Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Government Suspected of Unleashing Astroturfers Against Apple

An anonymous reader writes "A piece attacking Apple's treatment of Chinese consumers that aired on official government TV last week was followed by a wave of anti-Apple posts on Weibo (China's equivalent of Twitter) by Chinese celebrities. On the China-watching site Tea Leaf Nation, Liz Carter reports that sharp-eyed Weibo users noticed something funny about one such post from an actor and singer named Peter Ho: 'Cannot believe Apple is playing so many dirty tricks in customer service. As an Apple fan, I feel hurt...Need to post around 8:20 pm.' What was this 'need to post at 8:20 pm' business? After Weibo lit up with sarcastic tags such as #PostAround820, Ho claimed (rather unconvincingly) that someone must have hacked his account and posted the anti-Apple 'Weibo'. Mike Elgan at CultOfMac notes a parallel with the Chinese government's rough handling of Google in 2009, which led to Google's closing of its mainland operations. Google claimed that government commissioned hackers had apparently stolen search engine source code, Gmail messages and other user data. An earlier article by Elgan on Datamation notes the uneasy business relationship between Apple and China."

194 comments

  1. Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A lot of Chinese companies are real s**ts, and a lot of Chinese companies make their own Android handsets.

    IMHO, follow the money. It will be paid for troll turf from one of the China handset makers.

    Also why do you think the Chinese government is some sort of magic all seeing, all acting entity? Realistically they want to project that image, but part of the reason China is such a wild west is because the Chinese government is so corrupt and no-seeing.

    That's why companies like this don't fear smear tactics. Because they can always pay a bribe and walk away.

    1. Re:Why government? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also why do you think the Chinese government is some sort of magic all seeing, all acting entity?

      There is a perception that the Chinese government is a monolithic entity, with unity of purpose. This is not at all the case. Because the communist party has a monopoly on political power, everyone with ambition has to be in it. So the CCP includes people of every ideological hue, from hardcore Marxists to free market libertarians. These people often work in the same departments. Many Chinese government agencies are run by committee, rather than having a single person in charge, which results in muddled policies as factions maneuver to obstruct each other.

      I spent several years working in Shanghai, and found that the same is true in most Chinese businesses. The amount of office politics, infighting and backstabbing is probably an order of magnitude worse than anything I have experienced in the US.

    2. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      A lot of Chinese companies are real s**ts, and a lot of Chinese companies make their own Android handsets.

      Apple knockoffs coming out soon, that's why: The SlantediPhone.

    3. Re:Why government? by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Informative

      What, you think their Western counterparts are better?

      Reality is, these Chinese companies are learning FROM Western companies. And they're just starting, I'm fully expecting them to go full Bhopal on us eventually.

      And you know what? For what we did to them for last couple of centuries, it would hard as hell to argue that they're somehow worse then us and not appear both stupid and hypocritical at the same time.

    4. Re:Why government? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What we did to them? While I fully believe the US is culpable for the woes of many places in the world I think the greatest enemy of the Chinese is the Chinese. The US didn't support Mao and the US was not complicit in the building of a police state in China.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    5. Re:Why government? by mc6809e · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is a perception that the Chinese government is a monolithic entity, with unity of purpose. This is not at all the case. Because the communist party has a monopoly on political power, everyone with ambition has to be in it. So the CCP includes people of every ideological hue, from hardcore Marxists to free market libertarians.

      Yeah, but the one thing they all have in common is nationalism, racism, and xenophobia.

      Don't think for a second that if you're just nice to them they'll treat you fairly. They only see it as a weakness to exploit.

      The only exception might be the people of Hong Kong, a great city, but even there most have benevolent feelings of superiority.

    6. Re:Why government? by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IMHO, follow the money.

      I'd say it's even simpler than that. A classic method of deflecting criticism is to set up an external boogeyman. People are starting to demand employment rights from the government. The government could change, or they could set up some big, bad, foreign companies to take the rap.

      The only surprise is that they didn't choose a Japanese corporation. Oh, wait, they did...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:Why government? by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wasn't talking about US. It's quite interesting that you inferred that particular country from the thread talking about companies.

      Western companies have long since evolved to be "multinational" to avoid being too vulnerable to influence of any single country.

    8. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      China has more reason to bear a grudge against European countries, who were there raping China long before the US (regrettably) joined in. The US at the very least used part of its Boxer Rebellion indemnity to establish Tsinghua University, and later aided the country against Japanese expansion through lend lease and volunteer fighters, and yet again after the Sino-Soviet split, oh and once more with Most Favored Trading Nation.

      What has Europe done to pay for its transgressions against China?

    9. Re:Why government? by icebike · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of Chinese companies are real s**ts, and a lot of Chinese companies make their own Android handsets.

      IMHO, follow the money. It will be paid for troll turf from one of the China handset makers.

      Also why do you think the Chinese government is some sort of magic all seeing, all acting entity? Realistically they want to project that image, but part of the reason China is such a wild west is because the Chinese government is so corrupt and no-seeing.

      That's why companies like this don't fear smear tactics. Because they can always pay a bribe and walk away.

      If you ask me its it's no different than the fawning western press suddenly showing up with Apple articles when any other phone manufacturers release new phones. With nothing new on the table or in the product pipeline, you can count on at least a half dozen stories showing up in newspapers, websites, and blogs when ever Apple feels a little bit left out or needs some good news to counter some new product push from some random Android manufacturer.

      Convince me these don't start with a phonecall from apple headquarters, or an email marked confidential, listing story "ideas" and a "must be published by" date.

      If anything this is probably the Chinese government or some manufacturer taking a card out of Apple's playbook and doing it poorly.

      What goes around, comes around.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:Why government? by longk · · Score: 1

      If you go that far back in history, most Americans just came from Europe. From that point of view there's really no difference.

    11. Re:Why government? by longk · · Score: 2

      There's one important difference though: western media participates in these games because it makes them money, gets them contracts, etc. These Chinese celebrities are more likely to be strong-armed into cooperating than rewarded with a handsome sum of money.

    12. Re:Why government? by Luckyo · · Score: 0

      About as much as it has done to pay for its transgressions world wide. And mind you, US is very much on that list, because transgressions are basically about "people of European origin during colonialist period" rather then any given state. US in fact was arguably the last to stop, or at least "hide" its active colonialism, as European powers collapsed after WW2, having to cede control over most of their colonies as well as ability to project power necessary for active colonialism.

      Nowadays colonialism isn't a state affair as much as corporate affair, and corporations are mostly "multinationals" as to empower them to not be bound by control of any single nation. Notably this particular form of colonialism has in fact evolved from US, as Old World colonialism traditionally had a far more centralized and controlled form.

      Regardless, we're talking about companies, which are the modern face of colonialism rather then the old state-based colonialism. Hence the Bhopal reference.

    13. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Excuse the lack of Sinophobic content but in what way does "Need to post around 8:20 pm" translate to "Chinese government"?
      It mentioned Peter Ho is a spokesperson for Samsung Galaxy. I would actually think Samsung if I were into astrology, Ouiji boards, and late night radio.

    14. Re:Why government? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Western companies have long since evolved to be "multinational" to expand their markets.

      FTFY.

    15. Re:Why government? by fredprado · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A company does not need to be multinational to be in the global market. Being multinational gives you some advantages in this but it is not necessary by any means.

      On the other hand, the real motive to go multinational is being able to evade taxes, use cheaper labor, and evade inconvenient laws.

    16. Re:Why government? by fredprado · · Score: 1

      And how exactly do you know that?

    17. Re:Why government? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Why government?

      Because people have been indoctrinated, for the last 33 years that "government is the problem".

      And obviously 8:20 was a typo

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    18. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because praising/bashing Apple every time something Apple related happens gets news sites hits. Hits = profit.

      Why do you think Slashdot has a section dedicated to Apple?

    19. Re:Why government? by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is no limit to the paranoia of Fandroids.

    20. Re:Why government? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > What has Europe done to pay for its transgressions against China?

      The generations that transgressed died off. The current generation has done nothing to them and should not be held to blame for the actions of old dead people to whom they happen to be related.

      I know it's a cultural thing in some places to hold generations-long grudges against people for the "sins of their fathers". But I've never understood it. And I'll never accept it. And if that's one area where I'm just culturally-insensitive, that's one insensitivity I can live with.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    21. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      I would hope your knowledge of Chinese History doesn't go only as far back as Mao being in power. The west has in its past done some pretty atrocious things in China.

    22. Re:Why government? by pianophile · · Score: 1

      I know it's a cultural thing in some places to hold generations-long grudges against people for the "sins of their fathers". But I've never understood it. And I'll never accept it. And if that's one area where I'm just culturally-insensitive, that's one insensitivity I can live with.

      Hear, hear. I agree 100%, and wish I had mod points.

      --

      'Your brain is God.' -- Dr. Timothy Leary
    23. Re:Why government? by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There was no need to infer. You specifically referred to Bhopal, which was the Indian subsidiary of a U.S. company.

      Also, I disagree with your assertion that the Chinese are simply parroting what they learned from the West. I'm Asian, and the widespread Confucian ideals mean that it's very common for Asians to prioritize the group (be it family, company, or country) over the individual. What you see going on in Chinese companies is what happens when you take the Western concept of capitalism, and remove the West's strong sense of protecting individual liberties. Heck, the Chinese government's entire premise driving their rapid industrialization in the last 20 years is that by sacrificing protections for individual laborers, they can keep wages and costs artificially low, which will attract more foreign business and investments, thus allowing the country to modernize more quickly. That is, the needs of the country in the future mean the needs of the individuals today can be overlooked.

    24. Re:Why government? by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      If you go that far back in history, most Americans just came from Europe. From that point of view there's really no difference.

      We all look the same to you. Got it.

    25. Re:Why government? by hackingbear · · Score: 2

      The US didn't support Mao and the US was not complicit in the building of a police state in China.

      What about:

      • The US didn't help the ROC to fight off the communists after WWII, causing the eventual change of power on the mainland
      • After China had successfully developed nuclear bombs, the US didn't defend ROC's membership in the UN Security Council but miserably missing during a key vote that turned the key membership to the PRC.
      • A few years later, a US Secretary of States and a President visited Mao during Cultural Revolution, period with a million times worse human rights violation, to ally them to fight for the Soviet
      • For the same reason of fighting its cold war, the US opened its market to China

      No doubt that North Korea is now learning from US-China relations. And we can predict NK will be an US ally against China in a decade. When it comes to foreign politics, no country was / is clean.

    26. Re:Why government? by aurispector · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a US citizen, you are of course alluding to the American blood spilled in china during WW2 helping to fight the japanese invaders?

      Besides, little things like representative democracy matter in the long run. China is a dictatorship and their history is no excuse for totalitarianism or aggressive behavior above and beyond normal competitiveness in the world of business. Illegal activity in western nations generally gets exposed by the press and corrected.

        In China it's state sanctioned. They're thieves actively stealing anything they can, particularly intellectual property. All one needs to do is look at the company they keep internationally: North Korea, Iran, Russia, Syria, Cuba. Venezuela - all countries with a strong bias toward dictatorship.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    27. Re:Why government? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      Not at all. It goes back to the Tuesday before Mao being in power.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    28. Re:Why government? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      Nonsense. Corporations that are not multinational will have a very difficult time competing against locals outside their base markets.

      Without the actual presence in a market you cannot really grasp what products will be attractive.

      It is EXACTLY this reason that US companies failed for so long getting accepted in Japan.

      The idea that it has anything to do with taxes or legal issues is not at all true except perhaps in the financial industry.

    29. Re:Why government? by fredprado · · Score: 1

      Even if your logic made sense (which it does not) what exactly profit has to do with celebrity coercion? It is more likely that they are talking against Apple because they believe in what they are saying or, even more likely, are being paid to do it by Chinese companies, in the very same way American celebrities are paid by American companies to endorse their products and compare it favorably to others, even slandering the competition as long as they can get away with it.

    30. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're in the wrong website. Here we love Freedom, Democracy, Capitalism & The West (they're all interchangeable after all)

    31. Re:Why government? by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      If you further back in history, we all came from monkeys. So really, what's the difference?

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    32. Re:Why government? by bryan1945 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously. "Fawning media over Apple?" I must live in an alternate US.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    33. Re:Why government? by the_B0fh · · Score: 2

      Uh, if you follow the money, Peter Ho is a paid spokesperson for Samsung...

    34. Re:Why government? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The US was not a part of the UK during any part of the 19th century, though the Brits did manage to burn DC two decades prior to the first Opium War.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    35. Re:Why government? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      China is a hell of a lot less scary today than the USSR was.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    36. Re:Why government? by fredprado · · Score: 1

      Not true. Most companies are not multinational and manage very well to compete in foreigner markets with considerably smaller costs by taking local partners, local distributers, etc.

      Despite of anything your ignorance may tell you, the main reason to be multinational is to avoid restrictive laws, especially labor laws, and to evade taxes. Everything else are just excuses.

    37. Re:Why government? by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Grudges can be held for a couple of hundred years - see the hundred year war (which did not last for a hundred years, I know, I know).

      But once it gets past a couple of hundred thousand years, those eventually go away.

      Hope that helps. But feel free to come back in 200,000 years and tell me I'm wrong...

    38. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not entirely accurate. Maybe true for most industries before the online shopping age. Not so true after it started.

      I've bought quite a lot of things online with no presence whatsoever in the country I'm living in. Take Apple for example, I used to live in one Asian country that did not have an Apple store, but I still bought an iPod online. Same goes for my NDS, GAP clothes, camping tools, etc. I would think the total revenue these businesses get from all Asian countries where they don't have an actual presence is more than any one single Asian country they have and would probably hold true if you project that globally.

    39. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also happening where there are graduates working in UK universities or companies. They just seem to want to sabotage the competition or take another person's job - even if they are assigned to another task, they'll want to pair program on the other tasks.

    40. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What racist tripe, I cannot believe you would post with your real handle. Is this mindset really accepted where you come from?

      From a certain point of view, all Asians came from the same place and should all be distrusted equally too. I mean look at what Japan did in WW2 or look at what Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge were able to accomplish.

    41. Re:Why government? by sessamoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Uh, if you follow the money, Peter Ho is a paid spokesperson for Samsung...

      I'm amazed that this very important fact hasn't been mentioned or discussed at all in the comments except by the parent post. Follow the money trail? It probably ends at Samsung, a company that spends more on marketing and advertising than Apple by around a factor of 10.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    42. Re:Why government? by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      1. You're buying corporate bullshit as the real thing. That makes you the very definition of "stupid".
      2. Vast majority of companies that manage to agree on significant tax breaks, legislation and so on in their home country do not go multinational. Even if they have to sell on a lot of markets. Good example of this is Nokia which sold pretty much world wide very successfully except for US/Canada/Japan, while never going multinational.
      Multinationals usually need to dodge relevant legislation or other rules. Good example of this is petrochemical industry that tends to pollute to the extreme. As a result it needs to avoid being held responsible as much as possible.
      3. On a final note a lot of US and EU-based companies were and are very successful in even in extremely closed and xenophobic country of Japan. They do this because they don't sell to consumers but B2B.

    43. Re:Why government? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow, you don't normally see that kind of overt racism unless you are at war. My girlfriend happens to be Chinese (doesn't speak English, lives in Japan) and neither she nor any of her friends I have met/spoken to online are like that.

      I thought we were long past Ming the Merciless style stereotypes and bigotry, but I guess not.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    44. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree entirely, I just wish more educated Western people knew about the burning and looting of the Old Summer Palace, "one of the greatest acts of vandalism in history" as described by anthropologist Marshall Sahilins. It was a massive crime against their culture heritage in a country that has always valued it highly, done deliberately as an act of agression to punish the government. Instead, often the issue is danced around in articles like this one: http://harvardmagazine.com/2012/11/studying-the-stele.

      If during the Franco-Prussian War in 1871 the Germans had sacked Versailles and carted off its works of art to Berlin, you might imagine the French would still be mad about it. As would be appropriate.

    45. Re:Why government? by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      Nobody disputes that. And so it is justified? Just like we used to befriend Saddam Hussein for the same reason? We're not on moral high ground and our public and media wouldn't criticize their own country's actions much since it is unpatriotic and thus unwelcome. It is all rooted in selfishness and double standards.

    46. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be Samsung or any company with an axe to grind over Apple.

      It could also be influenced by the fact Apple has been making noises about better pay and working conditions for workers in factories that assemble Apple product.

      Anyone want to guess how many politically-connected Chinese manufacturing magnates want that idea to catch on?

    47. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you know what? For what we did to them for last couple of centuries, it would hard as hell to argue that they're somehow worse then us and not appear both stupid and hypocritical at the same time.

      Holy shit! You are woefully woefully so very woefully completely and utterly ignorant of China's history. Just wow. If they have been mistreated for a few centuries, it is barely repayment for the thousand plus years they have been dominating their own region and abusing their power. Just wow. They have barely suffered any karmic justice in comparison to what they have done.

      China could use a few more centuries of humility forced down their throats the hard way. Really. Read up on Chinese history and you may get a clue.

    48. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current generation has done nothing to them and should not be held to blame for the actions of old dead people to whom they happen to be related.

      The current generation which did not transgress is currently in their superior position due to their predecessors transgressions. The people who were victimized are dead but their heirs are in an inferior position due to the transgressions of the aforementioned group... and you fail to understand why their might be animosity? Hm. You might want to think about that some more.

    49. Re:Why government? by Unipuma · · Score: 0

      Strange, when I look back into the comments icebike, I find general comments on all kinds of articles, nothing Android or Apple specific.
      Going through your history however, I see almost half is about iOS and Android, and you do seem to have a somewhat strong bias towards iOS.

      I think you're confused about who the fanboy is here.

    50. Re:Why government? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Psychopaths generally 1% of the population (generally 15% of the prison population globally), now that's whole of them of varying intellects and capabilities and their ain't no country in the world that escapes their predations. No need to point at one countries people being worse or better than another countries people, more realistically just look at how solidly the psychopaths at the top have locked in their power and control and how great the resistance to their activity is in the rest of the population and in their system of justice. Global corruption scales seem to be a pretty solid measure of where psychopaths have the greatest dominance, the more corrupt the greater the influence of psychopaths and that is a straight across all races genetic defect nothing more and nothing less.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    51. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ho was one of many celebrities that posted 'reaction' tweets at the same time, apparently around 8:20 pm local time. The high profile of the participants, the timing and content suggest that the TV show and tweet response were coordinated, and not just by someone who was tipped that Apple's products would be criticized. The tweet organizers knew the specifics of what the TV show was going to say.

      It was the government, or perhaps more cautiously, certain elements of government.

    52. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with your assertion that the Chinese are simply parroting what they learned from the West. I'm Asian, and the widespread Confucian ideals mean that it's very common for Asians to prioritize the group (be it family, company, or country) over the individual.

      Whether Asians prioritize the group or the individual doesn't change the fact that they are copying. So instead of copying as individuals, they're copying as a (somewhat) unified group.

      But you're right that China isn't just parroting the West. China is assimilating. They learn from the West in order to improve up on it and one day surpass it.

      They will add your distinctiveness into their own. Freedom is irrelevant. Resistance is futile ;)

    53. Re:Why government? by Inda · · Score: 1

      Rory, chief technology editor (ha!) from the BBC is guilty of this.

      No one is immune.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    54. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange, when I look back into the comments icebike, I find general comments on all kinds of articles, nothing Android or Apple specific.

      It just shows that A) icebike is a general purpose troll (as well as an prolific Hateboy), and B) you don't know how to search.

    55. Re:Why government? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      My post wasn't meant to justify anything - I'm simply saying that the US will not befriend NK to undermine China, because China is not that scary. China of 2003 is not analogous to USSR of 1970.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    56. Re:Why government? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Not entirely sure how they have been "abusing" those who colonialized them. Unless you believe that if anyone did anything bad to someone else, anyone else is fully within their rights to have revenge.

      In which case, I'm pretty damn afraid of being a white male. Because there must be half a world of people wanting to take revenge on me.

    57. Re:Why government? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      A lot of Chinese companies are real s**ts, and a lot of Chinese companies make their own Android handsets.

      IMHO, follow the money. It will be paid for troll turf from one of the China handset makers.

      True, but a big part is companies like Apple making it unprofitable to manufacture in China anymore with their "supplier codes of conduct" and such.

      One thing I've learned about Chinese companies is they're extremely capitalistic - screwing people over is just par for the course (if they were smarter, they won't let themselves be screwed, so since they're dumb, it's increased profits). (This applies to anyone they think they can screw over - employees, customers, regardless of race or anything). Likewise, they're extremely cheap - that 10 year old PC that barely runs? Still good! Run our latest business critical software on it and quit telling it needs upgrading.

      So when Apple comes around on their high horse demanding fair wages and reasonable working conditions (not quite western style, but better than before), well, that increases the cost of business. And China's already seeing people move to Vietnam and other places because China's getting too expensive and the employees are becoming ungrateful at having jobs, now they're demanding benefits.

      So screw Apple, they want more Samsungs who'll poison a bunch of workers (they're stupid, and replacable, who cares?). so only a cheap $1000 fine.

      Also helps Apple is American, while Samsung etc. are well, Asian. Preference first for Chinese, but Asians are just as good.

    58. Re:Why government? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Seriously? I'm sorry, but get over it. If it didn't happen to you, your parents, or your grandparents: let it go.

    59. Re:Why government? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Ugh, let it go, or we'll be back pissed off cause monkey A bashed in monkey B's head with a rock.

    60. Re:Why government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You see that kind of crap all the time on Slashdot. It's usually just anti-American. ...those fat stupid warmongers.

    61. Re:Why government? by Aquillion · · Score: 1

      I once worked at a company here in the US that "requested" that all employees give its products high rated reviews on appropriate sites. There was an actual Google document with a schedule for when we would rate it so it wouldn't appear clumped together and suspicious. It wasn't mandatory, so thankfully I didn't have to participate, but it was pushed pretty hard.

  2. Transnationals do the same thing by jnmontario · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Frankly, nothing China does surprises me anymore. Rather, I think the surprising thing is that people don't want to accept massive manipulation of product presence online by transnationals and major corporations that do exactly what China is being accused of here.

    1. Re:Transnationals do the same thing by Nerdfest · · Score: 2

      Yep. Sony has been doing it forever, and Microsoft seems to have become a big fan of it lately as well. FaceBook was actually caught doing it against Google.

    2. Re:Transnationals do the same thing by jhoegl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The difference is the manipulation is Corp vs Corp, with traces and links to sub corps or hired PR firms. Where in China... anyone with seemingly no links or reason will start crap.
      Wait a minute... Is China the most epic troll Country in the world?

    3. Re:Transnationals do the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The only difference between China and the US is that the revolving door is on a different part of the horizon. The end result is the same.

  3. China should love Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    China and Apple have the same mentality:

    We know what is best for you, and we will not give you any choice about that.

    They're cut from the same mold.

    1. Re:China should love Apple! by Jeremi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      China and Apple have the same mentality:

      We know what is best for you, and we will not give you any choice about that.

      The difference being that Apple is often right -- and when it isn't, its users are free to switch over to the competition instead.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:China should love Apple! by dpidcoe · · Score: 2

      China and Apple have the same mentality:

      We know what is best for you, and we will not give you any choice about that.

      There can only be one!

    3. Re:China should love Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The OP and the moderators are astroturfing. They are, at best, anti-fanboys who can't think critically.

      I can buy any product I want. There are Apple products I don't want so I don't buy them. There are others I have purchased. Apple can have whatever attitude they want to have. If I don't like something they offer as a result of that attitude, I can walk away at any time.

      People who live in China don't have a choice, period. And the consequences of not going along can be dire.

      To say that Apple and China are from the same mold is not only ridiculous, but so offensive to oppressed Chinese that the moderators who modded that crap up should be blacklisted from mod points for life.

    4. Re:China should love Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is not a brand. The Chinese leadership makes political decisions, and are technically empowered by the Chinese.

      Apple is a brand. Apple leadership makes decisions based on what is good for their business. Apple is a publically owned and traded incorporation. Apple is empowered by the fruits of their business successes, or profit, and ultimately, their customers. Apple first and foremost gives you a choice: you can buy our product, or not. As far as I know, Apple has never executed dissidents nor has any authority to do so.

    5. Re:China should love Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China and Apple have the same mentality:

      We know what is best for you, and we will not give you any choice about that.

      The difference being that Apple is often right -- and when it isn't, its users are free to switch over to the competition instead.

      But, per your comparison, "free to switch over to the competition" means moving to another country, and that is still possble in China, no? North Korea, on the other hand...

    6. Re:China should love Apple! by DavidinAla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is one of the most idiotic comments ever posted here, but some people hate Apple so much that it's currently modded as "insightful." To compare Apple to a totalitarian government isn't just ignorant, but it's offensive, not offensive to Apple or its customers, but to the millions and millions of people around the world who truly DON'T have a choice. If you don't like what Apple sells, you simply don't buy the product. If you want something other than what they Chinese government allows you to have, you can be put into prison or killed for asking for it. In a market economy, you have choices. Whatever Apple makes in a category is a choice. You have others. If you truly think you have no choice because Apple provides A DIFFERENT CHOICE THAN THE ONE YOU WANT, you're an idiot and a fool.

    7. Re:China should love Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you don't like what Apple sells, you simply don't buy the product.

      Most of the people Apple markets to have no idea they are buying a censored, locked down device. Apple is creating the same kind of information lock-down that China is, on the backs of the less tech-informed population.

    8. Re:China should love Apple! by DavidinAla · · Score: 0

      You're a moron who's just unhappy that he can't convince everyone to make the same decisions that he does. People make choices. You're just irritated that more people don't agree with you — and that you can't force them to do what you prefer.

    9. Re:China should love Apple! by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Also just an AC. There is a reason the C stands for "coward." They can't bear to put their trolling next to their name. The AC tag has outlasted its usefulness on /.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    10. Re:China should love Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, OK. How many sockpuppets do you have? Thanks for proving once again the moderation system here is the worst ever created. Enjoy your "victory"!

    11. Re:China should love Apple! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Calm down dude. He was just pointing out the similar philosophy, nothing more.

      Fanboys over reacting is the primary reason why we can't have a good debate about this stuff.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:China should love Apple! by DavidinAla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you think that a government that kills and imprisons people for wanting to choose something different is a "similar philosophy" to a company which makes a product in a way that you wouldn't choose, you're as stupid as he is. That's the whole freaking point. It's not a "similar philosophy." One philosophy is, "You will do what we tell you." The other is, "Here's what we think is the best product possible; we want you to choose to buy it."

    13. Re:China should love Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you take yourself too seriously. Really.

      The comparison was between a totalitarian government and Apple was completely apt. Both attempt to exert rigid control over your actions and your thoughts. Sure, one can kill you and the other can not but that is why it is a similarity and not a fucking equality.

      Relax bud. Life is not supposed to be so stressful even if you are going to die. Oh, and stop drinking the Apple kool-aid so hard. All things in moderation, including moderation itself. ;)

    14. Re:China should love Apple! by Wovel · · Score: 1

      This seems like an important case of an AC calling an AC an AC. We need to study this further. We should also investigate what a sock puppet is in the context of a series of anonymous posts.

  4. Foxconn by udachny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple production facilities are in China already, aren't they? Foxconn if I am not mistaken? If Chinese GOVERNMENT wanted to hurt Apple, they'd start there.

    This is not government by itself, this is some competitor using his ties to the government channels maybe?

    1. Re:Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the government went after the Apple-Foxconn relationship, it would be obvious that they want to hurt Apple, which would draw condemnation. They don't want that; they want a groundswell of "the little people" patriotically choosing to boycott Apple in order to hurt Apple. This is the entire purpose of Astroturfing -- altering public perception WITHOUT being obvious.

    2. Re:Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To promote Chinese-only businesses? To make Foxconn switch to building for Chinese-only businesses? Apple's making a lot more money than Foxconn is.

    3. Re:Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you're arguing against yourself. You should know that Foxconn makes more than just iPhones. Remember how little labor adds to the cost of a phone? A successfully launched boycott of Apple would not hurt Foxconn as much as it would hurt Apple.

    4. Re:Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Additionally, a Chinese domestic boycott of Apple does not mean Foxconn stops making iPhones for export. Think on that for a moment. Apple loses market share in mainland China, closing off an avenue of capital outflow, but Foxconn/China still rides on the Apple profit train in the rest of the world. Good way to stave off future trade deficits. Maybe that's what the government is fearing.

    5. Re:Foxconn by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "If Chinese GOVERNMENT wanted to hurt Apple, they'd start there."

      It's government all right. And no, they most definitely would NOT start there.

      The Chinese government is a crowd of sneaky back-stabbers. They want our business, but they also want to steal all our secrets. So they leave the businesses (mainly) alone, at least to our faces. Then they hack and grab when they think we aren't looking.

      It's far past time we dropped China as a Most Favored Nation trading partner, and brought our manufacturing back home.

    6. Re:Foxconn by longk · · Score: 2

      There's government and then there's government. The same thing happens in the US and elsewhere.

      It's very possible that lower level government officials are pulling this off. Whether that's for their own misguided ideas or as a favor to a business friend doesn't really matter.

      Don't forget the CCP has over 80 million members. That's a lot of people pulling strings and effecting actions that aren't necessarily following guidelines of whatever you would see as the central government.

    7. Re:Foxconn by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "So unless you are talking about nationalization of successful international businesses, then your comment has no meaning."

      As far as I know, the U.S. government is the only entity that has declared "most favored trading partner", so of course I was referring to the U.S.

      "The only way it would make sense is if you suggested that US government should turn around and actually provide a business friendly environment inside the country"

      I disagree. Many companies are (with or without the U.S. government) ceasing their offshore outsourcing of manufacturing. It isn't as economical as it once appeared to be. And (although I doubt this is their primary motivation) offshoring has also been shown to be damaging to our economy.

      No, of course I wasn't suggesting "nationalizing" any businesses.

    8. Re:Foxconn by ikaruga · · Score: 1

      If the Chinese government directly or indirectly intervenes with Apple production lines in China, sure they can damage Apple. But that would also scare the crap out of pretty much every other foreign company which will probably resulting in them moving away from China. Without foreign business, China economy crumble. Such a move will be suicide for China. If the Chinese want to disrupt Apple(or any other major company) business, they must be as subtle as possible.

    9. Re:Foxconn by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      No offense but fuck off. I did not buy a Chinese made computer, and I do not use a Chinese made smart phone.

      If you want to say U.S. consumers in general have been part of the problem, I agree. But you should be careful about making claims about people you don't know.

    10. Re:Foxconn by gtall · · Score: 1

      Given a bit more time, machines will make China's population irrelevant to producing widgets. When that happens, it will be cheaper for U.S. manufacturers to produce in the U.S. It won't necessarily increase employment by a big whack in the U.S., but it will make securing designs and company secrets easier and also make manufacturing more flexible.

    11. Re:Foxconn by udachny · · Score: 0

      Yes, China is USA's "most favored trading partner", because what it actually means is that China is willing to subsidize USA consumption by providing vendor financing. So the Chinese work in the factories that produce various products and ship them outside of China and in return the foreigners ship in USD or Euro or whatever, and Chinese government takes these currencies off the hands of the exporters and to do it, Chinese monetary authority prints renminbi. So this is direct inflation in China, which immediately results in higher commodity prices and various asset class bubbles (housing as an example). This hurts the Chinese economy by not allowing the Chines laborers to get the productivity growth that they actually achieved, all of their productivity is being used to subsidize foreign consumption.

      Actually it is China that would gain tremendously if the Chinese government allowed renminbi to float, because all of a sudden all of these foreign economies would not be able to afford Chinese made products. To USA for example this spells disaster in the short run. The 500 Billion / year trade deficit means that USA would have to go without all of those products. I am saying 'in the short run', as in for a few years, until USA manages to rebuild some of its production capacity (and it won't be easy). But for example look at the seafood products, 90% of it is imported into USA from Asia. You think it's easy to restart the process, once you have no equipment, no industrial processes, no supply chain even to manage the catch? No, that would take real austerity, as in huge cuts to government, enormous cuts, huge reduction in taxes and in social welfare state payouts. The private industry would have to save a lot of money before it could restart production in USA. In the long run that is the correct thing to do, but in the short while it would spell enormous shift in the economy, away from service and government and away from the financial sectors, back to the manufacturing, back to agriculture, mining, shipping, all that stuff that USA decided it was above as it lived on inflation and borrowing.

      But I can easily see another possible situation, as the things get really bad in USA the government would declare some form of 'emergency' and one thing we know about government declared 'emergencies', they are really good to hold power (Egypt, Libya come to mind). In an emergency a government can easily declare a huge tax increase and straight out nationalization of resources and companies, but in case of Apple, GE and such, they are well positioned to escape such calamity, as they have huge reserves outside of USA.

      Who would really suffer would be the middle class and the poorest of people in that situation, they probably wouldn't even be allowed to leave the country (unless they pay out their portion of the national and unfunded debt for example). Already the USA government made it harder to just drop citizenship by increasing the form fee from 0 to 400USD and what's to stop it from raising that number to any arbitrary amount? IRS can take away people's passports or prevent them from getting passports if they owe 20K or more in back taxes (so you can't even go for a vacation or on a business trip if IRS says you owe taxes).

      That fence on the border... you think it's a good policy to 'bring manufacturing home', yes it is, but the way it just may happen is by closing that fence and not letting you out and forcing you into labor camps of some sort. Remember, everybody in USSR had a job....

    12. Re:Foxconn by udachny · · Score: 0

      My point is that there is no reason for the Chinese to attempt and damage Apple at all, it's an international label that produces in China and sells all over the world, including China. Apple's business in China brings money to China. If this is a government related activity at all, this has to be someone trying to use government for his own private gain in order to sell his own product, but I don't think it's an overall Chinese government strategy to attempt and hurt Apple as a business.

    13. Re:Foxconn by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Plenty of cheap labour outside of Asia.

      If on-shoring isn't feasible, perhaps US companies could look to their own region. e.g. stimulating a tech sector in central america.

    14. Re:Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense but I rather fuck you.
      You can't go and claim to be holier than thou and not provide proof.
      List your hardware otherwise lying hypocrite like yourself is the problem.

    15. Re:Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what magical devices are you using that were not manufactured in large part in guangzhou or taiwan?

    16. Re:Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i suppose its entirely possible he really believes that his dell computer was 'made in the usa' and his nokia phone was 'made in finland'

    17. Re:Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sincerely interested in how to accquire a computer or mobile phone that was not made in china!

    18. Re:Foxconn by russotto · · Score: 2

      It's far past time we dropped China as a Most Favored Nation trading partner, and brought our manufacturing back home.

      Most Favored Nation status has not existed for about 15 years. The status is now called Normal Trade Relations, and there are only two countries (Cuba and North Korea) which do not have it.

    19. Re:Foxconn by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Most Favored Nation status has not existed for about 15 years."

      Well, I have read it in the news a lot more recently than 15 years ago, so maybe the news sources were behind the times.

      But regardless of labels, we have done China many economic favors (in terms of outsourcing, even if you ignore anything else), and in turn they have done pretty much as I stated: stabbed us in the back.

      As far as I am concerned, these days, any corporation offshoring their manufacturing just to save a buck is declaring themselves an enemy of the American economy, and therefore Americans in general.

    20. Re:Foxconn by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      No offense but I rather fuck you.
      You can't go and claim to be holier than thou and not provide proof.
      List your hardware otherwise lying hypocrite like yourself is the problem.

      Bullshit. Somebody (you?) made an accusation based on zero evidence. It is up to the person making the accusation to prove their accusations. I have no obligation to prove a damn thing, and I don't owe that person anything at all. Not even this reply.

    21. Re:Foxconn by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Post with an account and maybe someone would care. Grow some balls.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    22. Re:Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you are the one making an extaordinary claim. The burden of proof is on you.

    23. Re:Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woah, the 1905 AC was somebody else.
      JQP you are the one full of shit.
      It doesn't matter what anyone has accused you of doing.
      It is YOU who made the claim that you are NOT using Chinese gear.
      The accusation is merely speculative, you are the one who is defending with a supposed FACT (which you HAVE NOT backed up).
      Perhaps you should take a course in clear thinking before trying to defend your FUD.

    24. Re:Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got you to reply didn't it?
      No offense but you have a pretty meager qualification of "balls".

    25. Re:Foxconn by khb · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it is retribution for the previously announced Apple intent to 'in-shore' some manufacturing (on top of the already cited government industry competitor ties).

    26. Re:Foxconn by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "It doesn't matter what anyone has accused you of doing. It is YOU who made the claim that you are NOT using Chinese gear."

      Wrong.

      If you are going to participate in a debate, maybe you should go find a book on the rules of debate and look it the fuck up.

      "The accusation is merely speculative, you are the one who is defending with a supposed FACT (which you HAVE NOT backed up)."

      Wrong again. This was the accusation:

      "No offense but you're part of the problem...posting from your Chinese made computer, and talking on your Chinese made smartphone."

      It was a statement purporting to be fact ("You are..."). There was not the slightest thing "speculative" about it. So let's see something concrete to back it up. Otherwise this exchange is over.

    27. Re:Foxconn by Wovel · · Score: 1

      I can prove it. There are no smart-phones made in the United States. There are no personal computers where all of the components are made in the United States (A few are assembled here, but that is a game, all the real manufacturing is in Asia).

    28. Re:Foxconn by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "I can prove it. There are no smart-phones made in the United States. There are no personal computers where all of the components are made in the United States (A few are assembled here, but that is a game, all the real manufacturing is in Asia)."

      No, you can't. Because your "proof" is based on several invalid assumptions.

      First, who said I use a "smartphone"? I certainly did not state that anywhere on Slashdot. So do I, or don't I? You can guess all you like, but you have no "proof" either way. Or even evidence.

      Second, when was the computer manufactured, and WHERE did the parts come from? You don't know. The fact is that I used to be a computer technician (I am still A+ certified) and I have usually built my computers myself from parts I hand-pick.

      There are many electronics manufacturers around the world, and nowhere near all of them are in China (it may surprise you that many of them are even in the U.S.). This thread was about me buying a computer that was supposedly made in China, remember? I did nothing of the sort. While there may be a few Chinese components on the boards of the computer I last bought new, the majority of them are not, and the majority of it was neither designed or manufactured in China.

    29. Re:Foxconn by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "No, you are the one making an extaordinary claim. The burden of proof is on you."

      Bullshit. The claim is only "extraordinary" if you have made certain assumptions (which in fact you have). I am not responsible for your assumptions.

      ---
      "I am not retained by the police to supply their deficiencies." -- Sherlock Holmes

    30. Re:Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let's see something concrete to back it up. Otherwise this exchange is over

      Exactly bitch.

      Maybe you're just not used to sarcastic speech, or very good at reading between the lines, so let's spoon feed this for you:
      "hey Jane, you are the problem since you are probably using a Chinese made computer to post your bullshit"
      Still need mommy to clean the basement for you too?

      It is YOU who tried adding another layer of bullshit to cover your original bullshit, by staking a position that solidify your dilemma of not able to prove your crazy assertions.

      Try reading your own gobbledygook and it's pretty obvious that you're a pathological liar suffering from bouts of delusion when you haven't taken your medication on time.
      Seriously, losers like you is a problem in society.
      You might want to get some professional help if you got any balls (although calling yourself "Jane" doesn't give a warm and fuzzy about your mental stability).

      Of course I realize you cannot handle any of this higher discourse in your pea brain, but it is here once you get the help you need.

    31. Re:Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given a bit more time, machines will make China's population irrelevant to producing widgets. When that happens, it will be cheaper for U.S. manufacturers to produce in the U.S.

      By the time that happens, there will be no skilled jobs left -- if China's workforce becomes irrelevant, America's will already be non-existent.

      This, of course, is the natural conclusion of globalization.

      Nowadays, "Made in America" can mean "all but the final assembly (addition of the Made In America stickers) done elsewhere".

      To the republicunts, this is desirable, as long as taxes on the wealthy stay low.

  5. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...was followed by a wave of anti-Apple posts on Weibo (China's equivalent of Twitter) by Chinese celebrities

    Shouldn't that just be called Chatter?

    Anyway, I find it hard to believe anyone has to be paid to bash Apple. I do it for free! Should I have been getting paid all this time?

  6. Not necessarily astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've studied Chinese history extensively (even have my Bachelor's in it). While I would not put it past the Chinese government to do this, at the same time it's a complete and total fallacy to assume that a totalitarian government akin to the Chinese one can stay in power without the strong support of a sizable minority and the tacit support or disinterest of the majority of people. Generally my experience with the Chinese shows that there are 1-3 out of every ten that support the government's actions, which is typically enough to keep them in power as long as the remaining 7 are apathetic.

    Also, the Government is facing an existential crisis. They've built their legitimacy to rule on the idea that they could keep growing and prosper, and it worked as they built an export economy built on cheap labor. Now with the global economic downturn they've been unable to maintain the steady job growth, while at the same time many Chinese are prospering and looking for more than just a low paying factory job. They're trying to build a consumer economy but that shift takes time, so they've turned to nationalism instead to redirect any dissension in the populace outwards instead of inwards; see the whole Senkaku island spat between China and Japan. This is another example of it; they're turning their people ever so slightly against America to help unify them.

    1. Re:Not necessarily astroturfing by longk · · Score: 2

      1-3? Living in China for 7+ years now I can tell you that probably more than 90% of them support the government. Sure they'll bitch and moan about their leades, but if you ask them which system they would prefer (China, US or something European) they're sticking to the Chinese system.

      IMHO, this is no different from most western countries. We complain about our governments but very few of us would opt for the system of another country, even if that system is fairly similar to ours.

    2. Re:Not necessarily astroturfing by gtall · · Score: 1

      "This is another example of it; they're turning their people ever so slightly against America to help unify them." While that is true, I doubt it will be as effective as it has been in the past. My sense is that the internet causes tripwires for manipulation, people don't like being manipulated and when there are other sources of information that what is spewed from government, government spew tends to look dumb. The Chinese people, if what I read currently is correct, are already establishing a sort of underground language for talking about their government spew. They use words and phrases to mean things different than their dictionary definition. So while the Chinese spew-masters may think they are unifying the people, they may be unifying them in a way they never intended.

    3. Re:Not necessarily astroturfing by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
      This reminds me of the system for translating Pravda:

      Fraternal discussions - nobody got hurt
      Friendly discussions - we're still at the talking phase
      Frank and friendly discussions - we told you to stop doing that, now stop doing it.
      Frank discussions - the tanks are rolling.

      --
      From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    4. Re:Not necessarily astroturfing by seshomaru+samma · · Score: 1

      I'm also living here for a long time. Not sure if I get the same feeling, especially recently with the pigs in the river , pollution and all that. I think that many people support the government on international issues , like the dispute with Japan or Taiwan , but when it comes to domestic policies many see the government as completely useless. Perhaps a few years ago people were more hopeful , but now it seems that the corruption is impossible to heal

  7. Nothing to look at here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's move along. Post around 11:20 am.

  8. Re:Astroturfers against Apple? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

    My Macbook drowns kittens and beats up elderly ladies. Why would Apple be that evil? [need to post about 10:25AM]

  9. Reminds me of a story by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

    Back before e-mail, someone wrote a letter to the offices of some company, complaining about their product or service. A few days later, he received a nicely worded apologetic letter. Attached to the letter was the post-it note, written by the recipient in the company which read, "Send this son-of-a-bitch our standard apology form letter."

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  10. Re:another day, another anit-China article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Post around 11:38PM Shanghai time.

  11. Re:Astroturfers against Apple? by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's humor, son. It doesn't rise to the standard of "pathetic."

    Well, unless you miss the point...

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  12. I suspect everything and anyone of all things. by alan.warrick4291 · · Score: 1

    In other news polar bears are suspected of causing global warming. You heard it here first slashdot. In case some how it is proven 100's of years from now.

    1. Re:I suspect everything and anyone of all things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up douche nozzle.

  13. Sick of this 'got hacked' nonsense. by Gadget27 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has to be the third or fourth story I read in recent weeks where someone made a post or tweet that was either inappropriately worded, or outright incorrect for its purpose, as this one looks to be. In all these cases, the account owners shrug it off as their account being hacked, as if it's something so common it happens to all of us weekly, in order to cover their ass.
    It seems 'my account got hacked' is quickly becoming the 21st century 'my dog ate my homework' bullshit excuse. Let's just be sure not to forget the 'bullshit' part of that.

    1. Re:Sick of this 'got hacked' nonsense. by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      account owners shrug it off as their account being hacked, as if it's something so common it happens to all of us weekly

      From what I've read, in China it may well happen to people weekly. Talk about a festering hellhole of information insecurity... between the government hacking corps, the theft and physical bugging of laptops, the Great Firewall of China, and the industrial espionage and corruption, I'm surprised any computing gets done there at all. :^P

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Sick of this 'got hacked' nonsense. by icebike · · Score: 1

      Except that accounts DO get hacked on a massive scale and passwords are stolen by the millions.
      Read the news.

      What possible reason is there for stealing twitter accounts or Facebook accounts other than for mischief?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:Sick of this 'got hacked' nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guessing a password doesn't exactly qualify as hacking to me, but to each his own.

    4. Re:Sick of this 'got hacked' nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They throw people at the problem.

    5. Re:Sick of this 'got hacked' nonsense. by icebike · · Score: 1

      But breaking in, and stealing several hundred thousand account credentials counts as hacking by just about anyone's definition.
      Or don't you read the press?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    6. Re:Sick of this 'got hacked' nonsense. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      You don't break in and steal an account on a whim, and then post bad press on apple as your joke.
      If it was all script kiddies and fools, I'd expect more "my penis is tiny" posts.

    7. Re:Sick of this 'got hacked' nonsense. by icebike · · Score: 1

      You break in, steal half a million account credentials, and turn around and sell the list on the Internet to as many people as you can as quickly as you can.
      You don't want to put any more traffic on the site yourself once you score the account logins. Its easy to search for these lists for sale if you know where.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  14. Re:Astroturfers against Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well, we haven't yet seen the "From the Post-after-Samsung-Galaxy-S4-launch dept" tagline as a slipup yet, so not sure if it's astroturf or just a grudge.

  15. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    After all this negative hacking publicity and a precarious human rights situation, finally some good news from China ...

  16. Guy Kawasaki must be proud by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    The Chinese have been reading his book.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:Guy Kawasaki must be proud by longk · · Score: 1

      Which one?

  17. Suits Psyga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, we already know he's on Smart Brain's payroll...

  18. 50 Cent Brigade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Chinese Communist Party has a group of people (mostly off-duty journalists, students, and such) called the 50 Cent Brigade. They pay them the equivalent of 50 cents every time they post a comment online to sway public opinion in the direction of the Party. This group probably isn't involved with the celebrities posting stuff on Twtitter, but the intention would be the same. Keep in mind that "Perception Management" is a big thing for the Chinese Communist Party--it's why they keep the entire country's media on such a short leash, why the censor the Internet, and why they censor keywords on their permitted social media platforms.

  19. Re:Astroturfers against Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My niece was molested by an iPhone. True story.

  20. False flag. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple is responsible. The goal here is to get you to feel that apple is a victim.

    If this story did not benefit apple, would you even be reading it right now?

  21. we need to know what Apple did in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read the tweet on Weibo. I watched the TV show about Apple.
    I am just wondering if what the tweet and the TV show want to tell us is true.
    Seems none of you guys here think about it.

  22. Re:Blah by mc6809e · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is turning into a hypocritical pro-USA outlet with all this demonizing of China. I think the Chinese should stop beating around the bush and just kick all big American corporations out of their country. There is an inevitable cold war building up between the two anyway.

    The cold war began in 1949 when China went communist, despite receiving help from the USA during World War 2.

    They even sent Chinese to help the North Vietnamese kill Americans in Vietnam during the Vietnam war.

    Even so the USA reached out to China. Trade was increased. We allowed technology developed in the USA to make its way into China. We allowed China to access the internet and much of the information and knowledge the West has to offer. We've tried being friends.

    Still China stabs the USA in the back.

    Is it a mistake then to trust China?

  23. Re:Astroturfers against Apple? by davester666 · · Score: 2

    That's way better than mine.

    My MacBook drowns elderly ladies and beats up kittens. Probably because it's "Pro".

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  24. Re:Astroturfers against Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't count if someone is constantly texting her and she send pictures afterwards.

  25. Re:Blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You make USA out to be some benevolent deity, and even bring the Vietnam war up despite it being one of the greatest violations and shames of the USA. You must be completely indoctrinated. It seems you have plenty of schooling, maybe you should try some actual education?

  26. Re:Blah by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's fair to characterize direct US support of China during WWII as anything but pretty minimal and rather late.

    The US didn't enter the war until after Pearl Harbor, and supply routes were were pretty much controlled by Japan at that point. The only way materials could be gotten in was airlift over the 'hump' aka the Himalayas.

    Of course the USN working its way across the Pacific was a help in that it relieved pressure on China. But it was somewhat indirect.

  27. Storm in a tea cup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple made their bed, no one hgeld a gun to the corporations head (well except greed) and forced them, to outsource to China.

  28. Well of course... by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2

    They have no experience of another system of government and most people are conservative. It's just like Americans being fearful of "socialised" medicine - unless they've spent enough time in Europe to get to know another system.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  29. Re:Blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah! How dare the rest of the world decide things for themselves without so much as a by your leave!

  30. Another Astroturfer: by Hartree · · Score: 2

    It's obvious you're just a shill for the the American running dog government posting on behalf of their lackey, Apple. [need to post at 1:45 pm]

    1. Re:Another Astroturfer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if 50 cent brigade can bill accurately for Anonymous Coward posts. [need to post at 5:11 PM]

  31. Im confused by SuperCharlie · · Score: 1

    Who am I supposed to be rooting for here? If they dual to the death is it a win-win-win?

  32. Biting the hand that feeds them by Grayhand · · Score: 1

    It may seem like it but Apple doesn't need China. Even with the stock buy back and dividends Apple has over 110 billion in the bank. Building their own factories and moving back to the US or a friendlier country would slightly reduce their massive profits. The good will could actually increase sales enough to offset the costs if they moved back to the US. Unless they think of something to do with the money they will likely have in excess of 200 billion in the bank by 2020. They could easily finance 10 missions to Mars so moving back the the US would barely dent their war chest.

  33. You clearly have not been on CNN.com recently by gelfling · · Score: 0

    There is not a single word printed in their Tech tab that isn't clearly paid propaganda by someone, either for Apple or Samsung.

  34. Re:Astroturfers against Apple? by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 4, Funny

    The iPod Touch

  35. beginners by stenvar · · Score: 1

    So, the Chinese government is new to this. Companies and governments in the West are much better at recruiting each other and the people to do their propagandistic bidding for them.

  36. Re:Blah by stenvar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Slashdot is turning into a hypocritical pro-USA outlet

    Slashdot is, and has always been, a US site.

    with all this demonizing of China.

    You can't "demonize" a demon. China is still a corrupt communist dictatorship.

    I think the Chinese should stop beating around the bush and just kick all big American corporations out of their country.

    They tried isolationism for a few centuries and it didn't work: the West surpassed them technologically and economically and then kicked their butts. The Chinese leadership is corrupt and totalitarian, but it isn't stupid. They keep Western companies in China to steal their technology, and the West plays along because we get cheap consumer goods. It's probably a reasonable deal, since technology is as short lived as a Chinese-made Barbie doll.

  37. Re:Blah by mc6809e · · Score: 1

    You make USA out to be some benevolent deity, and even bring the Vietnam war up despite it being one of the greatest violations and shames of the USA. You must be completely indoctrinated. It seems you have plenty of schooling, maybe you should try some actual education?

    You must think schools in the USA work the same way they do in your homeland, comrade. There's plenty of anti-Americanism in education and many professional educators feel the same way you do about the USA and Vietnam. I heard plenty anti-Americanism growing up.

    But Communism has shown itself to be a ruthless, murderous ideology. It's terrible that the USA was unable to save the South Vietnamese from the Communist North.

    If anyone should be ashamed it's Chinese communists. Many Vietnamese would have been spared if not for Chinese efforts to impose communism on the country.

  38. Re:Blah by mc6809e · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's fair to characterize direct US support of China during WWII as anything but pretty minimal and rather late.

    That's because it was a volunteer force, and to me that makes it even more significant.

    No one forced these Americans to fight for the Chinese. Yet they did it anyway.

  39. Moving manufacturing to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chinese are just mad that Apple announced plans to move some manufacturing to the US.

  40. Re:Blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many Hondurans , South Amercians and Africans would have been spared if the USA hadnt tried to force their brand of Corporate imperialism err democracy on them

  41. March 15 is consumer day in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just a hypocritical pro-USA demonizing of China. March 15 is consumer day in China, apple service problem were one of the many got exposed by CCTV.

  42. Re:Blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corruption is EVERYWHERE, perhaps in the west its just a little more hidden. Case in point why are people upset with SOPA, wasnt it passed via a Democratic processes?

    its just too bad the British didn't have a SOPA law during the industrial revolution when the US was stealing technology left, right and center.

    "I did not tell half of what I saw, for I knew I would not be believed."
    — Marco Polo, on his death bed in 1324

  43. Re:Astroturfers against Apple? by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    Dang, I need a RAMmer upgrade.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  44. Re:Astroturfers against Apple? by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    I'm enjoying the pro-China astroturfing that is going on below.
    I really wish /. would get of the AC option. It's only used by trolls now, not its original purpose of protected people from releasing important information (a la WikiLeaks). Then again, /. is now just a place to argue about global warming, judicial cases, and OS wars.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  45. Is anybody in china listening. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does the media in china have any influence, I like to think I am always suspicions of media in the west, (I do get caught out occasionally), you would think people in china ,where its even easier for the media to be manipulated, would be even more sceptical of what they read. I suppose thats easy for me to say, as someone from out side of China.

  46. Re:Blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually they did, it's just that the US explicitly refused to acknowledge foreign patents and copyrights for several decades after declaring independence and encouraged its businessmen to engage in wholesale industrial espionage.

    Sound like any country you know today?

  47. Probably cheaper by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

    Why bother hiring expensive celebrity astroturfers when your hacker sweatshop can get the same result for 1/20th the cost?

    You get the occasional 'Need to post this by 8:20' slips, but hey, you get what you pay for.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  48. Re:Astroturfers against Apple? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2

    At least it's better than a Ballmer squirt.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  49. If somebody critisizes apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they must be on somebody's payroll

  50. And apple are real s**ts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So maybe a few out of hundreds are sockpuppets, this is absolutely normal on the internet. Just look at APK's ranting posts. And his socks marking them up.

  51. Overdue for tariff by Squidlips · · Score: 1

    Enough is enough. Time for a tariff on all the crap that China is dumping on us. It would solve the budge crisis and bring industry back to the US.

  52. Re:Blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It might say that in the FAQ, but the USA/Non-USA user split on Slashdot has been equal for years.

    The majority of +5 posts come from Non-USA people. That is easy to check yourself.

  53. Re:Blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US isn't corrupt? I live in MA, and it's practically a corrupt one-party dictatorship, just not communism. Spending more of your energy on creating some technology that cannot be so easily stolen by a country such as China or others might help this country more!!

  54. Re:another day, another anit-China article by coffee-breaks · · Score: 0

    Moron, I'm in LA you shill.