Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Smartphone Invasion Begins

snydeq writes "Tech giants Apple, Google, and Microsoft were no-shows at CES this week in Las Vegas, which worked out just fine for Chinese vendors looking to establish a name for themselves with U.S. consumers. 'Telecom suppliers Huawei and ZTE, in particular, have set their sights on breaking into the U.S. market for smartphones and tablets. ... Whether these Chinese imports can take on the likes of Apple and Samsung remains to be seen, but as Wired quotes Jeff Lotman, the CEO of Global Icons, an agency that helps companies build and license their brands: "The thing that's amazing is these are huge companies, and they have a lot of power, but in the United States nobody has heard of them and they're having trouble gaining traction, but it's not impossible. Samsung was once known for making crappy, low-end phones and cheap TVs. Now they're seen as a top TV and smartphone brand."'"

181 comments

  1. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one wants crappy, low-end phones that will break within 2 hours.

    1. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If I could pay $20 for a crappy low-end phone that ran Android that would last 6 months, I'd seriously consider it. At that rate, I'd spend $40/yr. which is under half the price I pay now for a cheap Virgin phone (which I buy outright).

      If it was $30 and lasted a year, that'd be even better.

      Sure, the prices aren't there yet, but more competition is only going to drive prices down.

    2. Re:Nope by ickleberry · · Score: 4, Funny

      If that was the case Apple would never have sold a single iPhone

      I'll get my coat..

    3. Re:Nope by RearNakedChoke · · Score: 0

      Forget cheap. Given chinese tendency to install malware on hardware, I wouldn't use a chinese phone to dial 911, much less a smartphone with all my data.

    4. Re:Nope by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This would be great, if only the price of the phone was a significant part of the cost of owning a phone.

      Unfortunately, it's almost a rounding error.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re:Nope by cduffy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Some of us buy our hardware and our plans separately.

      If you do differently, well, that's your own problem.

    6. Re:Nope by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So what?

      The bulk of the cost of owning a smart phone is the cellular service.

      If your phone costs $50, $250, $450, $650, it's about 5-15% of the total cost of ownership.

      In other words, if you're looking more closely at the cost of the phone rather than the functionality of the phone, you're missing the point of owning a smartphone.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    7. Re: Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I work we used ZTE Blade for one year. I did not heat about any of around 40 phones breaking.

    8. Re:Nope by silviuc · · Score: 1

      Their phones are not actually that cheap if we're talking smartphones. I'm looking at some unlocked models here in my country and they compete on price and specs with the better known manufacturers.

    9. Re:Nope by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      I suppose that what you don't know that apple, microsoft, or blackberry installs in your phones would never be malware. I would go to a phone (american, chinese, finnish or from anywhere) that not just runs an open source (so auditable) OS, but also enables you to put in your own version. And so far, the ones willing to go that route are more the chinese than the western ones.

      Now, if you concern is about bad real world performance, or bad battery life, well, i would understand, but is just about picking the right chinese manufacturers.

    10. Re:Nope by mspohr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not sure about your denominator, there, but you can buy voice and data plans for about $30 a month. This is $720 over 2 years.
      It you buy a "top of the line" phone, it will cost you about the same as the service for 2 years (i.e. 50% of ownership cost). If you can get a cheap smartphone, it lowers your costs substantially.
      Just about all Android and Apple smart phones have roughly the same functionality.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    11. Re:Nope by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      You can get a voice/data plan for about $30 a month.

      But you're not going to want to use it with a smart phone.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    12. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a plan with 50 minutes talk and 2 GB data for 10 euros. More than enough for my smartphone needs (it's actually unlimited data, reduced speed after the 2 GB).

    13. Re:Nope by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      But you can't leave your country (that's the size of the average US state) without roaming charges.

      Also, US carriers suck. A lot.

      But because of that, they're a good stock to own - 5-6% dividends.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    14. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno about the US, but 6 months ago in the UK:

      Huawei Ascend G300 - £100 + £5 unlocking
      Unlimited (though now sadly 1GB/month) data, text and a few hundred minutes: £10/month

      So a couple hundred quid for 2 years at which point I'll buy a new phone that's better hardware.

      I can't see the point of spending hundreds or being locked in to an extortionate contract for years for a "premium"/Apple handset.

    15. Re:Nope by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Can you go all across Europe, ie to Spain & Slovenia, without incurring roaming charges?
      Then it's not the same as the US.

      1GB/month - better not watch Netflix on the road, or get a few emails with large attachments. Also, that's not what I want for a smartphone plan. What's the point of having a smartphone?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    16. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think a more important question is: do I go all across Europe, ie to Spain & Slovenia?

      I'd say the answer is no. At least not regularly enough that I'd base my choice of phone plan on this.
      The point of having a smartphone is mostly to show off to other people as far as I can tell. That and email.
      Why would I watch Netflix on the road in Europe?
      It's not even available here.
      Besides, I have a nice big screen at home.
      I'll use that for movies instead of a tiny phone display.

    17. Re:Nope by Kjella · · Score: 2

      Can you go all across Europe, ie to Spain & Slovenia, without incurring roaming charges? Then it's not the same as the US. 1GB/month - better not watch Netflix on the road, or get a few emails with large attachments. Also, that's not what I want for a smartphone plan. What's the point of having a smartphone?

      Well I can't speak for everyone else but I mainly live in my country, sure if I went a lot abroad that might be an issue but my foreign access costs is a rounding error to my vacation costs. I care about the broadband I can get in my daily life, going on vacation is a good time to unwind from that always connected stress too. And if I did it because of work then I'd insist they pay, not me. Oh and the EU has brought the charges down to moderately unreasonable, you're not fleeced quite as bad as you used to be.

      Yes, if you must stream Netflix you have a problem. But if your smart phone is topped off with apps and games and music and movies and whatever else you want from your wifi at home, then meh... I don't come close to 1 GB/month I think, and yet it's incredibly useful to me. YMMV.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    18. Re:Nope by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      By the way, 15% is not, as you say, a "rounding error".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    19. Re:Nope by evilviper · · Score: 1

      If I could pay $20 for a crappy low-end phone that ran Android that would last 6 months, I'd seriously consider it. At that rate, I'd spend $40/yr. which is under half the price I pay now for a cheap Virgin phone (which I buy outright).

      The Alcatel Venture costs $40, and will probably last for a year. If nothing else, you can buy it some place that'll give you a 3-year extended warranty for $15 more....

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    20. Re:Nope by fredprado · · Score: 1

      Most people don't leave their countries frequently, that is true for America, Europe, Asia and basically everywhere else.

    21. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no I can't. Can you?

      Do you incur roaming charges in the states by going from one state to another? I dunno. That's why I said "Dunno about the US".

      Anyway it was unlimited but it's not not now, sadly. But I don't go anywhere near it anyway. It's more than enough to read/post crap on slashdot, get mail, antisocial networking, make IAX calls, read PDFs, use maps, etc.

      Why would I want to watch netflix on the road? I mostly use the tube - there's no reception and videos I have put on the SD card play fine.

      Horses for courses.

    22. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys seem to be screwed big time there. Am paying 10$ a month for infinite calls/sms BS 500MB of internet a month in southern Europe :)

    23. Re:Nope by cduffy · · Score: 1

      The bulk of the cost of owning a smart phone is the cellular service.

      The cost of service is part of the cost of owning a phone, but it's not part of the cost of the phone!

      If we're talking about new phone manufacturers trying to get into the market, it's the cost of phones that matters for purposes of determining if they're competitive with other makers of phones. Discussing cost-of-service is an irrelevant distraction.

    24. Re:Nope by chargersfan420 · · Score: 1

      Sure, you say that now, but having to deal with getting a replacement every 6 months, not to mention the week or so that you're hobbling along because the phone is clearly on its last legs, would probably make you change your tune after a cheap phone or two.

    25. Re:Nope by turbidostato · · Score: 2

      "No one wants crappy, low-end phones that will break within 2 hours."

      Certainly not.

      On the other hand, I wanted an smartphone capable of managing two SIM cards, 4" screen (I don't want bigger), with Android and a big fat battery. No way finding something like that from any of the "big brands".

      I'm a consumer and I vote with my wallet. Would you think all these capitalist-grown companies knows that?

      Well, I ended buying a Chinese Jiayu G2 http://www.pandawill.com/jiayu-g2-smart-phone-40-inch-ips-screen-android-40-mtk6577-10ghz-3g-gps-black-p70479.html
      which costed me 120â including air transport with a charger and an extra battery and, after about three months of heavy usage, I'd say it is a best buy.

      Did I buy it because it was cheap? No -but it certainly costed me about 1/5 of a big brand -if they had something like that in catalogue, I mean. I bought it because that was what I wanted to buy.

      I suppose that's capitalism in action, it's only I find funny it has to be somebody from the only big known comunist country in the world the one to teach that lesson.

    26. Re:Nope by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "If your phone costs $50, $250, $450, $650, it's about 5-15% of the total cost of ownership."

      I claim bullshit on that.

      My last but one phone, a Samsung Galaxy S, costed me 450 EUR and lasted me in good use about 2 years.

      My voice/data plan (500MB/month, enough for my light usage) was 25EUR/month, which means 600EUR on those two years.

      So, 450 versus 600, hardly neglegible cost.

      Now I own a Chinese smarphone that costed me 120EUR and doesn't look it's going to have a shorter live than my older Samsung (and, as I already told in a previous message, I didn't even buy it because of the price but because of its feature set) so that means about 30% less for what I consider a better product.

      Now, go figure.

    27. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get 5GB data for £8.27 a month, I have pay-as-you-go sim for voice and text which I spend maybe £30-40 a year on. Works nicely with a dual-sim smartphone.

      I spent £110 on a cheap dual-sim smartphone, if I keep the phone for 18 months that works out to 35% of the total cost, if I only keep it 12 months it will be 45% of the cost.

    28. Re:Nope by ozmanjusri · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They're cheap enough.

      I have a Star N8000 (AU$130) which I've had for about a year now (Galaxy Note clone), and a JiaYu G3 (AU$230) just bought.

      The Star runs Android 4.03 nicely, has been very robust (in a standard supplied cover) and performs well. I bought it for it's dual SIM capability which makes staying connected while travelling much easier and cheaper, but it's become my main phone because it's so versatile (even includes an analogue TV tuner).

      The G3 is new, but so far it feels nicely made. It's very fast, has a brilliant display, two SIMs and runs Jelly Bean. I bought it to test, but my GF saw it when it arrived, so I haven't been able to do much testing... It's easily the slickest phone I have (limited) access to.

      I have no doubt that the Galaxy SIII and iPhone are well made, but in Australia they're triple the price of my phones and less versatile.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    29. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given chinese tendency to install malware on hardware,

      Death twitches - Nokia caught wiretapping encrypted traffic from its handsets

      http://falkvinge.net/2013/01/11/death-twitches-nokia-caught-wiretapping-encrypted-traffic-from-its-handsets/

    30. Re:Nope by horza · · Score: 2

      We pay 19.99 here for unlimited calls to fixed and mobiles, fixed lines all over Europe plus USA and Canada, unlimited SMS and MMS, unlimited Internet for the first 3GB and reduced speeds after. As my smartphone has wifi, I can watch video all day long at home and work and not even touch my uncapped data.

      Phillip.

    31. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me it's about 60/40 in favour of the phone. My Galaxy Nexus was £300 SIM free. My contract is £10 a month for 12 months which gets me 300 minutes, 1.5GB data and unlimited texts. I surf constantly, check emails constantly and I struggle to break 500MB a month usually. Lots of pictures consumed, but not much 'big' media like videos. So my contract is about a third of the price of the phone for one year.

      For me the price of the phone is very much a big factor. It's bizarre, you're offered a £20 a month contract and then charged £150 for the phone on top and it doesn't even really belong to you. I'd much rather sever the links between service and hardware.

    32. Re:Nope by horza · · Score: 1

      In my business I live on on my phone. In Europe it's not so bad but outside the roaming charges are exorbitant. I spent $100 on one relatively short phone call when last in Ukraine. Fortunately most places have free wifi in nearly every bar and restaurant. If somebody calls just hit reject and dial them straight back for free on Viber (or whatever voip you use). If you see you have a large attachment just wait until you get until the hotel until you download it.

      I should point out that Spain and Slovenia are different countries. I'm not sure why a phone bought in one should be used for free in the other?

      Phillip.

    33. Re:Nope by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      I just got a Nexus 4 and signed up for a $30/month plan with T-Mobile. It comes with 100 minutes and a soft cap of 5gb at 4G speeds. I use my phone more as a portable computer than a phone, so the low minutes are fine by me. For long calls, I use Google Voice for free with GrooVeIP.

      The two year cost including the phone is $300 + $30*24 = $1020. A high-end phone with 5gb of 4G data on contract with one of the other carriers would be about twice that.

    34. Re:Nope by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      That's the point. Cheap phones breajk tuat model.

    35. Re:Nope by mlts · · Score: 1

      If I could root and unlock the device's bootloader, and there is some type of custom ROM ecosystem for the device, so much the better. In the past, I'd use Titanium Backup to save stuff to the SD card [1]. Worst case, I need to install the app on the new device via Google Play, then copy its data from the TB stash. If I were moving between the same model of devices, then nandroid becomes useful. As a secondary backup, Titanium Backup and another app made by the same people can sync data to Dropbox, so if the phone is lost completely, it isn't too bad a hit.

      [1]: Call me crazy, but even though newer phones have 64GB of onboard storage, I wish they had a SDXC slot, just for backup reasons... phones are plenty thin, and the Android trend towards phablets [2] definitely provides some real estate where a card can fit.

      [2]: I also wish Android phone makers would go to a smaller, but higher DPI screen. My HTC One X+ with a decent case won't even fit into a drink holder. I'm guessing one reason for the larger sizes is more heat dissipation required for the quad-core CPUs.

    36. Re:Nope by mlts · · Score: 1

      From what I know about Chinese phones, they don't bother much with trying to have locked bootloaders, or anti-rooting measures. The hardware is meant to be mass-produced with a decently functional ROM in place (perhaps with an update or two to fix device issues.)

      Of course, dual-SIM functionality comes into handy as well. Not just work/home lines, but if one does travel, one could get a disposable SIM from a Canadian/Mexican provider as well as the usual telco in the US.

      The US has the iPhone, but other than that, there are a lot of advances in other smartphone ecosystems that end up our shores months to years after they are commonplace overseas. Quad-core CPUs are one example.

    37. Re:Nope by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Europe isn't a country (yet).

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    38. Re:Nope by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Apparently you don't live in the same Europe as I do, then.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    39. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Europe it's not so bad but outside the roaming charges are exorbitant. I spent $100 on one relatively short phone call when last in Ukraine. ...

      I should point out that Spain and Slovenia are different countries...

      And I should point out that, last time I checked on the map, Ukraine was still in Europe. When did it move away?

    40. Re:Nope by fredprado · · Score: 1

      Neither is America nor Asia. All are continents.

    41. Re:Nope by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

      Most people don't move out of state more than once a year, even in the USA. If the USA telcos were to offer cheaper subscriptions that would only work in your home state, I'm fairly certain over 80 percent of phone users would get one of those plans.

      If you do have to go abroad, often people buy a local SIM with a prepayed package on it for E10 or something. You can often get 1G or more on your holiday destination for that sort of money, often with hundreds of minutes of local calls as well. Spending anywhere up to E50 in such "roaming costs" each year is still a lot cheaper than having to pay for "all around Europe" for 365 days a year while in reality, you usually don't need that for more than a few weeks.

      I agree that 1G is rather limited for "power users". However, in reality over 80% of cell phone users just don't consume that amount of data right now. That may be a chicken/egg thing, data usage may be rising fast, but right now, over 1G/month isn't going to bother a lot of users.

      --
      I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    42. Re:Nope by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      Can you go all across Europe, ie to Spain & Slovenia, without incurring roaming charges? Then it's not the same as the US.

      1GB/month - better not watch Netflix on the road, or get a few emails with large attachments. Also, that's not what I want for a smartphone plan. What's the point of having a smartphone?

      Thr USA = 1 nation
      Europe =many nations
      what part of that do you not get???
      btw you get can unlimited data with 200 minutes and 5000 texts from 3 for £12.90 GBP as my gf does, i get 2000 minutes ,5000 texts,unlimited data for 30 gbp

    43. Re:Nope by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      And I should point out that, last time I checked on the map, Ukraine was still in Europe. When did it move away?

      and i should point out its not an EU member covered by EU roaming regulations on pricing

    44. Re:Nope by Pale+Dot · · Score: 1

      Neither is America;)

    45. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a huawei u8655-1 and while it isn't an iphone, for nz$150 i don't give a crap when I can have something 90% as good for just over 10% the price.

      iPhones are shit value for money, as is anything samsung.

    46. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think so, but in reality there is Europe-Europe (most of the EU and some promising candidate states), and there is the rest of Europe (Greece, Albania, Ukraine etc.)

    47. Re:Nope by yotto · · Score: 1

      Neither is America nor Asia. All are continents.

      While we're being pedantic, America is not a continent.

    48. Re:Nope by staalmannen · · Score: 1

      But you can't leave your country (that's the size of the average US state) without roaming charges.

      Also, US carriers suck. A lot.

      But because of that, they're a good stock to own - 5-6% dividends.

      As being one that move between two countries in Europe frequently, I must say that this generally is a non-issue. You simply use a pay-as-you go topup SIM for each country. My primary SIM got a 2GB free data per 15€ topup + 1h free calls/day to others of the same carrier and normal fares to other networks or landlines. The thing is, all European carriers are using the same standardized protocols (GSM and whatever the 3- and 4G standards are called).

    49. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europe isn't a country (yet).

      Thank God !

    50. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I would. What I wouldn't do is to use that as my primary desktop internet.

      Although to be honest I have no idea what kind of screwoverdeals you get on that side of the ocean. My 20€ phone intarweb is plenty good enough for irc, web and maps i.e. whatever I usually bother to use it on a phone for.

    51. Re:Nope by fredprado · · Score: 1

      Sure it is. Unless you are a silly US citizen that (un)learned distorted Geography is US.

    52. Re:Nope by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      Depends on what continent model you follow. Most english speaking countries (and many other regions) are taught the 7 continent model which splits "america" into North America and South America. According to wikipedia China, India and Western Europe are taught this model as well.

      The 6 continent model with a combined America is apparently taught in "Spanish-speaking countries and in some parts of Eastern Europe including Greece".

      Stating one model is wrong when there are multiple accepted models is simple ignorance.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    53. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My phone expenses for the previous year were below 120$. I know because I never had more than 10$ billed for any month. Includes 3G internet data. YMMV. So yes, for me cheap hardware is not a rounding error.

    54. Re:Nope by fredprado · · Score: 1

      Actually stating that America is not a continent, as if the only continent model that exists is yours is what can be classified as ignorance. America is a continent in the continent model used by both the UN and the Olympic Committee.

    55. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a nation called Idiotland in Europe? Must be if that's where you live.

    56. Re:Nope by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

      I plan to: T-Mobile has $30 for 5gb 4G+unlimited txt+100 min. talk and Ting's plans are only for smartphones; both get good reviews.

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
    57. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good God you know how to derail a conversation. If you don't have anything to add about Chinese smartphones, shut the fuck up about your stock dividends.

    58. Re:Nope by nobodie · · Score: 1

      same in Asia. the P was not talking from experience i fear

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    59. Re:Nope by cduffy · · Score: 1

      If your phone costs $50, $250, $450, $650, it's about 5-15% of the total cost of ownership.

      Seen T-Mobile's Monthly 4G plan? $30/month for unlimited data and 100 minutes.

      And talking about "total cost of ownership" is silly. First, a smartphone plan isn't part of legitimate TCO -- I gave my mother my old smartphone, and she doesn't have any plan for it at all -- she uses it around her house with her local wifi. Second, it makes unnecessary and useless assumptions about aligning the phone-buying cycle with the plan-renewal cycle.

      If you use TCO arguments to convince yourself to pay too much for a phone simply because you're paying too much for a service -- you, sir, are an idiot.

    60. Re:Nope by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      I've been using a Huwaei tablet and a ZTE phone which came together as an upgrade bundle (with a 3G SIM for the tablet) nearly a year ago. Both working fine, despite both being dropped on multiple occasions.

      Nothing wrong with these in terms of endurance. The tablet works AND fits in my jacket pocket, so gets infinitely more use than an iPad (or whatever the Samsung thing is called (Galaxy 10). Neither fit in my pocket ; neither got considered beyond that metric. The phone ... is a phone. What more is there to say?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. I've got a Chinese smartphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's sold under the Apple brand.

    1. Re:I've got a Chinese smartphone by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      There was an earlier discussion about that. Afaict, the answer is "not really", but some of the Japanese and Korean brands may have a bigger proportion of their production done in, respectively, Japan and Korea.

    2. Re:I've got a Chinese smartphone by NatasRevol · · Score: 0

      Well, Samsung's Austin plant is planning on making the A5 in the iPhone.

      And Apple is shifting silicon production to TSM, based mostly in New York.

      It's just the CPU, but it's a step in that direction. For better or/and worse.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    3. Re:I've got a Chinese smartphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You must have meant to say SamDung brand. Thats the only maker of crappy phones that knock off Apple products.

      I've never heard of "SamDung", but going by the name, that sounds more likely to be a low-rent knock-off of "Samsung", a Korean company well-known for their high-quality smartphones. Hope this explains things for you! ;-)

    4. Re:I've got a Chinese smartphone by x0d · · Score: 1

      There were a few http://www.neowin.net/news/nokia-has-made-its-final-phone-in-its-native-finland . Right up until Mid-2012 and I'm sure they're are/were not the only ones.

    5. Re:I've got a Chinese smartphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how was this marked insightful? practically EVERY tech product is made in china. apple is an american company, however. they design the phone, market it, sell it, and reap all the profits.

      just like every other american tech company.

    6. Re:I've got a Chinese smartphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok you had your say now go back to sucking steves cold dead cock

    7. Re:I've got a Chinese smartphone by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

      Samsung is not successful because they have high quality phones. They are successful because they spend so much on marketing.

    8. Re:I've got a Chinese smartphone by iserlohn · · Score: 1

      I have a Nexus One, Nexus Galaxy and Nexus 4 and they were made in Taiwan, S.Korea and S.Korea respectively.

      From first-hand experience and information collected around the net -

      Samsung makes its flagship phones mostly in South Korea
      LG makes its flagship phones in South Korea
      HTC makes its phones mostly in Taiwan

      I'm sure a lot of Japanese phones (e.g. Sharp) is produced in Japan as well

    9. Re:I've got a Chinese smartphone by ahabswhale · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing almost all of the parts are made in China and they are just assembled in Korea.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    10. Re:I've got a Chinese smartphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having owned two Sharps and two Fujitsus, Sharp sources most of its parts from Chinese plants (with the labels "Made in China" all over the phone's components that I can see without taking it apart), while most of the components on my Fujitsu phones are marked "made in Japan".

  3. And they will not establish a foothold. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have used a LOT of china smartphones. and they all suck badly. really poor Android installs, really REALLY bad hardware. Innovative ideas, I LOVE the dual sim phones, but they either come with batteries that are garbage or the phone it self has QC issues that make it a swing and a miss.

    So unless they have a dual core 1.5ghz Android 4.2 phone for $29.00 unlocked... they will not sell many.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:And they will not establish a foothold. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not now, but maybe later. As the summary states Samsung wasn't that great either and it took a long time for it to get in that position.

      But I don't think they'll ever gain a foothold as long as the best Chinese engineers move elsewhere to live. It's why the only Chinese fabs that are relevant are in Singapore or Taiwan. Nobody likes to live in a polluted poor shithole. Samsung is in Korea which is relatively developed.

    2. Re:And they will not establish a foothold. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've used a lot of American, Japanese and Korean smartphones with really poor Android installs and really bad hardware.

      I've also used some really good ones. There are some damn nice phones coming out of China now, quad core and vanilla Android nice.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:And they will not establish a foothold. by Alex+Zepeda · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, we use ZTE modems (embedded stuff) at work. It's a tossup between the support and the product as to which is actually worse. None of our vendors enjoy selling ZTE products. Our standard policy is to ship the modems from the vendor to ZTE to ensure proper configuration. We've had one batch that was provisioned for a Chinese telecom, so we ended up "roaming" on our carrier and were assigned IP addresses owned by a Chinese company. All of the ZTE documentation for this particular modem is for the latest version of the firmware (which is not backwards compatible with the previous version of the firmware). Well, despite sending all of these things back to ZTE, only a handful of the modems have the current, documented version of the firmware. Despite asking for documentation for the older version of the firmware, ZTE has refused to provide any. Their solution is to recall hundreds of modems, ship them to ZTE and hope for the best. The firmware is not user updatable.

      No. Thanks.

      I feel for any carrier that things hawking ZTE phones will be a reasonable experience.

      --
      The revolution will be mocked
    4. Re:And they will not establish a foothold. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as long as the best Chinese engineers move elsewhere to live. It's why the only Chinese fabs that are relevant are in Singapore or Taiwan

      Just imagine what those Mainlanders could do with stealth fighters, interplanetary satellites, manned space program, etc if they actually had some top scientists left in the country.

      Nobody likes to live in a polluted poor shithole

      There are reportedly some 100k westerners in Shanghai alone. Guess there are differences in sanitation standards among the populace.

    5. Re:And they will not establish a foothold. by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "So unless they have a dual core 1.5ghz Android 4.2 phone for $29.00 unlocked... they will not sell many."

      No, but you have a lot for 129$ still a very good bang for the buck.

    6. Re:And they will not establish a foothold. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      vanilla Android

      That must be Ice Cream Sandwich. Typical Android phone, ships with an old OS version.

    7. Re:And they will not establish a foothold. by DavidClarkeHR · · Score: 1

      No, but you have a lot for 129$ still a very good bang for the buck.

      Compared to 2002, most modern smart phones are great bang-for-buck.

      --
      - Nec Impar Pluribus, or so I'm told.
    8. Re:And they will not establish a foothold. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iFon was a good alternative smartphone before Android arrived.

    9. Re:And they will not establish a foothold. by bedouin · · Score: 1

      My ISP gave me a ZTE 3G modem. The 3G router I plugged it into would randomly report that the modem was unplugged, sometimes after a couple days; sometimes after five minutes. After trying every firmware release I could with the router I gave up, unlocked a friend's unused modem from another manufacture, and have been fine ever since.

    10. Re:And they will not establish a foothold. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      chinese smartphone's software is bad.

    11. Re:And they will not establish a foothold. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently picked up a Neo M02. 4" display, 1GB of RAM, and a dual core MT6577 CPU. For $150, I got something that runs ICS pretty well at the cost of about a day of my time to remove all the non-English software and install the Google marketplace. Alcatel built a phone with this CPU, so the kernel source is available in the wild.

    12. Re:And they will not establish a foothold. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      you have not use any american Smartphones. None exist, There is not one cellphone on this planet you can buy that was made in america.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  4. The big names were a no-show... by PantherSE · · Score: 4, Informative

    because they're big enough brands to have a show of their own. Why spend the money on an event where you have to fight for attention when you've established your brand enough that the media clamors to be invited to your event?

    1. Re:The big names were a no-show... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      They weren't really no-shows, either. Who do you think is providing the software that runs on those phones? The same big name companies that were supposedly "absent".

    2. Re:The big names were a no-show... by bedouin · · Score: 0

      In Samsung's case, a big name company was even supplying their hardware designs -- albeit unwillingly.

  5. Well Huawei need a better consumer brand name by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Branding does matter, and Huawei is rather odd to American ears.

    Other than that it'll be all about what they can offer in terms of price, features, and quality. Quality seems to be a big issue for many Chinese brands. They focus on low price above all else, and drive quality down too far. This could be a particular issue in the smartphone market where carries want to lock people in to 2 year contracts. That means that equipment needs to survive for 2 years, or you'll have angry customers.

    1. Re:Well Huawei need a better consumer brand name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As compared to the strange sounding Hyundai, Volkswagen, Nokia, Nissan, Lenovo, etc... They do OK in US market.

    2. Re:Well Huawei need a better consumer brand name by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

      They also have a brand problem in general. PR people must be salivating...

      US Congress Rules Huawei a security threat, Vulnerabilities, may scare off customers.

    3. Re:Well Huawei need a better consumer brand name by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Rename Huawei to Chuck Norris - then it will really kick ass!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    4. Re:Well Huawei need a better consumer brand name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huawei isn't just "odd to American ears", they're also involved in espionage ... so there's that.

    5. Re:Well Huawei need a better consumer brand name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hrm, so how about something like Spyware? That sounds like a good name for a company, right?

    6. Re:Well Huawei need a better consumer brand name by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      As compared to the strange sounding Hyundai, Volkswagen, Nokia, Nissan, Lenovo, etc... They do OK in US market.

      Better to say "they did OK in the US market eventually". Yes, they all had acceptance problems when they first appeared over here, mostly because most people prefer familiar brands to unfamiliar.

      In a few years, the Chinese smartphone brands will sort themselves out into "good reputation" and "cheap garbage", and the former will do well, and the latter will quietly rebrand themselves and try again.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    7. Re:Well Huawei need a better consumer brand name by bedouin · · Score: 1

      If you call it Chuck Norris people will just continue to associated their product with cheap, outdated things that no one really wants.

    8. Re:Well Huawei need a better consumer brand name by bedouin · · Score: 1

      Those names roll off the tongue easily enough though. Except for Hyundai, the other brands have pretty obvious pronunciations. Huawei is a strange construction for an English speaker, comprised of four vowel sounds in a three syllable word, with two of them being consecutive.

    9. Re:Well Huawei need a better consumer brand name by Zanadou · · Score: 1

      Those names roll off the tongue easily enough though. Except for Hyundai, the other brands have pretty obvious pronunciations.

      Not really. Most native English speakers mangle "Hyundai" into three syllables ("Hi-yoon-die"), but in Korean it's actually only two ("H'yoon-deh").

      But, I think the question here is that some "foreign" names are taken by English speakers who make them into something all together different.

  6. You can get non-chinese phones? Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are you getting these non-chinese phones? I haven't seen one in twenty years.

    Oh, wait, you were just being an ignorant racist, you don't actually know of any phones that aren't made in China. My bad.

  7. Product availability by Animats · · Score: 1

    "Still, Hisense products are tough to find in the U.S. outside of Walmart, Amazon.com and Costco.com."

    Other than Target, that's everybody that matters in electronics and appliances.

    1. Re:Product availability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I've learned anything at RadioShack it's that they really really REALLY matter when it comes to phones.

  8. Re:You can get non-chinese phones? Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gotta love it when some asshole comes out of the woodwork to call people racist for no reason.

    When you buy an iPhone, Apple is behind that device, even if it's made in China.

  9. Sure, why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every other position has gone overseas, I want to see some big CEOs here lose their jobs to the overseas companies they helped fund.
    Mmm...sweet irony.

  10. Re:I own a ZTE v875 by miknix · · Score: 4, Informative

    I own a ZTE v875, which I got for around 80 euros as a carrier exclusive (TMN Smart A7). The phone is really really good for the value, in fact, I would get it again if something happens to it. It has everything what you would expect from a good Android phone. The GPS is even better, I often get more precision from the location services than my friends with higher end phones. The qwerty keyboard is awesome and the main reason why I bought this phone. There is a minor problem though, you need to use a plastic plug in the headphones jack, otherwise sand and dust comes in and stays between the touchscreen and the LCD - annoying. Other than that, the phone is very serviceable, I already opened it a couple of times to clean the sand / dust. In fact, I even managed to accidentally cut 5 of the LCD flex cable vias while trying to unplug it. Fortunately I have steady hands and a good soldering iron :)
    Other than that, I'm stuck with gingerbread. The internal storage is quite small, however I have root access which allows me to move apps around to circumvent the small internal (permanent) memory. The battery autonomy is ok, with 3G on at all times I always have more than 1 day of battery.... if I dont abuse google maps.

  11. OS by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    More manufacturers wanting to differenciate themselves from the rest means also more diversity on the software front. Thats from where Sailfish, Tizen, Firefox OS, and even Open Web OS phones will come.

    The "We have the virtual monopoly so no need to innovate" mentality is about to get a hit (unless they use other tactics counterattack, like claiming that they will attack your privacy (even more than the US government is doing with everything US based), or with patents (after all the Apple fight to ban Samsung phones from US or Europe, this could happen too ).

    1. Re:OS by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      More manufacturers wanting to differenciate themselves from the rest means also more diversity on the software front. Thats from where Sailfish, Tizen, Firefox OS, and even Open Web OS phones will come.

      So far it just seems to mean an ever more fragmented Android.

  12. Samsung wasn't the only one... by bmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    LG used to be known as Gold Star. Gold Star was known as the "junk" brand of Sears, K-Mart, Zayre (oooh, I'm old) and other stores that targeted the low end consumer.

    Gold Star had such a bad reputation that they changed their name to LG which stands for Lucky Gold Star.

    Those that pooh-pooh the Chinese brands are ignoring all of the history since WWII. We used to laugh at Honda, Toyota, Kawasaki, Sony, NEC, Yamaha, and all the other Japanese brands, and now they high quality and popular (even luxury brands!). The American car and electronics manufacturers were complacent and we nearly completely lost automobile manufacturing entirely *twice* - only to be bailed out with government loans. We lost consumer electronics manufacturing entirely in the US.

    Korean brands used to have a ridiculously bad reputation. Now we have Korean brands that people are more than willing to buy, sometimes preferring them over Japanese brands like Sharp. Hyundai used to be viewed as a disposable car (I had an Excel at one point). Now they are good quality transportation, as good as anything Japanese (but maybe not Infiniti or Acura).

    And now we have idiots replying to this story saying that the Chinese will never make higher quality goods, as if the Chinese are somehow inherently inferior. This smacks of denial and racism, frankly, the same kind of denial and racism that we used against the Japanese and Koreans, before the Japanese and Koreans kicked our asses in manufacturing.

    It feels good to think that you're superior to other people...but this is delusional. This is why Jared Diamond's book angered so many conservatives - he exposed the environmental, food, and natural transportation advantages people in the Middle East and Europe had over other locations on the planet. He detailed how these advantages were the real reason why European civilization became so successful, instead of some inherent quality of "white" people. And you see this every day. You see it in the denial that "those people over there" can't possibly be as good scientists and engineers as we in the US are.

    It's a dumb worldview, and eventually self-defeating, because where the manufacturing goes, the science and engineering goes too. We here in the US are not special. Complacency brings down empires - political and economic both. We have been complacent for 60 years, because we thought the post WWII boom would go on forever.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me some good Chinese products and I'll change my tune...

    2. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as good as Acura or Infiniti? Not the incumbent for quality, Lexus?

    3. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      same goes for educatiom here at home. We have a system built around 20% of the people are "smart". They take the honors classes and go to college. This is totally fabricated. "Smart" is mostly based on the number of utterances directed towards one as a child. But even early advantages can be easily be made up for by 90% of the population if effort is made before the sixth grade.

    4. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      The American car and electronics manufacturers were complacent and we nearly completely lost automobile manufacturing entirely *twice* - only to be bailed out with government loans.

      Ford stayed strong throughout the economic recession, did not require any bailout, posted record profits, and produces the best selling car in the world. Two specific automakers were poorly managed and operated, and when the economy tanked, they couldn't survive. Perhaps they should have been allowed to fail so the stronger, better operated companies could have taken over their share. Regardless, the USA did not almost lose the entire automobile industry, as Ford is still a world leader.

      We lost consumer electronics manufacturing entirely in the US.

      No, we sent it away on purpose. It was cheaper to have other countries manufacture those products, so Americans can buy them cheaper. One thing people tend to overlook - a lot of the jobs people lament us having lost are jobs that most Americans would never want to have. What will happen next is that robotics will become even cheaper than Asian labor, and as the jobs were not in the USA to begin with, we won't see unions fighting robotic factories, as they will not cause Americans to lose their jobs. Thus I predict a great deal of manufacturing will return to the USA in the form of robotic assembly lines soon, especially when artificially maintained bubbles, like the Chinese currency, the Chinese production of cheap rare earths, and the Chinese people's willingness to produce products they could never afford to buy, all begin to burst.

      And now we have idiots replying to this story saying that the Chinese will never make higher quality goods, as if the Chinese are somehow inherently inferior. This smacks of denial and racism, frankly, the same kind of denial and racism that we used against the Japanese and Koreans, before the Japanese and Koreans kicked our asses in manufacturing.

      And you are being a Bigot in assuming that the Japanese and Chinese are exactly the same and capable of the same accomplishments because they all look Asian. However, that's entirely beside the point. The Japanese flourished for a number of reasons, one of which is because of their style of government and economy. It fostered creativity, engineering, and improving on others' designs. It is yet to be seen if China's Communist government can achieve the same level accomplishment just because the party dictated that the workers should do it. There is a tremendous amount of corruption in that government which leads to inefficiencies and a constant skimming-off-the-top at every level. So no, it is not a given that the Chinese can become the next Japan or South Korea. Take a close look at the governments of Japan, South Korea, the USA and China, and see if you can find any pattern there associated with the country's technical innovations and breakthroughs.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    5. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by bmo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And you are being a Bigot in assuming that the Japanese and Chinese are exactly the same and capable of the same accomplishments because they all look Asian.

      No, I am saying that they are exactly the same and capable of the same because they are *human beings*.

      Meet your new status, fuckhead.

      --
      BMO

    6. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me some good Chinese products and I'll change my tune...

      It's reached a point now that I can say this without reservation:

      We have here the utterance of a bitter man with a house full of Chinese products.
      Seems like you've seen a lot of good Chinese products judging from your personal collection.

      Sorry to out you like this.

    7. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying everyone is the same is to ignore the impact of culture. Culture has a profound impact on economic ability. China's culture is vastly different from Japan's and Korea's. China has deeply ingrained cultural problems that diminish the quality of their companies' products.

      If a Japanese worker tells his boss there's a problem that should be fixed he wins kudos. A Chinese worker in the same situation loses kudos for making the boss lose face. The issues are myriad.

    8. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To anoint Ford as some kind of jewel of industrialism, when the title the best of the worst is probably more appropriate.
      Ford Taurus *cough* shitbox, outsold Camry and Accord for years (fleet sale, rental company, ...).
      As a casual observer, I would hazard to guess Ford/American automobile industry survival is not even close to being assured amidst fierce competition (ironically from the likes of the Chinese who produce some very good automobiles by many accounts).

      And you are being a Bigot in assuming that the Japanese and Chinese are exactly the same and capable of the same accomplishments because they all look Asian

      To start with, this has a number of logic and grammatical errors that doesn't really inspire confidence in your analytic talents.
      If anything, historically the Chinese produced "superior" products to the Japanese, to the extent Japanese language, ceramics, metallurgy, textile, arts, ...all copied extensively from the Chinese as a starting point.

      Japanese....improving on others' designs

      So I'm guessing you don't have a problem with the Chinese copying western tech as the Japanese did?

    9. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      No, I am saying that they are exactly the same and capable of the same because they are *human beings*.

      You are a deluded fool. Who wins all the worlds major marathons and why? If you think all human beings, or even races, are equal then you ignore the blatantly obvious. Further, human beings exist inside of a society and economy. Those constructs limit what they can and cannot do. I can only presume you do not know the difference between China and Japan, and only see them as blobs of generic people, so it is impossible to have a rational discussion with you on the matter.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    10. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless of the quality of Lexus cars, their drivers are all assholes.

    11. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The United States is the world's largest manufacturer, with a 2007 industrial output of US$2.69 trillion. In 2008, its manufacturing output was greater than that of the manufacturing output of China, India, and Brazil combined, despite manufacturing being a very small portion of the entire US economy as compared to most other countries."

      Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_in_the_United_States

    12. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blaming society for the fact that you're a moron? Ooh, clever.

    13. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was just insightful enough to be wrong. Cultural differences are real but they tend to get leveled out in similar ways. In biology they call it 'convergent evolution'.

      Remember in the 19th century Americans were calling Japanese a naturally lazy people. We tend to end up overstating differences.

      Oh and your point about marathons? Who wins them? Kenyans are dominant, but what other group is over represented? Moroccans.

      The Kenyans come from mountain areas where they run long distances to school in thin air.
      And the Moroccans. They come from the Atlas Mountain areas, also where you have to get by on foot in thin air.

    14. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but you're pretty much wrong here. Just stop.

    15. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Except China has yet to really produce much for Western consumption which isn't generally considered to be 'crap'. Yes they produce some things for other companies, under external control, but nothing "Chinese". So why is that? They've been exporting to the US and the West as a whole for much longer than Japan had to spin up their electronics and car excellence.

      I'm not saying it won't happen, I'm just saying it hasn't happened yet, and I'm curious as to why. We've even got companies moving back to stateside production (Whirlpool) because China production sucked, had high costs for turnaround and development, and lead to a lack of significant improvement for the most part of a decade.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    16. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by bmo · · Score: 1

      >I'm not saying it won't happen, I'm just saying it hasn't happened yet, and I'm curious as to why.

      China lagged behind both Korea and Japan because of two things:

      WWII (the Japanese invaded and such) and the Cultural Revolution. While WWII and the Korean War interfered with both the advancement of Japan and Korea, Japan was rapidly built up after the war and so was Korea after the Korean war. Because they were our buds and we gave them money to do so, because COMMUNISM.

      China had to contend with the Cultural Revolution, which didn't really end when Mao died. The Cultural Revolution was also an anti-intellectual revolt due to misguided nativism - anything too "western" was counter-revolutionary and "bad" and that included engineering. It had to take Deng Xiaoping to start implementing reforms, and by that time, you're talking 1987 when he left office and reforms were underway, while Japan was *already* a manufacturing giant with luxury brands, and Korea was really beginning to become an economic and manufacturing powerhouse.

      The PRC leadership now values anything that can advance STEM. They actually give it a lot more weight than we do here in the US. STEM is no longer viewed as "western."

      It's no longer a question of "if" China will become an engineering powerhouse as well as the manufacturing giant it is, but when.

      Give it 10 more years, which is a lot shorter than it seems right now.

      --
      BMO

    17. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      > Ford stayed strong throughout the economic recession, did not require any
      > bailout, posted record profits, and produces the best selling car in the world.

      Correction. Ford was going down to the same hot place in the same handbasket as GM. Bonds of both companies were downgraded to junk-bond status in early May of 2005 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A41573-2005May6.html Ford had fewer assets than GM, and suffered a near-death experience with a loss of $12.7 billion in 2006. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6298463.stm They caught a lucky break, in that they ran into their problems before the credit markets froze up in 2008. So they were able to mortgage themselves to the gills and obtain $18 billion in financing http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=29921 to execute a turnaround.

      > Two specific automakers were poorly managed and operated,
      > *AND WHEN THE ECONOMY TANKED*, they couldn't survive.

      Correction. when the economy tanked, they couldn't get financing to execute a turnaround, and had to get financing from US and Canadian governments, on those governments' terms. I will grant that Ford did their restructuring right, but they did get lucky in that they were forced to do so before the economy tanked, and it was still possible to borrow $18 billion.

      Credit where credit is due; Wkipedia page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Motor_Company with lots of citations.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    18. Re:Samsung wasn't the only one... by Zanadou · · Score: 1

      Gold Star had such a bad reputation that they changed their name to LG which stands for Lucky Gold Star.

      Nice try, but fail: the name "LG" was simply chosen as the final result of a merger between two companies, "Lucky" (now LG Chem) and "GoldStar" (now LG Electronics).

  13. Common phenomenon by GODISNOWHERE · · Score: 2

    The thing that's amazing is these are huge companies, and they have a lot of power, but in the United States nobody has heard of them and they're having trouble gaining traction, but it's not impossible

    Change "United States" to "China", and you've just described Google's problems when they attempted to expand several years ago. Baidu is still the number one search provider in China. There are plenty more examples of this. It's not easy to predict when a product will find traction in a foreign market.

    1. Re:Common phenomenon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying US cellular networks should downgrade connections from Chinese phones, make them lose connection from time to time, hack into the cellphone accounts of social critics who happen to use Chinese phones, maybe even accuse Chinese phones of allowing children to find porn, and iPhones will grow to be the number one phone in America?

  14. What? by Is0m0rph · · Score: 1

    People have never heard of ZTE and Huawei? http://www.mycricket.com/cell-phones/by/zte http://www.mycricket.com/sitesearch?site=all+mycricket.com&q=Huawei+ Cricket sells them both in the US.

    1. Re:What? by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Yes that sentence in the summary seemed weird. They may be newish in the ~smartphone~ market but they've been selling 3G/4G USB dongles (ZTE, though often re-branded by the telco selling them) and mobile phone infrastructure (Huawei, towers, relays, routers and the like) for a long time, including in Western countries.

      Take a look at any dongles or pocket wifi things you've got floating around. There's a good chance it's actually a ZTE device.

  15. Chinese Firms Face Hurdle Japanese & Koreans D by Koreantoast · · Score: 2

    Chinese firms like Huawei face an additional, very complicated hurdle that Japanese and Koreans firms didn't face when they worked their way into the American market, the "taint" that's left on their brands by the Chinese government. When Japanese and Korean firms first came into the US, they "only" had to deal with name brand recognition, quality, etc. While there was some hysteria around Japan Inc. and whatnot buying the US, I would suggest that Chinese concerns are probably even greater, magnified by concerns of military espionage and a messy history between the two nations from 1949 to today. It's not fair, but it's unfortunately a real thing they have to deal with. Thus, they have just that one extra headache they have to deal with, not just convincing that their products are competitive but that they're not out to steal your data and wage war with the United States as well.

    I would also add that unlike Japan, they face much stiffer competition entering into the US market with a larger number of well established, well funded players who unlike blindsided American firms, much better understand how the electronics-export game works.

  16. Invasion Begins? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    I bought my kids Huwaei Ascend android smartphones several years ago (2010). This so called "invasion" started years ago. If you can even call it that, since I'm pretty sure all smartphones are made in China, aren't they?

  17. Re:You can get non-chinese phones? Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I'm sure apple employs only american expats in its Chinese factories.

  18. Re:You can get non-chinese phones? Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well then instead of abusing him you could just prove you are not a racist prick by just providing citations that show all these hardware devices and phones from china that ship with malware.

  19. Lenovo ThinkPhones, anyone . . . ? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

    Straight from this week's The Economist, http://www.economist.com/news/business/21569398-how-did-lenovo-become-worlds-biggest-computer-company-guard-shack-global-giant

    Lenovo is on a roll. It is number one in five of the seven biggest PC markets, including Japan and Germany. Its mobile division is poised to leapfrog Samsung to grab the top spot in China, the world’s biggest smartphone market. This week it made a splash at the International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas with what PC World called “bullish bravado and a seemingly bottomless trunk” of enticing new products.

    To focus on PCs, Mr Yang’s [CEO] predecessor sold Lenovo’s smartphone arm for $100m in 2008. Mr Yang bought it back for twice as much the next year. He believes that PCs and other devices will converge, so knowledge of one area will breed expertise in the other. He may be right. Smartphone sales are red hot in China, and Lenovo is now selling mobiles and tablets in several emerging markets

    He also thinks Lenovo has a secret weapon. It has kept a lot of manufacturing in-house (why outsource to Foxconn when you already pay Chinese wages?). Mr Yang believes this in-house expertise gives his firm an edge in product development. But Lenovo must exploit that edge better than it has done so far if it is to compete with a technology powerhouse like Samsung and build a global brand anything like Apple’s.

    Has anyone seen one of these Lenovo phone critters yet . . . ?

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Lenovo ThinkPhones, anyone . . . ? by twokay · · Score: 1

      No, but their laptops do my head in -- their ThinkPad branded ones at least. The hardware is actually very nice, apart from one key component, the track-pad.

      A couple of years ago they went from a usable regular track-pad with two physical mouse buttons, to a mutant Macbook ripoff that has the buttons a part of the touch sensitive surface. This makes using two fingers -- one to swipe the other to click -- an exercise in frustration as your clicking finger also registers as movement and the cursor jumps about.

      I also had a lot of trouble right clicking, i don't remember why but i had pretty much given up at that point and plugged in a USB mouse. I guess this could be fixed with some decent touchpad software/drivers, but out of the box is is a nightmare.

      Also they load epic amounts of Lenovo (and other) branded crapware. I'm pretty sure as you go up their price range this increases, as it adds an extra feature bullet point on the spec sheet. 90% gets immediately uninstalled if i am anywhere near it. They also don't ship any recovery discs (i guess this it not too unusual now) and force you to burn your own if you want something else other than the recovery partition. Due to the amount of extra software this took 40 mins and 3 DVDs!

      Finally there is no means to create a vanilla Windows restore disc, so you have waste more time adding the correct SLIC cert files to a custom DVD image to get it to activate a vanilla Windows install, if you want to purge all trace of pre-installed software.

      The only good thing is i learnt this without me or my family having bought one, they were all company purchases.

      --
      Wannabe nerd.
  20. Re:Chinese Firms Face Hurdle Japanese & Korean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WW2 and the Korean Wars created an indelible prejudice against Japanese and Korean manufactured goods across an entire generation of Americans.

    You are just too young to have had a meaningful conversation with anyone from that generation.

  21. Re:You can get non-chinese phones? Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That didn't make any sense.

  22. Enjoying arguing with your straw-man? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You seem to be arguing with someone that doesn't exist in this thread. I've seen nobody say "China can never make quality hardware." What people are saying is that they will need to make quality hardware, before they'll gain much in the way of US marketshare. Many of us have noticed that goods developed and branded by Chinese companies tend to be cheap at the expense of all quality. That will be a problem in the smartphone market most likely.

    I'm quite sure China can produce quality goods, because I own some of them. I've goods that were produced in China, to the spec of a foreign company that are quite high quality. However that does not mean that the goods their domestic companies are choosing to produce are high quality.

    Also your whining about complacency and bringing down empires shows a real lack of awareness of the US and the world. For one, you can hardly call the US complacent. Lots of top notch R&D happens in the US, lots of top notch manufacturing. A simple example would be the CPU most likely in your PC: Intel. They have the most advanced fabs in the world, and ruthlessly push the technology curve ahead. And yes, they manufacture in the US dominantly (8 of 11 fabs).

    What's more there's nothing to "bring down". The US is a nation, not an empire and guess what? The US doesn't have to be #1 at everything to still be a nice place to live. I've been to a number of countries, all of them by definition not #1 at all the things the US is, and they were all quite nice. Canada, Norway, the UK, all places I would be very happy to live. They don't get to claim many "#1s" but they don't have to. It isn't a situation of "Someone is the best and everyone else sucks."

    There is room in the world for a successful China AND US, just as there is room for a successful UK, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Taiwan, and so on.

    1. Re:Enjoying arguing with your straw-man? by bmo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've seen nobody say "China can never make quality hardware."

      Oh look.

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3376583&cid=42562759

      Even modded insightful.

      --
      BMO

  23. Back door man! by CHIT2ME · · Score: 0

    With all the back doors the Chinese install in the electronics sold in the U.S., would you really want those naked pics of your girlfriend being oogled by some middle-aged Chinese security agent pervert?

    --
    My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
    1. Re:Back door man! by Kplx138 · · Score: 1

      as opposed to all the backdoors every other government installs in their electronics.
      I remember a while back there was scare-mongering over huawei telecom components because huawei had close ties
      to the chinese goverment and therefore comprised, I also realized that they
      (huawei) were probably in bed with the chinese government beause the chinese govt. wanted telecom infrastructure that they
      knew weren't riddled with american govt. backdoors.

    2. Re:Back door man! by CHIT2ME · · Score: 1

      Better U.S., British, French, German, Italian, etc., etc., etc., Than Chinese! Remember, China is still a Communist dictatorship bent on world domination. When the shortsighted international corporations degrade the wages and buying power of the number one consumer nation in the world (U.S.), When U.S. consumers can no longer afford Chinese imports or any other imports we will see the Chinese industrial base implode. Guess who they will blame....us!!! Then the sh*t will hit the fan!

      --
      My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
    3. Re:Back door man! by Kplx138 · · Score: 1

      British colonialism, French colonialism, German and Italian fascists... And the Americans are still under debate none of these countries have clean slates

  24. ZTE Nubia-Z5 by gitano_dbs · · Score: 3, Informative

    They are not only cheap models, ZTE its releasing this http://www.phonearena.com/phones/ZTE-Nubia-Z5_id7609 this month. Quadcore processor at 1500 MHz, 5 inches display on 1920 x 1080 pixels and 441 ppi.

  25. The article quotes Jeff Lotman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work for Lotman. He's a prick.

  26. I got a cheap modern samsung phone by Nyder · · Score: 1

    the phone is so cheap, I can NOT change the ringtone.

    I see it used on TV as a "throw away" phone quite often.

    Samsung is still making cheap shit that no one wants, they just raised the price on their stuff so you think it's not a cheap piece of shit.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  27. They are using stolen tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a couple of connections at a major cell manufacturer. They have been having issues with attacks coming in and stealing all their IP. From which country? You've got it, China.

    My sources say that Huawei released a phone last year that contained a firmware bug identical to a phone released slightly later.

    Anyone that's in security will tell you how many attacks originate not just in China, but from Chinese government/educational/military institutions. Some will also tell you the relationship that ZTE and Huawei have with the Chinese government.

    This should come as no surprise since these attacks from China ramped up after manufacturers refused to turn over trade secrets some years back to the government in exchange for manufacturing stuff there on the cheap.

  28. Phablet by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

    "You can get a voice/data plan for about $30 a month. But you're not going to want to use it with a smart phone."

    And why not? I've seen "smart" people use their smartphones as a combo dumbphone/tablet, effectively turning them into small "phablets" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phablet). Basically you use the expensive data plan for the dumbphone stuff like old-fashioned text-messaging and voice calls, or for quickly checking your social stats. Then you report to the nearest wi-fi hotspot if you want to watch YouTube or stare at your FB profile. This isn't as much as a hassle as you think, if you happen to live in a big city. Incidentally the Chinaphones I've seen happen to have 5" screen, which puts them at the lower end of the phablet category.

    1. Re: Phablet by herojig · · Score: 1

      I'm using my Galaxy Note 2 as a desktop computer in the den, and if there were a cheaper chinese version with like specs, I'd put one in every room that has a HDMI monitor sitting idly by - but what I gather from this experiment is that Apple needs to build in telephony to all its computers, or I'm going to replace my MBs and Airs with cheaper phones, and use android devices for everything but 'real' work.

      --
      I think therefore I can't be ~TTNH
  29. Re:You can get non-chinese phones? Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Nokia N8 was made in Mexico.

    Hey, at least it's Made in North America!

    Unfortunately, it runs Symbian.

  30. Hardware and plans, separate? by DavidClarkeHR · · Score: 1

    Some of us buy our hardware and our plans separately.

    If you do differently, well, that's your own problem.

    The economic feasibility of that suggestion varies greatly depending on your particular geography, sir.

    --
    - Nec Impar Pluribus, or so I'm told.
  31. Many still consider LG a junk brand by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    Particularly their software has been half baked for android.

    The only reason we don't notice it this round is their Nexus 4 had a Quad Core A15 and 2GB RAM. Nothing can slow IT down...just drain the battery.

    1. Re:Many still consider LG a junk brand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They manufacture a larger volume of LCD panels than anyone (save Samsung?), and their home appliances are apparently pretty good. So uh, they have shitty Android software?

    2. Re:Many still consider LG a junk brand by Pale+Dot · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken, LG and Sony were the two big consumer electronics companies that Apple dared not sue because they built phones or hardware prototypes that predated the classic iPhone design, e.g. the LG Prada (announced Dec 2006). Maybe it's become an also-ran like Nokia in the face of the Apple-Samsung juggernaut, but LG's definitely not a junk brand. (I'm not saying Apple ripped off the LG design, only that LG had a design team competent enough to independently produce something that came close to the iPhone ideal.)

  32. Chinkphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinkphone for cunt. You buy chinkphone you be cunt. Chinky fuck America round eye. Cheap shit throw away we get money.

  33. Re:ZTE Nubia-Z5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it really lack autofocus and gps though?

  34. So what changed about Samsung? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I owned a Galaxy Spica... i have to thank Samsung for convincing me to switch to an iPhone.
    In their defense, my 4-5 years old Samsung "dumb" TV is still perfectly fine. I guess they only fail at "smart" products.

  35. Re:I own a ZTE v875 by bedouin · · Score: 2

    Particles of dust inside the LCD and opening it up periodically is an experience most people do not want to endure, alongside an outdated OS and fragile connections. You got what you paid for, which is fine for you but not many others who want a phone that 'just works.'

  36. Re:You can get non-chinese phones? Where? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    I happen to read International Standard English, so please allow me to translate.

    "I ain't never heared o' no Chinese hardly-wear with that there mallard-wear on it. Show me some o' that there Chinese hardly-wear with that there mallard-ware on hit, or git raht off mah pond!"

    HTH u dood.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  37. 6 months? by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

    Why do you assume that it would just last 6 months? They last a good deal longer.
    20-30$ a month is small money in a wester country,but in developing countries, its a lot more.

    Let me tell you the India story.
    A few years back, when the telecom boom happened, you needed to buy your own phone. Even today very few carriers offer bundles
    So you could either spend 150$ approx to buy a nokia feature phone(entry level), or some 300$ to get a more advanced feature phone, and about 600$ to buy a newish smartphone.

    Or you could buy a chinese feature phone with no name brand for 100$ which used ot do some web browsing and stuff.
    As the advanced smartphones came, LG, samsung etc., found their main market was 10000-15000 INR range. Which is approx 200-300$

    The chinese phones were 6000-7000.
    Then a few companies decided why not get the "better chinese" phones and rebrand them and offer warranty and stuff. So domestic companies like karbonn and Micromax bloomed.
    Cannot afford that 400$ 1.2GZ dual core with 1GB ram
    Well there is a dual core with 1GB of ram for 11999 INR (220$) with 1 year warranty.
    And as anybody who has worked in electronics will tell you, if it lasts a year, it will last a few more.

    The US market is pretty new, but once you have a similar specied phone on contract for half the price, people will take it, because after a year they usually trade in their phones for a newer model.

    Another point to note here is that these phones are not junk. If samsung has a 1 in 100 failure rate these guys have around 1 in 60 or 1 in 70. As long as the supplier factors this into the equation and offers customer service, there are not going to be any issues.

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  38. the whole post is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most don't show off phones at CES
    that's what MWC is for

  39. Re:I own a ZTE v875 by miknix · · Score: 1

    Hey, don't get me wrong, the phone just works (TM).

    Particles of dust inside the LCD and opening it up periodically is an experience most people do not want to endure

    I said I opened it a couple of times... which means.. around two times, not often as you make it sound. The first time was just to inspect the SoC, the second to remove the dust.

    and fragile connections

    Did you ever seen an LCD flex cable? Yes it is fragile, not just this particular one - specially if you try to pull it using a string (bad idea). So yeah, I broke it and it was my fault. I just wrote the little incident to make people laugh, not to make the phone look bad.

    alongside an outdated OS

    Yes, the OS is outdated. But do you care explaining me what functionality do latest Android provides that I don't have in gingerbread? I never felt I was missing anything compared to my friends owning higher end models - just a different UI. Gingerbread is actually very stable and fast (I just remember it freezing the UI one time), it allows me to use all Google services. I'm also playing Ingress like some of my friends and I have angry birds installed. The only thing I could not do so far was .. install Chrome, but why would I want Chrome in my phone when the default webkit browser works just fine? (oh and btw, I cannot install it because chrome is compiled for a slightly different instruction set - so, not a gingerbread problem anyway).

    You got what you paid for, which is fine for you but not many others who want a phone that 'just works.'

    Well, my phone 'just works'. If one day it stops doing it, I can buy it again a couple more times before meeting the price of a higher end model.

  40. surprise by erdraug · · Score: 2

    If every big company outsources their production facilities to China, what do you expect to happen? Chinese manufacturers will sit on the know-how idly, without taking advantage of it? Of course they'll start manufacturing their own products after a while.

    Smartphones, cars, air-conditioners, fridges, ships, armament, you name it. It's inevitable.

  41. Re:I own a ZTE v875 by miknix · · Score: 1

    I completely failed to mention I own the referred phone for more than 1 year!

  42. wholesale leggings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good post and straight to the point. I am not sure if this is really the best place to ask but do you people have any ideea where to get some professional writers? wholesale sunglasses

  43. A truly disposable phone but the 'activation fee!; by gelfling · · Score: 1

    A $5 phone that lasts about 3 months and then I can bring it in get another one. The key problem isn't the phone it's the 'activation fees' they charge. The upside though is that finally Sprint would get a garbage phone as terrible as their service.

  44. Unless US cellphone companies support them... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    ...on a large scale, don't expect Huawei and ZTE to be influential in the US market.

    Right now, the "Big Four" of cellphone companies with US operations (AT&T, Verizon, Sprint and T-Mobile USA) are mostly pushing well-known brands of cellphones from the likes of Apple, HTC, LG, Motorola and Samsung. As such, these five cellphone companies have nearly all of the market share (though Nokia is starting to make a comeback with their Windows Phone 8 based Lumia models), and new companies like Huawei and ZTE may find it very hard to become players in the US market.

  45. What the heck is a "Chinese Smart Phone?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get it!

    My Apple iPhone 4S is made in China.

    My Samsung Galaxy S3 and Samsung Galaxy Note 2 are made in China.

    My HTC One X is made in China.

    I don't understand the phrase "Chinese Smart Phone." I thought all smart phones are CHINESE SMART PHONES, with different tags (Apple, Samsung, HTC, etc).

  46. Deja pu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just as the British dismissed the utilitarian products of early American industrialisation during the 1851 Exhibition in London.

  47. Sigh, can't we just shoot the stupid like Lumpy by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Morons like Lumpy just don't get and never will. Samsung made crappy stuff and then they got better. Sony used to make crappy stuff and then they got better AND then they went wallstreet and went crap and all their engineers went to Samsung with a big paycheck and layoff package. And Americans made crappy stuff nobody wanted except cheap grain and meat and then they got better and destroyed British industry.

    You start producing crap and cheap clones while learning from doing the assembly of others and then you take over. It happened a LOT of times already and every single time it happens a braindead moron like Lumpy says "I don't want cheap crappy (Chinese/Korean/Japanese/Americas) knockoff's not in my lifetime." And then the world changes and Lumpy is put in a retirement home were his family prays for his dead.

    Those who have no braincells never learn from history and are doomed to repeat the same lines while totally oblivious to the real world around them. I know it is not as snappy as the original saying but it is more accurate. Some people never ever learn anything at all ever.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Sigh, can't we just shoot the stupid like Lumpy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dip-shit loud mouths without any brains like you will make noise because they think they are experts but never will learn that most everyone thinks they are idiots.

      Mostly because of how you present yourself. You are one of the stupidest people here on Slashdot, You do realize that you have been a laughingstock here for a while? right?

  48. Not just since WW2 by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    This has gone on LONG before. Do you think it is new for imports to replace local production? It has been going on for literally centuries, no for thousands of years.

    2000-3000 years ago people already were massive traders with goods from the north of Europe and the middle east ending up in Switzerland.

    The US itself was once nothing more then a little upstart colony but with the changing tech (freezing) it changed British farming forever. Same with the prison colony Australia. Nowadays, south american steak is considered to be of high quality... it was once considered crap but cheap. Same with US corn-fed beef, if you were posh you bought local, only the poor did increase their intake of meat by buying frozen imports. And then it changed.

    Dig for Britain during WW2 had at its roots the British belief they could outsource ALL their food production to its colonies. Then shit happened and Britain had to go back to sustenance farming to feed itself. It really is little different from the US being dependant on Chinese products, military, tech and keeping the people happy with cheap stuff. The US is a sold out Walmart away from revolution. And before China, the cheap stuff came from Korea and before that from Japan. And Britian NEEDED, was totally depended on US food and even industry, the country that invented modern agri-culture and the industrial revolution.

    We sometimes like to think that we in our times life in an age of global travel but while Magellan famously did NOT travel around the world, his crew did. Ordinary people totally forgotten by history. How many times have you traveled around the world?

    REMEMBER where the printing press, CAME from. FROM China. A Chinese import, centuries ago. It was a case of parallel invention, the tech was literally exported from China and imported into Europe. And around it trade in countless goods took place. You may think you are being a bit hip eating foreign foods but Curry has been a staple part of british diet for a LONG time when the locals barely moved beyond their village but were eating food from across the world, mutton from Australia, rice from China. Whenever an ancient ship is found its cargo turns out to be industrial scale goods trafficked between nations long before we tend to think a global economy could have existed.

    People have always traded and it has long been clear that even before the romans, in western Europes, goods travelled throughout all of Europe and as trade increased, societies came to depend on the trade. And if trade was really good, a local producer could easily see itself being replaced. England is really one of the core examples of this, its agri-culture had to adapt to massive changes and its industry sadly never did. It is a lesson the world would do well to study and do it for more then "latest asian tiger to produce cheap knockoffs". The US itself was once a knockoff place. Hell, the west itself was to Japan and China centuries ago, sources of cheap goods.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Not just since WW2 by bmo · · Score: 1

      I can't argue with anything you've said.

      I was just writing from the perspective of a resident of the US since WWII and a witness to rampant American Exceptionalism philosophy in my 47 years on this planet.

      Of course if you want to look at the larger picture, yes, there is no actual race out there that is special and that success is always contingent on current circumstances (resources, ambition, etc), which is why I mentioned Jared Diamond's book, "Guns, Germs, and Steel," That book is actually an excellent read and doesn't seem as long or difficult as the physical dimensions of the book seem to indicate.

      Imagine, if you will, Rome not becoming top-heavy with administration and complacent, what that might have implied for whether it would collapse or not. Imagine China not retreating and becoming insular after its Zeng He's great trading ships plied the seas. Imagine the Chinese reaching North America 100 years before Columbus.

      The US itself was once a knockoff place.

      I grew up in Rhode Island, and I was just across the river from Slater's Mill last week.

      --
      BMO

  49. Lack of introspection should be painful by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Samsung is still making cheap shit that no one wants

    VS

    I got a cheap modern samsung phone

    No one wants it, he bought it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  50. So, what you're really saying is... by sgtrock · · Score: 1

    ...that for you, the cost of a smartphone is a very small portion of the overall cost of service because you want far more data per month than many people do. From what I've seen here and elsewhere, you are an outlier. That's fine. There are data plans for you.

    For the rest of us, there are far cheaper plans that provide us with what we need, so the cost of a smartphone becomes a significant fraction of the overall cost of service. That's why cheap Android phones are taking off in almost every market where they are introduced.

  51. Re:ZTE Nubia-Z5 by gitano_dbs · · Score: 1

    reading at their mini site http://www.nubia.cn/nubia.html got autofocus for sure but no clue abouth gps.

  52. Re:You can get non-chinese phones? Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You happen to be incredibly stupid too. Why're we forced to listen to this babbling idiot?

  53. Re:You can get non-chinese phones? Where? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    If you weren't such a chickenshit, you could actually log in and use your account's Awesome Choco-licious Karma Qi Power to downmod me straight to Hell.

    Right? Right!

    So what's stopping you?

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.