Slashdot Mirror


The Best and Worst From CES 2013

CowboyRobot writes "InformationWeek has collected what it considers to be the five dumbest ideas presented at this year's CES. The list includes: 'The HapiFork is an electronic fork that tracks how many mouthfuls of food you consume during a given meal, how many seconds pass between bites, and how long the meal took to complete.' Also on the list is the iPotty, which is about what you would guess from the name. And for balance, the list of the seven standout technologies includes 3M's 84-inch touchscreen display and Parrot's $300 'AR Drone 2.0, a gravity-defying spectacle that puts yesteryear's remote-control helicopters to shame with its ability to dive, spin and whirl through the air.'"

152 comments

  1. Silly names... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    The first think I imagined when I read "HapiFork" was, well, Hapi. You don't want to imagine *that*. (The other Hapi isn't necessarily a better association either, and I won't even talk about the third one.)

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:Silly names... by Skiboy941 · · Score: 5, Funny

      From wikipedia: "He is typically depicted as a man with a large belly wearing a loincloth, having long hair and having pendulous, female-like breasts." So the fork is to prevent you from getting fat and getting man-titties?

    2. Re:Silly names... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From wikipedia: "He is typically depicted as a man with a large belly wearing a loincloth, having long hair and having pendulous, female-like breasts."

      So the fork is to prevent you from getting fat and getting man-titties?

      The description sounds like your average american slashdotter at 30.

      Or 20.

  2. The 4K tablet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    That 20 inch tablet is NOT one of the worst, its presence on that list really reduces the credibility of the list.

    It's not one of the best either, but it being mentioned alongside the 'HapiFork' is disgraceful.

    1. Re:The 4K tablet. by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm a little confused by the list to be honest. Apparently a novel food tracking device to help dieting is a terrible idea, but an 84" tablet is way cool and a huge advance for everyone.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:The 4K tablet. by vlm · · Score: 2

      The "worst" part is you make a giant glass cockpit device and FAA/DOT/USCG/Area51 won't approve it for vehicular use, so you stick a battery in it and call it a tablet.

      The first thing I thought of was Steve Jobs yacht or whomever it was, where the whole boat was run by computers. A waterproofed marine version would of course quintuple the price but would make a pretty awesome UI if you installed 3 or more in a boat (3 or more identical ones, so when you crack screen #2 you can bring the weather radar up on screen #7 instead or whatever)

      Would make a great component for a project artemis bridge, too, if you can buy about six of them and mount them to plywood somehow.

      http://www.artemis.eochu.com/

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:The 4K tablet. by Tx · · Score: 2

      Agreed. It's obviously not meant to be used in the same way as an iPad or Nexus 7, as the author's comments seem to imply that he thinks (" it's way too big to easily handle" - duh), it's more a portable 20" all-in-one PC. I can think of uses for a 20" 4k tablet, whereas beyond "does it blend?" I'm coming up blank with the HapiFork.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    4. Re:The 4K tablet. by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

      I actually was pretty excited about the prospects of a 20" tablet. It'd make a great "control panel" for my home.

    5. Re:The 4K tablet. by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 5, Funny

      But that's bigger than the iPad! Nothing can be different than what Apple does, that is the surest sign of failure. I mean, look what happend to 7" tablets. They did not succeed until Apple made one.

    6. Re:The 4K tablet. by ranton · · Score: 1

      I just heard about this 4K tablet, and it is the one technology on either the 'good' or 'bad' list that has me excited. I haven't found an estimated price, but if they can make a 20" tablet with 4K resolution for around $2k then there may be hope for a 30"+ monitor with 4K resolution someday. I would buy a monitor like that for $1999 immediately.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    7. Re:The 4K tablet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a little confused by the list to be honest. Apparently a novel food tracking device to help dieting is a terrible idea, but an 84" tablet is way cool and a huge advance for everyone.

      In other news, american life expectancy lags behind.

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2240855/How-does-nation-rank-world-map-life-expectancy.html
      http://www.webmd.com/healthy-aging/news/20110614/us-life-expectancy-lags-behind
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2182305/American-life-expectancy-Graphic-reveals-alarming-differences-death-rates-states.html
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2206708/Life-expectancy-poor-white-Americans-drops-sharply-increases-blacks-Latinos.html

    8. Re:The 4K tablet. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

      I just want to know when they will invent pockets on a normal pair of blue jeans large enough to comfortably hold these giant phones.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    9. Re:The 4K tablet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Doesn't sound like a fail to me either. Rather it's geared to a specific market.

      Sounds to me given the size and high resolution like a device very well suited to become a portable variant of the Wacom Cintiq. (Provided it can support and be integrated with that Wacom transponder stylus tech.) If it has enough computing power to work the latest Adobe Creative Suite software, all the better. (Which would make sense if it's Windows 8.) Some professional artist types would really like a device that lets them do their digital painting, illustration, and presentation planning work while not tied to a desk.

    10. Re:The 4K tablet. by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I started off with the "standout items" list.

      Number 1 - gigantic tablet. Nothing standout or breakthrough, just quite large version of existing stuff, vague assertions that "it might be sort of useful in the enterprise?". They couldn't even think why it might be useful.

      Number 2 - LG has lots of cool television enhancements on the way such as improved interfaces and voice command response. But they didn't show that. Just a rather big screen that's too expensive for anyone to buy.

      Number 3 - a little hovering thing. Nothing new, nothing improved, except it's got extended battery life.

      I gave up at this point.

    11. Re:The 4K tablet. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I just want to know when they will invent pockets on a normal pair of blue jeans large enough to comfortably hold these giant phones.

      You sound like one of those repulsive luddite enemies of progress who don't have their phone(or, 'phablet', to us cool kids) out and in use 100% of the time...

    12. Re:The 4K tablet. by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Only a pick-pocket would want a tablet pocketed.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    13. Re:The 4K tablet. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      I'm coming up blank with the HapiFork.

      Perhaps you are not in the target market. I was a skinny kid in a large family, and learned early to wolf my food down quickly before someone else grabbed it. When I hit age forty, I started to put on a few pounds. One of the things I did to lose those pounds was slow down and pace my eating, so that the hunger would fade before I was already stuffed. But it was difficult to break a lifetime habit of eating quickly, and something like HapiFork may have helped.

      We have a major obesity problem in this country, and it is spreading worldwide. If HapiFork can help a few people, and be a small part of the solution, then we should not be so quick to ridicule it.

    14. Re:The 4K tablet. by AuMatar · · Score: 2

      Or someone who doesn't carry a backpack/purse/briefcase. If it doesn't fit in my pocket, it may as well be a desktop- I'm not taking it anywhere.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    15. Re:The 4K tablet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      american life expectancy stuff

      Boy, you are rather behind aren't you? Even slashdot of all places beat you to it.

    16. Re:The 4K tablet. by GreatDrok · · Score: 1

      "But that's bigger than the iPad! Nothing can be different than what Apple does, that is the surest sign of failure. I mean, look what happend to 7" tablets. They did not succeed until Apple made one."

      Apple made an 8" tablet, not 7". We've got a Nexus 7 in the office and it has a substantially smaller screen because it has a 16:9 aspect 7" screen whereas the iPad mini is a 4:3 aspect 8" screen.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    17. Re:The 4K tablet. by thisisfutile · · Score: 0

      THIS! While I'm not from a large family, I too inhaled my food my entire life. I'm 41, have been steadily gaining wait for several years and even though I'm concerned about the weight, I know I can start activity to handle that and it's working. The thing that's always worried me was the affects of eating too fast on the digestive system. Even though I'm regular now, I hate the thought of things giving out just because a lifelong habit of eating too fast. I see a hapifork in my future (after it flops and comes down from it's $100 price of course).

    18. Re:The 4K tablet. by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Apple's 7" tablet is an 8" tablet, so, it's... better. And Tim Cook made sure to point this out at the introduction of the iPad Mini. I shit you not.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    19. Re:The 4K tablet. by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      Does it definitely, definitely have a smaller screen?

    20. Re:The 4K tablet. by hvdh · · Score: 1

      While I have no need for a 20inch 4K tablet, I'm very interested in an affordable monitor based on that panel. Even more if they made it a bit larger, say 24".

    21. Re:The 4K tablet. by David_Hart · · Score: 2

      I'm coming up blank with the HapiFork.

      Perhaps you are not in the target market. I was a skinny kid in a large family, and learned early to wolf my food down quickly before someone else grabbed it. When I hit age forty, I started to put on a few pounds. One of the things I did to lose those pounds was slow down and pace my eating, so that the hunger would fade before I was already stuffed. But it was difficult to break a lifetime habit of eating quickly, and something like HapiFork may have helped.

      We have a major obesity problem in this country, and it is spreading worldwide. If HapiFork can help a few people, and be a small part of the solution, then we should not be so quick to ridicule it.

      I ate fast as a kid too. Not because we were competing for food, but because there was always something more interesting that I wanted to do. I still do. I never went back for seconds, though, just ate the relatively normal portions on my plate. Today, I could stand to lose some weight as well. However, that has little to do with eating fast. It's due more to sitting behind a keyboard all day instead of running out to play baseball with my friends... Anyone want to throw a baseball around? (grin)

    22. Re:The 4K tablet. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That, and I have a 7" tablet. It's too small because it's widescreen. The iPad Mini feels square compared to everyone else's 7", much more real estate for the same diagonal.

  3. CES is to Electronics Pros as by retroworks · · Score: 0

    Christmas is to Christians and Earth Day is to Environmentalists.

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:CES is to Electronics Pros as by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Christmas is to Christians and Earth Day is to Environmentalists.

      Over-commercialised, bereft of its original meaning, and just a big pain in the arse for the rest of us?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:CES is to Electronics Pros as by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      Bereft of its original meaning? You're obviously referring to celebrating the god Saturn which the christians perverted into the current mess.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    3. Re:CES is to Electronics Pros as by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Bereft of it's original meaning?

      Christmas derives from yuletide (the puritans wanted to disband Christmas), and such celebrations are common in civilisations from high latitude. It's basically a "long winters are miserable let's have some fun" celebration in essence. Generally such a celebration had the religiosity du jour wrapped around it.

      I think Christmas is pretty much spot on to its original meaning.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  4. According to whom? by Barryke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some things, like the 20" tablet are ideal for some situations. Just about anywhere a wacom monitor is used on the road, for example.

    Back in the days i have seen artists lug around with bulky CRT's because they where the only thing that had both high resolution and proper pen support.

    I just hope the MS Surface Pro has touch sensitive pen, and it'll be done. If only it where 18" and had a resolution of 2560x1400! All todays modern devices are made for mice and Chinese fingers.. I'm 2 meters tall for crying out loud i don't mind carrying anything not wider than me. With a fullsize keyboard if possible.

    Its all relative. What sucks for the author, may be the ideal product for others.

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
    1. Re:According to whom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I just hope the MS Surface Pro has touch sensitive pen, and it'll be done.

      It has one. It looks pretty interesting. I might pick one up if the price tag comes in under four figures.

    2. Re:According to whom? by Korruptionen · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen or used a large laptop? :D

    3. Re:According to whom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For *some* situations maybe. I used to lug around an 18inch laptop. PAIN FULL (was a good idea when I bought it). Heavy, bulky, and a pain to wave around (bet the 20 inch one weighs at least 4 pounds prob more like 6-8 for glass and battery). Which means you have to stand it up somewhere, or find a good spot to lay it out (and remember its decently big). Also good luck finding a bag for a 20 inch screen. All the bags out there are made for 17 or lower unless you custom order or dig around on the internet. Also hope you do not mind not using it on a plane. Most coach seats you are lucky to get enough room for a 17 inch laptop.

      16-17 is the sweet spot for portability. Now just find me a decent laptop (not apple) with 1400 rows...

    4. Re:According to whom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that tablet's not going to be very successful unless they bump up the specs because I'm not sure how well it will do with illustrator, photoshop and lightroom with those specs.

    5. Re:According to whom? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      I think the large tablet is cool if was a smaller and cheaper implementation of Microsoft's surface technology (not their new tablets, the older touch UI). I think carrying a 20" tablet around is a bit much and prone to have a very small market.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    6. Re:According to whom? by Barryke · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you/i call large.
      My current laptop is a 15" Acer TravelMate 6003LMi from 2004. It has an 1400x1050 resolution. (yes its 9 years old)
      My desktop workspace always consists of two 17" monitors. Thats ~30" with 2560x1024 pixel resolution.

      Anything below 14" i consider small. 14 upto 16" i consider normal. 17" and up, thats what i call large.
      I have seen and used plenty of 17" laptops, which i find decent sized but the problem always is these come with ultra low resolutions (mostly 1280x720).

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    7. Re:According to whom? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Unless the software is capable of telling the difference between a hand and a pen, I don't see it matters whether it has or not.

  5. oh good... by phil_aychio · · Score: 3, Funny

    my USB-enabled smart enema bag didn't make the top 5

    --
    obvious redundancy is obvious
    1. Re:oh good... by JustOK · · Score: 1

      but in the end, it'll be useful

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:oh good... by afeeney · · Score: 1

      Glad to see you got to the bottom of it.

    3. Re:oh good... by thisisfutile · · Score: 0

      That's just a cheap plug for your product.

    4. Re:oh good... by JustOK · · Score: 1

      no shit

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    5. Re:oh good... by DeathToBill · · Score: 1

      Oh, man, this deserves so much better than it's scored.

      --
      Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
  6. The Worst? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Clearly it was the Keynote

    1. Re:The Worst? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZOMG. Have these execs been too long surrounded with yes-men that they have totally lost their contact with real world? Or perhaps they just have better dope dealers than the rest of us.

    2. Re:The Worst? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Why can't it be both?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  7. 84-inch touchscreen - the end to Gorilla Arm! by fatphil · · Score: 1

    Now it'll be Orangutang Arm instead.

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    1. Re:84-inch touchscreen - the end to Gorilla Arm! by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Do people moan and groan this much about whiteboards? That's what this is, the latest incarnation of the smartboard. So far I haven't seen any smartboards actually displace whiteboards - too laggy, not enough contrast - but maybe they'll get it right eventually.

    2. Re:84-inch touchscreen - the end to Gorilla Arm! by fatphil · · Score: 1

      I don't know about large things like that, but I do know that my favourite input device and medium is a pen on paper still.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  8. 20" 4K display is dumb now? by carlvlad · · Score: 2

    I dont get it, Why would the 20" 4K display be considered dumb? As a tablet it may not be seen as ideal to MOST of the people out there, but I'm more impressed that they managed to cram those pixels into 20" display. I'm not sure if they're the first to manufacture such hardware, but I've never seen anyone made that level of display at that small size. (not to forget as a tablet those includes the processor and the rest of the electronics.)

    1. Re:20" 4K display is dumb now? by ikaruga · · Score: 0

      I guess that is because it's not called Retina(TM) Display.

    2. Re:20" 4K display is dumb now? by Vanderhoth · · Score: 2

      The reason they listed it as "dumb" was because there's no content optimized for a 4K display, which is a "dumb" reason to have it listed on the "dumb" list.

      For the 84" 4K TV, there's no content optimized for it yet, but some how it made the good list. The distinction seems to be one is a TV so higher rez is awesome, even with out the content, the other is a tablet so higher rez is dumb, because there's no content.

      I pretty much agreed with them up to that point.

    3. Re:20" 4K display is dumb now? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Isn't it normal that displays become available before content is widely available?

      We are just getting to the point were HD is the dominant format. HDTVs have been affordable to pretty much everyone for years now. The same will happen with 4K. Once a 55"-60" unit is under $5000 then content will be more available.

    4. Re:20" 4K display is dumb now? by carlvlad · · Score: 2

      I do believe that at this early point of time, 4K (or other higher than "HD" resolution) displays would be targeted at content creators, instead of content consumers. I do freelance videography, I would love to have high density display in small size. I keep hearing the same consensus from my peers within the same field that the display market had been stagnant at atrocious "FullHD 16:9". (Yes there are a lot of professional grade displays but they are financially out of reach from us mere freelancers :) )

    5. Re:20" 4K display is dumb now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      After considerring posting a flimsy defense, I doublechecked. He mocks a "large" phone for not having a retina display, mocks a large tablet for having more resolution than a retina display, and then drools all over a touch-table.

      Conclusion: Michael Endler is not a useful author.

    6. Re:20" 4K display is dumb now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you want even higher resolution, that's going to cost even more, but you can't afford what's currently available.

      SMH.

    7. Re:20" 4K display is dumb now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both are equally stupid. The market for tech like that at this point in time is small.

    8. Re:20" 4K display is dumb now? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      I've seen the 84" LG TV in action, with a (jaw dropping) demo at 4K, but also showing regular Bluray content which gets upscaled to 4K by the TV. While obviously not as good as real 4K, the result is still pretty damn impressive;upscalers have gotten a lot better than simple bi-linear interpolation.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    9. Re:20" 4K display is dumb now? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I personally think a 4k computer is much better than a 4K TV. At least with a computer, you could play a game and it would be rendered at 4K (assuming it had enough processing power). But for a TV, there aren't any movies that you can buy at 4K, and there doesn't even exist any media to contain a 4K movie, short of hooking up computer and having the movie stored on the hard drive. Even then, the only way to obtain the hypothetical 4K movie would be to download it, which would use up quite a substantial amount of your download allowance.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    10. Re:20" 4K display is dumb now? by robsku · · Score: 1

      At least with a computer, you could play a game and it would be rendered at 4K (assuming it had enough processing power).

      ...assuming the game uses scalable vector graphics - otherwise the extra resolution may or may not benefit, but raster graphics used aren't going to get more detailed than they are...

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
  9. Standout vs Dumb by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    What is the difference?

    I don't see myself any more likely to buy the standout products than the dumb products.

    84" touch screens and $20,000 4K LCDs aren't any more likely to make it into my living room than the iPotty. In fact the iPotty is more likely.

    1. Re:Standout vs Dumb by RichMan · · Score: 1

      Next year it will be $10k. Year after $2k. Then $1k and $500.
      Year after that you will need a new TV and it will be in the living room.

      Sure very few people get what is at CES this. 5 years out it will be generally available and used.

    2. Re:Standout vs Dumb by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      It's an 84" touchscreen. Hard to see why you'd want the touchscreen in a device you typically control from several arm lengths away.

      I guess you could tie one of those capacitive styli to the end of a broom pole and use that as a remote...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:Standout vs Dumb by ddd0004 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing.
      iPhone case that had been 3D printed? Ok, the software may be good for allowing the average consumer to create a 3D model, but to create iPhone cases. That's a ridiculous product. Let's see I get to put my face on my phone and my phone won't lay flat anymore and now it's 3 times as thick and when I talk on the phone it looks like I have a parasitic twin head on the side of my face. These are all great features sign me up.

    4. Re:Standout vs Dumb by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Funny

      Capacitive nerf gun bullets for those who won't (or can't) be bothered to get up.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re:Standout vs Dumb by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Capacitive nerf gun bullets for those who won't (or can't) be bothered to get up.

      I take it all back, an 84" tablet is the most awesomeist thing ever!

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:Standout vs Dumb by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      In the case of the 85" 4K LCD screen I doubt it will be in my living room in 5 years.

      LG said that they will be selling this as 55 and 65 inch models. So the 85" isn't going to be a commercial product at all.

      Not only that, but I don't see the point of 4K at all. The human eye just can't see the difference at reasonable viewing distances.

      And then there is the question of when in OLED coming to market? Hopefully in 5 years for real.

    7. Re:Standout vs Dumb by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      It would be neat for parties. Let people control the music and such for the whole house.

      Right now my solution involves someone asking me, which takes away from party time.

    8. Re:Standout vs Dumb by azalin · · Score: 2

      Capacitive nerf gun bullets for those who won't (or can't) be bothered to get up.

      Couple that with a fancy bullet hole app and watching daytime television suddenly got interesting again.

    9. Re:Standout vs Dumb by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      It's an 84" touchscreen. Hard to see why you'd want the touchscreen in a device you typically control from several arm lengths away.

      I guess you could tie one of those capacitive styli to the end of a broom pole and use that as a remote...

      Good news everyone!

    10. Re:Standout vs Dumb by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It's an 84" touchscreen. Hard to see why you'd want the touchscreen in a device you typically control from several arm lengths away.

      I guess you could tie one of those capacitive styli to the end of a broom pole and use that as a remote...

      If it didn't cost a fucking fortune(har, har, right..) and it had software and sensors to back it; a touchscreen that big would make a cool replacement for the 'tabletop coated with maps that the brass are standing around and being dramatic' from every sci-fi and/or war movie ever....

      That's the thing: if 'touch' were free, there are probably all sorts of neat applications that you could come up with for it. As it is, though, we still don't have anything resembling a cheap, competent, and standardized "Smart Home" light switch.

    11. Re:Standout vs Dumb by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but I don't see the point of 4K at all. The human eye just can't see the difference at reasonable viewing distances.

      Maybe at a 55" screen size. As it is now, with my living room set up to allow 4-6 people to watch a TV at the same time, a 42" TV almost 8 feet away is taking up a very narrow portion of my field of view. I want an 84" TV. Or for my whole wall to be a 4K screen.

      At a movie theater, I can certainly tell the difference between 2K and 4K. The screen is huge.

    12. Re:Standout vs Dumb by crutchy · · Score: 1

      you could put it on the floor and invite some friends to play twister on it

    13. Re:Standout vs Dumb by crutchy · · Score: 1

      you can't have a facility on LV426 without the map table... else how will ripley figure out where to put the blockades?

      affirmative

      ps... i so want one of those sentry guns mwahahaha!

  10. Why didn't the second list make it onto the first? by DeathToBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, a 20" tablet is one of the five dumbest ideas at CES, but a tablet measuring seven feet is one of the standouts? Hmmm.

    Another "standout" technology is MyLink, which... well, its a wireless hands-free kit for your phone. You know, like Bluetooth, only, um, well, about the same, actually... No wait! With a button on the steering wheel! That's right! A button to activate the voice-activated features on your phone!

    Stuff all that free-culture-open-hardware-3d-printing-for-the-masses crap, you can print YOUR OWN FACE ON YOUR iPHONE CASE! And DRONES! Alright, the same drones as last year, but WITH A BIGGER BATTERY!

    That's not all, there are VPNs! VPNs for smartphones! Yes! The innovation - can you feel it yet? And did we mention bigger batteries? Bloody expensive ones, too.

    If this is the best innovation in electronics has to offer, I think I'll go find a cave and some rocks to bang together.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
  11. Re:Why didn't the second list make it onto the fir by c · · Score: 4, Funny

    If this is the best innovation in electronics has to offer, I think I'll go find a cave and some rocks to bang together.

    Be careful with that rock banging thing. If anyone hears your rocks, there's a good chance that you'll be infringing on a mobile communications patent.

    --
    Log in or piss off.
  12. Re:Why didn't the second list make it onto the fir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can understand the hatred. Around here we bang chicks instead.

  13. 80" touch screen? by Pikoro · · Score: 1

    But I have a 100" touch display in my office. I built it almost 3 years ago.

    --
    "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  14. They had pinball there as well nice to see USA by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    They had pinball there as well nice to see made in the USA stuff getting press like that.

  15. Entirely missed the market - Architects by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    Anyone who doesn't "get" the appeal of the 5lb, 20" tablet is clearly not an architect (or a related engineering discipline, like structural engineer...me). A 10" screen is too small to do almost anything on that really matters, and if you have a capacitive-only input it's doubly useless. I've tried 3-4 different styli on my iPad, only to usually give up after writing whiteboard-sized letters to accommodate the 1/4" tip diameter of the finest point reliable stylus. You can't even write a full line of text.

    And you needn't worry about us finding a case for it. We've been toting around 11x17/A3 physical pads forever. In fact, that's the preferable format for taking a set of personal-sized drawings to a meeting, also known as a 1/2 size set (1/2 of an ANSI D, or 22x34). We've got a dozen folios in the supply closet that would fit this tablet perfectly.

    This tablet, I suspect, has a wider audience or practical usability than making an imprint of your face on an iPhone cover, a $300 charger you can only get from Brookstone, or a $300 quadcopter.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Entirely missed the market - Architects by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, a market of 80,000 in the US is a great market.

      http://www.aia.org/press/AIAS077761

      At that that run rate, I'm sure the tablets won't cost more than about $50k a piece.
      At which point, the market goes down to 8,000 and the price goes up to $100k.

      See how this works? Or doesn't?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    2. Re:Entirely missed the market - Architects by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      You missed the entire engineering market that goes with them, which is several times bigger - and that's if you exclude the entire civil engineering field. It also excludes every architect who decides not to pay the AIA to be a "member." Don't forget all of the large general contractors out there doing hundreds of billions of dollars of construction projects every year who are utilizing building information modeling. Which, funny enough, is EXACTLY the market these have been made for - to the extent that one of the biggest players in the software size of technical drawing markups (Bluebeam) is working with them to make it happen.

      And that ignores the entire photography and graphics art market, where something like this would be quite useful, as Wacom is keenly aware. (though without a pressure sensitive pen, you'll lose some of them)

      The potential application extends to any field where large-format (in other words anything that uses Letter/A4 or larger pages) access to pages is necessary. That's a bit more of a stretch, but this will display two A3 pages side by side - just like a regular technical manual - in color, and with real time data connection to a local server. The KindleDX never really took off, but Amazon also never pushed it and never upgraded it because tech manuals don't sell well on Amazon.com.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:Entirely missed the market - Architects by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but wouldn't it just be easier to have a regular laptop, or really powerful 10 inch tablet that you plug into a regular screen/keyboard/mouse when you want to get work done? There's very little point in carrying around a 20 inch screen, since a 20 inch screen won't be big enough for real work anyway, and most places where you want to work will probably have a suitable screen there already. Obviously, it's nice to carry around your hard drive, so your data and applications are with you, and carry around your computer (CPU, RAM, Video card, etc) because the applications/OS don't play nice when you just attach them to a completely different computer. But there is always no reason at all to carry around a very large monitor.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Entirely missed the market - Architects by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Fine, add an extra zero to the volumes. Or even two.

      Won't make a damn bit of difference if that's your entire market.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re:Entirely missed the market - Architects by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      Does it even have to be a huge commercial success to be useful? No, wait, I'll answer for you: no, it doesn't. There are plenty of things in this world that may not be terribly useful for the general populace or huge commercial successes, yet they're definitely worth their weight in gold for their intended target-audience. You, clearly, are not a part of the target-audience here given your lack of insight.

    6. Re:Entirely missed the market - Architects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It hasn't stopped engineering targeted laptops before, so I don't know why it would stop this. And those came out quite a bit cheaper, even the old ones that had displays above what was typical in consumer devices. Maybe it helps there are other people that want portable desktops too, which is a rather different niche than large mobile computers, typically not caring much about battery life or weight. I've seen far more esoteric stuff targeted towards artist come in a lot cheaper for a lot smaller production runs.

  16. call me when there is a hover board by cod3r_ · · Score: 1

    Only 2 years left.

  17. What I don't understand... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why are all these '4k' displays being introduced as TVs, rather than marketed as monitors(possibly in slightly smaller sizes, ~36 inches, say) that just happen to have a bunch of types of video input?

    On the TV side there is zip, zero, zilch, nada, fuck-all available at that resolution. An entire ecosystem of foot-dragging broadcasters, STBs, impractically high demands for streaming, no disk format, etc. stands in the way. As a monitor? Even relatively proasic PCs should be able to drive the thing(and a video card that costs more than a couple hundred bucks can probably even keep the frame rates up) and 'retina' is all the rage these days.

    Obviously, unless they specifically break the connectors in some way contrary to spec, these "TVs" will work as monitors; but why aren't they being sold as such?

    1. Re:What I don't understand... by Tom · · Score: 1

      Refresh rates? A TV shows 24/25/29 fps, while most gamers want to have 60fps. Doubling the frame rate for a display device isn't exactly trivial.

      Note this is just a guess. I don't have a TV so I don't bother checking specs of any new ones, but this seems to be the most immediate difference.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    2. Re:What I don't understand... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The one upside of the (otherwise largely bullshit) '3D headachevision shutterglasses' nonsense is that it has substantially increased the number of TVs in the wild that can handle refresh rates twice as high as the various ATSC/NTSC oddities in order to allow a traditional framerate for each eye even when the shutter glasses are only giving each eye every-other frame.

      This doesn't necessarily apply in the cheap seats; but the '3D' fad means that you can purchase hardware in the 60-120hz range, some of which isn't even entirely lying about its abilities...

    3. Re:What I don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why are all these '4k' displays being introduced as TVs, rather than

      > ... monitors ... smaller sizes, ~36 inches, say

      What's the process for making these displays?

      I'd guess they're making the biggest sheets of display material they can, figuring out the biggest chunk that can be carved out without too many deficits, and selling that for the best price --as a rare expensive television.

      Then they carve smaller rectangles out of the remainder of the sheet, and those go to other hardware.

      More like turning individual rough diamonds into jewels than like mass production?

    4. Re:What I don't understand... by amorsen · · Score: 2

      Most TVs show 60fps quite well. Some of them pretend to go way higher, but the afterglow from LCD typically limits effective frame rate to something in the 60fps range.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    5. Re:What I don't understand... by strack · · Score: 1

      as someone who is typing this on a 120hz 3d lcd monitor, i think youll find your wrong. the actual limiting factor in the refresh rate of most hd tvs is the maximum bandwidth of the HDMI connection standard, which cant do full hd at 120 fps. my dual link dvi driven monitor does 120hz nvidia 3d vision just fine, thankyouverymuch.

    6. Re:What I don't understand... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Most 1080p+ (higher refreshes...) HDTVs I've seen have VGA and/or DVI input in addition to the HDMI. That doesn't mean they'll let you max out the connector's capabilities, though. Indeed, even if the TV has the hardware to do it, the feature is often turned off as a price differentiator. My SHARP LCD TV is 52" and yet they still turned off HDMI CEC. If only I knew how to enable it. The firmware self-test system has a test for the hardware and it seems to pass, but I don't have the feature.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  18. No Oculus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they must've missed it

  19. Which is which again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please help me...which article is which?

    I can't tell why "Collaboration surface touch screen, only bigger" is good but "Tablet touch screen, only bigger" is bad. ...or why "gaudy alligator skin phone case" is bad but "3D-printed skull phone case" is good.

    All the "good" products are either "existing thing", "existing thing but bigger", or "stupid thing". All of these products are terrible.

  20. Re:Why didn't the second list make it onto the fir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, am I on 4chan?

  21. High resolution computer screens back? Please? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2

    I realize that a lot of tech writers have forgotten what it is like to use computers, but I really miss the high-resolution monitors that we USED to have.

    I'm glad that one of the big things that the companies are pushing now are going to be 4K displays for TVs because that means that (due to the shared manufacturing lines), the screens for computer monitors are going to get 4K screens eventually as well. I hate that you have to go out of your way to find a monitor that exceeds the 'television' format of 1080p.

    So, I'm really excited to see this be the new push, because I have little use for '3D'.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  22. People want more TVs than monitors in their house by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Didn't you get the memo? Computers are dead - it's going to be all tablets and ultralight laptops from now on. ;-)

    Seriously, though - the market for personal PCs is dropping, being replaced by small form factor devices. The market for "monitors" is on its way to niche status, rather than the mandatory with-every-computer-sold status it enjoyed. But everybody seems to need a TV is every room of their house, and with the super-thin models it's practical to just hang it on any empty wall. Instead of two computers/monitors and a single large TV, we're moving to no fixed computers and 3-5 TVs. Of course they'll market them as TVs.

    The only depressing thing is that they're in HDTV aspect ratios, which is less than ideal for a monitor. Then again, if you're getting 4k resolution, you've got all the real estate you need. (Hey, how 'bout they put the Panasonic tablet screen in a monitor - it's a lovely 3:2 ratio 3840x2650!)

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  23. /. Story Winner; this thread may now be closed by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that just about sums it up. If had mod points, you would get them. All.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  24. Not a "consumer" electronics show. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    84" touch screens and $20,000 4K LCDs aren't any more likely to make it into my living room than the iPotty.

    They call it the "Consumer" electronics show, but it hasn't been one for a while.

    An 84" touchscreen is a good candidate for digital signage and directory applications. Some businesses will buy them.

    The 4K LCD will drop in price sharply, and when it does, it will find applications. Probably for data visualization at first; that resolution is probably overkill for watching TV or movies at reasonable screen sizes and viewing distances (Except for the "audiophile" crowd, which doesn't care about such things.)

    The iPotty...yeah.

    1. Re:Not a "consumer" electronics show. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Right. Just like at my local mall. They have all these video ad signage displays. What do they use for the screen? "Movie" screen shaped TV's with an aspect ratio of around 2.4:1 instead of the taller 16:9 turned on their side. I don't know any consumer that's buying them. Completely unintended consequences, I'm sure. Instead of using them to watch movies filmed in a "Cinemascope" ratio, they are being used to sell designer shoes.

  25. iPotty is a revolution in potty training! by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    Only a person without a child would think iPotty is a stupid idea.

    While I don't have a child, my best buddy has a 3 year old that has been very difficult to get potty trained. They finally did so by using the iPad as a way to entice her to stay on the potty long enough to do her business. Within two weeks she is fully potty trained.

    There are two guarantees for every infant, they love iPad, and hate getting potty trained.

    How is this any dumber then the geek that hangs a TV in their bathroom?

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    1. Re:iPotty is a revolution in potty training! by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I have 3 kids, all finally potty trained. And it isn't really that hard. It takes a couple of days before they really get the hang of it, and some kids take longer to poop on the toilet, but I never understood why people have so much trouble with it. I have friends who give their kids big rewards every time they go to the bathroom. For my first two, they got a sticker on chart when they used the potty. And the third we didn't do that but I think he was easier because he understood that bigger kids did it. If they want something to do on the potty, just hand them a book, There's no way that mixing a $500 iPad and water is a good idea. Also, don't even use potties. Just get the special seat for the real toilet so they don't fall in. Otherwise, you have to teach them twice. Once to use the potty, and once to use the real toilet. Plus you don't have to clean out the plastic potty.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:iPotty is a revolution in potty training! by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      Because they're going to break your iPad

    3. Re:iPotty is a revolution in potty training! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      While I don't have a child, my best buddy has a 3 year old that has been very difficult to get potty trained. They finally did so by using the iPad as a way to entice her to stay on the potty long enough to do her business. Within two weeks she is fully potty trained.
      Yeah, that's how I litter-box trained my cat, too, but cleaning up the iPad afterwords sure is a mess. But you have to love technology. Before the iPad, only the editorial section could convince a cat to use the litter-box.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    4. Re:iPotty is a revolution in potty training! by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      My daughter is about 3 1/2 now and still refuses to finish potty training. She has been using the potty on and off for around 1 1/2 years now. She just doesn't give a crap about it. It's more convienent in her opinion to use her diaper. She's pretty decent about using the toilet for crapping, I can't remember when I changed a number 2 diaper last, but she rarely cares to piss in a toilet, she's got more interesting things to do than stop and go potty.

      I've known neices and nephews who refused to do it also until they ended up with a younger sibling that was doing it better than them. Nothing like sibling rivalries to motivate a kid.

      The child seat and the child sized potty don't seem to have caused her any confusion. The only extra challenge of the regular toilet is getting up onto it, and she solved that long ago when she found a wooden stool I made as a Cub Scout more than 25 years ago. She uses that stool all the time raising hell by getting into things she couldn't otherwise reach.

    5. Re:iPotty is a revolution in potty training! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You don't potty train a child. You let them train themselves. Our oldest wouldn't get potty trained until he had a little brother (at 3 and 1/2 years old) then potty trained himself within a week, as "only babies have diapers". The younger is now 3, and showing no signs of wanting to be potty trained. He knows when he poos, and sometimes announces it, but generally doesn't pay that much attention. So he's almost ready, but not quite. He'll let us know.

      Aggressive potty training is a parental problem, not a child problem. If they get to where they can change their own diaper, then there's an issue. Until then, it's all natural. No need to force it.

    6. Re:iPotty is a revolution in potty training! by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Does she put the diaper on by herself? Because once the potty training starts at our place, the diapers come off. Once they've had pee all over themselves a couple times they don't find going to the bathroom so inconvenient any more. We have some thicker underwear, and there's some with plastic outer liners to prevent a big mess, but it still makes the kid quite uncomfortable. Also, make them go to the potty every once in a while. Sometimes they tell you they don't have to go, but make them go every 1/2 hour for the first couple days. You can stretch it out as they start to figure it out. I'm not saying all kids are going to be as easy as mine were, but there are some things you can do to help the process along.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:iPotty is a revolution in potty training! by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I think a big part of the problem is that my daughter is a stubborn little cuss. She can be amazingly compliant sometimes and very helpful and such. But sometimes she decides that she is just going to do whatever she wants, come hell or high water. And so far potty training has been a reliable way to fire her up. Being wet doesn't bother her much as whenever it rains she tries to sneak out to play in it. So far training pants haven't worked as she seems to game the system, she knows there are only half a dozen of them and once she's gotten them all wet for the day she can just go back to diapers.

      I really am quite convinced that she is mentally potty trained but just refuses to actually use the toilet because diapers are more convienent in her mind. So far I haven't been able to think up a system to make it worth her while that wouldn't just be a setup for failure in another way.

  26. Behind the hobbyists a bit then by tttonyyy · · Score: 1

    Expensive drone considering £32 will buy you a Hubsan x4 then £4 from Hong Kong for a keychain spycamera stripped and stuck to the underneath = spy drone for £36. And you end up with a stable, smaller quad that is better built (no nasty polystyrene body).

    Some of the RC guys are experimenting with FPV for the Hubsan x4, there's a few vids on the forums of people flying it around their houses, first person style using lightweight video cams and TX modules.

    Quadrotors can be a world of fun without breaking the bank :)

    --
    biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    1. Re:Behind the hobbyists a bit then by slim · · Score: 1

      Sure, but $300 doesn't seem too shabby for a turnkey system, with a full support infrastructure.

      That director mode looks cool - have it do pre-programmed camera moves like pans and crane shots. If I was an amateur film-maker I'd be getting one in a flash.

    2. Re:Behind the hobbyists a bit then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you know, you could just build a full-sized 400mm quad with incredible real power and performance for about $100. Then you have $200 left over for radio and camera gear.

      The AR Drone is a joke in the multicopter world.

  27. Eh? by jandersen · · Score: 1

    I don't know about those two lists - is the fork thing stupid? I think what is stupid is the assumption that it is intended to somehow stop people from overeating; it isn't, it is only a device that may perhaps help the user keep track of the eating of a meal. This could be valuable information, just like keeping a food diary can.

    On the other hand, what is the sense of have a gigantic television screen with absurdly high resolution, when all you can watch is crappy programs or crappy computer games? It's a bit like owning a Ferrari when you only ever drive around in a 30 mph area; well, you get the idea.

    Are these lists really the best one can come up with? This kind of reporting seems to have been dredged from the bottom of the CESpit.

    1. Re:Eh? by DigitalReverend · · Score: 1

      You know, I actually like the idea of the fork. I have lost 30 lbs so far by doing 2 things. Decreasing portion sizes and concentrating on not eating fast. Simply decreasing portion sizes is good, but if I ate too fast I would still feel hungry and want more. Slowing down the speed of my eating seems to have given my body more time to signal the brain that I am slow, and having the fork would have been cool because during a good meal with friends, the last thing I wanted to pay attention to what the speed of my eating, and the fork would have been a handy reminder to slow down.

      --
      I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
    2. Re:Eh? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I've lost 40 lbs (and gained 10 back, I was a little too thin) since I left university by doing two things. Biking a lot, and eating real food. Commuting by bicycle to work was probably a huge factor (was biking about 40 km a day when I was at my lightest, my commute has since gotten shorter), but I didn't lose a lot of the weight until I stopped eating so much fast food, and started eating mostly meals that I or my wife prepared from basic ingredients. I still eat quite a bit, and I don't worry about portion sizes too much, but eating real food does cut down on calories. It's really easy to go to burger king and eat 1500-2000 calories. It's a lot harder to do that when you're at home and have water to drink, along with a meal that's made from whole foods.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it depends on the person of what you cook. My wife and I have been big into cooking from scratch for some time now. At first it was to save some money, and then later we got good enough to like the results better than other easy options, plus it has become a bit of a hobby. Despite that, I managed to gain 20 pounds over a year or two, even though I would walk to work, 30 minutes each way, and would eat out less than once a month. I only got that weight off by increasing my exercise schedule and lowering portion size.

    4. Re:Eh? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Walking is a terrible form of exercise, because it's too easy. Unless you're doing olympic speed walking, in which case you might as well go jogging, you aren't getting your heart/respiration rate up high enough to really qualify as exercise. Sure if you're 200 lbs overweight, it can have some advantages, but for most people it's just not strenuous enough to qualify as exercise. A quick Google brought me to this chart. Walking at a moderate pace only burns about 60 calories more per hour than darts, billiards, or "sitting playing with animals". Some surprising things that burn more calories than walking are Tai-Chi, Hacky Sack, Stretching, and general house work. Cycling is actually quite good at burning calories, and it's the kind of activity that you can do for hours on end, as opposed to something like running an 8 minute mile (which in terms of calories burned equates to biking at 16-19 mph (25-30 km/h))

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Eh? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Do it for 16 hours every weekend with a pack on your back in mountains and it's good exercise :)
      Of course that doesn't do anything for your arms.

    6. Re:Eh? by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Walking is a terrible form of exercise, because it's too easy.

      Exercise doesn't have to be perfect - it just has to be. Being physically active gives so many benefits that burning calories is only a minor point, really. Also, to somebody without any physical activity, walking is probably the best place to start.

      You are obviously a quite competitive person, who likes to challenge yourself; but a lot of us are not there yet. Any exercise is worth doing, from a health point of view, especially if you enjoy it.

  28. Where are zee googles!!!??? by Krneki · · Score: 1

    Oculus Rift is going to bring us the VR many have dreamt for years, sure this year they will only produce the developer version. But soon we will get the commercial version, higher resolution, lighter, even better tracking, ... and all that for 300$.

    Bring me the future NOW!

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  29. Re:Why didn't the second list make it onto the fir by DeathToBill · · Score: 1

    Nice. I'd better start looking for prior art.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
  30. We aren't going to get the best or worst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the parent company that is hosting this shop talk says what's allowed to be in.

  31. Don't laugh at the iPotty by Frankie70 · · Score: 2

    Some days down the line, there will be photographs of Angelina Jolie, Madonna and Beckham's kids using an iPotty. And then all the hipsters will make sure they buy one and will also post photos of it on twitter and facebook.
     

  32. Re:Why didn't the second list make it onto the fir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, a 20" tablet is one of the five dumbest ideas at CES, but a tablet measuring seven feet is one of the standouts? Hmmm.

    Hey, size matters!

  33. The sad thing... by gweilo8888 · · Score: 2

    ...is that the Parrot AR.Drone 2.0 being labeled as a standout was released getting on for a year ago now. Was this year's CES really so underwhelming, with so few interesting products, that the best we can cite are products that aren't even new?

  34. best quote ever by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Why come up with fancy marketing when you can just quote to the media: "Unlike traditional VPN solutions that don't work on mobile phones, this one does." That's some graceful stuff right there.

    1. Re:best quote ever by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Why come up with fancy marketing when you can just quote to the media: "Unlike traditional VPN solutions that don't work on mobile phones, this one does." That's some graceful stuff right there.

      It must really make you reconsider your worthless existence when your 'breakthrough' is a VPN that works on mobile phones after essentially all the mobile phones that matter to VPN users have switched to near-full desktop/OS networking stacks...

  35. Re:People want more TVs than monitors in their hou by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    The market for PCs is dropping because for most people (not gamers) there hasn't been a need to upgrade your PC in the last 5 years. Nothing has changed. I know this because I have a PC that it 6 years old, and it works perfectly fine and I feed no need to upgrade it. I'll buy a new one when it dies, because having a full size PC is nice, but I won't spend more than $400 on it. Putting a 4K touch screen on PC might actually give me a reason to go out and buy something new.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  36. Intellect Motion GameCube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised there was no mention of this one. Definitely the silliest idea to me. It's a HUGE harness system that looks like one of those "baby bounce" seats except 8 feet tall. After getting strapped in to it, you physically lean around and jump to move your character. There's a little gun attachment that is like a poor man's Wiimote, and the whole thing just looks absurd. Here's a video:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLIRXujOAO8

    I hope they get sued for copyright infringement or something (it seems no one who reports on this device even mentions or knows there was "GameCube" before this thing that was actually good).

    1. Re:Intellect Motion GameCube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow that thing was stupid. Also what game was that, Quake or something?

  37. Huawei's Ascend Mate by JustABlitheringIdiot · · Score: 1

    So just how long before I can expect this to be the next big POS offered from T-Mobile?

    Since they seem to have an issue getting better quality handsets, its inevitable that this Huawei phone will be theirs exclusively. I give it 4 months before it's their next "flagship" phone.

  38. 20 tablet? How about a 8.5x11" one? by xtal · · Score: 2

    Peferably with E-Ink, that I can write on, in similar DPI to a fine engineering pencil?

    I want one for specification sheets and notes. That's it. Doesn't really even need much of a OS. I have a desk full of paper. I will gladly pay $$$$$ for this device.. and I am sure that others will too.

    The retina ipad is good, but it's not paper.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:20 tablet? How about a 8.5x11" one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is a really useful idea. it should be writable with an actual pencil, and preferably be rollable for moving it around. it can be searched and browsed and the content can be tagged. the very minimal power requirements would be met by use of photovoltaics.

  39. Re:Why didn't the second list make it onto the fir by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    Be careful with that rock banging thing. If anyone hears your rocks, there's a good chance that you'll be infringing on a mobile communications patent.

    Apple might have a patent on just that. Sadly, I am not even sure if I'm only joking.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  40. Re:High resolution computer screens back? Please? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Except that a 52" 4K TV is less pixel-dense than a 1080p 17" laptop screen - or even less. It's just that the panels that the 17" laptop screens are cut out of are finally of a manufacturing quality that they can cut out a 52" screen with no major flaws. This is why bigger screens are so much more expensive.

    This is the trickle-down of the last generation of computer monitors.

  41. best and worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    worst: cbs's handling of hopper's nomination for award

    best: hopper. just because. it's not all that innovative (replay did commercial skipping years ago) but it's what people want. people do not want 20 minutes of commercials every hour. a generation ago, that amount was less than half that. the automatic recording of certain channels is a nice feature -- one that will *increase* viewership as people are more easily able to watch those programs that might otherwise not give a chance, yet networks are fighting it....

  42. Nectar - Power Supply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Nectar power supply is conspicuously not described as an electric fuel cell. But, I think that is exactly what it is! I'm guessing that its "power pods" are actually butane cylinders.

    They go out of their way to say;

    Both the Nectar Mobile Power System and Nectar Pods cartridges have been approved for carry-on and use aboard regular commercial aircraft by the UN International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and U.S. Department of Transportation.

    But, if I am right about it being a butane fuel cell, I suspect our friendly TSA agents will take issue with us carrying butane cylinders onboard, regardless of DoT approval. They won't allow a Bic lighter FFS!

    I can't wait to hear the bitching about losing your "approved" $300 power supply at the TSA check point.

  43. Re:Why didn't the second list make it onto the fir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAH! Yeah, like prior art has anythign to do with patents or copyright.

    Do you have more money than the person you're against? Then you win. Otherwise, you lose.

    So you'd better hope you have billions of dollars socked away in that cave.

  44. Worst thing for CES ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... was CBS.

  45. Re:Why didn't the second list make it onto the fir by robsku · · Score: 1

    So, a 20" tablet is one of the five dumbest ideas at CES, but a tablet measuring seven feet is one of the standouts? Hmmm.

    The 20" tablet was among dumb ideas because it was a 20" tablet - the gigantic touch screen was not because, get this, it wasn't a tablet but a touch screen, and a remarkable touch screen it is.

    Sheesh, I wish people read more carefully...

    --
    In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
  46. Re:Why didn't the second list make it onto the fir by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    And did we mention bigger batteries? Bloody expensive ones, too.

    Yeah, I can't figure out why there aren't more "USB battery boosters" that take AA batteries and put out 5V USB. Phone dying? Get AA batteries from anywhere, and get another 24 hours of power. Cheap and light (especially since you can carry it empty, and buy the batteries only when you need them).

  47. Re:Why didn't the second list make it onto the fir by dbIII · · Score: 1

    That's not all, there are VPNs! VPNs for smartphones!

    Just like OpenVPN on my N900 about three years ago, and probably on Android and iPhone ten minutes later.

  48. CES 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In CES 2013 We found Hands-on: NVIDIA Project Shield Handheld Gaming System. The latest and Upgraded technology.

  49. Re:Why didn't the second list make it onto the fir by DeathToBill · · Score: 1

    The only reason that's not called a tablet is you'd need concrete knees to hold the damn thing up.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
  50. Re:High resolution computer screens back? Please? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Except that a 52" 4K TV is less pixel-dense than a 1080p 17" laptop screen - or even less.

    What does that have to do with anything? Sooner or later there will be 17" 4K TVs, and then the panels will get cheaper for laptops.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  51. Re:High resolution computer screens back? Please? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Only everything to do with it. It means that affordable 4K computer screens are probably another generation away. Whereas 4K TV's are made with the actual same panels we already use for 1080p computer screens.

  52. Re:High resolution computer screens back? Please? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

    Except that a 52" 4K TV is less pixel-dense than a 1080p 17" laptop screen - or even less. It's just that the panels that the 17" laptop screens are cut out of are finally of a manufacturing quality that they can cut out a 52" screen with no major flaws. This is why bigger screens are so much more expensive.

    This is the trickle-down of the last generation of computer monitors.

    Yes, a 52" screen is less pixel dense than a 17" 1080p screen... Which is irrelevant because it isn't less pixel dense than a 52" 1080p screen.

    ie: I'm pretty sure that I'm glad that a 4k 24" screen will soon be able to replace my 1k 24" screen.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  53. Re:High resolution computer screens back? Please? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Since "K" (theater) resolutions are measurements of horizontal resolution, I expect you probably have a 2K screen (1920).

    I was just saying that affordable 52" 4K screens do not mean that we have the ability to manufacture affordable 24" 4K screens. If you remember HDTV's, you didn't start seeing small 1080p TV's until years later than the large ones.

    The density of screen that drives a 1080p 24" screen is already out there. So just cutting a larger screen out of this and calling it 4K is relatively easy. It doesn't work in reverse, and 4K 24" screens are further off.

  54. Re:High resolution computer screens back? Please? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

    Gotcha, thanks.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  55. iPotty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Souldn't that be the iPood ?