Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Use Lasers For Cooling

MatthewVD writes "Infrared cameras on satellites and night vision goggles could soon use lasers to cool their components. According to the study published in Nature, researchers in Singapore were able to cool the semiconductor cadmium sulfide from 62 degrees fahrenheit to -9 degrees by focusing a green laser on it and making it fluoresce and lose energy as light. Since they require neither gas nor moving parts, they can be more compact, free from vibration and not prone to mechanical failure."

132 comments

  1. I may finally install lights in my PC by jackb_guppy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I seen some cool case mods with glowing lights, now they could actually serve a propose! Neat.

    1. Re:I may finally install lights in my PC by arc86 · · Score: 2

      If you want to turn 40 watts of heat into blue light, I'm figuring that's something like 5000 lumens you're creating according to the luminosity function. That's a conference room projector worth of light. Then you have to figure the laser power required to get that much heat out, which according to the article's 2 percent efficiency estimate would be...a lot. I don't know how "cooling efficiency" is defined. Ideally you'd move the emission to infrared, but that would be disastrous for your night vision goggles.

    2. Re:I may finally install lights in my PC by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Rapid pulsing lasers (femtolasers) can drastically increase the wattage without actually increasing the number of joules drawn. Without having read the article (this is /. after all), it seems to me that using a pulsed laser would actually be better for this kind of application, because the medium being cooled needs time to actually let off the photons being generated.

      That being said, yes, I imagine that active cooling methods are probably significantly more energy efficient, at least for the moment. A peltier chip coupled with a big radiator and a large fan to circulate air is probably the best bang for the buck at the moment.

      Also, it's not the first time lasers have been used to cool objects down... I seem to recall that the first time BEC was produced in a lab, they used lasers to compress the matter, providing the cooling needed.

    3. Re:I may finally install lights in my PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Short pulsed lasers also increase the amount of damage to most surfaces compared to similar average power from slower or CW lasers. Sometimes working out the damage threshold is difficult short of just trying it. I've seen enough high powered laser optics in catalogs, that next to their power rating is an asterisk, with a warning "No damage threshold spec given for short time scale pulse lasers."

  2. Yeap, a bright idea by c0lo · · Score: 2

    So, shining a green laser into some goggles: what can go wrong?

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    1. Re:Yeap, a bright idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ze goggles, zey do NUTHINK!

    2. Re:Yeap, a bright idea by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ze goggles, zey do NUTHINK!

      I see nothing wrong with the goggles... I see NOTHING! AAAAAHHHHHH

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Yeap, a bright idea by rally2xs · · Score: 2

      Are they heavy? Yes? Well then they're expensive. Put 'em back.

    4. Re:Yeap, a bright idea by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      Do not look directly into the laser with remaining good eye.

  3. Pff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Been saying lasers are cool for ages, but do they listen to me? Nooo...

    1. Re:Pff by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Been saying lasers are cool for ages, but do they listen to me? Nooo...

      So I'm out with the astronomy club with all our cool glass and tubes and stuff and have people looking at Jupiter, Saturn, Mars, M-13, fun stuff like that there. Someone asks, "Which star is Sirius?" I pull out my laser pointer and show them. Little kid says, "Whoa! That's COOL! Mom! Buy me one!"

      I tell the mother, "No, do not buy him one. Laser is not toy. Can blind himself or a friend with it. Under no circumstances should you buy him a laser. Buy him a UV flashlight to look at centipedes or something."

      Lasers are cool, but only for grown up kids.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Pff by GumphMaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      These pointer lasers are controlled items in many places because, aside from the obvious general hazard, morons deliberately point them at aircraft cockpits. Only occasionally do the fools get identified but it warms the cockles of my heart when they do: I am an amateur astronomer and have also been involved in the airborne end of this stupidity.

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    3. Re:Pff by deimtee · · Score: 2

      A moron indeed. You need to be a malicious arsehole to point one at a plane, but how dumb do you have to be to point it at a Police helicopter!

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    4. Re:Pff by Genda · · Score: 1

      It happens, and the answer is flat line on he EEG brain dead.

    5. Re:Pff by mat8913 · · Score: 2

      I liked lasers before they were cool.

    6. Re:Pff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      grown ups kill and hurt way more people than kids.

  4. Efficiency by kevink707 · · Score: 2

    How efficient is this process? Would it be useful as a general replacement for current refrigeration technology?

    1. Re:Efficiency by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      I think it only cools things which fluoresce.

    2. Re:Efficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How efficient is this process? Would it be useful as a general replacement for current refrigeration technology?

      Depends on the temperature you start cooling at but between 1.2 and 2% so dont expect to see it in a fridge any time soon.

    3. Re:Efficiency by phozz+bare · · Score: 1

      That shouldn't be an obstacle, as current refrigeration technology doesn't directly cool the air in your fridge/home/office either. It would be possible to cool some object using the laser then use the low temperature of the now cold object to cool the surrounding air. However as long as the efficiency is indeed 1.2-2% as mentioned in an adjacent comment this is no replacement for current A/C tech.

    4. Re:Efficiency by dywolf · · Score: 2

      Possibly not too efficient. But, this process has a huge advantage over current methods that is completely ignored by the article and many slashdotters so far: it would work in a vacuum. And when you're the only viable method in town for a certain niche, efficiency doesnt matter so much.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    5. Re:Efficiency by skids · · Score: 1

      However as long as the efficiency is indeed 1.2-2% as mentioned in an adjacent comment this is no replacement for current A/C tech.

      I guess that depends on how efficiently the fluoresced light (and refracted laser light) can be converted back into electricity.

    6. Re:Efficiency by DrStoooopid · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but when you close the door, the light will go on!

      --
      There are 2 groups of people you can make fun of on the Internet without fear of attack. The illiterate, and the Amish.
  5. That wont work.. by Brad1138 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It would freeze the water around the shark.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  6. Rubidium by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 3, Informative

    This has been used to cool rubidium to near 0K in labs for a while. Takes some work (the laser needs to be *perfect*), but I've seen the setup myself at a previous employ at a local University.

    1. Re:Rubidium by Noughmad · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, this is different. What you describe is called Doppler cooling and is basically "slowing down" the atoms/ions.

      TFA, on the other hand, talks about using a laser to cause fluorescence in the material. It's a completely different principle.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    2. Re:Rubidium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is different. What you describe is called Doppler cooling and is basically "slowing down" the atoms/ions.

      TFA, on the other hand, talks about using a laser to cause fluorescence in the material. It's a completely different principle.

      Doppler cooling of atoms involves -- as explained by the page you linked to -- (a) the selective absorption of photons opposing the atoms, slowing the atoms down and (b) the essentially indiscriminate scattering of the absorbed photons in random directions, producing zero net (i.e. averaged over events) force, which is also known as fluorescence. The principles involved in the work of TFA and the laser cooling of atoms and ions are in fact very similar.

    3. Re:Rubidium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The cool in Doppler cooling comes from absorbing the photon which changes the kinetic energy of the atom, then fluorescence that does not contribute back to the heating. Here, it is dependent on the semiconductor band structure, and involves absorbing the photon, then a release of another photon and a phonon to cancel out lattice vibrations.

    4. Re:Rubidium by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Yes, your description is just how it was explained to me. I wasn't sure if the one in the article used a similar process. I do remember the rubidium "glowing" so I thought it might be the same.

  7. Defeats the purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The primary purpose of Night Vision goggles is to see clearly in the dark in those times where you can't/won't use a torch. So, in times where you may not want to be seen yourself.
    How is it helpful to have the goggles shine with green laser light to cool them off in this situation?

    1. Re:Defeats the purpose by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      The laser shines inside onto the back of the sensor.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    2. Re:Defeats the purpose by aXis100 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's only the sensor that needs to be cooled below ambient, other parts can use traditional methods. So, you make the back side of the sensor flouresce, capture that light in a chamber where it is converted back to heat, then dissipate that heat through regular air cooled heatsinks.

      In the end it's just shifting the heat whilst working against a thermal gradient - same as a refridgerative system, but without moving parts.

    3. Re:Defeats the purpose by pushing-robot · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, Hollywood prop designers finally feel vindicated.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    4. Re:Defeats the purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At last, an explanation for Sam Fisher's "stealth suit".

  8. Defeats the purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you want your night vision goggles to suddenly start lighting up with green laser light as they are being used? Most situations where you use NV goggles you don't want to be seen yourself (otherwise, why not a flashlight?) so it seems to be counter-productive.

  9. NOT NEWS by CurunirAran · · Score: 1

    How is this news? Scientists have been doing this to make BECs FOR AGES.

    1. Re:NOT NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew I smelled something delicious coming from the lab this morning!

    2. Re:NOT NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you actually read the paper (hah), you will see that the mechanism is pretty different (solid state vs gas).

    3. Re:NOT NEWS by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      BECs means Bike Engined Cars to me.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:NOT NEWS by cusco · · Score: 1

      Bose-Einstein Condensate seemed obvious to me, but what the frack is a 'Bike Engined Car'??? Pedal-powered? Or 'bike' as in 'motorbike'?

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    5. Re:NOT NEWS by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      A car with a motorbike engine.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  10. Use SI units for reporting science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The scientists used SI units all the way through in their paper (Kelvin for temperature), and they would have been laughed out of court and certainly not published in Nature if they'd done otherwise.

    Why does Slashdot even accept a submission in Fahrenheit when the subject is science? Most nerds understand SI units, and most of the planet is metric. How about trying to be a bit educational for the few that don't? Quote both if you're trying to be helpful, with the SI units as primary for science reporting and imperial equivalents only in brackets.

    1. Re:Use SI units for reporting science by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Why does Slashdot even accept a submission in Fahrenheit when the subject is science?

      Because you can't do car analogies in SI units. It just doesn't work.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Use SI units for reporting science by tsa · · Score: 0

      This. But the US probably thinks that together with Lyneria and Muanmar they are the only developed countries on the planet.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    3. Re:Use SI units for reporting science by tsa · · Score: 0

      Damn virtual keyboards. Lyberia and Myanmar!

      --

      -- Cheers!

    4. Re:Use SI units for reporting science by tepples · · Score: 1

      Damn virtual keyboards. Lyberia and Myanmar!

      So would you agree that even a laser-projected keyboard isn't cool for typing?

    5. Re:Use SI units for reporting science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BECUZ not everyone is a noid.

    6. Re:Use SI units for reporting science by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      If it was in Celsius or Kelvin US readers wouldn't know whether to wear a coat or shorts when they went to visit the laser.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    7. Re:Use SI units for reporting science by gef7 · · Score: 1

      Information which passes via US news redistribution streams is obviously mangled... business as usual!

    8. Re:Use SI units for reporting science by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

      Reply to undo wrong mod.

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    9. Re:Use SI units for reporting science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and they would have been laughed out of court and certainly not published in Nature if they'd done otherwise.

      Unless they were doing a paper in plasma physics, particle physics or some electrical engineering topics and gave temperatures in eV (electron volts)...

    10. Re:Use SI units for reporting science by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Damn virtual keyboards. Lyberia and Myanmar!

      Let me type "Liberia" for you on my entirely non-virtual keyboard. :-)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    11. Re:Use SI units for reporting science by tsa · · Score: 1

      Damn me! :)

      --

      -- Cheers!

    12. Re:Use SI units for reporting science by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Why does Slashdot even accept a submission in Fahrenheit when the subject is science?

      Because you can't do car analogies in SI units. It just doesn't work.

      Yeah. It's like...talking about the miles per gallon of an electric car.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  11. Might work ? by perpenso · · Score: 1

    The primary purpose of Night Vision goggles is to see clearly in the dark in those times where you can't/won't use a torch. So, in times where you may not want to be seen yourself. How is it helpful to have the goggles shine with green laser light to cool them off in this situation?

    Presumably the system would be completely self contained. Neither the laser nor the fluorescing being visible. Maybe we can think of the fluorescing as a mechanism to conduct heat from the electronic components to the case of the NVG. Of course that would heat up the NVG case but perhaps it is not emitting in the iR anymore than the person's face underneath it. More info is needed.

    1. Re:Might work ? by unrtst · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Presumably the system would be completely self contained. Neither the laser nor the fluorescing being visible. Maybe we can think of the fluorescing as a mechanism to conduct heat from the electronic components to the case of the NVG. Of course that would heat up the NVG case but perhaps it is not emitting in the iR anymore than the person's face underneath it. More info is needed.

      I've seen multiple posts like this one, and they all seem to be missing a huge point (maybe I'm getting trolled? ... or maybe I'm completely wrong).

      From the article (sorry, I read it):
      "...starting from 290 kelvin. We use a pump laser with a wavelength of 514 nanometres, and obtain an estimated cooling efficiency of about 1.3 per cent and an estimated cooling power of 180 microwatts."

      Where the hell is all the heat going if you stick this thing inside some goggles with the direct purpose of cooling something inside said goggles? That question has nothing to do with the above quote... it's there to drive it home - look at how inefficient this process is!?! I'm sure it's extremely useful and interesting for a great many cases, but I don't see (pun) how this is good for night vision goggles.

      I keep picturing a guy on a sailboat blowing really hard on his sail.

    2. Re:Might work ? by perpenso · · Score: 1

      ... How is it helpful to have the goggles shine with green laser light to cool them off in this situation?

      Presumably the system would be completely self contained. Neither the laser nor the fluorescing being visible. Maybe we can think of the fluorescing as a mechanism to conduct heat from the electronic components to the case of the NVG. Of course that would heat up the NVG case but perhaps it is not emitting in the iR anymore than the person's face underneath it. More info is needed.

      I've seen multiple posts like this one, and they all seem to be missing a huge point (maybe I'm getting trolled? ... look at how inefficient this process is!?! I'm sure it's extremely useful and interesting for a great many cases, but I don't see (pun) how this is good for night vision goggles.

      I'm not arguing that it would work or even be practical. There must be easier ways to conduct heat, methods that don't add to battery usage. I'm just pointing out that the laser and the fluorescence are internal to the unit, and that only key electronic components need to be cooled not the entire unit. :-)

    3. Re:Might work ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep picturing a guy on a sailboat blowing really hard on his sail.

      What the hell are you picturing that for?
      Picture the guy aiming a laser at the sail!

    4. Re:Might work ? by darkfeline · · Score: 1

      There's no law of preservation of heat, only preservation of energy. Presumably, part of the heat energy is transformed into light, and part of it is stored into the reactant products. Think of those portable heat packs. "If the pack itself is at room temperature, where does the heat come from?" Also, heat != temperature.

    5. Re:Might work ? by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      It is a "new" way to move heat. In night vision goggles, it could move heat from the sensor to the casing, as only the sensor (and perhaps the optics) must be cold. However, I would imagine a Peltier element being more efficient, and that this mostly makes sense where a) You have no heat sink (mostly in space, I guess) or b) The cooling devices is not in direct contact with what is being cooled (the technique is already used in this way to cool gasses for making Bose Einstein condensates, where the thing being cooled is so cold that having it contact the cooling device defeats the purpose).

    6. Re:Might work ? by Jeng · · Score: 1

      I was picturing the display of the goggles being the light output from the cooling, so the display would be endothermic instead of exothermic.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    7. Re:Might work ? by unrtst · · Score: 1

      Things in space and really cold stuff makes perfect sense. Both articles even point to that for the most part.
      The night vision thing is only mentioned in the dumbed down txchnologist piece, and only once, and via a small quote from someone that wasn't even involved in the project:

      “The big potential users of this cooling technology are night-vision goggles, and infrared cameras on satellites, where weight is very important and you would not want the motors and pumps and vibrations that come with regular coolers if you can,” says Richard Epstein, a University of New Mexico physicist and CEO at technology startup ThermoDynamic Films, who did not take part in this research.

      I'd love to know the rest of the context for that comment, because it seems absolutely crazy to me that night-vision goggles and infrared cameras on satellites are _THE_ big potential users of one given cooling technology... those are VERY different applications. There are optics involved in each of them, but otherwise they are very different beasts. It'd make a lot more sense if "goggles" were simply dropped from the sentence, and I wouldn't be surprised if that was some editor jacking in "goggles" after he read "night-vision", and messing up the quote.

      There are so many comments on this page about night vision goggles, and yet my hunch is that is the single most incorrect or out of place phrase on that article. This is a good progression of laser cooling, and could have useful applications, but night vision goggles? There's gotta be better and more exciting uses than that!? (if that would even be useful there in the least)

  12. Because retro is cool by davidwr · · Score: 1

    In tech circles, english units are the Steampunk of measurements.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  13. Cool! by tsa · · Score: 2

    But what cools the laser?

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Cool! by perpenso · · Score: 1

      But what cools the laser?

      The heat sink with external cooling fins (maybe a low RPM fan ?) that the NVG electronics used to be connect to. :-)

    2. Re:Cool! by gman003 · · Score: 2

      More lasers.

    3. Re:Cool! by Nationless · · Score: 5, Funny

      Another laser, duh.

    4. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's lasers all the way down.

    5. Re:Cool! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      But what cools the laser?

      The frickin' sharks attached to the lasers!

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find they are actually Ill tempered, mutated sea bass.

    7. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are Cool by themselves :)

  14. Re:Now we just need to send a rocket to the sun by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, laser puts in the cooler you!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  15. Awesome by sidevans · · Score: 1

    I've been looking for new ways to keep my flux capacitor cool.

    --
    I'm not signing anything
  16. Wow, Singapore !! by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    Singapore is a tiny island nation, with a tiny population of 4 million citizens (the actually number of people living on that island is 5+ millions, but with close to 2 millions being non-citizens).

    I guess congratulations are in order for that tiny nation for funding these type of advance research !

    Perhaps t'is another indication of the shift from the West to the East,

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Wow, Singapore !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, it's an indication that out of a population of 5m or so, that they were able to find the probably less than 0.000000002% of the population and funding to make this happen. A country that size is capable of producing advances, they just don't have the luxury of taking the kind of shotgun approach that nations the size of the US can take.

      Even in the US, a college might have 30k students and the research teams are still fairly small.

  17. Let me get this straight... by AJWM · · Score: 1

    ... you make the light sensor more efficient by making it fluoresce?

    Um, right. Good luck with that.

    --
    -- Alastair
    1. Re:Let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? It doesn't need to fluoresce on the same spectrum.

  18. Could this be used for PC cooling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  19. Re:Now we just need to send a rocket to the sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about friendly broccoli?

  20. Sundiver. by bejiitas_wrath · · Score: 1

    The novel Sundiver by David Brin did this; they used a powerful laser to suck heat out of the Sundiver craft within the atmosphere of the Sun.

    --
    liberare massarum ex ignorantia, clausa descendit molestie.
    1. Re:Sundiver. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my first thought too. Amazing that they're now making something similar In Real Life.

    2. Re:Sundiver. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah? and just who many watts would a green lazer have to put out to cool and protect anything entering the corona of a star? and if it did, what would it be measuring? surely not the temperature, pressure or density.

      buahahahahahaha!!!!!

  21. Peltier by gringer · · Score: 1

    How does this compare with peltier cooling? Is there some obvious reason (e.g. no airflow) why peltier won't work in space?

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
    1. Re:Peltier by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I think peltier would be inefficient in space...you need power to run it, and you could add heat exchangers to a passive cooling system instead of the solar panels needed to run the peltier cooler.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Peltier by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      Depends on the desired temperature, where you are in space, and where you have to move the heat from and to, and how much heat you have to move. Peltier coolers are indeed used in space, along with many other cooling technologies. All active coolers in space get tied to passive radiators to dump the waste heat.

  22. A perfect CPU fan replacement? by Twinbee · · Score: 2

    Would it be possible to cool CPU chip surfaces by coating them with this glowing material to achieve the same effect?

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    1. Re:A perfect CPU fan replacement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they could be.. I think many people are misunderstanding, portable devices currently use terribly energy inefficient methods like peltier cooling plates that are maybe 10% efficient but have no moving parts and are compact. A house air conditioner is noisy, large, breaksdown, etc but is maybe 40-50% efficient. One can only assume then, this discovery is better than the 10% or has the potential to be... else it would be kind of pointless outside specialized applications.

    2. Re:A perfect CPU fan replacement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would it be possible to cool CPU chip surfaces by coating them with this glowing material to achieve the same effect?

      Sure, if you don't mind paying about $500,000 for a cooling system on a $500 computer... remember, you need the coating AND the laser, otherwise it's like buying all the body panels for a Ferrari, gluing them together without a frame, engine, etc. and calling the result "a Ferrari".

  23. Laser cooling is handy, but requires precision by drwho · · Score: 2

    Handy for things like uranium isotope separation, and also for creating things like Bosenovas. The problem is, that the process is very sensitive to the frequency of the laser. If these guys have found a way to reliably, inexpensively create the right frequency of light to cool anything...then that substance can act as a heat sink to cool other substance. This could open a whole exciting new era of science and technology. But I won't hold my breathe, the proof is in the pudding, etc.

    1. Re:Laser cooling is handy, but requires precision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > inexpensively create the right frequency of light to cool anything

      I didn't see anything that suggests they could cool anything, just a very few known number of materials with very unique structures that support the anti-stokes deal.

    2. Re:Laser cooling is handy, but requires precision by cusco · · Score: 1

      When I first read your post I was wondering how a laser could create Brazilian music (bossa nova), but I guess an exploding Bose-Einstein Condensate is worth checking out too.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  24. Sundive in 5...4...3...2...1 by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 2

    We have our refrigerator laser, now all we need is a stasis generator, to "control the flow of tune and space through the body of the Sunship, so that the violent tossing of the chromosphere would seem a gentle rocking to those inside." And I'm sure we'll have that any day now.

    Yup.

    Any.
    Day.
    Now.

  25. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... so in order to increase night vision, we have laser making night-googles loose temperature via fluorescence, which is light-emission...
    Wouldn't it be quicker to just light up the scene instead?

  26. Sharks don't cook their meat by locopuyo · · Score: 1

    Finally they can keep their kills from rotting so they can eat them later.

  27. Metric is fine for car analogies ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Why does Slashdot even accept a submission in Fahrenheit when the subject is science?

    Because you can't do car analogies in SI units. It just doesn't work.

    Metric is fine for car analogies. Contemporary cars need metric tools, even US domestics.

  28. Please do not use retarded units. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "from 62 degrees fahrenheit to -9 degrees"
    Please do not use retarded units. Learn to SI. It's science after all.

    1. Re:Please do not use retarded units. by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I understand, what is retarded about the units? Has their velocity been reduced?

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  29. The article (sensibly) used Kelvin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did you fell that you have to dumb it down? This is not a yellow press trash site. Ok, ok, not supposed to be a yellow press trash site. So let's at least pretend, shall we?

  30. instead he's being educational for more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's being educational for those that use Celsius and Kelvin. Did you think of that?

    I don't think any scientific journal is going to laugh at anyone for using any particular unit. Scientists don't work that way. Science is not less noteworthy or scientific simple because it is in other units. They surely would have converted the figures to Celsius or Kelvin for publishing though.

    1. Re:instead he's being educational for more by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      Thanks, but we're here for a science lesson, not a history one.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  31. Now we can have a really cool shark with a laser by q.kontinuum · · Score: 1

    No further text

    --
    Trolling is a art!
  32. temperature in celsius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry about hijacking this thread, but nobody seems to have posted the temperatures in a proper scale yet, so here we go:

    Researchers in Singapore were able to cool the semiconductor cadmium sulfide from 17 degrees Celsius to -23 degrees

    1. Re:temperature in celsius by Cmdrm · · Score: 1
      A proper scale? Shouldn't it be in Kalvin then?

      Researchers in Singapore were able to cool the semiconductor cadmium sulfide from 290 degrees Kalvin to 250 degrees Kalvin

    2. Re:temperature in celsius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      A proper scale? Shouldn't it be in Kalvin then?

      Researchers in Singapore were able to cool the semiconductor cadmium sulfide from 290 Kelvin to 250 Kelvin

      Fixed your fix.

    3. Re:temperature in celsius by Cmdrm · · Score: 1

      A proper scale? Shouldn't it be in Kelvin then?

      Researchers in Singapore were able to cool the semiconductor cadmium sulfide from 290 degrees Kelvin to 250 degrees Kelvin

      Fixed it for myself

    4. Re:temperature in celsius by Cmdrm · · Score: 2

      A proper scale? Shouldn't it be in Kelvin then?

      Researchers in Singapore were able to cool the semiconductor cadmium sulfide from 290 Kelvin to 250 Kelvin

      Fixed it for myself

      Fcuk, I shouldn't comment after flying (Kelvin are absolute units)

    5. Re:temperature in celsius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A proper scale? Shouldn't it be in Kalvin then?

      Researchers in Singapore were able to cool the semiconductor cadmium sulfide from 290 kelvins to 250 kelvins

      Fixed your fix.

      Pedants, ho!

    6. Re:temperature in celsius by ChrisMaple · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, it should be in Hobbes.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    7. Re:temperature in celsius by CubicZirconia · · Score: 1

      A proper scale? Shouldn't it be in Kalvin then?

      Shouldn't it be in Kleins?

  33. Trolling away! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if only they could of made it from 62 degree fahrenheit to a more scientific unit!

  34. Misread the subject line.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thought it read COOKING. Now that would be cool!!!

    And before we get to "what could possibly go wrong", we've been using the domestic application of RADAR in our kitchens for decades. Apart from the usual faux pas - pets, sneakers, eggs - there's not been too many problems with that technology...

    1. Re:Misread the subject line.... by ledow · · Score: 1

      Well, put some of that semiconductor underneath the base plate, aim a 800W laser at it contained inside the device - depending on the speed the material loses heat at, it might be possible to make a "microwave freezer" that freezes (or at least cools) things in seconds.

      Probably pie-in-the-sky because of some physical limit (i.e. it might take hours to cool no matter how much power you aim at it), but the "microwave freezer" has been an April Fool "hoax" on at least one BBC science programme (Tomorrow's World) that I fell for when I was younger and would have LOVED to have a device that did that.

      If I can heat a meal to burning temperature in minutes, why can't I do the opposite too - reliably, cleanly, reproducibly, without consuming some resource that I would have to keep buying (except electricity, of course).

      The applications of a clean "quick-freeze" device run from not just your freezer and fridge, but down to drinks makers, coolboxes, industrial cooling systems, even processor coolers and air-conditioning. I'm actually quite amazed that in this day and age our most common way of cooling things is still the evaporation/condensation cycle of some gas, or blowing air around it. It just seems too primitive in a "quantum" world.

    2. Re:Misread the subject line.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe they explained it was 1.2% efficient, so an 800W laser would have the cooling power of POSSIBLY 1W. Most microwaves heat with 1000W+ worth of juice, so it might be slightly more effective with an 800,000W laser, like the ones used on military planes to vaporize jeeps.

    3. Re:Misread the subject line.... by ledow · · Score: 1

      1.2% efficient isn't bad for the first go at getting this effect with semiconductors though.

      Hell, I bet early solar panels weren't even that efficient, and they are all over the world now.

      You would need to get to about 50% efficiency to make them useful, though, but with no-moving parts and all the other advantages, probably even less than that would make them have practical application.

  35. A fix for global warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's no moon its a.... Cooler

  36. Re:Wow, Singapore !!l by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government has been throwing money at foreign imported talent to do r+d here in Singapore, Mostly they're 2nd rate talent who can't make it to the U.S.

    If you burn billions of dollars in a giant inferno, you're bound to find a diamond in the ashes...

  37. Saucer Lights explained by ayahner · · Score: 1

    That must be why the mother ship has all those lights. Cooling lasers. The overlords see in the heat spectrum (or not at all) and so never expected us to detect them. Blaart: It's like the huuuman is looking right at ussss. Pleaotard: Not possible, Overlord Blaartumus. We have the cooling lasers working overtime.

    1. Re:Saucer Lights explained by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I lol'd XD

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  38. Re:Wow, Singapore !!l by justthinkit · · Score: 1
    --
    I come here for the love
  39. International system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please! Please! Use the metric system. Only a minority of slashdot readers can understand those barbaric imperial units.
      "Laser cooling of a semiconductor by 40 kelvin."

  40. Re:Pfft by coldproduct · · Score: 2

    Agreed, having worked with a lab that certifies products sold in the US (21 cfr) and internationally (60825-1 and -2), lasers have gotten more powerful and compact than most folks realize. Class 4 lasers are easily integrated into the handheld green pointers that most of us have seen. What isnt realized is that the 150mw pointers that will blind you like a thief in the night. I have posted blue 445nm and green 532nm lasers to youtube that I have made burning through objects in close proximity, remember these are handheld pointers. Its all about your collimation, and focus on the desired target. These things are dangerous, and used by kids in third world countries for fun. Oh, btw green lasers emit 3 distinct wavelengths, 808 (almost invisible, therby bypassing your blink aversion), 1064nm (same deal), and 532nm which happens to be the peak wavelength for the cones in your eyeball which appears very intense.

  41. Re:Wow, Singapore !!l by bitingduck · · Score: 2

    I've known more than a few USians who left and went to Singapore because the funding situation is a lot less hassle-- no more proposals to underfunded agencies with low hit rates for small pots of money. Singapore sets them up with a nice lab and stable funding so they can do the things they went into science for in the first place. It doesn't sound bad, but I wouldn't really want to live in Singapore.

  42. COOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know it:
    They can cool something because:
    Lasers are COOL!

  43. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Define 3rd world, imho the US is a third world country. Look at where all the real tech is being innovated instead of litigated. It ain't here.

  44. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, btw green lasers emit 3 distinct wavelengths, 808 (almost invisible, therby bypassing your blink aversion), 1064nm (same deal), and 532nm which happens to be the peak wavelength for the cones in your eyeball which appears

    This depends on the quality of your pointer. There should be an IR filter in there to remove the other frequencies, but it's best to assume there isn't, just like it's best to assume a gun is loaded.

  45. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even ones with filters can have really crappy ones, which along with a crappy frequency doubler, can mean you still end up with more IR than green light. A coworker was once sorting through a cabinet of old laser power meters to see if they still worked an were accurate. The first said 5 mW for a laser pointer he had, and then he thought the next one was broken when it said 15-20 mW... then so did the third, and forth one. Turned out the first one wasn't sensitive to IR, while the rest were, more than tripling the power measured coming out of the laser pointer.

  46. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worse, most of the cheap ones emit significantly more energy in the two IR wavelengths than the visible one. Makes em burn things better, especially your eyes.

  47. Re:Now we just need to send a rocket to the sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, in Soviet Russia, they put you in the cooler for even knowing what a laser is. The way they see it, if you know it exists, you might decide you want one, and that's contrary to the collective good, tovarich. Back to your beet field!

  48. On the bright side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (U see what I did there? Commence rofling... okay, stop now.)

    This brings a new concept to manufacturing and technology; the concept of "waste light", or luminescence that has no practical purpose in the apparatus and actually impedes proper functionality.

    You know what that means, don't you?

    Don't you?

    It means we're going to have glowing gizmos, not because (like the status-quo) they were designed to emit light, but because the light is the by-product of its normal function.

    [*boom*]