Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Linux Friendly Video Streaming?

earthwormgaz writes "I've set up a Linux XBMC + MythTV with FreeView machine for the lounge at home. It works pretty well for Linux, although things crash here and there. The Mrs wants LoveFilm or Netflix, but it seems they're Silverlight and not Linux friendly. Is there anyone doing streaming film and TV with Flash or something else that works on Linux? Failing that, is there anyway to download a film for £4-6 say, as just an AVI file or something, legally?"

147 comments

  1. amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Uses a flash player

    1. Re:amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon's streaming service is flaky with linux. The issue is DRM which for some reson is not supported in the linux version of the flash player.

    2. Re:amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Fedora at least, all of amazon's videos freeze after about 25 seconds and won't play further than that. It's due to their DRM not working correctly if what I've read is true.

    3. Re:amazon by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      That's nonsense. It's just Flash. Linux has no more trouble with it than any other platform. That includes all of the usual complaints about performance and crashing.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:amazon by MollyB · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In theory, your pronouncement would seem correct. However, I've just tried to set up Amazon Instant Video and it does not work in Firefox 20 on Lucid Lynx 10.04. It throws up a progress bar which ends with an error message that my version of Adobe Flash is not up to date (not true!). I'm glad I tried with a "free" video (I was charged $0.00). Try before you buy.

      I had unblocked all scripting, btw. When I tried the help button, it referred me to a page that explained why Chrome (-ium?) won't work on Linux and to try Firefox! Head asplodes...

      YMMV.

    5. Re:amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DRM is probably the main reason any solution using Linux is doomed from the start.

      As an example, the DRM being used for Flash is most likely Flash Access. A quick search for "linux" in their documentation (http://bit.ly/140Nght, see page 10) shows that on Windows can guarantee output protection and that it is possible to disable serving viewing licenses clients with particular OSs.

      I would bet on the fact that Amazon or Netflix would love to serve content to customers with Linux, but are being restricted from doing so by contractual obligations. If you look at all of the various devices that they support, there are some pretty obscure ones (e.g. blu-ray players: how many people connect those to the network?), which means that the Linux support issue is not because of a lack of customer base.

    6. Re:amazon by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Like I said. That sounds like a problem that has squat to do with Linux. I too have tried all of this stuff and under various conditions. That includes running Windows and MacOS on comparable hardware and getting similar results.

      Flash just sucks. Don't be too quick to blame Linux.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:amazon by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Yet I continue to be able to play Amazon streaming videos under Linux for some strange reason.

      Idiots like you love to run off at the mouth without having any clue what-so-ever.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:amazon by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      I watch Amazon prime in XBMC. Doesn't have the usual flash annoyances.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    9. Re:amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is because they stopped updating the flash player. Amazon instant video used to work and no longer does.

    10. Re:amazon by Airline_Sickness_Bag · · Score: 1

      Amazon Prime works fine with Mint 11.

      Have you done

      sudo apt-get install hal

    11. Re:amazon by yelvington · · Score: 2

      Amazon's streaming service is flaky with linux. The issue is DRM which for some reson is not supported in the linux version of the flash player.

      Amazon video works fine under Ubuntu. Use Firefox, not Chrome.
      From the FAQ

      Why can't I watch videos on my Chrome browser in Linux?
      The Flash Player Plugin in Chrome removed support for Digital Rights Management (DRM) in Linux as part of the upgrade from 11.3 to 11.4. This upgrade was bundled with the latest Chrome 22 update for Linux. If you applied the Chrome update, you are no longer able to watch DRM-protected content, such as movies and TV episodes. Trailers are unaffected as they do not use DRM. To get around this issue, you can use a different browser, such as Firefox. For information on Chrome and the Flash Player plug-in, see: https://support.google.com/chrome/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=108086.

      http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?ie=UTF8&nodeId=3757

    12. Re:amazon by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm afraid I can't let you do that Dave.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    13. Re:amazon by duphenix · · Score: 5, Informative

      Delete your ~./adobe folder and try again. I'd link to where I first saw this solution if I could remember it. I have to do this every few months, whenever Amazon "updates" the player.

    14. Re:amazon by duphenix · · Score: 1

      It works fine, adobes settings get messed up, see my post above.

    15. Re:amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (e.g. blu-ray players: how many people connect those to the network?)

      I do. Netflix, VUDU, Pandora and Youtube worked. I worked at Walmart electronics and a lot of people asked for net capable players and TVs or wireless network adapters to connect to a TV or player (although Netflix was the reason given every time, and Netflix quit using Flash). It wouldn't surprise me if the OS for these devices was Linux.
      I have to agree with the previous comment. You talk, but you do not know.

    16. Re:amazon by bloodninja · · Score: 1

      That's nonsense. It's just Flash. Linux has no more trouble with it than any other platform. That includes all of the usual complaints about performance and crashing.

      Nope, here is the service:
      http://www.amazon.com/Instant-Video/

      And here is the message I got when I tried to access it in the latest Chrome on Kubuntu:

      If you're using the Chrome browser with Linux, you must disable PPAPI to continue using Amazon Instant Video. You can also use a different Web browser, like Firefox. hundreds of other compatible devices.

      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
    17. Re:amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's because the script that's looking for flash doesn't know WTF it's doing! next you'll be blaming boontoo for you still being on 10.04? snap out of it...

    18. Re:amazon by Nutria · · Score: 1

      WD & Iomega use Linux in their media players.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    19. Re:amazon by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      bullshit, i'd given up getting flash working on my linux boxes until google fixed it up and built it into chrome. flash is a piece of shit, but it's worse on linux.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    20. Re:amazon by Karzz1 · · Score: 1

      DRM is probably...

      As an example, the DRM being used for Flash is most likely....

      I would bet on....

      Do you have any actual facts to bring to the conversation or simply pure speculation?

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
    21. Re:amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nonsense. It's just Flash. Linux has no more trouble with it than any other platform. That includes all of the usual complaints about performance and crashing.

      *cough* bullshit *cough*

      I'm sitting her in my hotel room with a dual boot laptop. Youtube runs fine on Windows 7, yet sputters and pauses constantly on my fresh Mint 14 install.

    22. Re:amazon by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      bullshit, i'd given up getting flash working on my linux boxes until google fixed it up and built it into chrome. flash is a piece of shit, but it's worse on linux.

      I've had flash working well on my Linux box since Adobe started releasing 64-bit betas. But, I have an nvidia card, which is the only thing you can be fairly sure that flash video acceleration will work with.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me 2.
      0 issues with flash, using Intel card (Lenovo X220)

  2. Let me google that for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=netflix+on+linux

  3. Google Much? by ADRA · · Score: 2

    http://how-to.wikia.com/wiki/How_to_watch_Netflix_(Watch_Instantly)_in_Linux

    As per finding a legal DRM-free film, your chances are zero for 99% of everything you'd like to watch, and just highly unlikely for the remaining 1%. Any sites that would advertise such are most likely priating the movies and then selling for profit.

    --
    Bye!
    1. Re:Google Much? by spanky_poppagasket · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wine or a virtual machine? Both options listed on the linked page are lame- I know I've tried them. Buggy or laggy, take your pick, and they generally don't take full advantage of hardware.

      To the OP, there's youtube, hulu plus, or each network's website might have full shows as well. Netflix works on an Xbox quite well so buy one of those- there's also other streaming video apps available on Xbox live, but some are subscription based last time I checked.

    2. Re:Google Much? by Skapare · · Score: 1

      If the content industry does not want to market their (usually crappy, but sometimes there are exceptions) content to me and people like me (Linux and BSD users), then so be it. But then they would be liars if they claimed that they were losing any money by me and people like me (Linux and BSD users) viewing, listening to, or reading their content. If they made the decision to not seek business revenues from me and people like me (Linux and BSD users), then they need to sleep in that bed.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    3. Re:Google Much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wine or a virtual machine? Both options listed on the linked page are lame- I know I've tried them. Buggy or laggy, take your pick, and they generally don't take full advantage of hardware.

      The submitter didn't state his HW specs but I for one don't have any trouble watching prores hq with quicktime and I think that's about as extreme as it gets. So whilst wine runs apps generally slower than windows on the same hardware, it doesn't matter if the hardware is fast enough. When it comes to games I agree with you in the sense that you don't feel like you get the full value for the money you've spent on hardware if you run an emulator. In this case, however, one solution for the submitter could be to simply upgrade to hardware that is fast enough and then use wine, if it otherwise works.

    4. Re:Google Much? by yathaid · · Score: 1

      http://how-to.wikia.com/wiki/How_to_watch_Netflix_(Watch_Instantly)_in_Linux

      As per finding a legal DRM-free film, your chances are zero for 99% of everything you'd like to watch, and just highly unlikely for the remaining 1%. Any sites that would advertise such are most likely priating the movies and then selling for profit.

      The Windows-firefox-with-silverlight-on-wine option seems to work for a lot of people, but unfortunately it does not work well on AMD Radeons.
      Mine has a very noticeable drop in framerate.

    5. Re:Google Much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In practice Linux works well on Intel graphics only.

    6. Re:Google Much? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      your chances are zero for 99% of everything you'd like to watch

      You mean your chances are 1%.

    7. Re:Google Much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... That's not what he said. Read.

    8. Re:Google Much? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Netflix for Android, if it is DVM code, should be runnable on Linux or by compilation to JVM .class files.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    9. Re:Google Much? by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Which is because the MPAA and our friends at MPEG-LA were like: "Hello there. We create non-workaeble movie copies. That is, unless you use MPEG4. Of course the MPEG 4 license from MPEG-LA restricts vendors to play anything not obscurely crappy copyprotected. But hey... We have the Copyright, which is a law we lobbied to be passed, to make sure nobody may ever make useful copies. Of course nobody cared because movies cost money and we need to get paid. It just that we decided to earn money, our way. So now everybody is fscked, because we don't have a legitemate way to earn money, without a law that grands us a monopoly on a piece of work."

      And then smart people ignored DRM and John Doe's didn't care. They soon will, but then the rest of us is forced to go completely Free Software mad and decided to put our spare time to better use.

      Now where are the people who go outside? Or should I learn some more about computing, like I did before by learning about DRM? I'm sure my time wil have been spend useful while others wasted theirs, watching DRM copies of G.I. Joe or some other mindless crap that is only as useful for living for as long as it's being watched.

      --
      Here be signatures
    10. Re:Google Much? by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

      Or to use the content MAFIAA math, there is 493700% of the content that you should be buying but are not, therefore you are a massive pirate and owe them the net value of Peru plus the total mineral wealth theoretically available in the Pacific Ocean. Experts will testify to this at the trial if payment is not recieved within 4 hours of this notice being put in the (snail) mail. Love, Content Lawyers Inc.

  4. There are plenty of embedded media players by Nutria · · Score: 1

    out there which have WiFi, Ethernet & USB, know CIFS, NFS & dlna and also have embedded Netflix, Vudu, etc clients.

    I picked one up last week for $100. The dlna client -- which is all we have experience with -- works like a charm.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:There are plenty of embedded media players by fat_mike · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm going to spread much Roku love. Amazon instant video, Netflix, Hulu, just about every church sermon in the country, The Blaze, all your premium cable channels, etc. And its a cute little hockey puck.

    2. Re:There are plenty of embedded media players by Nutria · · Score: 1

      The Roku only does streaming media, which is useless for my *large* DVD collection.

      In addition to the WD TV Live, I also have an Iomega 35045 (now discontinued) which I really like.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    3. Re:There are plenty of embedded media players by cknudsen · · Score: 3, Informative

      More Roku love... You can do local media if you have the right model. Roku 3 has a USB port for local media. You can also stream your entire ripped DVD collection direct to your Roku with Plex (which has a Linux server in addition to Windows and Mac), which will give you a much nicer UI than DLNA.

      --
      http://www.k5n.us
    4. Re:There are plenty of embedded media players by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > The Roku only does streaming media, ...which makes it the perfect compliment for an HTPC. The problem with PC based streamers is that Flash and Silverlight sucks. Even if your favorite service or plug-in is supported, you will still need to use brute force software decoding.

      That will require a beefier box than an HTPC that can decode BluRays with the GPU.

      Noise and heat are more likely to be problems with CPU decoding.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:There are plenty of embedded media players by Nutria · · Score: 2

      The WD TV Live does DLNA right out of the box. No need to install the Plex Media Server on my Linux box. The simple dlna server I've been using for two years works just fine.

      One big reason I bought that WD unit is that the web page said, "plays DLNA". No need to hunt around or interpret ambiguous marketing-speak.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    6. Re:There are plenty of embedded media players by mattyj · · Score: 1

      This.

      My usual method of assessing these types of projects:

      1. Determine how much money my time is worth.
      2. Realize that a media streaming PC is worth it for the experience of building it, but it will not save you any money in the short or long term.
      3. Buy a Roku.

      I realize the OP already has a media server but there's clearly no simple answer to this. Plus as others mentioned, there are serveral ways to stream media from a server to the Roku. You can also get Twonky Beam and beam certain things from your iPad (youtube, vimeo, etc.)

      Flash is not only a mess on Linux, if I'm not mistaken they've stopped updating it.

      If you really want a project that will waste a lot of your time, look into get_flash_videos (https://code.google.com/p/get-flash-videos/) I've had decent luck with Hulu, though no netflix just yet. And by 'waste a lot of your time' I mean getting it to work in an automated (wife-friendly) way, auto-updating the Hulu plugin which Hulu breaks all the time, etc. The script/plugins themselves are rock-solid, but you'd be writing your own scheduling/favorites infrastructure.

  5. Hulu by aitikin · · Score: 1

    Hulu Desktop has a Linux version last time I checked.

    --
    "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
  6. netflix is fine on linux by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a Netflix App for Linux that runs through Wine. It works perfectly fine.

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    1. Re:netflix is fine on linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is a Netflix App for Linux that runs through Wine. It works perfectly fine.

      It's really simple to get netflix on ubuntu, here's a howto:
      http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/opensource/how-to-get-netflix-streaming-on-ubuntu-1210/4019

    2. Re:netflix is fine on linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is a Netflix App for Linux that runs through Wine.

      Why would you need Wine if it's for Linux?

    3. Re:netflix is fine on linux by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it's easier. I have several windows apps that operate under wine. They act like they are native, if I didn't know the difference I wouldn't be able to tell.

    4. Re:netflix is fine on linux by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this link.

    5. Re:netflix is fine on linux by antdude · · Score: 1

      Bah, we want Linux NATIVE port.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  7. Backwards by Tim+Ward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The usual answer to questions like this is:

    (1) Decide what you want the computer to do

    (2) Acquire the right platform.

    Syaing "I've already got [whatever platform], how do I make it do what I want?" is often not a helpful approach.

    1. Re:Backwards by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      True story. I am a fan of Linux, but when I decided to build a media center(HTPC) system for the living room, I went with Windows 7.

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    2. Re:Backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smartassing what is the right approach after the fact is also not a helpfull comment..

    3. Re:Backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes sense for business, but we are talking home use here.

      Would windows, or even.. mac.. work better for some of my needs.. sure! But my interest in using (and advancing) linux to do what I want is stronger than my interest in say, watching netflix without jumping through some hoops.

      You need people to say "I wanna do <whatever> on linux and not accept "just install windows" as an answer if you want to progress what you can do with linux. Why fight that?

    4. Re:Backwards by LourensV · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The usual answer to questions like this is:

      (1) Decide what you want the computer to do

      (2) Acquire the right platform.

      Syaing "I've already got [whatever platform], how do I make it do what I want?" is often not a helpful approach.

      If RMS and Linus had followed that advice, GNU, Linux, and probably Slashdot would never have existed. Why should one have to buy Windows and allow customer-hostile DRM software on ones computer to be able to watch a movie easily and legally? It's your computer, and the whole point of owning it is that you can make it do what you want. Trying to do just that seems perfectly reasonable to me, and I can't see how any system that doesn't allow you to do that could be the "right platform" for anything.

    5. Re:Backwards by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Actually, he did ok (but he needs to get rid of his "things crash here and there") ; you simply forgot a step, and it's probably the more important step for all media consumers in our time:

      (3) If they refuse to take your money, don't force the issue.

      Failing that, is there anyway to download a film for £4-6 say, as just an AVI file or something, legally?

      Once he applies step 3 to the above, everything gets easy, and the Mrs will be glad they didn't settle for a streaming service.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    6. Re:Backwards by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1

      Purchase content, rip and encode to your preferred format, play back to your devices.

    7. Re:Backwards by plover · · Score: 1

      Makes sense for business, but we are talking home use here.

      Don't limit that statement by applying the extra constraints. Starting from the ideal requirements is the right approach. The economics might change things, but let them change it after you decide what the best solution is. Starting from the position of "this would be great", then you can say "oh, but I have to save some money, so let's see what I can trim from the budget" or "I want Linux in here, so if I swap this for that, I still end up with everything I want." You stay focused on the end goal, and work towards it.

      Starting from "I'm a home user with a limited budget and a desire to use Linux, let's see what I can build that displays on my TV set" may not produce the HTPC of your dreams, because the dreams are lacking from the initial goals.

      --
      John
    8. Re:Backwards by Kjella · · Score: 0

      Syaing "I've already got [whatever platform], how do I make it do what I want?" is often not a helpful approach.

      That's why 1% use Linux and 99% use something else, but here on Slashdot I'd say it's almost implicit that the question is "I want to fit a square peg into a round hole, what's the best tool for the job?" and then we discuss the merits of various power tools and that getting a round peg is not a valid option. You should have been here long enough to notice...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re:Backwards by seinman · · Score: 2

      I went with a Mac. The Mac Mini is perfect for this sort of setup, and runs all the software I need it to (XBMC, Plex, etc) and plays all the formats I want (I use VLC), AND streams everything I want (Hulu, Netflix). Never crashes, has a built in IR reciever that I use with a Harmony remote, and uses very little electricity.

    10. Re:Backwards by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Streaming is still an inferior option. Selection is inferior. Price is inferior. Quality and features are inferior. Device support is inferior.

      Even if you have access to Netflix and Amazon and whatever, you may still find it more effective to use spinny disks and just create your own iTunes style experience.

      A DRM free file allows you to have complete control over the experience and employ any decoder or user interface of your choosing.

      It's also not just Linux desktops that pose a compatibility problem with streaming services.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    11. Re:Backwards by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

      I agree. I set up a HTPC on an old mac mini running Plex, for just that reason, Plex seemed to be the best HTPC app out there and was free, so I picked a platform that would allow me to run it.

      I could have run it in a VM, on linux, but then I'm wasting hardware resources on a system that I want to be lower power and quiet. I personally like the fact that my wife can hit the power button, and 15seconds later be watching a movie.

      Dump the religion out the window and use the tool that works for you, if you want to cram XBMC on OS/2, go right ahead. Besides, I think some people just want to say they use linux to impress others. Why do you think half the posts around here start with "I use Linux at..." or "I've been a linux user for X years..."

    12. Re:Backwards by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

      We (are supposed to) have standards for this kind of thing. There's no technological reason that this shouldn't work, therefore no reason it shouldn't work. Anything else is bureaucratic, dick wagging horseshit.

    13. Re:Backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He likely has the platform already, and since it already does 99+% of what he wants, he doesn't want to go out and buy second machine which offers crapola otherwise, only for single use. He already *has* the right platform (if for example, most services use silverblight, and thats proprietary microsoft crapola, then don't get that crapola, because its crap, get a different streaming service). In my house, I do local streaming via wifi with dlna on a Linux platform (a good, non-crap platform) to an LG network appliance. A WRT54GL (running linux, an non-crap platform), kicks out a very strong wifi signal, which I have no problems streaming data to the brother-in-law a few houses over, all I have to provide him with is the right wifi password/access. Oh and since computers are Turing complete, Syaing "I've already got [whatever platform], how do I make it do what I want?" is often not a helpful approach. is utter bullshit, since it obviously is possible to get x running on y (and Turings completeness theorum was vetted by Bertrand Russell and Albert Einstein among others, so don't start muttering crap about him being wrong).

    14. Re:Backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way I see the problem is that the square peg is something being inserted by the media companies, and the round hole is... well, the OP's rear orifice. The OP is simply asking "Is there any company that will take my money without inserting the peg because I don't like it, or at least using a round one". Then posters suggesting he must use windows say, using the above analogy: "Sorry buddy, you have to accept them screwing you with square pegs, it's just the way it is".

    15. Re:Backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You settled for whatever worked at the time rather than demanding that content providers offer their content in a way that makes it more flexible on existing hardware without new software licenses, it's great for you but it doesn't help anyone else, it just reinforces the belief that DRM and insistence on particular operating systems is the way to go.

    16. Re:Backwards by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The main problem here is that Flash and Silverlight suck. Even if you are running Windows, that simple fact is going to cause you a problem. It will increase your system requirements and may make the whole system less suitable for deployment in your living room.

      Using the GPU to decode something is a LOT more efficient than the brute force CPU approach. You may not like the result of running your streaming service on a PC.

      Your CPU running full bore versus your video card barely breaking a sweat.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    17. Re:Backwards by Nutria · · Score: 2

      Honest question: why roll your own when there are dozens of embedded Linux boxes that already do it all for $50-$100?

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    18. Re:Backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went with Ubuntu and XBMC. Remote control is an Xbox DVD remote. Works great.

    19. Re:Backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poof! There goes the whole argument that "PCs are better because you can make them do whatever you want."

      I know VLC can pull streams from the web (or act as a local stream server). Not sure if it can be configured for NetFlix. It does come configured with some Free TV sources as well, but you'll have to work harder for NetFlix.

    20. Re:Backwards by plover · · Score: 1

      I never said anything about Flash or Silverlight. The requirement for an HTPC isn't "must run Flash" or "must run Silverlight", because those are just one type of means to an end, and they drive you towards a specific implementation of the solution. If you start out by thinking "Silverlight", the only obvious solution is "Big Windows machine", so you'll miss other potential solutions like adding a Roku box under remote control.

      The real requirements are high level user stories like "My spouse wants to watch Hulu Plus", "The kids want to watch YouTube", "We all want to watch DVDs and BluRays" and "To be user friendly, the remote must have a button that switches input to Hulu" and "As a viewer, I want the guide button to default to launching the program guide for whatever video source is currently selected", or "As a parent, I want the option to lock out video during homework time".

      --
      John
    21. Re:Backwards by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      (1) Decide what you want the computer to do

      (2) Acquire the right platform.

      (2b) Extend and existing platform so that it fits

    22. Re:Backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Playing DVDs on Linux counts as piracy though, so you may as well just stream it from an outlaw web site in the first place. Unless you use an offically licenced DVD player, in which case you are still using DRM.

  8. Shill alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "It works pretty well for Linux, although things crash here and there."

    Lies, FUD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    1. Re:Shill alert! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The only device I have where I find that kind of thing to be a problem really is my Sony BluRay player. You would hope that with Linux inside, it would be more robust than it actually is.

      My Ubuntu based HTPCs are rocks of Gibraltar in comparison.

      When one of my HTPCs do go wonky, they also recover a lot quicker and easier than my Sony appliance.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  9. XBMC is great, but linux is a bad platform for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I put together a little atom based box with the idea of installing XBMC, and rocking and rolling from there.

    So many hassles, flash based video like youtube and justin.tv constantly freeze, getting 5.1 audio out seems to be a pipe dream. Somewhere between samba, the kernel, the ntfs drivers, and the hardware, my USB drive I have my files on keeps getting corrupted.

    No hardware accel support in flash, so outside of xbmc I can't even watch a thumbnail sized youtube vid in chromium or firefox. It's a fucking joke.

    I used ubuntu, maybe there are slightly better distros for the task, but who knows, I gave up. I just wanted to come home, sit on the couch, and watch some movies.

    Pony up for a copy of windows home edition, and install XBMC on that. It's not going to get infected if you aren't installing warezez and browsing bad sites, and everything will work.

    For the punchline, I picked up an original xbox from a thrift store for 20 bucks, softmodded and put the latest XBMC on it. It works like a champ.

  10. If money is no object by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    (1) Decide what you want the computer to do
    (2) Acquire the right platform.

    I agree that is a usable approach if money is no object.

    Syaing "I've already got [whatever platform], how do I make it do what I want?" is often not a helpful approach.

    If you have to make do with the hardware that you already own, the "often not a helpful approach" is the only approach apart from doing without.

    1. Re:If money is no object by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      You are aware that you can build a decent multimedia system for about 400$US, right? I went over kill on mine because I want to watch my BDs and games in 3D. However, that one can run Skyrim and the like in full graphics and was only 1200$US.

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    2. Re:If money is no object by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are aware that you can build a decent multimedia system for about 400$US, right?

      Sure, but Ask Slashdot costs a lot less than $400. Maybe the geeks here have a solution that works with what OP already has.

    3. Re:If money is no object by mrjb · · Score: 3, Funny

      You are aware that you can build a decent multimedia system for about 400$US, right?

      Not everyone has 400$ to spare.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    4. Re:If money is no object by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Then it makes very little sense to ask about building a system to access PAY PER VIEW services.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:If money is no object by dcherryholmes · · Score: 2

      I think Redbox is making a killing, which would undermine your point. Just because someone doesn't have $400 in one chunk, that doesn't mean they might not have $4 every week or so.

    6. Re:If money is no object by Nutria · · Score: 2

      A system that plays video (local, LAN-based and Internet streaming) is only $100.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    7. Re:If money is no object by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      True. I often find hardware for free or nearly free though that is capable of doing what he needs. It's not perfect condition cosmetically often but I've gotten perfectly good core2duo windows boxes that are so choked with malware that people throw them out and buy another one since Best Buy charges a ton to clean them up and most people are helpless to do it themselves. It's amazing what lands on the curb, I know I made about 2 grand one year cleaning up those things by reinstalling windows and selling them off.

    8. Re:If money is no object by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I love redbox. I stop by every week or so and pick up two or three bluray movies in the middle of the week. I take them home, rip them and take them back then watch the movies on my WD HD TVlive box (which runs linux btw) in glorious 1080p on my big TV whenever I feel like it. It's so easy and effortless that I have just about stopped downloading stuff from The Pirate Bay.

    9. Re:If money is no object by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      roku2 is only about 60 dollars.

    10. Re:If money is no object by Nutria · · Score: 1

      But it is advertised as only doing streaming.

      If a plugin allows it to connect to dlna servers, then shame on them for keeping it so well hidden.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    11. Re:If money is no object by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cost difference between a Linux PC and a Windows PC? 0 (according to most of the Linux whiners around here).
       
      Cost of dual booting on a Windows/Linux/OSX machine? 0.
       
      Your argument is invalid.

    12. Re:If money is no object by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I can't say for sure but it does have a usb port.

    13. Re:If money is no object by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      Being able to get a legit copy of any flavor of Windows 7 for 20$ is still awesome though and makes building a system cheaper. Especially in the 400$ range.

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
  11. Great Britain by tepples · · Score: 2
    From the article:

    Failing that, is there anyway to download a film for 4-6 GBP

    aitikin wrote:

    Hulu Desktop

    Since when did Hulu expand to a country that uses pounds as its currency?

    1. Re:Great Britain by aitikin · · Score: 1

      There are ways around that. Hulu Desktop is free, Hulu Plus is not.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    2. Re:Great Britain by grumbel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since when did Hulu expand to a country that uses pounds as its currency?

      MediaHint is a Firefox plugin that makes Hulu work in countries where it otherwise would not.

    3. Re:Great Britain by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      Mediahint seems to be a free proxy with a FF extension. Running a proxy costs money. I wonder how this mysterious extension earns the developer(s) the money needed to pay for the proxy. The extension doesn't have an on/off switch, and the web site is completely silent about how it works or what it does. Am I too paranoid?

    4. Re:Great Britain by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      Aren't firefox extensions open-source code, by requirement, (also in order to be hosted by Mozilla)? A search engine took me to this page, and this seems to be the case. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/XUL/School_tutorial/The_Essentials_of_an_Extension

      Okay, the same extension is in the Chrome store too, but from what I gather, in terms of being safe from malware, the chrome store offers no really-certain safety. It seems like a hack on the reporting mechanisms that otherwise shutdown service. Or, maybe my firefox is now mining bitcoins. But hey, at least it runs on Linux.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  12. Use the right tool; don't be the tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    For every job there are several tools that might work. For most, there are some tools that aren't the best choice. For example, while some screwdrivers could be used to hammer nails - they aren't the best for it and certainly will be frustrating to use. Linux has several places where it shines. It also has some where it is too frustrating to futz with. Video, due to the current copyright / drm mess, is one of the later. Don't cut off your choices just to be a zealot. Get an appropriate tool. That might be a Roku box or something similar. If you want to have just one unit, it could be a TiVo premier XL 4 or something like that which will be a DVR and also give you streaming through NetFlix and Hulu Plus. Or, it might even be a Windows or Mac box. My money is probably on something like a Roku and keeping what you have for the DVR. But don't tie yourself to a tool that doesn't fit the job. Use one that is actually designed to deal with the real world - that nasty place full of drm and copyright.

    1. Re:Use the right tool; don't be the tool by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      +1

  13. Hulu Addon for XBMC by sixy · · Score: 1

    It's not Netflix or Lovefilm, but Hulu works great under XBMC w/ Linux using the Bluecop addon. http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid=121023

    1. Re:Hulu Addon for XBMC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't work in England afaik ...

  14. Re:XBMC is great, but linux is a bad platform for by jsdcnet · · Score: 1

    get a raspberry pi and set up xbmc on it. i did. it has 5.1 out, hdmi cec (turns on tv + amp, sets to right inputs automatically), runs linux, can handle 1080p video. plus it's just so cute. also unlike an old xbox it is tiny, silent, and runs off a phone charger.

    --
    no longer working for cnet
  15. my already implemented solution by louden+obscure · · Score: 2

    a roku hockey puck and plex media server running on my debian server and also my debian desktop. if i can't find what i want on netflix or any of the other channels on the roku i grab a torrent. i was using a soft-modded 1st gen xbox and xbmc but got the roku for Christmas. there are compromises using either set-up.

    --
    Serenity now, insanity later.
  16. Re:XBMC is great, but linux is a bad platform for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would a Raspberry Pi work better than the intel atom based nettop I put together?

    It's already tiny and runs off a 12v wall wart, and has enough stones for some light gaming/emulators

    The hardware is great, it's linux that sucks at multimedia.

  17. DIY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming you have the bandwidth for it, VLC Media player itself allows you to set up a great streaming video of your desktop in Linux. Other VLC clients can then connect up to the IP address of your server and stream it directly from there. I had one Windows friend who would sort of "port" me over to LiveStream by:

    a) connecting his VLC client with mine, he's now receiving my video stream
    b) he created a livestream of his -own- desktop, playing my vlc stream
    c) other people connected up to the livestream

    The benefits are that it seems to use a minimal amount of bandwidth for both me and him, plus it gets you onto livestream if you insist. But as I say, if you can afford the bandwidth and your upload speed isn't mercilessly capped, you can easily use VLC for this.

  18. That's you're view. by mrjb · · Score: 1

    Syaing "I've already got [whatever platform], how do I make it do what I want?" is often not a helpful approach."

    Sure. But saying "Swap to Windows" isn't exactly any more helpful, is it? I'm not going to shell out for a Windows license and I'm not going to install it illegaly. If I can't play netflix on the operating system of my choice, they're not having my business, simple as that. Besides, at the price I would pay for a netflix movie, I'll get the DVD instead; sometimes at a car boot sale, sometimes at the thrift shop, sometimes at poundland, and I even pay full price, at times. It might score slightly lower on the "instant gratification" scale, but at least I'm watching the films on my own terms.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  19. Re:XBMC is great, but linux is a bad platform for by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    > Pony up for a copy of windows home edition, and install XBMC on that

    Except it will have the exact same problems with Flash. The truth of the matter is that hardware acceleration is a new thing with Adobe. It's not something you can depend on in Flash because it's a new feature that webmasters have to specifically enable.

    Meanwhile, even Linux has supported full GPU acceleration for years. That copy of XBMC that you didn't really try out had that available.

    The Adobe devs are too busy fixating on clanlib.

    > For the punchline, I picked up an original xbox

    Original xbox? Really? You need to come up with less absurd stuff.

    Troll harder next time.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  20. Settle for what you don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it's not a square peg into a round hole. It's an infinitely variable shaped peg which is the perfect tool for the job. That's why 99% use Linux and 1% "make settle for what they don't understand".

    The problem is the hole is proprietary and no one knows what shape it is.

  21. AppleTV by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

    I know -- "Ewwwww Apple! We Linux users haaaaaaate Apple -- Apple isn't leet!"

    But hey - if you can get past all that, it will stream Netflix AND Hulu and stream iTunes music from your laptops and iPhones, not that you use iTunes or any other Apple stuff. But you get the streaming services you want on something that doesn't "crash here and there", and doesn't look like an eyesore homebrew project from spare parts. And it takes all of 5 minutes to set up.

    And who knows, maybe one day the idea of being able to come home and stream the song you're playing on your iPhone over your Home Entertainment System via the AppleTV will be too much to resist.

    1. Re:AppleTV by aminorex · · Score: 1

      you just peed in the pool

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  22. Roku? by mark_reh · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just got a Roku 3 and the user interface issues of the previous versions are fixed. Response is snappy and you can stream video from Plex media server (native Linux app) and other streaming servers (Playon, from Windows, for example). The Roku box will handle Netflix for you (and Hulu+) and will be easy enough for your wife to use without any training, and you'll have access to all your HDD based content as well.

  23. How about PS3? by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    Like Sony says, "it only does everything". Plays games, streams Netflix and Hulu+, plays content from DLNA servers, plays blu-ray discs, including 3D. PS3's are probably on sale since the PS4's are coming out...

    1. Re:How about PS3? by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      PS3's are probably on sale since the PS4's are coming out...

      Oddly enough, they're not. The cheapest you're going to find one is still in the $250+ range. You could actually buy a Roku and Blu-ray player combo for cheaper these days. Or just buy a blu-ray player (most of them will stream video now).

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  24. No Flash by cerberusss · · Score: 1

    For me personally, I need decent Flash. My (European) country's national broadcaster has a digital Flash-based channel. I recently found out that Adobe dropped Flash hardware acceleration somewhere last year. You can't force it on through some obscure configuration file, either.

    That makes for a big disadvantage for most Linux-friendly stuff, I need something Microsofty or Apple-ish.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:No Flash by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately Linux Flash is a bit of an abandoned mess right now...

    2. Re:No Flash by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Yeah and it's pretty surprising to me, considering the amount of Chromebooks and other devices that are currently sold.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  25. Android tablet by rwa2 · · Score: 2

    Netflix works pretty well on Android, just pick up a nice Tegra tablet with an HDMI output and you're all set.

    Or just buy a used Windows laptop to run Netflix on. It's not like that box is ever going to be doing anything else, so it'll free up your nice PCs to run Linux and get actual work done.

    1. Re:Android tablet by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Netflix works pretty well on Android, just pick up a nice Tegra tablet with an HDMI output and you're all set.

      I bet it costs about the same as a dedicated media that does everything I want with a simple, muggle-friendly UI.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  26. Re:XBMC is great, but linux is a bad platform for by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    > The hardware is great, it's linux that sucks at multimedia.

    No. It's you that sucks. You are a really lame troll.

    Plenty of Linux users (myself included) do very well with Atom based nettops.

    Linux does quite well at multimedia. I don't have download anything called Shark007 in order to get my codecs sorted out. Linux is no worse supported on an Atom based nettop than Windows is.

    The limiting factor is CPU guzzling streaming services that will choke an Atom anyways.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  27. There is a PPA for that by moj0joj0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    For quite some time I just resigned myself to the fact that I'd have to boot into windows or use some other poor method to get my netflix on... then Erich Hoover arrived with a heroic flast to his eye, chin thrust forward and proclaimed, "Do not go gentle into that sudo shutdown -r now! Rage, rage against the needlessness of these cursed reboots!

    Here is how to install the Netflix Desktop App on Ubuntu. Open a terminal and run these commands:
    sudo apt-add-repository ppa:ehoover/compholio
    sudo apt-get update
    sudo apt-get install netflix-desktop More info here: http://www.iheartubuntu.com/2012/11/ppa-for-netflix-desktop-app.html

    1. Re:There is a PPA for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crazy, this was the first result for "netflix for linux desktop" on google.

      Almost like the poster took zero effort to search and see if it was possible.

  28. 50$ solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    putting media (or any valuable data) on a windows file system is just asking for trouble. I was in a similar situation and found that it was just easier to buy a wireless ROKU box for 50$ and move it to the room where needed. I can still pull streaming video form amazon and netflix to my MYTHTV boxes through the chrome browser. but the wife factor was not friendly so Roku makes up for that.

  29. Flash+HTML5. Also, Recommend Plex. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I usually go with Plex and Chrome. has tons of content and just works with Flash / HTML5. No silverlight here.

  30. Re:XBMC is great, but linux is a bad platform for by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    "Meanwhile, even Linux has supported full GPU acceleration for years. That copy of XBMC that you didn't really try out had that available."

    That's a lie. GPU acceleration totally depends on your driver. e.g. I ran a VIA system (more for NAS than for desktop use) that has a h264 decoder in the GPU, but the driver only does basic 2D display and you have to compile from SVN for that. I would need to use Windows 7 or 8 to get GPU acceleration (including basic OpenGL)
    If you run AMD open source driver : the feature has only very recently been ported to it (so, it will work in some future distro, or in a current one if you update the driver and whatever else in the near future)

    With an Atom it might as well be a crap shoot (pray that you have Intel graphics and not PowerVR, then work up from that). Apparently here, XBMC supports the Intel Intel Atom, through Intel's API, but Flash does not, and the CPU is not powerful enough for youtube 480p, maybe not enough for 360p, maybe can manage to display some 240p.

  31. Plex by duanco · · Score: 1

    Plex...you will be pleased.

  32. HBO and Headweb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://hbonordic.com/home
    https://www.headweb.com/

  33. Re:XBMC is great, but linux is a bad platform for by knarf · · Score: 1

    Funny that. I never seem to have problems with multimedia, be it streaming (which I usually un-stream first so I can play it on anything attached to the server) or file-based media. Using Linux. Maybe Linux does not suck at multimedia after all... which might explain the multitude of multimedia-related hardware on the market running Linux.

    What makes the Raspberry Pi a good choice for this type of application is its lower power consumption, lower price, lower maintenance, lower heat output, lower noise, lower just about everything than just about everything. Yes, that includes lower CPU performance than just about everything so you don't want to be running heavy stuff on it.

    Is it better than that intel atom thing you use? It might be, or it might not. It depends on your needs. If you happen to run on a limited power budget - a cabin in the woods, a boat, a mobile home - it is.

    By the way, I don't see where the author of the Raspberry post said it was *better* than your intel thing. Why did you feel the need to defend it?

    --
    --frank[at]unternet.org
  34. The Easy Way by fuego451 · · Score: 1

    With Debian, android and Windows 7 machines, the cable cut and Tier II Internet (2 up, 20 down Mbps) in the house I simply use streaming devices for my TV's: Samsung wifi blu ray player for the big TV and a nice little WD Play TV device for my bedroom TV. Simple, inexpensive and fewer hassles.

  35. Re:XBMC is great, but linux is a bad platform for by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    Full screen 480p YouTube works smoothly on a Windows netbook. On Linux (same hardware), it drops frames due to lacking hardware acceleration.

  36. Flash Access requires libhal, hald by tlambert · · Score: 5, Informative

    Flash Access requires libhal, hald

    This has been known since Feb 2011, which Amazon started encoding new content for TV shows using the newer version of Flash Access.

    The Flash Access Component requires that the local machine support Libhal and hald, even though they are deprecated by over 7 years now by the OpenDesktop project.

    It uses the information gathered from this interface to create a machine unique identifier, which it then uses as a content crypto key on the stream, and then you can play Amazon, Youtube, and Google Play content just fine.

    Otherwise it bitches that your Flash is "out of date", when what it really means is that it can't install the Flash Access component because the libraries and supporting components used in the installation success test aren't there.

    Most streaming applications won't support Linux because it doesn't require signed system components, and without that, the can't protect their content from piracy, commercial skipping, and so on when they stream to Linux systems; it's too easy to interpose libraries, system calls, and so on and take unencrypted digital content and rip it to some mp4 or other container file format.

    This is also why the components from Provo, Utak for abc.com, nbc.com, and cbs.com have never been ported to Linux, and probably never will be.

    1. Re:Flash Access requires libhal, hald by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Amazingly enough, Windows seems to be the prime hackery for video of all sorts, despite have these signed system components. Probably something to do with security....

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    2. Re:Flash Access requires libhal, hald by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Amazingly enough, Windows seems to be the prime hackery for video of all sorts, despite have these signed system components. Probably something to do with security....

      My understanding is that if you want to rip digital content as digital without encryption, then you buy a Unigraf UFG-04 LVDS, LVDS Frame Grabber or a Gopel Electronic 4120 - Frame Grabber, or Teledyne Dalsa X64-LVDS. Then you take the connector which would normally go to a physical flat panel, and plug it into the card instead. Then you just grab each frame as it's "displayed" by the virtual LVDS device. After that, you have a perfect digital copy at the resolution of the emulated flat panel. Since you emulate the entire EDID handshake, even secured hardware has no idea that it's not talking to a real flat panel, and since you are already outside the encryption path, there's nothing that can prevent it.

      So it really doesn't matter what they do to try and stop you, as long as you are willing to spend money on hardware and write the software to do the work. These are the guys getting the Ad revenue from Ad interposition over the torrented/streamed content, which is why they spent on the hardware in the first place.

      I'm not claiming that DRM is effective on platforms other than Linux, or per the above, that it can actually truly be effective at all, I'm just saying they don't want it to be easy for absolutely everyone to do. The number of people with hardware workarounds is always necessarily going to be rather small, which leads to a smaller number of choke-points.

      If you support a platform that doesn't even make a half-assed tip of the hat to some type of DRM throughout the entire software stack, you've already given up on the idea that most people will be incapable of the necessary software hackery, since there will be "apt get" packages, and probably bootable DVD images with the necessary software already installed.

      This translates to having given up completely on rights enforcement at all, since everyone with a computer capable of /installing the packages/booting the media/loading s VM/ is a potential transfer point from a legitimate consumer and a torrent of the content in question.

      That's not going to happen.

    3. Re:Flash Access requires libhal, hald by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I was aware of solutions like yours. In fact, there recently was a blog post about how easy it was to build your own HDCP adapter. Both of those are beyond the means of the normal person.

      What I was talking about was the plethora of programs such as SlySoft's AnyDVD, DVDFab's HDDVDDecrypter, MakeMKV, and the host of other Windows based solutions that will all handle the DRM at the source, and give you a pixel perfect, or darn close copy. BD+, being processed the way it is, means that you can never be 100% sure without going through a lot of extra effort to get a true pixel perfect copy, probably via the means you described. I understand those are now click to install, click to rip (Not having windows...). No need for fancy capturing hardware. OTA is not encrypted at all, and gives you a nice 1080i stream via tuners like SiliconDust's HDHomeRun, which also is almost a single click install for tuner software.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    4. Re:Flash Access requires libhal, hald by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?

      What full-software readily-available DRM cracks would actually do, is kill the black market and profit margins of those *with* the hardware.

      There would be no net overall increase in pirated content. Only nobody else other than the author would reap benefits from its content.

      How is that bad?

      And... you'd increase your potential customers by a great deal, if you believe Ubuntu is gaining so much market share as they say. (not implying it's false, just implying it might not be relevant)

  37. Keep focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Mrs wants LoveFilm or Netflix.
    Maybe you should deliver and not persuade.
    If you want to fight windmills then go right ahead, meanwhile let the Mrs save face among friends.
    Really, no really, don't get your priorities mixed up.

  38. Google Play by barlevg · · Score: 1

    Google Play plays through Youtube. So if you can use Youtube, you should be able to use Play. Full disclosure: the one time I used Google Play to rent a movie, I ended up watching it on a Windows computer. Not because I was having issues with Linux--the Windows computer was just better situated for watching.

  39. Amazon and Hulu by Trelane · · Score: 1

    Both work on Linux, although Amazon requires the Flash plugin (new Chrome-only Pepper API one will not work) with the HAL (there's a HAL package on Ubuntu: http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/multi/flash-player-11-problems-playing.html) The Adobe DRM for Amazon may come into a future Pepper API plugin but it is not currently implemented, which is why you need the old plugin Flash plugin + HAL. Hulu works with both, as far as I can tell. It's been a while since I've watched stuff on there, though.

    --

    --
    Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    1. Re:Amazon and Hulu by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Amazon is flaky on Linux. It's not unusual to have to reload the page because it chokes (sometimes in the middle of playback) or to have the browser asplode.

      They're also daft on Android. They only permit installation on a small subset of Google TV devices. The APK won't work on other systems (it used to, but now it doesn't, and it only ever worked on Gingerbread devices.)

      If you have lots of bandwidth and don't need more than 480p then the Wii is still the hero if what you want is Netflix and Amazon. Otherwise you still want a PC, or a Roku.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  40. Re:XBMC is great, but linux is a bad platform for by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    XBMC is too heavy for Raspberry Pi. It's chunky on it. As well, it doesn't support Netflix. The Amazon plugin is shaky. OpenELEC is busy confusing itself by doing stuff like taking bluetooth out and putting it back in. If you are actually going to go buy something to do this job, a Raspberry Pi is absolutely the wrong thing to spend your money on. It's not the worst media player, but it really doesn't provide the kind of experience it probably should. The old Xbox may not be tiny or silent, or run off a "phone charger" (most phone chargers are 1A or less at 5V...) but XBMC was much smoother on it than it is on the R-Pi.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  41. Re:XBMC is great, but linux is a bad platform for by rklrkl · · Score: 1

    I'm using tvheadend for a backend (on a beefy desktop PC with TV cards, SSD and TBs of storage) and an Acer Revo 3710 (a "little atom based box") with XBMC on Ubuntu 12.04. No problems with hardware acceleration (uses Nvidia ION 2) once I installed the proprietary nvidia-current driver or sending 5.1 audio to my 5.1 setup (obviously use the Sound section in Ubuntu's system settings to test the audio before doing the same in XBMC's audio settings). It should be noted that everything is connected HDMI (Revo -> receiver-> plasma TV) and I was worried HDMI audio might not work, but it seems to be fine.

    My only beef with XBMC on my setup is that it can hang at "exit points" periodically (either stopping a video/live TV stream from playing or trying to exit XBMC completely).

    It should be noted here that I don't watch movies on Youtube - it's about the last place I'd think of looking! I tend to watch local or LAN-networked files from a DVD or Blu Ray rip - any streamed video is useless IMHO (it buffers unless your connection is perfect and can't picture search FF/REW or even position jump at decent speeds),

  42. these are not the droids you're looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One option is to run an android emulator and use the netflix android app.

  43. Use a Smart TV running Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The days of "my service does not work it must be Linux problem" are over. Netflix and many other services are designed to play to many clients other than MS-Windows. The current generation of SMART TVs support various apps. Both my current Samsung and previous LG TVs run Linux. The Samsung has a Netflix app that does not have problems.

  44. Netflix + ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have this working perfectly on my htpc:

    Is a customized wine install + ffox for windows + some old version of silverlight.

    I know there is a hulu desktop app that is also linux friendly. There are xbmc and amazon prime plugins that work just fine.

    http://m.lifehacker.com/5963726/netflix-finally-comes-to-ubuntu-in-the-form-of-an-unofficial-desktop-app

  45. Re:XBMC is great, but linux is a bad platform for by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    "Multimedia" may work fine under Linux, but the no-longer-maintained Adobe Flash proprietary plugin definitely sucks. It is, IMO, one of the reasons why Flash as a content delivery platform needs to die. It was developed by a company who put a developer who was vocally and publicly anti-Linux in charge of their Linux plugin. Hooray.