Slashdot Mirror


Internet-Deprived Kids Turning To 'McLibraries'

theodp writes "After the school computer lab and public library close for the night in many communities, the local McDonald's is often the only place to turn for students without internet access at home. 'Cheap smartphones and tablets have put Web-ready technology into more hands than ever,' reports the WSJ's Anton Troianovski. 'But the price of Internet connectivity hasn't come down nearly as quickly. And in many rural areas, high-speed Internet through traditional phone lines simply isn't available at any price. The result is a divide between families that have broadband constantly available on their home computers and phones, and those that have to plan their days around visits to free sources of Internet access.' The FCC says it can make broadband available to all Americans by spending $45 billion over 10 years, but until then the U.S. will have to rely on Mickey D's, Starbucks, and others to help address its digital divide. Time to update that iconic McDonald's sign?"

331 comments

  1. Title translation by c0lo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Deprivation of Internet - a common cause of picking bad eating habits at low ages for Homo sapiens.

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    1. Re:Title translation by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      All the more reason to run an open hotspot with your router.

      Many newer routers allow a "guest" account that allows internet use without access to your LAN.

    2. Re:Title translation by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      I run an open hotspot. Unfortunately - it sees no use. I guess it has something to do with the fact that my house is located 1/4 mile from a barren stretch of highway that runs between two little forgotten nowhere towns.

      Oh well - you can't say I didn't TRY!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    3. Re:Title translation by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 2

      That makes me wonder, would you be upset if someone actually was sitting out in their car using it?

      Idk about you but I would be rather paranoid if someone was sitting in their car outside my house for a few hours at random hours of the night/day

      --
      -Noc
    4. Re:Title translation by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      Depends on time of day, and how long they were there. To be of any use, they would have to drive down our road, at least as far as the abandoned house my mother in law lived in. I check on anyone parked there, to see that they aren't vandalizing the place. If said occupant of car told me, "Hey, I found a free wifi, so I'm just checking my mail!" I'd say "Cool" and go about my business.

      On the other hand, seeing half a dozen cars parked there around the clock would probably motivate me to disable the WIFI.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    5. Re:Title translation by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3

      Also - it's only fair to point out, that my router goes THROUGH my Linux box before it goes to the modem. One of my net analyzers would quickly allow me to verify that the person(s) using my WIFI were doing legitimate things, like checking email, browsing legitimate sites, etc - or if they were using my connection to grab torrented movies, etc. I would quickly shut down a TOR tunnel, connections to porn sites, things like that.

      Someone who reads this will scream about CENSORSHIP! Whoop-ti-do - censorship. I'm offering a free connection for anyone who might find the damned thing out here in the middle of nowhere. The least they can do is to respect my need to avoid attention from RIAA and their ilk, or attention from the government for activity on child porn sites.

      Some schools of thought seem to make me "responsible" for anything going in or out of my internet connection.

      Not to mention, if they are torrenting, in might impact on my wife's ability to play Pogo games, then all hell would break loose!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    6. Re:Title translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that everybody knows to encrypt their wireless LANs, opening your own wireless LAN to strangers is going to attract the wrong kind of people. Most businesses don't want to have poor people hanging around their shops, and likewise many people wouldn't want "trailer trash" hanging around their homes for the free Wifi. It's the same reasoning why you don't feed pigeons.

    7. Re:Title translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Idk about you but I would be rather paranoid if someone was sitting in their car outside my house for a few hours at random hours of the night/day"

      That's me in the car. I don't do anything criminal on your WIFI I just report your comings and goings and those of your friends to the FBI, the ATF and the DEA.

    8. Re:Title translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Most businesses don't want to have poor people hanging around their shops, and likewise many people wouldn't want "trailer trash" hanging around their homes for the free Wifi. It's the same reasoning why you don't feed pigeons."

      But pigeons are delicious!

    9. Re:Title translation by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      That makes me wonder, would you be upset if someone actually was sitting out in their car using it?

      Nope just gives him someone to aim at.

    10. Re:Title translation by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between feeding pigeons and serving pigeon.

    11. Re:Title translation by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      If there were a half dozen cars around the clock, you could just put in a snack vending machine. Heck, you're not reselling your connection, you're just selling chips and pretzels!

    12. Re:Title translation by plopez · · Score: 2

      "abandoned house my mother in law lived in"
          Are you Norman's brother-in-law by any chance? Nice "wireless hotel". Drivers check in for the wifi, but they never check out...

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    13. Re:Title translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If said occupant of car told me, "Hey, I found a free wifi, so I'm just checking my mail!" I'd say "Cool" and go about my business.

      I'd go home and reboot the router at random intervals, because I'm a total git.

    14. Re:Title translation by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's all fun and games until someone gets stabbed in the shower.

    15. Re:Title translation by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you feed them before you serve them. Who wants scrawny pigeons?

    16. Re:Title translation by c0lo · · Score: 1

      All the more reason to run an open hotspot with your router.

      I'll do it when (or... is it if?) the "cyberwar", criminal copyright infringement and "think of the children" will cease to be words a politician would think get him advantages.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    17. Re:Title translation by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      40 quadrillion packets served!

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    18. Re:Title translation by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      WOAH- Business oportunity! Run a line out to that abandoned house, open up an Internet Cafe, and advertise to your neighbors!

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    19. Re:Title translation by Walter+Carver · · Score: 1

      Well it is cencorship, but it's your line and noone is forced to use it. You also have a legitimate reason, you want to avoid legal action and a whining wife.

      But what the fuck is wrong with a porn site?

  2. We should do it by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    If McDonald's can do it for free, then by all means, spend the 45 billion and teach them a lesson!

    1. Re:We should do it by 1u3hr · · Score: 2

      If McDonald's can do it for free, then by all means, spend the 45 billion and teach them a lesson!

      The $45 billion is to supply broadband to every home. McDonald's isn't doing that. No one is, which is the issue. Leave it to the profit motive and you'll only have affordable broadband in middle class urban areas.

    2. Re:We should do it by sqrt(2) · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They're not doing it for free, they operate a very profitable business selling food-like substances to people who are poor either in money or time. They've found that offering "free" wifi generates more additional revenue than the cost of operating the wifi--which they were probably doing anyway so that the store could have an internet connection.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    3. Re:We should do it by Baloo+Uriza · · Score: 2

      Which is why we shouldn't be championing lassez-faire capitalism as the end-all, be-all in American commerce.

      --
      Furries make the internet go.
    4. Re:We should do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the $45 billion is for the government - using taxpayer money - to extend the telephone and cable network to the taxpayers homes, which can then be given to the telecommunication companies who will sell access to said network back to the taxpayers.

      Politicians love the "if we spend $X we make the internet better!" because it sounds as if the end product will be free internet (well, not really free, but already paid for by our tax dollars). But what really is happening is a huge payoff to telecom, to improve their network at our expense so we can pay for it twice (or three times, since they already were given tax money to improve the network in the past).

      I'd rather that $45 billion go to providing free municipal wifi across the country but that's never going to happen because then how will the poor telecoms rake in billions? Won't somebody think of the telecoms?

    5. Re:We should do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I choose to live far from everything else, why should the rest of the country pay for my services?

    6. Re:We should do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then the poor that don't budget their money properly should stop wasting their money on cigs, booze, and recreational drugs. Then they would have money for internet access. I believe in helping those that need it but come on. What happened to personal responsibility when it comes to budgeting?

    7. Re:We should do it by plopez · · Score: 1

      If my job and family require me to live in remote areas; think farmers, ranchers, oil rig workers, and ancillary services; then why not? You can't have cheap milk or beef without cheap cows, grain, or fuel

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    8. Re:We should do it by plopez · · Score: 1

      The current system is so expensive and inefficient because it amounts to "feeding the chickens through the horse".

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    9. Re:We should do it by Baloo+Uriza · · Score: 1

      Same reason we already do so for rural roads. Commerce still depends on people like us. You like beef or driving a car? Thank rural Oklahoma.

      --
      Furries make the internet go.
    10. Re:We should do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And also why we shouldn't be giving money to the same companies that refuse to sell affordable broadband either.

  3. Wow by Jmc23 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I rtfa and am quite suprised by what passes for 'poor'. Seems more like people who don't know how to budget and set priorities. Judging by the amount of debt the US has, sounds like par for the course.

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    1. Re:Wow by Jmc23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, lot's of poor homeless people have no trouble collecting a dollar to buy a burger. This isn't the ritz you know.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    2. Re:Wow by Technician · · Score: 1

      Define poor.. I'm hardly poor, but my first oppertunity for Internet was on dial-up at $0.25/minute. I passed because the bang for the buck was terrible. In some rural areas like where my folks live, Broadband is a small fraction of 1Mbps supposidly due to the distance from the DSLAM, but at higher rates then my city DSL connection at 6 Meg. When the gap between dial-up and broadband is only ~3X faster and price is ~10X more, it makes sense to stay on dial-up for a while and just use email. YouTube is nothing but Buffering.... Buffering.... on either.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:Wow by Mitreya · · Score: 2

      I rtfa and am quite suprised by what passes for 'poor'. Seems more like people who don't know how to budget and set priorities.

      Believe me, you cannot solve a poverty-line salary by budgeting or "setting priorities". Most (granted, not all) of those people are poor because they do not make enough money. Inflation-adjusted wages have been stagnant for decades.

      Also, states are promoting state lottery that has about 50% effective payoff (vs casinos at 98% or so). That's gotta stop too - it is not helping.

    4. Re:Wow by oakgrove · · Score: 3, Funny

      states are promoting state lottery that has about 50% effective payoff

      Lottery
      Noun
      A game where a whole bunch of dumb people make one dumb person look really smart.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    5. Re:Wow by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Does this come up for discussion in small rural areas? I'm guessing small rural areas might not have lots of geeks but I'm sure at least one of them has to have considered setting up a mesh network. Or are the people not very friendly about sharing? I remember visiting Nicaragua and there being free and/or open wifis everywhere.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    6. Re:Wow by Osgeld · · Score: 1, Redundant

      homeless people are not blowing 100 bucks on a tablet or 200 bucks on a celphone they cant afford service to

      dumbshits do, they have the disconnected iphone and sit in public wifi zones to actually use them, they look good emailin while sitting next to the garbage can

    7. Re:Wow by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Sure, poor people with cars and laptops.

      I grew up poor. When I got my first part time minimum wage job (in Vancouver) I almost didn't know what to do with all the money. After all, it was more money than we had as a family of 5 growing up.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    8. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have seen a fair bit of homeless people that have a decent($500 or less) laptop. Could they afford the $800 a month for an apartment no. I don't think you understand how becoming poor works.

    9. Re:Wow by sqrt(2) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You might want to reassess your definition of poverty then. Cooking food yourself doesn't just involve purchasing ingredients. There is a substantial upfront cost of buying the equipment and infrastructure to turn ingredients into food. At the very least you'll need to heat water and have a surface that can be sterilized and used to cook on. You'll need utensils and pots/pans. The energy required will be either gas or electric which costs money. I suppose you could burn wood but that isn't free either and is illegal/impractical most places.

      So that $1 burger costs quite a bit more to cook yourself. If you have no equipment and no access to infrastructure then it's actually cheaper to buy fast food. The "total cost of ownership" of the food you make yourself is deceptive because much of the cost isn't directly related to the superficially cheaper ingredients.

      We haven't even touched on the subject of cheap food being almost universally less healthy--even if it provides enough caloric content. Then there are food deserts where healthy food isn't even an option.

      And for the "web enabled device" disqualifying you as poor remark; things really have changed that much. It happened so quickly that the older generation who can remember a time before the internet, or before computers, or before cell phones, thinks that owning or accessing those devices is a marker for the middle class and up. It's not anymore. Even the poorest citizens routinely use cellphones. Moreover, they NEED access to those devices/services just to be productive and make any money at all. Access to the internet or at least POTS is so vital that our government (rightly so) has partnered with industry players to make sure free cell phones are available to those who need them.

      If you don't have access to a phone, and now the internet, you are effectively barred from participating in the economy. We can't survive that. We can't function if those people are completely dependent on government services to survive. It actually works out better, is less costly, to give away cellphones and internet access so those people can provide for themselves at least more than they were before. The alternative to not providing those things is paying for someone's entire existence, or if you refuse that, paying to lock them up when they inevitably turn to crime just to remain alive.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    10. Re:Wow by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      Sure, poor people with cars and laptops. ... When I got my first part time minimum wage job (in Vancouver)

      In US, one usually has to have a car if they are to hold a job. Public transport is a joke in most locations. That may not be so in Vancouver - I don't know.

      The minimum wage in Vancouver is currently $10.25 ($10.28 US) and the federal minimal wage in United States is $7.25. I can't speak about your circumstances, but currently there is a 40%+ gap between those two.

      "A laptop" can cost any amount of money -- even brand new anywhere between $350 and $2000, so ownership of a laptop does not contradict being poor.

    11. Re:Wow by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      Being poor and making bad decisions usually go hand in hand.

    12. Re:Wow by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Also, once you buy a laptop, you get to keep it until it dies or is lost. Your job may well not last as long.

    13. Re:Wow by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      At the time US minimum was higher with exchange rate and I was only working 16-24/week.

      Priorities. Poor people are used to walking. Sometimes I would walk 14km just to go to the mall, sometimes 20-30km to get home from a party. A bike is infinitely more affordable and healthier than a car. As well, if you think having 350$ of disposable income is poor, well like I said, really suprised by what you guys consider 'poor'.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    14. Re:Wow by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Isn't the US supposed to be the 'richest' country in the world?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    15. Re:Wow by darkHanzz · · Score: 1

      There is a substantial upfront cost of buying the equipment and infrastructure to turn ingredients into food

      Ah, come on. Ah stove and some knives aren't that expensive and last for years. In the US it's the fruits and vegetables that are expensive.

    16. Re:Wow by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Wow, what a dickish comment. As if CHILDREN have any influence over the irresponsible spending practices of the US government. (Score: 5, Knee-jerk anti-American)

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    17. Re:Wow by Mitreya · · Score: 2

      Priorities. Poor people are used to walking. Sometimes I would walk 14km just to go to the mall, sometimes 20-30km to get home from a party.

      Some people have children to get back to. It is not just the matter of not willing to walk 10-20km, but the lack of spare time to do so. Same with owning a car -- needing to get back home and/or to the 2nd job quickly enough is a must for many people.

      Car ownership is not really a luxury. I am quite happy to get along without a car nowdays, but I live in a major US city with decent public transport.

    18. Re:Wow by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      A handful of insanely wealthy aristocrats does not raise the general income of the population. This is reflected in education and health as well.

    19. Re:Wow by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Wow, what poor reading comprehension.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    20. Re:Wow by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Your right, they are finding them when the drug abusers steal and stash them in order to sell or trade them for more drugs later.

      Actually, it is more likely they have an Obama phone (which was started long before Obama was president) and some second hand devices donated or given to them somehow.

      And if the homeless person begs properly, they can make a very good paycheck. There have been numerous reports on people pretending to be homeless and panhandling at the off ramp while making in excess of 60K a year doing so. I think there are even examples of this in California where people were driving foreign spots cars and got caught on film by a news station.

    21. Re:Wow by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Right, but aren't they the ones making the decisions?

      Dumb decisions aren't just for the poor.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    22. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you don't really need high speed internet either. Just 10 Mbps is usually more than enough. Most cheap devices can't handle much more than that anyways.

      Sure having the usual 100-400 Mbps is nice, but we did manage with 10 Mbps just 5 years ago, so why not today?

    23. Re:Wow by sqrt(2) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You also have to pay for a place to store those things (flat, house, or something), and pay to have energy delivered to that dwelling to run those appliances. You'll also need transportation to and from a grocery store which could be substantially farther away than McDonald's. You're in grinding poverty, remember, so no car. It'll also take you much longer to shop that way, even before you get to start making food. Upfront costs instantly make the "cheaper" solution a non-starter for many people trapped in poverty.

      I can leave you with the same idea expressed more colorfully by Terry Pratchett, from Men at Arms,

      The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money.

      Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles.

      But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.

      This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socio-economic unfairness.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    24. Re:Wow by Baloo+Uriza · · Score: 1

      Want to know how I know your idea of economics in the US is stuck in 1993?

      --
      Furries make the internet go.
    25. Re:Wow by Baloo+Uriza · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thank you for explaining why McDonald's is not only popular, but thriving, in the American midwest. I was surprised to discover that, unless you live in a big city like McAlester, Claremore or Lawton, indoor plumbing is still a "maybe." Want basic landline phone service? That's a very real maybe. Want electricity? That's almost definitely a solar panels on your roof thing. Want indoor plumbing? Then you're stuck on a water cistern or a well, both of which depend on electricity. Whether you go well or cistern largely depends on whether or not fracking has destroyed the water table yet. And if you're on a cistern in rural Oklahoma two years into a drought, well, a shower is a five gallon bucket of water heated with a bucket heater, once a week, and you're happy to have the luxury of water to spare for bathing at all. (No, your coworkers and clients don't complain, they're in the same boat).

      --
      Furries make the internet go.
    26. Re:Wow by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I think you might be confusing metrics.

    27. Re:Wow by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      Errr - yes and no.

      Having a web device doesn't take much. My son's favorite phone has cost him a grand total of eighteen bucks. Plus, a couple hours of working on it. Some silly little girl broke her phone, threw it in a corner, and my son asked her what the deal was. The "breakage" that she described was minor bullshit. My son picked the phone up, repaired it, put in a SIM card, ran cyanogen mods on it, and he has his "bestest phone evah!!"

      In our throwaway society filled with spoiled children, you should never assume that a person with expensive tech toys actually had to pay for those toys.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    28. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skimp on home facilities and you would be surprised how much else you can afford. These days it seems quite a few prioritize on the go appearances over that place they return to only to sleep and switch clothes.

    29. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to go off topic, the linked story doesn't talk about people eating at Mc Donalds cause it is cheaper. In fact it says some people don't even buy any food there when using the free wifi.

      The linked story talks about one family that has 2 "free" smartphones with data plans, with the monthly cost of over $150. If instead they got voice+txt only plan and a dumb phone, they could afford wired home internet access.

    30. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is spot-on.

      When I was 16, I ran away from home. Because the people I lived with were incompetent, abusive people. For a time I ended up in some youth homes for girls, but later on I was on my own.

      Affording the infrastructure to cook food really is the hard part, when you don't start out with a stable living place, or with pots and pans someone gave you, or with a steady job that lets you pay for electricity or gas to cook the food with. The price of a 12 dollar pan can feed you three times or more, depending on what you buy and how much food you need to live. If you only need to eat once a day, that could be 3 or 4 days. The pan is just metal if you don't have money above what it takes to buy the pan, or a fire and food to cook with it. I would have been more likely to visit McDonalds and get something from the dollar menu than stare at an inedible pan. It wasn't until I was making much more money I could afford the luxury of investing in infrastructure that would pay off long-term.

      In 2000, when I ran away from home, you could still find a lot of jobs in paper job fliers. The trouble back then was figuring out how to wait for a phone call when you didn't have a phone. I ended up in a lot of jobs where I could walk in and be hired on the spot (retail), because better jobs required a real phone to get them. I spent a LOT of time in libraries teaching myself about computers and the web, and because things like the job sites and free email and craigslist gave me a huge wealth of information and ways to communicate nothing else could give me. Having access to a computer at a library in my early 20s is THE sole reason I make 38k a year now, just hitting 30. And 38k a year is a lot, to me, even after paying Chicago area rents. (I know to many of you it isn't. I have a friend who I know makes 100k as a software tester, and I can't imagine what it is to live with that much money.) Making 38k, I'm actually getting fat because I can eat whatever I want, whenever I want. I can just buy food on the shelves without debating what is both the cheapest and what I have the capabilities of cooking. I can just buy random things at the grocery store without checking the price. I have random QUARTERS sitting around that I don't need to use for food. I am so incredibly lucky. Of course, the hard part now is learning how to save when nothing in my childhood or early adulthood nurtured such skills, and I thought I wouldn't see 30 ever.

      Anyway, without libraries giving me free internet, and without prepaid phones coming so far down in price, I would be MUCH poorer than I am now. If you have the internet, and a phone, you can get a job, and everything from there is up. I've looked at the job listings I looked at when I was younger--there's pretty much nothing in them now, 13 years later. All jobs are found online. You HAVE to have a phone and some form of internet to get a decent job. It is NOT a luxury, it is NOT a sign that you are middle class. And you need a bit of money so you can print out your resume at the library or a office store. (Although, in the past, I have gone into interviews without having a copy of my own resume. Because I couldn't afford the paper or ink it would be printed on, as it usually wasn't free like the internet at the library was. I remember making up excuses to myself in case anyone asked me about it.)

    31. Re:Wow by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      I thought this. I grew up without satellite tv, or cable. We had the internet. We didn't have cell phones (although who did in the 90's?), but I did visit the library frequently and check out books to read. From the article, I read it this way: "I can't afford the internet, but I spent my money on a shiny cell phone and tv.???"

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    32. Re:Wow by Minupla · · Score: 1

      You're also forgetting that ppl south of the border have to deal with medical which was in my wife's case 500/mo due to a congenital heart defect. That'll put a crimp in your entry level job budgeting.

      She'll tell you if you're poor, be poor in Canada, it's cheaper.

      Min

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    33. Re:Wow by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      Wish I could mod you up.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    34. Re:Wow by jopsen · · Score: 1

      I rtfa and am quite suprised by what passes for 'poor'. Seems more like people who don't know how to budget and set priorities. Judging by the amount of debt the US has, sounds like par for the course.

      From TFA:

      A third of households with income of less than $30,000 a year and teens living at home still don't have broadband access there

      Families living for that surely can't priorities broadband... They probably priorities food, rent, electricity and clean clothes, is it even possible to pay for health insurance after rent, food, etc.?

    35. Re:Wow by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      They aren't dumb to them. They are still rich after all.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    36. Re:Wow by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      I agree. When I grew up I wore qoodwill cloths. On sale shoes. How much bling are people having? This being said, I know there are hard working individuals who have hit it hard. Nothing is perfect. But from the full article, one person was stating how much they spent on TV (luxury) and cell phone (depending what type luxury). Where is your fat in your budget you could turn into something more useful?

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    37. Re:Wow by damnbunni · · Score: 2

      Uh, 10 Mbps IS high speed internet. I'd sing hosannas and turn cartwheels if I could get 10 megabit internet.

      The best I can get here is 6 megabit, and that's for $2419.20 a month, for an Nx6 T1. That ain't happening.

      If I lived on one of the cross-streets to either side, I could get cable, but they won't run a line up this street because every house has a DirecTV dish on it. So I get 1.1 megabit 3G for $70 a month. At least it's unlimited.

      (And no, I'm not in the middle of nowhere. But DSL just isn't a thing in this neighborhood, and there's only one cable company. Wish I could afford to move!)

    38. Re:Wow by bbelt16ag · · Score: 1

      um, well I just spent about 700$ to get some of my relatives who are destitute, equipment for them to use to get on the net to be productive. So yes it can happen. I also use a prepaid phone for myself that only costs 45$ a month and i get unlimited everything and tether. It can happen they got broadband but no internet at home. ATT has been raping people where I use to live in the woods with those caps.

      --
      NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER GIVE UP! "No limitations, no boundaries, there is no reason for them."
    39. Re:Wow by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Whoa, how do I get in on this? I make a six-figure salary and I just have a shitty feature phone that I paid $15 for after the $50 coupon.

    40. Re:Wow by Seumas · · Score: 1

      No, but after these two presidents for these four terms, we're sure all working on understanding how that works.

    41. Re:Wow by bbelt16ag · · Score: 1

      also you have to look the part as well, nice clothes,car bank account and have a background check to rent a place. I am not even sure i could go one and I have a decent job!

      --
      NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER GIVE UP! "No limitations, no boundaries, there is no reason for them."
    42. Re:Wow by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      For reference, Vancouver is a major Canadian city (3rd largest with about 2 million people in the metro area) that probably has more public transportation than most.

    43. Re:Wow by bbelt16ag · · Score: 1

      well. If they would go to freaking Walmart they could get it for 100$ a month or less. Just need an upfront cost for the phones if the ones they got wont work. Straight talk is the bomb. It even got the sim chips too.

      --
      NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER GIVE UP! "No limitations, no boundaries, there is no reason for them."
    44. Re:Wow by bbelt16ag · · Score: 1

      doubtful, maybe in the single wide, with the 1980 car and 30 minutes from civilization.

      --
      NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER GIVE UP! "No limitations, no boundaries, there is no reason for them."
    45. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i saw a homeless guy with a paygo phone and a box of chicken nuggets, he looked like he was really living the high life.

    46. Re:Wow by Solandri · · Score: 3, Informative

      You might want to reassess your definition of poverty then. Cooking food yourself doesn't just involve purchasing ingredients. There is a substantial upfront cost of buying the equipment and infrastructure to turn ingredients into food. At the very least you'll need to heat water and have a surface that can be sterilized and used to cook on. You'll need utensils and pots/pans. The energy required will be either gas or electric which costs money. I suppose you could burn wood but that isn't free either and is illegal/impractical most places.

      So that $1 burger costs quite a bit more to cook yourself. If you have no equipment and no access to infrastructure then it's actually cheaper to buy fast food. The "total cost of ownership" of the food you make yourself is deceptive because much of the cost isn't directly related to the superficially cheaper ingredients.

      $500 stove with 10 year lifespan, assuming 2 meals cooked per day = 6.8 cents per meal.
      $100 of pots and pans with a 20 year lifespan, assuming 2 meals cooked per day = 0.7 cents per meal.
      $50 set of plates and utensils with a 20 year lifespan, assuming 3 meals eaten per day = 0.23 cents per meal.
      Energy required to boil 1 liters of water from 20 C = 80*4.186 kJ + 2260 kJ = 2595 kJ (I'll assume this is close to cooking one burger)
      Electricity required to do that at 50% transfer efficiency = 1.44 kWh.
      Price at the U.S. average of $0.12/kWh = 17.3 cents.
      Grand total cost per meal = 25.03 cents per meal.

      This country badly needs to teach basic accounting and home economics (real economics, not just sewing and cooking) as mandatory courses in high school. So people don't believe silly arguments to justify eating fast food all the time. Most people don't realize how much money they're throwing away leasing cars, carrying a balance on their credit cards, paying a 1% higher interest rate on their car loan because they didn't budget to save up a bigger down payment, and eating fast food.

      The best argument for fast food is that if you're single and living alone, it can be difficult to use up even a small amount of groceries before the meat and vegetables go bad. The portions you eat are so small that even a single head of lettuce might have to last more than a week. And most people hate eating the same thing over and over, so the ingredients you use for one meal might not be needed again for 2-3 more days. So you end up throwing a lot of groceries out vs. buying fast food which is made from fresh ingredients every day. You end up buying a lot of prepackaged and frozen dinner type groceries instead, which on a cost per meal basis is pretty much the same as fast food.

    47. Re:Wow by MBC1977 · · Score: 1

      You fail to consider that the American (U.S) mindset however is based upon individualism rather than community. Sometimes I believe its both our greatest strength and our greatest weakness.

      --
      Regards,

      MBC1977,
    48. Re:Wow by darkHanzz · · Score: 1

      You'll also need transportation to and from a grocery store which could be substantially farther away than McDonald's

      There must be some sort of culture clash going on here. In Europe, cycling to the grocery store is convenient, vegetables and meat at the saturday market is cheap and of decent quality. Second-hand stores have cheap (and old, but working) pots and stoves. Only the homeless couldn't afford it.

    49. Re:Wow by CAPSLOCK2000 · · Score: 2

      $500 stove with 10 year lifespan, assuming 2 meals cooked per day = 6.8 cents per meal.
      $100 of pots and pans with a 20 year lifespan, assuming 2 meals cooked per day = 0.7 cents per meal.
      $50 set of plates and utensils with a 20 year lifespan, assuming 3 meals eaten per day = 0.23 cents per meal.

      You will have to spend $650 upfront before you can prepare your first meal. That's too much for those below the poverty line.
      Sure, you will save money in the long run, but the start-up cost is prohibitive.

    50. Re:Wow by gallondr00nk · · Score: 1

      Judging by the amount of debt the US has, sounds like par for the course.

      That debt (consumer debt at least) has for the most part been caused by massive falls in real wages for the working and middle classes to the benefit of the rich. Assuming that you aren't part of the 1%, this means your wages as well.

      But you go ahead, keep blaming it on the individual, just like you've been taught to.

    51. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to reassess your definition of poverty then. Cooking food yourself doesn't just involve purchasing ingredients. There is a substantial upfront cost of buying the equipment and infrastructure to turn ingredients into food. At the very least you'll need to heat water and have a surface that can be sterilized and used to cook on. You'll need utensils and pots/pans. The energy required will be either gas or electric which costs money. I suppose you could burn wood but that isn't free either and is illegal/impractical most places.

      So that $1 burger costs quite a bit more to cook yourself. If you have no equipment and no access to infrastructure then it's actually cheaper to buy fast food. The "total cost of ownership" of the food you make yourself is deceptive because much of the cost isn't directly related to the superficially cheaper ingredients.

      We haven't even touched on the subject of cheap food being almost universally less healthy--even if it provides enough caloric content. Then there are food deserts where healthy food isn't even an option.

      And for the "web enabled device" disqualifying you as poor remark; things really have changed that much. It happened so quickly that the older generation who can remember a time before the internet, or before computers, or before cell phones, thinks that owning or accessing those devices is a marker for the middle class and up. It's not anymore. Even the poorest citizens routinely use cellphones. Moreover, they NEED access to those devices/services just to be productive and make any money at all. Access to the internet or at least POTS is so vital that our government (rightly so) has partnered with industry players to make sure free cell phones are available to those who need them.

      If you don't have access to a phone, and now the internet, you are effectively barred from participating in the economy. We can't survive that. We can't function if those people are completely dependent on government services to survive. It actually works out better, is less costly, to give away cellphones and internet access so those people can provide for themselves at least more than they were before. The alternative to not providing those things is paying for someone's entire existence, or if you refuse that, paying to lock them up when they inevitably turn to crime just to remain alive.

      Just because you can find a way to counter argue things because "it sounds good in your head" doesnt make you correct, insightful or intelligent. Anyone can any argue if they simply make vauge comments, not backed up facts and just blabber things in way that sounds really good to them. Youre the type that just wants to argue on the internet and will walk around looking for any excuse to tell people why they are wrong. Then you give this complete break down of why they are wrong without actually saying anything at all to get a cheap smug sense of self satisfaction and knowing you really told them.

      True me, as a bystander in this argument your just an asshole and you have no insight at all into anything.

    52. Re:Wow by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I remember visiting Nicaragua and there being free and/or open wifis everywhere.

      I remember having a conversation about access in the USA, and then some guy started blathering about Nicaragua. Oh yeah? Well in Panama and Costa Rica, access is poor even in many towns, especially in the highlands, and there's open wifi nowhere. That was precisely as relevant as your anecdote. Meanwhile here in the USA I live in a county where literally all the fiber is owned by AT&T and that situation is protected by typical legal protectionism, so my WISP beams in access from four hilltops away so they don't have to use AT&T. I pay $50/mo for 768kbps from choads who can't manage uptime.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    53. Re:Wow by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Wells don't have to depend on electricity, but that's the way virtually everyone implements them even when there are superior alternatives. I live on a property with a well and a water tank. Though there is a place where the tank could have been placed slightly above the house, they didn't put it there. And even though there's a metric assload of wind here every day and this area is zoned ag, they didn't put up a water pumping system including a windmill. I've replaced the pump once because of their generally incompetent piping layout, and partially addressed the piping... but it's a bit late for a windmill

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    54. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps your reluctance to spend money on high end phones helps explain your six figure salary.

    55. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bro i can get pots pans skillets cooking trays etc for less than the price of a combo meal from the goodwill... if you are living in a cheap ass apt you most likely have a working gas or electric skillet. if you are heating your house in the winter you either have electric or gas... getting to the store would be the hard part and for those in a city with mcd's there's gonna be a corner store or public transport or something... i guess if you live in the middle of fucking nowhere it makes more sense but maybe their asses should start migrating.somewhere better

    56. Re:Wow by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're both working from poor assumptions.

      I can find a stove for $100 pretty much any day of the week, and often can get them for free.

      By going to yard sales and flea markets you can amass a complete kitchen for $100. Not only do I see loads of pots and pans for a buck or two, but I have tons of kitchen appliances that I have got this way for a song. My metal-geared krups stand mixer was $5. My vintage GE waffle iron with flip-over grids (makes pancakes, presses sandwiches, etc) was $5. Got a marble rolling pin and slab for $5. Etc. You should also not have to pay more than $10 for a full set of plates and cups. Glasses might cost you another couple bucks, people don't let them go as easily as plates most times for some reason. Silverware is practically free.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    57. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can find a stove for $100 pretty much any day of the week, and often can get them for free

      i had a completely functional refrigerator and gas range/oven that i had to get rid of. offered them for free. found someone that needed the fridge on day 1, but i spent two weeks trying to give the stove away, with no luck. i finally gave up and PAID $25 for it to be hauled off and trashed.

    58. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $800 a month for an apartment? Everyone now has to live in the center of a major city? I paid $200/month for my apartment before I moved to a bigger one. People simply get poor by loaning money to live where they cannot afford to.

    59. Re:Wow by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      I'm probably some kind of monster because I tend to give my old laptops to elderly people on fixed incomes, thus allowing them to "live above their station."

      After all, once they get my ancient Powerbook (worth maybe $100.00 these days) they go from being Deserving Poor to being Undeserving Poor, according to some Slashdot posters.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    60. Re:Wow by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      Where I live we don't believe in Socialist Luxuries like sidewalks, so walking for any distance if fraught with peril. Sometimes fences or landscaping push you into the street, too.

      In fact, there was a scandal a few years back where kids were getting accidentally run down waiting for their school buses in places with no sidewalks.

      (Oh, and in another part of the state, there was a scandal about the number of bikers being run down in traffic, because we also don't believe in Socialist Luxuries like bike lanes.)

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    61. Re:Wow by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you're going to need a truck and repair skills. Let's say it's not that hard to find deals, but how many buyers could enter that market before prices increased or the supply became critically limited?

    62. Re:Wow by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you're going to need a truck and repair skills. Let's say it's not that hard to find deals, but how many buyers could enter that market before prices increased or the supply became critically limited?

      If more people bought used then more used stuff would be repaired instead of discarded. It's probably possible to calculate how many people can do that, but I don't have enough information. Suffice to say that there are more repairable appliances out there than there is demand today. I got a used gas dryer, repaired, for $100.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    63. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you will find the reason it is so cheap to live where you are is because there is no work......

    64. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the right city, apartments can be had for under $400/mo. 4-bedroom houses can go for $50k - $10k in Detroit. Split that 4 ways and it's quite affordable. A lot of homelessness is either by ignorance or choice.

    65. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about an alcohol stove? Just don't drink the fuel. =)
      Alcohol isn't just for drinking or burning, it's good for sterilizing wounds too.

    66. Re:Wow by LMariachi · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not a culture clash per se, it's that most of the US has been designed around the assumption that you have a car (or horse.) In the wide-open spaces between coasts, it's not uncommon to live many miles from the nearest shopping center or "downtown" area, well outside of casual biking range even when it's not snowing or you're not old. Even many major cities have only rudimentary public transit. In some places this is intentional, to keep the poors away from "nice neighborhoods." (IIRC, both the George Washington Bridge and the Golden Gate Bridge were originally intended to have rail decks, which were scuttled by the political influence of wealthy suburbanites. New York-New Jersey connections were later established due to sheer unavoidable necessity, but to this day taking public transportation to Marin county and points north remains only nominally feasible.) Streetcar systems in Los Angeles and elsewhere were killed by a consortium of automobile interests seeking to increase dependence on their products.

      OP does overstate certain costs (twenty bucks will get you a hotplate, a pan, and a place setting at Goodwill or Salvation Army stores) but the gist is correct.

    67. Re:Wow by JackSpratts · · Score: 3, Insightful

      as a politician in a small northeastern city yours is i think the best reason for strongly supporting our public libraries in two critical areas; keeping the hours of operation as liberal as possible, especially during what may be generally difficult financial times, and keeping the facilities technologically up to date. your story is a reason to continue doing so, a primer on the results and, really, an inspiration.

      - js.

    68. Re:Wow by dadelbunts · · Score: 2

      Right. Because i bought an 80 dollar smartphone over a year ago, and a 400 dollar laptop also over a year ago, means i have money to currently pay for internet. Great logic on your part. I guess because i cannot currently afford internet i should throw away my smartphone and laptop because i dont need them anymore right? Sometimes shit happens and you fall on hard financial times. You should take your "book" to an editor, as it seems to be full of idiotic generalizations.

    69. Re:Wow by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Touche

      :)

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    70. Re:Wow by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you're poor and get injured by someone else, it's way better to live in the US.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    71. Re:Wow by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      When you're really poor, you would prioritize knowledge acquisition over things like clothes... if you're smart. I remember having 2 pairs of jeans for 3-4 years. Do you know how cheap it is to live off of rice and beans? Again, it's all about priorities.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    72. Re:Wow by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's kind of sad. It's all this seperation between people and their insane need for privacy that has created a layout in the US that almost requires cars and expensive infrastructure to move people, food, and information. I sure hope there's an answer soon.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    73. Re:Wow by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry. Isn't it government for the people by the people? BTW, hasn't the US always had the highest per person debt?

      As an aside, you need to improve your reading comprehension and read between the lines. Am I 'blaming' the individual if he follows his government's example? Is the 1% to blame because of what you say? Or the government because they allow it? Or the individuals because they allow the government?

      Do you not realize the blame lies with everyone? The solution will never come forward with a USian stance of us and them.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    74. Re:Wow by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      No, mine was relevant. I was talking about communities getting together and insuring everybody has access. Nican's are very nice, happy, open people and are willing to share, maybe because they are so poor. It is an example that it can be done.

      Of course, I'm pretty sure most USians won't open their wifi for fear of misuse, hacking, and privacy invasion.

      It's pretty common, at least on routers i've owned, to have the option to set up limited passwordless access for guests. I wonder how many geeks in different parts of the world have used this function?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    75. Re:Wow by plopez · · Score: 1

      or the sluggish economy. GP needs to be less stingy.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    76. Re:Wow by plopez · · Score: 1

      Laptops are good for job searches and selling stuff on CL and ebay. They're entrepreneurs.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    77. Re:Wow by antdude · · Score: 1

      And how are you today?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    78. Re:Wow by FoolishOwl · · Score: 2

      Then you don't understand poverty.

      Conservatives used to occasionally kick up a fuss about "unfunded mandates". Poor people have to deal with those all the time. One unfunded mandate is that Internet access is a practical requirement for participation in contemporary society. If you don't have Web access, you can't search for jobs or apply for them, or fill out legally mandatory paperwork, or do your homework.

      As we all know, web-enabled devices are bargains, because they enable access to many different forms of communication and entertainment. I remember a furor erupting when a local newspaper, for an article about long-term unemployment showed a photo of a family in a one-room apartment. There was a table, with a smartphone on it. There were a few chairs, and some blankets and pillows on the floor, and no other furniture; no television, no other telephone, nothing. Yet people complained they couldn't really be poor, because they had a smartphone.

      And yes, McDonalds is bad food, and overpriced. Try visiting a poor urban neighborhood sometime. It's a major problem that low-income neighborhoods frequently lack grocery stores, that the only food sources within a few miles are corner stores with overpriced convenience foods and fast food restaurants.

    79. Re:Wow by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      you're happy to have the luxury of water to spare for bathing at all. (No, your coworkers and clients don't complain, they're in the same boat).

      So what's the boat floating on? Diesel?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    80. Re:Wow by FoolishOwl · · Score: 1

      In Planet of Slums, Mike Davis analyzes this at length: that in most of the world, the rich live in urban centers, and the poor have great difficulty affording housing in urban centers. The trouble is, of course, the urban centers are where all the jobs are. So, there are all sorts of messy, quasi-legal and illegal housing arrangements. It's quite common for people to have to pay rent to sleep on sidewalks, for example.

      It's relatively recently that housing patterns in the US have started shifting to match those of the rest of the world.

      Of course, many forms of work can be performed from anywhere, provided there's access to high-bandwidth communication, which would significantly ease the burden on many people to find affordable housing. But that rather brings us back to the problem illustrated in the original article.

    81. Re:Wow by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It probably has more public transportation than most US cities put together.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    82. Re:Wow by FoolishOwl · · Score: 1

      Well said. I tried to make similar points, but you explained them much more thoroughly and clearly.

    83. Re:Wow by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Of course, I'm pretty sure most USians won't open their wifi for fear of misuse, hacking, and privacy invasion.

      That's pretty much how it goes. If the average router had multiple zones maybe there'd be more sharing.

      It's pretty common, at least on routers i've owned, to have the option to set up limited passwordless access for guests. I wonder how many geeks in different parts of the world have used this function?

      I only recently got a router which had that function, and it's hardly my first router.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    84. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers "its what plants crave!"

    85. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That debt (consumer debt at least) has for the most part been caused by massive falls in real wages for the working and middle classes to the benefit of the rich.

      What timescale are we talking about here?

    86. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Places like Goodwill, thrift stores, yard sales, curb side trash, dumpsters, Craigslist, etc... provide cheap enough appliances and whatever that anyone with a few dollars can get. However the problem is transportation and storage. It's very difficult to carry home a stove (though not impossible. Put wheels on a tossed out crate and push the thing along the road. Curse back at all the drivers honking at you.) and you can't afford a taxi. For storage, finding a cheap stove means nothing if you have no place to connect, aren't allowed to have one in your apartment, or are living out of a car. Assuming you can keep it somewhere, I'd recommend a microwave over a car. I've never tried it, but in theory you could take it into another building and plug it in, cook something, then get out before someone complains.

      Realistically, I'd dumpster dive for food.

      FYI: I walk four hours every time I need to see a doctor. There and back, that's a full day's trip. I don't go often.

    87. Re:Wow by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      I dont even live in a city and the cheepest 1 bdroom in someones house, not even a real appt goes for 500-600, If i want a 1 room (not bed room a 1 room) appt im spending no less then 800 and im lucky to find that. where are these 200 a month appts you speak of??

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    88. Re:Wow by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      sure i can get a home for 10K in detroit, it comes with free gang wars and no jobs.....

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    89. Re:Wow by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      The individuals keep voting in people like bush and obama, We get the government we deserve. so yes, we should continue to blame the individua

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    90. Re:Wow by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      This. I moved back home to take care of my father as he was going through some medical stuff about two years ago and sold most of my stuff and recently moved back out into a place of my own. I spent about $80 outfitting my kitchen with pots, pans, coffee maker, toaster, stoneware, silverware, glassware and cookware. I did it mostly going to estate sales. I spent about twice that buying the basics food stuffs. Of that I think my microwave was the most expensive at $15.

      Still though, being single, there are a few things that I can have that keeps well and are geared for individual consumption. But things like fresh fruits, veggies, and deli meats tend to go bad before I use half a package. Even bread will go moldy before I get through half a loaf. I do keep some things around like 1 minute cups of rice and frozen chicken, fish, or shrimp that keep longer.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    91. Re:Wow by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I can find a stove for $100 pretty much any day of the week, and often can get them for free.

      By going to yard sales and flea markets you can amass a complete kitchen for $100.

      Depends on where you live, I think.

      I live in a small somewhat-depressed blue-collar midwest town in the 10000-15000 population range.

      Garage sales, seem to have dried up. Used to be able to find all sorts of things at them, books, music, games, appliances... but now...it's like people aren't replacing their stuff so they're not getting rid of old unwanted stuff. Some of the nicer subdisions in this town once had "garage sale days" where the entire subdivision would schedule their garage sales on the same weekend. You could get nice stuff at those, nice but older stereo systems, geektoys of the upper middle class (stuff like old D&D books/old computers) That's gone now. Even they are keeping their stuff.

      There is a local store that sells gently used appliances and furniture but their appliance prices are high, much higher than I expected.

      The local community-action agency also has a store that sells stuff, the prices there are also higher than I expected for appliances. It is also 36 miles away near their main office. And you need to arrange your own transport/hookup of the stuff.

      Sure you can still get plates/glasses and stuff at resale shops (the local one usually has that available) or Goodwill (though it's 36 miles away) round here glasses seem to be easier to get than plates.

      Now a decade ago...things were more like you describe.

    92. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never mind $650: if you can't afford the upfront cost you can easily do $20 for a decent set of dishes, $10 for an okay utensil set, $40 for a cheap set of stainless steel pots that will nonetheless last a hell of a long time, and get an induction cooker for $75.

      And that's if you buy everything new, from somewhere like Walmart. If you're okay with used (as you should be, especially if you're too poor to afford new anyways; the "always buy new, never reuse" mentality is environmentally and personal-economically harmful), you can probably spend about this much for a proper kitchen set, including a stove.

    93. Re:Wow by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you can find a range by itself, you can bring it on the bus any time it's not crowded. And you can get a small convection oven which will do any typical cooking job short of a turkey, and bring it on the bus as well. Or, of course, in taxi. A refrigerator is the hard part. It's not hard to get a dorm fridge that will fit into the trunk of a taxi, but they tend to be extremely inefficient.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    94. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First you have a houseful of stuff, then you have a few roomsful of stuff, then you have a shed or closet or storage room full of stuff, then you have almost nothing that's valuable replaceable and you're happy to have a roof (if you have one). But guess what? Those sub $500 laptops or old desktop computers are almost worthless, and anyone with any brains will keep theirs as a possible lifeline out of homelessness or unemployment.

    95. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, as always you are free to do as you wish. Don't blame me if I should choose to do the same.

    96. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Props on your journey. Coming up like that, it's funny how quarters sitting around are such a big sign of "doing it right".

    97. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See also: Columbia Crossing planning debacle in present day Portland, OR.

    98. Re:Wow by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, I am in California, but I live in the sticks and even though the local council is hostile to businesses more and more thrift stores have cropped up. Many of them are a bit overpriced, but it's still a lot cheaper than buying stuff new. What I have noticed, though, is the rash of eBay-motivated buyers who show up early. If you don't get cracking at the earliest acceptable hour then you're going to miss out on the good stuff.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    99. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fast food is the staple of people in poverty and the homeless. It's cheap food that requires no preparation, which is ideal if you live in a car or on the street. This is why poor people have such problems with obesity and hypertension because their fast food is high in salt and fat.

      A big problem in urban areas is the lack of grocery stores. All you have are liquor stores and fast food. It's actually hard to get regular food, let alone healthy food. Groups which help poor communities put an emphasis on attracting supermarket chains in hopes of putting decent food within reach.

      It sounds like you may have always lived in the suburbs, you will find it quite shocking when you move to a large city and see what life is like for all the homeless/bums/street people/hoodlums. McDonalds at 6 in the morning is all bums, and people are shaving and bathing in the restrooms after eating what is typically the only meal they'll get all day.

    100. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you get that stove back home? Bring it on the bus? Where do you put that stove if you live in an apartment and can't add appliances to the room?

      You are assuming poor people actually own houses and have trucks. They don't have those things.

    101. Re:Wow by Technician · · Score: 1

      I have 2 routers. It's easy to pick up a cheapie at Goodwill. One is fully encrypted., the other has limited connections.. 1 for my guests. It's off when I don't have guests. Prevents copyright infringement cases and other legal liabilites the US citizens are subjected to if sharing a connection with guests.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    102. Re:Wow by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I guess I am just used to the way things are here in Australia where even the CBDs of the largest cities have plenty of supermarket choices alongside the fast-food options. Heck, I dont know of anywhere in Australia where there is fast food within easy reach but not a Woolies, Coles or other supermarket.

    103. Re:Wow by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Actually, a used phone or laptop is a lot less expensive than an apartment. Sometimes you can find them in the trash. And some homeless people are quite adept at finding things in the trash.

    104. Re:Wow by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add the cost of a house to store all that stuff. I think you forgot that we are talking about homeless people here.

    105. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even many major cities have only rudimentary public transit. In some places this is intentional, to keep the poors away from "nice neighborhoods."

      DC has a nice modern subway system; despite the fact that it passes right underneath Georgetown (very affluent area), there's no stop there. The residents made sure of that.

    106. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to spell it out, people usually become homeless when they no longer have income. Most folks will burn through some assets (e.g. their 401K) to avoid becoming homeless but not all. They may keep assets such as the laptop or cell phone they bought two years ago back when they had a job. If such assets can help them get a job or access social services then of course they would hang on to them, especially if selling said assets would not permanently improve their situation. That's actually very smart behavior: "Don't sell your bootstraps". :)

    107. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the oven and ingredients aside, the rest of all equipment you need to cook for yourself (and not just straight basics like a pan and flipper, but pretty much anything found in any modern kitchen) can be obtained for ridiculously cheap prices. You won't exactly get 5-star-chef quality stuff, but seriously, just hit up a thrift store. You could literally buy a perfectly usable frying pan for $2. Any utensil-type things will be 25 cents to a buck. Even electric things like toasters and blenders will be under $20.

      If someone doesn't have a ton of money, they just have to not be hooked on everything they buy being "new", and you can make out pretty good.

      It also helps to tinker with old, broken things, so that if something stops working, there's at least a half-assed decent chance you can either repair it, or determine if it actually does need to be replaced on your own.

    108. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How am I supposed to go to a yard sale when I don't live in the suburbs? How am I supposed to head to a flea market when I'm scheduled the only days they're open? It doesn't really matter, though, since the buses don't head there anyway.

    109. Re:Wow by jopsen · · Score: 1

      When you're really poor, you would prioritize knowledge acquisition

      No, you should prioritize knowledge acquisition. But no human who works 40 hours a week (if not more) has the capacity to be perfect.

      Again, it's all about priorities.

      It's probably not impossible to climb the social ladder to the middle class with with priorities and hard work, just saying that it's so hard that for those who do climb the ladder it's probably more a question of luck, hard work and priorities.

      Anyways, parents with very little to prioritize with, will often make mistakes (we all do), the difference is that their consequences is much greater than those we face... And it hurts innocent teenagers.

      I remember having 2 pairs of jeans for 3-4 years

      Try that with a teenager :)
      - just saying...


      To sum up: internet makes it easier to climb the ladder to the middle class, when some people who needs it can't afford (or prioritize perfectly) internet, society is the big looser as the poor will remain poor.

    110. Re:Wow by heefeneet · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers "its what plants crave!"

      You call that "Congress", I believe. We call it "Parliament".

  4. Re:Libraries by Mashiki · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sorry, liberals don't like it when the churches do things like "donating free space" to help people. They throw hissy fits, and start screaming about a separation of church and state. Well at least they do in the US, never mind that in Canada that churches and synagogues have been doing this up here for the better part of a decade already and it's open to the public.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  5. Re:Libraries by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

    I'm not in the US. I live in the UK and my comments are based on my observation of it.

  6. Re:Libraries by ndogg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sorry, liberals don't like it when the churches do things like "donating free space" to help people. They throw hissy fits, and start screaming about a separation of church and state. Well at least they do in the US, never mind that in Canada that churches and synagogues have been doing this up here for the better part of a decade already and it's open to the public.

    We only care when government money is used to maintain such services, or are the only places for those public services to be available.

    How comfortable would you be if the only place in your town that had free internet was a mosque?

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  7. How does that work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A Big Mac is about $4. How do these kids have money for McDonald's but can't afford a low end data plan? T-Mobile has unlimited talk, text and data (2G speed after 200MB) for $3 a day.

    1. Re:How does that work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "T-Mobile has unlimited talk, text and data (2G speed after 200MB) for $3 a day."

      Yeah, but does it come with a Big Mac? :P

    2. Re:How does that work? by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      A Big Mac is about $4. How do these kids have money for McDonald's but can't afford a low end data plan?

      What makes you think that they are buying anything in McDonalds?
      Also, there is a dollar menu (with cheesburgers, fries, etc.)

    3. Re:How does that work? by BruceCage · · Score: 1

      If you read the article you would have come across the paragraph that said "McDonald's began rolling out Wi-Fi in its U.S. restaurants years ago. In 2010, McDonald's made it free even for those not buying food.". The article does mention that folks will generally feel obligated buy something.

      --
      Perfect is the enemy of done.
    4. Re:How does that work? by urdak · · Score: 1

      The article does mention that folks will generally feel obligated buy something

      When I was a child, McDonalds used to have big signs saying "No Loitering". I asked my parents what this meant, and they told me that in high-priced restaurants, cafes, etc., it is customary for someone to sit for hours talking over a meal (we didn't have laptops then...), while in McDonalds you're supposed to eat quickly and leave.
      When has this changed? Can't the McDonalds operators call the police on you if you sit there for hours?

    5. Re:How does that work? by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Can't the McDonalds operators call the police on you if you sit there for hours?

      My understanding is they generally choose not to, unless they're quite busy, or you're a nuisance.

      I expect it does better things for their public image to let people quietly study there than any amount of broadcast advertising about $1 beverages.

    6. Re:How does that work? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      When has this changed?

      It changed when places like Starbucks began offering wi-fi and tech hipsters began hanging out and chattering each other while writing freelance articles about oversize glasses and the joys of Pabst Blue Ribbon.

    7. Re:How does that work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Several things happened.

      Way over half of a McD's business is via the drive thru.

      Starbucks exists.

      The realization that people who sit around keep buying stuff.

    8. Re:How does that work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They still have signs saying "30 minute maximum stay" in many lobbies. They are explicitly not inviting people to use them as a netcafe; they merely want the cachet of advertising wifi without providing the real cafe experience.

    9. Re:How does that work? by nbauman · · Score: 1

      They could but they don't. I think they made a business decision that it doesn't hurt them to have kids hanging out, and it would hurt them to enforce a policy like that. I assume that if someone got too unruly, they would kick them out.

      In Manhattan, most of a restaurant's business is between 12:30 and 2pm. The rest of the day it's mostly empty. So it doesn't do any harm to have people studying or hanging out.

      And besides, as the New York Times article said, it's unlikely that a group of teenagers will sit in a restaurant for hours without buying something.

    10. Re:How does that work? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      ketchup is free.

  8. Internet is need, not a want. by node+3 · · Score: 1

    As governments around Europe are ruling access to the Internet to be a human right, in the US, our poor must send their children to a fast food restaurant for their needed Internet access.

    We're quite an odd nation!

    1. Re:Internet is need, not a want. by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      needs are things you have to have

      food
      water
      clothing
      shelter

      you will survive without internet, man has done it for thousands of years, its not a need

    2. Re:Internet is need, not a want. by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, you will not.
      Not as an active part of society at least. As involuntarily and essential services like paying your taxes, registering business, all kinds of insurances move to online only, you just can not participate in the economy anymore without internet access.

      Sure, go live in the forrests dependant on no one else. There you won't need internet. But these rights are not made for hermits, they are made for citizens.

    3. Re:Internet is need, not a want. by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 1

      You walk into McDonald's to apply for a job and they reply, "We only do online applications now."

      No joke, it's something people need.

    4. Re:Internet is need, not a want. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      you will survive without internet, man has done it for thousands of years, its not a need

      The majority of people also survived without being able to read and write until a hundred or so years ago. Try doing that now...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Internet is need, not a want. by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      Please look up what need means. "I need xxx" is only half a sentence. Do you need xxx to live? To keep the weather off your head? To cook food? To make professional connections to further your career? "Needs" are not defined by the bare minimum requirements to continue not dying.

    6. Re:Internet is need, not a want. by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Unless you want to participate in the economy in a meaningful way.

      Let me put it to you like this: if you lost your job today could you get another that was remotely in the same class if you did not have a computer, phone or any other way of connecting to the Internet to taking calls?

      Unless you know people - and a poor person probably does not have remotely the same sort of contacts someone working at the level of the average slashdotter will have - the answer is almost certainly no.

      For all practical purposes, Internet is a need in modern society. By your logic, we could say one does not need clothing - after all, they could stay home and never go into a situation where clothing is not optional.

      Shit changed and shit changed fast. Catch up.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    7. Re:Internet is need, not a want. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      they do just fine, well til they get caught, they sell drugs. they provide a service!

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    8. Re:Internet is need, not a want. by node+3 · · Score: 1

      needs are things you have to have

      Things you have to have in order to do something. You need gasoline to drive a (combustion engine) car. You need cheese to make a philly cheesesteak. You need internet access to participate in society. See how that works?

      Have to have to live is just one type of need.

      food
      water
      clothing
      shelter

      Yes, you need those things, to not die (and clothing isn't universally necessary, which is interesting, as neither is the internet).

      you will survive without internet, man has done it for thousands of years, its not a need

      Man hasn't needed the internet for thousands of years. But many of us now do need it.

    9. Re:Internet is need, not a want. by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, governments around Europe are going bankrupt (and USA is also bankrupt), which is not a surprise with attitudes and ideas like that.

      First off, it's a non sequitur. No government went bankrupt for calling internet access a human right.

      Also, how can you say that it's the cause of European bankruptcy, then (incorrectly, as it turns out) that the US is also bankrupt, when it doesn't do the same thing that you are claiming (falsely, again) has bankrupt European nations?

      A right is not something that somebody else must provide you with. A right is ability not to be bothered illegally by government.

      "A bird is not a creature with a beak, a bird is a creature with wings." Both are rights. You're just parroting the silly anti-human nonsense of the conservatives.

      What you are describing as a 'right' is in fact an entitlement and it puts an obligation on somebody to provide you with that entitlement.

      No, entitlements, in governance, refers to whether the money apportioned must be spent in a specific way or not.

      Get your terms straight,

      You first.

      then you'll realise what European governments are doing has an actual proper name for it: discrimination and theft.

      You make Orwell proud! Taxes are legal, and cannot be theft. Theft is only a valid term when something is illegal. And discrimination doesn't play into it. Who is being discriminated against?

    10. Re:Internet is need, not a want. by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      "Let me put it to you like this: if you lost your job today could you get another that was remotely in the same class if you did not have a computer, phone or any other way of connecting to the Internet to taking calls?"

      yes, I lost my job in 2011 and though no use of the internet gained employment at 2 jobs (one temporary and one permanent) that paid more and actually fit my personal interests with little more than showing up to a employment agency daily

      its called getting off your ass, during the height of the under-employment propaganda I never spent more than 1.5 months unemployed, I didnt wait for email, I showed up standing at the door while the employment agencies were unlocking them and planted myself as a constant nuance.

       

    11. Re:Internet is need, not a want. by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a miserable slog, and it makes you sound incredibly inefficient if its true.

      Frankly, with modern tools - Internet - it shouldn't take you more than 2 hours a day when looking for work. That's the point of diminishing returns - in 2 hours if youre reasonably quick you can apply for dozens of jobs. You should, after that point, look at developing new skills, doing things you don't usually get a chance to because of work needs, spend time with friends and family where you can, and basically enjoy life on the cheap since you won't often be unburdened by a job.

      You, on the other hand, claim you planted yourself at one agency for at least 1.5 months - the maximum span of your unemployment - on the off chance that agency would be the one to get the job you were qualified for. You didn't spend that 9-5 every day wait learning new skills (how could you, without a computer or phone and without being disruptive in their office) or doing anything useful at all, like checking in with dozens of other agencies. And you actually think of this as virtuous!

      But hey, your super job method only took you 1.5 months of wasting your day sitting at an agency, if what you say is true.

      Oh, also, it's cute how you call it unemployment propaganda. Stay gold.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    12. Re:Internet is need, not a want. by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      Both arguments are speaking of different things. Survival and living and easy living are three different things.

      Technology makes things easier if you learn how to use it. If not it's just something else to worry/ bother yourself about.

      People who say you can easily survive without these technologies have usually a conviction of personal experience, and wholly misses the point; society has expectations (having a phone #) and many of these expectations rely on infrastructure you must get access to.

      Survival doesn't enter into it. It's like joining a monastery. It's not for the majority, and has little to do with the expectations and opportunities in society. By becoming a monk you effectively move yourself out of or to the fringe of society. A conviction.

    13. Re:Internet is need, not a want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And some people steal land from it's rightful owners and they call it "immigration".

  9. Actually pretty useful as a backup by puregen1us · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Given that the McDs connections are pretty fast, and pretty reliable, it's actually handy to use as a backup.

    Couple of years ago the connection at home was being flaky and finally gave out. Problem was, it was a major DR test day at work, and I needed to be online from home for 12 or so hours.

    I just grabbed the laptop, blackberry, and powercord, and went 5 mins down the road to the 24hour McDs. Sat there for hours til my ass was numb, happily on my work BB using hands-free, and worked away for hours.

    I wasn't disturbed, had unlimited food and drinks available. Really, not the worst place to work at all. I had more space there than I get at my desk job, and better food and drinks too. Work don't have iced tea on tap.

    The McDs connection was enough to remote desktop into my XP desktop at work, without lag or dropping. I was impressed how stable it was. Most places can't handle basic browsing that well given the number of people sharing, but that was totally solid.

    1. Re:Actually pretty useful as a backup by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I wasn't disturbed, had unlimited food and drinks available.

      Where did you manage to find food in a McDonalds?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Actually pretty useful as a backup by gravis777 · · Score: 2

      I was thinking the same thing - although you don't even need to go inside. A couple of years ago, my internet connection at home went down, and there were no 24 hour places near me. I just went and parked in the McDonald's parking lot for a couple of hours, using their connection.

      They are also handy at airports that still charge for WiFi (yeah, there are a few). Just go to the McDonald's in the terminal, and you can use their WiFi for free, instead of having to pay the $5 an hour to the airport. And at several airports, I find the MdDonald's WiFi to be faster and more reliable than the airport's.

      Another nice thing is that I have NEVER had an issue with the WiFi at McDonald's, whereas the WiFi at places like Starbucks, Taco Cabana, Denny's and iHop is usually down, or there is something wrong with their router - you can see the SSID, but it refuses to give out ip addresses (I think that whoeve set them up probably set too high of a time-limit on leased IPs). Considering that McCafe has just as good (actually I think better) coffee than Starbucks at half the price, and many newer McDonald's actually have a business-class theme, it is a great place for mobile computing.

  10. Re:Libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a personally offensive, childish post, bordering on hate speech against Christians. You are very lucky SlashDot doesn't provide me with a 'report' button in its comment sections.

    In the meantime: As a very progressive person politically, I want you to know that I will be at Church tomorrow morning for about five hours -- probably longer than you will be; that is, if you go to church. There won't be one single person at my Church tomorrow who would throw a "hissy fit' over sharing their wifi with anybody -- in fact, my Church quietly provides wifi 24/7 to anyone located nearby as a community service. We also have hours during the week when anybody can come in and use our recreation hall to study. We regularly petition City Hall and our school boards, to keep libraries and schools open longer hours. Lots of Churches (and their members) in my community do the same things. I wonder; what do Christians do in your community?

    I don't know why SlashDot insists on labelling me as 'anonymous coward.' I am logged in. My user name is 'scribble.'

  11. OH I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These poor kids cant possibly afford internet, but somehow dress better than me, have a better celphone than me, and have a tablet to boot

    my bad I thought a 80$ a month phone was MORE EXPENSIVE than 20$ a month internet

    1. Re:OH I see by Larryish · · Score: 1, Insightful

      USA-ian here.

      I was over at some friends' house (2 lesbian black women) a few years ago, and they had an other visitor.

      Their visitor was complaining about money.

      Said person was obese, with professionally done (read: gaudy) fingernails and a ridiculous-looking huge multicolored weave. She carried a Coach bag and a smartphone.

      Her 2 kids were in clothing that looked like hand-me-downs from the Boys and Girls Club.

      Neither she nor they spoke what could be considered proper English.

      When she left, I asked my two friends about her. Unsurprisingly, she was on welfare.

      Then I asked why she had all that gaudy-looking crap if she needed money.

      Their reply was that she had to have that stuff to make herself feel good. They actually both seemed confused by the question.

      Stupidity is its own reward.

      I feel pity for the kids.

      "ABCD-EBT Little Wayne just wants what's best for me."

      Now go ahead and mod me down.

    2. Re:OH I see by SumterLiving · · Score: 1

      Yeppers...and every person on welfare or any government assistance drives Cadillac and eat T-bone steaks with caviar side salads. I absolutely know this is true because tea party members tells me this same story each week. I wish I didn't have to hear this crap but if I called these folks out on their weekly "stories" they'd label me a commie liberal who wants adolf hitler and joseph stalin to be my best friend and mentor.

    3. Re:OH I see by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

      Where the fuck do you live that you get $20 dollars a month internet.

    4. Re:OH I see by glitch0 · · Score: 1

      Comcast is $29 a month for the first 6 months, not that far off. If you're really desperate you can cancel and renew it every 6 months. Me and my roommates did it in college to save money.

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    5. Re:OH I see by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

      Where im at each broadband provider has a section of the city. Im stuck with 100 a month internet cable bundle.

    6. Re:OH I see by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      right... its as if the world was perfect. full of unicorns and ferries until the tea party came around. its all bushes fault and the tea party, no one else is to blame.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    7. Re:OH I see by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the tablet was probably given to them by their school.

    8. Re:OH I see by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Wow that is frighteningly racist.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:OH I see by Larryish · · Score: 1

      If you liked my original post enough to grace it with a reply, you'll like this even more:

      Roughly to the tune of "The ABC Song"

      A B C D E B T Little Wayne just wants what's best for me.
      So I will buy his new CD
      And it will make me into a re-re
      I'll be living at ma-mama-how till I am thirty
      A B C D E B T Little Wayne just wants what's best for me.
      But because there once was slavery
      I can blame it all on old whitey
      And all the other re-re will nod and agree
      A B C D E B T Little Wayne just wants what's best for me.

      And here's another one for you, sort of a rap thing:

      "Your son sells drugs and your daughta is a ho
      'Cause you all watch Montel and Maury
      And the Jerry Springer Show.
      But since you're too stupid and lazy
      To actually fix what is wrong
      You'll just whine like a little bitch
      About this "frighteningly racist" song.

      If anybody here didn't like my songs, don't just bitch about it. Get off your sit and DO SOMETHING about it. Let your friends know that what they see is what they'll be, and to turn off that bullshit-drama-show-having mind-rotting television set.

      If they want to feel good about themselves, they can maybe teach their damn kids to speak English so the kids can actually get decent jobs or even start new businesses.

      P.S. And please don't your kids Jaeqwon and Latishonda. Burger King is already overstaffed.

      NOW you can down mod me. You know you want to.

      Just Do It.

  12. Request for info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... what does it take to set up and maintain a McDonald's style wifi installation? Does anyone here know?

    I would think that $45 Billion dollars is a very, very high estimate, for a project that would provide adequate minimal access to wifi around the country, and I am almost sure that McD's didn't spend $45 Billion dollars.

  13. Re:Libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "How comfortable would you be if the only place in your town that had free internet was a mosque?"

    As comfortable as I would be in a church, synagogue, masonic hall, court, library or the mall.

    This comes with the territory when you're not a prejudiced dick.

  14. The local cable company.. by jjjhs · · Score: 1

    The cable company wants at least $10000 to extend to my house, not even a 1/4 mile outside their coverage area. I look at the telephone poles recently down the road, and there are new strands of cable co wiring on top of already existing cable co wiring and I am sure only one cable company exists. They could have used that labor and wire to extend to my house instead. Even if I paid them the money what guarantee do I have to the viability of the signal for both internet & TV and what if a storm takes it down? Oh, and all the wasted dollars on stuff like "free wifi" from the same cable companies they could have used a fraction to expand their coverage area. Oh wait, what the fuck is all that USF money going towards????

    Our options are 3G data plans, satellite and dial-up. All are shitty, at times 3G is no better than dial-up and the connection keeps getting dropped and shitty unusable speeds during the day. I try not to do any important financial or other transactions during the day as a dropped connection would be bad news. Many of these sites don't respond nicely to have to reload the page, I could be double charged or something and may have to spend time and gas with the bank to clear that up, more money out of my pocket kept from spending on goods on which our economy relies so heavily on.

    1. Re:The local cable company.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      spend time and gas with the bank

      That seems rather radical, but whatever works for you.

  15. Ob Ron Paul by hessian · · Score: 2

    See, the free market came through where government did not.

    1. Re:Ob Ron Paul by thatisscary · · Score: 1

      Actually, more truth than lies. Given that Cable & Telephone are the 2 most regulated industries in the US... blah blah blah. Of course they fail to provide for consumers, they are state regulated local monopolies.

  16. Those square things made out of papyrus by Spy+Handler · · Score: 0

    the thick rigid ones are called textbooks, the thin sheets with blue lines on them are called paper.

    Kids without internet access at home can take a break from Facebook and Youtube and maybe, oh I don't know, study? Do homework?

    Probably too much to ask though.

    1. Re:Those square things made out of papyrus by Jmc23 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yup definitely too much to ask when the homework assignments are posted or done online.

      Oh wait, were you being sarcastic about something you made up in your head without RTFA?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    2. Re:Those square things made out of papyrus by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      K-12 assignments are not posted online...yet (at least around my parts - friend is a substitute teacher i asked)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    3. Re:Those square things made out of papyrus by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      RTFA

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  17. I can see why they are poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    FTA "Jennifer LaBrenz, a single mom who has take-home income of roughly $2,000 a month, a year ago was paying close to $300 a month for home phone and Internet, satellite television and smartphones for herself and her oldest daughter."

    I earn roughly the same salary and dont have sat or cable tv. I also don't give my kids smartphones, a simple pre-paid plan so I can call them is enough. I also dont drive an SUV so I dont pay as much on gas.

    A side benefit is that instead of watching TV I interact with my family and my kids aren't busy tooling around on their phone so we can help them with their homework and actually talk with them

    Reading this article confirms that some people are poor by their own choosing (or poor choosing).

    We're all not entitled to live like kings, so stop fucking thinking that you can.

    1. Re:I can see why they are poor by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Reading this article confirms that some people are poor by their own choosing (or poor choosing).

      I would still consider that poor, actually. We may not be entitled to live like kings, but living standards could certainly improve.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  18. Re:I love children's asses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have your ass address, by the way!

  19. Re:Libraries by Gordonjcp · · Score: 5, Funny

    How comfortable would you be if the only place in your town that had free internet was a mosque?

    More comfortable than if the only place with free internet was McDonalds. In the mosque there's be less proselytising and the food is better.

  20. Fast food subdomain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've noticed recently that we need a fastfood.slashdot.org, there have been a few fastfood related stories recently

  21. We didn't have any problems by sdnoob · · Score: 1

    getting an education 20+ years ago -- without the internet.

    So, what the fuck is the problem here?

    1. Re:We didn't have any problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a whole bunch of problems. A big one is efficiency. More tangibly the problem is that increasingly the internet is just how we do nearly *everything* these days. Another problem is that there's really no excuse for the state of things except monopolistic corporate greed (ie. corporations with too much power doing what they are designed to do: enrich themselves while providing as little as possible to everyone else). And a minor point is simply national shame: pretty much every other developed country does better at providing bandwidth.

      For an amazing explanation of all of these things check out this talk: Susan Crawford on Captive Audience: The Telecom Industry & Monopoly Power in the New Gilded Age

    2. Re:We didn't have any problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20 years ago the wealth and access of information to young students was non-existent in comparison to today. When kids grow up, they will laugh at the caveman-like conditions in which we were taught.

      The education kids with internet access will get today will far surpass anything we had, in quality and quantity. No more accepting things are true simply because a teacher says it's true. Everything can be cross-checked and verified. No more being limited to the narrow curriculum offered by the school, if the child is so interested.

      The style of education we went through is obsolete. It is not wrong for those kids to want to take advantage of these opportunities simply because we didn't have them.

    3. Re:We didn't have any problems by Jmc23 · · Score: 2

      I'll tell you what the problem is. That awesome education you acquired without the use of the internet wasn't sufficient enough to enable you to find the answer to your simple question either through logic or by RTFA!

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    4. Re:We didn't have any problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting an education 100+ years ago didn't require electric lights, or even very good heating. Or internet!

      What the fuck is the problem here!

    5. Re:We didn't have any problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the technology is NOT producing more intelligent kids.. kids are *DUMBER* today than they were 20 years ago.. why don't YOU do your research, bub.

    6. Re:We didn't have any problems by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 0

      Dumber? Wow, if that's true, that sounds pretty bad. After all, it didn't seem like most kids 20 years ago were exactly intelligent.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    7. Re:We didn't have any problems by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      You mean research like IQ is still on the rise?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  22. Skip McLibrary, go to the library! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I fail to see why these kids are going to McDonalds instead of to the library. Libraries even have open access computers so you don't have to buy your children tablets when you supposedly cant afford to keep an internet connection.

    1. Re:Skip McLibrary, go to the library! by jjjhs · · Score: 1

      As the fucking summary says, libraries aren't open 24/7. Maybe they can't go to the library during the library's hours. The internet is ever important these days likely you can't even get a job without it as many employers ditch paper applications. Even when you buy something, the manufacturer just refers you to their website for information/support.

    2. Re:Skip McLibrary, go to the library! by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

      Mc Donalds is substantially closer than any library here. Also excuse me for buying a 400 dollar laptop and then a year later not being able to pay for internet. I guess i should sell all my belongings so i can better fit your perception of what "poor" people are.

    3. Re:Skip McLibrary, go to the library! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I fail to see why these kids are going to McDonalds instead of to the library.

      # And with the radio blastin',
      she'll go cruisin' just as fast as she can now.
      And she'll have FUN FUN FUN
      'till her daddy takes the T-Bird away ... /#

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Skip McLibrary, go to the library! by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      The tablets are probably from their schools. OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) programs, or tablets in this case, are sweeping the country. Schools get reimbursed by E-Rate for the hardware, and by moving to electronic text books they save money over printed books and the kids no longer get to use the excuse about forgetting their textbooks somewhere. Some schools are using them to do inverted lectures, where the students watch a video lecture at home and do their work in class. But, for it all to work they need Internet connections, which many don't have at home.

      McDonalds come into play because there is a McDonalds, or another fast-food joint or coffee shop offering free wireless, at almost every corner. It's a lot easier for a kid to walk a couple blocks to a fast-food restaurant than to take the bus half-way across town.

  23. Re:Libraries by cognoscentus · · Score: 1

    He was referring to liberals as the hissy-fit throwers, and actually casting Christians in a beneficent light. As a liberal I could report the former, but I believe too much in free speech. As an atheist with qualms about organised religion I do object to them taking over the role of the state, but I'm glad that someone is providing people with the means for self-education. As long as there is no interference on the subject matter (evolutionary biology for example) and no attempt to proselytize this is a good thing.

  24. smart money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another ./ thread overrun by relatively comfortable people smugly defining "poverty", and pontificating as to how the poor either aren't really poor or should just suck it up. Sad.

    1. Re:smart money by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      What about those who lived out of there car at a poverty level. Took it upon themselves to get a minimum wage job. Work hard. Get advancements. Get better jobs. Get a place to live. I have lived in my car twice. In an attic of a house for free, in a chicken coop with no heating for free. I may have nice things now, but I worked for them. I understand there is a problem, I think my biggest complaint is when it says in the article that people are wasting money on cell phones and tv, yet complain of no internet. That doesn't mean there aren't people who haven't had bad luck. But luck is a lot of what you make it.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    2. Re:smart money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about those who lived out of there car at a poverty level. Took it upon themselves to get a minimum wage job. Work hard. Get advancements. Get better jobs. Get a place to live. I have lived in my car twice. In an attic of a house for free, in a chicken coop with no heating for free. I may have nice things now, but I worked for them. I understand there is a problem, I think my biggest complaint is when it says in the article that people are wasting money on cell phones and tv, yet complain of no internet.

      That doesn't mean there aren't people who haven't had bad luck. But luck is a lot of what you make it.

      Youre lying.

      You havent lived out of your car and in attics, in a chicken coop, gotten minimum wage jobs, gotten better jobs and so on and now youre hanging out on slashdot posting?. You are lying about that. Can it happen? Yes its not impossible but its highly improbable.

      You sound like the 8 year old kid who wants to be cool to his friends and straight out lies about everything in a "one up" contest with them. Or an adult who "always has it worse than anyone else" and anytime you have something bad to say they have an even worse story than yours.

      Besides. What in the hell exactly does having lived in a chicken coop have to do with kids going to mcdonalds to get free internet? How does that even relate? You must be jewish cause damn those people always have the worst stories about how they had it.

    3. Re:smart money by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      Than don't believe me AC. I'm not hiding who I am.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
  25. Re:Libraries by Baloo+Uriza · · Score: 1

    Even then, a wifi router is, what, $30?

    --
    Furries make the internet go.
  26. Re:Libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are very lucky SlashDot doesn't provide me with a 'report' button in its comment sections.

    What about the flag? Although, I think that's for something else entirely.

    Sure would be nice to have a real report button, though. Then I could try to get comments I disagree with removed!

  27. Re:Libraries by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    At least as comfortable as I would be if the only place in town were Mickey D's. I mean - how much chance is there that the manager of Mickey D's will force the kid to eat a free Mac-whatchamacallit? And, how much chance is there that the local Imam will force the kids to bang their heads on the ground five times a day?

    IT'S WIFI, for crying out loud. The kids don't have to ENTER either Mickey D's or the mosque.

    Even if the Catholic Church enables WIFI, the kids don't have to go inside to be diddled by the choir director!

    It's a win-win situation, IMHO

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  28. Re:Libraries by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wait - they have FOOD in mosques? Dang - why didn't anyone tell me? I'm checking Google Maps for the closest mosque with free wifi!

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  29. Re:Libraries by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    I've an idea - let's everyone report everyone! I don't like your term "hissy-fit throwers" because it's so very unprofessional. Atheists should be professional, at all times, I say!

    More seriously - what is this "role of the state". Only very recently, in historical terms, has the state had any role aside from keeping the masses under control, while rewarding the rich for being rich.

    Ohh, what am I thinking? That still seems to be government's role.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  30. I'm not surprised by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised at all. Capitalism at its very best! Pffft! I hate Big Telecom!

  31. Apple vs. Android by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    Once again (like in the 80's)Apple was focusing on the "classes" - selling overpriced but stylish tech to those that can afford it, while Commodore et al. sold cheap but functional computers that were purchased by everyone, and brought technology and often education, to the masses.

    We are seeing the repeat of this scenario, where Apple sells overpriced but stylish tech (someone wants to challenge me on overpriced? Bring it on, the margins on the iPhone 5 are particularly succulent data) with the iPhones and iPads, and the more well-off are their customers, even according to some research. Enter Android, a free (and opensource) OS that anyone is free to use however they see fit. An deluge of Android-powered devices include smart watches, cameras, mini PCs, consoles, and of course smartphones and tablets. And among the latter two, we see both ultra-expensive ones (Vertu), high-tech ones (Samsung Galaxy S-III, Note II, etc) and... ultra cheap ones, both from known brands such as HTC, and Samsung, and from no-name Chinese companies. The latter is the one that brings tech to the masses, and for this, I am grateful to Android.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Apple vs. Android by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      too true for 69 euro I have a Samsung galaxy mini Bluetooth wifi and a 7 meg modem I own this not rented from the phone company . It tethers wirelessly or by USB. It is my GPS too.

      To get free internet and free calls and texts I top up by 20 euro for 30 days access for 5 I can buy an add on for net access once I have used my 30 days limited data but if I need the cash for something else I am still connected and being in Europe I don't pay to receive calls or texts. I haven,t had a landline in years .

      Contract phones are lunacy and the Apple option even more so. One thing thou this article does highlight is there is a need for high speed net access provision within the local community McDonalds is not ideal but the cost of providing a dedicated facility and staffing it and heating it is too high to make it viable. It would be nice if someone could post links to any working community scheme especially for rural locations.

    2. Re:Apple vs. Android by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      I have a Samsung Galaxy Gio that I'm crazy about: for EUR 122 (no contract) I get a gorgeous albeit smallish AMOLED screen and all the processing power I'll ever need from a phone.

      Where do you live and who is your operator? (Finland here.)

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    3. Re:Apple vs. Android by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      three in ireland

  32. Software solutions are possible too by CdBee · · Score: 1

    if people are needing internet access to certain sites, maybe its time for a mobile browser that caches, big-style. Interactive sites like facebook, twitter etc can't be usefully cached as the usage is based on direct and timely interaction,but a lot of recreational reading, news, sports, humour and weather could be. A browser set to download 4 links' deep of on-site content for certain predefined sites could save a lot of material in a few minutes to be perused at leisure offline

    Back when we only had dial-up and paid per minute this wasnt uncommon. As a solution to make the best and most efficient use of a scare commodity (connectivity) its still relevant.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  33. Re:Libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is a Mosque not far from me that does exactly that. Anyone is welcome to go in at any time, sit in this nice comfy lounge, which is always stocked with light snacks and juices. They don't try to push their religion on you, all they ask is that if they need some help with something while your there that you provide the help. Usually that help is small things like moving a few boxes around, holding a ladder while their hanging stuff, or helping sweep up the commons area. For the 4 month span I had to go up there for internet access, they never once asked me to help with their religious routines, only with general things, and not very often either.

  34. Re:Libraries by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the UK, but in the USA on average, there's a far higher density of McDonalds and other commercial establishments offering 'free'* internet than there are libraries. Such that I'd estimate that I'd have to travel half the distance on average to get internet at a restaurant than I would to get it at a library. Depending, the ability to eat at the store and/or talk loudly can also be an advantage.

    I'd prefer some sort of project encouraging community level cooperative/customer owned internet access. I've had far better service with coop phone companies than I've had with commercial cable or telephone.

    *Well, technically you have to buy something most of the time.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  35. Re:Libraries by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

    As an atheist with qualms about organised religion I do object to them taking over the role of the state

    In the UK (where the original poster was from) it is quite common for Church halls to be used for secular purposes. They are effectively village halls (often the 'village' in question was subsumed by a town or city some centuries ago) that happen to be owned by the church. They are usually either free or very cheap to use and often the only large indoor space that is affordable for volunteer groups and community organisations. Although they tend to be owned by the church, using them doesn't usually come with any religious strings attached.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  36. Re:Libraries by Seumas · · Score: 1

    Huh? You want to fight to keep the libraries open 24x7? I mean, I agree that would be great, but it isn't financially feasible since the vast majority of people they serve are using it during the day, anyway.

  37. Re:Libraries by Seumas · · Score: 0

    Yes, the poor, poor minority of maligned Christians. Why, with only 80% to 90% of the country being Christians, they truly are constantly on the receiving end of discrimination and intimidation. Poor persecuted intolerant bastards. *sob*

  38. Re:Libraries by Seumas · · Score: 1

    In the US, everything comes with religion attached. Even a bowl of soup for a starving child comes with a self-righteous sermon.

  39. Re:Libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU have managed to close down libraries?

    What on earth, to what end do you close down libraries??

  40. Re:Libraries by richlv · · Score: 1

    why do the libraries fail to provide free wifi then ?
    around here, they do - ok, in most cases you have to sit outdoors, but in summer that ain't that bad :)

    --
    Rich
  41. Re:Libraries by richlv · · Score: 1

    Although they tend to be owned by the church, using them doesn't usually come with any religious strings attached.

    well, a meeting to discuss latest early hominid findings might not go that great, i suppose ;)

    --
    Rich
  42. Liberals and Libraries by rocket+rancher · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sorry, liberals don't like it when the churches do things like "donating free space" to help people. They throw hissy fits, and start screaming about a separation of church and state. Well at least they do in the US, never mind that in Canada that churches and synagogues have been doing this up here for the better part of a decade already and it's open to the public.

    We only care when government money is used to maintain such services, or are the only places for those public services to be available.

    How comfortable would you be if the only place in your town that had free internet was a mosque?

    Hmmm. Don't think you are a troll, so I'm going to toss you a peanut or two to munch on. Haven't you heard of the Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, created by Bush II more than a decade ago? True, Bush used it as a sly way to fund get-out-the-vote programs targeted at GOP constituencies and faced some serious blowback when his first director of the office, John Dilulio, resigned in protest over the political agenda that permeated an ostensibly apolitical office. The office was expanded and renamed the Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships by that arch-liberal, Obama. The OFBNP has funneled billions of dollars of tax money into exactly the kind of social services that you are referring to, via competitive contracts awarded and monitored by a council of secular and religious leaders from around the country.

    I don't think liberals care much at all about *who* is helping redistribute the nation's wealth, as long as it gets redistributed in a way that benefits all, and not just a few. It's a great idea, really, letting churches help. Conservatives who don't like to redistribute wealth in any direction but upwards would look pretty silly if they tried to block money doing God's work, wouldn't you agree?

    1. Re:Liberals and Libraries by Card+Zero · · Score: 1

      I don't think liberals care much at all about *who* is helping redistribute the nation's wealth, as long as it gets redistributed in a way that benefits all, and not just a few. It's a great idea, really, letting churches help.

      Good point--but it often happens that churches will deny access to social services to individuals that do not fit the church's definition of acceptable conduct (disclosure: I worked for a church with a homeless ministry--part of my job was connecting people with social services in the area). This could be something as simple as not being a member of the church, or something more fundamental like being gay or having a child out of wedlock. It's one thing if the church is prioritizing distribution of Sunday's collection plate offerings, but if it's taxpayer dollars then discrimination of this sort should not be tolerated.

  43. Key question by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    My question is, why haven't they finished their homework by the time the public library closes? The public libraries around me are open until 9 or 10 pm. You should be able to finish your homework long before then.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    1. Re:Key question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My question is, why haven't they finished their homework by the time the public library closes? The public libraries around me are open until 9 or 10 pm. You should be able to finish your homework long before then.

      That's nice. Mine closes at 7 and has a 30 minute PC time limit. Gee, I guess not all gov't services were created equally.
      I guess I should be happy though since it's the first town library I live close enough to that I don't have to drive like those (carless) kids would.

    2. Re:Key question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The company I work for sells products to libraries that often list the hours they're open. You'd be surprised how many communities/towns/small cities have very bizarre public library hours. Every day might have different hours. Many of them close at 5 or 6pm. Aren't open on Sunday at all. Some don't open until noon or 1pm. Some are open 8am-10am, close, then open up again at 2pm, close at 6pm. That's on Wednesday. On Thursday they close at 4pm... Etc.

      Get the picture? Can you imagine many kids planning out library time with that sort of BS? "Oh eff that, I'll hit up McD's with my phone..."

    3. Re:Key question by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      The town I used to live near, back 30 years ago had library hours like that...very annoying.

      And here in this town, the local library has reduced hours at least twice. They used to be open on Sunday and till 9 on weekdays!

  44. Re:Libraries by xaxa · · Score: 1

    Although they tend to be owned by the church, using them doesn't usually come with any religious strings attached.

    well, a meeting to discuss latest early hominid findings might not go that great, i suppose ;)

    The Church of England (which owns most of these buildings) wouldn't care about that.

  45. People forget about our current debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But that's okay, because what's another 45-billion dollars when we already have 17 trillion and counting in debt? Heck, let's just throw a free seat on the space shuttle for everyone to ride to the moon because it's everyone's right to go there. The internet is not required, even in silicon valley. I have lived in silicon valley for almost a decade now and have even spent 2-years without it. There are still libraries even in school. What schools need to do is provide the means to do homework without the internet. I used to have encyclopedias at home, but now people rely too heavily on the internet to do the work for them. I'm not saying the internet is bad, hell, I make a good profit off of building websites but it's just propraganda. People don't need the internet to get by these days. Is it useful? Absolutely! Would it be bad if we didn't have it? 99% of teenagers wouldn't get to see porn and that would make them sad but not me. Can people get around without the internet? Without a doubt.

  46. Re:Libraries by stenvar · · Score: 2

    Sorry, liberals don't like it when the churches do things like "donating free space" to help people.

    No, liberals don't like it when churches use government funding to pretend that they are "donating" something to help people. Neither do libertarians, or sensible conservatives. And a lot of "church help" boils down to just that: government funding funneled through religious organizations in order to promote their own agenda.

    never mind that in Canada that churches and synagogues have been doing this up here for the better part of a decade already and it's open to the public

    I know this may come as a shock to you, but the Canadian political system or society, is in fact, not everybody's idea of the ideal society.

  47. Internet deprived? by stenvar · · Score: 1

    The article says these kids go to McDonalds after the public library closes (where they already get free Internet access).

    If this is really such a hardship, why not keep school and/or the public library open a little longer?

    1. Re:Internet deprived? by OldSport · · Score: 2

      Because that would cost money, and getting people to add costs to a public school budget these days is nigh impossible.

    2. Re:Internet deprived? by stenvar · · Score: 1

      It's local taxes and local decision making. If people don't want to pay that money for their own kids, that's their choice.

      I don't see why the federal government needs to come in with rural Internet access initiatives if people locally are too cheap to pay for it themselves.

    3. Re:Internet deprived? by OldSport · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty simplistic view. We're talking here about the people who are disadvantaged in the 1st place – they tend not to get too much representation in the public sphere as it is. The people who tend to pull water at school board meetings, Townhall meetings, and so on also tend to be the people who have enough money to afford their own private Internet -- not the kind of people the article is talking about. So I guess my question to you is, when you say it's "their choice", who, exactly, are you referring to? The phrase "tyranny of the majority" exists for a reason.

      And if you can't see why rural Internet access initiatives are necessary, then I have to wonder if you have ever experienced what it is like to try to get high-speed Internet in rural areas. My mother and stepfather live in a somewhat rural area and are stuck on dial-up because there is one company that offers high-speed Internet and the overhead for the equipment, installation, and so on reaches into the thousands of dollars. I'm not making this up – I was actually planning on buying them high-speed Internet access for a present a couple of years ago, but gave up pretty quickly when I saw how much it would cost. If balking at thousands of dollars makes me cheap, though, I would definitely be curious to see your paycheck.

    4. Re:Internet deprived? by stenvar · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty simplistic view. We're talking here about the people who are disadvantaged in the 1st place – they tend not to get too much representation in the public sphere as it is. The people who tend to pull water at school board meetings, Townhall meetings, and so on also tend to be the people who have enough money to afford their own private Internet

      I see. So you're saying that these people are just not full adults; they are incapable of speaking up for themselves of voting. So good people like you need to take pity on them and tell them what to do and shovel other people's tax dollars their way. Do you know how f*cking arrogant that is? And if the school boards and city government around here are any indication, your "facts" are wrong too; most people with money don't bother going because they have better things to do. They do, however, vote against increased taxes when spending gets out of control.

      My mother and stepfather live in a somewhat rural area and are stuck on dial-up because there is one company that offers high-speed Internet and the overhead for the equipment, installation, and so on reaches into the thousands of dollars. I'm not making this up

      And they also pay hundreds of thousands of dollars less for their home than they would near the city, let alone in the city. You think about that when you choose where to live. I bought a nice place without Internet access, and paid thousands for a microwave link. I still came out ahead. So do your mother and stepfather.

      If balking at thousands of dollars makes me cheap, though, I would definitely be curious to see your paycheck.

      No, you're just greedy. You want the nice and money-saving aspects of country life, but you don't want to pay for the costs that come along with it.

    5. Re:Internet deprived? by OldSport · · Score: 2

      OK, so let's say it is "just a matter of keeping the schools open later". How much later? Is it going to be a computer lab, or some other part of the school? Who is going to stay and supervise the kids? How much extra is it going to cost to keep everything open and running? Are all the school hours going to be extended, or just a small number of the schools? How are the kids who stay later going to be transported (assuming they ride the bus or something like that)? What about kids who have extracurricular activities? And so on and so forth. The point being is that "just keeping the schools open later" is a lot more of a complicated process that you seem to think. You talk about arrogance, but I've done a lot of work in education – and a lot of work with the logistics thereof – and there's nothing more arrogant than someone making those kind of simplistic suggestions without the slightest consideration as to what is actually involved.

      As for the rest of it, you and I seem to live in very different versions of the same country. Where I live, people live out in the countryside because property taxes in the more "urban" areas are cripplingly high, and town meetings/school board meetings tend to be monopolized by the same old yuppie morons who don't have the slightest clue about what it's like to be really, truly poor. But anyway.

    6. Re:Internet deprived? by stenvar · · Score: 1

      OK, so let's say it is "just a matter of keeping the schools open later". How much later?

      As far as I'm concerned, not at all. Kids can do homework at school and at the public library during normal working hours. That's more than enough. This is a fabricated problem and fabricated outrage. Apparently, local school boards and library boards think the same.

      . Where I live, people live out in the countryside because property taxes in the more "urban" areas are cripplingly high

      Yes, taxes in urban areas are very high, and life in rural areas is much cheaper. Now, tell me: how does that translate into a need for the nation to subsidize Internet access in rural areas? Why should the people who already pay high taxes pay even more so that people in cheap, low-tax rural areas pay even less?

  48. Moron by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, you need 650 dollars up front in your simplistic example. Gas/electricity of course just arrives for free and has no upfront costs in your silly world of moronic idiots who don't know what they are talking about.

    Being poor is about not HAVING any money to spend. A classic example is the washing machine. Going to a laundromat is far more expensive AND time consuming but until you can afford the upfront cost of a washing machine, you have little choice but to try to save up for one while spending the higher amount of laundromat. Say you got a budget of 10 dollars for laundry per week. The laundromat costs 9.50, using your own washing machine costs 500 up front and 5 dollars per wash.

    The person who doesn't have 500 dollars, has to use the laundromat and can only save up 50 cents per week. To save up the 500 dollars needed to buy a washing machine, takes years.

    That is assuming said person even lives somewhere where it is possible/allowed to run a washing machine. A moron like Solandri will no doubt suggest to not wash your clothes and save up for 50 weeks those 10 dollars and then buy a washing machine. No doubt as the spoiled little rich white kid he will just say to get your mom to do it. He did. But if you do not wash your clothes for a year, you will go through clothes a LOT faster and most likely loose whatever job you have.

    It is well known that the richer you are, the cheaper you can life. Even Terry Pratchett wrote about it with Sam Vimes Boots theory of economic injustice. It goes something like this: If you can afford 100 dollars for a pair of boots, you will have a pair of boots that will keep your feet dry for your life and can pass on to your children. If you can only afford a 10 dollar pair, they will leak with in six months and begone in a year. So the poor man spends more on boots then the rich men but still has wet feet. And no, you can't go for 10 years without boots to save up for a good pair.

    What morons like Solandri fail to understand is that being poor means you don't have money. You would think this is fairly easy to understand concept but people like Solandri are really dumb indeed, they think poor people just want to be poor and could just get the money somewhere by magic if only they tried.

    You can see how stupid Solandri is by not including the fixed costs of utility services, they charge a flat fee on top of which you pay for actual usage. He is a classic spoiled little rich kid who moans about the poor but doesn't know the price of milk.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A moron like Solandri will no doubt suggest to not wash your clothes and save up for 50 weeks those 10 dollars and then buy a washing machine.

      i'd suggest washing your clothes in the bathtub or a bucket for pennies instead of wasting $40/month washing your clothes at the laundromat.

    2. Re:Moron by Jiro · · Score: 1

      Washing clothes in the bathtub takes extra time, and time isn't a free resource either, especially to the poor, whose job may not be 9-5.

    3. Re:Moron by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      I am with you until you called him a "spoiled little white kid" how do you know he is white?

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    4. Re:Moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you have time to go to the laundromat and sit and read magazines while your clothes are in the machine, you have time to hand wash them.

      yes, i know some people go do other errands while their clothes are in the machines, but the vast majority of people just sit there and do nothing productive.

    5. Re:Moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you've ever been poor, otherwise you wouldn't be throwing around $500 prices for things.

      I grew up poor. As in, waaaaay the hell out in the country, with a garden, house heated by cutting and chopping wood for the winter, essentially living off the land. And this wasn't specifically by choice, we were working with just about the definition of a shoestring budget.

      That said, we wouldn't buy "new" things. "New" things were for the rich kids in town that I went to school with. Trampolines? Cable TV? Hell, colour TV? We were loooong behind other families on getting some things (not that we ever got a trampoline, but of the few people in school that had one that would allow themselves to be seen with "the poor family's kid", I was amazed that people owned such things).

      Thrift stores, pawn shops, garage sales, yard sales, even the dump was a valuable source for various things. What, you think we BOUGHT bicycles? Gather one or two of them from the dump, piece them together, and there ya go, a bike. Toys? Oh, you KNOW garage sales and the dump were awesome sources of those. Appliances were usually either given to us by other people replacing theirs, or again... pawn shop and the like. My first computer? Bought it off my teacher when he was replacing it. Honestly, I didn't even know what the internet really was until about 1995. Clothing? The only non-thrift-store, non-garage-sale, non-hand-me-down clothing I ever received until I was a teenager was what came as a Christmas present... and even then, I honestly have no clue if it was "new".

      So seriously, stop throwing around "new" prices when talking about poor families' means of obtaining appliances and houseware needs. Poor families NEVER buy new. New is for "rich" people (aka: middle class, a class into which I have thankfully found my way into now).

  49. Re:Libraries by Nikker · · Score: 1

    Well I guess I would be pretty comfortable since it's obvious you haven't supported anything in your community you do feel comfortable with.

    --
    A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
  50. America sucks... by acidfast7 · · Score: 1

    Actually, the real problem is that America refuses to provide a "living wage" for most entry-level positions and that you guys have no remedial social system. Over here (Germany), long-term unemployed people get a housing benefit where they have a small flat including a full kitchen and a communal washer dryer. On Hartz IV (long-term unemployment) in Germany, people can live on roughly €400/mo with this housing benefit. Maybe it's not pleasant, but it sure is better than sending people to McDs for €1 hamburgers. In addition, it's cheaper in the long run. You guys need to gain some long-term perspective.

    1. Re:America sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that after 4 generations of being told that "the rich" want to keep them poor, those long term unemployed in America, who are most certainly living that way, are now trapped in poverty by a cycle of ignorance, crime, and political abuse by the "liberals" they vote for. Democrats in the US have a hell of a lot to lose by eliminating poverty and fixing education.

    2. Re:America sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition, it's cheaper in the long run. You guys need to gain some long-term perspective.

      Absolutely. It flies in the face of their overman, every man is an island mentality, so the American privileged class absolutely refuses to see that they will pay for the irresponsible people in their communities one way or another. Much better and cheaper to pay for costs upfront with a real education, healthcare, birth control, mental health services, and the basic necessities--rather than with security systems, prisons, police, and emergency rooms.

    3. Re:America sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the real problem is that America refuses to provide a "living wage" for most entry-level positions and that you guys have no remedial social system.

      On the contrary, the demand to pay "living wages" to entry-level, warm bodies and sacks of flesh that haven't proven themselves makes it a sure bet that none of them will ever reach the first rungs of the economic ladder.

      Instead, we overpay the entry-level folks and keep them at the level long after they have proven themselves. Sucks for them, but I don't write the laws.

  51. Re:Libraries by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Libraries, with a few PCs you can use are the answer.

    No, no they aren't. Spending the paltry $45B (if we weren't murdering brown people for oil we'd have it in the couch cushions) is the right answer. Remember when we spent a lot of government money to extend the phone system to "all" citizens? (Except those in the deep desert, and we all know they even used to have a booth just hanging out in bumfuck in the Mojave.) It's now time to do that with the internet.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  52. Its as good as a place as any. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really now, I dont even understand why most libraries are still open. Like I have two of them in my area that is farily well populated and no one hardly ever goes in them. Even despite the new and improved library they build that is like 3 stories high its still not used much.

    Libraries in this day and age are a waste. Waste of building space, waste of money, waste of manpower and so on. If it werent for free internet and the fact you can borrow dvds for the poor and stupid trailer trash in my area no one would go.

    And really now lets face facts. Libraries are useless and no one "needs" them. 20-30 years ago when I was in school we didnt have the internet in our area even for anyone at all and my entire middle and high school learned to graduate and learn just fine without the use of it. I fail to see why kids today cant learn without it as well. Hell we had a library right next to our school and the school itself had a library and none of the students actually used either unless their class had to go to one. We sat in there to do homework sometimes and once or twice a year check out a book to do a report on and thats it.

    This whole "We need the internet!" mentality is stupid. You dont need it, you just have gotten lazy and stupid so you want it because you dont want to have to actually remember things. But you certainly dont need it and neither do kids. We have managed to learn the basics in schools for a very long time now without it.

    I would actually argue the internet is bad for students. It gives them too much information, a great deal which is 100% false. School for kids is meant to teach them fundamentals for different fields of study and to lean proper social interactions. I say you dont need the internet for either one at all. What kids need to learn at school should be more linear and constructed, when you open the internet into things you add in too many abstracts that water down the whole learning experince.

    1. Re:Its as good as a place as any. by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I live in an area of Melbourne (Australia) that has a sharp economic divide between moderately wealthy and poor. In my neighbourhood there are new McMansions going up that cost 3-4 times what our house cost 10 years ago, and the random house that is 10 times the value depending on the location. We also have a high number of migrants (mostly asian, indian and african) who are often living in shared houses, typically rented, who have minimal resources, low incomes and virtually no savings.

      A few years back I spent about 6 months unemployed and was a frequent visitor to the local library. The internet enabled PCs were pretty much constantly in use by people looking for work, answering email, trying to use public services that were only available online, etc... The common users were typically either immigrants, the elderly or (judging by their clothes) people who couldn't afford a connection at home.

      Most of the paperwork I need to do my taxes now is all online (including submitting a return). My utilities and bank charge extra to get bills and statements on paper rather than receiving them electronically. Job ads for middle income jobs are almost exclusively advertised electronically. There are hundreds of little ways that we are edged online, and it's happened so gradually you probably haven't even noticed it.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  53. Re:Libraries by Molt · · Score: 1

    This is a personally offensive, childish post, bordering on hate speech against Christians. You are very lucky SlashDot doesn't provide me with a 'report' button in its comment sections.

    Well, no one will think that you're the type to throw hissy fits any more.

    --
    404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
  54. Re:I love children's asses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll see you in prison, mate. We'll be great "friends." ;-)

  55. Re:Libraries by Molt · · Score: 1

    I do wonder about the cause and effect here though, would people who work during the day go to the library in the evening if it was open? I do think it'd be worth having one evening a week of later opening hours and seeing how it went, possibly with added incentives of interesting talks from speakers if there's room. I know some of the London museums have done 'special' evening openings recently and from what I've heard those went very nicely, attracting people who travel into London for work and don't really want to have to do their weekly commute at the weekend in order to go to a museum.

    --
    404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
  56. Re:Libraries by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

    When I was a kid, my D&D group met in the basement of a library. Now, it's possible that before the "D&D is a Satanic Suicide Cult" panic, my church might have allowed us to use their space.

    However, even if they didn't believe in it, chances are they'd say "no dice" after the Moral Panic started, so they wouldn't have had to explain to angry parishioners why they were allowing Satanic Minions of Satan to meet on church property.

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  57. Convenient time limit for patrons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    McDonalds has rigid lobby designs that don't include electrical outlets anywhere customer-accessible. This means kids (and adults) get to stop using the Internet when their battery dies. This is in contrast to Starbucks, etc. which try to provide as many outlets as possible. McDonalds is in the 'net cafe business only grudgingly.

  58. This points out a big problem: by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    Much of the USA has trouble getting broadband because the population density of rural areas makes it too expensive do the "last mile" connection of broadband to the home. This isn't like South Korea or Japan, where the population density is high enough per square kilometer to justify the enormous expense of hardwired high-speed Internet connections to everyone.

    I think if the IRS were to offer substantial corporate tax incentives to get the "last mile" connection--whether by DSL, cable or even long-range wireless not tied to cellphones like 802.16 WiMax--out to rural customers, they could solve the problem pretty quickly.

    1. Re:This points out a big problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your phone companies have already had the subsidies and tax breaks to do it, but they spent it on lobbying for more subsidies instead of building out infrastructure.

      We're not talking about isolated farmhouses 50km from anywhere here, we're talking about decent sized communities that the "free market" has screwed over time and again. I live in an isolated valley in a mountainous, undeveloped region of Europe. The bus comes twice a week, and the nearest hospital is three hours drive away. I have a choice between 8Mbps ADSL and slightly unreliable 50Mbps microwave.

    2. Re:This points out a big problem: by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      That doesn't explain why broadband is also expensive and with little to no competition in urban areas.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    3. Re:This points out a big problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in one of the largest cities in the US and my internet connection still isn't even close to comparable to what you can get in almost any other first world country. Population density is no excuse for large parts of the US.

  59. Re:Libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The difference was that POTS was a stable standard for a long time, high speed internet isn't - we've regularly seen speed increases that would require updating the "national system" every 10 years or so. Also, $45B is by no means a paltry sum - that's 7-8% of the revenue raised by the fiscal cliff deal and works out to around $150/person in the US.

  60. Re:Libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    24x7 is probably not a great use of limited funds, but I like that my local library is open until 9 pm on weeknights rather than just 9-5.

  61. Welcome to the Evidence-based world by herojig · · Score: 1

    Ten years ago I was overnighting in a Starbucks parking lot to send my work in. I was one of many living in vehicles and roaming the US, doing a bit of work here or there. Most of the venues mentioned here were our links to the internet - to our bread and butter. But that's nothing new around the globe, most of the under-developing part of the world has been going to community wifi centers for a long time. I'm in Nepal now, and there is a cybercenter on almost every block within the Kathmandu valley (mostly filled with students). But the sad thing is this: America has not progressed to this point: where even the poor can afford an internet connection in the home, and can certainly find an affordable cyber center within walking distance.

    --
    I think therefore I can't be ~TTNH
  62. Re:Libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't ask for extra bacon on your burger. Trust me on this one.

  63. Re:Libraries by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

    Good luck getting a glass of wine with your medium rare steak.

  64. Re:Libraries by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

    I don't think the glass fiber much cares what's running over it. Just replace the gear on each side of the run as a set.

  65. Re:Libraries by Gordonjcp · · Score: 3, Informative

    Depends where you are. A lot of them do a similar thing to the Sikh community do with gurdwara, where they will have their church service then all have something to eat while they discuss it. I could get to like a church where you spend most of the time eating veg curry and discussing the bits where the holy book is wrong ;-)

  66. Re:Libraries by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    It already irks me that the local public library has such short hours. Like, they close at 5 on Fridays. There should be a law that if there is a sporting event going on anywhere on public land in the county, the library has to be open.

    But the librarians like their 9-5 hours, I suppose. It's convenient that those are the hours that 80% of their patrons are at work and can't interfere with their important librarian tasks by visiting the library.

  67. Re:Libraries by plopez · · Score: 1

    If it isn't sponsored or required it doesn't violate separation or church and state. You're free to pray in school, during finals some students even might be encouraged to do so. But making it required is the rub.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  68. Re:Libraries by plopez · · Score: 1

    The Krishnas have a nice spread too, but they don't know much about grilling a burger.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  69. Gotta change some laws by strangedays · · Score: 1

    In many locations politicians of dubious ethics and room temperature intelligence, have passed laws
    to make it illegal and/or impossible to build a community wifi.

    I realize there are some technicalities and costs to amortize, but really! so what?
    Compared to expecting kids to hang out in fast food joints so they can do homework, or look for a job online,
    how can communities really believe that some shared wifi is a bad thing?

    It's mostly the "asleep at the wheel" voters fault, that's us folks...

    These messed up laws should be reversed at the Federal and/or State level immediately and
    funding provided to make community wifi and broadband happen.
    Plus some serious people tasked and responsible to make sure it actually does and report progress frequently, this is already way overdue.

    We have to choose between allowing our leaders to force us into either:
    a third world style information access (no access)
    or having a well educated and employed society.

    Patriotism, basic community spirit, ethics, makes this seem like a no brainer to me.

    IMHO, there can be no excuses, no apologistas, no rationalizations that justify continuing a monopoly at the expense of the USA's future generations.

    The way I see it, this is also part of the rich corporations strategy to dumb down America, and we need to make an effort to buy/bribe the politicians into changing their "screw the people, if it helps me get re-elected" laws.

    The Europeans have it defined correctly, internet access is now a basic right, a need.

    Suggested action: Let your political critters know that voting for this kind of dumb stuff, is not acceptable, if they ever want your vote.

    --
    There is no god; get over it already! Never exchange a walk on part in the war, for a lead role in a cage.
  70. Rural internet access by rnturn · · Score: 1

    While I haven't read my phone all that carefully lately, I seem to recall that we (Americans) were paying a little extra each month so that the phone companies could provide internet access to rural areas. And, if memory serves, this charge started back in the '90s. That we still have piss poor internet access in rural areas after about 20 years of the phone companies collecting this extra charge is nothing of criminal.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  71. Re:Libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The password to access the WIFI is given out on the receipt of your purchase, valid for one connection.

  72. Re:Libraries by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    Good luck getting a glass of wine with your medium rare pork chop.

    FTFY

  73. Re:Libraries by mcgrew · · Score: 2

    I hate to tell you this, Mr. Conservative, but Jesus was a liberal. Taxes? "Render unto Ceasar..." You conservatives seem to hate the poor that Jesus said "Blessed are" of. Tax money for food stamps? Conservatives are against it. "They should get jobs" you say, Jesus said "look at the lilies of the field, they neither sew nor spin yet Solomon in all his glory was never so clothed." Conservatives love money, but the bible says the love of money is the root of all evil.

    Jesus was a liberal, a radical, Caiphas was a staunch conservative. Why do you think he was crucified? Conservatives hated him.

    Oh, and if you're a lawyer you don't want to know what Jesus said about you.

  74. McLibraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the US ISPs allow open wifi with ANYONE downloading copyrighted Movies, Music and Books, or will they shut them down with 3, 6 strikes?

  75. Re:Libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You confused liberals with Republicans (conservatives). Republicans don't want the nasty 47% to catch a break.

  76. Re:Libraries by aergern · · Score: 1

    That's about as dumb as they get. Liberals don't mind churches doing their share of helping folks.

    What liberals MIND are things like Prop 8 and other such things. I would say liberals do not care one whit about churches helping the public but when conservatives cut off funding for things religious folks don't like yet give churches tax exemptions or funding FROM said state then we get a little testy.

    YOU do not understand what the separation of church and state argument is even about but feel free to comment on it as if you do. heh.

    And UP there in Canada YOU have a national religion. YOU have national languages (or did you not notice everything is in French and English) ... UP in Canada your laws are different because you are still part of the commonwealth ... we however are not. Just is what it is, eh?

    --
    Tell me what you believe...I'll tell you what you should see.
  77. America the pay for my kids wifi too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Country fuck you taxing me for this. If I cant afford something I just cant afford it.
    You want me to pay fot the damn kids electric too you know you need that for internet to work also.

    Fuck this shit. Now you know why you need to grow up and get a fucking job.

  78. Re:Libraries by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    He was referring to liberals as the hissy-fit throwers, and actually casting Christians in a beneficent light.

    Yes, which tagged him as a church-going conservative hypocrite.

    As an atheist with qualms about organised religion I do object to them taking over the role of the state

    As a Christian, I agree. It isn't up to me to judge anyone, and IMO only those things that harm or endanger others should be illegal. I think the worst kind of government would be a theocracy.

    As long as there is no interference on the subject matter (evolutionary biology for example)

    Anyone who thinks science and Christianity are at odds either misunderstands the science or Christianity. IINM the same can be said of Bhuddism and Hinduism.

  79. Re:Libraries by mcgrew · · Score: 2

    Bullshit, for the last two years my church has given two weeks' groceries to every family with a chile at Harvard Park Elementary over Christmas break, because it's the poorest neighborhood in town and school breakfast and lunch is all some of those kids get. No sermons involved, volunteers simply drop off the groceries.

    I don't believe St John's breadline, run by the Catholics here, makes you say grace or anything. They're just feeding poor people. No sermon attached.

  80. Re:Libraries by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

    However, even if they didn't believe in it, chances are they'd say "no dice" after the Moral Panic started, so they wouldn't have had to explain to angry parishioners why they were allowing Satanic Minions of Satan to meet on church property.

    When we used to play D&D in the high school library we were prohibited from rolling any 6-sided dice because they could be used for gambling.

    I'm sure that wasn't what you meant by "no dice", but I never let a good segue pass me by.

  81. Oh yeah, that'll work so well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What makes you think --churches-- of all places would be ok with serving as centers for learning?

  82. Re:Libraries by dala1 · · Score: 1

    When did Canada get a national religion?

  83. Re:Libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Liberals' would be against government funding churches. Don't be dense.

  84. Re:Libraries by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    Good luck getting a glass of wine with your medium rare pork chop.

    That's your problem right there - you don't eat pork medium rare - only well done. Less chance of salmonella or other nasties. The other white meat and all of that.

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  85. Re:Libraries by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    I believe it's trichinosis.

  86. Re:Libraries by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    Which is the theory behind the NBN in Australia. Of course the Liberal party (note the use of the capital "L"), think wireless is smarter because it's cheaper to deploy than running fiber to every house.

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  87. Re:Libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a church-going liberal who has been involved with our church helping many groups, mostly those with no religious affiliation, I can tell you that no liberals have complained during the years I've been working.

    We have had conservatives complain about us offering our services to minorities and foreigners on several instances.

    Separation of church and state is only an issue for conservatives who insist on bringing religion into schools and into government which is a clear violation.

  88. Re:Libraries by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

    Even if you're using wireless for the last 100 meters, having wire or fiber to each neighborhood will help.

  89. US Post Office who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repurpose the post office. Make it their mission to provide communication, in whatever form is predominate, retiring, or emerging. For the 'last mile problem' have them partner with the USDA for further direct partnership investment. As with the last era of the post office tier the service. Mesh networking for anyone, anywhere with repeaters/access point nodes on every mailbox. Charge a premium for more preferred, direct, and "bulky" service. As a mailbox "owner" or "maintainer", the use of the the post office repeater is subject to providing the nominal, necessary electrical power to the device.

  90. Re:Libraries by Seumas · · Score: 1

    I work from home and have done so nights and weekends for the last fifteen years (no, I'm not a male hooker). I wish all government and business entities catered to more than just the 9-5 crowd, but I recognize that it simply isn't justifiable. The extra expense compared to the traffic they'd get in return (though a library would be more popular than most other services, I'm sure) just seems too much.

    On the other hand, if they'd update libraries a bit -- make them open very late into the night or even all night and then open up (by contract) a cafe and coffee shop in one and encourage lounging around and reading, it would be a pretty great night spot and they could do enough business to help with the added costs of keeping them open.

    It might even make me come use the library, which I haven't done since I was a kid because internet. And Amazon.

  91. Re:Libraries by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    I've heard they cook up a pretty good hairy llama, though.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  92. Re:Libraries by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    probably longer than you will be; that is, if you go to church.

    certainly longer than me.

    but using church attendance as a dick-size metric? really??

    you seem to think that attendance to a church is a good and honorable thing. that's your fault; stop thinking that 'stuff I like should be stuff you like'.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  93. A fee for growth and improvement. by gizmo_mathboy · · Score: 1

    If only the FCC had the forthought to have the telecos to charge a small monthly fee to pay for the expansion of broadband networks in underserved/rural areas.

    I bet they could have raised several billion dollars.

    There is also no way that the telecos would just take that money and not extend and improve their networks.

    It is unpossible I tell you.

  94. New Sign Idea by DirtyLiar · · Score: 1

    "Over 20 Million (pages) served!"

    --

    THINK! It's patriotic

  95. "Asian day care" by peter303 · · Score: 1

    A number of suburban libraries have complained that parents tell their kids to hang out there until the parents get home from work. Sometimes the kids get bored and feisty and the libraries dont like it.

  96. Re:Libraries by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

    So your offended and would report the post if you could but claim to be politically progressive. What a surprise. Crawl back under a rock.

    --
    The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  97. Re:Libraries by Samizdata · · Score: 1

    Not so much any more, given a hygenic restaurant.

    And there's citations for you too.

    --
    It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
  98. Re:Libraries by Samizdata · · Score: 1

    Which is almost a non-issue any more.

    --
    It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
  99. Part of the cost of living in the country. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Nothing to see here.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  100. Re:Libraries by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    How does the restaurant being hygenic[sic] affect whether the meat arrives with tapeworm cysts, salmonella bacteria or other contaminants that were acquired while it was still running around grunting?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  101. Re:Libraries by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Bullshit, for the last two years my church has given two weeks' groceries to every family with a chile at Harvard Park Elementary

    Jalapeno or habanero?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  102. Re:Libraries by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Since the first brewery opened there.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  103. Re:Libraries by Samizdata · · Score: 1

    Because, generally, hygienic restaurants are worried enough about details that they will source from reliable sources and will handle food in a fashion to minimize health issues.

    --
    It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
  104. Re:Libraries by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Don't talk wet. Trusting suppliers - have you been under a rock for the last month?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."