Slashdot Mirror


Valve and JJ Abrams Collaborating On Half-Life, Portal Movies

LordStormes writes "JJ Abrams, who apparently plans to direct every movie for the rest of time, is teaming with Gabe Newell and Valve to explore films for both the Half-Life and Portal franchises. 'Abrams and Newell made the surprise, succinct announcement at the end of their keynote speech, which took the form of a carefully rehearsed discussion between the two creatives about the strengths and weaknesses of games and movies as storytelling mediums. ... "Movies let you experience moments that you might not think are the point, but really are everything,” Abrams said, pointing to the early introduction of compressed air canisters in the opening scenes of the movie Jaws, which initially seem unimportant but prove consequential to the film’s ending. Newell pointed out that the “take your child to work” scene in Portal 2 accomplished the same thing, setting up important plot points in a way that made them initially seem like humorous throwaways.' No word on Half-Life 3, sadly..."

45 of 208 comments (clear)

  1. A Portal movie?!?!? by crazyjj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First of all, that is the stupidest fucking idea I have ever heard, even by dumbass Hollywood standards. The whole point of the Portal games was for YOU to solve puzzles in creative and fun ways. Making that into a passive experience renders the whole thing absolutely pointless. I would rather watch an Adam Sandler movie while eating shards of glass, with Lindsay Lohan's week-old panties wrapped under my nose.

    Secondly, does JJ Abrams have blackmail photos of every studio head in Hollywood or something? Because the guy never struck me as particularly talented, certainly not enough to warrant letting him direct EVERY GODDAMNED MOVIE MADE FROM NOW ON. Not since Keanu Reeves has a less deserving motherfucker gotten so much.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by Sebastopol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Good thing this isn't reddit, or you'd find yourself at zero karma.

      I learned not to point out the relative lack of talent of J.J. (and Joss) the hard way.

      I completely agree with you though.

      I don't get it: we've all seen LOST, Cloverfield, Super8, Star Trek... there's no reason for people to not see how mediocre this guy is. Why do they keep giving JJ the prime scifi?

      I'll answer my own question: Justin Beiber.

      +10 for the Keanu Reeves. "Dangerous Liaisons" should have been enough warning.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    2. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by YodasEvilTwin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Fringe is the best show I've ever watched.

    3. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by Bieeanda · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Someone's already done a short Portal movie (search Youtube for 'Portal: No Escape'; I don't want to accidentally give hits where they aren't due), but you're right. It's really difficult to pull off a film where there is only one visible, active actor. It's possible, but while I enjoy Abrams' oeuvre for its flashes of cleverness and all of its ridiculous spectacle, I don't think he could pull off a straight-up Chell vs. GlaDOS.

      Of course, this is assuming that everything is based on the games and not the broader continuity they're built from. A movie about Gordon Freeman squeezing antlion bits, or Chell discovering that the cake is (twist ending!) moist, delicious, and real? No. God, no.

      A movie based around the events of the Seven Hour War, or the events leading up to GlaDOS going on-line, on the other hands? Those, or something strongly resembling those, I could see.

    4. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      John Noble made Fringe great.

      Adapting to a completely new universe (and/or completely different era) in which some of the previous universe may or may not have existed every season grew tiresome. Ir provided for some interesting twists, but it became difficult to care for anything or anyone once you realized they might simply not exist next time someone powers up a mystery machine. Even deaths became meaningless. How could I feel anything for someone who'd probably just exist in another universe or timeline if they "died" on the show?

    5. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First of all, that is the stupidest fucking idea I have ever heard, even by dumbass Hollywood standards.

      I guess you haven't heard about: Battleship. It really is based on the table top game.

    6. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by mythosaz · · Score: 2

      The answer is simple. He's a classic home-run hitter.

      Most of his hits are "Alcatraz" pop-ups caught just past the infield. But you only make hundreds of millions if you get your home run to syndication - and for all the Alcatraz pop-ups, he keeps hitting a fair amount of Person of Interest home runs.

      Swing for the fences!

    7. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by mythosaz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Best Battleship review I saw:

      MISS!

    8. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by N0Man74 · · Score: 2

      Eh, I agree that a Portal movie seems rather weak. Portal is brilliant, and is a great game experience, but I just don't think a movie, novelization, comic book series, cartoon, would be an appropriate medium for it.

      However, if you think that this is anyway the stupidest idea that Hollywood has ever come up with, then I envy your sheltered life.

      The Half-Life series might could work as a movie... maybe. It would be a cheesy film horror action/adventure/horror movie, but I could see it working.

      I'm reluctant to comment on Abrams, since I've only seen a fraction of his work. I loved Fringe and Super 8, never saw Lost, and I thought Star Trek was very uneven (a few great traits buried in over-the-top fan-service to the point that it was nearly a parody of itself).

    9. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They all die in the end, its quite sad.

    10. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by jxander · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Interesting...

      I was going in the exact opposite direction with that. I would consider JJ a high percentage batter. Lots of base hits, very few strikeouts. Of the things I've seen, JJ produces perfectly serviceable works, with no colossal flops. Lost was pretty good. Started out a bit above average, imo, but suffered due to the writers strike and some making-shit-up-as-you-go. Super8 and Star Trek were both good movies. Nothing spectacular, but both enjoyable. Same thing with Mission Impossible: decent flick, while certainly not setting Hollywood ablaze. Cloverfield was a good premise, and really only suffered to due the shaky-cam...

      Perhaps that's why he's so popular right now. Studios aren't willing to "swing for the fences." They want a steady hand that will ensure decent returns.

      --
      This signature is false.
    11. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have to agree with you. Abrams isn't going to make another Metropolis or 2001 or Casablanca or you name it. Abrams isn't even good at doing science fiction. I refuse to recognize the new Star Trek film as science fiction, because it isn't. There are already comments here and there are surely comments to come that need to pull back and get some perspective.

      What he's good at doing are action movies that are based in geek culture. Star Wars is probably the most relevant franchise in that vein for him to do, but once you get some perspective, Star Trek (the new one) was actually a good movie. It wasn't a good sci-fi. It was a good action movie. There's definitely enough in Half Life that's aliens-esque for him to be successful. What it's not going to be is a resonance cascade followed by two hours of a man in an HEV suit running around with a crowbar. What it could be is a resonance cascade followed by two hours depicting, as another poster pointed out, the events of the seven hours' war.

      For that matter, there are other games that take place after the resonance cascade from different viewpoints. Why would an Abrams Half Life movie even need to be from the Freeman's (*ducks*) perspective anyway? What about the Xen? Where does the nihilanth fit in with all this? What about the G Man, his "employers," and why are the Xen trying to steal our crowbar wielding hero away from him?

      I guess what I'm saying is there's tons of stuff to work with in the Half Life universe (not to mention the Borealis for the Portal tie-in, which appears to have teleported the same place that HL2 ep 3 went: nowhere). I think he'd make it a fantastic action thriller about an extra-dimensional invasion.

      It's not going to be hardcore sci-fi, though. Once you stop expecting it to be, you can have some fun and enjoy the ride.

    12. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, the mortality rate of humans is only 93%.

      http://what-if.xkcd.com/27/

    13. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If youtube has taught us anything, it's that you must be direct and over the top, or nobody will care. JJ is like that. The summary implies that he only recently discovered foreshadowing and thinks it's a really cool thing. All his stuff strikes me as if he's a 12 year old. It works because so many adults are 12 year olds, but it's almost to the point of intelligence insulting (why so many here don't like him). I wish people would stop pointing him out. Now, when I see a JJ movie, I picture him smoking weed, drinking Mountain Dew and muching cheetos repeating "then we'll have an even bigger ice monster come out and eat the one chasing Kirk" "but sir, on an ice planet, the largest creatures wouldbe smaller because there wouldn't be enough biomass to support them." "But it'd be fucking cool. He he he he."

      There was never a lamer example of his subtilty (and lack of logic) to have the larger creature kill and discard the one chasing Kirk, only to go after the smaller creature it was chasing. That's like a lion abandoning a recent gazelle kill to chase a mouse. It'd never happen. But he breaks all laws of physics and nature if he thinks it will cause a thrill. That's why people don't like him. That, and he's stuck in camera trick heaven. Lens flair, shakey cam, and all that. It breaks the 4th wall for many of us, not drawing us in as he asserts it does.

      But it's simpler and more likely to be read if I just say "JJ is a hack who huts that which he touches." Immature and childish, but more likely to be read and understood.

    14. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by dywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People disagree with me about movies!
      They're all idiots to not agree with my clearly superior intelligence!

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    15. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by Antipater · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He was making a movie based on a TV show where characters would routinely say things like "Sir, the surface of the planet is negative four hundred degrees Celsius." Please don't look for scientific realism in anything Star Trek related.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    16. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by Sebastopol · · Score: 3, Funny

      YOU understand me! /hug

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    17. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by Sebastopol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      FTFY:

      "he's currently the best Hollywood teeniebopper action flick screenwriter currently alive."

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    18. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by LateArthurDent · · Score: 2

      Fringe is the best show I've ever watched.

      I'm sorry.

      I don't think I've ever recommended to anyone that they should watch more TV, but in your case, I don't think there's any harm, since you obviously don't watch much. Have you, in fact, watched any other shows?

      If you ignore reality TV, there's not much of anything worse than Fringe.

    19. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Moon might be a better example.

    20. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In other words, it's because he's mediocre that he's getting so much work. Mediocre sells. Brilliant work is practically doomed to be appreciated by a cult following and no one else.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    21. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by nabsltd · · Score: 2

      But you only make hundreds of millions if you get your home run to syndication - and for all the Alcatraz pop-ups, he keeps hitting a fair amount of Person of Interest home runs.

      Person of Interest is not a J.J. Abrams product. Yes, he's "executive producer", but he has had no real creative input (writing or directing credits). Jonathan Nolan is the force behind PoI, and the actual show-runner.

      Compare this to the things he has actual creative credit on, where there was obviously no thought as to where things were going (Fringe creator/writer/show-runner, Lost creator/writer/show-runner, Alias creator/show-runner) or that just generally suck (Armageddon writer, Gone Fishin' writer, Mission: Impossible III writer/director, Super 8 writer/director, Cloverfield producer).

    22. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry but, this is not cheetos weekly, this is slashdot. Can't enjoy 'The Ride' unless it is a good story well told, brain is hard wired that way, I know that is not the way the 'majority think' and I also know the 'majority' do not really enjoy science fiction. Thanks to smart phones, twitter and facebook, the majority are also developing the attention span of gnats, I thankfully will never be part of the majority. So Jerk Jerk A. creates movies that keeps those gnats happy, a string of action scenes to keep them interested with only the shallowest of stories, that and deep family connections keep him going, at least be honest.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    23. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by jxander · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Which is unfortunate.

      As bad as the Star Wars prequels were (and they were really really bad) at very least they were memorably bad. Darth Maul, despite being very limited in screen time, has stuck with us. We still remember the pod racing, the "oops" of young anakin blowing up the drone-base-thing... we even remember his stupid braid thing from Ep2 and how terrible Hayden Christensen's acting was. Who has forgotten Yoda's light saber duel? Mace Windu being a bad ass mutherfukin Jedi all up on Jango Fett? We haven't even forgotten Boss Nass and Jar Jar freaking Binks?

      And that's almost 15 years later... Phantom Menace came out in '99. And yet it sticks with us, in all it's terrible terrible glory. A decade from now, how clearly will we remember JJ's Trek reboot? Lens flare and... lens flare aaanndddd... Lens flare and Leonard Nimoy *shrug*

      --
      This signature is false.
    24. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      "Hey, let's make a new version of something popular but change it so it appeals to people who never liked the old version and pisses off the current fans who made it so successful in the first place! What could possibly go wrong?"

      Is anyone else disturbed by how common this trend is nowadays?

      Hope and Change!

    25. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by YodasEvilTwin · · Score: 2

      ...tables? You think it's about being strapped to a table? I certainly do recall several instances where characters were strapped to things but I hardly think that means nothing else happens. Half the episodes are one-off investigations that have a story and resolve by the end. The others built the suspense quite well IMO, you slowly realize more of what's going on and (unlike Lost, from what I hear) there is a solid and definite conclusion to the major arcs.

    26. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by LordStormes · · Score: 2

      *tosses the Companion Cube into the incinerator* WIIIILSOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOON!

    27. Re:A Portal movie?!?!? by LateArthurDent · · Score: 2

      You're really going to state that I'm wrong in a matter of entirely subjective opinion without so much as a reason? Really?

      Well, your statement was pretty subjective as well, as all manners of taste are.

      However, if you must know, I hated it because the pseudoscience was so bad the show might as well be centered around astrology. And I have a high tolerance for technobabble. Hell, I enjoy Star Trek.

      Couldn't get past the utter crap that passed for science fiction in that show to actually pay attention to any of the characters.

  2. Thanks for the spoiler by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

    I haven't played Portal 2 yet, you insensitive clod!

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Thanks for the spoiler by crazyjj · · Score: 2

      At the end, it turns out that GlaDOS was actually a ghost the entire time.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
  3. Gordon Freeman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it going to be a silent film?

  4. Closure by az26er · · Score: 2

    Now we'll finally know how Episode 3 ends.

  5. Portal? by mythosaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Dan Trachtenberg short film "Portal: No Escape" already proved (to a lot of people) that Portal would be a fun movie.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4drucg1A6Xk

  6. How about Gabe Newell and Valve Collaborate.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about Gabe Newell and Valve Collaborate on releasing Half Life 3?

  7. Because... by Darkness404 · · Score: 2

    Because movies based off of games have been awesome! You know like the Super Mario Bros movie...

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:Because... by infinite.intimation · · Score: 2

      Ok. I don't understand your comment, is it supposed to be sarcastic? Or are you being serious; because Super Mario Bros was excellent as a film related to the "super mario bros" franchise, a mix of funny, and a little dark and a little just plain bizarre.
      --
      Taxation is how individually poor people pool resources under a common banner to do, build and invent new things. Taxation helped buy the baseline for the communications network you are using to complain about taxation*, among other things. Taxation and equalization of states is how the US was founded, and is able to exist at all, preventing the absolutely likely potential for interstate conflict (that the founders rightly saw as a hallmark of the history of Europe, which led to Great wars, which the founders helped us avoid reproducing [not sure where yr' coming from, U.S is context I know about]) (*and Super Mario Bros, incorrectly)

    2. Re:Because... by maxdread · · Score: 2

      It would seem that when some people think of DOOM, they think great dialog and a deep and compelling story. Not sure wtf gave them that idea.

  8. Production shots have already been leaked... by sidragon.net · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Production shots have already been leaked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Add some more lens flare
      I'm making a note here: needs more punch!
      It's hard to overcompensate bad lighting

      Specular highlights
      We use them a lot
      Because we can

  9. Half Life Movie =/= Gordan Freeman.... by LoRdTAW · · Score: 4, Interesting

    and same goes for a portal movie. And for good reason, the lack of the character talking or making sounds makes the player feel as if they are Chell or Gordon. Games that feature character dialog make you feel more like a puppeteer. A movie cant capture that first person experience so they would have to avoid casting Gordon or Chell. My guess would be that any Valve based movie plot would be set in the HL or Portal universe and tell another heroes story.

    A HL movie could be based on the Combine invasion of Earth bridging HL1 to HL2 (though it wouldn't have a happy ending) or telling another story set in another City 17 like Combine ruled dystopian city, maybe in the USA or another location. They can still take full advantage of the HL story, Combine enemy's and aliens while tying it in with events from the game. You will probably hear references to Black Mesa, Gordon Freeman Alyx and Dr Eli Vance, Kleiner etc. Maybe their actions of stirring up trouble in city 17 inspires other rebel groups to do the same in their respective prison cities. Plenty of opportunity.

    Portal would be a bit more difficult as the game universe is limited to one lone character trapped in a high tech prison maze ran by a murderous AI. Basically a one-on-one story line. So the story would be a bit more tricky unless the plot is based on the period of time when GLaDOS went rouge and murdered the entire facility staff. Maybe a lone scientist or janitor escapes and they story is based on them. Portal 2 showed the final release of Chell, set far after the events of portal and HL2 so they could make a stereotypical "group of playing kids stumble upon danger" type plot. Maybe chronicle the rat man (I think that's the name), the person who wrote all the "cake is a lie" graffiti. Either way a Portal story would be tough.

  10. Re:Uwe Bol 2.0 by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    period.

    More of an abortion.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  11. Single Point of Failure by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

    I agree with MovieBob.
    He's already got two of the biggest sci-fi franchises of all time. JJ Abrams missed the wonder and universal good will inherent in all other Star Trek movies, and turned it into a mediocre action flick. WTF were water pipes doing in the engineering room? It was stupid, existing only for a hardly humorous plot device. Transporting at Warp Speed, DESTROYING a tenet of the Star Trek Universe, simply because the movie wrote itself into a corner?! Spock and Uhura? It's Pon Farr 24/7 now? I mean damn, I'm surprised Spock didn't have a romantic interlude with his future self as some Abramsian loop hole in the mating rituals. RED MATTER?! What the hell is that crap? No explanation, it's a pointless mcguffin -- not even an ounce of pseudo-scientific techno-babble: In a ST movie that had multiple time travelers, not a word of tachyons.

    No surprise that since Abrams demonstrated his ability to destroy planets he's got himself appointed master of the Death Stars as well. Must this be the era of samey sci-fi? Oh damn, the philistines will finally be right! "What movie are you watching?" "Who cares, it's science fiction, they're all basically the same."

    You know what? Screw it. I'm done with franchise recycling. The movie could have been great if it had been in any other universe, why borrow existing playgrounds to stomp in? Is Hollywood really that hard up for ideas? I wasn't pleased when they mined comic books for plot and mindshare. I actually will watch movies with NEW characters. There's no reason to lobotomize and reprogram the old ones. May the gods not ever let Hollywood learn of series such as Steins;Gate, especially not JJ!

  12. Re:Time Travel by hal2814 · · Score: 5, Funny

    JJ Abram's whole life is about time travel: Theorizing that one could time travel within his own lifetime, JJ Abrams stepped into the Quantum Leap accelerator and vanished... He woke to find himself trapped in the past, directing movies that were not his own, and driven by an unknown force to change history for the better. His only guide on this journey is Jerry Bruckheimer, an observer from his own time, who appears in the form of a hologram that only JJ can see and hear. And so JJ Abrams finds himself leaping from movie to movie, striving to put right what Uwe Boll once put wrong, and hoping each time that his next leap will be the leap home

  13. How about a new kind of film by Centurix · · Score: 2

    It'll be a tag-team effort, each cut frame directed by different directors in rotation:

    JJ Abrahms then Ewe Bol followed by Stephen Spielberg and then George Lucas. Over, and over again. It'll be like some kind of assisted suicide for theatre goers.

    --
    Task Mangler
  14. Re:Then what the hell makes it brilliant? by Hatta · · Score: 2

    So you're from the "McDonald's is the best restaurant in the world" camp then?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!