Slashdot Mirror


First Photos and Video of Raspberry Pi Model A

coop0030 writes "The first photos and videos of the Model A production samples are now available. The Raspberry Pi Model A is the newest low-cost computer from the Raspberry Pi Foundation. Compared to the popular Model B, the Model A forgoes the Ethernet Controller, has 256MB of RAM, and has a single USB port. A benefit of the missing Ethernet controller is that power consumption is reduced. This allowed them to reach their goals of a low-cost $25 computer. The release date is for sometime early in 2013."

125 comments

  1. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'd rather see a $45 Pi with more Ram etc.

    1. Re:Why? by SomePgmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would too. But the goal was always for a $25 computer that's a useful, low cost learning tool. You can't fault them for actually making that happen.

    2. Re:Why? by fufufang · · Score: 2

      I'd rather see a $45 Pi with more Ram etc.

      You can buy a more expensive development board, if you want more ram.

    3. Re:Why? by White+Flame · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are a few others in the RPi space now. This board might be more up your alley: Cubieboard

    4. Re:Why? by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

      To you (and me) an extra $20 is peanuts. We might think differently if we were from the 3rd world.

    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you go: http://cubieboard.org/

    6. Re:Why? by expatriot · · Score: 1

      That page said the product was ready to ship in the last news update in September, but the order page still says preorder. Might be interesting if a US or European distributor picks it up. The only advantage of this over similarly priced Chinese "A10" tablets is the I/O pins.

    7. Re:Why? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Except its not shipping so kinda pointless to link to NOW, isn't it? Since we have seen so many of these things end up vaporware until they are actually filling orders i really wish people would stop linking to these things, a thousand and one things can make a deal fall through, trouble getting a chip, bad boards from the supplier driving the cost up to high, trouble getting support chips, so until we actually see people getting the units instead of some "pre-order" page its really as much vaporware as a Phantom console.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except its not shipping so kinda pointless to link to NOW, isn't it?

      Neither is the Raspberry Pi Model A, so what's your point?

    9. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From http://www.indiegogo.com/cubieboard?c=activity

      A quick update, we have started shipping now. All the fast shipping and one rich packages are shipped out today. We will send out the tracking number soon. The 2/5/10 rich packages will be shipped in 2 or 3 days.

    10. Re:Why? by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And to teachers who have to find money for thirty of them.

      --
      No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
    11. Re:Why? by dmesg0 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the point of getting Raspberry Pi with its ancient CPU. For ~50$ (including shipping from China) you can get mk808, which has:

      1GB RAM/8GB flash
      Dual core 1.2GHz Cortex A9 CPU (RK3066)
      MicroSD/USB/HDMI/Built-in Wi-Fi

    12. Re:Why? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      AIUI the problem is that while the SoC theoreticallly supports 1 gigabyte of ram noone actually makes an 8 gigabit* chip that is compatible with the memory interface on the SoC they are using.

      I suspect that at some point there will be a second gen Pi with a different SoC, a newer memory technology and more memory but I wouldn't expect it any time soon.

      *Don't ask me why system memory is typically measured in gigabytes while memory chips are measured in gigabits but that seems to be the way things are.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    13. Re:Why? by mjwalshe · · Score: 2

      The B now comes with 512

    14. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I reject the mk808 because I want a tiny portable computer, not a tiny portable angrybirds/netflix/facebook/pandora machine.

      If you are only comfortable with android, that's fine...a rasberry pi is not for you. Just don't act like these two devices are equal or similar.

    15. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you ordered your Pi online, you already have a computer. Just download Python and you can learn plenty there. Why do we need to buy another piece of hardware? I really don't get it.

    16. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, they aren't equal or similar. The mk808 is much better. Not only faster, but it runs the most popular Linux variant in the world.

    17. Re:Why? by White+Flame · · Score: 2

      It is shipping the first batch. Users have apparently shown unboxing videos and the like. The preorders are for the next batch.

    18. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait for the beaglebone to have a half price sale.

  2. ARMv6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's 2012, 2013 in about 400 hours. ARMv6 and just one USB2.0 port, which isn't even working right. You have got to be kidding.

    1. Re:ARMv6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. Will you sell us your better $25 computers?

    2. Re:ARMv6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I didn't think so.

      They're very nice considering they cost the same as an Arduino and lots of people appreciate an inexpensive option. So it appears we're all very fortunate that your opinion is totally irrelevant.

    3. Re:ARMv6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you're still comparing yourself to an Arduino, then you really need to get your head out of your ass and see what's available. Of course that's assuming you're not in the same demographic that finds using $30 boards to blink some LEDs empowering.

    4. Re:ARMv6 by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be fair, you can get Arduino clones for a lot less than that...

      You can even make one yourself. Solder a $3 chip to a piece of perfboard and write "Arduino" on it. It'll work just the same.

      The official $30 Arduino is for people who want their voltage regulators, USB interface, etc. all on a single board. Apparently that's a lot of people...

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:ARMv6 by samkass · · Score: 1

      If you're still comparing yourself to an Arduino, then you really need to get your head out of your ass and see what's available. Of course that's assuming you're not in the same demographic that finds using $30 boards to blink some LEDs empowering.

      For what it's worth, my 7 year old does indeed find programming flashing LEDs from a Python script incredibly empowering. And he's exactly the target audience for Raspberry Pi, too.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    6. Re:ARMv6 by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      What Slashdot reader ISNT in that demographic ? We're all nerds for crying out loud. Most of us HAVE DONE this.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  3. STFU already /.; everybody knows and nobody cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    STFU already about Raspberry Pi, at least until the A model is actually available; everybody knows and nobody cares!

  4. Availability. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wanted to get a model B, but the US availability sounds sketchy. May take up to a month? Hmmm...

    1. Re:Availability. by mirix · · Score: 1

      I ordered one from Newark last week, got it three? days later. It showed out of stock when I ordered.

      It's the newer model with 512MB RAM and screw holes (whoever fucked that up in the first place... it's mind boggling)... but it's not made in the UK. Not sure what that's about, I thought they were supposed to be now.

      I wanted to design a shield, but it appears there are no technical drawings of the thing. No drawing showing how far the mounting holes are from GPIO pin 1 and whatnot, just simple stuff like that. Guess I'll have to measure.

      I'm not sure why I hopped on this circus anyway... What amateur night project can't release something that simple?

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    2. Re:Availability. by rephlex · · Score: 2

      It's the newer model with 512MB RAM and screw holes (whoever fucked that up in the first place... it's mind boggling)... but it's not made in the UK. Not sure what that's about, I thought they were supposed to be now.

      Some of them are, some of them aren't. There have been multiple reports of the recently Chinese manufactured Pi's having questionable soldering and reliability problems. See here: http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=22473 and http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=24571

    3. Re:Availability. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you have a PDP-11 why do you want a raspberry-pi?

    4. Re:Availability. by mirix · · Score: 1

      I've been trying to reduce my power bill.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    5. Re:Availability. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I see that there are emulators around so maybe you could retain your software and retire the hardware (in the summer, anyway).

    6. Re:Availability. by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 2

      That emulator is proprietary, but this one http://simh.trailing-edge.com/ isn't, and emulates a couple of dozen different minicomputers. Seems like a good candidate for porting to the RasPi.

      --
      No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
  5. 256 is not enough by slacka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They should have waited until they could get the cost down with 512MB of RAM. Having used both the 256 and 512 Model B, I found that no amount of tweaking could make the 256 model run a web browser acceptably on a Linux desktop. Modern Linux desktops and browsers have gotten too bloated. LXDE is painfully slow, while KDE and gnome desktops are just downright unable. The 512 model has no such issue.

    1. Re:256 is not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Low-cost computer, not general-purpose desktop-replacement.

    2. Re:256 is not enough by nzac · · Score: 1

      Its not the desktop environment its just that browsers even with a few tabs open would like about 300Mb to function properly.
      Chose a lighter weight browser or get aggressive with cutting back your browsers memory usage.
      Both Debian and Arch's minimum requirements are 64Mb and you should be able to get it using less.

    3. Re:256 is not enough by houghi · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:256 is not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's got HDMI, so it's expected to run a GUI with applications, especially after the RaPi-Foundation showed off Linux desktops in their promotional videos. Even the stated purposes of teaching programmers requires that you can look up documentation, which means there has got to be a working web browser. There are also cheaper systems with much lower power consumption if you don't need a display, and much more powerful systems if you want a low cost Linux desktop.

      They've also said that you wouldn't expect to use the model A for the same purposes you use model B. Seriously; what better way to debug something than to plug it to a display? And how does HDMI force you to use a GUI? When has learning programming required a web browser?

    5. Re:256 is not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Instead of using Linux which is unfit for the RPi, you'd be better off running RISC OS, which has a full web browser that I assume runs super-fast.

    6. Re:256 is not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Low-cost computer, not general-purpose desktop-replacement.

      First statement on the FAQ:

      It’s a capable little PC which can be used for many of the things that your desktop PC does, like spreadsheets, word-processing and games. It also plays high-definition video.

    7. Re:256 is not enough by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      They should have waited until they could get the cost down with 512MB of RAM. Having used both the 256 and 512 Model B, I found that no amount of tweaking could make the 256 model run a web browser acceptably on a Linux desktop.

      Huh? My 256MB Pi runs a web browser perfectly...

      --
      No sig today...
    8. Re:256 is not enough by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      Quick access to BASIC too, which makes it ideal to get programming on.

    9. Re:256 is not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not really an emacs fanboy, but If you're looking to teach programming, I think XEmacs runs fine in 256MB, and is a self-documenting programming environment with no need for a web browser (though it does have one of those).

      I can't believe I'm recommending emacs as a low-footprint alternative; are you fucking happy now, Firefox you fat bitch?!

    10. Re:256 is not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, and the browser choices bundled with lightweight distros are hilarious, Xubuntu comes with firefox, which can't start up on a machine with 256MB of ram that's already running X and xfce, Lubuntu, on of the lightest ubuntu based distros, comes with chrome, fucking chrome!?! Because it's modular, you can start chrome, it's fairly snappy, but there isn't enough memory to host the rendering engine... Of course i should admit that these problems only come from attempting to use the systems without swap, say as a livecd, but who wants to be swapping on an SD card in a very slow ARM device?

    11. Re:256 is not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They should have waited until they could get the cost down with 512MB of RAM. Having used both the 256 and 512 Model B, I found that no amount of tweaking could make the 256 model run a web browser acceptably on a Linux desktop. Modern Linux desktops and browsers have gotten too bloated. LXDE is painfully slow, while KDE and gnome desktops are just downright unable. The 512 model has no such issue.

      I don't think the PI is really meant as a desktop replacement, but if you want to browse the web in 256 MB:

      No gnome, no KDE. A bare-bones window manager. It is not as if gnome/kde is needed for browsing the web anyway, I use neither and that is on a powerful pc.

      Also, use lightweight browser. lynx perhaps, or dillo if you have to have graphics. No plugins!

    12. Re:256 is not enough by couchslug · · Score: 1

      You don't need a desktop environment to use Linux for specialty applications because those can avoid using a DE entirely.

      Want a "desktop"? Buy the ITX combo of your choice and be happy.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    13. Re:256 is not enough by tommeke100 · · Score: 1

      Does it have an ARM version? looks like it's x86 only.

    14. Re:256 is not enough by mspohr · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you're trying to do but both Midori and Chrome run just fine on 256mb.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    15. Re:256 is not enough by mspohr · · Score: 1

      GUI runs great in 256.
      XBMC plays great video.
      Debian runs Chrome, Abiword and Gnumeric and they are fast.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    16. Re:256 is not enough by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      +eleventy, Retarded

      This post made my day, I can walk around with a smile now, thanks!

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    17. Re:256 is not enough by capedgirardeau · · Score: 1

      It still does not say desktop replacement. It says it can be used for some of the things you would do with a desktop, that is a big difference from saying it can replace your desktop.

      My 256meg Pi runs XBMC great, it surprised the heck out of me. But that was not what I bought it for and is not what I use it for so it was just an added bonus.

      I will be buying one of the new 512 Model B boards to be a media player for sure.

      I might get a model A board to use for an embedded application as I do not really need an RJ45 port and I find the only thing I use the USB for is a wifi dongle as I run my existing board headless anyway.

      --
      Wax on, wax off baby!
    18. Re:256 is not enough by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Dillo is excellent, I really like it. I wish there was more attention drawn to it, it could use some extra developers.

    19. Re:256 is not enough by lahvak · · Score: 2

      Exactly. It says nothing about "modern" bloated desktop environments. I have an old desktop computer that I use as a print server, and it crawls with lxde or xfce, but it is perfectly usable with something like fvwm or fluxbox, and runs gnumeric and abiword perfectly fine, as well as most games that are available in linux. I don't know if it plays HD video, I never tried it. It has 512 MB, but memory is almost never a problem, usually about half of that is free anyway.

      --
      AccountKiller
    20. Re:256 is not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "have gotten too bloated"

      Short memories forget how we all complained about Netscape and how we could not get a decent browsing experience on our Pentium MMX systems with 256 M of ram.

      It's THE SAME.

    21. Re:256 is not enough by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      IIRC it's x86 only and based on an aincient version of debian, i'm not sure i'd want to let such a thing near the internet.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    22. Re:256 is not enough by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      For sufficiently small definitions of "full web browser"

      Netsurf runs pretty fast under linux too, the trouble is website compatibility is pretty poor.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    23. Re:256 is not enough by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      When has learning programming required a web browser?

      Sadly, there are many who read Slashdot who think of themselves as 'web programmers.' Its just how things are these days.

      Real programmers don't always program in Assembly Language, but they can map their projects down to that level when necessary.

    24. Re:256 is not enough by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Real programmers don't always program directly in opcodes, but they can map their projects down to that level when necessary.

    25. Re:256 is not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no. It's capable of interpreting html just fine. The rasberry pi chokes on the same thing my modern desktop rig will. layer upon layer of javascript constantly polling and refreshing in the background even when you haven't looked at that page or tab in hours. You may think it's cool when facebook or twitter automagically lets you know that someone posted something 4 seconds ago but please realize that now the advertisements are doing that too. User 88833 left page whatever, cursor hovered over ad for 1.24 milliseconds, page refreshed with new topics, user has not responded. Every "modern" page does this.

      Turn javascript off, or install noscript and the like.

  6. Pointless change, more or less by rephlex · · Score: 2

    Judging from their forums, there's a significant number of people who think removing the Ethernet controller/USB hub chip is going to solve or at least substantially reduce the Raspberry Pi's problems with USB. It won't. Unfortunately, but predictably it doesn't look like the Foundation have done anything to correct this misconception. Isochronous transfers which audio interfaces, webcams etc. rely upon won't be affected much, if at all by this change, i.e. they will still be utterly broken. If you get one of these types of devices working at all with your Pi you should consider yourself lucky.

  7. one word by nihaopaul · · Score: 0

    Mk802iii much more powerful and cheaper than the raspberry pi

    1. Re:one word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the cheapest i can find a mk802iii is 62.37 and thats if i buy 20 or more...

  8. Re:Ummmmm... by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interesting. I saw a post just like yours when the Raspberry Pi was first announced. End result was demand was so high it was quite difficult to get. We'll see how it pans out this time.

  9. Natural Environment by dohzer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can we please get some photos of the Raspberry Pi in its natural environment; sitting unused, covered in dust on some hipster-geek's shelf?

    1. Re:Natural Environment by weazzle · · Score: 3, Funny

      As requested: http://imgur.com/nq4a2

    2. Re:Natural Environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the recycled housing is a nice touch

    3. Re:Natural Environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure you're on the right website?

    4. Re:Natural Environment by msim · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately that is the same story for mine too. It's less a lack of motivation & more of a lack of free time that has hamstrung my efforts.

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
  10. goal was always for a $25 computer by tuppe666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...except it wasn't.

    The goal was to stop the erosion in what is perceived to be "computer skills" and interest in computer science as computing in UK schools had become about "Office" and Consumer computing had become "electronics". In fact the cheap part is in response to computers being expensive and arcane. [from http://www.raspberrypi.org/about%5D

    I personally am convinced that the costs involved in raising the costs slightly to increase "memory" not anything else is incredibly wise. I have used GNU/Linux on little memory and its not fun...and Android seems to have similar requirements.

    1. Re:goal was always for a $25 computer by SomePgmr · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm not sure that disagrees with what I was saying. But no matter, I agree that a slightly nicer model would be nice. I'm just not upset that they released the one they said they would before working on a fancier one.

      I know a lot of people have been making noise about wanting a Model C since the beginning. I imagine they'll get around to it, and then people will gripe that it's either too expensive or not as good as their gaming rig. ;)

    2. Re:goal was always for a $25 computer by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually I'd like a model with Ethernet port and enough RAM but without graphics (that should save a lot of power, too).

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:goal was always for a $25 computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I'd like a model with Ethernet port and enough RAM but without graphics (that should save a lot of power, too).

      Apparently cutting the GPU won't save much power over the current boards.
      I've heard the GPU on the current models turns itself off if there is no output plugged in.

    4. Re:goal was always for a $25 computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's going to be pretty hard to cut the GPU out when the CPU is just an afterthought taped to it.

    5. Re:goal was always for a $25 computer by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      I have used GNU/Linux on a machine with 4MB of memory, and it worked just fine.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    6. Re:goal was always for a $25 computer by e70838 · · Score: 1

      I have learned linux in 92 on a 486dx33 with 16 Mo RAM and 120 Mo hard disk. It was really fun. At that time drawing a rectangular text window did not require and expensive 3D graphical card.

    7. Re:goal was always for a $25 computer by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Actually I'd like a model with Ethernet port ...

      According to the referenced Wikipedia article, the new model A (one USB, no Ethernet) has the System-on-a-Chip (SoC)'s USB port go directly to the connector, while in the older model B (two USBs, one Ethernet) it went to a 1:3 hub and the hub drove two USB connectors and an onboard, dongle-style, USB-to-Ethernet chip and connector.

      So plug in an external hub and an Ethernet dongle and you get the same functionality as the previous board. (You can also use a higher port-count and/or powered hub, more Ethernet dongles...)

      and enough RAM

      THAT's problematic.

      but without graphics (that should save a lot of power, too).

      So don't enable the graphics. B-)

      (I don't know if you can switch off the clock and/or power feed to the graphics selectively. On the other hand, you should be able to leave out the frame display stuff and graphic software, recover most of the RAM allocated to it, and still use the GPU for crunch.)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    8. Re:goal was always for a $25 computer by Erbo · · Score: 1

      You can change, in the boot configuration, the amount of RAM allocated to the CPU and GPU. The minimum configuration for the GPU is 32 Mb, leaving 224 Mb for the CPU, assuming a 256Mb board (either Model A or early Model B).

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    9. Re:goal was always for a $25 computer by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      It's a shame to waste 1/8 of your total memory on graphics storage for a headless application. Even if you want to keep graphics support available for debugging purposes, a 640x480x16 resolution is more than enough for that and needs only 150 kB.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  11. Beowulfcluster joke? by houghi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not so much a joke as a reality as is shown right here

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Beowulfcluster joke? by hey · · Score: 1

      Lego frame ... nice.

    2. Re:Beowulfcluster joke? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I just wish the idiots would stop calling it a supercomputer. I don't belive that such exaggeration does the community any favors.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  12. Re:Ummmmm... by virb67 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And why would anyone choose this model over B, with twice the ram, Ethernet, and a second USB port for a measly 10$ savings?

  13. Nice post

  14. Re:Ummmmm... by M1FCJ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lower power requirements. A lot of embedded device people don't care about the RAM and the ethernet. Who'd like to drag a network cable in their little robot?

  15. Re:Ummmmm... by Joce640k · · Score: 0

    And why would anyone choose this model over B, with twice the ram, Ethernet, and a second USB port for a measly 10$ savings?

    Not everybody is a spoiled first-world brat whose daddy pays for everything...?

    --
    No sig today...
  16. Jesus Pop politics by tuppe666 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Not everybody is a spoiled first-world brat whose daddy pays for everything...?

    Except this is a first world problem that this is designed to solve, Computers becoming to expensive to tinker with and the rise of consoles/dedicated electronics over General Purpose computers. The UK is still the first world.

    Quite frankly I'm a little tired of the lie that I can't complain because if I'm not dying of hunger, or my first priory is not getting clean water. The sad fact is I suspect that those never been your problem either.

    1. Re:Jesus Pop politics by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      The real first-world problem is lack of imagination. I can imagine scenarios where people would want one, why can't anybody else? (apparently...)

      eg. I might design/build an embedded gadget using my desktop Model B Pi but when I want to deploy it it won't need Ethernet, USB or ability to run 3 desktop apps simultaneously. Why should I pay $10 extra for things that will never be used? $10 her, $10 there, it adds up over time (or real fast if I want to deploy 100 of them...)

      And that's a first-world scenario...!

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Jesus Pop politics by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That's still cost basis.

      No mention of the fact that this unit is smaller, lighter, and uses less power too.

    3. Re:Jesus Pop politics by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2

      How does the developed world lack imagination? It's producing these devices, and generating the demand for them, and using them in the applications. Indeed most innovation comes from outside the third world. Yes, third worlders are busier just surviving, but the developed world is supplying plenty of imagination.

      Your post was sent from the developed world, and shows plenty of imagination.

      Now, I won't disagree that plenty of developed worlders are idiots without imagination. But they've outsourced it to people like us, which is how we address the problem. The species lacks sufficient imagination, but that's not really what we're talking about here. There's plenty of imagination to go around, though it would be better if there were more.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Jesus Pop politics by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      How does the developed world lack imagination?

      Not the 'world', the people who always come on Slashdot posting about how if they don't want something it has no right to exist.

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:Jesus Pop politics by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I'm just positing an example. I'm sure there's plenty more.

      I don't think it's smaller though, it's the same PCB...

      --
      No sig today...
  17. +1 by csumpi · · Score: 0

    How about promoting hardware that actually works, has a case, multiple times the memory and in the end costs less than the RPi? The RPi will just sit in the junk pile unused after the initial buzz wears off and reality sets it.

  18. Re:Ummmmm... by dabadab · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And why would anyone choose this model over B, with twice the ram, Ethernet, and a second USB port for a measly 10$ savings?

    Because they:
    1. Don't care much about that difference
    and
    2. Buy lots of them in which case it's a saving of not 10$ but 30% - and that's a lot.

    --
    Real life is overrated.
  19. Re:STFU already /.; everybody knows and nobody car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love that this got modded -1 Redundant, despite being the first post to criticize timothy's r-pi hardon.

    It's like "YMBNH" on steroids; ANY criticism of the editors is redundant, because their suckitude is self-evident.

  20. Re:I don't know about anyone else by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I bought one and I'm sick and fucking tired of hearing about it. I don't want to hear one more fucking thing until ICS or later is running on it, personally, since that was the news that got me to buy one, and then they never released it, and Liz never adequately explained why.

    Raspberry Pi serves as a reminder to the community as to why we still need electronics companies. Apparently, we are not yet capable of producing and delivering a product this complex without doing it badly, even with all the support you could ever hope for from the vendor.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  21. Re:STFU already /.; everybody knows and nobody car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chill a bit. You could've just expressed your opinion by saying that you're gonna wait for the batch to be secured before we can say much about it, and pass on to read some other article. R-Pi is actually a hot topic in electronics and not just some /. editor's hardon.

  22. To those demanding 512MB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To those demanding 512MB, you're a treadmill consumer, not a real programmer.

    raspberry pi is supposed to be like the C64/spectrum 8 bit era computers.
    the reason these 8bit machines lasted 15+ years, is because programmers eventually learned to break the rules and extend the functionality of the systems far beyond the hardware designers ever conceived. I disagreed with the foundation extending the B model to 512MB as it sets it apart on an upgrade treadmill course, rather than a, develop badass low level code hacker attitude that prevailed on the 8bit demo scene and game industry.

    look at late C64 titles like creatures 2, mayhem in monsterland (MIM was 68k long, the programmer found 4K of storage in the C64 ROM chips!)
    (the legendary 'lick your finger' cheat code for creatures 2) Triads Red Storm demo, Nuvie FMV player and many other examples of good programmers striping the code back to the silicon, and creating something unexpected, inspirational and mind blowing.

    The people here asking for 512MB are the the rich kids whose parents bought them NESes/SNESesand Genesises when they got bored waiting for tapes to load and only returned to computing in the pentium era. While those happy with 256MB are the kids who bought disk drives, compression utility carts and tore it up on C64s/Speccys/Amigas during these years.

    1. Re:To those demanding 512MB by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Of course, it's the latter group, and people like them, who developed the titles the former group bought into. Without the former, the latter wouldn't have jobs.

      I've learned, at this point in my life, that the fact that not everyone shares my point of view is a good thing; if everyone saw things my way, they'd all write their own code, instead of paying me to do so.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  23. Re:Ummmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the ethernet and extra usb port all hang off the same bus, the only real benefit to the model B is the 512mb ram. for xbmc use I'd much rather have a model A so I can plug in a usb wifi adapter and roll with it.

  24. Re:I don't know about anyone else by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    plenty of people working on that port, you're just whining because open source volunteers aren't working to YOUR schedule? hint for you, don't buy hardware for software that isn't released yet.

  25. Re:I don't know about anyone else by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    plenty of people working on that port, you're just whining because open source volunteers aren't working to YOUR schedule?

    No, I'm complaining. Whining is a matter of tone.

    hint for you, don't buy hardware for software that isn't released yet.

    Yes. That's what I said.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  26. Re:STFU already /.; everybody knows and nobody car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STFU already about Raspberry Pi, at least until the A model is actually available; everybody knows and nobody cares!

    Tell me where you work. I'll put a Pi in a little white case, label it "Carbon Monoxide Detctor -- Do Not Remove", equip it with a wifi dongle, load up the PwnPi distro and leave it in your furnace room. Glad to hear you'll be okay with that since it's just a POS.

  27. Re:Ummmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought there were problems with the USB and ethernet on the model B, but I may be mistaken or they may be fixed.

    The model B only has one USB out, but they stuck a USB hub chip and USB ethernet chip (they may both be in a single chip) on there to get the two ports and ethernet. If I'll be hooking up my own hub anyway, why not stick my own USB ethernet on there? And with the lower power consumption of the A (because it has no on-board USB hub or ethernet), it will be easier to power it from a spare port on a powered USB hub. I admit the extra RAM on the B is a plus, but not everyone will need it.

  28. Re:I don't know about anyone else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like whining to me!

  29. Re:I don't know about anyone else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you wanted Android then why didn't you get one of those cheap Android devices? I know they cost a bit more than the RPi, but they have a better processor and ICS actually already runs on them.

    Here's a tip, never buy hardware for software that is promised to run in the future, only for what it runs today.

  30. Re:Ummmmm... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone choose to use an ATTiny microcontroller over an ATMega with 4 times the ram, 8 times the I/O capability, multi port analogue to digital conversions, interfaces for UART, SPI, TWI etc, for a measly $1.50 savings?

    There's much more to a device than cost. So far every application of a Raspberry Pi (despite what the makers showed with their lovely full Linux desktop displays) has NOT been a general purpose computer. Typically I've seen these used as a small embedded platform. In many cases the size of the PCB, weight (e.g. send these up in weather balloons), and power requirements (e.g. run it from solar and a small battery for a remote data monitoring station) may be the overriding factor.

    The Raspberry Pi makers look to be trying to take away the market share from small ARM development boards.

  31. PI, Ponzi Scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Raspberry Pi is a joke. Try and find one in the US. Sounds like a Ponzi scheme to me.

    When Digikey [http://www.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?WT.z_header=search_go&lang=en&keywords=Raspberry%20Pi&x=0&y=0&cur=USD] has them I will believe.

    Newark, lets see [http://www.newark.com/jsp/bespoke/bespoke7.jsp?bespokepage=newark/en_US/landing/raspberry-pi/rasp-pi-accessories.jsp&CMP=KNC-G-SUPP-RASPBERRYPI&mckv=sFYz5rH4A|pcrid|18280677381|plid|], not in stock. Wait, they are never in stock.

    Really?

     

    1. Re:PI, Ponzi Scheme by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      I ordered one about 3 weeks ago from Newark and it arrived in a week. Their site said it was out of stock but I did get one. I suspect they have a revolving outage. Even if they didn't, its only $35. If that breaks the bank then you shouldn't be playing.

  32. $15 Pi by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    More interesting is a $15 Pi with lower HW specs : no audio; no serial (only 1 USB, like Model A); no HDMI (only VGA) or even no video. But also integrated wireless mesh, preferably a snapin daughtercard for either Bluetooth, Zigbee, or even WiFi.

    The purpose of these devices is to bootstrap British youth Computer Science education. That education better focus on networked distributed computing, preferably wireless for mobile or just ubiquity. Only one of the machines on the network needs better specs, for human interface. The rest should interface to the many things we have to make smart.

    I personally would buy thousands of those low spec devices each year. I'm sure there's a market for hundreds of millions, probably many billion of them. Though most of that market will probably be served by stickon, postage-stamp sized devices powered by ambient (heat, light, flexing) energy and cost under $1, we have to get there steadily. I don't know why Chinese exporters aren't selling Model A and Model B for under $20 already (they're $80+), and a $10- Model C stripped down from there.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  33. Re:Ummmmm... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    You're right. Please send me your $36.50 ATMega version.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  34. Re:I don't know about anyone else by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    I see raspberry pies running Debian linux just fine. buy one, plenty of useful software for it, don't need any android to get something useful done

  35. Nah, that's not them. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    The people here asking for 512MB are the the rich kids whose parents bought them ...

    Nah.

    They're the people who want to plug in an off-the-shelf distro and get the project done in a couple weeks.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  36. Re:Ummmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And why would anyone choose this model over B, with twice the ram, Ethernet, and a second USB port for a measly 10$ savings?

    People with a different definition of measly?

  37. Re:Ummmmm... by tapspace · · Score: 1

    EVERYBODY wants more RAM. It's universal among software programmers. As an embedded person myself, let me just say: Give me RAM or give me death.

  38. Re:Ummmmm... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Why do i get the feeling you've missed the point...

  39. Re:Ummmmm... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Because you're not paying attention.

    --

    --
    make install -not war