Slashdot Mirror


What To Do When an Advised BIOS Upgrade Is Bad?

Bomarc writes "Twice now I've been advised to 'flash the BIOS to the latest,' once by a (major) hard drive controller maker (RAID); once by an OEM (who listed the update as 'critical,' and has removed older versions of the BIOS). Both times, the update has bricked an expensive piece of equipment. Both times, the response after the failed flash was 'It's not our problem, it's out of warranty.' Given that they recommended / advised that the unit be upgraded, shouldn't they shoulder the responsibility of BIOS upgrade failure? Also, if their design had sockets rather than soldering on parts, one could R/R the faulty part (BIOS chip), rather than going to eBay and praying. Am I the only one that has experienced this type of problem? Have you been advised to upgrade a BIOS (firmware); and the upgrade bricked the part or system? If so, what did you do? Should I name the companies?"

467 comments

  1. Yes by platypusfriend · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You should name the companies.

    1. Re:Yes by Bomarc · · Score: 5, Informative
      Hard drive RAID controller: by LSI

      System: Dell PE 1950; critical update for the BMC controller.

      ... BTW: EMS firmware upgrade for the BSM V 2.50 bricked two motherboards. The motherboard for system #1 *may* have had a faulty BMC, however system #2 was working perfectly.

    2. Re:Yes by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      I've upgraded a number of LSI RAID controllers. Sometimes you can't skip intermediate levels, so if your firmware was way out of date that could be the problem. You also need to use the latest version of their tools.

    3. Re:Yes by Bomarc · · Score: 4, Informative

      LSI: I ran into problems with later hard drives being recognized. I was advised to flash the BIOS. It bricked the controller. After the advice of "buy another"; I removed all of the (in service) LSI controllers, as the risk of data loss (and the need for later hard drive compatibility) forced me to remove them.

    4. Re:Yes by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes - buy another is definitely going to make you buy one of their products again.

      Just tell them that you will look at competitors. And there are a few around to select between.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    5. Re:Yes by eksith · · Score: 2

      "Dell". Well, there's your problem. Hindsight is 20/20, but if there's any chance at all you can move away from Dell, I would strongly consider that. You always have to balance short term expense with long term maintenance costs.

      I can't speak for the RAID controller since I don't have experience there, but this response is really inexcusable.

      Some companies do this: Create a public site/page somewhere and post a detailed story of how and what happened. Usually that gets a response from the company to mitigate bad PR and sometimes they may respond with a fix regardless of being out of warranty.

      --
      If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
    6. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've flashed the BMC 2.5.0 upgrade on probably a dozen PE 1950/2950 machines with zero failures.

      Bad luck possibly?

    7. Re:Yes by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 2, Informative

      So, you've got one or more servers which have lapsed warranty. You applied BIOS updates and bricked your controllers.

      I don't mean to be a knob but I think the fault doesn't particularly lie with the vendor. Unless the update bricks most or all cards out there, it's more likely your config or procedure resulted in this. The bottom line is that you're running a non-warrantied configuration and something something something, resulting in bad. It doesn't matter what the something is, nobody's obligated to support a set of hardware that doesn't have support maintenance in place on it. I absolutely cringe for you... your situation totally sucks, but even if the update was named "OMGWTF PONIES! CLICK HERE!", you still did a maintenance function on a machine while lacking the standard support safety net.

      Realistically, even just USING the server is at-your-own-risk. Anything you do beyond "shut it off and replace it" is - sadly - your own circumstance.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    8. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      What's the failure mode on each of {the BMC, the PERC}? I have some experience handling failures of this nature.

      In particular, it's been my experience that on some Dell models of that generation, if you update the BMC firmware without updating the NIC firmware as well, the BMC will fail to be reachable on the network. Fortunately a NIC F/W update fixes this readily enough.

      I wish they told you that.

      [Too lazy to log in.]

    9. Re:Yes by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      You mention in TFS that you can handle replacing socketed chips. Using a heat gun to re-flow and remove/replace SMT chips isn't much of a stretch from that. If you could get your hands on a replacement chip, that is. I used a wagner heat gun from home depot ( http://openschemes.com/2009/10/16/heat-gun-homebrew-smt-rework-tutorial/

    10. Re:Yes by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. something happened to my post.. anyway, that example is not mine - just one I found on the internet (although I have done it before). It's easier than you'd think it would be.

    11. Re:Yes by greg1104 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I tell anyone who is considering a serious deployment of hardware RAID that they should buy two of the cards from day one, to have one in a backup server. Then you can run experiments on unrecognized drives or firmware updates on the backup. Also, if something fails on the main server, it increases the odds you'll be able to get to the data if it's still intact. Needing spares around is unfortunately part of the overhead of having this sort of hardware.

      RAID controllers are pretty low volume products compared to a lot of other computer parts. And the problem where a new drive doesn't work with an old controller is depressingly common too. You could just as easily run into this same issue with any other RAID hardware. LSI at least does keep updating things. I have a drawer full of old RAID cards that stopped being useful mainly because the manufacturer gave up on updates.

      Ever since 3ware was assimilated by LSI, there aren't many viable alternatives to them, if you must have hardware RAID. The only good reason to prefer it over software RAID nowadays, where you can move the drives anywhere and read them, is that booting is preserved in more failure cases. It's easy to let the boot area of a software RAID1 volume be mismatched.

    12. Re:Yes by cyberzephyr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This poster is correct. These companies need to be named so that other folks don't get screwed by them. Case in point i have a SAMSUNG 32 inch tv. It started turning itself on and off, so i called the company and found out they lost a class action suit and had to send a tech to your home to fix the problem. Hmm did SAMSUNG call me or even send a letter about this? NO. The SOB's need to be told on period!

      --
      I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
    13. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also try chip quik, it's a little less likely to damage stuff. :) And it's still cheap and within reach of someone doing the repair at home. I was happy enough using this stuff to replace SMD parts (mostly bios chips or drive controllers) on PS2s during my PS2 modchipping + repair years. :)

    14. Re:Yes by Bomarc · · Score: 3, Informative
      "Lapsed" warranty is not fair. They (Dell) won't let me renew it. Up to the (Urgent: Recommended) flash upgrade, the systems worked fine, and were being re-purposed.

      Also, do you think that they (the manufacturer) is going to say (or admit) or have a warning that says: "66% of the people that applied this critical update bricked their system" ??

      As for "OMGWTF PONIES! CLICK HERE"; there is a radical difference between "critical by manufacturer" and "ponies"

    15. Re:Yes by Firethorn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't mean to be a knob but I think the fault doesn't particularly lie with the vendor.

      I view it differently. The vender advised the work. If I called up Toyota and asked advice about something for my 10 year old truck*, while it might be out of warranty if their advice resulted in major damage I think they should be liable for something.

      Your advice seems to be along the lines of 'buy hundreds of thousands of dollars of equipment every year to replace equipment that is still functional solely to keep the warranty up'.

      That's not good for the company's wallet, the environment, etc...

      *Not that old yet, but still

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    16. Re:Yes by mvdwege · · Score: 2

      Nonsense. Dell's Pro Support is reasonably good, especially once you get past the first line.

      The major problem I have had with Dell is their insistence on doing fast model upgrades and giving lower-quality support on superseded hardware SKUs; not to mention their lousy habit of upgrading the hardware but continuing to use the same model number in their catalogue.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    17. Re:Yes by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      sure, they're not obliged to support it. however it seems they did go out of their way to support it by shipping a fix to a known problem. which is actually a manufacturing defect since the problem the fix was for was in the machine when it shipped(not that any sw/hw company ever was put to this quite basic consumer protection standard, which is not considered unrealistic standard for every other piece of electronics sold apart from anything IT related).

      knowing dell that might have been the actual fix - to brick the machine so the manufacturing defect can't cause loss of data ;).

      but you have a really funny idea of what warranty means if you think responsibility from the company stops right at the date it ends - especially in regards of maintenance recommendations(well why would anyone ship patches then you ask ?? well, to keep people buying from the company and more importantly because they have to at least try to look like they're making an effort at not knowingly selling shit they know doesn't work like it says on the brochure).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    18. Re:Yes by lightknight · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wait, wait, wait. A BIOS flash should (almost) completely erase the BIOS, then reprogram it.

      Are you telling me that some companies use incremental BIOS upgrades? And why?

      This is particularly worrying to me, as I have a SuperMicro L8i SAS controller I just installed in my main machine, and LSI is apparently behind the chipset.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    19. Re:Yes by Rod.Dorman · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to be a knob but I think the fault doesn't particularly lie with the vendor.

      I view it differently. The vender advised the work. If I called up Toyota and asked advice about something for my 10 year old truck*, while it might be out of warranty if their advice resulted in major damage I think they should be liable for something.

      I'd go along with this if the work was performed by a Toyota authorized shop. If it was done by yourself or by the corner gas station mechanic Toyota has no control over the work being done correctly.

    20. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is actually. LSI has a dualopoly with PMC Sierra, and PMC owns the adaptec brand. So if you buy an adaptec RAID controller then you are buying a PMC chipset.

    21. Re:Yes by bdsesq · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyone see what is wrong with this?

      ...... Dell's Pro Support is reasonably good,..........

      The major problem I have had with Dell is ........ giving lower-quality support ......

    22. Re:Yes by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      My question is: Why the BIOS/firmware upgrade if they were working fine?

      I have had dozens of machines over my career and never had a need to upgrade a BIOS or other firmware. There have been times when I thought about it, but read up on it and the warnings were clear as, "If you sneeze while this is updating, WARNING WILL ROBINSON! DANGER! DANGER! and then monkeys will crawl out of your ass!"

      Even as a veteran system builder I don't even recommend updates of anything(even drivers) if the system is functioning normally. Then I think about what my dad said, "If it isn't broke, don't fix it."

      In your defense, could you perhaps enlighten me on the purpose of the upgrade? It stated "critical by manufacturer" then it had to be something bad. I have had cars recalled for certain issues such as: The driver window will fail to roll down because the electrical switch won't make contact(I never brought that car in and never had a problem with the window). Another car had a problem with the cruise control never turning off, which caused the chip to over heat and catch fire(I had that car in the shop the next day). All in the severity...

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    23. Re:Yes by alen · · Score: 1

      we run all HP in our shop, but the rule is that we only buy HP branded cards for the servers. HP branded RAM, RAID, HBA's, hard drives, etc

      might cost more but all the firmware is tested to work TOGETHER. we have used Emulex HBA's before but HP also uses them and the HP ones aren't any different than vanilla Emulex ones so its not a big deal. but in some cases you want the branded part.

      sure you might save some money, but in the end you're creating too much useless monkey work for yourself. like troubleshooting firmware bricking issues. worthless knowledge

    24. Re:Yes by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone see what is wrong with this?

      Yes. What is wrong is that you deleted important context and qualifiers.

    25. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you register your purchase? They're not actually psychic you know, and they certainly don't know where you live if you don't tell them. That's 90% of the purpose of warranty registration cards.

    26. Re:Yes by Richard_J_N · · Score: 1

      What do you do when you want to use Linux software raid, but the server only comes with a hardware raid controller, and won't let you have direct disk access? This has been the case with all my recent IBM and HP servers.

    27. Re:Yes by maestroX · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ever since 3ware was assimilated by LSI, there aren't many viable alternatives to them, if you must have hardware RAID.

      areca

    28. Re:Yes by MikeBabcock · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is one of the many reasons I order Dell servers.

      One of the others being that their next-business-day 5 yr warranty really means next-business-day.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    29. Re:Yes by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Dell's ProSupport is excellent if you use the online chat rather than phone support, at least in my experience.

      The online chat feature connects me to people who almost immediately respond with "so I'll dispatch you a new [x,y,z] then?"

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    30. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can Samsung tell you? Did you mail in that little registration card everyone ignores? If not, they have no way of knowing who you are...

    31. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The BIOS upgrades also upgrade the version number on the internal config data on the card, which is why he's saying that can happen.

      I've personally never seen it happen, though the other thing to consider is, his card is from the same generation as the LSI 1068-E family, while yours is a SAS2008-era card [a generation newer].

      I've seen parts of that card you never wanted to see, and I assure you, short of manually issuing an erase command from DOS and then power cycling the machine, you're going to find it almost impossible to brick one of those.

    32. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's very, very, very unlikely you completely bricked it if it's a SAS2008. No idea on the older stuff.

      Their flashing utility doesn't like to be used in some motherboards, try something a different host.

    33. Re:Yes by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      He was talking about the raid controller firmware, not the bios firmware, though you may still have a point.

    34. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or, you know... Use RAID how it's intended: To guard against disk failure. It's never a replacement for backups.

      RAID is for availability of the system, not for keeping your data safe.

    35. Re:Yes by Fishchip · · Score: 1

      You may be on to something here. I'll bring in my hardware to Best Buy or somesuch, let the BIOS update fuck up on their watch and let them scramble trying to replace/repair it. =) Simplicity.

    36. Re:Yes by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      I've never had a problem updating BIOS on any of the half a dozen LSI controllers I have at home, and sometimes have jumped many revisions.

      As you say, using the latest tools is definitely important.

    37. Re:Yes by dshk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your comment reminded me how great that there is Supermicro, who let me completely build even the most advanced x86 server if I want so.

    38. Re:Yes by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Dell's own brand RAID controllers are re-badged LSI controllers; my guess is he's talking about one of these.

    39. Re:Yes by HiThere · · Score: 1

      HP *used* to be a good company. Unfortunately, that doesn't appear to be true any longer. I suspect that this decision was made back before the recent boards took control, and that at the time it was a good decision. I also suspect that you should re-evaluate it against current HP products, support, and practices. And that if you were to do so, you would pick a different vendor to standardize on.

      Still, that process is a real nuisance, so I can understand why inertia has kept you with HP.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    40. Re:Yes by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      What I've found, big as a PITA as it is, if you have to apply ALL BIOS updates IN ORDER. Lets say you have firmware 1.2 and the latest release is 1.8, with a 1.4 and 1.6 in between? Then you will HAVE to apply 1.4 AND 1.6 before you apply 1.8. The reason being the firmware designers ONLY test for going from 1.6 to 1.8 not for every prior release.

      I was told that many years ago and have stuck with it and NEVER had a bricked device, while some of the shops I worked at had workers that would try to skip straight to the latest and I'd say a good 1 in 3 ended up doorstops. Yes it takes a little longer but if you time is worth more than the cost of the device you should probably just replace it anyway, otherwise you are risking a bricking for what on average is an extra 30 minutes worth of work.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    41. Re:Yes by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Present each physical disk as an individual volume via the raid controller. I've done this with the IBM ServeRAID controllers in 2 x3650 M3 machines we used for proxy servers. The WebGUI firmware configuration allows 1 disk in a volume.

      For the HP servers, the same should apply, but I have no experience with them.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    42. Re:Yes by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      As usual Slashdot posters don't mention where they are, but in the UK you would still be able to get the controller fixed or partially refunded (plus possibly costs incurred due to having to switch brand) thanks to the Sale of Goods Act. Doesn't your country have any consumer protection from douchbag vendors?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    43. Re:Yes by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Moral of the story: If a company screws you NEVER buy from them again. Abit screwed me on their CPU support list which turned out if the chip wasn't released prior to the board? They didn't test squat, just looked at the voltage which of course doesn't magically tell you if the CPU will work so I never bought from them again, same thing with Biostar when I had to buy a new board because their CPU support list said the X6 was supported and it turned out that like Abit they were ONLY looking at the watts on the box and ignoring that later Phenoms have turbocore which requires a boost to wattage when it activates.

      At the end of the day all you can do is not buy from them again and warn others, just as I was warning others before it came out Nvidia had made a batch with faulty solder or how I warn people now that Seagate drives over 500GB seem to be having crazy high failure rates.

      I DO have a question though, what was the firmware number you were on and which did you try to upgrade to, if you remember? As I stated in an earlier posting a lot of those devices can NOT have in between firmware skipped without serious risk of bricking so I am curious whether you applied the previous updates and it still bricked, or if you tried to go straight to the latest and that is when it crapped out.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    44. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, some companies really are that terrible.

      Oddly enough, not even Sony are that bad with PS3 firmware updates.

    45. Re:Yes by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      A: You don't update BIOS unless you find that you actually NEED IT.
                1. Similarly, you don't update software unless you find that you actually NEED IT.

      B: You make a backup of your existing BIOS, "just in case".

      C: Be prepared to revert to your backed up BIOS.
              1. Said preparation may involve purchase of a suitable eeprom writing device, some of which will flash a lot of different chips.

      D: Consider the age of your hardware before deciding to flash. If it has served you well for two, or ten, or even twenty years, WTF do you want to flash it NOW?

      E: See A above.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    46. Re:Yes by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Is there really any need for hardware RAID these days? You can get more ports from a simple SATA/SCSI controller card and even the computational overhead of RAID5 is tiny for modern CPUs. Software RAID is safer and cheaper.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    47. Re:Yes by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Since apparently the US has very weak consumer protection laws it might be best to only do firmware updates during the warranty period. After that consider the feature set fixed and if it doesn't support a new model of drive then you need a new card. That dramatically changes the expected usable lifetime of the card, but also appears to be what the vendors are saying is the case.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    48. Re:Yes by Keruo · · Score: 2

      Why on earth are you repurposing ~7-10 year old server hardware?
      You really cannot trust such devices in production environment and repurposing for testing would fail because you might run into issues installing current software on that hardware as it's not officially supported.
      Don't test with obsolete hardware.
      If your plan was to run linux on them, why did you bother with BMC updates, just leave it unconfigured. Yes, it'll flash ugly orange error messages, but you know those are unneccessary and you'll remote manage the machine over ssh anyways.

      Call Dell, explain them that you need new servers and you'd like to recycle your old ones.
      They'll likely even give you some discount for the old machines rather than charge you for recycling them.
      You get new hardware to work with, which is under warranty again, and it's most likely less power consuming and produces less heat so you'll save on the energy bill and cooling as well.

      This is assuming you are the first owner of the devices though. If you bought them second hand, you're SOL.

      --
      There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    49. Re:Yes by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The firmware image is not incremental, but things like settings data for the array might need to be updated incrementally by each revision of the BIOS. Rather short sighted, not building in a mechanism for extending the data in a way that doesn't break future updates, but also quite common with embedded systems.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    50. Re:Yes by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Did they even have your contact details? Normally when I buy a TV I don't call the manufacturer to let them know my phone number and address, and then update that information whenever it changes.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    51. Re:Yes by Bomarc · · Score: 1

      And when support says "you need this firmware version?"; with no other version between "a" and "b" (ALL other version have been removed by Dell)

    52. Re:Yes by Bomarc · · Score: 1

      My question is: Why the BIOS/firmware upgrade if they were working fine?

      1. It wasn't working fine

      2. It was recommended by the support tech

      3. It was recommended by Dell "Urgent"

    53. Re:Yes by sjames · · Score: 1

      I wrote dell off when they transposed a couple connections on motherboard power connection but kept the standard connector. The resuld is that if you plugged a standard power supply into the mechanically compatible socket on the motehrboard, *POOF*.

      Any outfit that gets that vindictive about replacement parts doesn't deserve my business.

      Personally, when they had the Dell commercials, when the smart ass said "Dude, you're getting a Dell", I always saw a hard cut to Tim Curry laughing maniacally at the end of Legend.

    54. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, let me rephrase my comment: Sony has had the best expertise I have seen in regards of firmware updates.

    55. Re:Yes by Bomarc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why on earth are you repurposing ~7-10 year old server hardware?.

      I don't believe that just because it's old it should be thrown away. The speed is comparable with "modern" (current) equipment, the maintiance cost is less. I'm tired of "Oh, this is the latest, you must have it." I don't fall for that marketing hype, it's a shame that so many do.

    56. Re:Yes by Teun · · Score: 3, Funny

      As for "OMGWTF PONIES! CLICK HERE"; there is a radical difference between "critical by manufacturer" and "ponies"

      The Brits that recently are outraged about the ponies in their Hamburgers might disagree...

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    57. Re:Yes by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      But not for RAID-6. Even multiport SATA controllers are fairly expensive, especially if you want to hook up an external enclosure at any decent speed.

    58. Re:Yes by Bomarc · · Score: 1
      You: "Ring".... "Ring"... Hello?

      Them: Ya, this is Bing Repair shop. Are you the owner of Big Company system Super 1000?

      You: Yes

      Them: Well we just wanted to call and let you know that we are done with the system.

      You: Yes, and what are the charges?

      Them: Well, we hand to express deliver a replacement motherboard. To Flash you BIOS: $1,500.00, and sale tax"

      Them: Oh, I forgot to add the $100.00 for the BIOS upgrade

    59. Re:Yes by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

      Most hardware RAID controllers can be configured as a pure passthrough. That makes them trivial to replace, but reliant on well configured software RAID or backup. Many "budget" configurations for "small office" hardware have had horrible RAID controllers, especially the "hardware RAID" controllers that actually do much of their work with your system CPU and require system resources, just to be advertised as "RAID" servers. And I'm afraid that LSI and their closely related label MegaRAID have been consistently sources of enormous risk for upgrades and instability with their newer components.

    60. Re:Yes by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

      It's not shortsighted, I'm afraid. It's a function of a very limited, proprietary interface to the motherboard, limits on available board space for circuit traces and connectors, limits on cost for those connectors, limits on available valid signals from existing standards such as PCI and PCI-E and SATA and SCSI and SAS, and limitations on the very small amount of "flash" storage allocated for this critical information. Extensibility is a poor second or third goal behind physical reliability, and cost. Investing in a more flexible architecture may be a theoretically useful and interesting improvement, but it's very hard to spend the design work and design time for a feature that will not guarantee a new revenue stream.

    61. Re:Yes by ghinckley68 · · Score: 2

      Nope not in the US. There warm and fuzzy till you give them the money. then its to bad so sad.

      --
      Linux modi 2.6.26-2-parisc
    62. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. Next time name them from GO. "Dell firmware bricks computers - 'Buy another' says Dell" is the headline wanted here. Name and shame when companies behave badly.

      That said, you bought a Dell and you're blaming them for not using sockets? I understand you're upset, but that part is senseless raging. The cheapest stuff uses the cheapest methods to deliver the cheapest price, which you wanted.

    63. Re:Yes by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We protect the vendors from consumers, around here.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    64. Re:Yes by ghinckley68 · · Score: 1

      wow are you delusional Its unlikely any of the add ons sold to you by HP were even tested by HP. The most HP probably did was review the sticker that was placed on them. I have not seen a HP machine in years that actually had any HP parts in it. Even there servers.

      --
      Linux modi 2.6.26-2-parisc
    65. Re:Yes by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Look harder.

      There's no way Dell had the only copies of those firmwares.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    66. Re:Yes by Smallpond · · Score: 3, Informative

      The only thing you should need the BIOS flash for is to boot from a RAID. I was assuming if he bricked the controller then it is also the RAID firmware, since otherwise you can boot from a rescue disk and run lsiutil to rewrite the BIOS flash.

      The problem with skipping intermediate versions is that the on-disk format can change (more new stuff in metadata, for example). Each firmware rev only knows its own version and how to update from the previous version.

    67. Re:Yes by dcollins117 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      LSI at least does keep updating things

      I admire your optimism, sir. Sure, the updates brick his controllers, but at least they come often. It's that glass-is-half-full spirit we don't see enough of these days.

    68. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard drive RAID controller: by LSI

      System: Dell PE 1950; critical update for the BMC controller.

      ... BTW: EMS firmware upgrade for the BSM V 2.50 bricked two motherboards. The motherboard for system #1 *may* have had a faulty BMC, however system #2 was working perfectly.

      What follows is my opinion but it'll be yours too if you look into things.

      Ooh boy, you bought a Dell. Man, oh man. Next time spend a few minutes of research before you invest nontrivial amounts of money in a system.

      Years and years ago Dell was one of the best and made excellent systems. Those days came and went. Brand recognition is about the only reason they're still so huge.

    69. Re:Yes by smegfault · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to wrap my head around this as it sounds logical to me. But then I wonder:

      1. The device is working on hypothetical version 1.1
      2. The device is known to work on hypothetical version 1.4

      What would be the immediate advantage of using intermediate versions 1.2 and 1.3? If it's known to work; it should work even if you skipped versions 1.2 and 1.3. The hardware doesn't change, does it?

      Aren't you increasing the risk of getting your device bricked because you're not doing one BIOS flash, you're doing three in succession.

      I'm not an expert in this, so I may be completely wrong (and have probably dodged bricking quite a few devices over the past years).

    70. Re:Yes by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      I used to build my own servers but it really takes so much more time specing it out, checking for known issues and validation that with the purposed hardware configurations that I can't really save any money on it compared to buying a Dell or HP.

      I can't stand dell servers, they are rock steady but it seems that as soon as you put the name dell on it, it slows way down. It's the same with the few HP servers I have dealt with. But in order to get the same reliability out of a fresh build, it consumes so much time that I can't justify it financially in most cases.

      As for the parent's software raid problem, I'm not a big fan of it anyways. I will hold my comments because I truly love true hardware raid- especially with nested levels like 0+1 or 10. But then again, I'm not really performance limited in what I need raid for. It's more or less for reliability. I'm not sure of why you would want software raid over hardware unless there is something along the lines of expandability or hot swapping drives I'm not directly aware of.

    71. Re:Yes by cyberzephyr · · Score: 1

      That is why the tech came to my place. Why don't you pay attention and stop trying (lamely) to pick a fight.

      --
      I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
    72. Re:Yes by dcollins117 · · Score: 2

      Thanks for the info. Next step is to send their marketing department a link to this Slashdot article so they can see what wonderful publicity they are getting in return for being douches.

    73. Re:Yes by cyberzephyr · · Score: 1

      I filled out the warranty card and all of that. That is not the problem. They sent lame techs to fix the TV for free and all is well on that tip. I was using my situation for the situation that had to do with BIOS not a TV i apologize for any confusion.

      --
      I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
    74. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We run Dell (and lots of Apple laptops for management, der) for almost all hardware. They must not completely rewrite, as most of the BIOS flashes I've done wouldn't skip certain generations. Currently E6420 laptops are on like A17 or something, if you're trying to skip versions it's a pain in the arse. It doesn't really tell you the required ones until you try the wrong ones. For example, you need to update (top of my head... problably not entirely accurate) to A14, which will tell you it requires A12, which tells you it requires A9, then A7, then A5. It's nauseating.

    75. Re:Yes by cstdenis · · Score: 1

      A update that requires the previous version to install reliably should refuse to install unless you have that version.

      --
      1984 was not supposed to be an instruction manual.
    76. Re:Yes by Quick+Reply · · Score: 1

      Poor justification, you should have proper backups instead of relying on RAID for backup

    77. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where have you been living?

      Most companies 'buy hundreds of thousands of dollars of equipment every year to replace equipment that is still functional solely to keep the warranty up'

      Computers just like everything else in this world wears out/breaks. If you fail to proactively replace hardware that is critical for your business then your going to end up stuck on the side of the road.

      If the poster cared about the hardware and wanted to keep using it they should of purchased the extended warranty (the main reason anyone buys from Dell to begin with). If they wanted to save the money then they are stuck dealing with the outcomes. Just like car manufactures, IT manufactures aren't libel for 10 year old models because owners go and add a sunroof and don't know what they are doing.

    78. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you work in IT for anything but a joke company you deserve to get fired. Critical equipment needs a safety net, backup, warranty etc.

      Do you think redundant hardware is good for the environment... No. But if you work in a serious IT position sometimes the environment shouldn't be first priority.

    79. Re:Yes by DES · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I work for an organization that has a large number of Dell servers, all of them with 5-year support contracts: a mix of 4-hour and next-business-day. In my experience, Dell have never, ever, ever solved an issue within the specified period of time. They also frequently refuse to replace failing parts until after they've actually failed (which AFAIK is a breach of the support contract), and they once told me that six DIMMs were a “large order” that would take a week to fill (after I'd already spent a week just getting them to agree that they needed replacing). They simply don't give a shit. I've had far better experiences with HP, but they also far more expensive.

    80. Re:Yes by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      I never got those commercials. It was a stoner guy talking about how excited he was about a dell. Then they had those interns who were event too clueless to check if someone was in the room before they turned out the lights talking about how impressive dell support was.

      Do people seriously go to the local stoner for advice on computer purchases? Do people seriously look for the least smart person in the room to ask about the quality of services a company provides? I would dismiss it as an apple thing only it wasn't apple.

    81. Re:Yes by Shadyman · · Score: 1

      As far as the bricked units go, do they have JTAG ports? You could always try re-flashing the bricked units. Otherwise, you could always try a BusPirate to flash the EEPROM/FLASH chip directly. I hate to see hardware go to waste :) (Assuming you could get your hands on a copy of the firmware that *doesn't* brick the unit)

      Also, just thinking aloud, but flash memory is cheap and plentiful; why don't manufacturers, when designing a board, design it such that it uses a flash chip that's one size up (16MB vs 8MB, etc), and write the factory firmware twice, so the device can still boot even after a bad update? I guess that's just wishful thinking, but would certainly save them money (vs, say, overnighting a new unit and a technician to install it halfway across the globe) while still upholding their service contracts. I was originally inclined to think "they just wanted to save a buck", but really, if this had happened under a service contract with defined SLRs, it would be in the company's best interest to make it easily fixable.

    82. Re:Yes by Guppy · · Score: 1

      There's no way Dell had the only copies of those firmwares.

      There's always a copy floating around out there. Question is, do you trust that copy enough to load it on your box?

    83. Re:Yes by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      NO. Always test with obsolete hardware. It's an edge case.

      Just don't make it the only test.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    84. Re:Yes by eksith · · Score: 1

      This is very true. My biggest peeves were the fans which all had proprietary connectors and exorbitant prices for replacements. When I could get a regular 3 pin for less than $20 and still be quiet and efficient, why in the world would I pay more for a loud vacuum cleaner, that doesn't even vacuum properly?

      --
      If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
    85. Re:Yes by green1 · · Score: 1

      Thing is, most people don't want to loose all settings when they upgrade, so most of these upgrades leave some form of settings file intact (or it's stored somewhere other than the area you are flashing) and then does whatever magic is needed to convert the stored settings to the format expected by the new version. So the problem isn't so much in the firmware/software versions, as it is in an updater that doesn't properly translate stored settings between version, AND fails to check version numbers before updating, AND has no fallback to wipe corrupted data
      If you've only tested your conversion software to work from 1.5->1.6, you should check that it's actually running on 1.5 first before updating, if you can't/won't do that, then you should check all the values, and if things don't look like they're going to work, set them to default values.

    86. Re:Yes by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Oh, Dell? You're fucked.

      They've walked away from valid warrantees on me twice now, once when I had a tape recording of the employee on tech support instructing me to do something obviously wrong - on a high price machine still under base warranty which had also had an extended warranty purchased - and promising he'd make sure it was handled if it destroyed the machine as I said it was going to.

      Why? Because their service company "Quixstar" or whatever decided they didn't feel like it, and Dell decided that meant they were off the hook.

      I've talked various employers, many already heavy Dell customers, out of buying hundreds of servers since. I expect that walking away from that $2000 laptop has cost them something like $300,000 by now, and I'm not done.

      Hewlett Packard is just as bad.

      Sorry, man. :(

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    87. Re:Yes by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      Phone support isn't actually too bad if you're an asshole.

      The basic issue is that phone support is(or at least was when I dealt with them) apparently given a bonus for reducing costs by not sending out a tech or replacement parts. Therefor when you call them up, they tend to try and convince you not to solve the problem. If you don't particularly go into the problem knowing what the solution is and basically steam roll them till they give you what you want, they're not so bad.

      That said, e-mail or online chat is substantially easier as there's no one their to suggestive sell you the idea of not getting what you want.

    88. Re:Yes by Eskarel · · Score: 2

      Your server equipment, as you've discovered, wasn't built to last a decade. I know it's tragic and it grates against your middle aged soul, but that's how it is. You want to keep it, that's fine, but don't expect it to turn on tomorrow and when it doesn't accept it.

      You've already said the raid controller was starting to fail, it's massively past the point where anyone sane is going to warranty it for any price you'd accept paying so you were on your own. You tried to fix the raid controller and it finished up dead. You don't even know for sure if it was the BIOS update that killed it or whether whatever was eating it to begin with did. You also appear to have done a decades worth of firmware updates at once, again on already failing hardware, which is never a great idea.

    89. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem with Dell is that you never know what the hell chip is in it or what
      drivers are needed. The same machine, same year, model, production run, etc...
      may use one chip in February and another in March. The only way to know is thru
      Dell's product code. If a video chip from vendor B, in March, is 2 cents cheaper than
      vendor A's from February, they start using vendor B. On the same stuff, same production
      run. Chances are very good that if you replace ANYTHING with a "compatible" part, it
      will not work. If you're lucky you can find the right drivers. If not, the the downtime, plus
      the time you spend diagnosing and trying to repair it, plus the research time finding out
      what the hell, exactly, is in the machine, plus research time finding the right drivers....it
      adds up. And that time is not coming out of DELL's pocket.

    90. Re:Yes by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude what are you typing this on? The Internet, the place that never forgets. hell I've found drivers for Win 3.1 hardware, took awhile but damned if some place in India didn't have the Win 3.1 and Win95 drivers i need to get that old CNC up and running.

      if you can't call it up on the net call Dell and have a royal bitchfit until they get you a higher tier of support, threaten to buy a shitload of HP gear and see how quick they give you somebody with a little authority. demand and don't get off the phone until the in between revs are sitting in your inbox with a "please leave us alone now" note attached. trust me it DOES work, sometimes you just gotta be a prick. that is one thing I miss about the shop I worked at in the state capital, I had a little Indian girl working there with a fiery temper that I would hand the phone to if they tried dicking me around at tier 1. You wanna watch them change their tune just put a pissed off girl cursing in Hindi on the line to Indian tech support and you'd be amazed at how quickly I'd be talking to Joe in Oregon who actually knew WTF I was talking about and who had access to the company FTP server.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    91. Re:Yes by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Yeah you would THINK that would be the case, but it ain't. The way I had it explained to me when talking to a high tier tech support one day is that the firmware devs ONLY test going from the last release to this one, they don't test what about going from RTM to the new release and THAT is what bites you in the ass.

      Like I said by only going through each firmware to get current I have NEVER had a brick, but I've worked at plenty of places where that wasn't the policy and about 1 in 3 firmware updates ended up with bricks. Is that smart? is that best software practices? Nope but its human nature, these guys are only getting paid to make an update from F to G, not do regression testing from A-G so it don't get done. of course this is why I also try to buy boards that have BIOS backups so if they ever put out a shitty release i can recover but knock on plastic so far its not been needed..

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    92. Re:Yes by smegfault · · Score: 1

      Ah right, thanks! Would that hold true for, say a relatively simple motherboard BIOS flash?

    93. Re:Yes by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      No because remember the designers only test going from 1.3 to 1.4 and for all you know they had some significant changes to the way that data is stored in the BIOS (No devices do a full clean wipe when you update firmware, some settings are saved) so that when you go from 1.1-1.4 which was never tested you end up corrupting some data because X was supposed to be stored in Y but that was only placed there in V 1.3, before that X was stored in W which just got shit on so you are SOL and enjoy your new doorstop.

      Again in theory your point is logical, you just have to remember the business side of things. The guys writing 1.4 may not be the guys that wrote 1.1 and 1.2 and thus have no idea that before the 1.3 change that X was stored in W, they are just going by 1.3 which says X is stored in Y so THAT is what they are expecting.

      When you remember you are dealing with guys that may not have had jack shit to do with any firmware pre 1.3 and are on a tight schedule and have to get 1.4 out the door you can see why they just expect everyone to be on 1.3 as it makes their job a hell of a lot easier. is this the right way, or the smart way to do it? Nope but that is just how it goes sometimes so better safe than sorry.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    94. Re:Yes by green1 · · Score: 1

      It would hold true for any poorly programmed upgrade utility, of any form. Other possible causes of issues are upgrade utilities built in to existing firmware that have various limits on what the new firmware can look like, so for example if version 1.2 thinks the next version must be of exactly size Y, the manufacturer may make 1.3 fit that parameter, but also update the upgrade utility to allow new firmwares of size Z instead. And then when the next firmware upgrade is made to 1.4 the firmware is using that extra space. in that situation an upgrade from 1.2 directly to 1.4 would fail. (I've also seen this done with changing encryption keys, or new compression methods being implemented, in all cases an intermediate firmware is used to upgrade the upgrader before the following firmware makes use of the new features)

      Of course the real culprit in any of these cases is extremely poor programming. About the first thing taught in any programming course is to never make assumptions about the initial state of any system, or about the input being handed to you. So your upgrade utility should always check first to make sure things are going to fit it's per-conceived notions, and have a contingency plan to work around it (either refuse the update, or fix the issue before continuing)

    95. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone that uses hardware RAID is an idiot.

      You get what you deserve, dumbass.

    96. Re:Yes by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      You should name the companies.

      Intel's ingenious self-bricking 320-series SSDs would probably qualify for one of them.

    97. Re:Yes by ilicas · · Score: 1

      IANAL but it seems to me that that kind of advice should only result in liability if 1. if they have a duty to give you good advice or 2. if they knew or should have know that the advice was bad. If 1 is not the case then there is a whole lot of liability being incurred in these comment threads, for which many lawsuits could be filed If 2 is not the case then whenever a patient responds badly to a treatment administered by a doctor, even when the doctor does everything right (within the limits of current medical knowledge), he could be held liable for the negative outcome. Neither seem like particularly good options to me.

    98. Re:Yes by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      How many systems have you flashed? Thousands?

      I'm asking because, while I've probably only flashed hundreds, I haven't had the problems you're having.

      Are you flashing from Windows? I always use the DOS flasher because of problems I've seen with Windows flashers (fortunately, man flashers have two banks, and they just hosed one of the two banks, so the DOS flasher could recover).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    99. Re:Yes by ChrisMaple · · Score: 4, Funny

      You should sue the schools that claim to have educated you.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    100. Re:Yes by DeVilla · · Score: 1

      It's an error handle approach called "Fail fast". Most environments that use this error handling philosophy try to fail the moment something goes wrong or at least as soon as the error can be recognized. They usually try to optimism by narrowing or removing the time between the failure and the time the failure is recognized.

      It should have been obvious that this approach is purely reactive and that a proactive/preemptive approach to failures and reporting them is needed. This might be truly novel. A triumph in innovative error handling! Bravo!

    101. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've never had Dell refuse to replace a failing part under Silver or Gold on-site warranty. The only questions were "Where do we ship it?" and "Do you need a tech to install it?".

    102. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My experience is that Dell hardware has to be at least a full year out of warranty before they refuse to renew-- granted, replacing the server might be cheaper, or at least cost-effective, vs. the price of the renewal, but it's worth it sometimes. Running an important server when it's out-of-warranty is never an option. I refuse to support hardware that's out of warranty, and explain to my supervisor when I'm hired. It's just not worth the headache.

      Usually the question of "How valuable is your data?" or "how much downtime can you afford?" is sufficient to get the warranty taken care of, although it's also my job to tell the customer/supervisor/users when the warranty is 6 months from expiring.

    103. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think the point is that "on superseded hardware" is not much of a qualifier to "giving lower-quality support" because of " their insistence on doing fast model upgrades"

    104. Re:Yes by anyanka · · Score: 3, Informative

      Their support might be inconsistent between regions (or time). I've had the opposite experience; disks replaced based on SMART reporting a imminent failure, big SCSI disks replaced next day and so on. I've been less impressed with HP, and SGI (several weeks to deliver a disk for a relatively new system). But then again, this was a few years back, and in Norway (Dell support subcontracted to a local provider), so your mileage may vary. These days I have less advanced hardware and do repairs myself, with impeccable same-day service. ;)

    105. Re:Yes by anyanka · · Score: 1

      Aha, but can you then read the disk on another server without the same controller?

    106. Re:Yes by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      The purpose of hardware RAID to try and improve the odds an important server will keep running even when a drive fails. Good practices there have some overlap with good backup strategy. Neither alone is sufficient. The problem with the "RAID is not backup" line of thinking is that most true backups require a non-trivial restore time. That's fine for when it's needed. You shouldn't have to roll back via a long process every time you lose a single drive though. That's the problem hardware RAID is better at solving than most other forms of "proper" backups.

    107. Re:Yes by anyanka · · Score: 1

      Did some testing on hardware vs software for a file server back in the early 2000s. Linux RAID turned out to be faster than Dell's built-in PERC controller, so we went with that. Been happy with that ever since, no problem weaseling out of pretty bad multi-disk failures. CPU resources were cheap back then, and even cheaper now. Might be that an expensive RAID controller is better – I remember drooling at battery-backed cache memory – but who cares if the controller is more expensive than the rest of the system together?

    108. Re:Yes by ckedge · · Score: 1

      > solved an issue within the specified period of time

      Are those actually the "resolve the issue" times? Or the "we will acknowledge your ticket and provide a 'first response'", MAYBE have someone show up onsite to begin troubleshooting...

      If you look hard, that's probably what it means -- and the "resolve" is left to "reasonable best commercial effort" where they may or may not work on the issue 24/7 (depending).

    109. Re:Yes by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      There are three reason to use hardware RAID, and your claim that software RAID is safer isn't true in a few situations. Neither is better than the other, they have slightly different use cases and trade-offs. The overhead of the RAID computations is an irrelevant factor to this decision now.

      First thing I mentioned, relatively seamless mirroring of all the blocks on disk. With Linux software RAID as a common deployment, it's easy to end up in a situation where the boot loader isn't the same on both drives, as the most obvious way a pair of disks can get out of sync. There are others. The normal way to find this out is to lose the first drive, only to discover the second won't boot. That shouldn't ever happen on a hardware RAID pair.

      Second, you won't get a proper battery-backed write cache with anything but a hardware RAID controller. If you care about write integrity, you need one of those in order to safely cache writes. It's easy to get database corruption on a software RAID setup if you try to use the drive's write cache for that; and if you don't use it, performance will be slow doing some things. A battery-backed hardware cache will be fast all the time, and it won't lose writes and cause corruption unless the server is powered off a long time.

      The third thing is a fuzzier issue. Motherboard disk controllers can easily go insane if you lose a drive. It's not important for most of them to handle this gracefully. Hardware RAID controllers should be testing that and seamlessly switching to the other disk, since not having the system go down is part of why people buy them.

    110. Re:Yes by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      I said there aren't many. Adaptec is also an option. HP has their own RAID cards too. There are a good number of vendors/integrators where the LSI controller is the only supported choice though.

    111. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it ain't broke don't fix it, especially with old hardware. so openmanage says your fw is out of date - ask first what you'll gain by updating the firmware. also learn from this and keep fw versions around, that's def a big part of keeping these old dogs up and running. our PE 1950 still does what we need it to do, just needs a good DR plan, and yeah having a spare around def helps, sure it's overhead, but finding spare parts/servers on ebay for 150$ shouldn't break your bank...heck we should be marveling about 7-10 yr old sys doing their job still...how long as http been around?

    112. Re:Yes by smegfault · · Score: 1

      No more mod points for today, but thanks for explaining green1 and hairyfeet! I always assumed "flash" meant full wipe of chip, then new stuff on chip. Apparently not so. I'll be more careful in the future....

    113. Re:Yes by tg123 · · Score: 1

      Or, you know... Use RAID how it's intended: To guard against disk failure.
      It's never a replacement for backups.

      RAID is for availability of the system, not for keeping your data safe.

      THANK YOU Anonymous Coward .
      If anyone has mod points lets give him a 5 (Insightful)

      RAID is Not a backup its like a tire on a car that lets the air out slowly
      so when you get a puncture you can stop and change the tire without
      their being death and destruction.

    114. Re:Yes by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      RAID is best used as a complement to backup. These days many people backup up on disk systems for speed and access, so having RAID on your backup system is useful.

    115. Re:Yes by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Depends on your software RAID solution. Even Linux can use ZFS now.

    116. Re:Yes by MurukeshM · · Score: 2

      No, this is the well known 'glass is empty but some day the guy pouring won't miss the target' brand of optimism.

    117. Re:Yes by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      And you picked up on that very well indeed.

      Yes, it's not much of a qualifier, and that's because that is the major pain dealing with Dell, making sure that you know what you have and how to make sure that Dell is not going to send you an incompatible part.

      Aside from that, I've dealt with worse support teams. Such as $BIG_UNIX_VENDOR, who insisted on every call that our products were under Gold support, whereas our company had a company-wide Platinum contract. Every support call took at least half an hour wrangling about it, and that was if you had the contract number at the ready.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    118. Re:Yes by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      In Luxembourg (where those ponies were put into those boxes), horse meat ("Päerdsbüfftek") is actually a delicacy (... and usually more expensive than beef). Usually, you see scammers work the other way round: serving a beef steak as horse by just using horse steak gravy with it. So, it's really a mystery how this scam could even work from an economic perspective.

      And in any case, a Romanian horse is probably much healthier to eat than a Bristish cow. Or maybe the scammers actually had too much British beef, and that affected their thinking process...

    119. Re:Yes by Mathness · · Score: 1

      Wow, 1950. Dell really build thing to last in the good old days. ;P

      --
      Carbon based humanoid in training.
    120. Re:Yes by Inda · · Score: 1

      Those Romanian horses are only healthier than our Bristish [sic] cows if they were pumped full of not-fit-for-human drugs, which they were.

      What was in our BEEFburgers was, and probably still is, ground up horse. Ground up horse used as a cheap filler; a cheaper filler than the normal sawdust and cardboard; a filler made from spines, brains and bollocks.

      It's nothing short of criminal.

      And you type a lot of horse shit.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    121. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In today's world of inexpensive SANs and virtualization, resilient software RAID on multiple OSes, and SSDs, who in their right mind would buy a hardware RAID controller? I can't think of a single use case for a RAID controller which isn't handled in a less complicated, more fault tolerant, and technically superior fashion by doing it in some other fashion.

    122. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... except when a RAID controller failure (either functional or DRT) is almost as common as a 1 in 3 drive failure possibility...

    123. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Just type "*" and be done with it, they are all the same. We buy crap so they sell us crap. I can get a new mac cause they don't make any "pro" laptops anymore... what can I do? I had to change platform (and build a hackintosh). I wote with my money, if enough people refuse to buy crap computers they will stop making crap computers. (BTW. PRO? Where the F*CK is my ECC memory?!?!?!)

    124. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true, however a backup machine you swap disks into gets your data back considerably faster then waiting for tape to hork it out

    125. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be pretty new around here. Never is a long time, and there's a decreasing number of vendors as time goes by. If I were to do that, I'd not be able to buy the following products, for one reason or another (either overall quality or support falures, but usually a combination of the two, naturally):

      * supermicro - repeated PSU failures of a specific model, wouldn't replace or cross ship, etc. repeated psu issues with multiple different models way higher than found elsewhere.
      * IBM - boards with known problem exhibiting early warning signs of total failure, wouldn't replace until failed
      * HP - repeatedly shipped systems with bad RAM upon receipt, late service with multiple trips to get a known problem fixed lasting over a week on next day support
      * Dell - failures, failures, more failures. shipped defective parts as replacements for defective parts (eg. blown caps).
      * Cisco - undocumented and improperly documented 'features'
      * Juniper - lacking advertised features, wouldn't refund or take the devices as a return because the features were due in a later service pack but not yet released ("RSN" my ass); repeated SWITCH failures on fairly new devices, port failures, etc.

      Ya gotta work with what you've got. It's all a trade off. Sometimes you can't make those decisions.

    126. Re:Yes by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      There is also 3rd party warranty. We use them for our older hardware that we can't yet afford to replace. They buy our old hardware from us to use to support their other clients. Turns out great when you have a 10 year old sun server you need hardware support for and don't want to be raped by oracle.

    127. Re:Yes by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      Entirely correct, but nowhere did your parent post mention using RAID as a data backup. The word backup was used in the context of backup hardware, as in a cold spare.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    128. Re:Yes by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I think that depends on the level of the work. Is it at the level of a spark plug swap, or more like replacing the water pump?

      In this case the companies release the BIOS updates, and instructions to them, to the public, and include making said updates a condition of customer support. IE they seem to believe that they're easy enough for customers to do themselves.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    129. Re:Yes by FireFury03 · · Score: 2

      Why on earth are you repurposing ~7-10 year old server hardware?

      Failure rates exhibit a bath-tub curve. I have yet to be convinced that hardware that has been running with no issues at all for 7 years is more likely to exhibit sudden death than brand new hardware. And yet I keep meeting people who insist on replacing anything over 3 years old with new kit that flakes out within a few weeks.

    130. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except now your maintenance cost has skyrocketed ;)

    131. Re:Yes by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I don't believe this is true for anything in their server or business line.

    132. Re:Yes by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I believe software raid allows you to recover data with different hardware, or move your disk to a different hardware platform. Something you cannot do with hardware raid. I think that is really the only difference.

    133. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from Adaptec/Promise (sometimes), you do know that everyone uses LSI chips, right?

    134. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their BIOS updates are good though. I have a PE 1950 with two 3.0Ghz Quad-cores and 24GB ram. It's pretty fast for its age, but makes a good space heater. The BIOS updates were necessary to be able to boot with 3Ghz CPUs instead of the 1.8Ghz CPUs it came with. It was also necessary to support quad-ranked DIMMs.

    135. Re:Yes by idontgno · · Score: 1

      3. It was recommended by Dell "Urgent"

      I'm sure Dell considered it "Urgent" that you put that machine permanently out of commission and buy a replacement from Dell.

      Your system somehow dodged automatic self-decommissioning; they had to fix that. NO ONE gets off the upgrade treadmill. NO ONE.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    136. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NEVER update firmware UNLESS you have a problem(s) that a firmware update MIGHT "fix", or possibly known potential problems, e.g. data corruption. You'd also likely be advised to save whatever settings you changed(if any) as every firmware update that I've ever used resets EVERYTHING to defaults, and there's no guarantee that an auto backup/restore(if one exists) for settings will work properly between various firmware revisions. i.e. have you checked the firmware setting(if any) that you might need to change to get whatever it is working again(when I hear BIOS, personally, I think motherboard o.w. it's just generically labelled firmware to me).

      As to older versions of firmware: look around. Many varied and sundry sites archive all versions of firmware/BIOS.

    137. Re:Yes by kcbnac · · Score: 1

      ...And I have a counter-anecdote. We had someone wanting to do just what you do - one patch at a time on HP's C7000 Chassis. I believe it was the Virtual Connect firmware, going from 3.50 to 3.55 - in the patchnotes they'd revised it saying "don't use this version, its busted - go straight to the latest!' - that wasn't caught and we had unplanned downtime, and the person involved worked a 21-hour day to get it back up and running.

      We've since doubled the number of chassis involved so we can live-migrate everything off a given chassis for when it gets updates so this doesn't happen again. Along with reading ALL of the patch/release notes.

    138. Re:Yes by DES · · Score: 1

      I am in Norway as well. Dell subcontract the actual hands-on work to a InfoCare (as do HP, coincidentially), but handle all communication with the client themselves. They have a support center in Ireland staffed with techs from many different nationalities and generally try to route calls from Norway to Norwegian- or Swedish-speaking techs.

      FWIW, we do most repairs ourselves, so the issue is “how fast can you send the parts” rather than “how fast can you dispatch a technician”. HP deliver most parts (disks, DIMMs, CPUs, RAID controller batteries) within a couple of hours but sometimes have to ship less common parts from other parts of the country or from Sweden. Dell deliver parts whenever they feel like it, which usually means within a day or two, but sometimes longer.

    139. Re:Yes by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      LSI at least does keep updating things.

      Kinda sorta. Updates for the Fusion MPT SAS HBA's from them long ago became limited to a latter-day stepping of their chip. The zillions of embedded and PCI HBA's with older steppings have been left out in the cold for years.

    140. Re:Yes by rcw-home · · Score: 1

      Not in the last 7-8 years it hasn't. I tried for 3 hours on the phone to get a laptop hard drive replaced under next-business-day warranty. They wouldn't budge, because I couldn't produce the output of the diagnostic tools that were loaded *on that hard drive*. In the end, we got the replacement drive when they felt they could get around to it.

      These days, there's little point to getting a hot-swap RAID server from Dell, because to get a replacement drive from them they will ask you to take the server offline and run the diagnostic checks on it. This is a far cry from 10+ years ago when I got replacement drives via UPS SonicAir over holiday weekends.

    141. Re:Yes by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Country may well make a distinct difference. FWIW, my understanding is that Dell (like IBM) uses LSI HBA's. Response time on contracts is generally just that -- time for the vendor to respond, not time to part delivery or resolution. Sun was always bad with responsiveness and arguing instead of just sending the obvious part -- once took me 5 days to get them to admit that an HBA (LSI as well) was bad. Oracle takes it to a whole new level. Having had it with Oracle (We tired of having to write an essay for *every RFQ* for the VAR to send to Oracle to get permission to quote a system, Larry has stated that he doesn't want to be in the general-purpose market, etc) we switched to HP hardware, involuntarily at first. HP's frontline CSO is obviously offshored and clueless, but I fear that's true for everyone else these days too. Heck, it's probably all the same call center -- "Oracle support" once gave me instructions that were clearly specific to Dell hardware.

    142. Re:Yes by DES · · Score: 1

      Are those actually the "resolve the issue" times? Or the "we will acknowledge your ticket and provide a 'first response'", MAYBE have someone show up onsite to begin troubleshooting...

      HP usually resolve the issue (deliver parts and if necessary dispatch a tech) within the specified time frame. Dell rarely do. I haven't read the support contracts, so I don't know the details, but I _do_ know that the people who have negotiated those support contracts get royally pissed off when I tell them that Dell once again refused to replace a DIMM or disk on the basis of a predictive failure warning, or that our payroll database will have to run on only one server for a week while Dell scour warehouses on all five continents to scrounge up six DIMMs for the other.

    143. Re:Yes by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      The LSI "WebGUI" utility is a crock. It has nothing to do with the web, and requires a @#$@#@# video console. Configuring a degenerate RAID volume around every disk to get the HBA to present it to the host can be done, we had to do just that with some Infortrend RAID chassis that my boss bought a while back. Correlating slot number vs logical drive number vs LUN number is a hassle, as is having to tear it all down and build it back any time a disk has to be replaced. I haven't tried this approach with HP's SmartArray HBA's. So far I'm just doing on-HBA RAID anyway since RHEL has no mature software alternative (btrfs is hardly mature, and MD is a joke). This has mostly worked okay so far, and having the HBA reliably turn on an indicator light on failed disks has been *priceless*.

    144. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a USAian AC and can tell you that this has been done before, though mainly in the realm of post-secondary education.

      I understand that a few times, cases against public school districts have been dismissed under state actions of sovereign immunity, as they're governmental bodies and the states don't care to open that can of worms.

      q.v. http://education-law.lawyers.com/school-law/Graduate-Sues-College-for-Joblessness.html

    145. Re:Yes by swalve · · Score: 1

      It can be related to newer firmware using a new technology that the older firmware doesn't recognize. The existing firmware (is supposed to) do some verification on the incoming firmware image before allowing it to update. If the new firmware is sufficiently different from the old, the old one can lose its mind. They *should* fail gracefully, but don't always.

      The other issue is with firmware fails is flash corruption. Smart firmware is supposed to have some kind of failsafe that it can boot into if the update fails, but not all do. And sometimes the flash chip has gotten corrupted to the point that even if the firmware has this mechanism, it keeps hitting bad spots on the flash and failing. In my experience, it is best to reflash something two or three times to make sure the writes are successful. Since I've started doing this, I have had way fewer re-flash failures.

    146. Re:Yes by Vlado · · Score: 1

      Do you think their home products come with 4-hour replacement warranty?

    147. Re:Yes by Vlado · · Score: 1

      How do you boot of of a software RAID5?

      Also if you need to rebuild data and/or have a really quick disk subsystem there is NOTHING on the market like a good raid controller with some batter backed write cache.

    148. Re:Yes by Vlado · · Score: 1

      Then that means that there is crappy coding going on.
      If testing is only done back to version X.0, then install process should not have gone through after version check. Hell, they probably check for model and vendor anyway...

    149. Re:Yes by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      There is an old saying that begins "fool me once" that is applicable here, if you keep buying from a vendor that repeatedly screws you then frankly you DESERVE to be screwed.

      Now when I say "never" does that mean i wouldn't give the company a second chance if its reported they have worked to fix their bad rep? Of course not, companies can change hands, new management can clean up a place that behaved badly in the past, situations CAN change. But that doesn't mean you should just blindly go back without doing your homework. In the cases i cited Abit (now defunct because of bad rep) never showed any signs of changing while Biostar can be a great board....as long as you remember you can ONLY use chips that were released BEFORE the board was as their CPU lists are full of shit. With Nvidia after we learned that they had a whole rev that was garbage and they KNEW it was garbage and shipped anyway? AMD would have to do as least as big a fuck up before i gave them a second look because that level of crooked is hard to get out of a company culture, finally Seagate frankly hasn't figured out how to make large drives worth a crap yet so until they do they'll be on my avoid list.

      At the end of the day all you can do is avoid the companies that are screwing customers while watching to see if they clean up their act. But if you don't bother seeing if things are different and just blindly continue to buy then another saying that starts "a fool and their money" is applicable.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    150. Re:Yes by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Completely different sitch as there you had the designers specifically advising you NOT to incrementally update but to skip straight to the end. in a case like that if their advice bricks i figure it wouldn't be hard to sue, after all you are following explicit instructions by the maker of the hardware and by doing so the device was ruined.

      But what I've found, especially when it comes to motherboard BIOS, is you check the readme and all you find is a list of changes from the last firmware release to this one with jack squat said about previous versions or whether they can be skipped. Since they aren't talking about anything but the release before current its pretty safe to assume that is what they focused on NOT going straight from RTM to the latest and greatest.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    151. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you power on the 7+ old PE1950 for three years, the extra electricity cost alone outweighs purchasing an equivalent, more power efficient server that will be within warranty for that same period (Single CPU octo-core Intel server will be about 500 less watts running doing the same work, 0.5 kwh * 72 * 365 * 0.15 = $2200, which is the non-discounted price of a mid-level R415)

    152. Re:Yes by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Your comment reminded me how great that there is Supermicro, who let me completely build even the most advanced x86 server if I want so.

      My super micro servers kept overheating. The aircon that was good enough for countless other brands of low end to high end servers just didn't seem to work with supermicro servers.

    153. Re:Yes by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Why on earth are you repurposing ~7-10 year old server hardware?

      Because some companies don't have the cash to replace everything every few years. Old stuff can still be useful outside critical production and sometimes it's the best you are going to get.

    154. Re:Yes by dshk · · Score: 1

      You have not provided any specific information, neither about the hardware, not about which is the part that is overheating. In general, at least in the 1U form factor, I cannot see any magic solution for cooling. Supermicro adds air shrouds to direct the airflow and they are using brutal fans. The front and back sides are as open, heatsinks are as large as possible. That is all they - or any other manufacturer - can do. Heat generation depends on the processors, chipset and drives.

    155. Re:Yes by Bomarc · · Score: 1
      Problems with that:

      1. The PE 1950 has an energy saving setting, witch will reduce overall power consumption, not to mention that there are current SATA drives that use about 1/2 the power of the SAS counterparts. (I suspect that is where much of the power savings comes from)

      2. I have yet to hear of a ANY lending company that will lend/lease based on "You will save..." feature of a product.

      3. How much energey is put into making the mid-level R415?

      4. I question your math. The PE 1950 ues about 250-350 watts of power.

    156. Re:Yes by joelsplace · · Score: 1

      MikeBabcock must work for Dell. I have a lot of customers with Dell next business day "PRO" support. You are lucky if you can convince them that you need the part withing that amount of time and when you do they may or may not send it. I would say that at least 50% of the time I've setup an RMA with Dell they haven't done anything until I call them back after they miss their appointment. They then can't find any record of me calling in and I have to go through their dumb as a post troubleshooting all over again. I've gotten to where I don't bother to look at something that appears to be a hardware failure. I call them first since I'm going to be on the phone with them for 2 hours and they are going to make me go through all the steps again plus a bunch that have nothing to do with the problem. Computer won't boot up because of a hard drive failure? Dell "what operating system do you have?" What possible relevance does that have??? I guess hard drive failures can be fixed by determining what OS you are running. I'll admit that every once in a while you get someone sharp and they actually help you. At least "Pro" support gets you someone that speaks english.

    157. Re:Yes by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I used to build my own servers but it really takes so much more time specing it out

      You don't spec out your pre-built servers? Anyhow, if you had much experience building servers with COTS parts (from the likes of Supermicro, Tyan, etc) you'd know that their inherent compatibility and adherence to standards saves far more time in the long run than having to fuck around with garbage from the likes of Dell and similar ilk...

    158. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Romanians have been slaughtering lots of extra horses because they are no longer allowed to use them as transport on certain roads (A road equivalents I believe). I leave you to make up your own mind whether these old, hard-working, cart pulling horses are equivalent to your Luxembourg quality horse meat.

      British beef is renowned for it's quality, and in general we have higher farming standards than most of the rest of Europe.

    159. Re:Yes by DES · · Score: 1

      Dell subcontract the actual hands-on work to a InfoCare [...]

      s/a InfoCare/InfoCare/ obviously.

    160. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize many if not most of the PERC series RAID controllers are just re-branded LSI cards. You can use MegaRAID to manage them if you needed to in a pinch. YMMV

    161. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The time quoted is not the "Resolution" time it is the "Response" time.

      It means they acknowledge your problem and begin to work on it, not fully fix the problem.

      I have the same type of situation, and 'most' of the time (ie general user-replaceable hardware faults) i either get a shipment within a few days or a courier from Dallas with 2-4 hours or next day (depends on the contract and sometimes they ask if you want to do it or have them send someone to do the work)

      Things like software related troubleshooting are different, while they responded once to a very strange hang problem within the time period it took several days (and several hardware/mainboard/cpu replacements) to find and correct the problem (an AV vendor *cough* symantec *cough* did not properly state that the windows OS SP I was running was not compatible with the AV version I had installed and i needed a minor .01 type patch upgraded version to correct it.)

      Dell didn't seem to mind doing all that work and it was an issue no one at the time was familiar with (they really though it was some CPU bug due to the behavior) but it was covered and fixed. (and symantec did 'finally' update the product page to reflect which version supported which OS)

      Response != Resolution

    162. Re:Yes by AJodock · · Score: 1

      I have found that when calling on servers when I say the OS is Linux they forward me to a different group and it is much easier to get my replacements there. If I call in on a Windows server they start asking for a dset reports, and such. If you have done at least a little bit of testing before calling that usually helps as well.

      Overall our Dell servers are extremely dependable. New boxes sometimes hit their RAM error counts, but those usually get weeded out in the first couple of months (and its never been bad enough to cause instability). We have around 500 physical boxes, and other than HDDs and RAM sticks we can go months without running onto problems.

    163. Re:Yes by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      They were 1u servers although I don't remember exactly what model. I don't know what part was overheating, all I know was they crashed about once every week or two, just died with no messages when running big compile jobs. I rearranged the airflow so they got more cool air and afterwards they only crashed about once a month. Restarting these things became a major PITA.

      This was in a server room with decent air-con. I never had the same trouble with custom built machines or the HP DL380's that were in the same rack or with the big old sun kit in the next rack.

    164. Re:Yes by maccodemonkey · · Score: 1

      Your server equipment, as you've discovered, wasn't built to last a decade. I know it's tragic and it grates against your middle aged soul, but that's how it is. You want to keep it, that's fine, but don't expect it to turn on tomorrow and when it doesn't accept it.

      You've already said the raid controller was starting to fail, it's massively past the point where anyone sane is going to warranty it for any price you'd accept paying so you were on your own. You tried to fix the raid controller and it finished up dead. You don't even know for sure if it was the BIOS update that killed it or whether whatever was eating it to begin with did. You also appear to have done a decades worth of firmware updates at once, again on already failing hardware, which is never a great idea.

      This. Any IT person worth their salt has a schedule for cycling out hardware. Old hardware is a ticking timebomb in your rack, and if you care about your uptime/availability at all you've got a plan to cycle it out before it fails.

    165. Re:Yes by zipn00b · · Score: 1

      I've not had recent experience with Dell server support but back in the days of the PERC RAID controller nightmares my 4 hour support with them was similar to your experience. 2 or 3 days of rebuilding the array with a failed drive to convince them it was truly failed so they'd send a replacement??? Fortunately I had spare servers so I could pull a functioning drive from a non-critical box to fix a critical one (like client payroll) and then do the screwing around on the crashable box. Sad thing is the cost of the Dells was about on par with IBM or HP/Compaq and the service from either of them (even after the HP/Compaq merger) was MUCH better. With the others in 4 hours I had a drive replaced...... I still hate Dell after that.

    166. Re:Yes by zipn00b · · Score: 1

      Emphasis on PROPER battery-backed write cache to make me feel warm and fuzzy over hardware RAID.
      (Another dig at Dell back in the PERC days....)

    167. Re:Yes by dshk · · Score: 1

      I understand, too high temperature is one thing, but crashing is really bad.

      The new models, which have onboard IPMI controller, send you an email if a sensor value is unusual. At least I always get a notification email when I open the case, telling me just that: somebody opened the case. I had no problem with temperature even when I run a burn-in utility.

    168. Re:Yes by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I can't speak to your experience, but I support just over 100 Dell servers for various clients and only once has it taken more than one day to receive replacement parts *and* a tech to install said parts.

      Despite being perfectly competent myself, I insist on that free technician so that Dell can't claim I screwed up the part replacement myself. Having watched them tear apart a laptop and replace every single component except the keyboard and plastic housing, I wouldn't want to do it either.

      Also since a number of my clients are more remote bits of Canada, their next-day service is much appreciated as local techs are nearly impossible to find and I'm often six or seven hours' drive away to be on-site myself.

      On one (and only one) occasion, I had a server whose RAID controller was replaced twice, motherboard three times, RAM and CPU twice each at which point Dell sent me a brand new server of the current generation to replace it with their apologies.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    169. Re:Yes by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Thank-you for your guess but my work experience is easily found with Google and its not at Dell.

      As I was the tech responsible for fixing broken servers until we began selling Dell instead and depending on their techs instead, I'm more than willing to point out when they've been helpful and never had a problem with, as I said, servers on ProSupport and online chat.

      Phone support has been a pain before, but I quickly learned to use online chat for my support requests and no longer have a problem.

      It may help (although I obviously can't compare to your own experience, not knowing it) that I can diagnose server problems myself and simply tell them what I've done in detail and what I estimate to be the problem. Once I had to personally guarantee that I would pay for the HBA if the replacement didn't fix our problem (it did). I received a call from that tech's supervisor and received many apologies.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    170. Re:Yes by sincewhen · · Score: 1

      I assume you are in Soviet Capitalist Russia?

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
    171. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fail to see how Dell really is at fault here.

      Firmware upgrades changes the foundation of an install. Do not expect it to go smoothly.

      In case 1, it sounds like last ditch, hail mary pass, we hope it might work. It was tried and it made things worse. Analogy here. You call a mechanic because your right front wheel does not work. He makes a recommendation which causes the car to not even start anymore. Either situation, you are not going anywhere.

      In case 2, the IT guy responsible should be fired. Continuing Analogy - You then proceed to do what the mechanic told you to do on Car 1 (the now really broken one) to Car 2. Why do the known bad update (anything really, driver, firmware, service pack) to ANYTHING? Especially if that thing (server) is out of warranty and is working fine.

      Dell also did offer a warranty extension. It was the company's choice to not get it. Your company contacted them for help on a machine they did not have to help you on, they recommend something that make the situation, for you, no different. It wasnt working for you and it still isnt. Dell did due diligence.

      It wasnt broke, but you surely fixed it. Sounds like you need to pass this buck off to someone else.

    172. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad they help you. It normally doesn't matter how detailed my troubleshooting has been. They still make me do the exact same things over again with them on the phone. I've only tried chat once and can't remember how that went. The last time I called was for. RAID1 setup with a failed drive. I made the tech define RAID1 to see if I would be able to explain my problem. He defined it correctly but then insisted that the system wouldn't boot into the OS with a failed drive. (still Joelsplace but forgot to login first on my phone)

    173. Re:Yes by anyanka · · Score: 1

      Heh, support in Norway is offshored as well – to Sweden. ;)

    174. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That seems reasonable to simply never buy from them again, however, I have been hosed by Dell on occasion, HP has shafted me before, I know people who have been shafted by IBM, and on and on. Who do you buy from, when all the choices appear to the lesser of several evils?

    175. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was the version of the LSI controller that was bricked by the firmware? Did you ask to speak to a manager when it happened?

    176. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have had several LSI controllers dating back to before they dropped the Logic and I have never bricked a controller. Also I know that whether in or out of warranty if you are on the phone with support and something goes wrong due to their recommendations, then you will get your controller replaced.

      I would contact the manager with your support ticket information and see what could be done.

    177. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the type it's likely the items were bought by the company he works for. The Sale of Goods Act doesn't apply to commercial purchases.

    178. Re:Yes by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      Um, no. Maybe. If you have a ServeRaid family member, probably. Otherwise nope.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    179. Re:Yes by ibennetch · · Score: 1

      This seems like as good a place as any for me to relate my experience.

      I had a Garmin GPS that was a few years old (perhaps a year or two out of warranty) and it was time for a map update. The Garmin-documented procedure involved running their "WebUpdater" to determine which software to order (particularly important because my device didn't have enough memory to store the brand new top-of-the-line map update and they offered a couple of different versions). I should have just ordered the map update CD from Amazon and skipped reading the official documentation...but since I wanted to make sure I did it right, I followed their process...and ended up with a bricked GPS. Most of their support team was worthless, but one guy really did try to send me a fix. Unfortunately, it didn't work. So there I was, ready to hand over around $100 for a map upgrade, possibly another $200 for a second GPS for Mrs. ibennetch, and instead gave up on Garmin entirely. Oh, and to top off the joy, their phone queue was at least 90 minutes long before reaching a real person. Ugh.

  2. Ah, they've been reading Ubersoft comics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  3. If it works, why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have this issue, too. But this is with Fedora 18 software (yeah, but it's the same idea).
    It's like whack-a-mole, the update fixes one thing, but breaks several others. I'd say, unless there's
    a real reason to upgrade, especially on legacy equipment, don't.

    1. Re:If it works, why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You updated Fedora and it bricked your system? No? So it isn't the same thing at all. You're just a moron.

  4. This happened to me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was on the phone with Cisco help desk regarding a problem with my wireless router. They told me to upgrade my BIOS. As they (2 help desk people) were on the line I flashed the BIOS. The BIOS failed and bricked the router. They told me to call another Cisco number and the person there refused to replace the unit. It took me a long time to forgive Cisco on that one.

  5. Sure Name Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I found updating a motherboard's BIOS from Windows is as safe as Russian roulette. I found most motherboards have a SPI bus connector. You can make a parallel port to SPI adapter and save a bad flash.

  6. What you're really asking... by Let's+All+Be+Chinese · · Score: 5, Insightful

    is what the legal status of their "recommendations" is and whether you ought to sue them.

    The tried-and-true andwer to that is: Ask a lawyer. I'm quite sure it can and does swing either way depending on local laws and any number of details you haven't provided.

    1. Re:What you're really asking... by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      Might be helpful to record the phone call where they told you to upgrade the BIOS, also.

    2. Re:What you're really asking... by Bomarc · · Score: 1

      Not legal in this state... HOWEVER: I believe that Dell does record every conversation....

    3. Re:What you're really asking... by cob666 · · Score: 2

      There are NO states in the US where it is illegal to record a phone conversation. Most states require that at least ONE party consent to the recording, other states require all parties to consent to the recording.

      If you want to record phone conversations you simply have to state that the conversation may be recorded for quality control purposes. If the other party doesn't hang up or object then that is implied consent.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    4. Re:What you're really asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only not legal if you don't tell them right? Surely a call can be recorded if all parties are aware, yes?

      Record calls, and tell those that you are recording that you are doing so. If a "first-line" rep. is uncomfortable with that, ask for a supervisor. If they are uncomfortable, take it up with their legal/PR folks.

      "Why are you refusing to allow me to record the call? Are you worried about liability? What might you be liable for? Providing inaccurate and bad advise? Surely you wouldn't be knowingly providing bad and inaccurate advise would you? Surely your staff are trained to provide only the best and most professional advise, right? If liability is your worry then (a) you need to do some training and (b) let me talk to somebody that you know will guide me correctly."

      Ultimately, if they won't let you record the conversation, that is all you need to know about how much you can trust the advise you are getting.

      If I were managing an "overseas" pump-and-dump-call-centre, er, I mean support department, I'd likely not let you record the call either. But you know why, right?

    5. Re:What you're really asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Florida is a 2 party state, both must consent. If you record me without my consent, absent law enforcement or legitimate business usage, it is a felony. If you want to play games with the law, be prepared to face the consequences.And yes, there are cops with "nothing better to do" than enforce the law.

    6. Re:What you're really asking... by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Almost all of these call centers include a robo-notice (in a friendly voice) before a human ever picks up notifying you that your call "may" be recorded. That's why. They can then field calls from anywhere and record all of them, without ever admitting to having a record of any of them. It's sneaky, but smart.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    7. Re:What you're really asking... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      What's the legal position if the other party has already notified you that *they* are recording the call? (e.g. an automated "Calls may be recorded for training purposes" notification)

      I do remember hearing somewhere that this made it acceptable for you to do the same, but (a) I don't vouch for the accuracy of that vague memory, (b) I can't remember if it was supposed to apply to US or UK law and (c) IANAL.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    8. Re:What you're really asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So if a company notifies me that my call may be recorded, does that count as two party consent if I want to record that call?

    9. Re:What you're really asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the state. Two party states will still require you to tell the other party you are also recording.

    10. Re:What you're really asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "This call may be recorded" sure as hell sounds like consent to me.

    11. Re:What you're really asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The second you hear the "This message may be recorded for training, and quality assurance" you have the right to record as well.

    12. Re:What you're really asking... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Use GoogleTalk or similar, and pipe the conversation to a file on disk. If that doesn't bypass stupid laws regarding wiretapping, at least it will confuse the issue.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    13. Re:What you're really asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK, that message alone is supposed to be sufficient for two party consent, as anyone who doesn't consent is supposed to hang-up. That said, only a handful of states require two-party consent and I don't live in one of them. If you want to record the call, I'd advise you call from a different state. If the call crosses state lines then federal law should apply, which is one-party consent. Of course, IANAL.

    14. Re:What you're really asking... by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 1

      Dell is a Texas company and Texas is a 1 party state. Only 1 party has to know the conversation is being recorded and do not require you tell the other party. Though they always DO tell you by saying "this call may be recorded for monitoring or training purposes" I nearly ALWAYS tell the person when I call tech support the exact same thing. It's amazing how I always seem to get a more attentive CSR that way. I rarely DO record them but then I do say "may be" recorded :)

    15. Re:What you're really asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not just say what they say, regarding recording? they expect you to swallow the fact that they record it, they better reciprocate.

    16. Re:What you're really asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You always have the option of hanging up.

      [Not going to log in while on the college's network, we have a BOFH here]

    17. Re:What you're really asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically yes in a civil context, as it doesn't state they may record it. It states it may be recorded ;-)

    18. Re:What you're really asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/if-a-company-states-that-this-call-may-be-recorded-761395.html

      Jeffrey B. Lampert responded, "It is an amazing 1-way street. See what happens when you say: OK, I am going to record this also. The caller will say: Sorry, we do not consent. Florida law is clear that all parties must consent to a recording. You must give notice of your intention to record the call so that the other party consents."

      Mitchell Paul Goldstein responded, "Not exactly. They record for a specific purpose. If you really want to record, it would be best to tell them that you are recording as well."

    19. Re:What you're really asking... by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Yes. If only one-party consent was required, they wouldn't even tell you; their people already know and don't pick up until after the recorded message anyhow.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    20. Re:What you're really asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL but Yes. By saying that they have stated an intention to perform the activity. Since the act is voluntary they must consent to it if they are to do it.

  7. hello, bob! (oblig. xkcd) by sdnoob · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:hello, bob! (oblig. xkcd) by Yaa+101 · · Score: 1

      Lightning strikes where the least resistance is. :-)

  8. Name the products by cnettel · · Score: 2

    Name the products, which will of course also tell us the companies. However, it is very hard to evaluate this in general terms. A flash operation can always go wrong. If the updated code expliclitly recommended by the vendor was in fact incompatible, then I think they are at fault to some extent even for out-of-warranty hardware. But that's the only case.

    1. Re:Name the products by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > Name the products, which will of course also tell us the companies

      Exactly. Name and Shame.

      If companies won't treat their (potential) customers with respect then it is our duty to spread the word to that they don't deserve to be financially supported.

      It seems to be the only way to get the to pay any attention.

  9. Never made a brick but by kawabago · · Score: 1

    I never made a brick by flashing the BIOS but I never solved a problem that way either. It was always a malfunctioning chip on the board that the BIOS can't solve.

    1. Re:Never made a brick but by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      You must be very lucky. My last MB had SLI issues. Current one has raid issues with the firmware on one of my drives. Both fixed with a bios/few update. Some stability issues too.

  10. Consider it a (technology) life lesson by Zenin · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Don't buy hardware that can be bricked by flashing the BIOS. In this modern day and age there's just no reason for it, especially not for a price anyone would call "expensive".

    Dual BIOS setups are ideal, but the ability to backup the current BIOS in case it needs to be rolled back is a must reguardless.

    --
    My /. uid is better then your /. uid
    1. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by Sipper · · Score: 1

      Don't buy hardware that can be bricked by flashing the BIOS.

      Unfair statement; this was a situation where firmware came out later, and also almost all hardware (video cards, hard disks, network cards, motherboards, etc) has flashable firmware. Even if you have a backup of the BIOS, that cannot always save you -- like a backup of a video BIOS when the videocard can't work because it's BIOS is borked so that the screen is always black.

    2. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      A true bricking BIOS update will trash the system so badly you can't reach any backup BIOS. By definition, if the machine is still functional enough to allow reverting the BIOS update, you didn't really brick it.

    3. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by VortexCortex · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Don't buy hardware that can be bricked by flashing the BIOS.

      Unfair statement; this was a situation where firmware came out later, and also almost all hardware (video cards, hard disks, network cards, motherboards, etc) has flashable firmware.

      No you fool. It's not unfair. You're just ignorant, as in ignoring what he said. Hardware exists that can have a factory read only ROM, and a Flash-able ROM that you update. If a firmware update fails part way through or becomes corrupt the hardware can re-flash itself with the known good fallback copy of the original factory ROM firmware. The stuff like hard drives and video cards that have flashable firmware can be reflashed from another boot media. The onboard GPU can be used until you un-gork your graphics card firmware. Don't have onboard GPU as a fallback? Well, who's fault is that? Buy unbrickable hardware, it's really that simple. Sometimes it'll cost you more, sometimes A LOT more, but if you think it's worth it, then pay for it, we solved this issue. It's fair to make you pay more for the solution you want that most other folks don't actually need. Hardware that's out of warranty probably means the price is now about half of what it was when you bought it new -- Cost less to replace than the time to fix it or the difference between it and the dual firmware model -- Except MOBOs, it's a pretty standard feature there.

    4. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by Firethorn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think the most 'robust' anti-brick motherboard I've ever seen had two bios chips - and a hardware switch selecting which one was active. The active one was rendered read-only, you could only flash the inactive one.

      To update the machine you'd flash the inactive, power down the system, flip the switch, power back on and hope it worked*. If it worked, generally you just trucked on on 'B' instead of 'A', in case there was something hidden borked that you didn't find for a while. If the update was borked you simply powered down again and flipped the switch back.

      *Like with any bios update...

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    5. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by Belial6 · · Score: 2

      Exactly. There is no excuse for any product that could be called "expensive" to be accidentally brickable.

    6. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by Bomarc · · Score: 1

      How is one going to tell if the system is Bad-Bios-Brickable or not? 2nd BIOS didn't help. Windows install didn't help. (And... Support form the Dell BEFORE upgrade didn't help)

    7. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      The firmware is usually in a separate chip, just desolder that chip and reprogram it.

    8. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google AMD or award or phoenix bootblock recovery....depends on what it was.

      You're welcome.

    9. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "in case it needs to be rolled back is a must reguardless."

      in case it needs to be rolled back is a must irreguardless.

      FTFY.

    10. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are thinking of Gigabyte motherboards. Dual-BIOS has been standard for over a decade on those.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      My experience with Dell is that if this happens on a product that's still supported, they'll ship a replacement part immediately, by courier, no questions asked.

      This assumes though that:

      1. The product is still supported.
      2. You have a paid up support contract.
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    12. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by sjames · · Score: 1

      It is fair. It is quite possible to design a system to be able to recover from even a deliberately bad BIOS update.

      Sadly, I have seen plenty of boards where even though the chipset supported a recovery system, the vender couldn't be bothered to hook up the single pin necessary to make it work.

    13. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Don't buy hardware that can be bricked by flashing the BIOS

      So, "don't buy 99+% of the hardware on the market." Because let's face it, only a handful of companies are building devices with redundant firmwares/BIOSes, and most of those companies are doing horrible because that $2 is cutting into their margins and the shareholders of their companies are angry.

      Perhaps the better lesson is "don't buy hardware that *needs* the BIOS to be updated," or "buy hardware from vendors that attempt to give a damn about the state of their BIOS support."

    14. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they are offering to ship a replacement part if the product is still supported and you have paid them for it to fix a problem with faulty engineering. That should be taken as adequate for a low end crap vender. A good vendor would put in a second BIOS so that the problem didn't happen in the first place.

    15. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by unitron · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately those Gigabyte boards also slap an HPA on the first hard drive they find at boot and there's nowhere in the BIOS settings to defeat that.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    16. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, that's the minimum acceptable standard of support, I agree completely.

      I was implying that the OP is on his own. He decided to mess around on a device without ensuring the minimal support was in place, or deliberately ignoring the lack of support, so now it broke, he gets to keep both pieces.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    17. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? This did not happen on my previous (P4 2.x GHz) machine, which had a Gigabyte motherboard with dual BIOS.

    18. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had one of those, seems if the system does not believe that the main bios has failed, it will not try the backup, and I have yet to find a way to force it, other than holding a screwdriver over the n/HOLD pin pin ground, also this is hard when the silkscreen is swapped (880GMA-UDH2 r2)

      [Also too lazy to log in]

    19. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I'd never heard of HPA before... Interesting. It's been a while since I played with gigabyte boards though.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    20. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Just had an additional thought - Wouldn't that screw up an already formatted drive though? Like when I'm trying to transplant an old hard drive as a computer's new main drive?

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    21. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by wildstoo · · Score: 1

      Me neither, so I checked out the Wikipedia article and discovered this gem:

      HPA can be used by various booting and diagnostic utilities, normally in conjunction with the BIOS. An example of this implementation is the Phoenix FirstBIOS, which uses BEER (Boot Engineering Extension Record) and PARTIES (Protected Area Run Time Interface Extension Services).[3]

      Assuming that citation is valid, I have to give props to the Phoenix Technology guys for taking the time to give awesome acronyms to pretty mundane tech.

    22. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Sure I can agree with that. The summary does come off a bit like he was going to do what he was going to do and was looking for someone else to carry the risk.

    23. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by unitron · · Score: 1

      Just had an additional thought - Wouldn't that screw up an already formatted drive though? Like when I'm trying to transplant an old hard drive as a computer's new main drive?

      Why yes, it would, as suddenly you have a drive with a partition that extends into an area beyond which the drive reports as its end.

      Google "gigabyte" "hpa" "raid" to learn how it's been an unpleasant surprise for many.

      I discovered it pretty much by accident after running into strange problems trying to do TiVo drive upgrades.

      Basically you dare not power up one of their motherboards with any hard drive attached unless you have a "sacrificial" drive attached to the first drive position.

      (IDE/PATA comes before SATA if the board has both)

      You can install a drive to that position, power up, and then format it and install the OS you're planning to run, just always keep it connected at that position, even when you're doing something for which you don't need that drive or OS.

      Speaking of nasty surprises, just in case it slipped by you, google Dell ATX power supply to learn of something else for which you need to watch out.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    24. Re:Consider it a (technology) life lesson by unitron · · Score: 1

      Me neither, so I checked out the Wikipedia article and discovered this gem:

      HPA can be used by various booting and diagnostic utilities, normally in conjunction with the BIOS. An example of this implementation is the Phoenix FirstBIOS, which uses BEER (Boot Engineering Extension Record) and PARTIES (Protected Area Run Time Interface Extension Services).[3]

      Assuming that citation is valid, I have to give props to the Phoenix Technology guys for taking the time to give awesome acronyms to pretty mundane tech.

      When you have BEER and PARTIES, at least you know the Host is an obliging one.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  11. Name names by edcheevy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I generally exercise some degree of distrust towards computer manufacturer recommendations when my product is no longer under warranty and their legal team likely has them relatively well protected against your situation, but I'd definitely name names. Send a note to the Consumerist, find a few execs and contact them directly. It may be legal, but it's a dishonest approach for those companies to take. It doesn't cost you much time and energy to bring unwanted attention to the companies and that attention is sometimes enough to suddenly get your components replaced. It won't cause systematic change, but at least you're better off.

    Not one to miss an opportunity for a car analogy: if a critical recall fix bricked your ride, I think most everyone would agree it is the manufacturer's responsibility to make things right even if the vehicle is out of warranty. Of course, there's obviously more regulation involved and a more direct correlation to physical safety in the case of cars (i.e., you are putting yourself at risk of bodily harm if you choose to disregard the recall fix).

  12. Do a public service and let us know by Johnny+Loves+Linux · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's been almost 4 years since I built my last box. I'm planning on building another desktop this summer and would like to know who to avoid as I'm intending to purchase a motherboot that's supported by coreboot so I don't have to deal with UEFI. If there's a motherboard vendor doing evil stuff and they're listed I would like to avoid them if I can. Here's the link for supported motherboards: http://www.coreboot.org/Supported_Motherboards

    1. Re:Do a public service and let us know by SCPRedMage · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Corporations are not people; they do not care about you, nor should you truly care about them.

      The only thing corporations are concerned about are their bottom line; if doing something helps them profit, they'll do it. If doing something HURTS their bottom line (such as, oh, I don't know, paying taxes), they'll avoid doing it as best as they can.

      Any example you might provide to prove otherwise is only an example of image control, a calculated effort to improve their standing in the eyes of their consumers.

      Bottom line: report what corporations do. If it's bad, it'll help your fellow consumers avoid being screwed over. If it's good, it'll steer them towards companies that care enough about their image to not be total dickbags.

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    2. Re:Do a public service and let us know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Absolutely; name and shame them. Thanks for doing so below. Libel is only an issue if it's false, and it sounds like you have plenty of anecdotal evidence to defend yourself if they're foolish enough to try to contest your statements. Not to mention the Streisand effect it would cause...

    3. Re:Do a public service and let us know by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Wrong... When corporations do not put out quality products or keep their customers happy, they end up being bankrupt corporations. Their bottom line depends on caring to some extent about the customer. How much or how little is a variable that they need to balance in order to not only make a profit, but maximize that profit.

    4. Re:Do a public service and let us know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If doing something HURTS their bottom line (such as, oh, I don't know, paying taxes), they'll avoid doing it as best as they can.

      The only tax concern corporations have is whether they pay more taxes relative to their competitors. If your company makes widgets and your company pays 5% more taxes than your competitor that also makes widgets (maybe your accountant sucks), you are at a competitive disadvantage. Corporations definitely want to avoid that scenario.

      But that relative sense is the one they care about. Otherwise, corporations effectively don't pay taxes. They pass them on to the customers. If the tax rate on all companies making widgets goes up by 10%, then widgets are simply going to be 10% more expensive for everybody who buys them. All the lobbying and so forth just amounts to companies trying to get an edge against their competitors by having taxes or tax breaks that selectively apply.

      Placing an income tax on corporations is just a way of placing a double income tax on people like you and me. We paid income tax once when we got our paycheck and now we pay again the corporate income tax included in the price of everything we buy. Same deal with a sales tax, just with a sales tax it is more obvious that the corporation is merely acting as a collection agent for a tax that _you_ are paying.

      I know it's fashionable to have irrational hatred of corporations. I don't much like them myself. But when you tax a corporation you are not taxing the corporation, nor are you sticking it to those evil rich people or whatever you thought it was accomplishing. You are merely taxing yourself, again, in a slightly indirect way. I wish people who want to form opinions about these things would learn a bit about it first, it would eliminate a lot of these phony debates people keep having.

    5. Re:Do a public service and let us know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wow, and they support almost every 440BX chipset motherboard out there! I am so going to get myself another Pentium II for this.

    6. Re:Do a public service and let us know by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      Not that I think an open source BIOS-a-like like coreboot is a bad idea in principle, but have you looked at what's supported? The most modern chipset I can see is a couple of SB700's, and those are from late 2007 - quite a lot of that list is made up of golden oldies like socket 939 amd and slot 1 intel boards!

      Unless that new desktop you're planning on buying is going to be made up of parts from ebay, I think you're probably going to have to get a UEFI system. I don't even get the UEFI hate anyway. It's a hell of a step forward in features, hardware support (i.e. GPT boot disks, for a start, 64 bit) and getting rid of DOS era cruft slowing down bootup. It's not like secure boot is even an issue on standalone motherboards, and that's an entirely separate issue to UEFI anyway.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    7. Re:Do a public service and let us know by greenbird · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When corporations do not put out quality products or keep their customers happy, they end up being bankrupt corporations.

      Ummm...or end up getting bailed out with our tax dollars while the corporate upper management that drove said company to bankruptcy in the first place walks away with more money than they paid the entire bottom 80% of the employees over 10 years. Or in many cases only the second part...*cough* Nortel *cough*...

      Companies today don't look at how to make great products or keep their customers happy. Their multi-million dollar salaried CEOs simple look at how to get their bonuses triggered no matter how bad it screws up the company. That and figuring out which politicians to pay off and which lawyers to hire to kill off any potential competition.

      Hell if someone offered me millions of dollars to drive a healthy company into bankruptcy I'd be tempted to take it. Wouldn't you?

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    8. Re:Do a public service and let us know by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm intending to purchase a motherboot that's supported by coreboot so I don't have to deal with UEFI

      Why? What's wrong with UEFI that you need to replace it with coreboot (which just so happens to have a UEFI payload)

    9. Re:Do a public service and let us know by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Do you know what a corporation is? That it is a different concept than "company" or "business"? Do you understand that most charities are incorporated?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    10. Re:Do a public service and let us know by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      The ASRock E350M1 is supported, which contains an E-350 processor. Not a gaming rig, but still not a bad bit of hardware.

    11. Re:Do a public service and let us know by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      1. It's unnecessary, just launch the kernel. 2. It's a lot a new code and not well tested. 3. It has too many features, doing thing which firmware really has no business doing.

    12. Re:Do a public service and let us know by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 2

      It's unnecessary, just launch the kernel

      Which kernel? I hope you mean bootloader. UEFI actually improves the bootloading experience such that installing grub and Windows concurrently won't keep fighting for the single MBR entry - it natively supports multiple registered bootloaders. It's also necessary for using 3TB+ boot drives due to limitations in the MBR scheme.

      It's a lot a new code and not well tested.

      That's an implementation detail, not a problem with the concept itself. Hopefully it'll improve over time. I'd still generally trust it over coreboot which voids the warranty.

      It has too many features, doing thing which firmware really has no business doing.

      Linux actually makes good use of some of the features of UEFI. One prime example is using UEFI variables for storing kernel log info in non-volatile storage. Is there a particular feature of UEFI that you feel really shouldn't be there? (Please don't mention Secure Boot - even if you don't agree with the principle, it does belong at the firmware level to implement that style of security)

    13. Re:Do a public service and let us know by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      It's a lot a new code and not well tested.

      Wow, if you call UEFI new, I have to tell you, Linux 3.0 is new as well. UEFI has been around for years now. In fact, your motherboard probably runs it without you knowing - Intel has shipped UEFI only BIOSes for years with their new chips (prior to the Core Duo era). Sure, most of them run the legacy BIOS payload, but it's been around for a long time now.

      Nevermind that a certain fruity company has been using it exclusively (and publicly) in their PCs for 7 odd years now. And that Linux has had support for EFI boot for ages as well - mostly because of said company's computers (it boots Grub directly).

      And most BIOS manufacturers have been using it for ages as well.

    14. Re:Do a public service and let us know by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Nice selection of boards there, you might get something built in the last decade. Bonus points if you get something before AMD exits the x86 business or closes up shop.

      Not that UEFI is the problem, it's more that Secure Boot with no flexibility is the problem. This isn't an issue on x86.

    15. Re:Do a public service and let us know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugly and incompetent design?

    16. Re:Do a public service and let us know by psmears · · Score: 1

      Do you know what a corporation is? That it is a different concept than "company"[...]?

      In fairness, the definitions of those words (and whether they refer to the same thing) depends on jurisdiction. But you're right that many charities are incorporated.

    17. Re:Do a public service and let us know by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      No, I mean the kernel,specificly a linux or BSD kernel. Yes and update would be a pain, but I really only update my kernel every 4-5 months anyways.

      As for features, the netwoking stack comes to mind. It's basicly it's own little OS running under your operating system.

      As for the log dump, isn't that what is bricking some of those Samsung laptops? And this is far from the only bug that shows up (some will check the string name of the payload before running it and refuse to boot anything that isn't windows or redhat) . Runtime services aren't supposed to call boot services after boot, but this doesn't always happen and this can make it hard to work with. There is a huge amount of code and specification, much of it not well understood by by more than two or three people, but not a lot of tests or formal verification to make. At least if you run UEFI/tianocore on top of coreboot, you're running and open source version that can be updated at any time without worrying about weather your hardware init will keep working.

      I have one computer, my laptop which is UEFI, (2.2 i think) the rest are some sort of traditional BIOS.(award, phoenix, whatever). Oh, and I love the kernel EFI kernel stub, the fact that you can flip straight into the kernel within two seconds of turning on the power is awesome. Having it be finished loading in two second would be even awesomer.

    18. Re:Do a public service and let us know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, you say corporations are not people, but then you proceed to talk about them like they are people....

    19. Re:Do a public service and let us know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Although this won't, unfortunately, help the original poster, the best and first advice I got about computers twenty years ago was "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

      I never apply BIOS (or firmware for my DSLR) upgrades unless I am having a problem the old software can't deal with and the new version has been documented to fix.

      FWIW.

    20. Re:Do a public service and let us know by TommyNelson · · Score: 1

      While I understand and even agree with your consumer-centric view, I cannot agree with the statement that corporations don't give a flying hoot about consumer's happiness. There's a whole school of thought based on the work of Michael Porter* that suggests that corporations carve out significant benefits from listening to their customers, especially those who bitch about their products. Of course there are companies who apparently have no need to be nice, like the telecoms. But that is only because for some reason, and usually only in certain segments, the laws of competition aren't working properly. But on the whole, I think, consumers have a lot of power to pressure their suppliers of choice towards excellence. This is a 'macro' thing, of course, so there will always be examples of customers being treated badly by corporations. And yes: do name them. *Google that name if you want more info. Also in connection with 'Competitive Advantage'

    21. Re:Do a public service and let us know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, no, probably not.
      It might be tempting if the payoff was for tens of millions - ie, enough to disappear, possibly change my name, and lay in a supply of conscience-soothing medications - and if I were inclined to live the rest of my life that way. But it's a bit of a stretch to say that the mission is to achieve bankruptcy.

      Obscene as they are, sustainable bonuses and payoffs require profit. All the lobbying, bribery, and marketing is clearly seen as part of the equation that will bring profitability. Now that we've opted for these bailouts, we are living with the moral hazard, and the first two are seen as a form of insurance. Product quality is simply one more factor among many. And like the rest, there is a cost-benefit ratio attached. People will only pay so much more for a given improvement in quality. Once you start to approach the far side of the Bell curve, you start to pick your battles. That's the point where, if consumers can influence the equation by demanding superior quality, and severely punishing those companies that don't deliver it, then that skews the curve in the consumer's favor.

      But as SCPRedMage pointed out, these are amoral decision processes and should be treated as such. Expecting moral behavior from a corporation in the absence of profitability is naive.

    22. Re:Do a public service and let us know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the thousands of people employed by corporations? Should we care about them? Also, how is a corporation's concern for it's bottom line different from a person's? A corporation needs income to survive. You, as a person, need the same. Are you saying that you won't do things that increase your income and avoid things that hurt it? Your attitude has the appearance of moral superiority, but stinks of hypocrisy.

    23. Re:Do a public service and let us know by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      You sound like a Republican.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    24. Re:Do a public service and let us know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when does an individual who starts a company become evil? Is it after I reach five emploees? 10? Just curious when you this occurs.

    25. Re:Do a public service and let us know by Cramer · · Score: 1

      And apple (and sun) used OpenFirmware for EONS before that -- prior to using intel crap. Linux EFI support is due to Itanium. UEFI was a waste of time reinventing a wheel (OF) that had been used for decades.

      And you most certainly do NOT need UEFI to boot from a GPT disk. GPT already mandates a "legacy MBR". I boot non-UEFI systems from GPT disks (3+TB) every day. Sure, it takes a bit of hammering to get debian or redhat to set the system up that way, but it's not impossible.

    26. Re:Do a public service and let us know by greenbird · · Score: 1

      Obscene as they are, sustainable bonuses and payoffs require profit.

      The problem is they don't need to be sustainable from the CEOs perspective. You make 20 million in 2 years what do you care that it was accomplished by triggering bonuses using methods that are utterly unsustainable and will ultimately cause the company to go bankrupt. Nortel is the perfect example (and by far not the only one). They had a series of CEOs (Roth walked away with at least 130 million for 6 years work) that all left with millions in their bank accounts while driving a thriving 100 year old company from 30 billion in revenue to a fire sale in less than 8 years. What did they care that they bankrupted the company.

      these are amoral decision processes and should be treated as such. Expecting moral behavior from a corporation in the absence of profitability is naive.

      This whole argument is a straw man. You're implying that the only way for a company to be profitable is through amoral decisions. That's just plain wrong. I'd argue the opposite is true. Amoral actions by a company are typically what is going to drive down profitability over the long term. It may make for some decent short term profits but they cost in the long run. Moral decisions tend towards long term profitability.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    27. Re:Do a public service and let us know by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

      I never called them "evil", because they're not.

      But they're not "good", either.

      Corporations are not people, and as such they have no inherent moral compass. Add to that the fact that the larger an organization gets, the less any individual employee's morality effects it, and you have the simple fact that profitability is the only sure way to affect their behavior.

      The point isn't that corporations are "evil". It's that the only way to hold them accountable is to hurt their core mission: earn money for their shareholders.

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
  13. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Shag · · Score: 1

    I can't say hundreds, but yeah, I've flashed a bunch of stuff without bricking. Most of it was Apple kit, though.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  14. Don't fix it if it aint broke by flyingfsck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it is working, then an "upgrade" cannot make it better. It can only be the same or worse.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Don't fix it if it aint broke by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 1

      If it is working, then an "upgrade" cannot make it better. It can only be the same or worse.

      Right! That's why I hold on to Netscape Navigator 1.0.

      --
      My first program:

      Hell Segmentation fault

    2. Re:Don't fix it if it aint broke by Bomarc · · Score: 1

      If it is working, then an "upgrade" cannot make it better. It can only be the same or worse.

      Right! That's why I hold on to Netscape Navigator 1.0.

      Dang right! And my rotary phone with the long extension suites me just fine!

      ... god help me with his Java updates

    3. Re:Don't fix it if it aint broke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you also keep the 486 it's usually found on?

    4. Re:Don't fix it if it aint broke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disagree. I work for a company that makes computer hardware that takes firmware updates (none of the companies mentioned in this article). Some of the updates we have released do have back-end changes to prevent future problems (for instance, one issue which was resolved could cause the card to brick itself down the road if not corrected). The product appeared to be working fine to an end-user up until the point it broke due to this issue. By your logic, the update we offered was not needed, however there was a decent chance that a user who did not install this update would end up with a brick someday.

      Posting as AC as this is related to issues that were found in my company's product

    5. Re:Don't fix it if it aint broke by maestroX · · Score: 1

      parent +1. dont mess with BIOS unless absolutely necessary

    6. Re:Don't fix it if it aint broke by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      That's not true at all. In the case of a recent firmware flash I did to an SSD, I gained performance improvements as well as new features.

      Upgrades can improve algorithms, improve error checking, or decrease noise (such as an update I did for a Seagate drive).

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    7. Re:Don't fix it if it aint broke by antdude · · Score: 1

      What if there are problems? Upgrading/Changing firmwares is dangerous. Things can go wrong and not recoverable. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    8. Re:Don't fix it if it aint broke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just installed IE6 yesterday. What software did you need Netscape for in Wine? Or, do you take backwards compatibility very seriously for web development?

    9. Re:Don't fix it if it aint broke by Nationless · · Score: 1

      Exactly this. When I get asked if my bios is the latest version I usually just lie and say yes and then they end up providing me with the information/service I originally requested instead of badgering me about my bios being the potential culprit.

    10. Re:Don't fix it if it aint broke by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Digital much? In the real world, there are often shades of grey between the black and white.

      Case in point, I have a SAN that is supposed to safely power down in a controlled manner when the UPS' supplying it have been providing power off of battery alone for a user-defineable period of time. Unfortunately, there was a bug in the firmware of the SAN controller card that prevents the SAN from communicating with the one-and-only-one brand of UPS that the SAN works with. The manufacturer has told me there is a patch in the next revision of firmware that fixes this problem. However, since the SAN holds the OS and data for several mission critical systems, I have yet to apply the firmware update, even though the device is still in warranty. Why? Because the device is working -- albeit, in a less than ideal state -- and therefore, I am less afraid of continuing as-is than I am of possibly bricking the device during an upgrade.

      For the /. arm-chair quarterbacks: Yes, I have backups, but bare-metal restores of Windows servers are still a painful, time consuming process, at least with our backup system. Yes, I could spend the money to buy a better backup system, but capital is tight recently, and upper management isn't loosening the purse-strings, so we do what we can with what we have available. IME, the risk of powering off the SAN in a power outage is less than the risk of upgrading the firmware on the SAN, so we have chosen to continue using a slightly defective product rather than risk bricking it entirely. And for the record, I have upgraded the firmware on more devices than I can count without problem, yet I recognize this *could* happen on any update. In my opinion, the risk of data loss during a power outage is less than the risk of upgrading the firmware on this device. Consequently, we haven't upgraded it yet.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    11. Re:Don't fix it if it aint broke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the mindset that my department battles against every day. The problem is that different people have a different definition of "working". When one of our systems has a critical bug, we have to fight against people who believe that downtime procedures and workarounds are the answer. They also believe that new features, no matter what they are, aren't worth the risk of downtime. We fight hard and almost always win. Result? The most efficient IT infrastructure in our industry for many miles around.
      Sooner or later, some upgrade will be necessary. In many cases, upgrading is not a one-step process, but must happen sequentially. When that necessary upgrade comes along, will you be 1 version behind, or 10 versions behind?
      P.S. How's your computer? Haven't upgraded it in 10 years because it's still working? Can't be better if you do, after all...

  15. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Sipper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's you. I've flashed firmwares of hundreds of devices - motherboards, phones, video cards, embedded systems, routers, etc, and I have never once had one of them brick.

    That's not a fair statement, because the specific devices and firmware versions have not yet been stated, so your statement is completely based on an assumption based solely on your experiences, which may nor may not have any relevance to this hardware in question. Thus what you're doing is known as "blaming the victim".

  16. Why are you flashing these devices? by jimicus · · Score: 1

    Why are you flashing these devices?

    The only "critical" firmware upgrade is one which will - or at least has a fighting chance of - fixing an issue you are actively experiencing.

    1. Re:Why are you flashing these devices? by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      Occasionally, if you are calling about an issue, the manufacturer will suggest it. Some will refuse to help you until you ensure that everything (BIOS, drivers, etc.) is up to date.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    2. Re:Why are you flashing these devices? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      They're out of warranty, I'd be surprised if the manufacturer is even entertaining any discussion.

    3. Re:Why are you flashing these devices? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Some companies will be surprisingly helpful(so long as it's kept to discussion, not actual parts shipped) about your older gear if the notes in their file on you suggest that the reason you have older gear from them is because you buy a boatload of their stuff every year and this particular item is from the boat 4-5 years ago.

      Others will be less surprisingly helpful for a per-incident fee for taking your call at all.

      (There is also an edge case, that I've only seen once or twice: If you bought the cheapo warranty; but the product is new enough that their high rolling customers still have it under the Serious Classy Gold Enterprise Warranty, and you can convince them that you've found a real problem, rather than just fucked up, you are suddenly a valuable guinea pig who might save them some trouble with people they still have obligations to, rather than just a panhandling nuisance.)

    4. Re:Why are you flashing these devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Occasionally, if you are calling about an issue, the manufacturer will suggest it. Some will refuse to help you until you ensure that everything (BIOS, drivers, etc.) is up to date.

      Not applicable here, he said it was an out of warranty system with no support contract. The refusal to help would come long before the up to date check.

  17. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's great. It's never happened to you. You're one of the lucky ones. There are plenty of us who that has happened to, though, so kindly STFU unless you have something CONSTRUCTIVE to add to the conversation.

  18. Why not just desolder the chip... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    ... and solder a socket in?

    1. Re:Why not just desolder the chip... by rs79 · · Score: 1

      A SMT chip with 30 mil leads? Good luck with that.

      It can be done but you need really, really special tools. As in a microelectronics lab.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    2. Re:Why not just desolder the chip... by Bomarc · · Score: 1

      Which part to remove? In the system, there are four parts that have "copyright" stickers on them. Once I get the part removed, where to I get a "true" image of the BIOS to replace? (Dell only gives install via GUI, no image that I can find).

    3. Re:Why not just desolder the chip... by BigDish · · Score: 2

      These really aren't hard to do. I can take one off in under a minute, and I'm not even that good at it. SMT stuff is nowhere near as scary as people make it out to be.

    4. Re:Why not just desolder the chip... by Mateorabi · · Score: 1

      if it is a tightly packed motherboard, good luck to the average user. Chances are you'll take out a couple nearby discrete 0402 components while you are at it. Hold the heat gun blowing air for a little too long.....poof they can blow right off, they are light enough. For multi-pin parts an iron can be tricky with braided solder wicks, you're likely to burn/lift off a pad or not get all the solder without practice. Its an "extreme, desperate measure" for average Joe with consumer electronics.

      --
      "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

    5. Re:Why not just desolder the chip... by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      like a harbor freight hot air gun

      really people its not that fucking hard

    6. Re:Why not just desolder the chip... by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      the average user isnt going to update a bios

    7. Re:Why not just desolder the chip... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      That's just a normal-size chip. They're not hard to do.

      If it's a through-hole part, I'd be concerned that I don't have a big enough nozzle for my welding torch.

    8. Re:Why not just desolder the chip... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Chances are you'll take out a couple nearby discrete 0402 components while you are at it. Hold the heat gun blowing air for a little too long.....poof they can blow right off, they are light enough.

      Only if you don't know what you're doing. If you're blowing parts off the board near small components, you stick a bit of kapton tape over them to protect them.

      This is basic stuff that anyone who says they know how to solder should know.

  19. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

    I have. It happens. It wasn't a true brick as I was able to pull out some incompatable hardware (with the new bios rev) and get it to boot, but I couldn't downgrade either, so I was stuck without that piece of hardware until it got fixed. If I had been your average user, however, and did not dare open the case, it would have been effectively bricked. Then again, your average user never upgrades their bios.

  20. Why did you upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Whenever I had to upgrade a BIOS or firmware, it was usually on a brand new system or only a few months later for some recent issue. When equipement is out of warranty, you need to take that into account. What was important enough that required you to upgrade the BIOS?

    As a technician working on site for various clients, I would warn the clients of potential problems every single time. If I had to update a motherboard BIOS to fix a problem, I would tell them that if the update fail, the system woouldn't boot and this could delay their operation. If the motherboard wasn't under warranty anymore, I would tell them that they would need to replace it. If the system was too old, I would suggest that they forget the risky procedure and consider buying a new server. It's all relative to the client and the problem, but you need to cover your base so that they are the one making the decision and taking responsibility for it.

    Since you listed the update as "critical", you need to balance the pros and cons of doing this type of update. While updating the OS is a requirement against vulnerabilities, updating a BIOS isn't like that(most of the time). Sometime, you just need to tell the boss, "listen, if we don't update the firmware, it's possible that we'll get that bug that will destroy our data, and if we update the firmware, it's possible that we'll get some other problem, I suggest "this" and "this" but you need to be aware of the risks."

    1. Re:Why did you upgrade? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      Since you listed the update as "critical", you need to balance the pros and cons of doing this type of update. While updating the OS is a requirement against vulnerabilities, updating a BIOS isn't like that(most of the time). Sometime, you just need to tell the boss, "listen, if we don't update the firmware, it's possible that we'll get that bug that will destroy our data, and if we update the firmware, it's possible that we'll get some other problem, I suggest "this" and "this" but you need to be aware of the risks."

      For BIOS and firmware, generally the update isn't critical no matter what a manufacturer says, especially on equipment that's been running for years. I would't update any server hardware firmware after a year in service unless I was experiencing problems, as those servers will generally not see any operations that are not already happening - IOW, their purpose is set and they are operating fine as is. No change needed. I might monitor them more closely after such a bulletin though, and perhaps plan an earlier than expected replacement.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    2. Re:Why did you upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LSI 1068e controllers will *silently corrupt data* if used with certain drives without a firmware update.
      Critical enough for you?

    3. Re:Why did you upgrade? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      It's been running for years. If I don't have a problem, I don't need to update. If I do, my data's crap already. It didn't all of a sudden "become" a problem after the update notice.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  21. Name the products, please by Sipper · · Score: 1

    I think it's best if the original author would please name the particular products.

    1. Re:Name the products, please by matty619 · · Score: 1

      Not a bad idea. I'm rather curious myself. Was it flashed with a Windows executable? Or from a boot disc? USB flash drive or cd-r?

    2. Re:Name the products, please by Bomarc · · Score: 2
      See my previous comments, they are upthere.

      For the Dell system - Windows exe (for the BMC upgrade, listed by Dell as "critical")

      For the LSI it was a boot disk

      However: the question is about the failure -- when advised to upgrade, and the upgrade fails what to do then.

    3. Re:Name the products, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know! Whine about it on Slashdot because you're entitled to have your mistakes rolled back by some other party.

      Do I win?

  22. Your stuck between a rock and a hard place.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bios updates are often important, Many company's I've worked with say your on your own if the flash goes wrong. If its a socketed BIOS chip and the flash went wrong you could ask them to send you the new bios on a rom chip, it will cost you some money but its better than binning the device.

    If the Bios chip is soldered in place that makes it much harder, I've found more inexpensive hardware uses soldered bios chips. Rather than fighting against them your best bet is probably to ask them what they suggest, you will get more help by being nice and firm, than being miserable and demanding.
    The other thing you have to look at is why did the bios update fail in the first place?
    If you hardware is out of warranty and you have preformed maintenance on them that causes the device to become non functional, your on the hook for that in most cases.
    The last thing you could do is look around and see if you can find someone that does chip level repairs, they normally have the equipment to properly pull the chip and reflash it using something like a prom burner

  23. You should flash new stuff out of the box as they by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    You should flash new stuff out of the box as they can be quite behind.

  24. Because It Froze! by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    A Crucial consumer SSD (yeah I know, not a CPU) stopped, instantaneously.

    Answer from Crucial: "Update Firmware". Updating involved the consumer understanding how to use cryptic commands in various states of the pre-boot process on a 2nd machine running Windows with wording no consumer would have ever likely understood and then used in a command line.

    Companies who sell things like this without having adequate software and instructions do not DESERVE TO BE SUPPORTED by consumers.

    1. Re:Because It Froze! by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Answer from Crucial: "Update Firmware". Updating involved the consumer understanding how to use cryptic commands in various states of the pre-boot process on a 2nd machine running Windows with wording no consumer would have ever likely understood and then used in a command line.

      Answer from Ford: "Replace fuel pump." Replacement involved the consumer understanding how to follow directions no consumer would have ever likely understood.

      Complex mechanisms require those who service and repair them to be capable of complex operations. If you don't have the skills to fix something and don't want to learn them, you hire someone who does have those skills.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  25. Intel BIOS by matty619 · · Score: 1

    I have never had a problem since switching to using only Intel boards with Intel bios. The upgrade process usually goes quite well (I've probably flashed 100 or so Intel boards over the past 3 or 4 years) and if there is ever a problem, it automatically rolls the changes back. Out of that 100 or so bios flashes, 0 have been bricked. That being said, when it comes to consumer grade boards, especially when they're out of warranty, I just assume I'm on my own and if something like that happens, its off to EBay or Craigslist.

    1. Re:Intel BIOS by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      You do know Intel is getting out of the mobo biz, right?

      I've really only found it necessary to flash a mobo BIOS once in the past 10 years or so. It made my hands sweat. Not going to do it again if I can avoid it at all.

    2. Re:Intel BIOS by matty619 · · Score: 1

      I heard that they're getting out of the socketed CPU biz. All CPUs will be soldered directly to the board....but I had not heard they were planning on ceasing production all together. If true, I will be very sad.

      I used to feel the same as you about bios updates....don't do it unless its broken, but Intel has the process so silky smooth now, its just standard practice for me to update the bios on any Intel board that I work on. Don't do much individual desktop work anymore, but it still happens occasionally.

    3. Re:Intel BIOS by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      No problem. Even my cheap ASRock MOBO has dual firmware (read: unbrickable).

  26. Consider the Following... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's not broke, then don't fix it! And if you ever do try and fix the unbroken, then don't do it with any utility that updates the BIOS from within Windows!

  27. What kind of warranty/support plan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of support plan did you have in place on the devices in question?

    You say they were "out of warranty," so I'm guessing these were not covered under any support or warranty plan, and that the manufacturers had no incentive or legal responsibility to actually fix your issue rather than giving standardized answers like "Reboot" and "Update the firmware."

    If these are business-critical devices, I would suggest getting such a support plan, or, if it's cheaper, buying a second device as a standby unit and not upgrading both at once.

    If these were personal devices, then (unless your jurisdiction has some kind of special consumer protection law...check!) I'd say you just learned a valuable lesson. Go flame the devices in online reviews, cross the manufacturers off your list, and better luck next time.

  28. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thus what you're doing is known as "blaming the victim"

    I guess the question is, "so what"? Sometimes the victim of something is to blame.

  29. I once had to move a socketed BIOS chip to a other by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    I once had to move (hot swap) a socketed BIOS chip to a other board that also had a socketed BIOS to re flash after it failed and it worked when I put it back in to the first board.

    Does the card / board have an bios recovery mode? I did that a few times on laptops that where not booting and was able to fix most of them.

  30. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's you. I've flashed firmwares of hundreds of devices - motherboards, phones, video cards, embedded systems, routers, etc, and I have never once had one of them brick.

    That's not a fair statement, because the specific devices and firmware versions have not yet been stated, so your statement is completely based on an assumption based solely on your experiences, which may nor may not have any relevance to this hardware in question. Thus what you're doing is known as "blaming the victim".

    It's only victim blaming if he's actually been victimized. With the evidence we have, it's just as likely that he's not a victim and is instead just doing it wrong; in which case it's perfectly fine to blame him.

    You'll say that we should assume his innocence until proven otherwise, and I'll counter that we should assume the innocence of the company that suggested firmware upgrade--there's a much better chance they know what they're doing better than the subby.

  31. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Bomarc · · Score: 1

    I'm glad that every one of your flash updates has worked. I've performed MANY upgrades successfully. I follow the directions, make sure the power is good, etc. Success not the question here, but - what happens when one is advised of an upgrade (not just a casual ... look it's late) and the upgrade fails?

  32. Absolutely!!! by frootcakeuk · · Score: 1

    Name and shame away!! I want to know which companies to avoid in that respect!

    --
    Remember kids: What's right isn't as important as what's profitable.
  33. They don't make chips with pins by chromaexcursion · · Score: 2

    Sockets are expensive and would add considerably to the height of the component. Everything is surface mount now.

    1. Re:They don't make chips with pins by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      Sockets are unreliable too.

    2. Re:They don't make chips with pins by Bomarc · · Score: 1

      Sockets are expensive and would add considerably to the height of the component. Everything is surface mount now.

      Give the cost of a new system (or components), adding $1.00 per socket (approximate cost for sockets of this size) for parts that are likley to fail (I know the cost of sockets is less than this); this statement doesn't hold water.

    3. Re:They don't make chips with pins by number11 · · Score: 1

      Sockets are unreliable too.

      Exactly. Back in the days when (DIP) RAM was socketed , I would often see failures that were resolved by reseating the RAM chips. I don't recall any that were BIOS related, but those were socketed too, so might have done. Come to think of it, I've seen that with memory sticks too, but not often, that kind of socket seems to be more reliable.

    4. Re:They don't make chips with pins by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Probably, but a second BIOS that restores the first in case of failure probably costs about the same as adding a socket for the first BIOS. Sockets are usually doable, but they are the wrong answer for making devices unbrickable.

  34. Warranty by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1

    If it is out of warranty, then of course you're the one at fault. Since it's out of warranty, it's on you to see what the firmware does and make the decision on whether or not to flash. Either way it's all on you to deal with the consequences.

    You nearly always have the option of purchasing extended warranties for "critical" equipment. If it is really that critical, why didn't you replace it at the end of its warranty period?

    1. Re:Warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "why didn't you replace it at the end of its warranty period?"

      Wow - a lot of you folks out there really have problems with reading comprehension.

      This computer was replaced by something newer, and was being repurposed, in a non-critical role. It still sucks that it was bricked.

  35. Car by zmooc · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have a 1996 car. Sometimes things break or I want to alter something which requires modifications. Often, I turn to the service manual. If, while following the directions in it, something goes horrible wrong, I wouldn't even consider holding the manufacturer of the car responsible. That's what you should do too: deal with it. Take your loss, don't use outdated equipment or have it serviced/modified/upgraded by professionals that have insurance that covers these kinds of risks, which happens to be the single most important thing that makes professionals professionals.

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
    1. Re:Car by Bomarc · · Score: 1
      But if the manufacturer said "This is a criticl update that you must perform" your response would be...

      ... or "your tires on this care are not legal to be used on street anymore. If you want to user your car, you must upgrade the tires." So, you upgrade the tires, and the upgrade of tires causes the car to crash. What would you do then?

    2. Re:Car by Tynin · · Score: 1

      But if the manufacturer said "This is a criticl update that you must perform" your response would be...

      ... or "your tires on this care are not legal to be used on street anymore. If you want to user your car, you must upgrade the tires." So, you upgrade the tires, and the upgrade of tires causes the car to crash. What would you do then?

      Not that I don't have some sympathy for you, but you are presenting a false dichotomy. Any time you install a new firmware you are rolling the dice. If your product is out of warranty (also meaning you've used it for long enough that it must have been working well enough, or you bought it used/cheap/out of warranty) then you are entirely on your own. The companies have no further responsibility to you. If better reliability/longevity was needed, you should have purchased spares in advance, or scheduled hardware refreshes in a timely manor to keep your critical bits on hardware that you can get support for. Think of this as a learning experience and welcome to the reality of planning for the unexpected.

    3. Re:Car by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I have a 1996 car. Sometimes things break or I want to alter something which requires modifications.

      I have a 1996 car too(I love my saturn to bits, best car I've ever owned), but there are three things that are issued that are similar to hardware updates. One is called a TSB(technical service bulletin), a SBR(Service Bulletin recall), and a Recall. The TSB is a rare but known issue which the company will not cover for a repair for. The SBR is coverage that the company will cover for repair even if the vehicle is out of warranty because: It's in their best interest, or because they've been sued over it. The last(recall) is because the government mandated a recall to fix the issue.

      Back in '04 there was a SBR issued for the my '96 staturn relating to the failure of the horn. This was covered out-of-warranty in repair by Saturn. The warranty period for the car was 5 years.

      In the threads case, there is a similarity here. This would be akin to them telling him to flash the ECM to update the engine timing to fix a rare issue listed in one of the TSB's, where the car will stall at idle, but instead of fixing that the car no longer starts and bricked the powertrain module. In this case the car maker is responsible and required to offer an alternate solution to the repair that failed.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Car by Bomarc · · Score: 1
      Actually, I think my example is spot on.

      If the firmware is so risky that "Any time you install a new firmware you are rolling the dice", maybe the manufacturer should re-think the hardware / solution they are providing. Upgrade of the firmware should NEVER... NEVER... NEVER be risky.

      Great customer support: on day "warranty expire +1", you are on your own. They have my business (NOT).

      Also, tell that to FTC. They have NO problem going after companies whose warranties have long since expired.

    5. Re:Car by Tynin · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think my example is spot on.

      If the firmware is so risky that "Any time you install a new firmware you are rolling the dice", maybe the manufacturer should re-think the hardware / solution they are providing. Upgrade of the firmware should NEVER... NEVER... NEVER be risky.

      Great customer support: on day "warranty expire +1", you are on your own. They have my business (NOT).

      Also, tell that to FTC. They have NO problem going after companies whose warranties have long since expired.

      Sure. Unfortunately, if you are in the business of supporting something that is critical, you can either argue that you are right, and how life is unfair. Or, you can plan for failure, and not have to tell everyone that was counting on your product/whatever that everything is going to be down until does the right thing. It may not be good customer service, but you must understand that the world and most of the businesses out there don't give a shit if you sink or swim. Go ahead and file a suit against them in court if you are so obligated, but your take away should more than just hoping that some government body (FTC) makes everything all better years down the road.

    6. Re:Car by Tynin · · Score: 1

      forgot that greater than and lesser than signs make comments go away.

      Or, you can plan for failure, and not have to tell everyone that was counting on your product/whatever that everything is going to be down until _ insert unfair company _ does the right thing.

    7. Re:Car by sjames · · Score: 1

      If the manufacturer wrote the service manual and the directions were the actual cause of the problem (and not your failure to follow them correctly), why not?

  36. Upgrading to the Latest Version by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    Is the first thing you really should; always try for everything. Except maybe flashing firmware if you have no way to unbrick a faulty flash (but it is still what you will probably have to do to fix anything major).
    Them telling you this is not them making a mistake, and they cannot guarantee how old out of warranty hardware will react to anything.

    Why were you inquiring about problems in the first place? Maybe in both instances your expensive hardware was already broken and was bricked not because the advise was bad or the firmware was bad, but because the hardware was already malfunctioning.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:Upgrading to the Latest Version by jchawk · · Score: 1

      Dell 1950's aren't expensive anymore. You can buy a complete drop in replacement system from eBay for 200 to 400 bucks depending on the options you need.

    2. Re:Upgrading to the Latest Version by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      In my experience you should only upgrade to the latest version if the vendor can prove, with the issue number in hand, that that particular version solves whatever problem you're having.

      In all other cases smart administration says don't upgrade unless you have a reason.

      The only problem is that first-line support for almost all vendors I ever spoke with has a script that tells the customer to upgrade; you earn your money as an administrator if you can convince them that, no, this is not an acceptable answer.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    3. Re:Upgrading to the Latest Version by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      In my experience upgrading firmware is like restarting an OS. Often just flashing to the exact same version will solve some weird issues you are having.
      If you do not know the exact cause and solution to a problem, you do not just give up, you reinstall/flash the device/software. It is the quickest solution, it solves 99% of all problems, and because of this is the best thing you can do in most situations.

      Some problems have reasons and some are just random events caused by a particle of dust or defects in the hardware. They cannot be understood and often cannot be fixed without a reinstall/flash.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    4. Re:Upgrading to the Latest Version by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      No sorry, that's cargo-cult systems administration. You don't deploy fixes unless you know what they fix.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    5. Re:Upgrading to the Latest Version by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Well of course if you have a system wide problem you would never batch flash your entire fleet of routers (for example) hoping it might fix the problem.

      But if you have one device that is acting contrary to logic (default settings and it simply does not work), a flash is simply the only solution unless you want to get an electron microscope and start reading the current firmware one bit at a time.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    6. Re:Upgrading to the Latest Version by sjames · · Score: 1

      And by extension, it wouldn't cost Dell much to make the problem they caused right.

  37. Thinkpad T500 adventure by greg1104 · · Score: 2

    I have a Lenovo Thinkpad T500 brick that I made this way three months ago. I was running into a few weird Windows problems--everything was fine on Linux--and "upgrade the BIOS" was a stock troubleshooting suggestion. After a decade of happy Thinkpad ownership I didn't think this was risky. On the first reboot the update did something to fry the TPM chip. It worked fine before, never again afterward. Boots hung for about 10 minutes as the BIOS tried to talk to it, I stopped that only by disabling it there. And then the next week the computer stopped POST altogether. The laptop had been running fine for 3 years at that point. I've seen a few similar reports at the Lenovo forums; it's not just me. The only people who resolved this were still under warranty, the rest of us haven't considered it cost effective to pay for a fix.

    I tried to jump two major point releases at once here, from 1.20 to 3.24. My guess is that QA wasn't done on this much of a jump at once. Maybe 1.X->2.X->3.X or some other two step sequence would have worked. The Thinkpads have been disappointing is several ways recently, so I can't really say this surprised me.

    1. Re:Thinkpad T500 adventure by unitron · · Score: 1

      Any chance the original problem was one or more deteriorating electrolytic capacitors?

      There were still some of the bogus "capacitor plague" caps working their way through the supply chain back when that thing was built.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:Thinkpad T500 adventure by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but it could be the result of a blown fuse. Quite a few manufacturers couple the TPM with a fuse system, that will blow if the BIOS update fails a checksum at any point, or the BIOS update fails. There is usually a microcode program contained somewhere on the board that solely checks if the TPM has been tampered with and tells the fuse to blow if it thinks something is wrong. Some even put a double-fuse system in, where if the TPM was disabled by fuse, then the motherboard itself will also be disabled after a certain amount of attempts to boot, and access the TPM successfully.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  38. Consumer Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check your countries relevant consumer law. This would be covered by the Sale of Goods Act 1979 in the UK and similar law in most of Europe for up to 5 years after purchase. I'm unfamiliar with US law, do you have something similar?

  39. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Grave · · Score: 2

    No, actually, the people who have issues with BIOS/firmware updates are in the vast minority. Updates don't remain on a support site for long if the update itself has an issue. The vast majority of "bricks" caused by firmware flashing are either the fault of the person doing it, or the hardware already had a failure somewhere that was exacerbated by the flash.

    Considering that IT departments flash hundreds/thousands of systems regularly, the handful of gripes you see on forums are just that - a handful.

  40. What makes them 'critical'? by gelfling · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have some Thinkpads around here and it seems there's a firmware update every few months. But if you read the 'what's new' it's usually something stupid like "Old version updated to support new model xxxxxx" which I don't even have. Or worse "Corrected typo in BIOS menu."

    Before I flash anything I'd like to know why and under what scenario, if any, it's necessary.

    1. Re:What makes them 'critical'? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Precisely.

      In the case of my Thinkpads, I prefer the features of the hobbyist Middleton BIOS and won't use factory flashes because they don't fix what Middleton did.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  41. Rationalize your Upgrades by jchawk · · Score: 1

    If the bios update isn't security related and you aren't experiencing the described issue or condition I would likely avoid doing the upgrade entirely.

    Why open yourself up to the risk?

  42. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FFS, is this a court room?
    A Witch Hunt for what you perceive as the inept?

    You are missing the element of every business model.
    Retaining customer loyalty and their positive recommendation based on experience.

    Until all avenues for solutions, from said company (or alternative company solutions: IE replaceable Bios chips etc...) are exhausted, only then can the blame squarely and fairly fall on the user.

    If, it was user error, it still does not resolve the issues/choices at hand, by you spinning the communique to simply blame and shame them for what you see as two side to every story.

    Captain obvious much?

    Focus on solutions, then you'll have a valid point.
    Anything less is just you acting like a jackass with nothing of value to add.

  43. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the only two times the "victim" flashed a bios he bricked a device I suspect a loose nut behind the keyboard.

  44. Common sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming this is server hardware.

    1: Vendor should have a documented recovery procedure. If they do not have one, I do not buy in the first place. If that's part of a service contract, I make sure to include that in the cost for the accountants and if they balk, offer to do without it and quote them per-incident support. When shazbot hit the fan, if they don't want to pay the per-incident support price, their heads hang, not yours. If they don't respond and walk away, it's still their fault.

    2: I make sure we really do need the update. If its a new patch, I apply it, and the vendor says that equipment is end of life thus not supported, call bullshit and tell them you'll file a claim with the states attorney general.

    3: It's 110% possible to have bad flash memory and not know it until afterwards. Considering the quality of most BIOS update utilities, I'd be very wary updating without a recovery procedure and make absolutely damnably sure you're doing it at a good time and have a backup plan if it fails.

    1. Re:Common sense. by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      If a simple recovery procedure can fix the problem, it's not a brick.

  45. How is this even a question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NAME AND SHAME.

    Contribution: MSI Z68MA-ED55. Firmware update to support Ivy Bridge processors. Bricked it solid, and this turned out to be officially An Issue with the entire model.

    It was still well within warranty, and it got fixed, but now I wonder whether I was a fool to simply pay one-way shipping for it, and at this point I'm soured on the brand.

  46. Ummmm, no by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Informative

    That is not at all the case. BIOS/firmware/driver updates/upgrades can potentially do four things for a working system:

    1) Add new features. Many products get new features as their life goes on. My desktop board, an Intel, has gotten a number of new BIOS features during its life. When you update the code that runs something, no surprise that code can add features.

    2) Improve performance. Sometimes, a faster/more efficient way of doing something is discovered. It takes an update to make that happen. I remember a big one back in the day with 3com switches. A firmware update provided a major improvement in through put and CPU usage.

    3) Fix a bug that you haven't hit yet, but could. This is why you'll see updates tagged as urgent. Just because you never hit a bug that got discovered, doesn't mean the bug isn't there. So you want to get it fixed, BEFORE you hit it. There have been firmware updates that fixed some nasty ones, like data corruption with SSDs. Some people never got hit, but that doesn't mean the update wasn't a good idea.

    4) Security issues. Same deal as with the bugs, just a different kind of bug. If a security issue is discovered, it'll take a patch to fix it and the system will be working before the patch.

    The "Don't fix it if it ain't broke," really is not a valid ideology for systems administration.

    1. Re:Ummmm, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're either not a sysadmin or haven't been one for very long. First you state "potentially". I have seen instances where the opposite of all four items you list have happened. BIOS updates can both add and/or remove features. Performance can be increased or decreased. Bugs can be fixed and/or introduced. Same goes for security issues. The reality is that depending on the situation you have to weigh the pros and cons. If you have a system running fine, i.e. no complaints from the end user and no bulletins stating imminent doom, why would you bother upsetting the cart? If the user complains of problem X and the BIOS update claims to fix problem X, then by all means update the BIOS. If the system has an unknown issue that you cannot pin down and the BIOS is several iterations behind, give it a try. Keeping things current for sake of keeping them current is only causing extra work. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" is a valid ideology for sysadmins. That's not to say never upgrade, but upgrade/update for a reason and not just for sake of upgrading. Keeping things running smoothly at a known good state is better than constantly introducing new variables. This gets amplified more so in larger organizations.

    2. Re:Ummmm, no by mvdwege · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In cases 1 and 2, if you don't need the new features or the extra performance, your system "ain't broke".

      In cases 3 and for, your system "is broke".

      So yeah, in Systems Administration the rule still is "If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    3. Re:Ummmm, no by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      I am a sys admin, and have been one for over a decade. GPP is saying that there can be, and often are, critical flaws that have not *YET* cropped up in your environment but *could*. I'd argue that that is indeed something that is "broken" and should be fixed. You are correct to state that all four things that GPP claims could happen with an outdated firmware could also happen in a firmware update -- I have been there and seen that, in both cases. However, in my experience, a "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" sys admin is a ticking time bomb. Vendors don't waste time, energy and money hiring programmers to update firmware just for the lulz. If there is a firmware update, it usually exists for a *reason* and therefore, it is probably wise to at least consider applying the update. Sooner or later, routinely putting off updates because you haven't noticed anything wrong will eventually bite you in the backside.

      You did, however, get it exactly right when you said "you have to weigh the pros and cons." That is the crux of the argument. I pointed out up above a case where I had a SAN that could use an update, but updating the firmware on that device scares the living crap out of me because of the potential risk. On the other hand, I routinely update routers and switches without giving it a second thought. It's all about the pros and cons ;)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    4. Re:Ummmm, no by elbles · · Score: 1

      There are also the cases where upgrades intended to fix a problem actually make matters far worse. We had a lot of issues rolling out FCoE, and a firmware upgrade intended to fix some of our issues actually made matters far worse.

      Of course, we were sane, and didn't blindly apply these updates to all our systems. We tested it out on one or two lab boxes first, and once we noticed the upgrade was problematic, we yelled-and-screamed at the vendor.

      Point being, some firmware upgrades are bad, and some are good. Blindly applying all or blindly applying none at all are equally stupid system administrator philosophies. If you're not testing these sort of upgrades in a lab or testing environment prior to doing your production gear, you're doing it wrong.*

      * - Yes, I know not everyone has the luxury of a test/lab environment. But you almost always have critical systems and non-critical, and it should be pretty obvious where you'd want to try upgrades first.

    5. Re:Ummmm, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and no. Ideally, the server should remain in the same physical state for the lifetime of the service (aka "duration of the warranty").

      However. Software upgrades can be a problem, and replacing failed drives with new drives can mean incompatible firmware, so you have to use judgement as to when to upgrade firmware.

      Upgrading firmware is, fundamentally, changing the hardware of the system (or at least it's behavior), and therefore should be approached as every other major change. You must have backups, you must have a downtime window, you must have a plan for "oh crap, now what?!?". If you don't have warranty, then you'd better have a functional standby system, or an alternative way to bring the service and/or data back online.

    6. Re:Ummmm, no by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      The four scenarios you listed all fall outside of the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mindset.

      Scenario 1 and 2 ) If you don't need the new features, and if you don't need the added performance (ie dedicated machine or someone who just surfs and uses office products), then there is no reason to perform a bios upgrade. Hence, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

      Scenario 3) Not an issue if your activities on the hardware / software would never hit the bug. Hence, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

      Scenario 4) On a motherboard? Not saying it couldn't / hasn't happened, but that is a bit of a stretch. However, even if we take this a bit futher to software - if we have a piece of dedicated hardware, with no outside connection, the patch really isn't necessary (and don't say that "well what if" scenario, pretty much anything you could come up with would involve bringing in software or data from the outside. Like a computer that runs a piece of machinery - if the machine is doing it's job, and is not on the network, then DON'T upgrade the machine). Hence, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

      Getting back on topic, though, should the companies be held responsible? Well, now, that depends. Let's say the motherboard is faulty to begin with. They should be held responsible for that. If the device is faulty, they release a patch, and the patch bricks the unit, then they should be held responsible.

      If they release a BIOS update, and people all over the internet are complaining that it bricks their system, they should be held responsible for that.

      If they release a BIOS update, and you install it, and it bricks your system, but only you seem to be having issues, and the update wasn't marked critical, and you got the warning message that you are installing this at your own risk, then it's your problem.

      I don't think it should be just motherboard manufactorors that are held to this, though. I have bricked two PS3s in the past 5 years because of firmware updates they have forced on us. Now granted, you don't HAVE to upgrade the PS3, but if you want to connect to Netflix or Amazon or Hulu, or connect to the Playstation network, you have to have the newest firmware installed. If it bricks the system, that should be covered by Sony, not your extended warrenty, and it shouldn't matter how old your system is.

  47. Why can't they revert the upgrade? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    Many devices with a BIOS provide a way to do this. If the OEMs don't support such a scenario, then geez, shame on them.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  48. Are you the only one stupid enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you the only one stupid enough to change a working system due to a warning about some severe edge case that won't ever happen in your server? Probably not, but you're the only one who still has a job. Be glad for that.

  49. Re:You should flash new stuff out of the box as th by jimicus · · Score: 2

    Yeah, that's fair. But these devices aren't out of the box, they're out of warranty.

  50. hell, yes, name them by swschrad · · Score: 1

    the basic issue is this... the vendors are pretending to support their slop, but don't. so let us all know who to avoid.

    and you're right, BIOS should be removeable. alternatively, there should be an external-force component so even if the BIOS goes to Mars one-way, the flash can be reloaded through some sort of tool... say, a USB dongle... that could be standardized and put on the pegboard for $20.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  51. What did you expect? by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    Would you expect them to replace something that's out of warranty? Read their warranty terms, it probably says that once the warranty ends, under all circumstances so does their obligation to you. That's why manufacturers sell extended warranties/maintenance plans.

    1. Re:What did you expect? by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Would you expect them to replace something that's out of warranty? Read their warranty terms, it probably says that once the warranty ends, under all circumstances so does their obligation to you. That's why manufacturers sell extended warranties/maintenance plans.

      You have a device which is no longer under warranty. You call the vendor because you have a problem. The vendor has a few options:
      1. Tell you to get lost, since the item is no longer under warranty.
      2. Allow you to pay for support (which may be a technician making a site visit to fix it, return to vendor for a fix, or instructions on how to fix it yourself).
      3. Offer free support (again, site visit, return or instructions).

      They are certainly under no obligation to do anything beyond (1), but it may be beneficial for them (i.e. if they do (3) you may be more inclined to buy your next hardware from them since they offered good service even when they didn't have to).

      If they do (2) or (3) and the "fix" is potentially risky then again they have a choice:
      1. Tell you about the risks and that if it breaks they won't accept liability.
      2. Accept liability for anything that breaks.

      Again, they are under no obligation to accept liability, but they should damned well tell you this before applying the fix. "Wups sorry" doesn't cut it if you haven't already informed the customer that they may potentially be screwed if they go ahead.

  52. Were you in warranty when you got the advise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you were out of warranty and you called the company you just cost them money. So the fact they provided any advise is great without charging you money. I mean would you expect to walk into best buy ask the geek squad to listen what is wrong with your system and them provide you a possible solution on how they would fix it without payment?

  53. If it's not under warranty, why listen to them? by evilviper · · Score: 1

    Both times, the update has bricked an expensive piece of equipment. Both times, the response after the failed flash was 'It's not our problem, it's out of warranty.'

    If the device isn't under warranty, why are you listening to their advice in the first place? You upgrade firmware at the manufacturers' instructions BECAUSE you need them to provide warranty support, not just for the hell of it. I'm not even sure why THEY would be willing to spend their time talking to YOU if your systems are no longer under warranty.

    Given that they recommended / advised that the unit be upgraded, shouldn't they shoulder the responsibility of BIOS upgrade failure?

    Only if you can PROVE that the new firmware was massively faulty. There are tons of variables involved in upgrading the firmware of an advanced system, and they can't anticipate all scenarios, or have the ability to know how well your equipment was maintained before you upgraded.

    It could be that YOU didn't bother to read the release notes that have critical instructions about clearing some values before performing the firmware upgrade. It could be that your hardware was about to fail, and the firmware upgrade caused the first reboot in months or years. Or maybe the flash had stuck bits, and the firmware change had to write there, and just exposed the faulty hardware as a MORE visible problem. You were upgrading because of OTHER problems, right? How do you know the problem wasn't the hardware becoming faulty?

    Also, if their design had sockets rather than soldering on parts, one could R/R the faulty part (BIOS chip), rather than going to eBay and praying.

    YOU bought the systems, as designed. You can't claim you were forced to buy a poorly designed system, or were forced to continue using it after the manufacturer would no longer extend the warranty on the device. Next time go find a system that has these components in sockets, and don't complain to us that it's more expensive, or isn't exactly what you wanted.

    Have you been advised to upgrade a BIOS (firmware); and the upgrade bricked the part or system? If so, what did you do?

    When dealing with hundreds or thousands of systems, any firmware upgrade is guaranteed to have issues on at least a few systems. So yes, I've seen lots of firmware upgrade issues, and dealt with them. But no, I've certainly never seen a firmware upgrade from equipment manufacturers that bricked ALL the devices we've appled them to.

    Bricked systems are nearly a thing of the past. Decent motherboard manufacturers include dual BIOSes, or at least a minimal BIOS that'll allow re-flashing when a BIOS is corrupted.

    Most of the time, there's some OEM command to restart the device, or load defaults, that gets your hardware back into a usable state. Sometimes the local system communications is hosed, but the network (web, IPMI) interface is still up, and allows firmware upgrades or other controls from the network. On occasion, a very, very small percentage of (old) equipment won't survive an update, even after trying everthing you've got. Then, you just have to write it off as any other hardware failure, because that's what it is.

    For the most part, important systems are under warranty, and the OEM will replace faulty parts next day. If their firmware updates were breaking devices left and right, they'd be out one hell of a lot of money.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:If it's not under warranty, why listen to them? by Bomarc · · Score: 1
      Most of the comments are not helpful, and are borderline in fantasy. (I especially laughed at the line "YOU bought the systems, as designed." Ya, right like they are going to tell us how it is designed?!?)

      ... however:

      If their firmware updates were breaking devices left and right, they'd be out one hell of a lot of money.

      And if the actions brick 2/3 of the systems, and support says "You are on your own", how are "we" going to find out that "their" upgrade (which only affects out of warranty systems) is the causing this failure? The few that are in warranty are being upgraded and replaced (Oh, must have been a componant failure). The rest are bing scrapped due to a bad BIOS upgrade (Oh, must have been a componant failure). Who is asking: Wow, must have been a bad BIOS upgrade! Given the history of some makers of motherboards to lie about the cause of the failure, just how are we going to know?

    2. Re:If it's not under warranty, why listen to them? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      I think I just found a LSI employee...

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    3. Re:If it's not under warranty, why listen to them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suck a dick.

  54. Responsibility by gd2shoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is a degree of truth in what you're saying. He does shoulder responsibility here.

    On the other hand, what the vendors have done is childish, at best. They have suggested he do something to the hardware, they participated (wrote the update), and when the metaphorical window broke, they ran like miscreants. Their mothers should really give them a firm talking to and send them to apologize.

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    1. Re:Responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not they (dell) its he (some guy works for Dell) probably suggested firmware upgrade to get cheapskate guy trying to blag free support off the phone.

    2. Re:Responsibility by gd2shoe · · Score: 2

      No. "[Dell] listed the update as 'critical,' and has removed older versions of the BIOS". That's not the work of some mere phone support peon.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    3. Re:Responsibility by MurukeshM · · Score: 1

      No, this is the metaphorical equivalent of Ma baking a hard cookie and the kid feeding it to his old Grandpa, breaking Grandpa's remaining teeth.

    4. Re:Responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dell always has a link to 'Previous Versions' of the BIOS. I call BS that they 'removed older versions of the BIOS.'

      In fact, on this one page, there are direct links to the 12 previous versions: http://www.dell.com/support/drivers/us/en/04/DriverDetails/Product/poweredge-1950?driverId=G50YP&fileId=3000127360&osCode=WNET#OldVersion

    5. Re:Responsibility by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Dell always has a link to 'Previous Versions' of the BIOS. I call BS that they 'removed older versions of the BIOS.'

      That's possible. It is also possible that they reposted older versions as a response to complaint or this slashdot thread, or that there was a glitch on the server making archived versions temporarily unavailable. I'd take it for what it is, an anecdote on the Internet: neither proven nor disproven, either enlightening or slanderous.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  55. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by greg1104 · · Score: 2

    The failure rate on many computer related things floats at some fraction of a percent. If you've only done a few hundred of them, it wouldn't surprise me that you haven't seen a BIOS failure. It's not that unlikely from a statistics standpoint, just like two bad updates in a row is unlikely--but it's surely happening to some unlucky soul.

    I got a shipment of 500 motherboards once that turned out to need an update before they could be deployed, to add support for the CPUs purchased. A bit under 1% of those BIOS updates didn't work out and the boards had to be RMAd. It was less of a problem than ones that were DOA though, where the system wouldn't even boot far enough to do the update. (These were Asus board in 2003, and I dream of DOA rates this low now)

  56. Yes and no. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Yes, you should name the companies.

    No, there's nothing else you can do about it.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  57. IF IT AINT BROKE DONT FIX IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this so damn hard for computer nerds to understand. Sounds like you had two working pieces of equipment and just HAD to fuck with it.

  58. Names don't matter by FrankSchwab · · Score: 1

    They really don't, unless the Internet can use it to put together a list of companies that actually take engineering seriously, and have a bulletproof firmware update procedure.

    I've shipped dozens of devices to production that might need reflashing in the field. It's easy to create a reflash procedure that works reliably (meaning half a dozen times on one configuration) on the engineer's desk, and reliably (meaning several dozen times on several devices) in QA. It's very difficult to create a reflash procedure that works reliably on a million units in the field, in a million different configurations, in a million different locations. Especially when the product was built with barely sufficient FLASH for the normal runtime image, much less a duplicate image to revert to.

    It's similar to coding - for anyone who's done any significant amounts of production 'C' code, you quickly realize that error handling ends up being three or four times as much code as the mainline code that solves the problem you're trying to solve. Now, try to handle an error after you've erased your runtime image in Flash. It's not easy.

    Companies that don't spend the engineering effort to get this right end up with many bricks in the field. Companies that do spend the engineering time to get it right still end up with a few - it's kind of unavoidable in the current state of the art.

    --
    And the worms ate into his brain.
  59. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

    Perhaps there is a way to re-flash it back to the older firmware?

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  60. Depends on the System by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    For your server grade stuff, sure.

    But consider, at my work a standard desktop is under $400. We buy them by the thousand, so we get decent machines at cheap prices.

    Let's just consider the flash chip. At $400/machine, you'd need a failure rate in excess of .25% to make putting that component in a socket be worth it. That's before figuring that if it takes $100 in labor to diagnose and repair, if it happens in year 4-5 it might not be worth it at all.

    While I've flashed stuff at both home and work; I have to say I've done it far more often at home. At work stability is king, we don't really change components in the desktops, so no compatibility issues to crop up, thus no need to flash.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  61. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Jmc23 · · Score: 2
    Why the answer is extremely simple. You ask what support they would provide if the flash fails. Then you use your discretion.

    Logic would dictate that if the piece is no longer functioning as desired you flash anyways as replacement is inevitable.

    In other words, stop being a whingey bitch, recognise the inevitable, make informed decisions, and accept responsibility for them.

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  62. RESET Bios (Reset CMOS) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you tried resetting your bios? This works when a system bios update bricks your machine.
    http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=reset%20cmos&source=web&cd=2&sqi=2&ved=0CDoQtwIwAQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DPdp_L5IxaNI&ei=ZvkXUfqnLK-10QHC8YDoCw&usg=AFQjCNEt2ZbZPdVVpwir-fZxV_94mG3Azg&bvm=bv.42080656,d.dmQ

  63. What to do ?? by Hymer · · Score: 1

    Restore the backup. IBM and Asus ask you to save a copy of the previous BIOS before the upgrade and they also provide a restore utility.

  64. Re:You should flash new stuff out of the box as th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should flash new stuff out of the box as they can be quite behind.

    Not applicable here, he said it was an out of warranty system. Pretty far from "new stuff out of the box."

  65. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Bomarc · · Score: 1

    Perhaps there is a way to re-flash it back to the older firmware?

    Unfortunately - no. The system will not (complete) the post to get to the level of ability to flash. ALSO, Dell does not have previous version(s) available. (Note: I've already ordered ANOTHER replacement motherboard)

  66. AsRock by AlleyTrotte · · Score: 1

    Just happened to me Upgrading my AsRock motherboard UEFI firmware stalled at "Processing Crashless..." How ironic is that Anyway a phone call to AsrockAmerica, they requested I email a copy of invoice which I got from NewEgg. Two days latter new bios chip in the mail And Bobs your uncle. Very pleased with the response. John PS it was on a Linux system and no one even chirped once about not supporting Linux.

  67. Name or shut up by mauriceh · · Score: 1

    Name the companies and the products.
    Otherwise you risk being deemed a "whiny bitch"
      or simply a pot-stirrer.

    What good does this do without that information? Who can it help?

    --
    Maurice W. Hilarius Voice: (778) 347-9907
  68. In my opinion... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    BIOS flashing shouldn't be that scary thing that might brick your computer. It's just software. Manufacturers should take the responsibility that their BIOS updates work.

  69. Uhh, that's what spares are for. by buttfuckinpimpnugget · · Score: 0

    If you do this on a production machine without testing first you are 100% to blame. You can cry about how 'someone told me to' all day. Is this not common sense?

  70. Only upgrade firmware if you have nothing to lose by McDutchie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After bricking three successive broadband routers using firmware upgrades recommended by their respective manufacturers, my position on firmware upgrades is simple: NEVER do them, unless you have nothing to lose (i.e. if your device is working so badly that you would need to replace it anyway).

  71. upgraders should not brick by freshfromthevat · · Score: 1

    It is bad design if their upgrade programs brick their devices against all recovery methods. I've worked for several companies as a firmware engineer and our products were not brickable. The bootloader is not customer flashable, everything else is. Several of my products were RAID controllers in competition with LSI. I would suggest shouting far and wide that a consumer upgrade procedure was capable of bricking their device. Even the small computers which use uboot and like-bootloaders can be field recovered using an inexpensive (under $50) bring-up device if the manufacturers so choose. Designs like graphics controllers should have a recovery method using a PC app which placed the executable into RAM and then the user forces the graphics card into a special boot mode which looks for the executable at a pre-defined address.
          I've never worked on a PC motherboard main-CPU design but I would think that a good BIOS design should have an A-image and a B-image where you can not bootload the A-image from itself and vice-versa.

    --
    .. Blub falls right in the middle of the abstractness continuum. -- Paul Graham
  72. Ran into this on an Acer laptop. by Bryan+Bytehead · · Score: 1

    I upgraded the BIOS, I think it had to do with turning on a virtual mode.

    Bricked it like nobody's business. Nothing like a blank screen when you turn it on.

    My previous desktop was easy to flash, and had a large enough flash chip that it actually kept the old image, and you could boot it so that it would recover. Unless, I'm guessing, that it was so bad that it couldn't do much. Makes me wonder. But it never bricked, and I never had an issue.

    --
    Bryan
  73. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It says in practically every BIOS upgrade procedure to first dump the existing bios and save it, so you can restore the old bios if the new one doesn't work out. If you didn't do that, you are an idiot for not following the manufacturers instruction.

  74. Good Samaritan Laws by obtuse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My main concern is this: If the manufacturer gets punished for failing to properly support out of warranty hardware, they'll just stop altogether. Too many manufacturers will already refuse to talk to you about out of warranty equipment.

    Since they tried to help, I'd prefer not to see them punished for this mistake. Think of it like good samaritan laws: They protect a person who stops to offer aid to the injured, from being sued.

    My other thought is that perhaps there was some hidden problem that something in the update triggered. Updates often have new functionality, or may write to memory not used before, so it isn't too hard to imagine them tickling an existing bug. For a car analogy, imagine you bought a used car from a friend and complained that it shook horribly at 75, but since your friend never went over 65 he never noticed when the tires and alignment deteriorated to that point.

    Finally, I'm appalled that they don't make old firmware versions available. That would be the appropriate response to your problem. Hopefully you can find someone helpful who has the old firmware around, either inside or outside the companies. Definitely appropriate for people to be warned that these updates can cause problems.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
    1. Re:Good Samaritan Laws by MurukeshM · · Score: 1

      Maybe Dell doesn't supply old firmware to prevent more lawsuits.

  75. Ask them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What specific bug you've hit and why they think upgrading the firmware will fix it. If they can't give you a good answer then don't upgrade. P.s this is why software RAID (e.g zfs, lvm, bttrfs) is better for home computers and servers (RAID card independant). Also this is why an enterprise server or storage array would be under a maintenance agreement.

  76. It is possible to unbrick! I did it before by leehwtsohg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm too far down for this comment to really matter, but in general, it is possible to unbrick a failed BIOS flash. The reason is that already for some time all (or maybe almost all) manufacturers have two parts of the BIOS - one that gets updated, and a second part that never does, or maybe can't. The second part (actually it is the first), only has very rudimentary software. It can read floppy disks, but not much more than that. The idea is exactly that you can recover from a failed flash.

    That means that to recover, you need to get the right program into a floppy, with the right BIOS on it. You then boot into this special flash mode, which often means pressing some key combination. I've done it on an LE1700 that I bought of e-bay, and I'm pretty sure you can do it on almost any computer.
    In some more modern BIOSes you don't need a floppy, but can do it with a USB stick.
    I'm too lazy to do a thorough search for the exact procedure, but here are two good links that I found:
    http://www.mydellmini.com/forum/dell-mini-10v/18080-how-unbrick-mini-10v-using-floppy-drive.html (this will work also on other computers, I think)
    http://www.wikihow.com/Reflash-BIOS
     

    1. Re:It is possible to unbrick! I did it before by Bomarc · · Score: 1
      Thank you for an honest attempt. The number of snide, inappropriate, does not apply, you shouldn't have, I wouldn't.....

      .... Thank you.

      I'll look into it further, but I don't think it will work. The problem is this system has "firmware", BMC. The BMC must be working for floppy disc. (I believe that the BMC actually controls the outside access). As such, unfortunately I don't think this solution will work.... But I will look into it -- who knows, I might be surprised!

    2. Re:It is possible to unbrick! I did it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used a similar trick on a bricked machine. Went extra to buy a floppy drive and floppies, and it worked!

      mod parent up!

    3. Re:It is possible to unbrick! I did it before by leehwtsohg · · Score: 1

      Here is the thread describing my troubles, with some more info and better links.
      http://www.tabletpcbuzz.com/showthread.php?38208-double-trouble-double-brick
      It is called a "crisis recovery disk". Now that you have the magic words, googling should be easy.

    4. Re:It is possible to unbrick! I did it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will second this. I have done hundreds of flash updates since the early-mid 90s and have had a few fail through no fault of mine. Well, one was the wrong BIOS for the MB but I _assumed_ the flasher would refuse to do the update, or worst-case I could use the floppy recovery but no joy.

      Usually you need a freshly formatted floppy with just 1 BIOS image file, but yes, the instructions are your friend.

      Yes, some BIOSes will (also) recover from USB stick (no floppy controller on MB.)

    5. Re:It is possible to unbrick! I did it before by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      most new bioses have a recovery sector which can be used to boot a very small flash utility.
      A lot of old bioses do not have this feature. There used to be a age where bioses were socketed and were read/write all the time with no recovery. If you screwed up or the update was faulty, you would have to send at least the chip in to be reburned or the entire board if it wasn't socketed.
      You're also talking about raid controller bioses which were probably not socketed. Most people don't want to unsolder the bios chip and send it in, especially if the manufacturer is not supporting repair work on them because they're old.

    6. Re:It is possible to unbrick! I did it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OP was talking about, amongst other things, hardware RAID cards.

      You can't boot into another BIOS on those, floppy or no floppy.

  77. Easy, you should not be the first one ... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

    On top of that make an internet research about the upgrade.

    Honestly: if you are in a corporate environment there is no reason _inside_ to upgrade stuff, regardless what reason is given by the vendors, except in very rare cases. (E.g. girewalls etc. are protecting you, so how should a security flaw _inside_ be a _serious_ problem?)

    With inside I mean the computers/hardware inside of your corporate network.

    What I want to say: judge if an upgrade is so serious you need to install it immediately.

    Make a google/internet research what others say about it. If possible wait until you get enough google hits. Likely you only get hits if something went bad with the upgrade. So chose your timeframe.

    German companies, I mean big ones, but its true for smaller ones as well, e.g. never upgrade to a new Windows version until the one they are currently running is _failing_ (not no longer supported, but: _failing_).

    Of course this approach does not work, e.g. if a BIOS or firmware upgrade needs to be done for your gateways (routers to the outside) or similar.

    In such cases obviously you need a backup. A replacement router from a different vendor, another RAID controller or another set of harddrives, what ever you do.

    I remember an online game where suddenly there was a new TeamSpeak client available. Lots of people upgraded, with the result that the server rejected the connections, as the server was old and outdated. I keep my TS client as it is and only upgrade when the server rejects me because my client is to old (and I install the new version into a new folder so I can run both at the same time)

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:Easy, you should not be the first one ... by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      (E.g. [f]irewalls etc. are protecting you, so how should a security flaw _inside_ be a _serious_ problem?)

      Ah yes, the hard candy shell/soft creamy filling school of thought on security. Do you allow BYOD in any way? Are company laptops used on public or home networks? Are you *sure* there aren't any vulnerabilities in services you may expose to the world? How secure is your company WiFi? Are there any exposed network ports in public areas which may have a new device sitting near them? What happens when the next $plugin 0-day hits the web?

      There are more than enough ways for malware or an attacker to get behind the one firewall most networks have. Delaying internal updates because "the firewalls will protect me" is moronic if there are security implications. Of course if it's a bugfix for something you consider unimportant that's another matter, but vulnerabilities in anything network-accessible should be considered critical unless it can be made completely inaccessible to untrusted machines.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    2. Re:Easy, you should not be the first one ... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, talking about security was perhaps a bad example. However it is not difficult to tighten your network in a way that you can disable 0-day attack vectors without upgrading the software on all machines.

      My point basically was that you should judge for your self how relevant the upgrade is, and then take the time to evaluate how the vangarde upgraders liked it :)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  78. It's complicated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the device was in warranty when they advised you to flash it, then you bricked it by flashing, and it was the flashing that caused it to fall out of warranty. Then yes it is their responsibility.

    How if it was out of warranty before, then there is no reason it should be in warranty after. At that point it's just a risk you took. You should look at equipment that has longer warranties.

    BTW I've flashed firmware on many devices without any issues. If you used incorrect firmware, or attempt to abort the firmware update because it's taking too long then it's you who damaged the device. You need to follow the directions precisely.

  79. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    I believe that to be an inaccurate assessment.

    Example, was an upgrade that failed. I then removed the chip to flash it on a USB powered flashing device. I could see the chip, I could see the file, I could "write" the file - but every attempt to do so yielded a blank chip when I attempted to read the finished product.

    I gave up, and wrote the original BIOS back to the chip, but that required two attempts to do so.

    I don't understand the process or the chips well enough to even try to explain why, but it happened. Maybe it's as simple a thing as, the new BIOS was a few bytes to big to fit onto the chip. Maybe the chip was faulty in some way, but passed QC inspection. Maybe electricity behaves differently in my county. I don't know, but flashes don't always work right.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  80. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by mvdwege · · Score: 1

    When doing work on machines that are out of support (and the PowerEdge 1950 is old hardware), you take your chances, that's all you can do.

    --
    "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  81. Don't do it. by Kittenman · · Score: 1

    I mean, don't do the BIOS upgrade. Is this a trick question?

    --
    "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
  82. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

    This particular motherboard did not allow downgrades, asshole. I had a lower version firmware but the in-bios utility, the windows flasher, and even the dos flasher refused to do it. As I understand, it's increasingly common with uefi boards (my last two).

  83. Re:Only upgrade firmware if you have nothing to lo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since you mentioned broadband routers, how would you treat security updates? Would you consider a potentially insecure system as nothing to lose?

  84. Dual BIOS is a "workaround" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dual BIOS setups work for 9 out of 10 times, but it won't make the system unbrickable. The true unbrickable solution is to make the critical portion unflashable. BIOS was not supposed to be like an operating system which needs regular update, so if you want to make it flashable you need another pre-BIOS environment that needs/accepts no upgrade and can load up a good BIOS. Some motherboards already had this feature back in the Pen4 era, but they used floppies for re-flashing so I don't know if it's still possible.

  85. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a stupid question in response to your question - how in the fuck do you expect to find that out here at Slashdot? Talk to a lawyer. Save our time with this insipid bullshit. We get it. If you're so big into following advice, follow the only piece of advice that is more than populist masturbation or insufferable ego-driven bullshit.

  86. bleeding edge - snail on a razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Merchantilism - "the economic theory that trade generates wealth and is stimulated by the accumulation of profitable balances, which a government should encourage by means of protectionism."
    Complexity is the enemy of utility.
    I still like the comments from Walking on thin ice By Peter de Jager, an international speaker on the subject of change and technology. He testified before Congress on the Year 2000 problem. ...
    Here's a good example of a well-known Mac application that can't handle a very simple Year 2000 entry. ...
    When I purchased * (in 19XX, version 1.5), I didn't intend to use it for a limited time only. I bought it to perform a particular task for as long as I had reason to perform that task. "Ah ha!" I can hear you cry, "he's not on the most recent version! That's why he's having a problem!" Sorry, but you're missing the point and making a very interesting assumption about the computer software industry. * version 1.5 does everything I want an accounting product to do, so why should I shell out more money for features I don't need, can't afford, or choose not to acquire? ...
    I don't know if the concept of mandatory upgrades has been communicated to corporate America. And I don't believe the concept is ethical.
    One could argue that the Year 2000 problem in * is a bug, and we all know unexpected bugs are beyond our control. We accept that it's impossible to eradicate all bugs. We live in the real world.
    Fair enough. But this expiration date is not unexpected. The programmers of * knew it exists -- after all, they created a specific error message to inform users who violate the allowable range of dates. Hardly what you would describe as an "unexpected" bug.

  87. What if there's no vendor left standing? by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

    Just curious, what do you do when all the vendors in an area have screwed you over? Do without critical hardware?

    1. Re:What if there's no vendor left standing? by tepples · · Score: 1

      what do you do when all the vendors in an area have screwed you over?

      Let me guess: you're talking about utilities and last-mile ISPs. In this case, while preparing to relocate your business to another city, explain your problems with these vendors at city hall.

  88. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No his statement is not. I too have flashed hundred of devices and bios/firmware upgrades tp hundreds more. I do manage a half dozen of the systems and cards in question along with a dozen 2950's that often times have the same Dell PERc branded LSi controller. A quick google search will show you that there are 6 plus years of bios/firmware for said machine. I know every time I go to the dell site for firmware I find myself cussing them because I don't want every decimal version that has been put out for the last 10 years. If you follow the instructions to the letter (and the 1950 and 1950 have a floppy or usb emulated floppy) you will not have a problem unless you have a faulty chip. While I don't upgrade the bios unless I am specifically fixing an issue either, I have yet to have one brick a device. Failure is a more probably the outcome which generally leaves you with no change or forced to do it again a couple of more times.

  89. You are overreacting by Dunge · · Score: 2

    I flashed hundreds of BIOS in my lifetime, never once had this broke something.

  90. BIOS flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any firmware update such as a BIOS flash should be done only after the hardware manufacturer has installed an EEPROM flash chip that is at least twice the size of the code being written to it.
    If the new firmware is being downloaded and then installed, the firmware should be loaded into the unused portion of the flash chip. Then a CRC or better check sum done on the code in the unused part of the flash chip. Then and only then should the new firmware be loaded into the main section of the flash chip and rebooted.
    The firmware upgrade program should also store the original flash code in RAM. Then after a re-flash with the new firmware, but before a reboot, it should compare the new code with the code in the aux part of the flash. If they are not the same, the original code should be flashed back into the EEPROM.

    This does mean that the hardware device maker needs to install a flash EEPROM that is at least four times in size of the original flash code. But these chips are cheap. And any user-controlled flash upgrade is inherently flaky.

  91. Not enough info by slacka · · Score: 2

    I'm an IT pro, and I have flashed thousands of devices in my career. Hundreds of MB'a and countless HDs, cd-roms, RAID controllers, and amd network devices like WAPs. The only time I have bricked a device is when I lost power in the process. Even then, I was able to recover the device with some googling.

    Maybe I've been lucky or maybe just buy H/W from good manufactures like Cisco, Dell, and HP.

    1. Re:Not enough info by joelsplace · · Score: 1

      Only had one bad flash in 20 years that actually bricked something and I flash everything I can get my hands on. I figure they don't release updates for fun. To risky for the manufacurer. If you are in the US I would contact the BBB and see if that helps. Some companies ignore BBB complaints and some really get responsive. Definately let us know who they are.

  92. Re:Only upgrade firmware if you have nothing to lo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen that.

  93. Toshiba. by taxman_10m · · Score: 1

    First off, I wasn't advised to do a BIOS update. I was updating the BIOS just to have an updated BIOS. In the middle of the update process the laptop power cut out. I was pretty certain that I had bricked it. I called Toshiba and they agreed that yes I had bricked it. There was nothing to be done they said except buy a new motherboard for the laptop which is about the same price as buying a new laptop. I didn't accept that as a final answer.

    After some panicked googling I came across info on an "emergency" way to flash the BIOS. It involved having the BIOS file on a thumbdrive and pressing some key combo on boot up. That worked, which was great. What really tees me off is that Toshiba support didn't tell me about this alternative way to flash the BIOS. I doubt that they were unaware of it.

  94. The general rule to BIOS upgrades is... by mpfife · · Score: 2

    ...unless you're experiencing a problem expressly fixed by a BIOS patch - do NOT update your BIOS.

    As much as I like to upgrade like the next guy - I've experienced far more problems than fixes with most bios updates. The only time I update now is when they specifically fix a problem I'm having.

    In the case of your 'really expensive' stuff or essential hardware - if it's just a security patch - get a nice $50 router with firewall and plug your device into that. No use risking or destroying a piece of essential hardware on a BIOS update that is ALWAYS a risky operation.

    And shame them. Shame them publicly on reviews and on their forums. Be courteous by not using foul language or being irate - but state the facts and how they treated you. If they don't realize this is super-bad PR, then these guys likely don't deserve your business.

  95. Fleet of 1950s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I manage a fleet of 1950s and constantly upgrade all the components' firmware/BIOS. I've yet to "brick" a server.

  96. Bricked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am no expert, but often my friends and acquaintance call me when they do something stupid to their machines. I have had a few calls about flashed bios and my solution is always the same, remove the lithium battery on the motherboard, restart, tell them not to do that again. I don't know where I picked up that trick but removing the battery seems to revert a motherboard back to default bios/settings. Does anyone care to comment on this? I know if you ask your manufacture for help they will just tell you to buy a new chipset, is this some sort of secret they don't want to get out? I know most people say your motherboard is done when a flash goes wrong, but this has always worked for me.

  97. Do not update firmware out of warranty by mysidia · · Score: 1

    What more could be said? You risk bricking the device, and having the manufacturer say just that.

    Don't upgrade firmware yourself out of warranty, unless you have a proven recovery procedure, that you are prepared to follow.

    Unless you are a hacker, and prepared to take extreme measures, such as leveraging an EEPROM programmer to restore the original image..

    Have a manufacturer authorized service provider handle the upgrade, and make sure you transfer a risk of failure to them, or don't do it.

    If a manufacturer suggests you upgrade... which is unusual, usually they won't provide support to customers out of warranty -- if they do, make sure and get it in writing, and get a promise in writing that they will provide a replacement if the upgrade breaks it.

    Or else... pay the manufacturer for out-of-warranty service, and send in the unit.

    It's certainly not reasonable to be expecting support, for free, after expiration of the support, though. The manufacturer is not in the wrong refusing to spend money, that wasn't part of the warranty or expected cost of their sale of the hardware to you.

  98. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Don't argue with Dogma. Those that believe it don't listen and nobody else cares.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  99. Re:Flashed hundreds of devices - no problems. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    A Jackass like the first AC with the whole 'blaming the victim' dogma?

    The key question remains, is he a victim of his own incompetence, a malicious company or an 'act of god' (shit happens). Your assumptions aren't valid ether.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  100. Something a bit similar with PlayStation 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am in a somewhat similar situation currently with my PlayStation 3. Hadn't turned it on for a while, bought a game and it worked just fine except for refusing to connect to the PlayStation Network because the software wasn't up-to-date. Ran the system update after which the DVD-drive didn't work, nor is it even recognized by the system. Not sure what happened, a hardware failure during the update is of course a possibility but for something that doesn't use the drive it sounds very unlikely. Apparently because it is out of warranty they refuse any responsibility and I'd need to buy a new one.

    The reason why I mention this is that the discussion on the case of the OP seemed to be taking the 'what is the legal status of recommendations?' path. In this case not doing the system update does in fact disable critical functionality of the system and can thus be considered 'not a recommendation or even optional'. The end result still seems to be the same though.

  101. User error. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like youre just a tard and messed up the flash. If there really was some inherent problem with the bios it wouldnt just be some jackass on slashdot posting about it. It would be well known and widely reported by well, credible and intelligent places that could find out if it is indeed the problem.

    I bet if tried to change your own oil and put in cooking oil, or didnt put the new filter on after taking the old one off you would complain that the car company gave you bad directions in the owners manuals because it specifically didnt say "do not put crisco in your engine during an oil change". Or if the car company says "You need to change your oil every 5,000 miles" so you change it every 5k miles and one day a rod breaks, piston head cracks or something do you automatically throw a tantrum because the car manufacturer wont replace it because the car is out of warranty? "BUT YOU SAID TO CHANGE THE OIL! I KNOW ITS OUR OF WARRANTY BUT ITS STILL YOUR FAULT!"

    If you want to rant then just shut up and blog it.

    Lets face facts. Stuff dies, if its out of warranty when it dies then how can you complain? If you honestly expect every single pc part ever to last forever then your a dildo brain. Go buy a new one and shut up already.

    Honestly, if this is your biggest problem in life then you have no problems.

    1. Re:User error. by Skapare · · Score: 1

      I basically agree with you. However, if they are going to give the advice out to idiots, they really should make it idiot proof

      A simple way to do this is a 2 stage BIOS with a starter PROM that does VERY minimal duty so i'ts hard to screw up. The starter PROM does only TWO things. 1. It tests one specific on-board USB port for a device with a specific code being present. If present, it will check for a partition containing a checksummed image that is not the same as the one already present. If the checksum validates, it will use that image to perform a re-flash maybe followed by a hard reboot. 2. Jump to the flash entry point.

      Manufacturer provides the image file with integrated checksum, and an optional utility program for lamers to use that wipes the USB MBR, makes one partition the size of the file, and copies the file to that partition. If they want to prevent others from making these, they encrypt the image or checksum with something the first state boot PROM can decrypt.

      The idea is an idiot can download the new image file and the USB transfer program. The idiot runs the program tells it where the file was stored (this may be hard for some idiots). When USB is complete, plug USB into the special on-board port (can be extended out to the back on some machines), and hard boot (reset or power cycle). It gets automatically flashed. If it fails, do over. Idiot may need a 2nd computer if yet another file needs to be used.

      A smarter machine will have 2 flash spaces to keep a backup.

      Manufacturers need to support idiots as those are now their largest customer base.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  102. flashrom anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All it takes is a 25pin d-sub and a couple of wires so make a rayer_spi cable...

  103. I bricked minr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bricked about 4 hardisk. 2 from office computer. 3 is Seagate SATA drive and 1 is WDC SATA drive. I have to upgrade since they told me those drive have problem of data corruption on transfering to its SATA channel.

    When i applied those firmwares. Immediately, it dies...

    I NEVER

  104. BIOS Chips themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The chips themselves are anywhere from 10-100 dollars to buy, if you find a blank one, (or if you get lucky and find one with the right version), and then you need to have an expert or someone with the equipment to flash a version of the BIOS, a version that last worked for you.. I bought a Biostar MB, I had to update the bios but the update (which was from the official BioStar site) but it completely failed. I have successfully flashed BIOS chips several times by closely following every step with different boards so the update for this board was a waste.

    The Ebay approach is a joke they almost always jack up the price, the board was around 100 bux when I built my system, Ebay wanted 300!! I could not find the board anywhere else including the online stores I had used to research the best price, and purchase the board, even surplus stores where out of them..

    The MB Makers should be the ones responsible for this problem, after it happened to me, I used forums or search engines to find comments or reviews on if a BIOS upgrade was effective or it caused a crash.

  105. When i fail to update a BIOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tear apppart that computer then i hook it to an SPI programmer made of spare wires and an old parallel port.

    Then when it's back to working again i start disassembling the damn bios update to fix the problem on my own and to add even more locked features.

    Most of all never contact support, that's the last thing on earth that can bring you help on your journey.

    Then i live happy and have many children.

  106. Well, I've flashed bioses, firmwares and roms for 20 years, and never once bricked anything. Maybe that's because I usually read the instructions carefully and follow them religiously. I say this is the case of RTFM.

  107. Name them by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    Name the companies, they screwed you over.

    I never do firmware or bios upgrades unless there is a very, very good reason. These things have a habit of bricking equipment.

  108. Re:Only upgrade firmware if you have nothing to lo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever used Sky Broadband in the UK? They auto-upgrade firmware out of your control and have the router rigged up for central control at the ISP. It's quite a testament to how safe firmware upgrades really are given they rarely ever break down.

    BUT: I hacked away updating/control by editing XML files (now points at 127.0.0.1) because I don't trust Rupert Murdoch after the news scandals.

  109. Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've flashed enormous numbers of devices over the years (personal devices, friend's devices, as well as large quantities of everything at work) and have never bricked a single one. What exactly is it that you *did* brick?

  110. You probably already agreed to no warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You probably accepted an EULA when you rain the BIOS flashing tool that gave you no warranty.

    Don't flash your BIOS unless something is broke.

    Buy a new motherboard with multi-year support if you need that.

  111. next-business-day on vostro laptop by Chirs · · Score: 1

    I bought a bottom-end vostro laptop for personal use, but since it's a "business" computer it had next-business-day warranty.

    Sure enough, I had a little keyboard glitch and called it in and they overnighted a new keyboard to my city and the next day a tech showed up to install it. It was pretty sweet.

    1. Re:next-business-day on vostro laptop by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I tell friends and family (and random strangers on the Internet) to only buy Dell's business-class machines for that service. Its much much faster and better than their home PC service.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  112. You aren't alone by Kultiras · · Score: 1

    I went through this back when I was in high school. Compaq insisted that a BIOS update for my laptop would resolve an issue I was having with the PCMCIA slot under Windows 2000. The BIOS update bricked the motherboard, and the BIOS recovery procedures did not work. They then washed their hands of the problem because the laptop was out of warranty. To say that I was livid would be a gross understatement...at sixteen years old I didn't have the means to run out and buy a replacement. Laptops still cost $1200 at a minimum back then, and even ebaying an old used laptop would have cost $700+. I considered taking the issue to local media so that I could get some sort of response from Compaq, but ultimately decided it wasn't worth the effort (plus, you know, I was sixteen, so I figured I wasn't going to be taken seriously).

  113. TOMTOM !!!!!!!! by burisch_research · · Score: 1

    This has happened to me.

    My GPS, a TomTom Via 220 (I think that's the model) ... well, I got an email from TomTom saying that there was a MANDATORY SOFTWARE UPDATE. They warned that the gps would stop working a week later if the flash wasn't done.

    I followed all of the instructions to the letter, including making sure it was fully charged. Then I had an expensive brick. The thing won't boot any more, it's totally useless. Their response? Sorry, out of warranty.

    I feel violated.

    --
    char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
  114. Re:Only upgrade firmware if you have nothing to lo by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

    After bricking three successive broadband routers using firmware upgrades recommended by their respective manufacturers, my position on firmware upgrades is simple: NEVER do them, unless you have nothing to lose (i.e. if your device is working so badly that you would need to replace it anyway).

    Isn't "the device working so badly that you need to replace it" pretty much the standard situation for broadband routers, whether or not you have the latest firmware?

  115. use open-source bios by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like superbios or coreboot when company code has bricked the computer

  116. Why update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a saying where I'm from.. "if it's not broke, don't fix it."

    Why do a bios update if you didn't need to?

  117. "critical" means "risky" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After my "critical" BIOS upgrade landed my perfectly functional TOSHIBA Satellite laptop on the trash heap, the telephone support rep asked "What problem were you trying to fix?" To which I answered, "none". After much back and forth, I concluded that "critical" is someone's synonym for "risky". And that was only the last straw. Overall, the main benefit of the TOSHIBA experience has been to help me truly appreciate my ACER experience. No more TOSHIBAs for me.

  118. Simple by meimeiriver · · Score: 1

    It's very simple: "Don't fix it if it ain't broken." Going beyond is an extra (unnecessary) risk.

    Whether a slashdot editor having a few bad experiences with BIOS updates is worth a whole featured /. article, is another matter.

  119. re: What To Do When an Advised BIOS Upgrade Is Bad by geoffatdell · · Score: 1

    Bomarc: I am sorry to hear of your issues with your PowerEdge server and would like to discuss them with you. Please email me at dellcarespro@dell.com and I will take on your case.

  120. Re:TOMTOM !!!!!!!! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    My GPS, a TomTom Via 220 (I think that's the model) ... well, I got an email from TomTom saying that there was a MANDATORY SOFTWARE UPDATE. They warned that the gps would stop working a week later if the flash wasn't done.

    How would the device know that there was a software update? Do TomTom have access to the stream of signals from the GPS satellites to all GPS devices, whether or not made by TomTom, and include a way to brick them too? What would happen if some non-US military power hacked into this communications channel through GPS signals and sent out a virus to all US military GPS devices turning them off? then the US military would be blind, and the Foreign Power (TM) could invade at will.

    Or is there possibly some other communications channel into the device which TomTom intend using? In which case, just disable that channel. Then TomTom can't brick your device. "No communications channel" equals "no malware entry route."

    What input does a GPS device need other than a GPS radio signal? Oh, and power (available from Chinese batteries at a store near you).

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  121. Re:TOMTOM !!!!!!!! by burisch_research · · Score: 1

    This model uses GPRS to get realtime traffic information. I am guessing that the format of this stream was changing, so they had to update firmware. Personally I decided to upgrade before the deadline. There is no way to disable the GPRS channel that I am aware of -- and I wanted to keep the traffic info, as it was extremely useful to me for avoiding frequent jams.

    --
    char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
  122. Re:TOMTOM !!!!!!!! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Hmmm, "GPRS" ... the name is familiar, but I don't associate it with GPS. It's some sort of terrestrial radio system, isn't it? Which I guess provides the "real time traffic information"?

    Are you talking about a SatNav system, not a GPS system? A SatNav that uses GPS for it's positioning data and has some other junk related to cars and roads, and TomTom have broken that other stuff?

    You can't disable the SatNav functions and retain the GPS functions? Yeuch - remind me to not get one of those, even if they're remaindered.

    The SatNav my wife got me a few years ago was bloody atrocious too - it wouldn't output any of it's GPS information either, and it's maps were at least 20 years out of date in our area AFTER the "get updated maps" operation, and they wanted a 2 year (=£720) commitment to a subscription before they'd even accept bug reports for their maps. Still, it provides endless entertainment as the "deranged crack addict", which is about as much as one expects from such things. And it does get some roads right - you just have to know which ones are right. Which rather defeats the object of the exercise, doesn't it?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  123. I made the mistake of trusting a MB manufacturer.. by DirtyLiar · · Score: 1

    Because they made good motherboards, so I assumed that they also made good BIOS update software.

    I was upgrading my mothers computer, and decided at the last minute to top it off with the latest BIOS. The manufacturer (a famous 3 letter name brand) offered not only the standard DOS bootable upgrade, but also an "In Windows" BIOS updater. And even though my experience and knowledge told me that this was EXTREMELY unlikely, I assumed that if they were offering it as the preferred method of doing a year old BIOS update, and since I couldn't find any posts either complaining about it, that they'd figured out how to do a BIOS upgrade from inside Windows.

    BAD decision.

    My first hint that the BIOS upgrade didn't take was that their verification program kept saying it didn't work. I tried loading both the old and new BIOS, but the final check always failed. I kept the computer on for three days knowing that if I reboot it, that it'd become a brick. And of-course, when I did finally reboot, it was a brick.

    This really pissed me off because the thing was a really good computer, with several more years of life left in it.

    I even considered buying a chip programmer, but the BIOS was surface mounted, and my desoldering skills are even worse than my soldering skills.

    --

    THINK! It's patriotic

  124. Re:I made the mistake of trusting a MB manufacture by DirtyLiar · · Score: 1

    Lesson (re)learned? "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

    --

    THINK! It's patriotic

  125. Re:TOMTOM !!!!!!!! by burisch_research · · Score: 1

    GPRS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Packet_Radio_Service

    It's the slowest kind of internet access I'm aware of. I believe WAP used to use GPRS for comms. It is really really slow.

    Yeah, this is a satnav -- but these things are commonly referred to as gps units, even though they do more than that.

    --
    char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
  126. Re:TOMTOM !!!!!!!! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    It's the slowest kind of internet access I'm aware of.

    I first started accessing the Internet with a 2400bps modem down a telephone line at 3 i nthe morning - to avoid blocking the line for the other people in the house. And paying £0.042/minute for that access. I'll go and get my Zimmer frame now.

    Yeah, this is a satnav -- but these things are commonly referred to as gps units, even though they do more than that.

    Being commonly referred to as a GPS doesn't make it right to refer to them as GPS units. The common herd may do that, but this s Slashdot, a gathering place for self-proclaimed nerds who do know better.

    I'm holding off from getting a satellite navigation tool to replace the one that was burgled in 2003, in part in anticipation of the installation of the Galileo system and the expansion of the GLONASS system. But I'm also careful about having such systems, because there are places where I've worked (and courted, and I expect to return to, for more work), where possession of such equipment is grounds for being charged with espionage, and nobody sane gives the police the slightest opportunity to detain you.

    The wife got me a SatNav system for my birthday a few years ago. It's good in-car entertainment, fit for laughing at. For navigation ... well, I'm a geologist. I don't do "lost". There are always navigation clues, and you do read and memorise the map of where you're going before you go there. Don't you?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"