Slashdot Mirror


Rare Earth Elements Found In Jamaican Mud

stevegee58 writes "Jamaica was once home to a thriving bauxite (aluminum ore) industry. While Jamaican bauxite mining may have fallen on hard times, it seems that the bauxite tailings in the form of red mud are rich in rare earth elements. Japanese researchers have discovered rare earth elements in high concentrations in this red mud and have already invested $3M in a pilot project to extract them. Perhaps Chinese dominance of rare earth deposits is on the wane as global manufacturers continue to search for and find other deposits of these valuable minerals."

64 of 100 comments (clear)

  1. Jamaican Rum is like... by isopropanol · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mudders Milk..

    1. Re:Jamaican Rum is like... by isopropanol · · Score: 2

      clearly you have not met my mother.

  2. Awww, man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There goes my investment in Bucky Balls.

  3. "continue to search for and find other deposits" by trdtaylor · · Score: 5, Informative

    You make it sound like China is the only place in the world for Rare Earth metal deposits. The United States has the largest known deposits of Rare Earth metals, with mining plans in the works as we speak.

    Most important part of this story is extraction of rare earth metals that does not harm the local environment / still profitable

  4. "high concentrations" are still low... by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Must be quite low concentrations still, as otherwise they would have certainly known about it before. After all they've been mining bauxite there already, so certainly done a lot more research on that specific mud than on most of the rest of the mud on Earth.

    1. Re:"high concentrations" are still low... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hardly. That testing costs money, and most of it is residue from decades before the rare earths were relevant.

      Just ask how the Culliname was found. Sheer dumb luck.

  5. Re:"continue to search for and find other deposits by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Read up on Bukit Merah, Malaysia where rare earth metals where processed slag from old tin mines.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/09/business/energy-environment/09rareside.html?_r=0
    Thats the PR you have to face when you want to set up and "not harm the local environment"... in 201x
    You wonder why press releases talk of not doing rare earth projects in Australia due to
    power, water, chemical costs ...
    for some reason they go back to 'other' parts of the world :)

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  6. Re:the USA has it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hell, diamonds and emeralds are sprinkled all throughout the carolinas too

    Is it really that bad in the Carolinas?

  7. Re:"continue to search for and find other deposits by Carnildo · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Rare earths" aren't really all that rare. What's rare is finding them in high concentrations.

    --
    "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  8. Rare Earths by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Rare earths are NOT rare. They are in fact abundant in the crust.

    The problem with these materials is that deposits of rare earths are usually associated with stuff like Thorium. This makes the mining waste rather annoying.

    China has been willing to ignore this problem thereby cornering the market. Now they are getting the idea that being the world depository of rare earth mining waste may not be a good idea and are declining to sell to every Tom Disk and Harry at cut rate prices.

    So folks are looking for alternatives. The bauxite one sounds interesting.

    1. Re:Rare Earths by PPH · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thorium? Problem?

      I thought there was a potential nuclear fuel cycle under development that uses Thorium. So, while it may require some special handling, it has value and isn't a waste product to be dealt with.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Rare Earths by haruchai · · Score: 1

      China isn't "ignoring" the problem, they're refining and stockpiling the thorium. If their molten-salt reactor research pays off, they'll have decades of supply on hand.

      If not, they can use it in CANDU-style reactors.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    3. Re:Rare Earths by Telvin_3d · · Score: 2

      Thorium's not particularly rare either. And like most radioactive material it's far too big a pain-in-the-ass to bother with actually stockpiling it long term. The long term costs of string it will almost always exceed the cost of just refining it when needed.

    4. Re:Rare Earths by careysub · · Score: 1

      Since there is virtually no market for thorium at present (world trade figures are in the single digit tons), and none for the foreseeable future, it is a waste product that must be dealt with.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    5. Re:Rare Earths by careysub · · Score: 2

      the interests that control the USG are against the development of thorium-cycle reactors. And the USG will kill people to see to it that thorium-cycle reactors aren't available on a commercial scale anytime soon.

      Which is why the U.S. is active in the international Generation IV reactor research effort, that includes thorium powered designs?
      http://www.gen-4.org/
      http://www.gen-4.org/Technology/systems/msr.htm

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    6. Re:Rare Earths by Creepy · · Score: 1

      The US/US industry doesn't care about thorium reactors - the industry is only interested in the Integral Fast Reactor, burning uranium. At least IFR can burn nuclear waste, so it isn't a total loss, but we've already lost the race to develop them to Russia by continuously canceling our test reactors (Russia has two ~2000MW online and is building a full scale reactor from what I remember). The industry estimates that IFRs burning just nuclear wast can power the world for 1500 years. When the US (and British) nuclear industry talks about thorium, they ALWAYS mean in solid fuel reactors where it is an inferior fuel. When thorium advocates talk about thorium, they ALWAYS mean in a liquid fuel design based on the 1960s molten salt reactor experiment (MSRE).

      The private industry, China, and France seem to be the only ones that like LFTR (liquid fluoride thorium reactor, the modern update to the MSRE, though France's is liquid lithium, a less toxic salt, so it should be LLTR, but they call it something else), so even if the US eventually goes that direction, we will be last to develop a reactor and buy that tech from other countries. The US is no longer an innovator in this area, we are a consumer, and the NRC and congress is at fault for most of it.

    7. Re:Rare Earths by rgbatduke · · Score: 2

      There is a major difference between talk and prototyping. We built small scale prototypes of liquid thorium salt reactors forty or fifty years ago, but politics shut down the development when money was requested to go the next step and build a prototype to scale. We could pick up where we left off in less than a year if money were committed not to paper research that delays the project indefinitely but to prototyping and practical engineering, actually building one or more of the damn things and tinkering as we go to solve engineering problems in situ, not in theoretical analysis.

      We could revive the last working thorium design in at most a year or two -- it didn't take that long to build the first time. We could be working on scaling it up in parallel, so that we had a working scale model in four or five years tops. We could be building working full scale LFTR power plants by 2020, and could solve both the "carbon problem" and the world's energy poverty problem by 2030 to 2040 and coast to world peace and abundance by 2050. The cost through the working scale model is on the order of a few billion dollars, tops. We used to spend that much in Iraq every week.

      Or we could continue to dick around investing billions into wind power that requires the rare earth magnets that come from processing Thorium rich salts somewhere and that don't generate power when the wind doesn't blow, which is most of the time. We could continue to drop billions down the rat-hole of defending "free" access to major oil deposits under the guise of defending national security or promoting personal and religious freedoms for people living half a world away. We can make bankers and corporate interests rich with complex 'carbon trading' schemes that so far have had zero effect on global CO_2 levels at enormous annualized costs, costs so great that they probably single handedly caused the European banking crisis (or could have ameliorated it in any event). We spend more money on long-shot always a decade away fusion energy than we do on LFTR, and burned more federal money on solar cells in one failed company than it would cost to get started on LFTR.

      There is a singular lack of urgency in thorium based energy research and investment. Too many people make too much money within the status quo.

      rgb

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
  9. Re:Ok, let's all wait by Seumas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You mean, let's see how long until we declare that the Jamaican people need to be "liberated".

    Or . . . how long until we need to send a massive force there after a "natural disaster" to help out.

  10. Re:"continue to search for and find other deposits by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Funny, I thought what was rare was finding them in high concentrations in places where labor is cheap and environmental laws lax.

  11. Failed operation by SysKoll · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Chinese government had grabbed the rare earth market by cutting down prices (yes, labor camps and lax pollution rules help). Then they restricted supply, attempting to force Western manufacturers to bring to China all productions of materials using rare earths. Within months, out-of-China RE production that was shut down because of cost resumed, and prices actually went down. It's all in this amusing article written by a guy who used to trade this stuff.

    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

  12. Bauxite scandal in India by Frankie70 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.openthemagazine.com/article/nation/how-big-business-gets-its-way

    Locals jailed for all kinds of silly reasons if they opposed the mining.

    1. Re:Bauxite scandal in India by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Isn't it... funny... how the adorable little theories about 'contracts' and 'consenting parties' dissolve when they hit the ground?

  13. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    One less reason for the "we're running out of metals!" schizophrenics to trot out their tired Space Age "asteroid mining" propaganda....

  14. Re:the USA has it too by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 2

    Haha. As a Californian, I can sympathize with west-coastie-toasties who do feel that being stuck in the Carolinas is "hell", but I truly did not intend to imply that sort of meaning at all. Hell is more likely to be sprinkled amongst the 'zonies with the constant left-turn blinkers on! (ducks for cover as the 'zonies get their GPS's to recalculate their bearings to come attack me with bad driving...) ;>)

  15. "natural disaster" by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    Or . . . how long until we need to send a massive force there after a "natural disaster" to help out.

    Oh, that can be arranged ...

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:"natural disaster" by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny

      First, fly to Brazil and obtain a butterfly...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    2. Re:"natural disaster" by RoboJ1M · · Score: 3, Funny

      Next, teach it the dance moves from gangnam style...

  16. Re:Ok, let's all wait by black6host · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You mean, let's see how long until we declare that the Jamaican people need to be "liberated".

    Or . . . how long until we need to send a massive force there after a "natural disaster" to help out.

    In the old days one might interpret "massive force" as military. I think we could go straight to a massive corporate presence as it is they who control things anyway. If that doesn't work then we have trade sanctions, etc and finally the military. If this scenario is not for today, my guess is it will be soon.

  17. Re:Ok, let's all wait by djl4570 · · Score: 2

    They are more abundant than gold, silver or PGM. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare_earth_metal has a decent discussion.

  18. Re:Ok, let's all wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Luckily, Jamaican people really do need to be liberated from violent crime. Especially gay Jamaican people.

  19. I hope it pans out for them by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    Jamaica could stand some good luck for a change.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I hope it pans out for them by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Not. Gonna. Happen.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  20. Re:"continue to search for and find other deposits by jackgrass_jr · · Score: 1

    A Missouri mine for example. The mine is actually active again to an extent.

  21. Next step... by FrankSchwab · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, China created an artificial monopoly by selling below cost and driving all other producers out of business...

    Then raised prices and restricted supply to drive costs up....

    And the free market responded with new suppliers entering the market...

    So China will let them spend billions of dollars developing their new sources, and we'll all go back to step 1 before they make a dimes worth of profit.

    --
    And the worms ate into his brain.
    1. Re:Next step... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Unless other countries finally say fuck this and put tariffs on Chinese rare earths. I'm not a big fan of tariffs for protectionism, but punitive tariffs can be pretty useful.

  22. Re:"continue to search for and find other deposits by Dahamma · · Score: 1

    The subsidy part could be compared, but not the destroying competition. No one else even WANTS to grow corn to compete - the subsidy is because of all the farmers who don't know how to do anything else, so they keep growing it when no one even wants it.

  23. Re:Ok, let's all wait by symbolset · · Score: 1

    "We'll offer to trade their supply for some *xx-iron-xx* lead."

    /Sorry, /. doesn't do <strike>

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  24. China's doing fine by symbolset · · Score: 1

    Instead of selling "rare" earths for 1M times the extraction cost, they will tell 10x as much at only 500K extraction costs. Net win.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  25. Well Hurray for Mud! by rve · · Score: 1

    The place I live has an abundance of mud. The mud here is heavy and pitch black, and absolutely everywhere some 9 months of the year. It would probably be good for growing food if temperatures ever rose over 65 degrees. If only it were as useful as that rare Jamaican mud, this place would be rich.

    1. Re:Well Hurray for Mud! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      It's official. We have discovered Elbonia. Soon, Jamaica's principal export will be mud.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Well Hurray for Mud! by chthon · · Score: 1

      You are from Elbonia?

    3. Re:Well Hurray for Mud! by Ed_1024 · · Score: 2

      This mud is no ordinary mud. There are significant deposits of Ganjonium, Tokalite and Reeferine alongside the rare earths...

  26. Re:Ok, let's all wait by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Really? You are suggesting that the US will invade Jamaica to get rare earth metals? Go Obama?

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  27. Maybe not by dbIII · · Score: 1

    The tailings may be gravity seperated into conveniently concentrated layers especially if a lot of water was involved.

  28. Re:Ok, let's all wait by cusco · · Score: 1

    "Corporate presence" and "military" are getting close all the time. Blackwater (whatever its name is this week) has the largest non-governmental arsenal in the world, larger than some countries in fact.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  29. Re:"continue to search for and find other deposits by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

    Wow, that's an even bigger waste of taxpayers money than I originally thought. Can't they use the money to educate the farmers how to grow something useful and which foodstuff will grow on their land?

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  30. Re:Ok, let's all wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes they are not rare, why so many articles about new deposits? The problem is the processing industry. It is difficult to separate the individual rare earths since they are chemically very similar. The industrie needed for this is expensive and dirty.

  31. Re:"continue to search for and find other deposits by jrumney · · Score: 1

    Most important part of this story is extraction of rare earth metals that does not harm the local environment / still profitable

    / in a country that is willing to overlook the environmental and health issues.

  32. Re:Ok, let's all wait by nu1x · · Score: 3, Informative

    Academi, formerly known as Xe, formerly known as Blackwater -- killing people, for money !

    Ahoy !!

    --
    I have nothing to lose but my bindings.
  33. Re:Ok, let's all wait by oodaloop · · Score: 1

    Yeah, like how we liberated Iraq then left and Iraq still has their oil. Like that?

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  34. Re:"continue to search for and find other deposits by NReitzel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Finding "rare" earths isn't that difficult. In this country, the problem is that rare earth elements (technically lanthanides) are invariably associated with the other f-series elements (the actinides), specifically thorium. Mining rare earths produces thorium oxide as a byproduct, and "disposing" of this ought-to-be-valuable stuff is a real difficulty. In China, it's less of a problem, for two reasons. First, it's apparently OK to dump radioactive waste in your local waterway, and second, the Chinese government doesn't shun all things nuclear. Like reactors, and bombs, and Oh Yes, thorium deposits.

    Now, finding rare earth deposits with almost no thorium in them is a real feat, and getting the US government to find ways to store thorium would a world-class miracle.

    --

    Don't take life too seriously; it isn't permanent.

  35. Re:"continue to search for and find other deposits by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

    Now, finding rare earth deposits with almost no thorium in them is a real feat, and getting the US government to find ways to store thorium would a world-class miracle.

    Are you saying that the issue is that there's no way of storing thorium acceptable to the regulators, or that you want to have the government responsible for handling the cost of storage? Because those are very different things: The first case is legitimately the regulator's fault, but the second case is businesses just trying to make the taxpayers pay their costs of doing business.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  36. Re:Ok, let's all wait by aurispector · · Score: 1

    Mali is essentially a failed state with islamic jihadis fronting the "revolution". Nice guys, those.

    If they take over, nobody will mine anything in their religious paradise on earth.

    --
    I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
  37. Dig it! by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    Jamaica Man.

  38. Re:the USA has it too by mortonda · · Score: 1

    Haha. As a Californian, I can sympathize with west-coastie-toasties who do feel that being stuck in the Carolinas is "hell",

    Funny, I was thinking the same thing about being stuck in California... ;)

  39. Like Diamonds by nebular · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of Diamonds. DeBeers got away with, in many cases, literal murder while having a near monopoly on the african diamond mines. As far as people knew then, that was the only place to get diamonds. Now they're showing up all over the place.

    Been pretty good for the Northern Canadian economy, hopefully rare earth elements will do the same for Jamaica.

  40. Check out the gadolinium reading . . . by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    Obligatory Sum of All Fears quote.

  41. Re:"continue to search for and find other deposits by careysub · · Score: 3, Informative

    Uhm why not just put the Thorium back into the mine, where it came from?

    That is often impossible in an active mine, and in a strip mining situation there is no "mine" to put it into.

    By its nature mining takes solid consolidated rock in which nasty materials are locked up (which is why they are there to be found in concentrated form) and turns it into powder from which is now easily leached or transported by water and wind. It is possible to find ways to secure the tails, but that costs money and drives up prices (making the product less competitive) or cuts into profits, both of which mining companies hate. Only strict outside (usually government) oversight keeps mining companies from turning most every mine site into a leaky, ugly toxic waste dump.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  42. Re:"continue to search for and find other deposits by rgbatduke · · Score: 1

    Now, finding rare earth deposits with almost no thorium in them is a real feat, and getting the US government to find ways to store thorium would a world-class miracle.

    No, a world class miracle would be getting the U. S. government to fund the development of an LFTR that would provide the world with essentially unlimited cheap electricity, provide us with ample supples of rare earth elements and other exotic but useful isotopes as a side effect, generate almost no nuclear waste (LFTR consumes nearly all of the meso-scale "waste" like plutonium and turns it into energy), in a process that cannot melt down (the reaction just stops) in a reactor vessel that is not pressurized, using fuel that does not have to be hand assembled and delivered only by the company that made your reactor originally, at a small fraction of the cost of solid Uranium Oxide fuel, using reactions that make it relatively difficult to build bombs undetected, while eliminating world (energy) poverty without the use of carbon (whether or not you happen to think CO_2 is a problem, carbon fuels release more radioactivity than all the nuclear plants on earth combined times 100, soot, a variety of known carcinogens, teratogenic mercury, and acid precursors).

    But no, we have to protect General Electric and Westinghouse and our ability to scavenge plutonium from expended and enormously expensive fuel. Big oil or coal is happy to invest all sorts of chump change in solar and wind projects because they know that they are not viable without subsidy and the subsidy is always enough to make them break even or win a bit economically without threatening their main profit stream. Thorium would disrupt the entire energy delivery system and drop the cost of energy in all forms dramatically, at the expense of huge recurring profits for some huge players that make equally huge contributions to the entire political establishment. So while storing thorium would make enormous sense, we will neither store it nor invest in using it until the need to do so exceeds the price of votes in Washington. Which, sadly, will be around a decade after the Chinese perfect the technology and market it to the entire world, including us, while maintaining a virtual monopoly on the heavier rare earths (as noted, almost always found with Thorium as a "pollutant"). Hell, even fusion might happen first, and that is an uphill battle all the way.

    It's actually an excellent bellwether of the Green movement. At the moment, it is perfectly happy to condemn two billion plus of the world's population to continue to live in energy poverty so profound that they burn dung to cook on, wash clothes (if at all) by hand, and use oil lamps (if anything) to light the night while pushing enormous sums into technologies (like wind) that are visibly a major fail and will remain so into the indefinite future. They trumpet the dangers of CO_2 and catastrophic global warming in the distant future while perpetuating the ongoing real time catastrophe that affects over a third of the earth's population right now, while playing into the hands of the very agents that provide the carbon based power they demonize as the alternatives they push are not technologically or economically feasible (yet).

    The one existing technology that "could" permit the continuation of civilization and reduction of global poverty while reducing CO_2 production at a feasible cost is nuclear (which is not a single technology but a many technologies, some of them the subject of research and development). Thorium based reactors are in a sense proven technology -- they were built back in the 60s and 70s and successfully run long enough to verify that they are indeed almost certainly a safe, meltdown-proof nuclear technology with far lower risks and far greater benefits in every category from cost to waste to nuclear proliferation -- but they do require four or five years of intensive research to complete an engineering cycle to scale. The day the Greens recognize this and take their foot off of the backs

    --
    Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
  43. Re:"continue to search for and find other deposits by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

    The free market says eliminate the subsidies - farmers will figure out for themselves whether it still makes sense to grow corn.

    --
    Redundancy is good And also good.
  44. Re:"continue to search for and find other deposits by Creepy · · Score: 1

    Actually, the first assertion is very close to the truth - the NRC highly regulates access to thorium because of proliferation concerns, even though you'd need a nuclear reactor to make it into a useable nuclear weapon and it wouldn't be terribly effective in a dirty bomb. China just dumps it into landfills. It is an insoluble metal, so worries about it getting into the water table (alpha emitters are only really only dangerous if ingested, and thorium is a relatively slow one) is probably a non-issue.

  45. Re:the USA has it too by rgbatduke · · Score: 2

    Hell yes! Sapphires too. Even gold mines (one of the largest gold mines in the world prior to the California gold rush is a few miles from where I'm sitting). But you do have to watch out if you want to mine any of this stuff, or you'll catch hell.

    North Carolina has Uranium as well, but there is so strong a NIMBY movement that any politician that suggested that we mine it and achieve energy independence in the state would find himself going to hell in a handbasket. Thorium too -- in the form of Monzanite Sands, which are -- surprise -- around 24% lanthanum, about 17% neodymium, and full of other useful stuff as well. The minute somebody realizes that national "rare earth shortages" are complete bullshit caused almost entirely by our reluctance to treat Thorium as a potentially useful nuclear fuel instead of as a pollutant, there will be hell to pay, but in the long run North Carolina has more than enough heaven in it to compensate.

    Personally, sitting as I am a mere fifteen or twenty miles from Shearon-Harris (a pressurized water nuclear plant with one of the largest nuclear waste cooling pool facilities in the world) I'd be thrilled if our state took a hell of a risk and directly invested in the promotion of rare earth mining with the deliberate extraction of the associated Thorium and in the further investment in Thorium based nuclear reactors that produce "no" nuclear waste in comparison with Uranium Oxide, but between NIMBY and corporate interests that currently make shit-piles of money providing UO fuel or coal based energy, it will be a cold day in Half Hell, NC before that happens.

    rgb

    --
    Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
  46. Re:"continue to search for and find other deposits by Dahamma · · Score: 1

    And now you understand why most American cattle are corn fed (even through grass is their natural food, healthier for the cattle and tastes better for the beef consumer), soft drinks use high fructose corn syrup instead of sugar, and fuel ethanol is based on corn instead of other significantly more efficient ethanol sources...

  47. Re:Ok, let's all wait by Reeznarch · · Score: 1

    Looks like somebody's suffering from low self esteem.