Slashdot Mirror


27 Reported Killed In Connecticut Elementary School Shooting

Several readers sent word of a shooting at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut. According to most reports, 27 people are dead, including 18 children. The alleged shooter is dead, a man in his 20s. He was armed with multiple weapons and may have worn a bulletproof vest. According to CBS, "It is unclear if there was more than one gunman at the school. Miller reports authorities have an individual in custody who investigators said may be a possible second shooter." (Investigators now say the person being questioned is not a suspect.) One student was quoted as saying, "I was in the gym and I heard a loud, like seven loud booms, and the gym teachers told us to go in the corner, so we all huddled. And I kept hearing these booming noises. And we all started crying." Another, 8 years old, said, "I saw some of the bullets going down the hall and then a teacher pulled me into her classroom."

22 of 2,987 comments (clear)

  1. impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The school is a gun-free campus, plus all visitors have to register at the office.

  2. Re:Somebody's got to say it by Koreantoast · · Score: 4, Informative

    Automatic weapons are already rare and tightly controlled in the United States, and their "effectiveness" is questionable in these types of situations. No, you don't need anything fancy like that to create such a tragedy. A simple hunting rifle or handgun are all that one needs.

  3. Re:And yet... by hazah · · Score: 5, Informative

    Gun laws do nothing in making it harder for "fucking lunatics" to posess. There in lies the logical fallacy. It makes it for "fucking normal people" harder to posess, which is incidentily the root of the problem. It would have taken one normal individual to stop this idiot.

  4. rampage killers by AxemRed · · Score: 5, Informative

    It looks like the first few comments have already been about guns and the second amendment, so I want to throw this out there. There have been spree killings all over the world, even in countries with more restrictive gun laws than the USA. Most of these killings were done with firearms, but many were done with other weapons.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rampage_killers

    I think that rather than arguing about gun-rights in general, we would be better served by working to identify the kind of people that feel they need to resort to this type of violence and getting them the help they need before they snap.

  5. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The worst mass school murder in American history took place on May 18,1927 in Bath Township, Mich., when a former school board member set off three bombs that killed 45 people.

  6. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I only use my guns to shoot targets, an activity i enjoy thoroughly.

  7. Re:And yet... by mjr167 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I can go into a store today and buy everything needed to blow a building to bits. Remember Oklahoma City? If you don't want a big boom, you can always go the bleach and ammonia route. If you want to kill or maim people in mass quantities, you don't need a gun. You can use a car. Or a plane. I suppose banning planes is next?

  8. Re:And yet... by spyfrog · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a frequent misunderstanding of the European approach to weapons from your American understanding. You are simply indoctrinated by the gun lobby that Europe is wrong. There is NO shortage of weapons here in Europe. That is a blatant lie that your gun lobby tells you.
    However, what we don't have here is weapons aimed primarily at killing humans - like pistols and automatic weapons. You can own guns for hunting. Owning a rifle for hunting is common. You can also own a pistol for shooting in competition but you have to be a registered sportsman - you have to join a gun club and actually compete.
    You can even actually have a fully automatic assault rifle at home - but you have to join the voluntary armed forces.
    This system works and take out the crackpots. Selling pistol to anyone who wishes to have one doesn't.

  9. Re:And yet... by jammer170 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Perhaps you should consider the Akihabara massacre.

    To quote Penn and Teller, "You can stop insane people from doing insane things with insane laws. It's insane!"

    --
    Remember, you can't look dignified when your having fun! Don't take life too seriously, you'll never get out of it alive
  10. Bullshit by publiclurker · · Score: 4, Informative

    these "fucking lunatics" get their guns the same way so called sane gun nuts do.

  11. Re:Like propping up the failed manhood... by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know people who feed their family for the winter by using guns as tools. Get some perspective.

    --
    Good-bye
  12. Re:Yay by xaxa · · Score: 5, Informative

    Gun laws are an oxymoron. Criminals, by definition, do not abide by the laws. So it is only the good people that do not have guns in gun free zones. I do have strong feelings about gun laws but I do not think that this is the time to air them.

    I do. It's much more relevant now than any other time.

    Criminals don't abide by the laws, but with good enforcement and harsh sentencing for criminals using a gun the chance they'll carry one (and use it) decreases.

    Britain has harsh gun laws: it's pretty much an automatic minimum-five-year jail sentence if you handle a gun without a license. Shootings are rare, mass-shootings + suicide far rarer, and accidents (child getting gun, etc) very rare too. Knife crime is possibly more common that the US (I haven't checked), but I prefer it that way.

    Some criminals have guns, but they're careful with them. They're kept hidden somewhere (hidden in a relative's house, and carried to and from the scene by a young gang member in an attempt to avoid the penalty for possessing a gun).

    For example, 12 years for possessing a firearm, ammunition and knives with intent.

    Or 18 months for a 13-year-old holding a gun for an older gang member.

  13. Re:Yay by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  14. Nope 45killed in 1927 school, no guns used. by CrAlt · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bath_School_disaster
    guy blew up a school over taxes.. no guns

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing
    169 killed..no guns

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks
    3000 killed.. no guns..

    Yep.. some more laws will make us safe!!

    --
    I have to return some videotapes...
  15. Re:Somebody's got to say it by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nobody goes through their whole life being completely sane without interruption. Note that some of the most trusted people in our society, including astronauts and airline pilots, have exhibited harmful mental illness at times.

  16. Re:Somebody's got to say it by Jesse_vd · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well what the fuck do I know? I'm Canadian. I can't own or transport a registered handgun unless I belong to a shooting range. It's workin' out pretty good for us.

  17. Re:And yet... by geekoid · · Score: 4, Informative

    really, one case against the piles and piles of data in other countries that show, overall a clear reduction?

    You are nothing but a cherry picking bastard. not that I expect much more since no data support your position.
    2004:

    * 16,750 suicides (56% of all U.S. gun deaths)
    no, they wouldn't have found another way. Some may have, but probably about 25%. Most suicide deal wth the moment.

    * 11,624 homicides (40%)

    * 649 unintentional shootings, 311 from legal intervention and 235 from undetermined intent (4%).

    ~80 people a day die from guns

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  18. Re:It is time. by hondo77 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You do know that gun ownership and use is seriously regulated in Switzerland and that they don't have a standing army, right?

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  19. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article you quoted mentions that gun crimes in Chicago are down 9% overall. 438 deaths this year. Article mentions 900+ homicides in the early 90s. I think you may have accidentally posted an article that agrees with the person you were attempting to refute.

  20. Re:Yay by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 4, Informative

    Those are the number for accidental deaths of children. You know, children going into the gun cabinets of responsible gun owners and killing themselves or eachother? Or people who watched too many action films trying to save somebody's life?

    Accidental deaths for adults are ten times higher.

    And none of these 27 who died today are part of any of these numbers, they're in the "homocide" category.

    Combined homocides are 100 times higher. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ushomicidesbyweapon.svg

    Accidental injury rates are *much* *much* higher.

  21. Re:It is time. by gregstar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hey I am Swiss. In my country nearly every adult male needs to go 3 weeks every year serve the army until he is 30 years old. In nearly every building basement in my country you will find around 2-3 military assault rifle SIG SG 550. (depends how many man between the age of 18-32 live in the building) It's really difficult to buy a gun, but why would you do that? You can simply use the gun that the state gave you or to your father or brother of break into any building there is you will certainly find a rifle.

  22. Re:It is time. by suutar · · Score: 4, Informative

    indeed, Switzerland is probably the textbook example of a well-regulated militia.