Slashdot Mirror


Iran Says It Sent Monkey Into Space and Back

Iranian state TV is claiming that the country has successfully sent a monkey into space and back, bringing Iran one step closer to its goal of a manned space flight. According to the report, the rocket named Pishgam, or Pioneer in Farsi, reached a height of 120km. From the article: "Iran has long said it seeks to send an astronaut into space as part of its ambitious aerospace program, including plans for a new space center announced last year. In 2010, Iran said it launched an Explorer rocket into space carrying a mouse, a turtle and worms."

70 of 425 comments (clear)

  1. Was it President Ahmadinejad? by peter303 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sometimes his policy explanations are as believable as a monkey's.

    1. Re:Was it President Ahmadinejad? by Dave+Emami · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, Ahmadinejad usually is depicted as a monkey in the expatriate Iranian press, and (so I hear from relatives there) commonly referred to as such in Iran by a lot of folks. There was even an incident a few years ago where a girl on a kid's TV show innocently mentioned that her dad had nicknamed her toy monkey after the guy. Part of it is due to perceived physical resemblance, and part due to the belief that he doesn't actually wield independent power but is just Supreme Leader Khamenei's "trained pet."

      --

      "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
    2. Re:Was it President Ahmadinejad? by Dave+Emami · · Score: 2

      Mr Emami is an Iranian. Whom speake like that about president of his mother's country, is not a reach human. Who could beleive to this kind of humans.

      It's my dad's country, actually, though I did live there for a while -- specifically, I was there when Khomeini took over, so I got to see the before and after versions, and whatever the Shah's faults, what replaced him is much, much worse.

      As to humanity, ask Neda Agha-Soltan... oh, wait, you can't, she was shot by a basiji during the 2009 demonstrations. Perhaps you can ask Farrokhroo Parsa, then... no, she was executed by the mullahs for the crime of being appointed Minister of Education by the Shah. Not the head of SAVAK or the army or the police, not responsible for the death or injury of anyone, just the Minister of Education, the first woman cabinet minister ever in Iran. How about asking Mona Mahmudnizhad... oops, can't do that, she was executed along with nine other Iranian women by the mullahs in 1983 for the crime of being a Baha'i.

      And as for criticizing a country's president, well, that's an everyday occurence in a free country. No matter how much I supported or respected a US president, I would never call someone "not human" for criticizing him. Heck, back in High School, I had a teacher who mocked the president every chance he got, but all I did was laugh at him (outside of class, of course). And come to think of it, he never got arrested or fired. How very strange, huh?

      --

      "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
  2. and apparently... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ahmadinejad made it all the way back safely

    1. Re:and apparently... by slashmydots · · Score: 5, Funny

      That, sir, is offensive to monkeys.

    2. Re:and apparently... by mrops · · Score: 2, Informative

      Jokes and media brain washing apart. The guy lives so much more humbly that its hard to think if he is as crazy as western media shows him or is there more going on. The country is making progress in spite of all the sanctions. Not sure if its the Iranian media spin but the guy sits and eats simple foods on a mat on the floor, sleeps on the floor.

      I don't know which one is propaganda, this video or if the western media, or if there is a Jackal and Hyde going on here.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JyWul35JnjY

    3. Re:and apparently... by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      It the usual plan to demonise your enemy. Same happened to Fidel Castro; the same's happening now to Hugo Chavez.

    4. Re:and apparently... by dywolf · · Score: 2

      Cause they're totally innocent saints, right?

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    5. Re:and apparently... by Herr+Brush · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's not really the point. The point is that they are demonized beyond what the facts can support. Take a recent world leader for example. He kicked off two (arguably) illegal wars leading to the death of hundreds of thousands of civilians, took his country several steps back in terms of rights and freedoms and claimed his policy was guided by god. Surely this is a worse record than Ahmadinejad's but his reputation seems to have settled more on charismatic fool than evil psycho.

    6. Re:and apparently... by foniksonik · · Score: 2

      So how is Iraq these days, what with the lack of genocide, torture chambers and oppressed populace?

      https://www.google.com/m/search?q=iraq+news&hl=en&client=safari&tbo=u&source=univ&tbm=nws&sa=X&ei=wz4HUatiyOesAYy8gMAP&ved=0CEQQqAI

      Top headlines suggest political turmoil, economic progress, airways being opened to promote trade and cultural commentary.

      Looks pretty good.

      And you were saying?

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    7. Re:and apparently... by mrax · · Score: 2

      The guy lives so much more humbly that its hard to think if he is as crazy as western media shows him or is there more going on. The country is making progress in spite of all the sanctions. Not sure if its the Iranian media spin but the guy sits and eats simple foods on a mat on the floor, sleeps on the floor.

      I don't know which one is propaganda, this video or if the western media, or if there is a Jackal and Hyde going on here.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JyWul35JnjY

      Hitler was a vegetarian and didn't drink alcohol... His country prospered after his rise to power (until all out war broke out)... Didn't make him a particularly good guy, did it?

  3. From a US citizen by funky49 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Congrats Iran!

    --
    --- rapper/producer/bachelorette party stripper
    1. Re:From a US citizen by binarylarry · · Score: 3, Funny

      As an American, let me be the first to welcome Iran to 1948!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:From a US citizen by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Informative

      No thing is bad. Doesn't matter how ugly you think an item is, it is inanimate. Inanimate objects are neither good, nor bad. Without motivation and free will, there is no good, no bad. People are bad, and people are good.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    3. Re:From a US citizen by jbeaupre · · Score: 3, Funny

      I guess you never saw Time Bandits.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    4. Re:From a US citizen by funky49 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thank you AC for pointing out the obvious. Since Iran and North Korea share missile technology, you can assume what one can do, the other can do. This Slashdot story was different. There was a directive to keep an animal alive. This knowledge and ability to keep that monkey safe for the trip gives me hope. I'm not going to apologize for focusing on the positives. Eat shit, coward.

      --
      --- rapper/producer/bachelorette party stripper
    5. Re:From a US citizen by wmac1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Only 6 countries have that capability. No matter how much you troll.

  4. What ? What ? What ? by TractorBarry · · Score: 3, Funny

    Firing defenceless animals off into space for their twisted pleasure ?

    BOMB THE BASTARDS.

    --
    Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
  5. Stone age society develops space age technology by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like some sort of Flintstones / Jetsons crossover.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Stone age society develops space age technology by agoliveira · · Score: 3, Informative

      Depends on what you call "stone age society". They indeed have a lot to grow regarding individual freedom and rights (but, hey, so does USA currently) but they have lots of money, a great schools and universities, weath is well distributed and very low crime rate.

      --
      Scientia est Potentia
    2. Re:Stone age society develops space age technology by ag0ny · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As for great schools, perhaps they are, as long as you exclude science, philosophy, art, history, perhaps geography. Since they're state run (and the state bends the curriculum as they see fit), they are chock full of religion (which takes over the science, philosophy, and art departments) and since their government expresses blind hatred against other countries, I can only assume history and geography classes are equally skewed.

      And that's different from the U.S. how?

    3. Re:Stone age society develops space age technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Have you been in Iran before? go there and come back and then we can discuss your arguments, if your arguments are based on few videos you could be pretty wrong, however I accept any country/society has his own issues , in case that you fear to go there, I was there a month ago and met an blogger from new york http://www.humansofnewyork.com/tagged/iran

      to give you a clue about the quality of universities in iran, most of them are free,many like babak parviz studied and graduated from there, in case that you don't know him visit http://www.wearable-technologies.com/262 http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/texttrans/2009/01/20090115111056xjsnommis0.6168634.html#axzz2JHsyl8PX

      or just walk in to any american university and ask how many of their Master and PhD students are iranian ;)

    4. Re:Stone age society develops space age technology by hamvil · · Score: 2

      I see a pattern instead. Both US and Russian governments were pretty oppressive during their space race. US against the red menace and Russian against the evil of capitalism. Likewise, Iran is obsessed by the threats of a liberal society. It seems to me that hydrogen and paranoia are two mandatory ingredients for a space race.

    5. Re:Stone age society develops space age technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unlike Iran, the USA could have rewritten some history books for the entire world, but all the information is freely available to anyone, regardless of gender or religion.

      Also, in the USA, if you don't like the curriculum, you can homeschool your children, you can attend online course and there are literally thousands of colleges you can go to. No, let me go further than that, if you're from the USA, you have access to any and all democratic countries in the entire world.

      If you really can't see the difference, I propose this simple experiment. Choose a subject you want to learn about. Find the most comprehensive courses available, then start slashing out anything that might be considered harmful to Iran or it's religion. When that's done, then remove all bits that don't make any sense. Next and final step, create ties that replace the removed pieces, that are showing Iran and it's religion in a positive light, and possibly anybody else (especially the USA) in a bad one. Then, write it as a book, and publish it as fantasy fiction, because no sane person in a free world would believe it to be true.

      I'm not an American, I don't particularly care for them, but dismissing the entire nation and culture is wrong, narrowsighted, and possibly as dangerous as Iran and it's whole way of thinking.

    6. Re:Stone age society develops space age technology by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And that's different from the U.S. how?

      You mean other than the fact that you don't run the risk of having the religious police give you trouble over your beard length, that you don't get locked up in prison for being insufficiently Muslim? That you can still say the word "pizza," which has been banned in that country for being too western? That little details like being sent to prison or even killed for having been raped tend to stand out? Or charming features of Iran's foreign policy such as backing the annihilation of a specific country on religious grounds, or the steady support of some of the worst medieval-minded terrorist groups in the world because they are such?

      Never mind your completely spurious and disingenuous comparison of the school systems, or the fact that you just sitting here talking about it openly would - there - put in at risk of death in prison.

      Woops! Here I am feeding a troll. Never mind.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    7. Re:Stone age society develops space age technology by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Please, you're undermining years of propaganda there. Carefully crafted stereotypes, smashed to the ground! Please, don't destroy our egocentric arrogance like that! It is absolutely necessary that American believe that Iranians live in caves, eat raw meat (when meat is available), and that they have pedal cars on their cobblestone roads.

      Next, you'll actually expect us to believe that Iranians are LITERATE!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    8. Re:Stone age society develops space age technology by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      keep playing the false equivalency game

      but the only thing the silly game hurts is your own credibility

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    9. Re:Stone age society develops space age technology by ryzvonusef · · Score: 2

      And that's different from the U.S. how?

      You mean other than the fact that you don't run the risk of having the religious police give you trouble over your beard length, that you don't get locked up in prison for being insufficiently Muslim? That you can still say the word "pizza," which has been banned in that country for being too western? That little details like being sent to prison or even killed for having been raped tend to stand out? Or charming features of Iran's foreign policy such as backing the annihilation of a specific country on religious grounds, or the steady support of some of the worst medieval-minded terrorist groups in the world because they are such?

      Never mind your completely spurious and disingenuous comparison of the school systems, or the fact that you just sitting here talking about it openly would - there - put in at risk of death in prison.

      Woops! Here I am feeding a troll. Never mind.

      I am sorry, but WHAT THE FUCK?

      My dad was was posted in Tehran for two years, and and he regularly ate pizza like once a month. I would take you seriously if you weren't spouting such craziness. I mean, where did you *even* get this sort of silly ideas from?

      Also beard length and and the insufficiently muslim thing(what does it even mean, anyways?) is Taliban-run Afghanistan, My dad recalls that plenty of men were clean shaven in Tehran, and he had no trouble buying razors.

      Seriously people, Iran is not North Korea; heck not every third-world country is the same variety shitness, there is a gradient.

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
  6. Calling bullshit on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where did it land? Iran? No way. They would have to target the ocean and their navy is well monitored, blockaded and (honestly) fairly weak.

  7. They risked a valuable Monkey? by Bocaj · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm surprised they didn't start with some something more disposable, like a woman. I'm sorry, but it just shocks me that a society can make this kind of technological achievement and still treat some humans as second class citizens.

    1. Re:They risked a valuable Monkey? by HungWeiLo · · Score: 2

      Despite all that's wrong with Iran, they have a very decent education system - that is even accessible for women, as I was told.

      When I was at the University of Washington, there were quite a number of good researchers, lecturers, and post-grads I encountered in engineering and chemistry (both male and female) were educated in Iran.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    2. Re:They risked a valuable Monkey? by pr0t0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You mean like when the United States sent Alan Shepard into space in 1961, but didn't pass the civil rights act until 1964? And it's not like the CRA ended racial discrimination.

      --
      I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
    3. Re:They risked a valuable Monkey? by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 2

      The Iranian government despises western civilization, the people not so much.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
    4. Re:They risked a valuable Monkey? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      Because Iran is a Muslim country, and the fact is that most right-wing Americans are brought up to believe that Islam is a monolithic entity practiced exactly the same way across the entire world, and that if you find a Muslim doing something that's objectionable, it must follow that every Muslim in the entire world does the same damned thing.

      Also: Iran! Scary! They hate America therefore everything they do is bad!

      (By comparison, Christianity is _always_ the Church of England. Anything that's not happy clappy and liberal is either NOT REAL CHRISTIANITY or it's RIGHT you liberal commie muslimlover.)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:They risked a valuable Monkey? by cellocgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Despite all that's wrong with Iran, they have a very decent education system - that is even accessible for women, as I was told.

      I'm no expert on the current state of education in Iran, but I can tell you with certainty that one of our allies, rhymes with "howdy arabia," is far worse than Iran when it comes to religious freedom, women's rights, and government funding of Islamic terrorist groups. Never make the mistake of rating countries on the basis of the USA's "friend or foe" list.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    6. Re:They risked a valuable Monkey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Over 50% of higher education students in Iran are women. This is a known fact even in the western media.

    7. Re:They risked a valuable Monkey? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Let's see... the first unmanned suborbital space flight was a V2 launched by Germany in 1944. Germany at that time is sort of famous for having different classes of people, the treatment of some making Americans' worst imaginings about Iran look like playland.

      The US first launched something into space in 1949. That's twenty years before Mad Men is set, six years before Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on the bus, and 54 years before Lawrence v. Texas made the remaining anti-sodomy laws in the US unconstitutional.

      It seems a country's position on equality of its citizens has very little to do with its success in space flight.

    8. Re:They risked a valuable Monkey? by wmac1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You don't know what you are speaking about. Iranian women have a 60% share of universities (i.e. 2.5 million seats) and they are possibly more educated than (percentage wise) most other countries.

      At least 50% of almost 10 million university graduates are women.

    9. Re:They risked a valuable Monkey? by stymy · · Score: 2

      I realize that is a joke, but it seems that a lot of people here need to read this:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_Iran#Politics. Currently, Iran has 9 women in parliament. Ahmadinejad also appointed a female minister in 2009. The women's participation rate in the economy was 31.9% in 2009. That's still shy of the US's ~60%, but far better of Saudi Arabia's women's participation rate of between 5 and 15%. It seems to me that the only real laws limiting women in Iran, apart from abortion, is that they are required to wear head scarves. Compare that to Saudi Arabia, where they are not allowed to drive alone, need male witnesses to sign documents, and can't vote. It seems to me that the US is allied with the wrong Middle Eastern country, by equality and rights.

  8. Its probably not true by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its probably just to cover the news that their nuclear weapon research bunker was blown up.Don't look here, watch the monkey!

    1. Re:Its probably not true by Jeng · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oddly enough the story you are linking to says that that story may also be a fake.

      Perhaps the Iranians just feel really insecure and want to make people believe they are more of a threat than they are?

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  9. [citation needed] by Henriok · · Score: 2

    Isn't this something that would be easily confirmed by the nations watching Iran's rising power? Or is it confirmed already? Iran is famous for its photoshopping skills and their knack for skewing propaganda in their favor. On the other hand, they do have the technology to do this. At least in theory.

    --

    - Henrik

    - when the Shadows descend -
  10. Re:Pigs in space! by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

    To be experts, you have to be convincing.

    Iran usually isn't.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  11. Re:'Into space' by kj_in_ottawa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Correct, an orbit is a lot harder than just achieving an altitude.

    I do however, disagree with you about the conclusion you are trying to prove with your analogy.

    If you have never built any sort of a vehicle before, evolving from the toy stage through many many many steps to a formula 1 car may actually be a logical process, and therefore is relevant.

    Likewise, a progression from earthbound to an orbiting space station and beyond, may include a developmental step of placing a monkey in a missile.

    Cheers
    Kenny

  12. Women's rights by schneidafunk · · Score: 2

    Are you sure they aren't treated badly?

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
  13. Re:'Into space' by Blaskowicz · · Score: 2

    Yes, the difference in energy required to reach orbit is enormous.. Though I don't think you can quite orbit at 120km, there must be terrible atmospheric drag there.

    What's notable is that all the talks about space tourism in the US : they're mostly about achieving that same kind of suborbital roller-coaster that breaks an arbitrary 100km threshold. Making it cheap is probably the interesting part, I wonder if the Iranian version of this was cheap (taking your time to build a boring old rocket domestically), or expensive (throw money at the problem to build that boring old rocket instead of trying e.g. a cheap space plane thing).

    What I happen to think sadly is such rollercoaster trips for millionnaires are pointless and a waste of resources! Color me uninterested. Unless you do useful things (probing the high atmosphere, have a quick look at cosmic rays related stuff etc.)

  14. Re:Funny by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2

    A space program on the international stage isn't about getting people to like you. It's about getting people to fear you. You're basically showing the world that you have the infrastructure, cohesion, and technology to pull of a milestone feat for a nation. And it also implies that you can drop a nuke on any point on the globe.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  15. Re:What ? What ? What ? by penix1 · · Score: 2

    Nowhere in TFA does it say the monkey survived. For all we know it came back as chunky salsa...

    --
    This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
  16. Re:Funny by benjfowler · · Score: 2

    That stops working the millisecond a mushroom cloud appears over Iran.

    North Korea has a powerful friend (China). Iran burnt all their bridges, and thus has very few friends at all.

    Having powerful backers is more important than possessing a weapon too powerful to use.

  17. Re:Pigs in space! by filthpickle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While I am sure the parent was kidding...I have a friend who is only moderately stupid that firmly believes that the moon landings were faked. I found this a couple weeks ago, an interesting point of view.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGXTF6bs1IU

    We would have faked it...but actually doing it was easier at the time.

  18. WHAT do THEY WANT?!! by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Super-intelligent monkey manipulates another nation-state into providing it with a free joyride into space.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  19. I guess the propaganda is working. by trout007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From all of these anti-Iranian comments I guess the US propaganda is working well. Pretty soon you all we clamor for war and sign up to fight. It's amazing how people can hate those they never met.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    1. Re:I guess the propaganda is working. by medcalf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You might be misunderstanding. Persians and Americans are actually natural allies: we both want a stable Persian Gulf region, and together could provide it, as we did prior to 1979. But the Ayatollahs running Iran at the moment, since 1979, want an unstable Persian Gulf region, because that gives them openings to advance their religious interests. So even though there is a natural underlying affinity on a national level, on a political level there can be only conflict. The hostage crisis, where Iranian thugs took captive American embassy staff for well over a year, has not been forgotten in the US, and it colors our perceptions of Iran, and specifically of their leadership, to this day. On top of that, you have the Iranians committing acts of war against the US in Iraq (not only supplying and training our enemies, but planning and sometimes participating directly in attacks) and in Saudi Arabia (Khobar Towers), as well as apparently developing a nuclear weapons program aimed directly at destroying a key US ally, Israel, and really, after all of that, does there need to be "propaganda" to explain why American attitudes towards the Iranian government are what they are?

      All that said, yes, I generally despise theocrats I've never met, autocrats I've never met, dictators I've never met, and monarchs (other than titular only) that I've never met. I despise the enemies of human liberty generally. Is that really very amazing? And do you not also despise the enemies of liberty? Yet, why does that mean that I, or anyone else, is clamoring for war? It is possible to despise an ideology, and to attempt strenuously to oppose and in all ways limit that ideology, without clamoring for war. War is only necessary when irreconcilable differences over non-trivial differences exist. But just because we might not want war, does not mean we must start accepting those who would kill us if only they could.

      --
      -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    2. Re:I guess the propaganda is working. by klapaucjusz · · Score: 5, Informative

      You might be misunderstanding. Persians and Americans are actually natural allies: we both want a stable Persian Gulf region, and together could provide it, as we did prior to 1979.

      You are aware that the CIA put the Iranian dictator into power in 1953, toppling Iran's democratically-elected government in the process? The 1979 "Islamic Revolution" merely replaced a dictatorship controlled by the USA with one that wasn't.

    3. Re:I guess the propaganda is working. by steelfood · · Score: 2

      Propoganda always works against an intellectually lazy, shallow, disinterested, and ignorant population. Why do you think there's been such a concerted attack from the government on our primary education system over the past 10-15 years?

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    4. Re:I guess the propaganda is working. by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 4, Informative

      On top of that, you have the Iranians committing acts of war against the US in Iraq (not only supplying and training our enemies, but planning and sometimes participating directly in attacks) and in Saudi Arabia (Khobar Towers), as well as apparently developing a nuclear weapons program aimed directly at destroying a key US ally, Israel, and really, after all of that, does there need to be "propaganda" to explain why American attitudes towards the Iranian government are what they are?

      Secretary of Defense William Perry (at the time), the FBI, and Saudi Minister of the Interior Prince Nayef disagree with you about Khobar. The indictment in the US district court looks like a long list of Saudi citizens, and but a few others.

      As for "acts of war" in Iraq, the US plays the same game all the time, including the selling weapons to Iranian enemies, e.g. Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq War. This kind of turnaround is only fair play.

      You are clearly demonstrating the power American propaganda has over minds who should know better. It is very "interesting" how selective your memory happens to be.

    5. Re:I guess the propaganda is working. by metlin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's far from the complete truth. The unsaid fact is that Mosaddegh was trying to nationalize British and American owned oil operations, which was what prompted our actions.

      Ironically, Shah was a very modernizing influence in terms of rights for women and minorities. Yes, the man was batshit crazy, but he was aimed to create a secular state. Unfortunately, when the people revolted against him, Khomenei and his Islamic fundamentalist ilk essentially stole the revolution from the left liberals and established a theocracy in its place.

      Much like what's happening in Egypt today, where the Islamists have taken over a revolution from the left liberals.

      So, blaming the US for part of it is fair, but this is a classic example of unintended consequences.

  20. Re:What ? What ? What ? by crazyjj · · Score: 2

    FTFA:

    said the monkey returned safely.

    I presume that means "alive," unless Iran has a very different take on the word "safely."

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
  21. Re:What ? What ? What ? by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, to be fair, this is Iran. I mean look at the typical Islamist regime and their claims of "The Religion of Peace" while chopping off hands.

    --
    I got here through a series of tubes
  22. Keeping Up With N. Korea by guttentag · · Score: 2

    North Korea announced that it had put a "satellite" into "orbit," accomplishing two goals: artificially inflating national pride and telling the world "we're actually just practicing building rockets that may one day deliver nuclear weapons to your cities." Iran plays the same games with its own people and the world, so it's logical that they had to craft a similar announcement, whether it's true or not. The day North Korea announced the "success" of its satellite, you can bet Ahmadinejad called his advisors and said, "I need a space program milestone announcement ASAP!" Ahmadinejad doesn't want his people, or the world, to think he's not keeping up with poor Kim Jong-un.

    In both cases, you have countries that can barely afford to take care of their citizens, yet they are claiming to be building a full-fledged space program. Iran is a far more resource-wealthy country and its GDP is more than 10 times North Korea's, but its economy is suffering badly because of the international sanctions for its nuclear program, and the health of its people is suffering even worse. So the only reason they would make such an announcement would be to artificially inflate national pride and try to scare the rest of the world.

    Of course, Iran's people are not cut off from news from the outside world as effectively as North Korea's (despite police ripping satellite dishes off rooftops and a plan to unplug the country from the Internet), so this could backfire when the people protest about resources being spent on keeping monkeys breathing in space when there isn't enough air to breathe on the ground in Tehran.

  23. Misread by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    Iran said it launched an Explorer rocket into space carrying a moose

    A space møøse once bit my sister...

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  24. Re:Pigs in space! by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Moderately stupid. I need to remember that one, it could be precious one day. "You Sir, are only moderately stupid! Why can't you see reason?"

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  25. Re:Pigs in space! by bhartman34 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a friend who is only moderately stupid that firmly believes that the moon landings were faked.

    I would submit to you that if your friend firmly believes that the moon landings were faked, he's far more than moderately stupid. With all the evidence, believing the moon landing was faked is right up there with believing that the moon is made of gouda cheese. There's a reflector on the moon. If you know the coordinates, you can actually bounce a laser off of it back to Earth.

  26. Re:Funny by benjfowler · · Score: 2

    The US has many allies, including most of the West, Japan, and many other countries. Iran has (ummmm...) Venezuela (actually, Hugo Chavez and his friends), and North Korea. I think it would take a LOT to have the Muslim world fall in behind a handful of crazed Twelver shi'ites who hate their guts, against the mighty United States.

    I doubt anybody would be willing to militarily have a go at the US and Israel for glassing Iran. Israel flattened half the Middle East with one hand tied behind it's back several times since 1948. What makes people think that they can't do it again, especially when the United States comes to their aid, and ESPECIALLY when the gloves comes off. And then they do, the world will truly understanding the meaning of crushing military defeat.

    My money is on the States. Iran is its own worst enemy.

  27. Re:Pigs in space! by Antipater · · Score: 2

    A reflector on the moon isn't a sign that humans ever went there; an unmanned rover could have easily left it behind.

    Remember that when you're dealing with conspiracy theorists, evidence contrary to their belief will be dismissed out of hand. But that's fine - when they hold such a minority opinion, the burden of proof is on them, not you. The only way to have them see reason is to tirelessly rebut everything they come up with until, finally, they start to realize that the true explanation might be the one that doesn't nned to invoke mind control or aliens to fill in the gaps. In the specific case of the moon landings, it comes down to proving that the tech does work, that humans can survive in space, and that so many people could keep quiet for so long if there actually were a conspiracy. If there's no reason to believe we couldn't go to the moon, there's no reason to disbelieve the people who say we did.

    --
    Everything is better with chainsaws.
  28. Ahh yes, that's right by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If a western nation ever did anything bad, at any point in their history, that is remotely like something a non-western nation is doing today, well then the non-western nation gets a total pass. You can't criticize them because at one time something bad happened somewhere else!

    This false moral equivalency bullshit is just retarded. Every country has done bad shit in the past. Every country does bad shit now. That doesn't mean that we cannot, or should not, point out when it happens. This idea that every country that isn't the US, or at least every country that isn't western gets an automatic pass on everything they do because of bad shit that happen sin other places is beyond stupid and counter productive.

  29. Re:Pigs in space! by bhartman34 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I said "you", I should've said "astronomers". This is an experiment that has been done at many observatories, all over the world. It's easily falsifiable by any sufficiently sophisticated nation, and I can think of at least one that would've loved to have called "Bullshit!" on a moon landing, if it never happened.

  30. Re:Pigs in space! by wmac1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Iran has had 3 successful confirmed satellite launches. This one is a smaller rocket and it has failed once before. When the last launch failed Iranian head of IASA confirmed the failure.

  31. Re:'Into space' by wmac1 · · Score: 2

    The rocket used for this launch is one of the smaller rockets Iran uses for the purpose.

    Their main rocket carried a 50kg satellite to 500km in 2011 and their new rocket (i.e. Simorgh with 4 engines in first stage) is able to launch very much bigger loads.

  32. Re:Pigs in space! by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

    When I said "you", I should've said "astronomers".

    In other words, you haven't actually done it yourself, you just read about someone doing it.

    The point was, if you aren't going to believe that men have landed on the moon after someone else tells you it has happened, why would you believe that there is a reflector or three on the moon that those men you don't believe were there left behind just because someone else tells you they are there?

    The argument that someone is stupid for not believing we've been to the moon (and when I say "we", I should've said "astronauts") because someone else has said there are ways of proving it, is self-defeating.