Slashdot Mirror


Court: 4th Amendment Applies At Border, Password Protected Files Not Suspicious

An anonymous reader sends this Techdirt report on a welcome ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: ""Here's a surprise ruling. For many years we've written about how troubling it is that Homeland Security agents are able to search the contents of electronic devices, such as computers and phones at the border, without any reason. The 4th Amendment only allows reasonable searches, usually with a warrant. But the general argument has long been that, when you're at the border, you're not in the country and the 4th Amendment doesn't apply. This rule has been stretched at times, including the ability to take your computer and devices into the country and search it there, while still considering it a "border search," for which the lower standards apply. Just about a month ago, we noted that Homeland Security saw no reason to change this policy. Well, now they might have to. In a somewhat surprising 9th Circuit ruling (en banc, or in front of the entire set of judges), the court ruled that the 4th Amendment does apply at the border, that agents do need to recognize there's an expectation of privacy, and cannot do a search without reason. Furthermore, they noted that merely encrypting a file with a password is not enough to trigger suspicion."

10 of 194 comments (clear)

  1. Re:It's still smart to look clean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you cant host it securely online, then mail several MicroSD cards to your destination first to avoid the harassment by the TSA.

    Note: you can easily get a Micro SD through airport security without them questioning you, I forgot about one in my pocket and they did not even see it with the Naked scanners.

    I always swallow my MicroSD card before I begin travel and retrieve it after I arrive at my destination.

    Works great as long as my travel time is less than around 8 - 16 hours. I hate when my travel time is longer and I have to swallow it again.

  2. Re:Hazzah! by Rosyna · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do not worry, Scalia will save us from the Tyranny of the 9th Circuit!

  3. 100 mile border by hawguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now if we could get the Supreme Court to roll back their validation of DHS's declaration that the "border" actually extends 100 miles inland from the actual border. Half the population of the USA lives within this extended "border zone".

  4. 4th Amendment Applies At Border by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great! Now we need to apply it in the interior of the country.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  5. Re:It's still smart to look clean... by Dahamma · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why bother... Just encrypt it with a random long key that you can't easily memorize and mail the key printed on a piece of paper. Then you can tell them you don't have the password even if they wanted it. I kind of doubt they are going to open up every random letter that goes through the post office.

    Though it's all kind of a silly hypothetical. No one at the border wants your actual data anyway, they just want to harass you over not being given access to it.

  6. Re:I think it's great, but... by rujholla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because it is the right thing to do?

  7. Better summary of decision by Freddybear · · Score: 5, Informative

    Volokh has a somewhat more thorough summary of the decisions here:

    http://www.volokh.com/2013/03/08/interesting-ninth-circuit-en-banc-on-computer-searches-of-course-citing-orin/

            [A] border search of a computer is not transformed into an “extended border search” requiring particularized suspicion simply because the device is transported and examined beyond the border.... [T]he fact that the forensic examination occurred 170 miles away from the border did not heighten the interference with the defendant’s privacy, and the extended border search doctrine does not apply, in this case in which the defendant’s computer never cleared customs and the defendant never regained possession....

            [T]he forensic examination of the defendant’s computer required a showing of reasonable suspicion, a modest requirement in light of the Fourth Amendment.... [I]t is the comprehensive and intrusive nature of forensic examination — not the location of the examination — that is the key factor triggering the requirement of reasonable suspicion here.... [T]he uniquely sensitive nature of data on electronic devices, which often retain information far beyond the perceived point of erasure, carries with it a significant expectation of privacy and thus renders an exhaustive exploratory search more intrusive than with other forms of property....

            [In this case,] the border agents had reasonable suspicion to conduct an initial search at the border (which turned up no incriminating material) and the forensic examination. The en banc court wrote that the defendant’s Treasury Enforcement Communication System alert, prior child-related conviction, frequent travels, crossing from a country known for sex tourism, and collection of electronic equipment, plus the parameters of the Operation Angel Watch program aimed at combating child sex tourism, taken collectively, gave rise to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. ...

            [P]assword protection of files, which is ubiquitous among many law-abiding citizens, will not in isolation give rise to reasonable suspicion, but ... password protection may be considered in the totality of the circumstances where, as here, there are other indicia of criminal activity.... [T]he existence of password-protected files is also relevant to assessing the reasonableness of the scope and duration of the search of the defendant’s computer.... [T]he examination of the defendant’s electronic devices was supported by reasonable suspicion and that the scope and manner of the search were reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

  8. Re:It's still smart to look clean... by dbIII · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ah, but if the data on the SD card you mail consists of every even numbered byte, while the one you carry has every odd numbered byte...

    That sounds much better than putting it up your endian.

  9. Re:It's still smart to look clean... by Type44Q · · Score: 5, Funny

    Never underestimate the bandwidth of a dude with a belly full of micro sd cards?

    How about "that's a shitload of storage?"

  10. Re:It's still smart to look clean... by davester666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't forget, Homeland security doesn't just claim the right to search like this at the borders, but even if you just happen to live and/or travel within 100 miles of the border, regardless of whether or not you have or plan to cross the border. And at all major transportation methods such as planes, buses and trains [both inter and intra-city], and at large public gatherings such as major sporting events like the Superbowl.

    I think if you combine all these area's together where Homeland Security believes the constitution doesn't cover you, there may be a few hundred square yards Wyoming which you still may have those rights.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!