Slashdot Mirror


Astronauts Could Get Lazier As Mars Mission Progresses

sciencehabit writes "Imagine life on a spaceship headed to Mars. You and your five crewmates work, exercise, and eat together every day under the glow of fluorescent lights. As the months pass, the sun gets dimmer and communication with Earth gets slower. What does this do to your body? According to an Earth-based experiment in which six volunteers stayed in a windowless 'spaceship' for nearly a year and a half, the monotony, tight living space, and lack of natural light will probably make you sleep more and work less. Space, for all intents and purposes, turns you into a couch potato."

145 comments

  1. Star Trek by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Explains why Riker stopped shaving second season.

    1. Re:Star Trek by ackthpt · · Score: 0

      Explains why Riker stopped shaving second season.

      Make it so, Number One.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Star Trek by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

      Man.

      These astronauts work 3 days, every five years - taking a round-trip to... NOWHERE!

      And you say it's possible for them to get lazier? Wow. :-)

      Make it number two, number one!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:Star Trek by ko7 · · Score: 1

      I figured that he did that for Deanna.

    4. Re:Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He abandoned the dating scene. BTW like the Spartans, they bring alog wife and children and loose a few of them every time shields get to low.

      This should be tried in submarines. The term "Hot-bedding" would have a new meaning.

  2. already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've already done this experiment over 30 times. Its called winter.

    1. Re:already done by aliquis · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I too could had told them what. Being unemployed since long in Sweden.

      Most basement dwellers and/or gamers to.

      Imagine going to Mars just playing RTS games in the mean time =P

    2. Re:already done by aliquis · · Score: 2

      - But wouldn't you miss the sex? (Say there's no females on the trip for safety reasons.)
      - What sex?

    3. Re:already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've already done this experiment over 30 times. Its called winter.

      lolz so so true

    4. Re:already done by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      I've already done this experiment over 30 times. Its called winter.

      Move to California. We're nuts out here. We run, bike, hike, walk dogs, everything in the pouring rain. We're so used to being out and about we can't control outselves.

      "Jane!!! Stop this crazy thing! Jane!!!"

      So the solutiion is to hang a bunch of wall paper in the space craft of golden hills, vinyards, redwood groves, beaches, granite infested mountain trails and a Jeep.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:already done by PPH · · Score: 2

      I thought you folks in Sweden already had a solution for long, cold winter nights.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:already done by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Females are unsafe?

    7. Re:already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've already done this experiment over 30 times. Its called winter.

      Can't we just move the grow-lights over to the couch so I can get a fake tan while I wait for the next episode of the Walking Dead to be beamed to the ship?

    8. Re:already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Really? Most Californians I know freak out if it rains. Really rains, not what passes for rain in most of California.

    9. Re:already done by Lisias · · Score: 1

      Females are unsafe?

      Let me guess : you are virgin? =P

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    10. Re:already done by gandhi_2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      A south puget sounder would stab you in the face with a fair-trade knife for claiming a californian knows rain.

    11. Re:already done by Maow · · Score: 2

      A south puget sounder would stab you in the face with a fair-trade knife for claiming a californian knows rain.

      Vancouverite here.

      I'd loan you my organic, fair-trade knife, but it's rusted completely away.

      F'ing rain.

    12. Re:already done by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Irrationality, stemming from bipolar hormonal ebbs and surges aren't safe in a vacuum.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    13. Re:already done by pep939 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's good point. On the topic of videogames, I wonder if a very engaging virtual reality would be able to counter this.

    14. Re:already done by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I think they have argued it could lead to conflict or whatever. Rape? I don't know. For whatever reason they seem to want all guys.

      Whatever the lack of females lead to anything I don't know.

    15. Re:already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - But wouldn't you miss the sex? (Say there's no females on the trip for safety reasons.) - What sex?

      Imagine a NASA engineered version of the RealDoll (NSFW!). Such a device could solve the world's population boom problem, too.

    16. Re:already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...After a while it's like living in a snow globe." -- Peter Griffin

    17. Re:already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In women these symptoms are a result of lack of decent orgasms. Maybe its a common theme with the women youve been involved with.

    18. Re:already done by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      A south puget sounder would stab you in the face with a fair-trade knife for claiming a californian knows rain.

      As an Okie who lives in the Puget Sound, I'd shoot a south puget sounder with my God given 2nd amendment guns for claiming he knows rain, but I'm back home for the holidays and currently hiding in the cellar because of a tornado.

      .

    19. Re:already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spent about 2 years living in Seattle... coming from WI was not impressed by the rain... I would consider those two summers/winters to be light to moderate rain at worst that I've seen... everyone called it a downpour, i said meh... WI routinely has harder rain in the summer.

      it rained more frequently in Seattle, but it was lighter and short each time...

      the snow was funny to watch though... people with snow chains on a flat highway...

    20. Re:already done by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Rape? So they don't want females because the males can't be controlled?

    21. Re:already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were a native, you'd know that Puget Sound does not take a definite article. Neither do freeways.

    22. Re:already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have 18 month long winters where you live?

    23. Re:already done by aliquis · · Score: 1

      But how can you play boardgames with a realdoll?

      Totally inferior. I want the real deal. But their longetivity for sex seem limited. I don't know how to solve that.

      Real deal controlling a realdoll? :D

    24. Re:already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or gay. Or might be a woman. Or might just like using their hand. Or might just be asexual and finds glands annoying.

  3. Space Potato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It turns you into a Spudnik.

    1. Re:Space Potato by mjwx · · Score: 3, Funny

      It turns you into a Spudnik.

      Astronauts are being replaced by doughnauts.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:Space Potato by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Or a Cosmo-not

  4. Then americans.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    are the best fit to colonize space for sure!

    1. Re:Then americans.. by Sussurros · · Score: 1

      Look at photos of modern American soldiers and compare them to, say, photos of WW2 American soldiers. I choose soldiers because they are a trained group of people employed by the Federal Government. It could of course be any contiguous group of American people.

      Next work out how much it costs to get one kg of mass into orbit.

      All that prime American beef is going to stay right here on Earth and it'll be jockeys that colonise the solar system and turn into space puddings in the process.

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    2. Re:Then americans.. by I+Mean,+What · · Score: 0

      Hey, come on, it's funny because it's true.

    3. Re:Then americans.. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Hey! We invented Al Gore.

    4. Re:Then americans.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you launch a typical African or Asian astronaut, to minimize costs. When he returns, he will fit in perfectly in the American society.

  5. Please listen to space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is telling you : "I am empty and deadly. Please enjoy your planet responsibly."

    1. Re:Please listen to space by vlm · · Score: 1

      It is telling you : "I am empty and deadly. Please enjoy your planet responsibly."

      Didn't stop us from moving to Australia either.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  6. Experiment probably worse than the real thing by erice · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A year and half in simulated mars mission where you know it is a simulation has to be worse. In a real Mars mission, the crew will be know their activities are important: for the excitement to be first on mars, for the knowledge that a serious screw up could them their lives. On a simulated mission, you're just guinea pigs. Staying motivated must very difficult.

    1. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by blackraven14250 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, that's the psychology aspect, but the biological angle might not be as kind.

    2. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by plover · · Score: 1

      On a real mission, the trip out is likely to be pretty much demotivational as well. "Here I am, stack of college degrees and qualifications longer than your arm, and what am I doing? Watering hydroponic plants. Oh, god, I'm so depressed."

      --
      John
    3. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      +This. The crew on the REAL trip would be a lot more motivated than this "simulation" bunch.

      Plus the real crew would consist of men with balls of steel, ones who truly have the right stuff. Can you imagine Neil Armstrong or John Glenn lounging like a couch potato?

    4. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      On a real mission, the trip out is likely to be pretty much demotivational as well. "Here I am, stack of college degrees and qualifications longer than your arm, and what am I doing? Watering hydroponic plants. Oh, god, I'm so depressed."

      Be happy Marvin is not on the mission.

    5. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a real mission, the trip out is likely to be pretty much demotivational as well. "Here I am, stack of college degrees and qualifications longer than your arm, and what am I doing? Watering hydroponic plants. Oh, god, I'm so depressed."

      We'll have to be sure to brighten up the living quarters with plenty of demotivational posters, then.

    6. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by x1n933k · · Score: 1

      On a simulated mission, you're just guinea pigs. Staying motivated must very difficult.

      I certainly agree to some extent. If you check out the links this goes beyond simple will-power and excitement. It is more biological. This isn't the first time this has been talked about either and even Sci-fi writers though about this issue for long trips in our era (Earth room in Danny Boyles 'Sunshine' comes to mind).

      Mood lighting in over-seas flights help with sleeping on modern aircraft too, regardless of the excitement of passengers arriving in a time-zone much different from the one they left in. This is just a silly example that seems to fit with their findings. Yes, long-haul flights are 7 to 20 hours long but it is the closest most of us come to that kind of scenario.

    7. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A year and half in simulated mars mission where you know it is a simulation has to be worse.

      Since you seem to have have no actual experience in significant simulators, you couldn't possibly understand how wrong you are. You're on the line in the simulator too, and you damn well know it. You honestly think the guys in the simulator aren't motivated to do the best job possible?
       

      In a real Mars mission, the crew will be know their activities are important: for the excitement to be first on mars, for the knowledge that a serious screw up could them their lives.

      You can't sustain that kind of excitement/attention for months at a time, it's mentally extremely exhausting. And, having been there done that, the knowledge that a serious screwup could cost you your life eventually fades into the background noise. Back when I was making SSBN patrols, we saw the same things they saw in the study... guys tended to sleep more, lag more, and get lazier and sloppier as the patrol wore on. It took real effort to counteract it. Unlike these guys, we had experience and a culture (pride in your crew and boat and in wearing the fish) that made counteracting it something of a priority - but it was still hard to be as on top of things on day sixty five of a patrol as you were on day one.

    8. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Go read up sometime on current astronaut selection criteria.

      There's a lot less "balls of steel," than there is "plays well with others," and "pays great attention to detail even when tired, bored, or otherwise distracted."

    9. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could mitigate the biological angle pretty easily (albeit at the cost of research/production/development time/money) but the psychological angle is pretty constant until we make some major breakthroughs in space flight. You're in a spacecraft for X amount of time and Y amount of that is spent on fitness. You can increase/decrease Y with more/better fitness devices, but you can't really decrease X without inventing warp speed or faster than light travel or teleportation.

    10. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by celtic_hackr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Stupid studies. Why not look at history? A trip to Mars is about five months (150 days) with current technology, although, most of our trips these days are in the nine month category (260 days, less fuel). The American Colonists spent up to 3 months sailing across the Atlantic. A trip from England to it's colony China, back in the day was a very dangerous and lengthy journey, well over nine months in length. A circumnavigation of the planet took three years to do. US subs, regularly stay submerged for 9 months at a time. No sunlight. When's the last time you've heard of a nuclear sub being lost because the crew got lazy? Right. Never.

      Idiots and their surveys. Whatever editor allowed this post needs to have his/her Geek and Nerd credentials yanked.

    11. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but you're a delivery boy in space.

    12. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by Immerman · · Score: 2

      And we know the solution to the biological problem - high-intensity natural spectrum artificial light to compensate for the loss of natural light. Or you know, if you want to be energy-efficient just don't cut off all the natural light. Any ship would after all be in full sunlight the entire time, a sunning lounge with mostly UV-blocking windows (don't want to eliminate it entirely, that stuff is important to human biology) would likely solve most of the problems. Mars is only 50% further away, so even at the end of your journey you'd be getting ~44% of full intensity sunlight, which is a heck of a lot more than your lamps are likely putting out.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    13. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      US subs, regularly stay submerged for 9 months at a time. No sunlight. When's the last time you've heard of a nuclear sub being lost because the crew got lazy?

        USS San Francisco - 08 Jan 2005. OK, so they didn't lose the ship but they came awfully damn close. Why? In part, I believe, because they'd been gone a long time and were headed for a liberty port. And in the years I spent at sea, it was always the end of patrol when I got nervous... because things could tend to get sloppy and guys tended to get lazy towards the end of a run. And that went times ten when we went non-alert and started making turns for King's Bay and turnover.
       

      Stupid studies. Why not look at history?

      We aren't the same people we were a century or more ago - society has changed, people's expectations have changed, etc... etc...
       

      Idiots and their surveys. Whatever editor allowed this post needs to have his/her Geek and Nerd credentials yanked.

      The idiot here isn't the editor - it's looking back in your mirror.

    14. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing that would give you, like, 10 different cancers.

    15. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So true. Men just love a challenge!

    16. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Also for a real crew the excitement will wear off soon, after which boredom starts taking over. On the trip there is probably nothing to do on the ship, as the ship will fly itself (computer controlled with navigational commands sent from Earth). And when people have nothing to do they will stop paying attention, get lazy, sleep more, etc. The lack of sunlight is probably just a minor issue as that can be solved by having brighter artificial lighting.

    17. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by donaldm · · Score: 1

      The problems encountered with spacefiight to even a close planet such as Mars are considerable. The first is solar radiation which is considerable and can lead to cell destruction with out the proper protection (sun screen won't cut it). The second is the length of time it takes to get to Mars from our planet. Thirdly you have to contend with weightlessness or micro gravity for the trip and then when you get to Mars you you only have one sixth gravity which is definitely not good for the human physiology over a long term. Fourthly you have to bring along your own oxygen since there is little if any on the planet.

      Actually none of the issues are insurmountable however given current spaceflight technology it is going to be very hazardous for anyone traveling to Mars. Faster propulsion systems and radiation shields would cut down the risk considerably.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    18. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the spaceship could funnel in real light.

      but these earthbound "missions" are done pretty much as "psychology experiment" experiments. call it pseudo science if you will, but they're done largely to just kill time.

      we got better data already... from actual space stations and actual research doing stations on isolated spots on earth. not to mention that people have been going on very risky very long voyages before.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    19. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by cffrost · · Score: 1

      On a real mission, the trip out is likely to be pretty much demotivational as well. "Here I am, stack of college degrees and qualifications longer than your arm, and what am I doing? Watering hydroponic plants. Oh, god, I'm so depressed."

      Well, instead of sending a few smart, expensive people, we see how many TSA "agents" can be stuffed into the spaceship? Maybe some of them will even figure out how to survive. ;o)

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    20. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by SigmundFloyd · · Score: 1

      A year and half in simulated mars mission where you know it is a simulation has to be worse. In a real Mars mission, the crew will be know their activities are important: for the excitement to be first on mars, for the knowledge that a serious screw up could them their lives. On a simulated mission, you're just guinea pigs. Staying motivated must very difficult.

      Yeah, let's not give those NASA slobs the benefit of doubt. Clueless as they are, they surely haven't found a way to motivate the simulation crew. They could have told the crew "the results of this simulation will make or break the Mars mission", for example, but - as a Slashdot commenter - I'm sure they haven't thought this stuff out very well.

      --
      Knowledge is power; knowledge shared is power lost.
    21. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by g4b · · Score: 1

      You need natural light for vitamine D, but thats basicly it. So, no, its not just "light missing".

    22. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Are you familiar with the...somewhat gruesome... assortment of disciplinary tools used to keep sailors on task during ye olden days of wooden ships and iron men(tm)?

    23. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you missed the "a sunning lounge with mostly UV-blocking windows" part.

    24. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Minor correction - Mars surface gravity is ~1/3 of Earth's, it's the Moon that's ~1/6.

      Actually we have no clue what the effects of prolonged exposure to reduced gravity is - we've never tried it. It would probably still reduce muscle mass since you could get by exerting smaller forces, but that's not actually a significant health problem directly. We do know prolonged exposure to *microgravity* does bad things to your skeleton (well, we *think* it's the uG, could be the radiation exposure), but that's a rather special case in that "weightlessness" almost completely removes a lot of the stresses your skeleton is normally exposed to. In reduced gravity, unlike uG, you'd still be walking, sending regular shockwaves through your skeleton with each step, and exerting certain minimum forces to move larger objects. They'd mostly be smaller than on Earth, but right now we only have two data points of biological effects: 1G and ~0G, we have no idea what the curve between them looks like, it could well be that we're just fine over a wide range with a steep drop near 0.

      Yes, the trip itself will be risky, any time we leave the oasis we evolved in that will be the case. But aside from the solar wind which gets shielded by the magnetosphere (and probably wouldn't be too much of an issue) the people on the space station are already being exposed to pretty much everything that will be faced on a trip to Mars, many of them for periods longer than even a leisurely one-way trip. The only real increased risk is that on a Mars trip you can't get more supplies or bug out to Earth in an emergency.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    25. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by khallow · · Score: 1

      We aren't the same people we were a century or more ago - society has changed, people's expectations have changed, etc... etc...

      In other words, we are the same people we were. Changing society or expectations doesn't change that.

    26. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The amount of doublethink it would take to reach that conclusion from what I said, not to mention external evidence plain to anyone with an IQ over room temperature is absolutely astounding.

      Is it a natural talent, or did you practice?

    27. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by khallow · · Score: 1

      The amount of doublethink it would take to reach that conclusion from what I said

      I was merely pointing out that you were using irrelevant measures. Did we change biologically in the last century? No. Did we change mentally in the last century? No. We are the same people we were.

      And let's note why that's important. The earlier poster asked "Why not look at history?" Modest changes in society just don't qualify as a serious reason for why we can't use the lessons of history.

    28. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      I disagree, while I was being rather grandiose on the submarine bit, my point was we routinely do long mission type activities. Rather than do an artificial study, there is a wealth of real world data to draw from and analyze. But apparently that leap of logic was too much for your amazing brain, and you took too literal an interpretation.

      Secondly, we are still the same people. Doing a considerable amount of historical searching, one thing is clear we have not changed much in 500 years. We've gotten more advanced, and mostly better educated, most do less physically demanding work, are relatively better off financially, etc. But for the most part we've not changed much physiologically, and arestill capable of doing the things we did 100, 200, 500 or even a 1000 years ago.

      Thirdly, I never said the editor was an idiot, merely that he/she didn't bother to look deep enough before posting this unworthy of /. study news.

      Lastly, I'm impressed at your extreme powers of intelligence detention being able to determine an idiot from a single paragraph of a written opinion, while simultaneously ignoring higher intellect functions.

    29. Re:Experiment probably worse than the real thing by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I disagree, while I was being rather grandiose on the submarine bit, my point was we routinely do long mission type activities.

      You're quite welcome to disagree. What you're not welcome to do is make shit up out of thin air like you are - because we don't "routinely" conduct long duration activities of this sort. Even the longest and most isolated (something like an Antarctic winter over) are shorter and much more in contact than a Mars bound craft.
       

      Rather than do an artificial study, there is a wealth of real world data to draw from and analyze. But apparently that leap of logic was too much for your amazing brain, and you took too literal an interpretation.

      I gave you real world data, but you choose to ignore it because it doesn't fit the preconceived notions you've pulled out of your ass.
       

      Doing a considerable amount of historical searching, one thing is clear we have not changed much in 500 years.

      Right. So, we still tolerate slavery. And routine abuse of women (as well as treating them as property). And the divine rights of the nobility are widely taken as grants from God... Oh, wait. None of those things are true - but somehow societal expectations haven't changed and we're the same people we always were.
       

      Lastly, I'm impressed at your extreme powers of intelligence detention being able to determine an idiot from a single paragraph of a written opinion

      You should be. And the additional evidence you've provided have merely served to confirm the diagnosis - you're an ignorant fuckwit.

  7. Heart of Gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is why the Heart Of Gold is shaped like a running shoe - does all the running FOR you. Outsource everything...

    1. Re:Heart of Gold by istartedi · · Score: 1

      OK, so moderators not only fail to distinguish between Troll and "I disagree with your PoV", they are also out of touch with Geek culture

      I'd give 42 mod points if I had them.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    2. Re:Heart of Gold by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      I'm a lazy editor. I have
        _ _
      / \/ \
      \_/\./

      infinite mod points. But remember, I'm lazy...

      --- Posted without karma bonus because it's *supposed* to be lame.

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
  8. That is what full spectrum lights are for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Full spectrum lights are already used for treating depression.

    The lack of windows will not be valid - they will be used for observation of external activity (minor repairs, antenna alignments, ...

    The big problem with long flights is eyesight - lack of long distance focus causes the eyeball to change shape gradually (known on submarines). Result is near sightedness.

    1. Re:That is what full spectrum lights are for. by PPH · · Score: 1

      The big problem with long flights is eyesight - lack of long distance focus causes the eyeball to change shape gradually

      Fix that with special glasses.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:That is what full spectrum lights are for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or changing images of naked people out on external booms.

    3. Re:That is what full spectrum lights are for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Too much trouble to have to keep cleaning off the portholes.

    4. Re:That is what full spectrum lights are for. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      That's not so bad, Mars is a smaller planet, everything will be closer anyway!

    5. Re:That is what full spectrum lights are for. by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Exactly. What sort of half-assed research project is this? Didn't they even bother to skim existing literature for known problems with things they're depriving their subjects of?

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  9. Beaten by Fake Results by Jetra · · Score: 2

    I call mulligan and demand they do a real field test over a simulation.

  10. This is how you prevent laziness: by RoverDaddy · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
    1. Re:This is how you prevent laziness: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many folks would pay for real (educational) videos of sex in micro-gravity? NASA gets funding, we get space porn, no one's bored.

  11. Curiosity by drankr · · Score: 1

    Are these the astronauts with Alzheimer's? From the other day?

    1. Re:Curiosity by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 2

      Yes, the trip will damage their brains. It will also cause loss of teeth, and impair eyesight. Maybe these are caused by eating all those silkworms? Of course this is all moot since the astronauts will be killed by the cosmic rays. Don't know why the researchers can't connect these dots. They must have impaired eyesight or something.

  12. Nothing to do in the middle of trip? by billyswong · · Score: 1

    Give them meaningful works that could only be done on space. Else boredom kills.

    1. Re:Nothing to do in the middle of trip? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Give them meaningful works that could only be done on space.

      For example, give them a big challenge, like trying to shut down a wayward computer that talks like a sedate Mitt Romney that locks them outside without space helmets.

  13. TLDR by Tanman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Too Lazy Didn't Read

  14. Couch Potato.. check. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Americans are clearly the most experienced, well-trained, and qualified.

    Couch Potato.. check.

  15. Film at eleven by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    So, being confined to a small place with no need for physical fitness results in less physical activity? That's quite shocking.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  16. More lights by lightknight · · Score: 1

    Just install more lights.

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  17. My body is ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been training for this mission my entire life.

  18. For a moment I wondered if you were joking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sadly enough, I think you're being serious.

    This experiment was precisely to test if trained astronauts, in peak physical and mental health, could maintain that over a long period of isolation and lack of earth-like conditions. Unsurprisingly, the answer was "No" for reasons that anyone (at least, anyone living up here in the north, where sun doesn't stay up for more than a couple of hours a day for several months each winter) could have predicted:

    Actigraphy revealed that crew sedentariness increased across the mission as evident in decreased waking movement (i.e., hypokinesis) and increased sleep and rest times. Light exposure decreased during the mission. The majority of crewmembers also experienced one or more disturbances of sleep quality, vigilance deficits, or altered sleep–wake periodicity and timing, suggesting inadequate circadian entrainment

    To suggest that "The fact that such environment seriously fscks up your physical and mental health is just because they were sloths to begin with. REAL men wouldn't go through such." is just absurd.

    1. Re:For a moment I wondered if you were joking... by TheLink · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Meh, they should just hire nuclear submariners instead of pilots. They manage OK.

      Nowadays much of what NASA does seems to be a big waste of time and money.

      --
    2. Re:For a moment I wondered if you were joking... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I suspect that there will be a certain reluctance to talk about it too loudly; but any serious human space activity will probably some amount of surgical or genetic modification(or a whole lot of drugs).

      It isn't ready to go now; but it wouldn't be particularly hard to imagine our research in using stem cells and biocompatible scaffolds to produce replacement organs being applicable to the production of artificial endocrine glands, possibly even with cute features like optical control interfaces, that could be implanted into astronauts.

      Further tweaks(like messing with myostatin to cope with muscle wasting in low gravity, or futzing with bone growth regulation to keep your astronauts from landing with skeletons more brittle than your great-grandmother's would probably also be in order).

      For very short missions, mere screening for people who aren't claustrophobic and who have the 'right stuff' may be adequate; but it's far from clear that even exceptional human specimens are prepared to endure the conditions of prolonged space travel...

    3. Re:For a moment I wondered if you were joking... by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      Nuclear submariners stay submerged for a year and a half at a time?

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  19. Whoa by TankSpanker04 · · Score: 1

    Imagine life on a spaceship... You and your five crewmates work, exercise, and eat together every day under the glow of fluorescent lights. As the months pass, the sun gets dimmer...

    Did anyone else picture the crew from the original Matrix movie?

  20. We have done long duration missions before. by tjstork · · Score: 5, Interesting

    People keep researching Mars missions, being two years in space, like this would be a singular even in human history because of the isolation. The fact is, humans have been doing long duration missions for quite some time. Old Nantucket whalers could be at sea for a year or two. US Navy personel on deployed aircraft carriers and submarines are at sea isolated for six months at a time, sometimes more. Old explorers on Cook's ships, Magellan's ships, were at sea for years. This has been done. We know how to do this. You have a tight captain, brutal discipline, keep people busy, and the mission continues. If there is a problem, it may only be that the crew of a presently manned Mars mission might be too small for that, but maybe we need to rethink what that crew would be?

    Similarly, for all the talk of why mars, or why colonize space, no one has ever, even the left trying to be diabolical, or the right being religious nutty, ever mentioned the concept of the right to form religious colonies. Like, the pilgrims came to America to form their own fruitcake colony so they could live exactly as they wanted to under god. This gulf between science and religion, at least in the case of colonizing space, need not be so vast. Let's have a government that invests and encourages investment in space, so that, if people do want to have a tax free haven on the moon, or on mars, they can. If they want to have a pledge allegiance to the flag of mars and they think mars was made 6000 years ago, let them. Or, if people want to have a libertine sex colony on the moon, let them. The whole point of expanding into space isn't about commerce, its about, breaking away from a crowded earth that demands rules so we can all get along, in exchange for the promise of a loosely populated place where you can live, like the way you want to.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:We have done long duration missions before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we spend billions, neigh trillions, so that people can go fuck children in space?

      Nice.

    2. Re:We have done long duration missions before. by Mantrid42 · · Score: 1

      Yes, brothers! Our faith will carry us into the stars! For the God Emperor of Mankind! FOR THE IMPERIUM!!

  21. Choose me by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    I've already hit rock bottom so there will be no surprises.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  22. Vitamin D deficiency leading to depression? by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Example: http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/research-reveals-link-between-low-vitamin-d-and-military-suicide/
    "Research published this past week is the first to report that low vitamin D levels are associated with an increased risk for suicide in US military personnel."

    Seasonal Affective Disorder is well known to be correlated with low sunlight levels:
    http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/health-conditions/mental-health-and-learning-disorders/depression/

    So, I can believe blue morning and red evening would help as mentioned in the article, but I would expect that the participants are getting vitamin d deficient too, because the RDAs are generally several times too low (at least in the USA, not sure about Russia). See also: http://www.grassrootshealth.net/recommendation

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  23. Simple Solutions by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

    Aren't there some fairly simple solutions to this "issue"? Provide the spacecraft with more "natural" lighting and give the astronauts earth based work schedule (9-5 job). The article makes these suggestions as well but only in a few sentences in one paragraph out of 10. Astronauts should be deeply involved in adjusting/finalizing the missions survey areas, they can continue training and familiarizing themselves with their equipment and soon to be home. They should have plenty to do on their trip, not laying about waiting for the landing.

  24. But this assumes by kilodelta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That it will take 18 months to get to Mars. I know they're using the rocket model for this but I have to explain:

    Rockets expend a vast amount of their energy just getting free of Earth gravity and then use the acceleration to head toward any object but not under power. So they expend the fuel just within the band of the origin.

    But there's a little technology that is currently propelling a couple of satellites called ion propulsion. It's not a massive dump of energy but a slow, steady one while acceleration increases. Calculation show a trip to Mars would take about 39 days with ion drive. Granted, the spacecraft would be best built in LEO or above that way no aerodynamic issues have to be taken into account. Essentially you'd have something that looks like the lunar lander used in the Apollo program. Not sleek and graceful but sort of cute ugly.

    1. Re:But this assumes by spectral7 · · Score: 2

      39 days to Mars with ion propulsion? Show me your "calculation." DAWN took 9 months, I want to see how you got a 690% improvement without using a megawatt of power or technology less than TRL 7, and how much delta-v you expect the launch vehicle to contribute.

    2. Re:But this assumes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      39 days to Mars with ion propulsion? Show me your "calculation."

      They're talking about VASIMR

      To travel to Mars in 39 days, however, the engine would need 1000 times more power than solar energy could provide. For that, VASIMR would need an onboard nuclear reactor...."That would be quite a ways down the line," Squire says.

  25. This just in.... by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    Astronaughts are not your average joe! At least they weren't initially before we decided to start sending up teachers and the like. Last I knew they don't just take random people, but actually have criteria that must be met first.

    1. Re:This just in.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Astronaughts"??? Really?

    2. Re:This just in.... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You never watched porn with "Astronaughty" in the title? Maybe lots of porn is the solution for the trip. They'll have Carpel Tunnel by the time they get to Mars, but so what? Get a rover to do the rock work.

    3. Re:This just in.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Astronaughts"??? Really?

      Yes, really.

    4. Re:This just in.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only a mushroom would spell it that way. So, again, really?

  26. Re:Don't even USE the word "MAN", BOY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't merit its use yourself...

    APK

    P.S.=> APK is a KNOWN troll -> http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3364827&cid=42513121 and thus, no man, FAR from it... ... apk

  27. option for deal with the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, this may be help-full?

    http://www.rockethub.com/projects/9684-codename-space-pong

  28. Hal open the pod bay doors by gelfling · · Score: 1

    fuck off, Dave, just fuck off.

  29. Hal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't new news... Amundsen talks about the effect in his report on his south pole expedition, and how it was important to have new things to do every day, even when they were over-wintering waiting to start for the polar push, or on the ship on the way down. Sure, the crew probably bitched about cleaning the dog kennels on the ship, or going out in dead of Antarctic winter to estimate the temperature by feel, just in case the thermometers all broke..

    But, you can't beat a report that essentially boils down to: We had a plan to do something really hard that nobody had ever done, we executed the plan, there wasn't much excitement, we got to the pole on schedule, and for the sake of redundancy, actually surveyed 5 possible pole locations. Thanks for sending us.

  30. Asstronaut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all.

  31. It's all relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Astronauts tend to be the ultimate in task oriented workaholics that love what they do.

    An astronaut's version of Lazy would be my version of overwork.

  32. Kneel Armweak by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "That's one small step for a man, and I'd like to keep it that way."

  33. As Bill O'reilly would point out by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Well, they are government workers ;-)

  34. Re:Too lazy by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Twelfth Post!

    -Mars Station 1

  35. oh i dont think you want to do that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    man gets off then other man comes into roomand gets face slapped with goo
    OHHHH the floating horror
    hahahahaha

    no comment on solutions but i aint using devices the same way they use toilets

  36. Houston: "We said map, not nap, dammit" by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Houston: Maybe it wasn't a good idea to name it Tranquility Base.

  37. Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "Fuck it, dude, let's just stop at the moon and put red cellophane over the camera lenses."

  38. Have they never heard of daylight lamps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop saying "fluourescent tubes" as if it was a bad thing! You only picked a shitty color! All colors the sun ever has to our eyes are available as fluorescent tubes!

    With multiple tubes or a simple movable filter, you can easily simulate all colors the sun has throughout the day. Including the UV/IR components.

    Add a diffusion filter in front of it, and it looks like actual sky.

    Come on, this has been solved decades ago! I can build you such a system for less than $100 (probably even less than $50) a piece!

  39. Re:Don't even USE the word "MAN", BOY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear APK,

    I are clearly mentally diseased. I urge you to take advantage of our society's safety nets and health care facilities to get the anti-somethings that you so desperately need. Be careful (but not too careful) not to overdose.

    Love, Anonymous Coward.

    P.S.=> Why should I use a HOSTS file again? I forgot.

  40. No, they don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure that this varies a lot but nuclear submarines are staffed by something like 150 people. It's not the same whether you spend long period of time in isolation with less than a dozen or well over hundred people. Also, despite the cramped corridors, the area in which you can move is a lot larger on a huge submarine than it is on a tiny spaceship. Also, it's not as if the wartime never caused any problems among the submarine crews but I doubt that any critical crew member on a submarine is irreplaceable in the same sense that crew on a mission to Mars is...

    In other words: When NASA says "Our experiments show that unless we can find ways to maintain very earthlike conditions, crew isn't on peak condition after a long space trip", they probably know what they're talking about.

  41. Re:Don't even USE the word "MAN", BOY by bLanark · · Score: 0

    P.S.=> Jeremiah Cornelius is a KNOWN troll -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2238996&cid=36457426

    This is lame. I think JC is one of the better contributors. And I'm not afraid to put my name to this, Mr Coward.

    (I'll be taking a note of my haters at this point in time, and seeing who adds me, to try to find your identity.)

    --
    Note to ACs: I won't mod you up, even if you are being funny or insightful. So take a chance! It's not real life!
  42. Not a Big Deal - Think Polar by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    This is not a big deal. Those of us who live in the north country deal with this every year. We have evolved social methods for handling the lack of sunlight. The further north you go the greater the effect. Much like travel to Mars. In a space ship they can do the same sorts of things. One modern solution is as simple as using lights of the proper spectrum and intensity. Widely used. Not a big deal.

    1. Re:Not a Big Deal - Think Polar by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      This is not a big deal. Those of us who live in the north country deal with this every year. We have evolved social methods for handling the lack of sunlight.

      I'm not sure that heavy drinking, crippling depression, and widespread suicide would be quite as acceptable on a spacecraft...

  43. Re:Don't even USE the word "MAN", BOY by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    Hey, he actually has a healthy sense for it. Sometimes a little shaking up is all you need to resettle in a better local informational equilibrium. Just look at the history of science. That doesn't necessarily imply malice or trolling in the regular sense of the word.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  44. First Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least it would have been if I wasn't such a lazy astronaut on my way to Mars.

  45. So, we're talking about laziness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mission To Mars Log Day 0

    Working hard today, pre-launch. Worky work work.

    Mission To Mars Log Day 1

    We've launched. They're hardly able to fire me now. *slacks off*

    Mission To Mars Log Day 1

    All day in bed. Sweet.

  46. Anyone who saw "Dark Star" ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    ... could see this coming.

  47. Gravity Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering initial weight of Americans and the cost of transporting that weight out of our gravity well... maybe not all that ideal.

    Until we build some sort of fat slingshot or something.

  48. Oh those Russians! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2011/11/04/mars-deep-space-simulation.html

    Or just put a hot Canadian chick on the ship, and let the time just fly by. The fist fights alone would not only keep you in shape, but also entertained! Not to mention the unwanted sexual advances! The Drama! Of course it might be a bit awkward by day 2.

  49. Free Mars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Free Mars!

  50. This was in a film... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have anyone seen Wall-E?.

    Old news. lol

  51. Re:Don't even USE the word "MAN", BOY by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    APK makes it a point to troll JC personally, showing up in his JEs and such. Jeremiah seems to attract folks who hate him, probably because of his politics.

  52. How much lazier can you get? by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    Sending droids to Mars is pretty much as lazy as you can get, NASA just needs to buy some La-Z-boys, bar fridge, and some game controllers and pretty much it could like your working out of your parent's basement.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  53. Re:Don't even USE the word "MAN", BOY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeremiah Cornelius = troll, in his own words -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2238996&cid=36457426

  54. Re:Don't even USE the word "MAN", BOY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0