Slashdot Mirror


Just Say No To College

Hugh Pickens writes writes "Alex Williams writes in the NY Times that the idea that a college diploma is an all-but-mandatory ticket to a successful career is showing fissures. Inspired by role models like the billionaire drop-outs who founded Microsoft, Facebook, Dell, Twitter, Tumblr, and Apple, and empowered by online college courses, a groundswell of university-age heretics consider themselves a DIY vanguard, committed to changing the perception of dropping out from a personal failure to a sensible option, at least for a certain breed of risk-embracing maverick. 'Here in Silicon Valley, it's almost a badge of honor,' says Mick Hagen, 28, who dropped out of Princeton in 2006 and moved to San Francisco, where he started Undrip, a mobile app. 'College puts a lot of constraints, a lot of limitations around what you can and can't do. Some people, they want to stretch their arms, get out and create more, do more.' Perhaps most famously, Peter A. Thiel, the billionaire co-founder of PayPal, in 2010 started his Thiel Fellowship program, which pays students under 20 years old $100,000 apiece to bag college and pursue their own ventures. 'People are being conned into thinking that this credential is the one thing you need to do better in life. They typically are worse off, because they have amassed all this debt.' UnCollege advocates a DIY approach to higher education and spreads the message through informational 'hackademic camps.' 'Hacking,' in the group's parlance, can involve any manner of self-directed learning: travel, volunteer work, organizing collaborative learning groups with friends. Students who want to avoid $200,000 in student-loan debt might consider enrolling in a technology boot camp, where you can learn to write code in 8 to 10 weeks for about $10,000. 'I think kids with a five-year head start on equally ambitious peers will be ahead in both education and income,' says James Altucher, a prominent investor, entrepreneur and pundit who self-published a book called '40 Alternatives to College.' 'They could go to a library, read a book a day, take courses online. There are thousands of ways.'"

48 of 716 comments (clear)

  1. Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by crazyjj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First of all, most of those "billionaire dropouts" were dropouts from Ivy League schools with plenty of startup money from daddy already at their disposal, not dipshits coming out of no-name-high-school. Secondly, most of them only left college when they already had contacts and solid plans (and financing) in place for starting their own businesses. They didn't need degrees because they were going to be hiring *themselves*, not having to worry about some HR department that will toss any non-degree applicants right into the trash.

    For most of the non-rich, non-Ivy League assholes like the rest of us--we still need a college degree if we're going to get beyond the front door to any stable job. We're not Mark Zuckerberg or Bill Gates.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by ByOhTek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yep. If you drop out with your cash-cow already moo-ving (sorry, had too)... You are taking a huge risk, and just as likely to end up on the street or in your parents basement.

      A college degree isn't a surefire way to become rich, or even get a job, but it does improve your odds of at least getting a decent paycheck. The world cannot support everyone being a billionaire entrepreneur - and for those who don't have the ideas, or just get them too late, college is a good way to increase the odds of a decent 'consolation prize' to not being a billionaire entrepreneur.

      My guess is that the people promoting this want one thing: cheap, desperate labor, which these dropouts would become, when the majority of them fail to be successful.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by fredprado · · Score: 5, Informative

      You certainly don't need it, but it helps. If it helps enough to compensate the additional time spent on it depends on what you plan to do though. In some areas, for examples, you must have a specific graduation degree to be even allowed in.

      I agree that it would be much more sensible and fair if you were always judged by what you know and not by what title you have, but unfortunately that is not always the case.

    3. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by Manmademan · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Exactly.

      Let's be honest, the skyrocketing cost of college and debt are very real issues, but a $200,000 bill for a bachelor's degree is extremely rare. Your average state university might be a quarter of that, and the cost can go even lower if one starts at a community or junior college and transfers in.

      Now, if you're talking $200,000 for a BA plus the cost of a graduate degree like an MS, M.D, PHD, or JD- that's a completely separate issue as those fields are entirely off limits to those without advanced degrees. "good skills" without the degree won't allow you to practice law, medicine, or teach at a university level.

      The article summary also concentrates on the argument that "learning to code" doesn't take a four year degree, and perhaps it doesn't- but the american workforce consists of far more than just coders, and its very likely that if said coders want to advance up the corporate ladder later in their careers, the lack of a degree is going to stop them dead in their tracks. The article fails to note that the unemployment rate for those with just a high school degree is three times higher than those with a bachelor's degree- 12% vs 4% or so. You can't ignore a statistic like that, and a large part of the reason why is that HR departments and Recruiters are in the habit of asking for a BA by default and will automatically trash a resume that lacks it, despite how good one's skills may be.

      The "skip college' argument is extremely short sighted here, ignores the realities of the hiring landscape, and is really only useful advice for a very, very small percentage of those looking to start businesses.

    4. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. It is like saying, "you don't need to get a job and work for a living because you can take those last $5 you have and win the lottery with it." Newsflash for them: most people don't win the lottery. Most people can't just drop out of college and become rich either.

    5. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most people aren't born with adequate amounts of (1) or (2). That's why they go to college: To get those things.

      This whole "skip college, be your own tech mogul" theory sounds like the thousands of inner-city kids who all think that their ticket out of the ghetto is to become an NBA star. Sure, it works for a couple of dozen of lucky people per year, but for the rest, it's an abysmal failure.

    6. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by halltk1983 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Saddling people with soul-crushing debt to pay for an education is a great way to make them desperate. Myself, I went into IT, where my skills and abilities, earned me my current job (and the last 4). They then paid to get me a couple certs. They also pay me well above the median household income, and allow me to work from home, all because I was able to demonstrate my ability. The key is to find a field you don't mind working in that needs workers. Electricians, plumbers, welders, mechanics... the world needs more of these. They make more than most college graduates, after 4 years of getting paid instead of paying to learn a craft. The ideal that you're espousing, that anyone that doesn't pay for a degree or have rich parents is doomed to fail is complete bollocks. It just takes effort, drive, and a willingness to work for what you want.

      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
    7. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by impossiblefork · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that you're very wrong here.

      Take me for an example. I'm a computer scientist who have also studied financial mathematics (mostly focusing on the problem of pricing derivatives). I probably have at least technical skill (even if one can't very easily be sure of that, trying to assess it oneself). However, until I finish my thesis and graduate I definitely won't have anything but (perhaps glorified) internships.

      The degree really matters. Especially if you want to work in anything in which your professional decisions have consequences for people- like in finance, engineering, medicine, aerospace, or almost anything interesting or technical.

    8. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Need? No. Improves the odds of getting past HR? Yes.

    9. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I agree a GREAT deal with what you said....but it mostly applies to people that have a little resume experience under their belt already.

      If you're going to work to start your own business, no, you don't need a college degree.

      However, for most "real" jobs, starting out....especially in tech, but most any field I know of, if you don't have at least a bachelors degree in something, your resume won't even be evaluated. Sad but true.

      Today, the bachelors resume is what a few decades ago, a HS diploma was....it is the first weed out requirement for most any job.

      There are exceptions to the rule, but I posit in the real world out there today, very few exceptions. A college degree and contacts are your best two weapons to get your foot in the door.

      But once in that interview....and going foward with the job, I can tell you that often great people skills will put you ahead of people that are strictly tech skills.

      You still see the stereotype of tech types being somewhat introverted and uncomfortable even holding non-formal conversations with their co-workers and bosses. If you have a good personality, gift of gab, and enough intelligence to know most of what your doing, that will take you a LONG way in your professional career.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The become a tech billionaire thing is exactly like pro sports. Occasionally someone makes it big but the vast majority of people who try are going to end up disappointed, 30, and with nothing to fall back on.

      Plus low-skill tech is a maturing industry. Zuckerberg and the app millionaires got in at the beginning. Normally in tech you need a lot more knowledge than they have (or a lot of money, or both). Jobs was a sales genius, backed up by an electronics genius and again, lucky and in the right place at the right time.

    11. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yep. If you drop out with your cash-cow already moo-ving (sorry, had too)... You are taking a huge risk, and just as likely to end up on the street or in your parents basement.

      A college degree isn't a surefire way to become rich, or even get a job, but it does improve your odds of at least getting a decent paycheck. The world cannot support everyone being a billionaire entrepreneur - and for those who don't have the ideas, or just get them too late, college is a good way to increase the odds of a decent 'consolation prize' to not being a billionaire entrepreneur.

      My guess is that the people promoting this want one thing: cheap, desperate labor, which these dropouts would become, when the majority of them fail to be successful.

      A college degree isn't a sure fire way to get rich but it is rather difficult to get rich in the tech industry without people that have a college degree or some other form of higher education. I am really tired of people trash talking college education and then pointing at a selection of cherry-picked individuals like Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, Dell, Jobs etc. as if they somehow constitute conclusive proof of the fact that we can disband our Universities. Now it may very well be that you don't need to be college educated to found a start-up that grows into a multi billion dollar high-tech megacorp but I wonder how far any of these people would have gotten without people that have a college degree? Does Dell rely upon self-educated people to design and manufacture components for their computers? Does Microsoft / Apple software get written by people who learned to program from "Teach your self in 7 days" guides (Ok, sometimes I wonder about those last two but but I happen to know what kind of people work for these two companies and trust me they are mostly educated pros). I think that the likes of Gates, Zuckerberg, Dell, Jobs were just as lucky as they were 'mega talented visionary dropouts' and that applies particularly to the first two. I will give Michael Dell credit for having an natural talent and feel for logistics, and Jobs, whatever else you may think of him, had an uncanny nose for products with great potential (the whole iPod/Phone/Pad line) as well as companies with great potential, like Pixar for example. People thought Jobs was nuts when he bought Pixar.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    12. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by nebosuke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I went to Harvard and dropped out after my first year not due to having a great startup idea, but having to deal with family issues. I'm also not a trust-fund baby, as neither of my parents has a college degree, my mom's family business was destroyed by a natural distaster when I was a small kid, and my dad has always been a blue-collar worker in a low-paid line of work. My family qualified for food stamps and subsidised lunches but my parents wouldn't take either (and they're dyed-in-the-wool liberal democrats--imagine that). I grew up paying for my own school supplies, field trips, etc., from the money I made selling crops that I grew personally--my dad funded my initial startup in terms of seedstock and about $80 of fertilizer in lieu of allowance for working on the farm.

      I started my post-dropout career at a $11/hr job technically classified as temporary field labor. There I helped my boss write a field data collection/productivity app on what was the closest thing to a hand-held tablet (the 2004-version of a CF-07 from Panasonic).

      Second move was to a different company as a temp for $20/hr--also still considered field labor but I was expected to be able to operate a gps unit. There I set up their entire GIS system and surrounding business processes from scratch.

      Several years later and I'm now in a full-time position (which had been advertised as "MBA + X years experience required") with that second company managing planning for regional operations and developing strategy and processes for a global multi-9-figure operations unit. Working on a degree through University of Phoenix just to get the piece of paper--but even when I do it'll be useless because I'm already at a level that requires at least a masters per formal requirements.

      In short, it can be done. That being said, HR fought my initial hire as a full-time employee, and one person even made it her personal mission to limit my promotions and pay and to try to exclude me from consideration for potential promotions. The only reason I advanced the way I did was because my managers personally and specifically fought HR on my behalf. If I had the MBA and hadn't had that resistance from HR I'd be paid double what I'm paid today at the very least.

      Here's my advice. If you are willing to start at the bottom, and earn recognition via tangible accomplishments, you can make a career in corporate America without a degree. It will require that you not only outperform your credentialed peers by orders of magnitude, but also build very strong professional relationships on the business management side such that your manager+3 will be willing to boot stomp HR on your behalf. You will in all likelihood still be undercompensated unless you are willing to jump ship and objectively prove your desirability as demonstrated by other companies headhunting you. As that is largely opposed to developing strong relationships with your managers, this is a delicate balancing act. If you are willing and able to do the same while actually having a degree you will earn much more $ at almost any large corporation . Also, do not kid yourself--people actually learn stuff in college, so you have to be willing to actively self-educate in order to be competitive.

      If you want to start your own business in an industry that is not heavily credential-sensitive, and you have a capitlization plan that does not involve stuffy bankers and conservative investors, and feel that you can spare 4 - 6 years gaining experience, I absolutely recommend jumping in to industry and reading Drucker, Kaplan and Norton, etc. on your own as opposed to getting a degree. 4 - 6 years in a real career will be much more valuable than a degree once you're your own boss.

      If you will "only" be a highly competent and consistent performer looking for a decent, stable job, GET A DEGREE.

    13. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      *this* so much!!!!

      Lets look at it by the numbers.

      There are 320+ million people in the US. Of those about ~1000 of them will 'hit it big in business'. That is about .000003%. Of that ~1000 or so people a small percentage 'dropped out'.

      So we are look at anomalies and saying 'this is the way to do it'?

      Bill Gates/Zuckerberg dropped out because their business was taking too much of their time to finish. You can 100% bet if they had failed they would have went back and finished.

      They were already driven. They had already started something. To say 'dont go at all' is silly. For example Zuckerberg would not have even started facebook if he had not gone. Same for Gates.

      I have over the years met maybe 2-3 people who are driven enough to start their own business in that way. I have met hundreds who start them to just 'make money' or dodge taxes in some way.

      You also have to have passion about what you are doing. They love making money and screwing someone out of a buck. It takes a certain mindset that most people I have met do not have. Oh sure people like having money (because it buys them things). These guys like just having money and there is never enough.

      They are the guys who in highscool is selling pencils, pens, paper, and snacks out of his locker to make some money. Not your average schmo who just wants to graduate and get the hell out of there. He sees an opportunity not a chore. Everyone is a possible customer who will give them money.

    14. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by vlm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The become a tech billionaire thing is exactly like pro sports. Occasionally someone makes it big but the vast majority of people who try are going to end up disappointed, 30, and with nothing to fall back on.

      Humorously, you've just described the "higher ed industrial complex", although you forgot to mention due to explosive growth in tuition its now horrifically expensive compared to the expense of becoming a wanna be basketball star.

      There's nothing wrong with higher ed, other than costing too much. I like that my coffee barista and waitress both have 4-year degrees. Education gives life meaning, it gives you a lifetime of interesting things to think about, if you bother to pay attention, anyway. The problem with my barista and waitress having 4 year diplomas is they paid WAY too much money and thought they were getting middle class job training, when all they got was debt and an education and no job. If only they could have paid $200/semester like my parents paid for personal enrichment, that would be a perfectly good situation..

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    15. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by SydShamino · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You don't need a college degree if you have these two things:

      1) Technical Skills - The skills actually needed to do your job. Essential.

      2) People Skills - The skills to actually talk to people and convince them that you're not an idiot. Convincing people that you're worth the time and the money is the 2nd most important skill you can have.

      I'm making more money than all of my 4-year degree friends because I decided long ago to educate myself in a field that's likely to GROW (and not things like art history, where you go to school just to teach other kids, so they can teach other kids, and so on) and because I can talk to people and have them see me as an asset and not a potential liability.

      So really you need at least three things - the two you numbered above, plus

      3) A desire to work in a field where money is thrown at anyone, not just college graduates.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    16. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      " It fucking depends on you."

      That's about the size of it. College is great for some people, military is better for others, entrepreneurship for others, and just getting an entry-level job out of high school for others still. There's no "right path" for everyone. College will provide more opportunities for the vast majority of people (assuming they think about the school and degree they choose before committing), but no, it's not right for everyone. I've seen many people flounder and fail with a college degree, I've seen many people succeed without one and I've seen quite a few put off college until their 30's or later when they've already established themselves in their field of choice (an option many people overlook but it certainly valid).

    17. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by SydShamino · · Score: 5, Informative

      Along the same lines as your point:
      All Of Nation's Resources Dumped Into 50 Children Who Are Actually The Future
      If we could just cherry pick those kids now, we wouldn't need to worry about everyone else! ~sarcasm

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    18. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by wisnoskij · · Score: 5, Informative

      To first get to talk to people, they need to pick you out of 100 other resumes.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    19. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by Zephyn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Now that you mention it, people were saying the college degree was a waste of time in the mid-to-late 90s as well, although tech jobs were so plentiful then that they actually were hiring people right out of high school.

      Then when the bubble burst, the lucky ones found themselves in a dead end job with no degree. Most of them didn't get to keep the job.

    20. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by dintech · · Score: 5, Funny

      In some areas, for examples, you must have a specific graduation degree to be even allowed in.

      "Who needs a real doctor when you got my machines and their scary needles?"

    21. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree that it would be much more sensible and fair if you were always judged by what you know and not by what title you have, but unfortunately that is not always the case.

      I'd also like to judge people on their ability to think, to listen to others, research existing knowledge, to appraise and weight up ideas, and this is a large part of what college teaches. This goes beyond 'knowing stuff' and 'people skills' (although these are undoubtedly important).

    22. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It just takes effort, drive, and a willingness to work for what you want.

      Thought about using modpoints, decided to pick up on this point instead, just because it's a common and very misleading argument.

      Yes, step one to success is effort and drive, as well as having a vision of what you want to achieve. But that's just step one. To take the NBA example for inner city kids: they all believe that all it takes is hard work and determination. Little do they know that millions of others also have that. It also takes athleticism - or at least height - fine motor control and good hand-eye coordination. Actually, to play in the NBA, it takes exceptional levels of at least one of these. If all you have is effort and drive, you will be a side note in your high school's hall of fame. And on top of that, you need luck: don't blow your ACL in high school and get bad care for it. Don't get hit by a bus. Don't be forced to pick of a McDonald's job because you need to support your family in high school. And don't be subject to chronic injuries, for whatever genetic/random reason. See Greg Oden as the poster child for how that can kill your NBA career.

      Same thing in tech. If you don't have the brains and ability to absorb code and technical documentation all day long, all your drive and vision won't help. If you can't schmooze people, forget about leading a business. And that's why I think that people like Thiel are well-intentioned, but doing much more harm than good. They're the equivalent of the basketball clinics, but instead of just saying "here, you'll be a better basketball player if you pay us", they're saying "we'll make you an NBA star".

      In short: not everyone can be a business mogul, and there's nothing wrong with it. We need to stop telling people that a) they will be if they work hard enough, and b) they're not a business mogul only because they're lazy. Neither of those statements are true, and they're behind a good chunk of the problems the US is facing.

      That said....

      Electricians, plumbers, welders, mechanics... the world needs more of these. They make more than most college graduates, after 4 years of getting paid instead of paying to learn a craft.

      More people should take this to heart. There's nothing wrong with being a blue-collar worker. Some of those jobs pay very well. Notice though: some of them do. You can pull down $150k as a welder, but it's hard, technical work that you won't be doing forever.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    23. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by locketine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are cheap but excellent schools out there. I paid 12k/year (all-inclusive) for an engineering degree that paid for itself in just one year. The people with all this debt aren't good higher education shoppers, both in terms of school selection but also degree selection. Or maybe they just weren't cut out for getting one of the degrees that actually pays off.

      --
      Think globally but act within local variable scope.
    24. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and this is a large part of what college teaches.

      As an employer, I only wish that were true. I find myself far more amazed by people who self-educated than people who put themselves through college and received crushing debts in return.

      Remember, information and education aren't restricted to formal education environments.

    25. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      exactly. what I've noticed from my many friends without college degrees or any education above high school is that they don't like to hear or discuss things. They've fixated on ideas and concepts and that is it. And then they tend to lack critical thinking when issues come up. In general, any secondary education seems to expose people to many different ideas and concepts and it builds critical thinking methods and processes many would not ever get without it.

      Not everyone needs a secondary education but it sure helps many. And then there's the lottery.

    26. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by Drethon · · Score: 5, Informative

      I paid about half a year's starting wage for my degree in computer engineering. I don't think the problem is college, I think the problem is people thinking they have to spend ridiculous sums of money for it.

    27. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by strikethree · · Score: 5, Insightful

      1) Technical Skills - The skills actually needed to do your job. Essential.

      Irrelevant. Lots of morons getting paid well that can't do shit. Lots of highly skilled folks underemployed.

      2) People Skills - The skills to actually talk to people and convince them that you're not an idiot. Convincing people that you're worth the time and the money is the 2nd most important skill you can have.

      Absolutely; however, if you never get the chance to talk to someone, does it really matter?

      I am in a similar position to you: No degree and making much more than most of my "friends" who did get a four year degree. Let's be real here, there was a large chunk of luck involved to even get where we are regardless of the primary two skills that you listed.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    28. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by StormyWeather · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ^^THIS!!!

      What I get so frustrated by is that there is this mentality that people can somehow "fall back" on a degree. That's bullshit. There are tons of people with degrees and even advanced degrees selling refrigerators at Sears. A degree doesn't magically bestow ANYTHING. People that think they have a degree and somehow get to start a rung higher than someone without one are sadly mistaken as well. One of my best friends used to bitch nonstop about how he had his masters degree, and his boss only had a high school degree. One day after a few beers I had enough of it and said "Look, you went to school for 7 years, he started two businesses after high school, both failed, but he learned a lot from his failures, then went to work making nothing as a call center manager, worked his way up the management chain reading books on it, and going to conferences to get better at it. His trade is management, yours is Java development, and just because he is your boss doesn't mean he automatically makes more money than you. Great developers are harder to hire and fire than great managers." He never said crap about it again.

      College now is the high school diploma of years past. It's good, but it's a fairly cheap commodity now. If someone doesn't have one, then they are just missing a cheap commodity.

      Yes I have a bachelors degree, and no I don't think it's really helped me at all.

    29. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have the perfect example of that. I applied for a job that required a B.A. in a particular area even though I did not have it because I have a doctorate degree in that field. Well, turns out a friend of my father worked for that company and was the person who made the hiring decision. A few months later, my dad introduced us at a meet and greet and he asked my why I didn't apply. I told him I did and his reply is that he definitely would have remembered seeing a doctorate but all he got to choose from was 5 B.A.s. He found out, after a little digging that tons of people with a B.S. in that area as well as myself and a few other master and doctorate degrees did not even make it onto his desk because the resume scanner threw us all out because we didn't have a B.A. in that field.

    30. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is an issue here.

      People with degrees have a lower unemployment rate than those without.

      So, statistically, it makes a difference.

    31. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Listening to others is some fields is a liability instead of an asset.

      No, it is not. The ability to listening to others is never a liability. You seem to be confusing "never makes a decision without polling the public, and goes whichever way the wind blows," with "actively seeking out and understanding other peoples' perspectives and input."

      There is NO 'anti-social savant programmer' who is better at his job because of his inability to listen to other people. If he functions at a high level, it is because he is smart enough to function at a high level *despite* his handicap, not *because of* his handicap.

    32. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by adonoman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's worse than pro-sports. In pro-sports, at least, there are amateur leagues in place that do a pretty good job at identifying and developing the best of the best. There's no doubt that Gates and Zuckerberg are talented, but they're talented in the way that pro basketball players were talented in the 1940s. When your selection pool starts out by excluding 99%+ of the population due to lack of wealth or connections, you severly limit the number of superstars you'll be able to find.

    33. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by Rakarra · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Listening to others is sometimes a hindrance and a sign of indecisiveness.

      Doing what others tell you to do and being unable to formulate and defend your own opinions and decisions is a hindrance and a sign of indecisiveness. Listening is not. Those are not the same thing.

    34. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by malkavian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, it's definitely not. Opinions have information. The sign of someone who really knows what they're on about is the person who listens, sifts, and then makes a decision based on that. Listening doesn't mean rule by committee; it just means you're acting with all the information you can get, which leads to a more informed choice.
      The person that "knows" what to do can get it disastrously wrong, and frequently does.

    35. Re:Did Zuckerberg ever have to get past HR? by s73v3r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Listening to others is some fields is a liability instead of an asset.

      There is absolutely no field where this is true. If you don't have the comprehension to know what to do with what you listened to, that's a different problem.

  2. Don’t get me wrong by Anrego · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I’m all for the elimination of college/university as an almost necessity to get a decent job.

    That said, for every tech millionaire dropout, there are probably 1000 guys with good technical knowledge eking out a living on a hell desk. At a minimum, not having a degree is going to make things harder and reduce your options. Again, for every small startup you can wow with your cool open source contributions, there's a dozen companies who will just shredder your resume (and before you say "who wants to work for such a company", keep in mind HR is usually not reflective of the working environment at most places).

    Much as it sucks, I still think the best bet is to learn on your own, then sweat out the degree.

    Then again, here in Canada tuitions are high but not insane. I worked a McJob part time through highschool, full time through summers, and was able to pay off the remainder of my debt fairly quickly after graduating.

    There is also something to be said about college/university as a good thing. It forces you to take stuff you’d have no interest in otherwise, there is some social development, you learn to deal with different personalities, etc..

  3. Drive by RichMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you have drive you can succeed by yourself.

    With high-school becoming a pat-on-the-back-thanks-for-showing-up affair college is what teaches people to knuckle under and get stuff done. If you need that lesson you need college.

  4. Look at statistics not the rock star stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The unemployment rate for college grads is half that of non-college grads. Yes, there are these billionaire dropouts, but they are the exception not the rule. Besides, if you're capable of having a billion dollar idea without a college degree, aren't you just as capable of having a billion dollar idea WITH a college degree? Why take the risk? Stay in school and have the best of both worlds.

  5. This is like skipping vaccines by jonnythan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This comes from the same mentality as people who skip vaccinating their children: we have a generation who grew up taking things for granted, so they feel free to reject the very things that gave them that privilege. Grow up without being surrounded by disease, and it feels safe to throw away vaccines. Grow up taking an educated populace for granted, and it feels safe to throw away college.

    It's also the same mentality that leads people to stop taking medications. I've seen so many people with seizure disorders stop taking their pills after a time because they don't have seizures anymore..... then immediately have seizures again. I know one person that died as a result of this.

    As a person who has gone to college, dropped out, and is now going back, I understand the value of the education and experience. It's not for everyone, but it really does have immense value. Very few people have the disposition and dedication to focus themselves and spend their time doing something better than college - most who drop out or don't go will spend their time doing something far less valuable.

  6. Outliers by Synarus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    See, but if you went to college you would learn that outliers exist in all populations. One should not make conclusions based on an outlier because they do not provide significant evidence for a result. If instead you look at the vast majority of successful people they have college degrees. That being said there is evidence that certain programs such as vocational or even Ivy League programs have negative effects of certain subsets of the work force. But let's try not to make grandiose claims on faulty evidence.

  7. multiple options by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Skipping college and starting your own blockbuster company is an option, much like winning the lottery is an option, or being born with millionaire parents is an option.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  8. Choose your college wisely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Up here in Canuckistan, 'college' means Community College. Community Colleges are mandated (in Ontario at least) to serve the local job market. That means that if there aren't jobs in a particular field, there should not be a college program.

    In other words, if you attend a community college, you have a very good chance of getting a job. Some programs have 100% job placement year after year. The statistics are available, you can check the graduate placement and starting salaries before you enrol.

    In my particular program, we often get university graduates who can't get jobs. Community Colleges don't get nearly enough respect.

  9. What College Are You Talking About Here? by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Students who want to avoid $200,000 in student-loan debt

    Yeah, I don't know how this happens. I mean, I know how it happens ... you go to a school on the East Coast so you have the name on your resume. I went to the University of Minnesota in the Twin Cities for four years and came out with $20,000 in loans (worked three jobs in college). A coworker's cousin just graduated from George Washington in DC and came out with $250,000 in loans. Tuition rates at the University of Minnesota versus tuition rates at GWU (note that those are per credit hour! and they don't give you every credit over 13 free like they do at the U of MN).

    Frankly, I think this article should be titled, "skip the overly expensive college because you'll get a more than adequate education somewhere else." Okay so I have to prove myself in an interview over someone from GWU. Challenge accepted.

    And if everyone drops out of college to start their own thing, who are you going to be hiring when your startup needs to transition to a medium to large company? Other dropouts whose ideas were crap. Are you sure you want to advocate this to be a more widespread phenomenon?

    --
    My work here is dung.
  10. HR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please, do tell of all those Silicon Valley kids who didn't make it. Or the drop-outs who didn't go into CS? How do they get their foot in the door with HR? Those kids who "made it" were very bright to begin with, and they had an opportunity they couldn't pass up by the time they dropped out. What the article is saying is if you drop out, opportunities will come - that's the mentality of every actor trying to "make it" in Hollywood.

    I have a certain set of skill that unfortunately aren't too profitable. I'm not in CS nor in dog-walking (as the article suggests). I don't have the aptitude to be a cop. But my skills require a college degree to get my foot in the door. The problem isn't college, but the HR system. And unfortunately, I'm not as bright as Bill Gates or Zuckerberg (both who went to Harvard) to make up the diploma deficit with talent. I went to a state university and as the world goes, pretty average.

    What annoys me the most of all, are the examples cited in the article. I bet most, if not all, the kids came from an affluent background, where if they fail there would be a financial safety net from the parents. As for me, I saved up and only had one shot. I tried my hand and didn't make it. My life has changed now where I'd have to save up again for a couple of years for another shot in entrepreneurial career success or start a family.

    God, I hate articles like these. It just feeds into every high school kids' fantasies into never going to college and think they can make it big. Opportunity follows talent, not the other way around.

  11. Yeah, right. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's amusing that people would advocate this when statistics show that college graduates not only face a lower unemployment rate, but they average higher incomes as well.

      As others have pointed out, you'll notice that the successful entrepreneurs who dropped out either went to ivy league schools or had wealthy parents. Even if they had to scrape for their own money, their backgrounds conferred instant confidence in their abilities amongst anyone they approached. One of the most important aspects of a successful business, contacts, where there from the start.

    A second important factor here is that these guys were already actively engaged in whatever lead to their success. They would have been successful just the same had they completed college because the drive was already there. These aren't random students more interested in partying than schoolwork. But sure, let's perpetuate the idea that we don't need college so that we end up with an even bigger group of resentful individuals resentful for not having been multimillionaires.

    Of course, we should be talking about the cost of an education. College tuition is seriously overpriced but instead everyone harps on student loans. And the government backing those loans simply adds fuel to the fire, creating a massive bubble. Certainly, we should be looking at trade schools, but I think the real problem in the US is perception. Most people think trade schools are beneath them. But when you've got MBA's sucking everyone else dry in a race to bottom, who can blame them?

  12. smell a rat by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't need college if you're going to compete with $1/hr third world labor. You just need the ability to work 16 hours a day and not ask questions.

    You don't need college, son, but we've got a dormitory waiting for you.

    The past year, I've been reading a lot of these "You don't need college" stories, mostly in right-wing and pro-corporate media. I don't think it's coincidental.

    Nobody is telling Mitt Romney's kid that he doesn't need college, even though (guess what) he REALLY doesn't need college. In fact, it's one of the trending memes of 2012: "You fucking proles don't need college because there are pictures of cheeseburgers on the cash register buttons."

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  13. Re:Well the ITT / devry / UofP are more about job by PRMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because we've hired ITT/devry/UofP people in the past... When you advertise your college to losers in the middle of the night, you end up with a college full of losers.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...