Slashdot Mirror


NASA: Curiosity Has Found Plastic On Mars

dsinc writes "Last week Curiosity was able to use its SAM (Sample Analysis at Mars) device to confirm the discovery. A robotic arm with a complex system of Spectral Analysis devices was able to vaporize and identify gasses from the sample, concluding that it is in fact plastic. How plastic formed or ended up on the Martian surface is quite an exciting mystery that sparks many questions. The type of plastic sampled as we know so far can only be formed using petrochemicals, meaning not only that there could possibly be a source of oil on the Red Planet, but that somehow it got turned into plastic. Even more interesting is that oil or petrochemicals used to create this type of plastic are only known to come from ancient fossilized organic materials, such as zooplankton and algae, which geochemical processes convert into oil pointing to the earthshaking evidence that there was once life on mars. 'Right now we have multiple working hypotheses, and each hypothesis makes certain predictions about things like what the spherules are made of and how they are distributed,' said Curiosity's principal investigator, Steve Squyres, of Cornell University. 'Our job as we explore Matijevic Hill in the months ahead will be to make the observations that will let us test all the hypotheses carefully, and find the one that best fits the observations.'" Update: Yes, it's a hoax

16 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What is the probability? by NemosomeN · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you had read the article, you would have seen the photo, which is several strings of Mardi Gras beads on the Martian surface.

    --
    I hate grammar Nazi's.
  2. LMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    TROLLD HARD

    Slashdot is a joke..

  3. Hoax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This article posted is almost copied verbatim from http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/20120928a.html, with only a few words changed around. Plus, the css pages link offsite and are broken on that page. Who fell for this?

  4. Hoax by zienth · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hoax. The press release at http://nasaupdatecenter.us/press.html says that Curiosity is at Matijevic Hill, overlooking Endeavour Crater. Curiosity is inside of Gale Crater. Opportunity is at Matijevic Hill. Nasa posts its press releases at nasa.gov sites.

  5. Slashdot has been trolled by johnny+cashed · · Score: 5, Informative

    That isn't a genuine press release. Here is the real release: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/news/whatsnew/index.cfm?FuseAction=ShowNews&NewsID=1398

  6. FAKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Domain Name NASAUPDATECENTER.US
    Domain ID D38204419-US
    Sponsoring Registrar ENOM, INC.
    Registrar URL (registration services) whois.enom.com
    Domain Status clientTransferProhibited
    Registrant ID A82B3BEE4769052E
    Registrant Name Xavier Jenks
    Registrant Organization NASA
    Registrant Address1 PO Box 791633
    Registrant City Cape Carnival
    Registrant State/Province FL
    Registrant Postal Code 666666
    Registrant Country United States
    Registrant Country Code US
    Registrant Phone Number +1.5043193013
    Registrant Email admin@nasaupdatecenter.us

    http://www.facebook.com/xavier.jenks -- Head researcher at New Orleans Bigfoot Society.

  7. Fake by Hentes · · Score: 4, Informative

    From NASA:

    The next news conference about the NASA Mars rover Curiosity will be held at 9 a.m. Monday, Dec. 3, in San Francisco at the Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union (AGU).

      Rumors and speculation that there are major new findings from the mission at this early stage are incorrect. The news conference will be an update about first use of the rover's full array of analytical instruments to investigate a drift of sandy soil. One class of substances Curiosity is checking for is organic compounds -- carbon-containing chemicals that can be ingredients for life. At this point in the mission, the instruments on the rover have not detected any definitive evidence of Martian organics.

  8. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The domain was registered on Nov 23. Very suspicious.

  9. Re:Editors... by NFN_NLN · · Score: 3, Informative

    I thought the real announcement was NASA found water and organic matter on venus:
    http://gizmodo.com/5964357/nasa-finds-water-and-organic-matter-in-mercury?tag=astronomy

  10. Bigfoot by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Informative

    I might also point out that "Xavier Jenks" also runs a website about bigfoot.

    But sure, he's totally the kind of reliable source we've come to expect on Slashdot.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  11. Re:Editors... by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you think that's bad, the slashdot article last week that claimed that NASA was about to announce some big discovery on mars was also fake, or at least really REALLY exaggerated.

    http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2012/11/27/nasa_mars_discovery_misunderstanding_mission_leader_excited_about_entire.html

    You know whats sad, is the submitter commented that this article was fake before samzenpus moved it to the front page. Apparently some editors don't read the comments either. I'd say it more resembles digg.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  12. Score:5? Venus is not Mercury by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 3, Informative

    The ice was found on Mercury.

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  13. Re:Editors... by girlintraining · · Score: 1, Informative

    I thought the real announcement was NASA found water and organic matter on venus

    Dude, you realize that if you took a pizza out of your freezer and held it up in the air on the surface of Venus, it would cook in about 8 seconds, right? Which is 7.98 seconds longer than it would take for the atmosphere to turn you (and the pizza) into a pancake and then spray your liquified remains about a half-kilometer downwind. I'd be very interested to hear about the technology NASA invented that would be capable of landing anything in such an inhospitable environment... or for that matter, simply making it to the surface still intact and somehow managing to communicate this fact to us.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  14. Re:Editors... by Trep · · Score: 5, Informative

    If this is some kind of joke that I'm missing, then I apologize. But if you are serious...then try googling first. The Russians did this a long time ago. AFAIK, NASA never attempted a lander though. Venera 13, in 1982, lasted about 2 hours before giving up the ghost.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venera

  15. Re:Editors... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Informative
  16. Re:Editors... by ByteSlicer · · Score: 3, Informative

    It seems you never saw the cool (or should I say hot) pictures taken by the Soviet landers on Venus, so here you go.
    But yeah, it's extremely hostile. Curiosity most probably wouldn't make it to the surface.