Slashdot Mirror


Google Launches 'Keep' To Rival Evernote

Today Google launched 'Google Keep', a mobile note-taking service to rival software like Evernote. It works on devices running Android 4.0 or later, and there's also a web interface (which is struggling under launch load as of this writing). Google describes the service thus: "With Keep you can quickly jot ideas down when you think of them and even include checklists and photos to keep track of what’s important to you. Your notes are safely stored in Google Drive and synced to all your devices so you can always have them at hand. If it’s more convenient to speak than to type that’s fine—Keep transcribes voice memos for you automatically. There’s super-fast search to find what you’re looking for and when you’re finished with a note you can archive or delete it." Fans of Google Reader will probably be a bit hesitant to pick this up.

50 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. Google Used to Innovate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember when Google used to innovate?

  2. screw google! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I will try very hard to never use new Google products. As they are a company that cannot be relied on to to support a product despite the number of people who become dependent on it. I have been already burnt by Google Notebook, and now Google Reader. They just decided to yank the product. Now they greedily crawl back in with Google Keep. You should not be keeping anything with Google if you really want to keep it for a long time. They are an untrustworthy company.

    1. Re:screw google! by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Make sure you ask for a refund.

    2. Re:screw google! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If a refund means Google has to delete everything they know about me and can no longer resell my data to anyone, then sign me up, now.

    3. Re:screw google! by TC+Wilcox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Make sure you ask for a refund.

      Asking for a refund would be totally relevant if he was their customer. He isn't... He is the product and when your users are your product getting your users mad really can have consequences.

    4. Re:screw google! by Proteus · · Score: 2

      Maybe some compensation for all that personal data and advertising revenue they got from his use of Gmail? It's not like Gmail is provided at no value to Google (same with Reader, actually).

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    5. Re:screw google! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you read the blurb, this is not really a "new" product, but rather an extension of Google Drive. If you use Google Drive, you already have the product.

      http://drive.google.com/keep

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    6. Re:screw google! by mark-t · · Score: 3, Funny

      If people are their product, then wouldn't that make Google guilty of human trafficking?

    7. Re: screw google! by Hellsbells · · Score: 2

      What does it matter if it is a paid service?

      Google has a history of dropping support for products suddenly, so why would anyone want to start using a product with a proven alternative, when its likely that in a year our two it will be suddenly dropped?

  3. Google Keep by pushing-robot · · Score: 2

    Fans of Google Reader will probably be a bit hesitant to pick this up.

    At least the headlines will be good.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:Google Keep by Nixoloco · · Score: 3, Informative

      It would be nice if Evernote's local database was in an open format - if it is, it's not obvious (there is an API, but I haven't investigated to see if there's a way to use it should the cloud side of the service go AWOL tomorrow). It's easy enough to export all of the notes into HTML, though, and doing that from time to time as a backup is probably a good idea.

      The Evernote client already has a feature to export all the data from the locally stored notebooks/databases to HTML or to an Evernote XML file (which isn't that hard to parse). This is independent of the cloud export features. It includes notes and attachments. If that isn't enough, it looks like the local database is really just some SQLite DB's, so it wouldn't be that hard to write something to pull the data out directly.

  4. Can't wait until next spring by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm pretty sure that's when this will get the axe.

    1. Re:Can't wait until next spring by stephanruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Can't wait until next spring. I'm pretty sure that's when this will get the axe.

      You're wrong. It already got the ax last summer (July 2012) when that service was called Google Notebook (or Google Notes). Google Notebook could already be shared between all your devices, and it wasn't just limited to the latest release of Android either.

      Why did you make this transition?

      We loved working on Notebook, but sometimes we have to make the hard decision to focus more of our efforts on products and technologies that will yield the most benefit to users in the long run. With all the great innovations and improvements to Google Docs in the last few years, we think it’s a great replacement for Notebook. http://www.google.com/googlenotebook/faq.html

      Personally, I just like PushBullet. It doesn't have all the functionality Google Notebook used to have, nor will it ever have half the functionality Keep will have (since it's really designed to push things to your devices, not really push things both ways). But I really like it. It's simple. It's elegant. And it just does the things I need it to do.

      And no, I don't know those PushBullet guys. I have no affiliation with them.

  5. Hard to trust by boshvark · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm pretty sure Evernote will not suddenly "retire" its service and leave users out to dry. Sorry, Google Keep. Even if you're everything I ever dreamed of, you've arrived at the wrong place and the wrong time.

    --
    There's always money in the banana stand.
    1. Re:Hard to trust by JanneM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't trust Evernote either. It is their main line of business so it's unlikely to be "spring cleaned". But they can certainly go bankupt or bought by a rival and lose the cervice altogether. Or they can move in a direction that makes future versions bad or unusable for me. When it's the cloud you can never stay with a previous version.

      Anything critical, you use an offline app. Use the net only for syncing, preferably through file sharing or other system-agnostic manner.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:Hard to trust by physicsphairy · · Score: 2

      Well, there probably is *some* extra security in that Evernote has less flexibility to migrate their engineers to other projects. However, that also means bad things if their app stops making money the most sensible thing may be to basically sellout their users (and potentially their data) to some other firm. They might be gobbled up by a larger company for other reasons and be taken in an unpleasant direction (see Sun->Oracle), or simply forced to declare bankruptcy, both of which are far less likely for Google. Basically, no matter who owns it, the software needs to be profitable to continue being supported, and there are some risks even if it is.

      I feel there is always some need to plan for the software you use being retired. Even if it's an open source project, if it's anything which involves integrating with other software/hardware, you are still going to have to abandon it if you continue updating your other software/hardware. (granted it is much easier for an OS project to find new maintainers)

      My principal question is if I can easily export my data, which google does tend to be pretty good about. Of course, I am still interested in how long I think it will be before I have to migrate, because migrating is annoying, but if it's a very compelling piece of software and I will be able to export my data from it, it's probably worth betting on the potential shelflife.

  6. Fool me once... by rgbscan · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been burned by too many "non-core" Google applications to even be bothered to try this. I mean, look up the old Google Notebook. Basically the same thing. If it ain't search, advertising, or social.... it's only a matter of time till you get scroogled. (Funny I thought that was the dumbest MS campaign ever....but it's starting to grow on me).

  7. Google Notebook by CremIon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anyone remember Google Notebook...?

  8. So...Google Keep... by CremIon · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...until it's Gone...?

    1. Re:So...Google Keep... by dclozier · · Score: 5, Funny

      At which point it will be renamed Google Kept.

  9. No by oGMo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You mean when they made a search engine? Or a webmail client? Or online maps? Or office apps? Or an RSS reader? Or a calendar? Or a finance site? Or a chat program? Or a photo site? Or an online store? Or a social site? Or a phone OS?

    None of these things are "innovations", none of them were particularly innovative, and they weren't doing any of them first (or even early), but in many cases they were better/easier/free-as-in-beer-er than the alternative. Which is fine. And they made money on it. Which is great. And when they stop working (like Reader), we'll find something else, or write something else. Since they make getting your data out pretty easy, that's not even hard.

    And if you've become complacent where if Google doesn't offer it, you can't find it, that's not innovation... that's you being lazy. And it's not their fault, it's yours.

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    1. Re:No by todrules · · Score: 2

      Google is great at taking an idea an improving.

      ... and then mohtballing it a couple of years later.

    2. Re:No by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      i read about 'glass' about 13 years ago in a short story in a scifi magazine. but it was way more advanced. it also created persistent overlays of the real world and communicated with other 'glasses'. e.g. if i told my 'glass' to put a watch on my wrist, others with 'glass' could see it on my wrist too. same for a virtual picture on a bedroom wall, etc.
      the story unfortunately isn't in english http://www.scifi.sk/poviedky/80/Juraj_Andrassy-Ruzove_okuliare.html

    3. Re:No by geekoid · · Score: 2

      You need a dictionary.
      Wikipedia:
      "Innovation is the development of new values through solutions that meet new requirements, inarticulate needs, or old customer and market needs in value adding new ways.
      This is accomplished through more effective products, processes, services, technologies, or ideas that are readily available to markets, governments, and society.
      Innovation differs from invention in that innovation refers to the use of a better and, as a result, novel idea or method, whereas invention refers more directly to the creation of the idea or method itself.
      Innovation differs from improvement in that innovation refers to the notion of doing something different rather than doing the same thing better."

      innovate
        Use Innovate in a sentence
      innovate [in-uh-veyt] Show IPA verb, innovated, innovating.
      verb (used without object)
      1.
      to introduce something new; make changes in anything established.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:No by geekoid · · Score: 2

      People need to stop being stupid and letting the egos run amok not letting them say 'oh, I was wrong. That wasn't the correct word.'

      Innovation is simply changing existing technology or adding value to existing technology.

      Google Glass is an invention. Yes, it's also innovative. An invention is always innovative, but innovation doesn't always mean invention.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:No by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      You mean when they made a search engine?

      Yes, when they made a search engine that worked so much better than the primitive search that everyone else was offering back then.

      By your argument, a car was not an innovation, since it's functionally just like a horse cart (except without a horse, and it goes faster, but that's not "particularly innovative").

    6. Re:No by JackieBrown · · Score: 2

      On several scifi shows, we have colonized the moon and several planets. I guess if we ever do that, you won't be impressed since you read a more advance fictional way of doing that 30 years before.

    7. Re:No by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a difference between writing scifi and making technology that works. The former is imagination. The latter is innovation.

      If you want an example of Google being innovative, though, look at their self-driving cars. A lot of people have tried to crack that problem. Google actually did it.

    8. Re:No by hackula · · Score: 2

      Improvement is always incremental. If you think of an example of one that is not, you probably just do not know enough about what led to its discovery/invention. People outside the tech industry call people like Steve Jobs innovative for inventing the tablet and Mark Zuckerburg for inventing online chatting or whatever. Of course, anyone who knows anything about tech knows that both of those things have been around for decades in one form or another even though they appeared to come out of no where. The same thing happens when I talk to my Uni trained jazz friends about such and such virtuoso who I think is the best at X, Y, and Z; they typically laugh and roll their eyes because I am so clueless about how they are just copying so and so and this or that guy is so much better.

  10. Re:Cloud This! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    are you intentionally being obtuse or is this really how short sighted you are? Did you even read the summary at all?

    One of the main points of cloud based note applications like Evernote and Google Keep is to keep notes automatically in sync between many devices. This along with local and remote copies ensure your notes do not get lost.

    Sorry to break your rant.

  11. I plan on using it by linuxguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Many people here are pooh-poohing the new service for various reasons. I just wanted to provide a counter point.

    I tried evernote. I did not like it. I generally like the services Google provides and in the manner they do. I understand that nothing is guaranteed. And that one day this service may too disappear and I am OK with that. This is a price I am willing to pay.

  12. Re:Cloud This! by Proteus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Well, Google's interest is certainly in getting data; but they wouldn't be able if there weren't a market for it. Why? I don't just use one device, so I want easy, transparent access to my data no matter what I'm using. And some of my devices are quite tiny; I don't want to lose my data when I lose my device, so I'd at least want some kind of automatic remote backup...

    Not to mention that things like Evernote do a lot of processing on the data you send them that would be onerous on a portable device. For example, if I snap a pic of a business card, the text on that card is OCR'd and made searchable. That would suck hard on a phone; it's much easier to offload that capability (and corpus!) to the cloud. This saves me precious battery and improves the quality of my results.

    The issue isn't network-based computing, it's that we don't have the controls in place to assert control of our data on a provider's equipment; we are forced to trust that they won't do Bad Things. And that's a problem.

    --
    We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
  13. Isn't this just Google Notebook? by Proteus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean, a slightly different interface, but substantially the same. And Google killed that product; why do we think this time around will be better?

    --
    We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    1. Re:Isn't this just Google Notebook? by Joshua+Fan · · Score: 2

      In that case, at least there is the assurance that Google has always given you plenty of heads-up and a good amount of time to migrate your data.

  14. Re:Fool me once... don't get too comfortable by Aguazul2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder if they realize that people who are now Readerless are going to avoid relying Google products/services in future. Certainly there is no way I would build life habits around any Google service now. You don't want to get too used to using anything of theirs, don't get too comfortable. Then they will wonder why their new products aren't taking off any more.

  15. Re:I thought Google Kept Everything by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Funny

    Except for their products. They don't seem very interested in keeping those around.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  16. Tie to Google Drive is probably a good sign by Erbo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The fact that Keep is tied to Google Drive is probably a good sign for its longevity. Google probably wrote it using the same APIs via which third-party applications use Drive to store data, and Drive appears sufficiently "core" to Google and a variety of other Google initiatives (Chrome OS and Android among them) that it'll stick.

    Disclaimer: Part of my impression comes from having attended the Google Boulder Open House last night, where they gave presentations on the projects they run from the Boulder office, of which Drive is one.

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
  17. This is a rival? by Dave+Emami · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've used both Evernote and Springpad, and stuck with the latter, but after fiddling around with the web interface on Google Keep for a while, my question is: this is supposed to be a rival service? It looks more like something from the example page of a web app library. All you seem to able to do is enter text notes, and lists. Perhaps Keep for Android has more functionality, but just comparing between the web versions of all three, Keep doesn't have 1/10th of the capability of either of the others. It's like comparing Word with Notepad.

    --

    "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
  18. Re:Fool me once... don't get too comfortable by fwarren · · Score: 2

    Yes they know they will loose a lot of us Google Reader users trust But not many people used Google Reader. The total number of Google Reader users who will drop all Google based products plus everyone the can influence to do that same thing, is not a very large number. If it costs them 100,000 users I would be surprised.

    --
    vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
  19. Since they have now have "Find" and "Keep".... by mark-t · · Score: 4, Funny

    All they need now is services called "Lose" and "Weep".

  20. Sigh... by joh · · Score: 2

    I'm a bit torn right now between two ways to go on:

    a) I set up servers of my own for everything (I still have an SMTP and IMAP server for email, never trusted Gmail) like calendars, contacts, documents, notes, etc. Lots of work to set this up, a bit of money, fear of it being not secure enough if I don't put in more work and time.

    b) Just throw myself at Google and accept that every odd year a service I used and love will be gone and I have to find a new home for it after exporting and converting my data (as I have to do right now with Google Reader and the >100000 starred articles in it). Hardly any work at all, Google reads all my data.

    My anger says a), my lazy soul says b).

    But I surely don't love Google. By the way, nice article here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jw_on_tech/archive/2012/03/13/why-i-left-google.aspx

    Wait... has this thing any protocol or API to access this with other apps? Or is it again Google/Android/Browser or nothing?

  21. "A bit hesitant" is one way of putting it by Trashcan+Romeo · · Score: 2

    If Google couldn't find a way to wring enough greenbacks out of Reader, what chance does this have?

  22. Re:Fool me once... don't get too comfortable by joh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, but let me tell you that users who used Google Reader are those who read and write a lot. Each of them is easily worth 10 plain users. I was burned by that and right now I'm busy moving quite a few users and one business away from Google. Google kicking out ActiveSync and in six months CalDAV isn't exactly helping them here. Google is starting to feel somewhat uncomfortable all of a sudden. There has been a widely felt uncomfortable feeling about Google's potential to abuse their power for quite a while but all of this is the first time Google makes this potential into something you have to deal with. And this is not a good feeling.

    Google is changing right now. Even those working there notice that. Google is dropping right now all the attributes that made nerds comfortable with it. It is turning into something else.

  23. Re:Cloud This! by Howitzer86 · · Score: 2

    I use a lot of highly complex 3d and graphical software for a living and for fun. Software that has a depth to it so deep there are people who specialize in using it and nothing else. There's so much to remember, that keeping notes available to me everywhere has been a must. First it was a Wordpad document in a USB stick, then later Google Notebook, then later a Wordpad document in Dropbox, then finally Evernote. I wouldn't want to go back to the USB stick.

    I imagine Google intends to use your Keep data to help target their advertising. The only thing that Evernote has ads on is their free edition, the privacy policy explicitly states that data collection for the purpose of advertising is limited to your username and email, and the ad in the free version of the app doesn't appear targeted to what I've given it.

    I'm getting beside the point - the "cloud" is great. Just be mindeful of your chosen service. Especially if it's free. Read the privacy policy.

  24. Re:Fool me once... don't get too comfortable by JuicyBrain · · Score: 2

    I used to use iGoogle, then they took it from me.
    I used to use Google Notebook, then they took it from me.
    I used to use Google Reader, then they took it from me.

    If it wasn't for that, I'd probably be excited to hear about their new product, but I'm not. Not anymore. I will not use Google Keep especially because I do not want to get used to it so they can take it away from me. I'm done.

    So you can count me in that group Aguazul2.

  25. Re:Cloud This! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was commenting on the fact that keeping things in sync between many devices could be done with a floppy disk as early as 1982,

    You're clearly either being intentionally obtuse, as GP noted, or else you have such poor reading skills that you didn't notice or understand the word "automatically" that was there in his comment.

    My privacy is worth rather more than the convenience of "keeping notes automatically in sync between many devices."

    So don't use it. A lot of people, myself and GP included, don't care about the privacy of simple notes while preferring the convenience of auto-sync. This service is for us. With your priorities, it's clearly not for you. Yet you were the one coming out to question other people's choices. Insulting, indeed.

  26. Re:Cloud This! by afgam28 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    keeping things in sync between many devices could be done with a floppy disk as early as 1982

    If you went back in time by 15 years, and suggested on Slashdot that keeping data in sync using a sneakernet was a better option than using the Internet, you would've been laughed at. I mean, that's what networks are for, and only knucklegrinders and noobs copy files around on physical media. But now, we don't call it a a "network" anymore, we call it the "cloud", and so therefore it's stupid?

    I know that the term "cloud" is overused and silly, but networks are a great piece of technology and remote storage often makes more sense than local storage. Especially for applications like this.

    Also, if you're concerned about data mining, Evernote don't do any data mining (or at least, that's what they claim in their TOS). Just because a service is on the cloud, doesn't mean that they are necessarily mining your data.

  27. Re:Google notebook by vux984 · · Score: 2

    How would you monetize Google Reader?

    Create a section for ad's on the page, and then put unobtrusive ads in them. Use the RSS feeds as keyword fodder to feed the ad placement engine. Sell ad placement via adsense... monetized.

    Cheque please... or should i rush to patent the above since its clearly a novel invention. :p

  28. You got it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you really want Google to delete everything they know about you, go to accounts.google.com and click the link that says "Close account and delete all services and information associated with it."

    Google already cannot resell your data to anyone. You made that part up.

  29. Misguided fanboism by tanveer1979 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whenever google is criticized for yanking a "free" service, such comments come up. but is anything from google free? Sure its may not ask for money, but in google your eyeball is the product, and they make money from ads.
    Lets take gmail.
    Now its free. If google yanks it, many people will troll "it was free" "ask for a refund".
    But when I open gmail, I see ads. So in a way google is making money.
    No company is in it for charity.;
    And no company is above criticism. There is nothing wrong to feel bad or criticize the company if it cans a product you were dependent upon. "Ask for a refund" what kind of response is that. And just because its pro google, it gets modded to "insightful"!

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography