Slashdot Mirror


Multi-State AT&T U-Verse Outage Enters Third Day

SonicSpike writes "AT&T U-verse customers are reporting this morning that an outage that began Monday and is affecting at least 15 states is still not resolved. Some customers were told this morning that the problem will not be fixed for at least 24 hours."

202 comments

  1. Somewhere out there by crazyjj · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...is a U-verse subscriber who's freaking out because he can't let his friends know how shitty the service was at McDonalds this morning. Right now he's thinking "They'll never get to hear me say 'Forget the McMuffin, how about some McPoliteness?'"

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:Somewhere out there by Huggs · · Score: 1

      Well, at least we all know now. Thank you for sharing.

    2. Re:Somewhere out there by Eightbitgnosis · · Score: 0

      You're kinda big on negative generalizations, aren't you?

    3. Re:Somewhere out there by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      About U-verse subscribers or McDonalds customers?

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    4. Re:Somewhere out there by skitchen8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I can say for certain your signature is pretty stupid.

    5. Re:Somewhere out there by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      Except people like that update twitter from their phones.

    6. Re:Somewhere out there by Eightbitgnosis · · Score: 0

      Between the negative generalization in your post, and the negative generalization in your signature; I'm just seeing a lot of negative generalization.

  2. This is surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    After all, AT&T charges some of the highest rates for internet access in the world, and it's very slow. I assumed that this was because all the money was going into rock solid reliability instead of speed. Right? Right?

    1. Re:This is surprising by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Funny

      Reliable and speed... ...in the CEO's latest Italian car.

    2. Re:This is surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If what you say is true, then the Italians should let the car makers run the government.

    3. Re:This is surprising by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Obviously you have never owned an Italian car. Speed in some models, but never reliability. Ever.

    4. Re:This is surprising by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Really? It doesn't seem a bad deal to me for internet-only ISP. What's cheaper and faster?

    5. Re:This is surprising by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously the CEO is using reliability via redundancy. If he has 10 fast Italian cars, he's got a decent chance that at least one works at any given time.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    6. Re:This is surprising by Burning1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I suspect that the CEO lost his N+2 italian car redundency, and placed his best techs on solving the problem, rather than maintaining the u-verse service.

    7. Re:This is surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone else is faster when you're getting no service from your ISP. Play again, fanboi.

    8. Re:This is surprising by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Fix It Again, Tony!

    9. Re:This is surprising by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Really? It doesn't seem a bad deal to me for internet-only ISP. What's cheaper and faster?

      Right now, for the customers in those 15 states, my 300 baud modem connected to AOL is faster and cheaper.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:This is surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you have never owned an Italian car. Speed in some models, but never reliability. Ever.

      Is Lamborghini still considered Italian now that the (German) VW Group owns it?

    11. Re:This is surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Internet access in Korea and Japan.

    12. Re:This is surprising by davidbrit2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the failover time gets worse the more distance you've covered.

    13. Re:This is surprising by kolbe · · Score: 1

      FIAT:

      Fix It Again Toy

      Obviously someone doesn't look at the real reliability of Italian made vehicles... From FIAT to Ferrari... they're all built like crap.

    14. Re:This is surprising by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Reliable and speed... ...in the CEO's latest Italian car.

      I guess you've never driven a FIAT, neither fast nor reliable.

      I guess that's a good analogy for AT&T.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    15. Re:This is surprising by mjwx · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obviously the CEO is using reliability via redundancy. If he has 10 fast Italian cars, he's got a decent chance that at least one works at any given time.

      Redundant Array of Expensive Ferrari's?

      How would that work if it broke down whilst he was driving? will he need to tow the other 9 Ferrari's to ensure that he has the ability to failover at any time?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    16. Re:This is surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, Chrysler is so much better which why Fiat came to the rescue.

    17. Re:This is surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the slowdown is the hit you get while keyword scanning by wiretap fishing expeditions.

    18. Re:This is surprising by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      I got an ad today from them, they offered me 3 meg service for the same price I pay comcast for 6 meg service. The only reason why I switched from ATT is my 3 meg service constantly ran at 768k to 1.5Mb

    19. Re:This is surprising by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I can't really do comcast without some rewiring or going wifi, and I know many more people who complain about them then anything else (as in "I'd drop them but they're bundled with my cable").

    20. Re:This is surprising by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Chances are that these people don't have phone service either. AT&T likes to push it's "one big bundle". So these people probably don't have anything to connect a serial modem to.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    21. Re:This is surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thread derailment

      http://gallery.wewt.net/albums/funny/derail.jpg

    22. Re:This is surprising by bibliophage · · Score: 1

      "I'd drop them but they're bundled with my cable"

      The way I got around that is by signing up for business class service. No cable required, and (at least here in KC) it costs the same as their consumer internet plan. You also get a static IP and no data caps, if that matters to you. You don't need a company, though they'll ask you for a company name. Just make something up.

      --
      There are four boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  3. They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up fo by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up for this.

  4. Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a list of the actual states?

    1. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Arkansas, Georgia, Texas, Louisiana, South Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee, Mississippi, Florida, Kentucky, Alabama and Oklahoma are cited across multiple sources, including http://www.arkansasbusiness.com/article/90315/att-u-verse-experiencing-widespread-outages . I couldn't find any other sources that mentioned three more states, but eyeballing a map of the US, and how some mentioned the 'southwest' too, I suspect Arizona and New Mexico may be involved as well.

    2. Re:Which states? by Huggs · · Score: 5, Informative
      http://www.arkansasbusiness.com/article/90315/att-u-verse-experiencing-widespread-outages
      Not a complete list, but its limited to more southern states. FTA:

      "Arkansas, Georgia, Texas, Louisiana, South Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee, Mississippi, Florida, Kentucky, Alabama and Oklahoma."

    3. Re:Which states? by bobthesungeek76036 · · Score: 1

      According to ArkansasBusiness.com: "Customers have also flooded AT&T's Facebook page community support forums to report their outages, with complaints hailing from states including Arkansas, Georgia, Texas, Louisiana, South Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee, Mississippi, Florida, Kentucky, Alabama and Oklahoma. A number of them said they had experienced U-verse outages since Monday. Many of these customers have reported that the restart fix suggested by U-verse support was not working."

      --
      Karma: Bad
    4. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Albuquerque the largest city in New Mexico is mainly Comcast, so i have internet. Southern New Mexico, Las Cruces and other small cities very close to Texas may use AT&T as well as eastern New Mexico which is close to Texas and Oklahoma. I have no clue about Arizona.

    5. Re:Which states? by Binary+Ninja · · Score: 0

      The democrats had the internet turned down in the redneck states? Just to keep things quiet in for the inauguration?

      Didn't fastixx notice a drop in ticket sales for monster truck races ?

    6. Re:Which states? by Megane · · Score: 1

      In other words, the SBC and Bell South states. (The current lowercase "at&t" is SBC renamed after buying out what was left of the original uppercase "AT&T".) On the other hand, I've got the impression that those are most of the states in which U-verse is even offered.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    7. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet it is working for me in Texas. No problems at all in the last few weeks.

    8. Re:Which states? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Arkansas, Georgia, Texas, Louisiana, South Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee, Mississippi, Florida, Kentucky, Alabama and Oklahoma

      Is it just me or has the internet seemed a little smarter on average for the last few days...

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    9. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's all the areas being affected, posting anon since I work for them, and I'm not entirely sure I'm allowed to post this info.

      Atlanta (Tucker), GA
      Baton Rouge, LA
      Birmingham, AL
      Charleston, SC
      Charlotte, NC
      Columbia, SC
      Fayetteville, AR
      Greensboro, NC
      Greenville, SC
      Jackson, MS
      Jacksonville, FL
      Knoxville, TN
      Little Rock, AR
      Louisville, KY
      Memphis, TN
      Miami, FL
      Mobile, AL
      Nashville, TN
      New Orleans, LA
      Oklahoma City, OK
      Orlando (Daytona Beach), FL
      Raleigh, NC
      Tulsa, OK
      West Palm Beach, FL

      These areas should be resolved by now:
      Austin, TX
      Corpus Christi, TX
      Dallas (Richardson), TX
      El Paso, TX
      Houston, TX
      Lubbock, TX
      Odessa (Midland), TX
      San Antonio, TX

      Here's what I know about it as a lowly peon in the company: The DHCP daemon on a server in Richardson, TX, can't handle all the DHCP requests, and so keeps restarting every 10 minutes. When it's up, requests go through fine.

    10. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, both of us in truly rural North Carolina don't have dem big city isps like ah-tee-n-tee. We're still here.

    11. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Missouri is a former-SBC state, and my U-Verse is working fine (as of last night, anyway, I haven't tried it today).

    12. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same for me in Austin. And Thank God, too. My backup is Verizon LTE and Panera/Starbucks.

    13. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cox used to have DHCP issues. I just ran ipconfig, got the info from my old IP and typed it in as a static IP. Problem solved

    14. Re:Which states? by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

      From what I've gathered from various sources, the specific problem is that the server used to authenticate the RG to U-verse is borked. So... as long as your RG was authenticated PRIOR to the outage, your service should keep working. HOWEVER, if you lose power (or something else happens that requires it to re-authenticate), your service will go bye-bye too until they get the problem fixed.

      Right now, I'm hoping that authentication isn't required for DHCP renewal... because if it is, those of us who had service this morning probably have close to 50-50 odds of NOT having service tonight (or tomorrow morning... odds assume 1-week DHCP lease).

      All I can say is, if my service goes down & I get a nastygram from AT&T for tethering, I'll be seriously torn between:

      a) challenging them to just TRY and decrypt my VPN traffic to prove it, or

      b) telling them to fuck off, and demanding a free gigabyte of overage data per week (or fraction thereof) until my service gets restored... unless they want to risk losing a customer with TV (U300), internet (24/3), VoIP (unlimited), AND mobile phone (Android450 w/3gb data and unlimited text/mobile2mobile) service.

    15. Re:Which states? by adolf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cox used to have DHCP issues. I just ran ipconfig, got the info from my old IP and typed it in as a static IP. Problem solved

      Clever, but can't work with U-Verse: The supplied "Home Gateway" (VDSL modem and router combo-box) is sufficiently locked-down to preclude any such tinkering. The WAN address (and gateway, and, and, and) comes from DHCP, period, address if there is no DHCP response then it defaults to 0.0.0.0.

      In this state it cannot route packets, since it has no valid default route, and it stays broken until DHCP gets un-borked.

      Furthermore, the only modems that work with U-Verse are those supplied by AT&T, so there's no chance of using third-party gear to work around the issue.

      (That all said: What the fuck, AT&T? 15 states all relying on one box? I've been bitched out here on Slashdot for running a singular mail server with no diverse redundancy for a small company, while you've got fuckloads of paying customers relying on one machine?)

    16. Re:Which states? by trevelyon · · Score: 2

      If this is really true and it is a single DHCP server handling requests from this huge geographical area then they get the ISP Darwin Award IMO. That said not to call you a liar or anything but I can't see something like this causing a 3 day outage. It's just not that hard to fix this kind of problem.

    17. Re:Which states? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Yeah but you're S.L.O.W.

      And your downloads take a long time too! ;-)

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    18. Re:Which states? by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      Business service here in Baton Rouge, LA working just fine as far as I can see no outages in my logs.

    19. Re:Which states? by puto · · Score: 1

      All the what were Bell South States, the geode sits in Jacksonville and most of the hardware was in Atlanta. Texas of course was originally SBC.

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    20. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arkansas, Georgia, Texas, Louisiana, South Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee, Mississippi, Florida, Kentucky, Alabama and Oklahoma

      Is it just me or has the internet seemed a little smarter on average for the last few days...

      That was so funny I quoted it on my FB page. And I just got my service back here in Miami.

    21. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I believe they were hacked big time but won't come out with that for "National Security" reasons.

    22. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meaning this is what cyber wars are going to look like.

    23. Re:Which states? by detritus. · · Score: 1

      The south shall rise again!

    24. Re:Which states? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      +5 funny? WTF, how did this racist shit get modded up? Those are all states with large African-American minorities.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    25. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can confirm this anon as far as the list goes. That is official.

    26. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just you, because AT&T can only be bothered to offer U-Verse in the areas where rich white folks live in the first place!

    27. Re:Which states? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Racist? Seriously?

      It's a tongue in cheek slam on the luddite South...which is majority WHITE.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    28. Re:Which states? by messymerry · · Score: 1

      You insensitive clod, I'm in Texas

      --
      Dear Microlimp: I give you 2 valid product keys for win7 and you reject both of them. Piss off you wankers!!!
    29. Re:Which states? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Well bless your heart...

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    30. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uverse tech here confirming that list, staright from the email. can also confirm they keep saying the outtage is cleared iin TX when it was veryt much not so

    31. Re:Which states? by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      I've got the impression that those are most of the states in which U-verse is even offered.

      Here in So Cal, U-verse is available in my apartment complex, but only in two of the seven buildings. Go figure. I use Charter, the lesser of two evils.

    32. Re:Which states? by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

      Ok, so the big question is WTF is AT&T doing with ONE dhcp server for the entire u-verse network, but the bigger question is WHY haven't they just spun up another one to replace it? How long does it take to install an OS, install a DHCP daemon and configure some scopes? A few hours? A day at most?

    33. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racist? Seriously?

      It's a tongue in cheek slam on the luddite South...which is majority WHITE.

      Which is still being racist.

    34. Re:Which states? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Actually not, I'm happy to include all races in my fun making of the South.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    35. Re: Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are their thought processes.

      That's why it takes until next week to realize that they just boinked their sister, and a month to realize it was wrong.

    36. Re:Which states? by klui · · Score: 1

      Get with the program. Executives can't get funding for their bonuses if the company is going to spend money on actual infrastructure.

      There was this article that stated that AT&T's infrastructure expenditure has been flat for the past few years while rates have risen. I suppose running on one DHCP server is one way to save money.

    37. Re:Which states? by adolf · · Score: 1

      Meh.

      Yes, my rates have gone up (though not appreciably) with AT&T over the past few years.

      But having folks rely on one single point of failure in a system of this scale is a problem that is easily and cheaply corrected, and this is something that should be well-known within companies such as AT&T whose whole business model has always revolved around providing and maintaining reliable infrastructure.

      (And by "cheap," I mean a few thousand dollars in hardware and a crew to implement and test it. Total expense: Far less than a singular VRAD cabinet that can only serve a few hundred customers. Servicing DHCP requests against a database is not exactly the most demanding thing in the world, and there's no reason (especially money!) to support having such a failure point.)

  5. They forgot by Sparticus789 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone forgot to feed the hamster.

    --
    sudo make me a sandwich
    1. Re:They forgot by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Hamster... what are you smoking?

      It's obviously too many trucks backing up the inter-pipes.

    2. Re:They forgot by crazyjj · · Score: 2

      You would think they would treat their only technician better.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    3. Re:They forgot by sjames · · Score: 1

      You clearly have no idea what you're talking about, hamsters cost money! They prefer demented homeless people these days so they can chuck them out for new ones when they start wanting food.

  6. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    yes they should. lets just enable it on everyones bill and make the first month free.

    turn an outage into a marketing strategy.

  7. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by firex726 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does AT&T even offer an SLA for it's residential customers?

  8. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, you get a credit on your account.

  9. Me Verse by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mine is working fine. Sucks to be y 998kjhkh CARRIER LOST

    --
    Place nail here >+
    1. Re:Me Verse by theskipper · · Score: 1

      Nah, you got 'carrier lost' because your mom tried dialing the upstairs phone.

    2. Re:Me Verse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why but I still find this joke so funny.

    3. Re:Me Verse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You *really* need a Joke-Update, most people here where born after the last dialup-modem on the western world has been used.

    4. Re:Me Verse by antdude · · Score: 1

      U-Verse uses dial-up? ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    5. Re:Me Verse by chrish · · Score: 1

      It used to be fun to type this in messages:

      +++ATH0

      Also known as, "How to find out who's using a crappy terminal emulator on your BBS."

      --
      - chrish
    6. Re:Me Verse by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

      You must be using one of those nonstandard modems...normal modems would say NO CARRIER. Trust me, I dealt with dial-up to BBS systems on noisy phone lines all through the 90s, and actually kind of miss the simplicity from time to time.

  10. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, but there are legal minimums in the state I live in if they want to bill us. The service has to work at least seven days per month. When I was with Charter, they made sure they kept the service up for at least that long each month. All of the down time helped me make friends during football season when a crowd of us would end-up at whichever house among our friends or friends of friends that had working cable on Sundays to watch the NFL. Last fall, Charter was down locally for every single Carolina Panthers game.

  11. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by microcars · · Score: 4, Informative

    We had an odd problem with the U-Verse phone service where it would not display the Caller ID for my MIL.
    My wife won't answer the phone if she can't see the Caller ID, so if it says "UNAVAILABLE" she will let it ring.
    I tried to get them to figure out what was wrong and after about 2 hours they figured it out.
    The rep was very apologetic and offered to "make it up" to us because we were so "understanding"
    He offered 1 month of Free HBO

    I asked him what was our obligation after that free month.
    He paused.
    I asked him if we would then get billed for the second month if we didn't cancel.
    "Well, yes" was his reply
    I asked him if there was ANY other way he was authorized to "make it up" to us.
    He told me there was nothing else.

    --
    I like microcars
  12. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They do not.

    -Former U-Verse customer who switched to Charter because of U-Verse incompetence when it came to billing and service issues. And nearly left Charter after having to threaten them with harassment charges after five calls about 'promotional services' in three days at work. Free service for a while assuaged me.

  13. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe if it was out for 24h but 3 days, they better give out A LOT better then 1mo of HBO

  14. Whole home party! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do peoples DVR still work or are they watchin the radio tonight?

    Good to have TV Internet and Phone all bungled I mean bundled up like that....

    1. Re:Whole home party! by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm guessing probably not.

      I have U-Verse, and they do a real chickenshit maneuver with the DVR, in that somehow it phones home before it will play any of YOUR LOCAL RECORDED CONTENT. This sucks, I assume it's to make sure you're not a deadbeat before it will play or do anything else but if your internet is out, for whatever reason, you can't even watch your locally recorded shows to fill time until the service returns.

      Did I say that sucks?

      FWIW my service in IL is unaffected, for now, anyway...

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    2. Re:Whole home party! by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I have U-Verse, and they do a real chickenshit maneuver with the DVR, in that somehow it phones home before it will play any of YOUR LOCAL RECORDED CONTENT. This sucks, I assume it's to make sure you're not a deadbeat before it will play or do anything else but if your internet is out, for whatever reason, you can't even watch your locally recorded shows to fill time until the service returns.

      Did I say that sucks?

      Most cablebox DVRs do that as well - they check to make sure you're subscribed to cable first before playing back recorded content. I would guess satellite ones are the same too (except TiVo).

      Third party DVRs like TiVo, Myth, and Windows Media Center, obviously don't have this restriction.

    3. Re:Whole home party! by Snotnose · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter if most DVRs do it, it still sucks. A couple years ago I lost my cable on a thursday, this is when I realized I couldn't watch recorded shows when cable is down). A tech was out friday, spent 10 minutes outside somewhere, my cable worked again. Tech left, 10 minutes later my cable died again. Called em up, as monday was a holiday nobody could come out until next tuesday.

      IMHO, this is bovine manure. It's not my fault the cable went out, nor that the first guy didn't fix it right. I'm paying, I have plenty of stuff recorded, let me watch my danged shows.

      That said, I've been pretty happy with my Uverse. Had Cox when I first moved here, their DVR sucked so hard I returned it after 6 weeks. My ex-wife's Tivo died so she got Time Warner DVR. She lasted 2 weeks before getting Uverse. She's happy with it.

    4. Re:Whole home party! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most cablebox DVRs do that as well - they check to make sure you're subscribed to cable first before playing back recorded content. I would guess satellite ones are the same too (except TiVo).

      My Motorola satellite DVR from Shaw Direct can play back recorded shows while physically disconnected from the dish and the phone line. Now if I could just get my Hauppauge HD-PVR to work for more than a day without rebooting it and my Myth backend, which is also my VM host...

    5. Re:Whole home party! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anon Tier 1.. and you're an idiot. The DVR "phones home" to acquire a DRM certificate because that is how we are able to license content from the content owners (I.e. so that they have the warm and fuzzies about putting their stuff out there on an IP network so it doesn't get pirated enmass) and make it available for home recording. Bitch all you want but if you are on a good loop, which is the key to an exceptional experience with U-Verse, the reason it is so good is because it's a managed network. I remember the days of back orifice on Roadrunner and since you were on the same subnet as 254 other subsçribers, you could port scan the whole subnet and it was hack city. And EVERYONE can STFU about customer service, we are "all hands on deck", working overtime and missing lunches/breaks to help get your service back up so your crops don't die on Farmville.

  15. My over-reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    I had AT&T U-Verse for a year,

    promised 18Bbit I was.

    I rarely got 5Mbit.

    It took 5 technicians to get my connection initially set up.

    I had my line re-provisioned to other customers 3 times.

    I ordered extra static IP addresses, the technician didn't have any of the information, nor did he have any idea what to do with that information.

    SO.... I switched to Comcast Business Class, 50MBit.

    The technician knew what he was doing.

    Everything was set up correctly (technically speaking).

    Haven't had a single issue in 6 months.

    U-Verse is crap, they have no idea what they are doing.

    1. Re:My over-reaction by SoCalChris · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My parents have U-verse at their house, and had a similar experience. It took almost 6 months before the service could even be considered near reliable. Even still, they only get about half of their advertised speed, but it's still the best option where they live. And they don't live out in the boonies, they live on the LA/Orange county border, in a city of over 100k people. I however, DO live out in the boonies (Comparitavely speaking), and have Verizon FIOS with a 150/75Mbit connection, that is consistently the speed that was advertised, and costs less than their U-verse.

      My parents recently had an interesting problem with their service. They kept finding little pools of water near the switch that the U-verse technician installed in their bedroom, with the switch fried. After technicians had replaced their second or third switch, they finally decided to look into what was causing the problem. When the technician ran the original wire (Which went outside of their house), he didn't use outdoor rated cable. After about a year in the sun, it had developed little cracks in the cable jacket, and capillary action was running water from the cracks all the way to the switch.

    2. Re:My over-reaction by adolf · · Score: 2

      When the technician ran the original wire (Which went outside of their house), he didn't use outdoor rated cable. After about a year in the sun, it had developed little cracks in the cable jacket, and capillary action was running water from the cracks all the way to the switch.

      It may not have been the installer's fault. I've seen "outdoor rated" cable fail similarly: I have behind me a multi-$k box which was ruined by some allegedly high-quality, white-jacketed Belden RG6 with "Outdoor" printed on the jacket. After a couple of years of exposure on a rooftop, the jacket turned brittle, cracked, and started turning into dust.

      Which was, you know, pretty surprising to find: I have the rational expectation that when I pay extra for wire that says Belden on it that it will perform as advertised.

      (Lesson learned: Always use black wire outdoors, as the pigmentation alone helps stop UV from reaching so deep, so quickly.)

    3. Re:My over-reaction by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I had DSL from SBC in the early '90s. It worked fine. Unauthenticated DHCP addressing. I moved. New place went out 3-5 days a week. Also required PPPoE before that was commonly available in home routers, so they gave PPPoE software and directions on Windows connection sharing. After months of complaining about the service and such, I got nothing. Then one letter to the FCC (copying the regulatory body and 3 departments of SBC) I had the service fixed within 48 hours of sending the letter (probably before the FCC even received it, certainly before anyone there read it). The dodgey PPPoE software coupled with the bad line made the service unusable, they only needed to fix one and couldn't get that done in 6 months, but fixed both in a day when they decided to do it.

    4. Re:My over-reaction by klui · · Score: 1

      Then they installed it incorrectly. If you create a drip loop and caulk the cable entering the building where it should point downward, this should keep water out.

    5. Re:My over-reaction by adolf · · Score: 1

      Reading comprehension fail.

      Water can travel -through- cables. And as reported by OP, this is exactly what happened. I, myself, cast no doubt upon his observations.

      A drip loop does not, and cannot, prevent the transfer of fluid inside of a cable jacket by wicking, capillary action, or by dissimilar temperatures and pressures.

      A drip loop is formed to shed water that is external to the cable jacket: Water traveling along the outside of the jacket tends to fall off, due to gravity, upon encountering a drip loop. In a perfect world, it works fine.

      But gravity does not keep a candle from burning, nor does it prevent you from swallowing while upside-down. (Also: Heat pipes, and so on.)

      Once the water is inside of the cable jacket (because it is cracked and split), it can do other things that neither a drip loop (nor caulk; WTF?) can prevent.

      (In other news: The underground conduit is full of water. It is flooded simply because it eventually must be unless extraordinary measures are taken. It doesn't matter which conduit it is; it's safer to assume that it is full of water than to assume otherwise, despite the best intentions and practices...which is also why direct-burial cable tends to be flooded with mineral oil that displaces air, such that the air cannot be displaced by water because it does not exist.)

    6. Re:My over-reaction by klui · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with caulk? Siliconized caulk works for me.

      I do admit if the jacket has been compromised it would be a problem only I don't have any experience with damage like the OP talked about. Why would service entrance cables last many years without significant trouble? I'm also curious if black performs better, why is direct bury and UV resistant PVC conduit gray?

    7. Re:My over-reaction by adolf · · Score: 1

      Siliconized caulk only sticks well to clean, dry surfaces. And because it cures (and/or dries, depending on the exact nature of the particular product), it has little tolerance for being disturbed: Once an outside force peels it free, it cannot ever be pushed back into place with any semblance of a seal.

      It's also a pain to deal with: It tends to ruin cloth, it cures in the tube, it sticks to tools, it sucks to get it on your hands, etc. And when it does adhere well long-term, it's a shitty job to try to remove it.

      I like Panduit's incarnation of Duct Seal for most penetrations. It doesn't cure or dry, and can be worked back into shape years later if an outside force requires it. I also use Coax Seal for some stuff, and sometimes butyl rubber in a moldable sheet form (as sold to the satellite TV industry for roof penetrations).

      But RTV silicone? I use that in exactly one wiring application: Penetrations through the roofs of new cop cars. And the only reason I use it there is because of its chemical resistance, and because I have new surfaces to work with, and because Permatex sells it in black. (If any of these variables were different, I'd be using something else.)

      As to PVC conduit: I shouldn't have to say this, but a schedule 40 pipe is a good bit thicker than the average cable jacket. And it does degrade as the outside of it tends to turn powdery and white. So why is it grey instead of black? I'd guess for the same reason that buried plastic natural gas line is orange: It has always been done that way, and so it continues to be done that way.

    8. Re:My over-reaction by klui · · Score: 1

      That's interesting about the Panduit product. Are you referring to this?

      http://www.panduit.com/wcs/Satellite?c=Page&childpagename=Panduit_Global%2FPG_Layout&cid=1345565612156&packedargs=classification_id%3D311%26locale%3Den_us&pagename=PG_Wrapper

      http://www.drillspot.com/products/678579/panduit_ds5_duct_seal_compound?s=1&catargetid=1623454804&gclid=CKzVgYq7hbUCFciDQgodhnUA5g

      and this is Coax Seal?

      http://coaxseal.com/product-informatio http://www.amazon.com/protects-types-cable-moisture-corrosion/dp/B0002ZPINC

      I just looked at my NID installation and just noticed the riser cable is actually exposed outside of the house for around 1 foot before entering the building. The seal used is some sort of paintable silicone. So I need to get some of these products or some sort of UV-stable tubing to protect the homerun. Do you have any experience with Tygon R-3400 tubing? http://www.usplastic.com/catalog/item.aspx?itemid=23409&catid=864

      Thanks for all the info!

    9. Re:My over-reaction by adolf · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's the Panduit stuff. There's other brands of it, too, but that's the one I'm most familiar with. I would be unsurprised if other "Duct Seal" products were exactly the same.

      And that's the correct Coax Seal. It does a somewhat better job than duct seal at sticking to jackets, but it tends to cost more and I can't get it locally (unlike Panduit stuff), so I use it more sparingly.

      No idea on a link for butyl rubber -- I got a good amount of it from a DirecTV installer several years ago when he cleaned out his truck on his last day of work and haven't needed more. ;)

      The tubing you found looks fine (and US Plastics is just down the road from me, though please be aware that the company is owned by God).

      But if it were me and I wanted to wrap it in some manner of tube I'd just use 1/2" flexible nonmetallic PVC conduit. It's normally sold as "Sealtite," and you can buy it by the foot at just about any hardware/electrical/home store.

      It's grey, and it does slowly rot despite being specified for outdoor use, but it's one of those things where the thickness of the material is such that it probably doesn't matter in our lifetimes. And it's UL listed for such applications, so if your house ever burns down the insurance guy can't point at it and go "See what you've done! NOW YOU'RE HOMELESS!"

      Besides, you can always paint it...for that matter, you can paint the bare jacket with outdoor latex paint and keep much of the UV out and probably prolong its existence quite long enough.

      Or (cheapest, perhaps even easiest and best): Since you don't have much length to bother with just give it two wraps of black 3M Super 33+ electrical tape and call it a day. It's the correct material for protecting outdoor aerial splices that are done with cohesive rubber tape, and is the final layer supplied with many underground telco splice kits, and it does not rot (ever, as far as I can tell) in sunlight..

      (Why two wraps? Dunno. But IIRC 3M's instructions say to use two wraps, in opposite directions, oriented so that the final wrap tends to shed water instead of collect it...)

    10. Re:My over-reaction by adolf · · Score: 1

      (Oh. And for the uninitiated: Super 33+ is available everywhere, including Wal-Mart. And as far as I'm concerned, it's the only electrical tape that is worth buying, ever, even though its quite expensive compared to the other stuff on the shelf next to it. Even if I'm going through rolls and rolls of the stuff pulling wires, just to throw the tape away when I'm done, it's all I want to use. Accept no substitutes.)

    11. Re:My over-reaction by klui · · Score: 1

      I appreciate the time you've spent explaining all these alternatives. As for wrapping in 2 directions, this YouTube video shows how to protect a splice using 3M products. They recommend 4 layers of half-lapping to protect the mastic tape.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tsx6im7qng

    12. Re:My over-reaction by klui · · Score: 1

      I can't remember what brand but I think it was 3M. I had an old roll of electrical tape and it was old enough that the vinyl separated from the adhesive when I attempted to use it. Maybe it wasn't the model you recommended. I gave up after trying to unroll around a foot trying to find if the adhesive would fix itself.

  16. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by Bodero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I imagine there isn't a single carrier that offers an SLA for residential customers.

    Become a business customer, however, and they'll offer an SLA - over those very same cables delivering your formerly-residential account (I know, I used to have Road Runner Business Class with the same frequent outages).

    In other words, you get what you pay for. Just like you can buy a First Class ticket with all the amenities of the 'glory days' of flying; every industry is embracing (or exploring) tiers of service.

  17. FTTH..... by h2okies · · Score: 1

    is really the only long term solution that will work (until someone discovers a super fast reliable high density wireless solution). While that is not the cause of the current outage it certainly eliminates a lot of other issues and allows you to focus on the longer term and back haul infrastructure where it should be IMO.

    --
    Beware the Lollipop of Mediocrity, Lick it once and you suck forever.
  18. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's weird. I have Charter in Michigan and it's extremely reliable. I'd say 99.5% uptime if not more. Expensive and always trying to sell me shit I don't need (I DO NOT want VOIP, dammit!) but reliable...

  19. being offered $20 for my inconvenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    My outage in Raleigh, NC is now since 3am Tuesday, going on 36+ hours.
    Did receive an automated phone call telling me that my service was restored, but that proved to be incorrect.
    After 30min wait on hold, I was offered a $20 credit on my account (once service was restored) for my inconvenience.
    It's a shame that the area is a duopoly - TWC isn't high on my trust list after they had a multi day outage around Christmas 2012

  20. It worked better with relays by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the entire history of the Bell System, no electromechanical central office was ever down for more than 30 minutes for any reason other than a natural disaster. Not because the components were reliable, but because the architecture was. If you design high-reliability systems, you should understand the architecture of Number 5 Crossbar.

    1. Re:It worked better with relays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In the entire history of the Bell System, no electromechanical central office was ever down for more than 30 minutes for any reason other than a natural disaster. Not because the components were reliable, but because the architecture was. If you design high-reliability systems, you should understand the architecture of Number 5 Crossbar.

      Bell System designed electronic switches are also very reliable. (1ESS, 5ESS, 4ESS)

      Why did the DOJ break up ma bell??? "Monopoly" was a bullshit excuse. Guess what? We still have a monopoly. (And in some lucky cases, a duopoly or triopoly for landlines data or voice) The baby bells and independents only seek profit, rather than long term investment and innovation.

      We lost Bell Labs and Western Electric thanks to the Gov. :/ Criminal.

    2. Re:It worked better with relays by faedle · · Score: 1

      To be fair, a modern IP network is more complicated than a crosspoint matrix.

    3. Re:It worked better with relays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the data rate of those electromechanical central offices?

    4. Re:It worked better with relays by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Informative

      You've got some real rose-colored glasses there. I remember what else came along with that monopoly reliability:

      -Phones, which you had to rent for decades, wired directly to the wall with no connectors. (That made painting a room into a constant phone shuffle.)
      -Rules against hooking anything but rented telco equipment to the system.
      -Astronomical per-minute costs to dial up grandma in the next state.
      -Switches that were frequently overloaded by too much traffic (fast busy signal). Not technically "down", but frequently unuseable anyway.
      -Zero calling features.

      If the AT&T monopoly were still in place, we'd probably never have gotten internet access at all. Instead, we'd be probably all be stuck using clunky telco-owned terminals like the French Minitel system.

    5. Re:It worked better with relays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I see you're not a geezer, son. It's obvious all you know about the AT&T monopoly is what you read and nothing more. When they broke up Ma Bell, there were only landlines. Not even answering machines. Service was $12.00 a month for local calls only, back when gasoline was thirty cents a gallon and a burger, fries, and coke at McDonalds was forty seven cents. That equates to over $120 a month in today's money, for local phone calls only. And you had to rent the phone from them. And long distance was incredibly expensive. You might want to check out Lilly Tomlin's "Ernestine" on YouTube, it was funny because it was true.

      Bell Labs never went away. There are many replacements for Western Electric. We lost nothing and gained much. There was absolutely no downside whatever from AT&T's breakup. There is no upside to any monopoly, from a customer's point of view.

    6. Re:It worked better with relays by Megane · · Score: 1

      I remember when I worked in New Braunfels, TX in the late '90s. (So SBC, not Bell System.) One day the central office switch went down for a few hours. I don't remember too many details, but I got the idea that some people were really scrambling about it.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    7. Re:It worked better with relays by stox · · Score: 1

      I have pondered this many times over the years. If it weren't for the breakup, we wouldn't have the Internet as we know it, either. We would be cruising along on our 1.5Mb/s PRI ISDN lines by now, for only $100/month plus distance changes.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    8. Re:It worked better with relays by stox · · Score: 1

      That being said, the 5ESS is a marvel of reliability.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    9. Re:It worked better with relays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Southwestern bell was much more reliable and customer friendly. I did not choose at&t, just never changed when they inherited me... Until now! Their high speed internet , u verse , is Horrible

    10. Re:It worked better with relays by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Of course, you could get around those astronomical per-minute costs using nothing more than a whistle from a box of Cap'n Crunch. But doing so could be fairly risky. :)

      But yeah, anyone who thinks AT&T used to be a benevolent monopoly really needs to see the movie The President's Analyst with James Coburn. Yes, that was an over-the-top parody, but man did it ring true* at the time!

      * Pun intended.

    11. Re:It worked better with relays by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      No, no, just wait, the right will claim that it is a conspiracy by the left to create a socialist government run fibre to the home internet by demonstrating the incompetence of corporations when it comes to running critical infrastructure. Heaven forbid that America should resort to an Australian style communistic roll out.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:It worked better with relays by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      The problem wasn't the breakup of Bell. The problem was allowing it to re-aggregate itself, then allowing it to swallow up a major wireless company, multiplied by state legislatures eager to be the new monolith's favorite bitch and show their loyalty by abolishing most of the laws that forced them to be as good as you remember. The AT&T of today isn't the AT&T of 25 years ago. It's not even the BellSouth of 10 years ago.

      The company we now know as AT&T has been caught red-handed, in state after state, using fees state regulators approved 10-20 years ago in the name of fiber deployment to build fiber to THEIR OWN towers, while doing everything possible to let the rest of their network rot into the ground. They don't want to own and operate anything that isn't wireless, except to service their own towers... but they don't want anybody ELSE to own and operate anything that isn't wireless, either.

      The FCC needs to break up AT&T again -- this time, into a wireless company, a "common-carrier last-mile infrastructure" company, and U-verse (leasing copper and fiber from the infrastructure company to provide tv/internet/phone today, and compete with newcomers who'd be able to get the new common-carrier last-mile infrastructure company to lease them fiber on the same wholesale terms as U-verse and AT&T wireless.

    13. Re:It worked better with relays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      must be something to do with the legally-mandated reliability standards of POTS; and why DSL, while slower and itself not covered by those standards, is still usually more reliable than its cable-delivered DOCSIS counterpart - its delivered on same high-reliability lines as voice.

      u-verse (and FIOS, for that matter) is not POTS and therefore not subject to those same high standards, but since it is a multi-content (data, video and voice) delivery technology implemented by an ILEC or CLEC as a replacement for old copper (and typically, a one-way move -- you can't go back to the older technology once you've "upgraded"), it SHOULD BE subject to high-reliability standards of POTS.

      at&t should be raked through the coals by FCC, local PUCs and AGs for this.

    14. Re:It worked better with relays by butlerm · · Score: 1

      That is quite the red herring there. Did the poster say we should restore the AT&T monopoly? No. What he said (in so many words) is that the systems were engineered to such high standards that they never went down.

      The suggestion that we would have to return to monopoly pricing in order for Internet access providers to give reliable service is preposterous. It takes some simple engineering is all. Which the current folks at AT&T (formerly Southeastern Bell) are apparently either incapable of or are prevented from doing. The folks at Comcast and CenturyLink are similar.

      If these quasi-monopoly providers can't deliver basic service that doesn't take large areas down for hours on end, they are inviting government regulation to make them engineer their systems so they don't. Not price regulation, engineering standards regulation.

      Personally, I appreciate it when I cross a bridge and it doesn't collapse under the offered weight. That doesn't seem to be a particularly high priority at most of the monster ISPs these days - quite the opposite. Lets make the most unreliable service we can get away with seems to be the order of the day.

    15. Re:It worked better with relays by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Well the breakup happened in 1987. There were plenty of answering machines back then. Some of us even had voice modems capable of turning your PC into a digital answering machine by then. But yes, I remember when the FCC finally stepped in and told the bells that they HAD to allow third party products to be able to connect to the phone system. Also, not having to rent/buy phones directly from them was a huge change.

      Although, yes, I remember the "Call Packs" for cheap local calls. I also remember when they got rid of them, and they sent out nice little pamphlets telling you how much you would "save". Mine went something like... You paid $12, under our great new program, you would only have paid $998. Yes, each month was just shy of $1000, a savings of nearly $-988.00! Whee. And that was for LOCAL calls. Years later, I was still paying $400-$600 per month in LOCAL calls.

    16. Re:It worked better with relays by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      No, he said that the government breaking up the monopoly was "criminal", because breaking them up is the sole reason we can't match those vaunted uptime figures (which, as I pointed out, didn't necessarily mean that I could actually put a call through). Never mind the fact that modern communications technology is many orders of magnitude more complex and carries millions of times more information than an old-fashioned telephone crossbar switch. "Simple Engineering" fix, my ass.

      The only logical conclusion we can draw from the OP's argument is that it would have been better to leave the monopoly in place, just to achieve the old reliability numbers. In a way, he's correct, because communications technology under a monopoly would have been decades behind current levels, and therefore much simpler. I simply pointed out what else that would entail.

    17. Re:It worked better with relays by butlerm · · Score: 1

      No, he said that the government breaking up the monopoly was "criminal"

      I guess that is why one should quote a line or two of the comment he or she is responding to. The one you were actually responding to was hidden.

      And when I say "simple engineering", I mean standard engineering practice. No one in his right mind designs a mission critical system for tens of thousands of people without full redundancy and usually automatic failover as well. A system that size that goes down for more than five minutes is more likely to be the result of engineering malpractice than anything else.

      I still have a traditional land line, because it is reliable. I can't remember ever picking it the phone up and not having a dial tone. That would most definitely not be the case with any other kind of service available to residences and small businesses. The PSTN was designed to be reliable, and the people who designed readily available Internet access service designed it by the same standards that one might use for toys. Entertainment devices.

      No one cares very much if they can't watch I Love Lucy for a couple of hours, although every television station I am aware of is about three orders of magnitude more reliable than the DSL / cable monopolies as well, if not quite as reliable as the PSTN.

    18. Re:It worked better with relays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Present discussion notwithstanding, in my particular duopoly area (ATT/TW) I've always felt that some of that DNA is still hanging around somewhere in the bloated mass that is ATT.

      Someone pointed out above that ATT wants the same price for 3mbit that comcast wants for 6, with TV. It's the "with TV" part that rules out TW for me. When I bought my current residence (late 2010), and got u-verse due to being out of dsl range, ATT and TW wanted the same price for 6mbit service ($35/mo). TW assumed TV service bundled, ATT did not. The same 6mbit from TW without TV service was $55/mo.

      So essentially ATT is my only choice for high speed internet. I've been lucky enough to not have a single outage since I've had it, which mirrors my ~10yr experience with their DSL, which went down for a grand total of perhaps 4-5 hours in that period. Most people I know with TW pretty much *expect* a few non-trivial outages a year. Maybe it's just my local area, but it seems that ATT's "boots on the ground" are much better trained, more knowledgeable, and more responsive. That may have a lot to do with them being actual ATT employees and not the contractors TW uses (I interact with a lot of different internet connections and users locally).

      Basically it seems to me that some primordial fragment of ATT still considers itself an infrastructure provider, whereas TW at heart is a provider of an optional luxury. My experience has been that this difference in DNA is noticeable if you're paying attention.

      *Note - I still despise ATT*

  21. INFORMATION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    --- anonymous uverse tech
    This is whats going on, any new gateway or exisiting gateway that is restarted will not be able to obtain service. The DHCP servers are overloaded and over capacity, CMS has disabled their northbound API so no provisioning can get thru in order to lessen the load.
    Its not affecting everyone in the affected areas, and as a precaution NO ONE should attempt to powercycle or reset their gateway for any reason.

    1. Re:INFORMATION by zjbs14 · · Score: 1

      as a precaution NO ONE should attempt to powercycle or reset their gateway for any reason.

      Which is fine until your existing lease expires at which point you're SOL (like me). I've also heard that they're trying to reduce load by dropping MTU sizes which is preventing things like Netflix and XBox Live from working for people who actually still have connections. Of course that's just making things even worse from a customer service perspective. Any clues on what the triggering event was?

      --
      No sig, sorry.
    2. Re:INFORMATION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably related to the absurd amount of overselling AT&T does. In my apartment complex on the edge of Atlanta, GA, they're the worst in terms of selling more capacity then they have. So all it takes is one failure at a critical point, then a mass cascade outwards as your DR points to areas without the capacity.

    3. Re:INFORMATION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure how reducing the MTU size would affect IP address depletion of a DHCP server. Sounds like an address exhaustion problem, not a data plane problem. At 50% of your lease duration your router should just renew your existing lease, not request a new one. You should be fine. Also Uverse uses essentially permanent addresses leases of long duration (weeks) in my area. I've had the same global IP address since I had the service installed, even persisting through long local power outages and many power cycles of the equipment.

      -Anonymous AT&T sr network engineer (not part of Uverse)

    4. Re:INFORMATION by minijedimaster · · Score: 1

      --- anonymous uverse tech This is whats going on, any new gateway or exisiting gateway that is restarted will not be able to obtain service. The DHCP servers are overloaded and over capacity, CMS has disabled their northbound API so no provisioning can get thru in order to lessen the load. Its not affecting everyone in the affected areas, and as a precaution NO ONE should attempt to powercycle or reset their gateway for any reason.

      LOL, I bet Level 1 tech scripts are really useful now. Sir, have you rebooted your router? Please reboot your router, awwww

    5. Re:INFORMATION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another Anon ATT employee. What another poster said is correct, ATT does not want to maintain its on network. Our fearless leader said in one of his releases this week that we are moving away from wired services, and that everything in the future will be based on our wireless network, which of course is easier to maintain, but has limitations. We are overpriced and quite honestly, UVERSE is a shitty product designed in 2002...

    6. Re:INFORMATION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I called the uverse customer service line yesterday at 5:00 pm central time,there was a recording on that said service in my area had been restored. It went on to say that if our service was not up that we should unplug our uverse box and then plug it back in after 20 seconds. So foes this mean that my service will never be restored?!!!!!

    7. Re:INFORMATION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want some real fun, try getting your 25/2 line reprovisioned to the 32/5 profile. It's like playing Dragon's Lair -- move the joystick, go through the motions at the right instant in the right order, and if you're lucky... each attempt will take you one step further before you die and have to start over again.

      I'd call, humor tier 1, get transferred to tier 2, chat for a minute or two, then sit on hold for 10-30 minutes while the tier 2 rep fought with someone in sales (because only sales could authorize dispatching a prem tech). The prem tech's only job was to show up, realize there was nothing for him to do, call back, and ask them to open a buddy ticket to dispatch the lineman. HOWEVER, 5-20 minutes after the prem tech left, AT&T's CMS system would have someone call to try and trick me into giving them an answer that would allow them to mark the ticket as closed, auto-cancelling the lineman and leaving me back at square 1.

      The first time it happened, I walked straight into their trap; the second time, the CSR still managed to trick me (she asked whether my service "was working", I said "yes" without realizing I was being trapped, and she closed the ticket before I could protest... then said the system didn't allow it to be undone. Arrrrrrrgh. Prem Tech #3 told me that they always do that, and to just hang up without apologizing or saying anything if I got a call from quality assurance before they were totally 100% done.

      I *was* told by someone on another forum (not an AT&T employee) that AT&T *hates* letting people get Max Turbo, and will go so far as to go to the trouble of upgrading your service to 32/5 profile, then "forget" to upgrade your service to 24/3 Max Turbo after it's done. He said that the way AT&T provisions its fiber, the upstream bandwidth is rigidly set to 1.5mbps per customer for the VRAD... so if somebody gets Max Turbo, the provisioning system counts it as two users, and reduces the number of slots they can use by two instead of one. Apparently, it comes back to AT&T's disdain for capital expenditures... they don't want to build more VRADs to accommodate half as many users, but they also don't want to reprovision the fiber to accommodate more high-speed users with a single VRAD. They want to have their cake & eat it too... advertising higher speeds, but doing their best to avoid letting anyone actually HAVE them.

      That said... 24/3 rocks, and was totally worth the fight I had to go through to get it. In real life, for uses besides web surfing popular sites and content mirrored locally by Akamai (ie, RDP to Asia, peer-to-peer file transfers, etc), U-verse Max Turbo completely *spanks* Comcast 50/6. Comcast's local network connectivity is blisteringly fast, but their actual connectivity to the outside world sucks... especially if you're trying to connect to hosts outside the US. AT&T's local loop speeds are lower, but they have solid upstream connectivity to back it up.

    8. Re:INFORMATION by sjames · · Score: 1

      That's what happens when you let the bean counters determine the 'appropriate' system load. Add in the 'enterprise' habit of wanting central control when it's actually easier to distribute services and you get debacles like this.

  22. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    I only use UVerse for TV....but it is still up and working (so far) in the south of LA (New Orleans area).

    I use cable for my business internet account....but picked UVerse awhile back in that compared to cable and both satellite packages with full house DVR, they were the cheapest and had by far the most HD channels for the buck.

    That was a couple years ago, I guess I should shop around again to see what's out there, but so far, service and uptime has been quite good!! Even after hurricane Issac, when I get home from evac, it was up and running just fine.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  23. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ah yes. tigerdirect.com is notorious for this. Call up, complain, get it fixed, then "We would like to offer you a free copy of x", which is actually a subscription auto-billed to your credit card. They will only take a hang up as an affirmative no. I started just paying the few bucks for newegg.com

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  24. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by Amouth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    years ago (10+) when you signed up for Business Class Road Runner they had a policy that you couldn't share a node (meaning that they couldn't just bill you different but it required a dedicated run). So when i moved into a new house i signed up for Business Class with no long term contract (yes it was expensive that way) but after they installed it and ran it for a month i canceled and then switched to residential. They are lazy and din't move me off the dedicated node.. so for 8 years i had residential service with business level of service.

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  25. Choose 2, Fast, Reliable, Cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Telecom chose Reliable (fast might be a bit of a strech) and as such had fewer outages. But the labor necessary to accomplish this and the cost (anyone remember 200+ long distance bills)? associated with this was the reason.

    Telecos could afford to keep things reliable, since they had a monoploly, and a stranglehold on bandwidth. If ma bell were still around we would be paying $1,000 for a t1. Everyone likes to complain, but its something of a minor miracle that I can have almost a ds3 for $70.00/month.

    Thats not to defend uverse, but its often easy to forget why the 'its not reliable as ...' Since we have 'fast, and 'cheap'.

    Thomas

    1. Re:Choose 2, Fast, Reliable, Cheap by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but then people are going to point out that services like Verzion FiOS are more reliable, faster, and cheaper. Municipal Broadband efforts tend to be even better than that. This is more about AT&T being greedy and incompetent.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Choose 2, Fast, Reliable, Cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not totally wrong, but it's more like a variant of Gresham's law (bad driving out good). The harder you try to wring out every last drop of "inefficiency", the more expensive reliability becomes for everyone else, until the only people left with reliable service are those who can afford to spend astronomical amounts of money for it. Five-nines reliability isn't "efficient" from the standpoint of a company that can externalize its opportunity costs (ie, if the cost to AT&T of not providing service to someone who spends $60/month for service is at most $2/day, it's cheaper for them to just let it fail once or twice a year and rebate back the $2-4 instead of spending the $10 it might cost to reduce the downtime to just a random hour or two per year). On the other hand, to a business that makes several thousand dollars per hour, and sees its income drop to nothing when it loses connectivity, the idea that the lost service is worth $2 per day is completely absurd. It's the same problem people in Florida have with the power company. It's cheaper for FPL to just let people go without power for weeks at a time after a hurricane every year or three than to spend the cash to bury neighborhood lines, then pass along the cost spread out over 25 years.

      AT&T could easily amortize the cost of fiber over 25 years. The problem is, like FPL in Florida, American businesses are loath to spend capital on anything without immediate payoff... and equally loath to allow fed up governments to do it themselves instead. They don't want to provide the service, but they don't want anybody ELSE to be allowed to do it, either.

      Up until about 5 years ago, the FCC's tacit compromise was to recognize that communities should have two broadband companies... one that's not necessarily cheap or fast, but is very reliable (DSL) and available nearly everywhere (POTS/ISDN/IDSL)... and one that's allowed to be unreliable & cherry-pick, and be fast or cheap as it saw fit (cable). Unfortunately, some idiot got the insane idea that going a step further and freeing "the company traditionally known as 'the phone company'" from its obligations to be reliable and serve everyone, and now we have a de-facto duopoly of two companies doing their best to be as unreliable as possible -- one by design and intent (cable), and one by neglect and decay (AT&T). Instead of allowing AT&T to act like a 1970s freight railroad and run its infrastructure into the ground as it rotted, the FCC should have told AT&T to go lay fiber -- or sell their right-of-way to someone who will.

    3. Re:Choose 2, Fast, Reliable, Cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FPL is in a bit of a 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' situation with the land in Florida.

      In many places, if they bury the line deep enough that a good storm won't 'float' the cable out of the ground, they're burying it *in* the water table, which will cause its own, *less* easily predicted, and more expensive to fix problems. So they keep the lines on poles, because at least then its *obvious* when a storm takes out a section of line.

    4. Re:Choose 2, Fast, Reliable, Cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Florida's water table is overrated. Some places, like South Beach, are geologically drier and more stable than most of Manhattan & Chicago. People in Ohio and Michigan have bigger problems with groundwater than people in Florida do, but they have basements there anyway. The difference is, in Ohio & Michigan, you HAVE to dig a 3-5 foot hole for the foundation, so you might as well make it a few feet deeper and turn it into semi-useful slightly-damp indoor storage space for junk and laundry. In Florida, you'll hit limestone bedrock within a few inches of the surface and have to blast or jackhammer every foot of basement away, so you'll end up paying a lot more to get lower-quality living space.

      Even in areas below sea level, dry-floodproofing via bulkhead doors isn't rocket science. There are buildings all over Houston with swing-up bulkhead doors to keep their underground garages from flooding when the street itself gets submerged under a foot or two of standing water. You just have to make sure that it's either anchored with cables to the bedrock, or has a few hundred million tons of skyscraper sitting above it to weight it down, and use concrete strong enough to not crack under stress from the water. It's expensive, but they do it anyway. Let's not forget the ultimate gigantic manmade underground concrete structure... one that literally had to hold back the weight of the HUDSON RIVER a few hundred feet away (the WTC's "bathtub"). Nor, for that matter, half the underground subway stations in Washington DC, Chicago, and New York. Miami could easily run Metrorail out to South Beach in a pair of bored tunnels if it had the money... it would just have to make sure that any and all surface openings could be made watertight so it wouldn't flood when storm surge from a major hurricane submerges the entire island under at least an inch or two of floodwater.

  26. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I had famvid dialup in the '90s, there was a one day outage, they gave me the whole month free.

  27. That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I've been offline from UVerse for 15 days now. They're trying to fix it, but MAN this is taking forever!

    1. Re:That's nothing... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      you think that is bad, I had just converted my service to U-verse from a old style ATT dsl acct, and this outage hit the day it was suppose to switch over and be active.
      so much for un-interrupted service.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    2. Re:That's nothing... by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is, they probably stopped routing your DSL connection all the way to the central office, but connected it at the same sidewalk DSLAM box that your U-verse connects at. You've had a "classic" DSL connection that could achieve U-verse speeds, which they just wouldn't give it to you unless you paid for the conversion.

  28. Comcast by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

    I never thought in a million years that I'd say I love Comcast, but I do.

    My business class connection through them has been rock solid without major issues for over two years. Other than lightning frying the modem once but they were out within hours with a replacement.

    AT&T U-Verse can go pound sand as far as I'm concerned.

    1. Re:Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never thought in a million years that I'd say I love Comcast, but I do.

      My business class connection through them has been rock solid without major issues for over two years. Other than lightning frying the modem once but they were out within hours with a replacement.

      AT&T U-Verse can go pound sand as far as I'm concerned.

      Yeah, and u-Verse has been rock solid for me for 3+ years until this outage. Your point being? I used to have Comcast (Or Xfinity as they call themselves now) before u-Verse and I never been happier with the switch. Comcast's TV service just blows

      But basically, there is no "always working" solution. Things breaks and if they aren't on top of things, this is what happens. Comcast has experienced outage before as well.

    2. Re:Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you want to buy my anti-tiger rock?
       
      My residential class UVerse internet connection has been rock solid without major issues for over three years (seems unaffected by this outage, too).

  29. Uverse Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AT&T knows TV over DSL will never work properly, but they keep scamming the customers with that cr*ppy service.

    1. Re:Uverse Scam by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      Their TV-over-DSL has worked great for us for the last five years. It's their ToS that sucks.

  30. Well there's the problem: by Skapare · · Score: 1

    all from a single fiber optic cable

    They obviously need a 2nd fiber optic cable, now

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  31. I can haz ip address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rumor going around our garage is that they are running out of ip addresses. This his there California for the last 3 weeks, 2 places in the south and has spread further out. We went told what the issue was or when it was "solved", lots of finger pointing going around.

  32. DHCP lease file blown away? by mveloso · · Score: 1

    It sounds like someone blew away their DHCP lease file by mistake...so DHCP is assigning addresses that are already in use. Was there an upgrade over the weekend?

    If that's the case, the only way to get around it is to query all the DSLAMs and rebuild the current lease file by hand.

    Sucks to be them.

    1. Re:DHCP lease file blown away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait a minute, so their customer-facing equipment doesn't do any anti-IP-spoofing filtering? I'd have thought that if you're assigned a certain address and try to send out something not using that address, the traffic doesn't leave your premises. What you describe is a situation where there's no source IP filtering at all. That's a disaster that waited to happen, and it now has.

    2. Re:DHCP lease file blown away? by mveloso · · Score: 1

      Well, you're talking about something else.

      A DHCP server generally keeps track of the leases that it sends out, and that file tends to be on-disk.

      Ahe DHCP server can also be configured to check to see if the address is in use before assigning it...usually via a ping, arp, etc. That's just as likely to be turned off, because it's expensive and sort of redundant.

      So...if that file is blown away during an upgrade, well, the DHCP server knows its range, and it'll just start assigning addresses.

      A DHCP server upgrade seems likely, as the problem started over the weekend...and this is a problem that wouldn't be caught during the acceptance test unless you were really lucky.

    3. Re:DHCP lease file blown away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I remember, Motorola's SurfBoard2 pre-DOCSIS cable modems and back-end routers had a HUGE problem with this. Conceptually, they were just an ethernet bridge, and did nothing to stop you from using the same IP address as somebody else. In fact, if you intentionally (or accidentally) booted up your PC with the same IP address as the router, you could literally take down your entire node for 5-30 minutes (until someone realized you were doing it, and manually went in to figure out who the idiot was who set his PC to the same address as the router).

    4. Re:DHCP lease file blown away? by mike.mondy · · Score: 1

      Good grief. I was on U-Verse briefly in 2008 or 2009 in Houston. We had an outage that IIRC lasted a few days. I don't recall the exact details, but I think it was some sort of DHCP server issue. In addition to apparently not having an architecture that where possible limits the scope of issues to something less than multiple states, it sounds like they haven't even learned from past problems.

    5. Re:DHCP lease file blown away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, they've LEARNED from their mistakes. They just aren't allowed to put that knowledge to use and spend any money doing anything about it, because AT&T's senior management doesn't give a shit about anything besides wireless (and fiber directly serving their wireless towers) anymore.

    6. Re:DHCP lease file blown away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Upgrade or what not - they in some manner hosed their DHCP server via upgrade, disk crash, - more than the lease data was lost - I suspect they have also lost the entire DHCP Supernet/SubNet definitions on one of one(or many clustered) DHCP servers and they are now out of sync and or gone. So they are being hit by a double issue - they have to rebuild their subnet assignments manually while at the same time they are being over-taxed with repetetive DHCP requests as people are requesting over and over again; including reboots. Telling people to reboot, as they have, only amplifies this problem.

      I'm still struggling with the issue of seemingly close clients having differing experiences. It is possible they are on differnet subnets served by different DHCP servers.

      The fact that they are bringing Texas online at this moment sort of indicates they are rebuilding 'region' by 'region' and makes me more inclined to think that they completed hosed a DHCP server and had no viable restores available.

  33. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by Megane · · Score: 2

    I'm wondering how they can get away with that kind of an outage for the voice service. As in, you know, not even being able to dial 911?

    They built out the node about 500 feet from my house two years before even starting to offer U-verse. At that range, VDSL2+ can reach 50Mb/sec or more. I thought that could be nice. Once I saw that they seemed to care more about selling cable TV (I watch plenty with an antenna these days) and voice service (I'll stick with my reliable POTS line, TYVM), I was less interested. When I found out that they put some kind of digital certificate inside the modem where you can't just drop in another modem when yours flakes out (which I have done plenty of times with DSL), I was even less interested. (Though I will admit it may have something to do with preventing you from usurping someone else's voice connection with stored credentials.)

    I've got old-school 6Mbit bridged-Ethernet DSL with fixed IP through them, and although I would like something faster and cheaper, it's solid. The only time in over 10 years that it went out was when they apparently (my best guess) bricked the remote terminal node in a botched firmware update and had to get a replacement shipped in. Every other problem lasting more than 15 minutes or so has been due to the CPE modem, and I can get replacements for $5 or so at thrift stores.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  34. AT&T U-Verse has always been unreliable by quietwalker · · Score: 1

    I switched to U-Verse when they had a switch-discount program, but only for about a month. The problem was that nothing worked.

    I actually wrote a program to track when I was connected. In a 3 day period, I had around 200 outages, each requiring between 3-5 minutes before the connection was regained. I literally could not use it to work from home - the time required to perform the VPN connection, get back to the machine I needed to use, and get back to work was just barely shorter than the average uptime.

    I reported and had techs out to fix this problem on 3 separate instances, and in each case the techs found a new problem, and blamed it on the incompetence of the previous tech. Then it would work more or less well for about an hour, before having the same problems again. Despite not being able to provide me with phone, tv, or internet service in a usable form for over a month, they refused to refund any money, and only offered to credit us for free months of their non-working service.

    Switched to Time Warner who not only gave me a better deal for switching, but credited me with a free month to make up for U-Verse not doing it. Not that their random downtimes and slower-than-advertised-speeds-most-of-the-time are as well appreciated, nor their apparent throttling high-usage systems by mac address - at least in the Austin area - but at least the damn thing works.

    1. Re:AT&T U-Verse has always been unreliable by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      U-verse over 3k (possibly shorter if it's old copper) wire feet is generally a bad idea no matter what they tell you. My U-verse has worked flawlessly, but I'm only 1.2k wire feet away. There's only so much you can do with old copper pairs.

      --
      this is my sig
    2. Re:AT&T U-Verse has always been unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you might have had a firewall blocking two ports that are required to extend a DHCP lease. I had this same problem when using a router behind their router. U-Verse techs couldn't help, but I found the solution in the DD-WRT forums.

    3. Re:AT&T U-Verse has always been unreliable by klui · · Score: 1

      I've been told by techs that U-verse needs a homerun to the modem and if you have any daisy-chained/star configuration it is asking for trouble. The other is a twisted pair--no four-strand or ribbon wiring--is highly recommended to get a good signal.

  35. WOW by mjh2901 · · Score: 1

    Despite the hate for ATT corperate, they have some extremely good engineers who are either scratching there heads or totally freaking out.

    1. Re:WOW by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter how competent your engineers are (Xerox PARC, Bell Labs) if your management is a bunch of idiots.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  36. One cable operator got sued for that in the 90's by big_e_1977 · · Score: 1

    Back in the early 90's when Encore launched, TCI cablevision pulled a similar stunt. This is back in the day when pay TV was controlled by signal traps on the service drops and changing programming packages required a truck roll. TCI simply added the channel to its system and told all its subscribers that the first month was free and if you don't opt out you will be charged the monthly subscription fee. To make matters worse, you also had to pay the service fee for the truck roll to add the filter.

    That plan didn't go over so well and TCI got sued by the attorney generals in multiple states.

  37. TX: Power just dropped for 30 sec by Pitawg · · Score: 1

    Uverse has been up for me. Power cycled. Took over 30 minutes for the connection between modem and ATT. I have a static IP so once the main connection is up and talking, all was well again.

  38. Re:One cable operator got sued for that in the 90' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    attorney generals

    Attorney generals: presumably multiple generals in the army of attorneys.

    Attorneys general: the correct way to say what you were trying to say (more than one attorney general). The noun is made plural, not the adjective.

  39. Out in Little Rock, Ar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Out in Little Rock, Ar for more than a day now. At first I thought it had something to do with recently changing how my autodraft was done. Kindof relieved that everyone is having problems with it. Also, it sounds like they have no idea what the problem is.

  40. Uverse fine for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have enjoyed my uverse service and it isn't down for me. I had it at an older house too and it was fine there. My current house has fiber as well. It is expensive however.

  41. Please stand by. by CrAlt · · Score: 2

    The NSA cable switchover is causing some problems. Hold tight-- your phone, internet, and wireless communications will be 100% monitored by the NSA again very soon.

    --
    I have to return some videotapes...
  42. Site to site VPN tunnels don't work either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have static IPs and use that for site to site VPN to my colocation facility. I am running Cisco ASA (software 8.4) on both sides, and it took my Cisco engineer and myself two days to figure out why I can ping my servers across the tunnel but can't do anything more useful than that. Finally we tested for MTU issues which then were confirmed by discussions like this. My MTU as of 1/23 6PM ET is still somewhere in the 500 range, not to mention terrible packet loss and high latency. I just signed a contract for TW Business Class, so I am voting with my money.

  43. No complaints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't had any complaints in Mississippi, and I do IT work for hundreds of clients. I also personally have U-Verse. Hmmm?

  44. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by gmanterry · · Score: 1

    yes they should. lets just enable it on everyones bill and make the first month free.

    turn an outage into a marketing strategy.

    That's what DirecTV does. They give you everything but fails to tell you that you need to cancel the extras. They also tell you that unless you give them a credit card to bill directly (pun intended) they will charge you more. So unless you are aware and paying attention, they screw you out of a month or two of high dollar TV. And you need to really pay attention. Come football season you'll suddenly be charged another $60.00 / month for football coverage you didn't order. It's all a scam. There isn't an honest one out there.

    --
    Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
  45. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by adolf · · Score: 1

    That was a couple years ago, I guess I should shop around again to see what's out there, but so far, service and uptime has been quite good!! Even after hurricane Issac, when I get home from evac, it was up and running just fine.

    Indeed. We had a quite bad storm back in June and were without power for a week (and we were lucky to get it back so soon), but U-Verse never skipped a beat. They rolled in a swarm of generators to keep their VRAD boxes going.

  46. The two happiest days... by lophophore · · Score: 1

    The two happiest days of a uverse user:

    2nd happiest: the day they get it installed.
    happiest: the day they get real cable.

    I had uverse service for 10 days -- 9 days too long. Utter crap. The TV would not stay working, and when it did, the dolby digital would spuriously drop out. Internet? Even worse. crazy amounts of jitter -- when it worked -- which was not that often.

    AT&T was unwilling to reconnect my 6 MB conventional DSL after this fiasco, so I advised them to go fuck themselves and took their wire off my house and buried it in the yard.

    Comcast is expensive, expensive, but their customer service made AT&T's look bad (which is pretty remarkable.) I get 20+ MB/sec download speeds from them, regardless of how much TV is being watched.

    Never again.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  47. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by adolf · · Score: 1

    The only time I thought I needed new CPE gear with U-Verse, I had a technician at my house within a couple of hours with a new box. Late. On a Saturday.

    And then it turned out to be a cabling issue a few hundred feet out, which he fixed.

    Having spare gear on-hand is nice and all, but if it means having 6Mbit DSL instead of 12 or 18Mbit VDSL, I'll take the latter.

    And if it breaks for some reason, I can always tether my phone, or use "Linksys" or "NETGEAR" in the interim.

    *shrug*

  48. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by mjwx · · Score: 1

    Ah yes. tigerdirect.com is notorious for this. Call up, complain, get it fixed, then "We would like to offer you a free copy of x", which is actually a subscription auto-billed to your credit card. They will only take a hang up as an affirmative no. I started just paying the few bucks for newegg.com

    This is why you dont accept free shit instead of having them fix your problem.

    I used to have a housemate who had a constant problem with the handset Optus (Australian Telco) sold to her. She was on Pre-Paid (Pay As You Go) so she paid for the handset outright. Every month she'd ring up and complain, every month they'd offer her $10 credit to get her off the phone and every month I'd ask "but did they fix your problem". She didn't get it and continued to get constant call disconnections.

    Companies offer free shit because it's easier than fixing the problem. When you take the free shit, you give them a free pass not to fix the problem.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  49. and I thought Time Warner internet had problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I switched to ATT uVerse 2 months ago. In those 2 months I have constant installation/product problems.
    2 different Taps were found two weeks apart ... the Taps were 36 inches apart and both time required a 3ft by 8 ft ditch to be dug up.
    My NID (the outside the house box) has been replaced once
    My backup battery ... inside the house ... died and had to be replaced.
    My Access Point/Wireless router inside the house - even before this outage - started to lose both the "broadband" and "service" LEDs every morning
    and to bring it back online with the outside NID (the dsl modem) I had reboot the battery by pressing into the Red PinHole on the left of the battery.
    They still can't explain the online/offline problem after maybe 5-6 diff tech visits.

    Now this 3 day total outage that according to ATT and to the Techs I talk to is more or less Nationwide.

    How can they call themselves a Service Provider ??? They have the Battery Backup so in the case of power outages you can still make phone calls... but with this outage there is NO service - Voice/Video/Data ... all out.

    I wonder how many 911 call attempts have been tried and failed. How many people have to die from a Heart Attack, gunshot, fire?

    Cell Phone doesn't have 911 location ability yet for most carriers. So if you've been in a bad car accident ... you better know where to tell the 911 operator your location to get the ambulance there !!

    I'm absolutely amazed this hasn't been on CNN yet...

    1. Re:and I thought Time Warner internet had problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your bad experience wasn't typical, but probably IS common for people who are in neighborhoods with old wiring that are more than ~1,000 feet away from the VRAD. They SHOULD have tried swapping you to a different pair, swapping your line card at the VRAD, and (if all else failed) bonded two pairs so that each pair carried only half the data. VDSL2 in a neighborhood with old wires isn't plug & play, but it's rare for AT&T to be unable to eventually get someone who's within ~1,500 feet to work reliably. Or at least it WAS, before its senior management clamped down and restricted what they could do to make a line work before AT&T just wrote you off and decided you weren't profitable enough to bother with.

      In neighborhoods where AT&T went to the trouble of laying brand new cables (like mine), it works quite well. According to the benchmarks the lineman ran on my line, it has plenty of headroom to take me up to ~50mbps without breaking a sweat, and maybe 60mbps with more aggressive forward error correction and interleaving.

      Of course, you can (like I did) question the sanity of burying brand new bundles of cat3 copper instead of... well... fiber... My guess is that AT&T had a shitload of copper cable on spools in warehouses that they already bought & accounted for in some past fiscal year, but would have had to pay for new fiber now, so under the slightly fucked up way American businesses work, it was "cheaper" for them to bury brand new expensive copper (the break-even point is basically 6 pairs... more than that, and fiber is actually cheaper per foot because copper is so expensive now) that's technically "free" (because they already counted it against some past quarter's profits) than it would have been to buy new cheap fiber and bury it instead.

      Of course, they'll probably have to dig it up and bury fiber in 10-20 years anyway, but they can't see past the next quarter's profits, and by the time AT&T's stock price crashes because they've ceased to be competitive against everyone else, its current senior management will have wrung the company's equity dry, cashed out their stock options, & sold the shares anyway. It's the American Way(tm). You know, freedom from evil socialistic municipal fiber, liberty, patriots, guns, Jesus, and shit like that...

  50. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Y'know normally I'd say that's a slimy maneuver, and recoil in disgust.

    But reading it the second time I caught the Road Runner mention and reflexively did a fist pump.

    Glad no one was in the room to see it except my dog.

    But it's ok because he hates Time Warner more than I do.

  51. AT&T U-Verse is a rip-off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After having their service for two years and constantly seeing an increase in my bill over the years, I finally decided to return to Comcast...Comcast has their problems but unreliability isn't one of them....

  52. Finally one of the 1% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm so honored! 48 hours offline in suburban Atlanta.

    Wait? How am I posting?? Thanks to a good old Verizon wifi hotspot my employer gave me!

    Verizon or AT&T? Who shall I choose next.

    p.s. I'd call to cancel my Uverse, but I can't get through!

  53. Worst customer service award by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    San Antonio tx- my uverse Internet still out. The automated man keeps telling me to reboot my computer but I'm beginning to doubt his technical skills.....

  54. Re:One cable operator got sued for that in the 90' by mosherkl · · Score: 2

    Actually, according to Miriam-Webster, either attorneys general OR attorney generals is the acceptable plurality.

    The noun can be considered both words together in this case.

  55. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by general_re · · Score: 1

    I used to have a housemate who had a constant problem with the handset Optus (Australian Telco) sold to her. She was on Pre-Paid (Pay As You Go) so she paid for the handset outright. Every month she'd ring up and complain, every month they'd offer her $10 credit to get her off the phone and every month I'd ask "but did they fix your problem". She didn't get it and continued to get constant call disconnections.

    Companies offer free shit because it's easier than fixing the problem. When you take the free shit, you give them a free pass not to fix the problem.

    The other side of the coin is that there are plenty of people who call to complain, but don't really want the "issue" fixed, because they don't actually consider it to be all that serious of a problem. They'd rather just use it as leverage to get free shit.

    --
    ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
  56. WTF? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    ATT advertises bundles starting at $59 a month on its website, stating, “U-verse delivers television, phone and Internet services — all from a single fiber optic cable at the speed of light.

    On what planet? Because here on Earth they use phone lines and DSL for everything. I wouldn't be surprised if AT&T hasn't laid 1 foot of fiber anywhere in the US. That's what Time Warner does, not them.

    1. Re:WTF? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      AT&T has laid a super crapload of fiber all over the US. They were the first to bring fiber nearly everywhere and in many places have the only fiber into a county or other locality. Lake County, California is one of those places. AT&T has literally the only fiber link in and out, which runs along the 20 in both directions. The local WISP brings in cogent from wireless links across four mountaintops to avoid using them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  57. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    The other side of the coin is that there are plenty of people who call to complain, but don't really want the "issue" fixed, because they don't actually consider it to be all that serious of a problem. They'd rather just use it as leverage to get free shit.

    Sounds like a win-win for the companies.

  58. AT&T U-verse outage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am asking all to copy and paste the following and email your congress person.
    Dear Mr Congressman, I am respectfully requesting you to look into the service outage of AT&T U-verse from 1/21/2013 to 1/24/2013. The fact of the matter is that during the outage no one affected had the ability to call 911 if warranted. This should make it mandatory for AT&T to report the true number of customers affected. It is my opinion that AT&T is underestimating the number of customers affected. Also the fact that AT&T was not putting out timely information as to the problem or a time table for repairs.

    Read more here: http://www.thestate.com/2013/01/24/2602689/atts-u-verse-outage-leaves-thousands.html#storylink=cpy

  59. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you ever order from tigerdirect instead of new egg in the first place?!?! Lol

  60. Spokeswoman Claims Outage Affects Less Than 1% by Aoverify · · Score: 1

    According to statements made to CNN by an AT&T spokesperson, the outage was caused by "a software upgrade".
    She went on to say the outage "only hit a limited number of customers". Well DUH! If 1 customer is still online and 99.99% of your customers have an outage, thats still a limited number of customers. I love how corporations have these spindoctors who make vague, noncomittal statements that really provide no information.

    http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/24/tech/web/uverse-outage-att/

  61. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by zipn00b · · Score: 1

    I had a commercial Road Runner account while living in an apartment back when T1 lines were the big business lines at around $2000 a month. I was paying more like $150 a month for guaranteed 1Meg/768K. Like your setup at that time the node wasn't shared and I had the only commercial connection in the complex. If a site I was connected to supported it my download speed was limited to the 10Meg port on my router.... :)

  62. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    You should be more careful about writing things and try to make them more factual. If Directv give you something and never told you that you had to pay for extras, then when they charge you for extras, you simply call them up and tell them to explain why you're being billed for something they never disclosed to you. When they can't, demand they remove the charge and if they don't, take them to small claims court and get the judge to remove it for them. To me it sounds like what you're actually saying is directv gave you a 20 page contract which you signed without reading, and you're now upset with them for acting exactly how they said they would in the contract that you didn't read. In this case, this is not a scam, it's a failure to read and understand how contracts and the legal system work.

  63. Re:They should give people 1mo free HBO to make up by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    You just described me. If there is a way to get free shit in exchange for spending 30 minutes on the phone complaining, sign me up for it.