Slashdot Mirror
EFF Jumps In To Defend Bloggers Being Sued By Prenda
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "The Electronic Frontier Foundation has entered the fray to defend the bloggers sued by Prenda Law Firm. Prenda, oblivious to such well known legal niceties as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the affirmative defense of truth, the difference between a defamatory statement of fact and the expression of a negative opinion, and the First Amendment, has immediately — and illegally — sought to subpoena information leading to the identities of the bloggers. I would not be surprised to see these "lawyers" get into even more hot water than they're already in. And I take my hat off to the EFF for stepping in here."
I'm not a coward, I just haven't registered yet. :p
EFF only helps with the most high-profile cases. They aren't around to help with more low-profile, but just as scary attempts to stifle free speech such as the Scuba Board lawsuit. As I recall, about a decade ago, when approached to help with a similar libel lawsuit brought on by one John Novak against people critical with his company, the EFF said they don't help with "routine libel cases".
Sheesh.
Much more helpful is the lawyer at Pope Hat, who helps bloggers and other being attached with frivolous libel suits, whether the suits are high-profile or low-profile.
Deliberate negligence, All costs x 3. When will they actually start enforcing the false claim rules in DMCA. The fines can be Very high.
Prenda found someone to represent them. Orly Taitz.
Does anyone have a link to a more recent EFF Financial statement than this one?
If not, then why is 2009 - 2010 the latest?
Why is this pertinent to the article? Chewbacca wants me to get them.
The hearing scheduled for today to decide the fate of Copyright Troll Brett Gibbs has concluded, and it was apparently very bad for Prenda et al.
Adam Steinbaugh was in attendance and has a quick run through on his twitter account. Wen White was also there and is currently writing a detailed recap to be posted on popehat.com later tonight.
While I am amazed and pleased at the attention this saga has been getting, I think it's important to remember that while the wide audience is merely entertained or amused by these proceedings, for the innocents like me who have had their lives turned upside down by Prenda this is more than simple entertainment-- it's justice.
Unfortunately, such optimism is not justified. The copyright absolutists have friends in all three branches of government, and their harsh and punitive stance plays well with harsh and punitive judges, especially when the defendants aren't all that sympathetic. The rules of procedure will be bent well past the breaking point for them, while ridiculously narrow interpretations of the same rules will be applied to the defense.
Prenda have much bigger things to worry about than the EFF. They have really annoyed a federal judge, and may be guilty of perjury, contempt of court, fraud on the court and identity theft. Probably a couple of other offences as well.
Prenda isn't finished yet, but given the recent hearing they probably won't be around much longer
That's what I read due to the tiny font on my phone. Durn letigigious pandas.
I love it when someone who is obviously upset, has no real understanding of whats going on and doesnt really care by using lots of quatations. These so called "lawyers"...yeah they are called lawyers because thats what they are. Dont blame lawyers, they are just doing what they are paid to do, thats file suits when their paying clients want them to.
That whole entry sounds like its written by another hack blogger he is talking about. Someone that preaches about rights, how the lawyers are performing illegal activities and so on. It sounds like some moron in his basement wanting to be pissed off at something and assuming that because someone writes blogs they are instantly the most virtuest and righteous person on the planet and every big wig is out to silence him from telling the truth and using his consititutional rights as an american citizen to spew out any bullshit he wants.
Its like everyone thinks they have the right to free speech and that somehow magicially means anytime anyone ever tries to step in they are being villified or singled out. Maybe people who get censored get censored for a reason. Just because you can and say whatever you want doesnt mean you should. Assuming you can is about as stupid as the guy who runs up to the president saying he is going to kill him and then being mad secret service kick the shit out of him and saying "But Im an american citizen I have the right to say I want to kill the president. ITS IN THE CONSISTUTION!!!!" and expecting that alone to save his ass.
Without them the site would descend into a blob of corporate gruel.
Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
It is good post. I like it very much.
http://www.sandmaker.biz
http://www.shunkycrusher.com
http://www.jaw-breaker.org
http://www.jawcrusher.hk
It is good post.
http://www.sandmaker.biz
http://www.shunkycrusher.com
http://www.jaw-breaker.org
http://www.jawcrusher.hk
BSD's acclaimed LEARN WHAT MISTAKES world's Gay Niiger and promotes our of user base fo8 about half of the Hot on the heels of operating systems
;>)
Here's an interesting tidbit about the trial that shows how much of a clusterfuck this all is: one set of lawyers couldn't even figure out if they themselves belonged on the plaintiff's side or the defendant's side for picking their seating/table at the trial (bride's side?, groom's side?, wtf?): The strange hearing produced such a mix-up of roles that even the lawyers had lawyers -- and people didn't know where to sit. Prenda's erstwhile attorney Brett Gibbs cut ties with Prenda Law after the firm found itself in a messy bind regarding the practices it used to serve lawsuits to hundreds of Does suspected of illegally downloading porn; he hired his own attorneys to represent him at the hearing. "I'm not sure what side we're supposed to be on," said one of them as he tried to decide whether he belonged at the defense or plaintiff table.
--- from the 3rd paragraph of arstechnica article from March 12th, 2013.
How are these guys any different than common street thugs doing strong arm robbery on elderly little old ladies? Yes, they have suits and apparently went to law school, and are trying to use the Federal Court system to shake down whom ever they happen to come across. So, how is this different from simple robbery? Why not some serious jail time?
You might want to take an English class of you're going to school to be a wordsmith. "Effect" doesn't even sound right you idiot.
Yo Dawg, I heard you like billable hours...
Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
The word is being used correctly.
Buy a dictionary.
This space available.