Slashdot Mirror


Hockey Sticks Among Carry-On Items TSA Has Cleared For Planes

coondoggie writes "As of April 25th the Transportation Security Administration will let a bunch of previously prohibited items such as small pocket knives and what it calls 'novelty' or toy bats to be taken on aircraft as carry-ons. The idea the agency said was to let Transportation Security Officers better focus their efforts on spotting higher-threat items such as explosives and guns."

65 of 276 comments (clear)

  1. we're nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let us know when they change their policy on light sabers.

    1. Re:we're nerds by funwithBSD · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you can't tell them "This is not the lightsaber you are looking for." and make it it stick... you don't deserve to carry a lightsaber.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  2. where do you store it? by lseltzer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It won't fit under the seat in front of you or the overhead bin.

    1. Re:where do you store it? by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It would get checked at the gate, just like any other large item. So it still wouldn't be brought onboard a plane. All this is is an attempt to deflect some of the criticism of the TSA as security theater

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:where do you store it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It would get checked at the gate, just like any other large item. So it still wouldn't be brought onboard a plane. All this is is an attempt to deflect some of the criticism of the TSA as security theater

      Perhaps, BUT consider this. If they do allow items such as "small pocket knives" etc. I think this is just a prelude to another (likely staged) "incident" that they will parade throughout the media proclaiming "See, we are needed. See, there is danger. See, you need to increase our budget and take more citizen rights away. Do it. Do it NOW!"

      You know you want to.

    3. Re:where do you store it? by mjwx · · Score: 2

      It won't fit under the seat in front of you or the overhead bin.

      The flight attendants would take it and store it with the suits. They'd hand it back as you disembarked.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:where do you store it? by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      You could just get a lock with the little TSA identifier on it. They have keys for those.

      The last time I used one of those TSA locks the "key" was a pair of pliers and they took the zipper pulls off with it.

  3. I guess that's OK by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 5, Funny

    as long as people still aren't allowed to carry on enough liquid to make an ice rink.

    1. Re:I guess that's OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The international organization for flight standards (ICAO), that the TSA is now coming into alignment with, is based in Montreal. The hockey stick thing makes sense now, eh?

      Of course, I'm now afraid that if a couple of passengers got into a fight, a hockey game might break out.

  4. Why not actually secure airports? by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You know, so that a woman can't park in an airline employee lot (which requires going through 2 security gates, one that looks at a badge and one that actually has to scan the airport-issued badge before you can park there), board an employee bus, and get dropped off on the ramp. As someone who works at an airport (actually the same one where all this happened), actual airport security is a joke. It is handled by minimum-wage contractors. I know plenty of other stores of people I've worked with that are even worse than this, but for the protection of them and myself I won't bring them up.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  5. Let me get this straight by CncRobot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The TSA is now allowing the actual types of things used on 9/11, but still banning shampoo and bottled water?

    If there is ONE THING the TSA should ban is small knives (not that I agree with that), since they are now allowing those shouldn't they just admit they shouldn't need to exist?

    1. Re:Let me get this straight by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 3

      If you take a look they still ban small knives, just not super tiny toy swiss army knife style ones that people forget are on their keychains.

    2. Re:Let me get this straight by Technician · · Score: 2

      Bummer, my Letherman is still banned. I feel naked without it. I cant open most small electronics packaging without tools.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:Let me get this straight by Amouth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I still remember them making me put an empty clear plastic bottle through the x-ray machine. I love having a water bottle, and my solution is to finish it and then go through the line with it and refill on the other side and not have to pay 2-3$ for a drink on the other side. I was in line, had it in my hand and din't think about it and the lady stopped me at the medal detector and told me i had to put it through the x-ray. Again, they made me x-ray an empty, clear plastic bottle. I was just a bit perplexed.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    4. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, no.

      The real threat isn't another 9/11-type event. They can no longer hijack an airplane with a box cutter, even if the plane is filled with nothing but girl scouts and smurfs. They will be dead before you reach the ground, mission unaccomplished. At worst, one or two people will be stabbed. No one is going to cooperate with these guys for fear of their own lives, because in they will be dead anyway.

      But there is still the threat of someone sneaking a bomb on board to kill all passengers and destroy the aircraft when it is over a city so the debris hurts people and buildings on the ground, etc.

    5. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Matches are allowed, Lighters are not.

      From my time in the Army.:
      On the charter plane my unit was taking all of us had our issued weapons. M4, M249, 240B, etc. They took our lighters away from us because it was against federal flight regulations.

    6. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Matches are allowed, Lighters are not.

      From my time in the Army.:
      On the charter plane my unit was taking all of us had our issued weapons. M4, M249, 240B, etc. They took our lighters away from us because it was against federal flight regulations.

      This happened to me too. The TSA guy says "take off your shoes" and i replied "Dude im holding an M16". Then... took off my damn shoes 0.o

    7. Re:Let me get this straight by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      Lighters are not

      Incorrect.

      Lighters are permitted, just not torch-style, which makes lighting my cigars a little more tricky.

    8. Re:Let me get this straight by TheLink · · Score: 3, Informative

      I doubt most of them are stupid. I believe they're just not _allowed_ to use their brains and discretion in those circumstances, or at least strongly discouraged to do so.

      --
    9. Re:Let me get this straight by cffrost · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lighters are not

      Incorrect.

      Lighters are permitted, just not torch-style, which makes lighting my cigars a little more tricky.

      Tricky? My dear fellow, either type of lighter is perfectly adequate for setting a hundred dollar bill alight, from which all proper gentlemen light their cigars.

      Berkshire Hathaway stock certificates also work well, though I've heard that the uncouth 99.99%er rabble find the practice "obscene." Jeeves is quite adept at tossing them off the clubhouse grounds in short order, so I couldn't say for certain.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    10. Re:Let me get this straight by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

      Funny, but wrong. The elite know better than to use money, paper, matches, or petrol lighters to light their cigars and pipes. Anything other than a smokeless flame will taint the tobacco.

      Anyone who burns money to light their cigar is just demonstrating they still belong in the 99%.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  6. That's great... by evil_aaronm · · Score: 4, Funny

    But I play lacrosse, you insensitive clods!

    1. Re:That's great... by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lacrosse sticks are seriously deadly weapons, but that is mostly becasue they are carried by lacrosse players. Those guys are crazy.

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
  7. Canada! by Mullen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Damn it, now Canadians will be hijacking our planes.

    --
    Linux O Muerte!
    1. Re:Canada! by funwithBSD · · Score: 2

      Or worse, Harry Dresden.

      (the TV version, not the book version)

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    2. Re:Canada! by gman003 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry, just ask them nicely and I'm sure they'll apologize and give them right back.

  8. Better Luggage Handling by lazarus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's face it. The reason people drag all of their worldly possessions with them as carry-on is because we don't trust the baggage handlers to not destroy/steal/lose our stuff. I see this every time I fly. People don't actually want to lug a 49.9 lb wheeled bag onto the plane and then try to find/lift/get help to put it in an overhead compartment.

    The carry-on problem is being caused by the baggage problem. If you solve the baggage problem, TSA security would be checking small handbags or pocket change not hockey sticks, LAN party servers, thirty pairs of shoes, etc.

    Oh, and charging people for checked bags is making the problem worse, not better. What is it about the airline industry that has made every decision maker involved utterly stupid? The only aspect of air travel I can think of that doesn't operate in a wrong-headed way are the mechanics who keep the planes from falling out of the sky.

    {rant/}

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
    1. Re:Better Luggage Handling by Amouth · · Score: 5, Funny

      The only aspect of air travel I can think of that doesn't operate in a wrong-headed way are the mechanics who keep the planes from falling out of the sky.

      {rant/}

      Do your self a favor and don't look into that one too much.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    2. Re:Better Luggage Handling by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      Let's face it. The reason people drag all of their worldly possessions with them as carry-on is because we don't trust the baggage handlers to not destroy/steal/lose our stuff. I see this every time I fly.

      Nope. Until airlines starting charging for baggage a few years back, finding room in the overhead bins was generally pretty easy outside of major business travel routes or high travel volume destinations/times.
       

      Oh, and charging people for checked bags is making the problem worse, not better. What is it about the airline industry that has made every decision maker involved utterly stupid?

      Expedia, Travelocity, Kayak... all the tools that let people chose to fly United instead of Delta because tickets on United are $2 cheaper. Airlines have been in an ongoing price war ever since deregulation in the 70's....and people insist on getting 60's level service at 2013 level prices.
       
      One of the problems with running a business in the US is that Americans, in general, are cheap bastards. Nor is this new... the chain discount places have been exploiting this since the early 20th century.

    3. Re:Better Luggage Handling by Cimexus · · Score: 2

      I think it's just baggage fees in the US that are the problem. People carrying insane amounts of carry on baggage and the whole "get on the plane early so you can get a spot for all your stuff in the overhead lockers" rigmarole is unique to the US - I'd never seen anything like it before I travelled in the US.

      Here in Australia airlines still include at least one checked bag as part of the ticket price. It's always been that way. Not for the discount airlines admittedly (Tiger, Jetstar), but they only have a small part of the market. I'm talking about the mainline airlines that account for the majority of flights (i.e. Qantas, Virgin). So most people check most of their stuff and carry on merely a small laptop bag or purse or something. In fact for short flights (2 hours) I don't carry anything on at all (except for my wallet and phone).

      You don't appreciate how good air travel is in Australia (small to non-existent security lines, RFID check-in and baggage tagging so no check-in lines (on Qantas at least), no need to take your shoes off, no liquids restrictions on domestic flights etc.) until you've compared it to the US. Flying in the US is a chaotic, stressful experience ... here it's a breeze 9 times out of 10.

  9. Typical way of taking away freedom by loganljb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a fairly typical way to permanently take away freedom. Take away a LOT of freedom during an 'emergency', then later give back a small portion of that freedom. People will be so relieved by the small concessions that they forget the larger liberties that they no longer enjoy.

    1. Re:Typical way of taking away freedom by loganljb · · Score: 2

      Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of the liberty to take a real bottle of shampoo on an airplane, or the liberty of not having to arrive at the airport an hour or more early only to be subjected to demonstrably ineffective (and possibly, over the long term, dangerous -- although that hasn't been demonstrated because of the refusal of the TSA to perform actual testing) security theater, or the liberty of not having your toddler groped by an underpaid, undertrained, overzealous, security goon.

      One of the few truly effective security changes since 9/11 was the very simple expedient of adding always locked, reinforced cabin doors.

      While we're on the subject of liberty, someone who had a personal hand in the founding of our country had something very relevant to say about this situation... They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

    2. Re:Typical way of taking away freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah! Like the liberty to be killed by well armed suicidal terrorists who've hijacked my airplane...

      And anyone with basic knowledge of the mechanics of folding card stock could kill you by way of the little boxes of snacks they sell on the flights that used to offer meals.

      Life is dangerous. Deal with it. Or not, I guess - if you're that concerned about a false sense of safety, surely you're for in-flight anesthesiologists? Passengers who are knocked out surely can't hurt anybody. Sure, you'll have to sign a disclaimer because of the risk of death - but hey, my life shouldn't be in danger because you supposedly want to look out the window.

      Keep living on your knees, but please do so on a plastic sheet - the piss running down your legs is getting everywhere.

  10. Re:Oh good by tattood · · Score: 2

    I find it funny that they allow golf clubs, but a maximum of 2.

    --
    WTB [sig], PST!!!
  11. The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by Xanthvar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The ban on knives was cosmetic at best, so the lifting of this ban will not result in any decrease in safety.
    Q: "But wait, didn't the terrorists on 9/11 use box cutters to hijack the plane? Couldn't they do it again?"
    A: No. The reason that they were able to hijack the plane before, is the "rulebook" basically said to go along with the hijackers, you fly off to some other destination, there is a negotiation that drags things out, and eventually everyone leaves alive, with stories to tell their grandchildren... Only, on 9/11 they changed the "rules".

    Today, it doesn't matter what kind of weapon is used to hijack the plane, the bulk of the passengers will use whatever is at hand to beat down the hijackers, because they know they are fighting for their lives now, and if you are going to die, you might as well go down swinging. Coupling this with the _1_ security measure that actually improved airline safety, putting locks on the cockpit doors (which does nothing if they don't actually lock them of course), the chance of hijacking a passenger airliner successfully is almost nil. Maybe a small puddle jumper commuter craft composed of all terrorists would be successful, but in that circumstance, they wouldn't need weapons either.

    Yes, someone can still get hurt, and even killed, but you could do that with a pen/pencil or some other pointy object stabbed into the appropriate place. Now maybe someone from the UK will have a different take on this, as they seemed to fear bladed objects, as they appear to be the primary homicide weapon of choice since the general populace doesn't have access to firearms. As an American male, with military training I am not terribly afraid of knives being used to subdue a a plane full of passengers, whoever foolhardy that may be, as I believe that sheer weight of numbers would incapacitate or kill any would be hijacker in this. For most Americans, a knife is a tool, and not a weapon, and while it can be used as such, so can just about anything else, to include bricks, shoes, rocks, sharp sticks, and harsh language.

    Just my $.02 worth.

    1. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by Ecuador · · Score: 2

      You are right. Apparently there are a lot of people fooled by the post 9/11 security theater and are complaining about this change http://edition.cnn.com/2013/03/06/travel/tsa-carry-on-changes/. These people (air marshals, flight attendants) should know better, but I guess the US government has managed to drop the average citizen IQ by about 20 units in recent years.

      What is interesting is that while I have lost numerous swiss army knives and pocket screwdrivers (I always have a multi-tool with me and I often forget to leave it home or check it in when flying), I have had the added insult of being given metal cutlery (fork & knife) in the flight! The TSA yelled at me "THIS IS A KNIFE!" for a tiny 1-inch blade and then they give me a 4+ inch knife to eat my lunch... I don't remember the airlines with the metal knives, but I think it was Lufthansa once that had these flags nailed on the head-rests. The flag-poles where about 20inches long with an extremely sharp point (that could actually nail the head-rest) and were, sadly, a much better weapon than my foldable screwdriver the TSA had confiscated a few minutes earlier...

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    2. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by jbwolfe · · Score: 3, Informative

      Coupling this with the _1_ security measure that actually improved airline safety, putting locks on the cockpit doors (which does nothing if they don't actually lock them of course)

      While I prefer hiding behind the locked Kevlar door (it's on the pushback checklist), don't forget some of us are armed with Heckler & Koch's and instructions to shoot to kill...

      --
      Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?
    3. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by mutube · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not sure where the comment about the UK and knives came from, or the relevance of being an American male. Your military training might help (assuming you were trained for the situation) but it's not neccessary. In Glasgow, Scotland (UK) an attempted truck-bombing of an airport ended with a baggage handler and other members of the public confronting the terrorists and kicking the crap out of them (to be fair, they were on fire at the time).

      As you say, the game has changed. I don't think terrorists have a hope in hell anywhere in the Western world anymore. If I saw someone pull a knife, gun, bomb-vest in a crowded area I'd run right at them. And that's from a yellow-bellied, knife-fearing subject of her Hajesty.

    4. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by Cimexus · · Score: 2

      Interesting point about the way Americans mostly perceive knives as tools. Makes a lot of sense - I had to admit when I visit the US I notice a LOT of guys carry knives of some description. You would almost never see that here (Australia). Most people see them as weapons. In fact in many (if not all?) States you are simply not permitted to carry knives. For instance, in Queensland:

      Weapons Act 1990 (Qld):

      A person must not physically possess a knife in a public place or a school, unless the person has a reasonable excuse. A reasonable excuse is includes:

      to perform a lawful activity, duty or employment; or
      to participate in a lawful entertainment, recreation or sport

      So if you are a farmer or hiker or circus performer who juggles knives, or doing something else that would reasonably require a knife, it's OK. But if you're just walking down the road to buy some milk, it's an offence. Each State's law varies a bit but you get the picture. In practice you'd have to be incredibly unlucky for a cop to issue you a fine for having a Swiss Army Knife or something on you ... but it's something they can add to the charge sheet if they catch you doing something else, I guess.

      Whereas, in the US I'd be talking to someone, just a regular, nice guy ... and then he'd pull out some pocketknife to open a package or something (including some varieties that would be classed as prohibited weapons in ~any~ situation here). Makes me do a bit of a 'WTF' double-take. Just a different cultural attitude I guess. Only place here you'll find a knife around here is in a tool box or a kitchen drawer.

    5. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by lxs · · Score: 2

      Good. Knitting is an evil activity for evil people, only crochet is worse.
      The forces of good should stick to noble activities like sewing and embroidery.

  12. Re:Sweet by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 2

    Sky marshal's going to have you in the penalty box tout de suite for cracking jokes about security, hoser. Or is it "Atmosphere mounty" up your way?

  13. Re:Thank goodness by drunk_punk · · Score: 2

    Can I assume you're not Canadien and didn't grow up playing hockey?

  14. Re:Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sky marshal's going to have you in the penalty box tout de suite for cracking jokes about security, hoser.

    2:00 minutes for boarding.

  15. Re:This works great until Canadian terrorist hijac by ShogunTux · · Score: 2

    And then, like maple syrup, Canada's evil would ooze all over the United States.

    Which would then lead to our children pledging allegiance to the maple leaf, pouring mayonnaise over everything, winter 11 months of the year, and having Anne Murray on the radio all day, every day.

    Won't somebody think of the children?

  16. Re:Better Luggage Packing by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Informative

    And why are people dragging all of their worldly possessions on a 3-day trip to Ft. Lauderdale? Pack better, and you will see a lot of these problems disappear. I've worked on the ramp several years, and most of the times that I've seen bags damaged/lost (lost as in won't make your flight) is because they are so overpacked or packed lopsided that they fall off a tug, get stuck under other bags weighing 65lbs, or just burst open. It seems like in most cases the bags that are the most overpacked are also bags that are 10 years old, ripped, and have one or both handles broken off. If people didn't overpack as much as they do, things would not be as bad as they are. Also, it seems like most people like to buy these bags that have all these unnecessary buckles, straps, and knobs that get caught on literally everything. The doors and floors of the cargoholds are in most cases not smooth. There are screws sticking up, edges of panels are raised up, and the door designs of MD-88/90/DC-9s are so poorly designed that zippers and other random parts are bound to get stuck and snap off. The best suitcase to buy is one of the harder, plastic 4 wheel spinners, as they are the least likely to get caught, and I don't think I've ever seen broken handles on them. But all of these cheap, flimsy cloth bags with little to no structural support? Of course they're going to get broken, they are made as cheap as possible. And steal stuff? We're lucky if we have 40 minutes to offload 100 bags and put 100 bags back on to a plane. Ignoring the fact that most baggage handlers would never steal stuff, they wouldn't even have the time to steal stuff if they wanted to. Purchase suitcases wisely, use common sense when packing (you dont need 7 outfits and 5 pairs of shoes for a weekend trip ladies, sorry), and your bags will last longer and all your stuff will be waiting for you when you land.

    Oh, and for the love of god, if you buy a puppy from an out of state breeder, drive over there and pick your dog up yourself. Those things get terrified when they get stuck in a cargo hold for 5 hours.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  17. Speed skate blades by GSloop · · Score: 2

    Speed skate blades have never been banned for Carry-on air travel.
    [At least as far as I know - they were legal before this change.]

    And if you know anything about speed-skate blades, you know they're literally RAZOR sharp 17 inch mini-swords.
    They might not be as dangerous as a full-on machete, but pretty damn close.

    When I heard about ice blades being fine for carry-on - I was astonished. You can't bring a razor-blade or a small knife, but 17" clap blades you could shave with? Just peachy!

    The whole BS around airline security is insane.

  18. Re:about time by SourceFrog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oh please, it will be "about time" when they scrap the TSA or replace with it something much smaller, leaner, less expensive, and more effective at what it's supposed to do.

    This amounts to little more than a PR move, throwing a few scraps to the plebs to make us somehow feel like 'common sense is breaking out', and it's pathetic that our standards are so low now, that we actually respond like dogs with tails wagging at this incredibly negligibly small change in the grand scheme of the TSA's operations. Will this in any significant way change the fact that they will continue to suck $8 billion a year of taxpayer money to violate the 4th amendment rights and dignity of American travellers? No? Then what is the "about time" that you refer to?

    --
    My other UID is three digits.
  19. Re:Oh good by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

    Any good golfer can drive with a putter.

    And putt with a pool cue.

  20. Re:Too big? by tompaulco · · Score: 2

    How can a set of golf clubs be a permissible carryon - they exceed the dimensions of a carryon published by the airlines.
    You've seen through their ruse. They're going to allow you to have all these exciting carry-ons, but then the smart people realize that those are too big anyway and can't be allowed on the plane. They will have to be gate checked. So the change in ruling has no effect, other than PR.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  21. Re:about time by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You're on the right track.

    Just disband the whole frigging Homeland Security. Put Customs back as a separate and distinct agency, ditto with Border Patrol. Screw the whole Homeland Security thing. It was bullshit when they thought it up, it's bullshit today. Janet Napolitano spends less time worrying about security, than about how to stop "piracy" and increasing corporate profits. She has her TSA agents stopping traffic on Interstate 40, in Tennessee, and shaking them down. Anyone with a thousand dollars cash is a "suspect". Anyone with an expensive car is a "suspect". Anyone who doesn't kiss the TSA agent's ass is a "suspect". I guess this an alternative for TSA agents who don't prefer fondling little children and old ladies in airports.

    Disband Homeland Security, send Napolitano packing, and we can save the fifty million dollars she just wasted on uniforms.

    Odd that most cops have to purchase their own uniforms, but TSA has a contract to buy uniforms for their degenerate agents.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  22. Re:We got bigger problems by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I may be wrong, but I think that problem was partially solved.

    Remember, for at least 20 years, passengers had been instructed over and over to just cooperate with hijackers. The plane that went down in Pennsylvania, diverted from it's intended target, is proof that the conditioning can be broken.

    All we need to do, is to stop being victims. Fight back, and win or lose, you won't be a hostage.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  23. Re:Am I allowed to take water on yet? by tompaulco · · Score: 2

    Or any liquid in a larger than super-tiny container?

    No, the water ban is beneficial to all parties (except the traveler. Oh, and the environment). Due to not being able to bring in water from outside, and most people not wanting to pay $5 for a thimble of water inside, the airlines are able to keep the weight down on their flights, resulting in a fuel savings of perhaps as much as 25 cents per flight.Over an entire year and an entire flight, this probably adds up to a small amount of folding money.
    And then there are the people who do pay the $5 per thimbleful of water in the airport proper. To the airport vendors, the new regulation was a license to steal. This extra income probably enabled them to buy a whole fleet of congressmen to make sure the rule is never changed.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  24. Re:about time by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    Damn straight.

    Idiotic airport logic used by the TSA goons ...
    http://iwantsomefun.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/airport-logic-liquids-3oz-dangerous.jpg

  25. Re:Oh good by PRMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bin Laden was found in Pakistan and I can assure you that Pakistanis love cricket.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  26. Re:Oh good by mjwx · · Score: 4, Funny

    And through an odd technicality, English Cricket Bats were never banned.

    Overheard on a recent BA flight into JFK.

    English guy 1: I say old bean, what do you say to hijacking this plane before stumps.
    English guy 2: Oooh yes, and we can fly it into the pavilion.
    English guy 1: Smashing.
    English guy 2: Jolly good.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  27. Re:Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sheesh...that's rough, especially when the flight attendants get away with a cross check just before leaving the gate.

  28. Re:Am I allowed to take water on yet? by Jethro · · Score: 2

    You know, I would kinda love to have someone who's not me try that.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  29. Re:Oh good by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not all Pakistanis are terrorists, just the ones who hate cricket.

  30. Re:about time by stainlesssteelpat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, that's below par logic.

    --
    War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, the lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade.- Shelley
  31. Re:Oh good by ryzvonusef · · Score: 2

    Just a pedantic note, but you can either be *hit* for a six, or bowled *out*, not both.

    --
    I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
  32. Re:about time by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

    This amounts to little more than a PR move, throwing a few scraps to the plebs to make us somehow feel like 'common sense is breaking out',

    Keep the ban on toothpaste and water while re-allowing things that could obviously used as weapon is the exact opposite of 'common sense'

    All chemists I've asked confirmed that this harmless liquid 1 + harmless liquid 2 = explosive does not work outside "Die Hard 3" or a well equipped laboratory or chemical plant.

    --
    bickerdyke
  33. hockey stick = polearm by Werrismys · · Score: 2

    What if you attach pocket knives to a hockey stick? The polearm poll yesterday lacked this option.

    --
    'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
  34. Re:about time by dywolf · · Score: 2
    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  35. About time they catch up to the airlines by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2
    For the last several years, when I've gotten bumped up to business or first class (frequently), I've been supplied with real metal silverware. On an Asiana flight last August, I received a steak knife with a 5" serrated blade - and a matching butter knife, salad fork and dinner fork. All metal, all great weapons, all better than the 9/11 hijackers had.

    .
    No need to actually bring your own weapon with you - just book first-class and have the airlines hand them to you!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  36. Re:about time by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    http://original.antiwar.com/paul/2011/10/24/tsa-releases-vipr-venom-on-tennessee-highways/

    http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/10/20/2212225/tsa-doing-random-truck-searches-on-tennessee-highway

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2011/10/25/ron-paul-calls-tsa-jack-booted-thugs-in-response-to-highway-checkpoints/

    The story was carried on a local television news segment, and in the segment, they were stopping automobiles, at random, as opposed to checking the trucks at the weigh stations. Those three links were among the first hits on a google search - there are lots more.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br