boot and get the best of both worlds.

Of course, $1,500 is more than I'm willing to spend on a laptop at all anyway.

Then stop already. Do you want to show Dell that there really exists demand for Linux from the factory? Then pay the measly $50. It will be worth it for yourself in the long run.

Re:Surprised?

[wile_e_wonka]

Not to mention--I assume Dell doesn't get any money for crapware on the Linux variant. (I have no idea how much money Dell gets for crapware, so I don't know if it is enough to totally offset the license for Windows, but it's a thought anyway)

Re:Surprised?

[RobinH]

When I called for support for my XPS desktop (audio problems with Vista), I did get routed to a different 1-800 number I had to call. I got a person who treated me like an adult.

Re:Surprised?

[LVSlushdat]

Then do it yourself. And then order that laptop instead. Good luck.

That's what I always do... Never owned any laptops besides Dells, won't buy any besides Dells.. their corporate models that is,.. When I feel the need to refresh my current laptop, which is a Latitude D620, I go to the Dell Outlet, find a "scratch&dent" of the model I want, and buy it.. Usually priced about
20% below the same model from "build-to-order"... On arrival, the hard drive is pulled and stored with the un-EULA'ed Windows install intact, and another
320-500GB SATA drive is installed, and Mint Linux gets installed on it.. The drive pull is incase theres a warrantee issue during the warantee period.. I pull the linux drive, slap the Windows drive back in to allow all the diags they have you run. After the warantee period, the windows drive gets wiped and reused.. Been doing this for myself and friends for about 5 years.. It used to be Ubuntu until the Unity turd was shoved down Ubuntu users throats, now Mint is the OS-of-choice... Never had ANY driver problems with Mint on any Dell Latitude I've installed it on, BUT upon my first clean install of Ubuntu 12.04 on a Latitude D620 with the Broadcomm wifi, which by the way worked perfectly first-time/everytime under Ubuntu 10.04, the wifi driver showed loaded in an lsmod, but network-manager did not indicate the wifi stuff was loaded.. Went to Mint (Maya), and once again, worked perfectly immediately.. Having been a loyal Ubuntu-ite since 7.04, I strongly believe Canonical/Ubuntu has truly jumped the shark.. Mint for me and mine from here on out...

Re:Surprised?

[bluefoxlucid]

Dell did a lot of work to make sure drivers were solid. Its not cheap to make a laptop have a perfect out of the box experience.

Exactly. What people don't realize is that to provide a good experience for end users, putting Linux (any distro) on a computer entails more work for the manufacturer than just installing Windows and letting Microsoft sort out the hardware compatibility issues.

Really? Because if you just pick chipsets that tend to work out of the box--AMD or Intel graphics, Intel wireless (Broadcom too, with firmware), most on-board sound and ethernet, etc etc etc... basically, anything fairly common--it JUST FUCKING WORKS. People have been installing Linux on Linux-doesn't-work-on-this-says-the-manufacturer hardware for years and it just works.

The last time I had a hardware problem with a laptop, it was an old 1999 HP laptop that had a bad BIOS with an incorrect ACPI table; I patched the Linux kernel driver to carry the correct table (Microsoft's driver did this too), but eventually just found the (erroneous) table in a BIOS dump and hex-edited it to the correct value, then flashed it onto my bios. Those days are long gone; things just work these days.

Re:Surprised?

[timeOday]

You just pick the right parts. You include "works well with Linux" as one of the business requirements when designing the thing. THAT is not worth $50 per laptop.

Really? I've been using Linux on laptops for over 10 years and wasted many days trying to get things to work over time. Actually I've never seen power management work correctly under linux - not in combination with hardware graphics acceleration, wifi, and external displays. (Even my MacBook running OSX still gets confused and needs an occasional reboot...) Nowadays laptops dynamically switch from Ivy Bridge graphics to the NVidia card to save power... I'd be amazed if Linux can even use both (seems like I remember a lot of tinkering on a Thinkpad T400, one of the first dual-graphics solutions, to get that working), let alone switch dynamically.

I just ordered a Windows 7 laptop from Dell and plan to shrink the Windows partition a bit to make room for a linux install. If I could have added a preinstalled Linux multi-boot as a $50 option, or a $150 option, I certainly would have (it's a work machine).

Re:Surprised?

[erroneus]

AH!!!!

I think you hit on EXACTLY why the price is higher. Not some 'deal with Microsoft' that, if uncovered would mean a world of hurt for both Dell and Microsoft, but that they are losing a revenue stream by not having crapware installed! Things are beginning to make a little more sense now.

Just how much does Dell get from installing crapware?

Re:Surprised?

[Nerdfest]

I was going to add that I would pay the extra $50, but after looking at the machine, no. They're calling this a developer's laptop, but it only has 1366x768 resolution for that price?

Re:Surprised?

[Anonymous Coward]

But are you developing in 1080p? BluRay? HDMI? I thought not.

With my webcam, I can attach facial expressions to code comments.
In 1080p, I can write single lines of code longer and longer, negating the need for childish multiline programs.
My nVidia Quadro means that I can seamlessly wobble windows...I use a desktop tetrapolyhedron instead of a mere cube.
With HDMI and bluray, I can watch youtube videos about Java and other promising technologies at gigantic size.

You are holding yourself and your industry back.

Re:Surprised?

[rHBa]

Personally I'm not buying one of these Developer laptops until they get Norton trial version running under WINE

Boatware

[Anonymous Coward]

Thats because all the pre-loaded bloatware on win machines practically pays for the MS license.

Re:Boatware

[mschiller]

Practically? This clearly demonstrates that it pays for the windows license and is also a revenue stream. Either that or Dell is sticking it to linux users just to get a few more bucks... Probably a windows machine that they just pay some high school student to install linux onto....

Who wants to take a bet there is a windows 7 key on the bottom of the laptop?

Re:Boatware

[lilo_booter]

Indeed. I don't see the problem anyway - just because it's based on free software does not mean it's free to produce a good product. I'm in the market for a new laptop and may even consider this one - but if it too comes with bloatware/shovelware, I'll probably avoid it...

Re:Boatware

[Zemran]

Why not just buy the cheaper, Windows version, reject the EULA and demand a refund, then install Linux yourself?

Re: Boatware

[Dupple]

Boatware - Dell have been at sea for ages and their profits are sinking

Re:Boatware

[Anonymous Coward]

Why does this sentiment never get any thought? Something tells me that Dell's bottom-line shrinks when they have to start working to support hardware on an operating system that isn't part of their core offering.

If Dell didn't put extra work into making sure everything was rock solid, the community would be complaining that Dell didn't take the time to support Linux. They actually put the effort in and the first complaint is price.

Just because Linux is free doesn't mean the cost to engineer a Linux laptop is automatically cheaper. Dell has been working with Windows for over a decade. Every time they start making inroads with Linux, the community bitches about price. I'm surprised they even try at this point.

The alternative is Dell sells the hardware and doesn't put any effort into validating compatibility with Linux and leaves it to the users, while offering rock-bottom pricing. If they do that, then all of a sudden the customer experience for folks *not* already familiar with Linux is terrible and everyone acts surprised.

Get the fuck off my lawn, you whiny little nerds.

** For the record, I use Debian as my primary desktop at home and would gladly pay for a tightly coupled experience on a laptop. It takes time to get there and realize the costs savings that is intrinsically associated with Linux being free. You have to go uphill first and reach the peak before you can start looking downhill. Why is it so hard for the Slashdot community to get that simple logic imbedded into the loosely coupled meat between their ears?

Re:Boatware

[Kjella]

Linux technical support does not cost more than Windows tech support, especially when you consider the volumes involved.

The volume of what? Windows sales to Linux sales? Let's face it, every manufacturer makes things work with Windows because it's on 90% of all PCs, as they would with any OS that's on 90% of all PCs. How many hours have they spent making sure it all works under Linux and how many sales can they divide that by? If they have to maintain that support in new versions of Ubuntu, how many sales can they divide that by? Because I'm sure people would be most unhappy if in 6 months the next Ubuntu upgrade would break it. Never mind the people who'd gladly buy the Windows version and install Ubuntu themselves to both get a dual boot machine and save $50.

The people who buy the Linux version, well they're probably going to feel entitled to some Linux support and actually use it. Just because you do have the technical skills to dig into a problem and fix it yourself, it's very convenient if you can get someone else to fix the problem for you. And they'll probably have higher expectations than the cheap outsourced Windows support who's mostly there to solve PEBCAK problems with scripts. And to be honest it's not really much of an untapped market because if people here don't like the offer they'll just pick some different model and install it themselves. It's not like you get lots of sales because you're one of few options.

In other words ...

[dkleinsc]

'the idea that developers are the kings of IT and set the agenda for web companies, who in turn, set the agenda for the whole industry,'

So what they meant to say was: Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!

$1500 for a 1366x768 TN display.

[Anonymous Coward]

Are you frickin' kidding me? If I'm going to spend nearly 2 grand after taxes on a laptop, then I expect something better than what I can expect to get off the shelf at walmart for $400.

Re:$1500 for a 1366x768 TN display.

[war4peace]

I'm not an American, but I know that: the thing I'm going to look at the most after I theoretically buy a laptop/ultrabook is the god damn SCREEN. And for that matter, the fact that it's fast and snappy is heavily counterbalanced by a shitty screen. The GP is right in a way.

Re:$1500 for a 1366x768 TN display.

[amorsen]

What good is an ultrabook if I have to bring a monitor along to use it?

1366x768 is a good resolution for a 5" phone, and usable for a 7" tablet.

Re:$1500 for a 1366x768 TN display.

[ducomputergeek]

This laptop I walked in and said "I want one with the non-glare display". Processor speed, ram, etc were things I found I didn't really care about (I was going to go to Crucial and max it out aftermarket anyway). The applications I'm running most of the time are Xcode, Visual Studio, and Eclipse (yes it is a MacBook Pro).

Hell I got home and had to open up the hardware screen just to see what I had bought (Quad Core i7).

Hmm. $50

[serviscope_minor]

So, if I buy the Linux version, I'm paying $50 to skip:
* Download an ISO (and wait).
* Convert it to a bootable USB image.
* Find a spare USB stick and shove the image on.
* Open the installer, click a bunch of stuff and wait for the install.

It's not hard. Typically takes maybe 0.5 to 2 hours depending mostly on the speed of your internet connection and whether you can find a spare USB stick.

Still, you can pay $50 to avoid an hour's work. Seems reasonable.

Especially to the crows of "time is money" whiners who claim that they only don't use Linux because of the time taken to set it up.

In response to the higher price

[Picardo85]

Alright, so they've put Ubuntu, a free OS with free applications on their computer instead of Windows. So why is it more expensive then you ask?

Well the simple explanation would actually be because it doesn't have Windows. With Windows you get the so called bloatware or trialware which is included with the installation at in almost 100% of the cases.

The software in question is there as marketing from the companies who've created that software and they pay DELL and other OEMs for the opportunity to have it installed on their machines. Hence if the operating system doesn't support their products and they can't be installed it means that they won't buy this "ad space" and that in turn leads to DELL losing out on money.

That is the simple answer to why OSS laptops are more expensive than Windows laptops

And for $50 more than that, a MacBook Air

[sootman]

13", 1.8 GHz i5 (up to 2.8 GHz), 8 GB, 256 GB, US$1599.

Not trolling, asking seriously: how much difference is there between an i5 and an i7? A 2 GHz i7 Air (up to 3.2 GHz -- a little higher than this XPS) is another $100.

Also, from the Ars article: "All of the additions Dell is bringing to Ubuntu 12.04 are available for free (as in beer)." So could you just buy the Windows version and configure it yourself to save $50?

Competition and pricing

[DragonWriter]

Practically? This clearly demonstrates that it pays for the windows license and is also a revenue stream.

Or, it demonstrates that there isn't a lot of competition in the market for manufacturer-optimized linux-installed laptops, and that Dell is using the lack of competition in that market to extract rents. The idea that prices can be expected to closely mirror manufacturer costs is correct so far as the expected long-term result in a competitive market where no player is pricing based on influencing some other market, but its not necessarily true in the short run, or when there is little competition for a specific class of good, or where there are market participants that are using one product to draw people into another market.

Supporting Linux is not free

[Andtalath]

Supporting Linux is not free.

Neither is windows of course, but the point is, they don't just preload it, they test it and they have to be able to tell customers exactly how things work and so forth.

This requires a special treatment.

Buying a computer without any operating system should be cheaper, buying a computer with an internally developed system should be more expensive.

Nope, don't see the problem here.

No Microsoft Funds

[Ngarrang]

Microsoft is essentially paying a large builder like Dell to put Windows on the systems. Linux, on the other hand, has no one paying Dell, so that $50 premium probably represents the loss those marketing dollars.

Read the description, you are missing much more

[SuperKendall]

So, if I buy the Linux version, I'm paying $50 to skip:

No.

You are not paying to skip anything.

From the sound of it, you are paying for a slightly customized Linux build with a lot of really well thought out features, like work "profiles" that load software tailored to certain kinds of work - the example given was Ruby developers.

Between Dell making sure the drivers work well with all of the hardware involved, and doing custom improvements over Linux tailored to developers you are not paying to skip anything - you are paying just $50 more to make sure you have a really good developer laptop.

This is the first non Mac laptop I've been interested in for years. This is a really, really smart move on the part of Dell and I can't help but think we'll see more things like it with PC makers looking to edge away from Microsoft somewhat now that MS is competing on hardware.

Wait wait...

[Charliemopps]

Everyone calm down. It's only $50. Imagine for a second if it were $50 cheaper than the Windows version... All of Dells usual idiot customers would show up, find the computer, do a search for the model... see this linux thing... "Save $50?!?! Hell yea!" and order it... Once it arrives and they boot it up and try to install their casino poker game... they call up Dell support... "What do you mean I can't install this?!?!"

Dell NEEDS to put a barrier between the average customer and a product that could cause them a lot of support costs. They need to do their very best to make sure that only people who know what they are buying get this laptop. Money is the easiest way to do that. If you don't want to pay the $50, just order the windows version and wipe it when it arrives. It's not that hard.