Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What Magazines Do You Still Read?

AmiMoJo writes "Over on Slashdot Japan, there is a discussion about what magazines people still read (Google translation of Japanese original). Japanese people still tend to read a lot of periodicals, while in the west readership seems to be in decline. Do you read magazines regularly, or at all? Are websites a good substitute, or do print publications still offer something worth spending your cash on?"

57 of 363 comments (clear)

  1. None by gameboyhippo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    None... The Internet has replaced the function of magazines.

    1. Re:None by syntheticmemory · · Score: 2

      Not so fast. Some magazines may have a limited shelf life, but they don't need batteries or a charge. .

    2. Re:None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cracked.com is a perfect example of how to move from a print publication to an online model.

    3. Re:None by mtrachtenberg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A subscription to The New Yorker is like giving yourself a little treat every week. A subscription to Mother Jones helps pay David Corn's salary. I'm sure there are others worth subscribing to. I've never found a rapid computer multimedia data access mechanism that matches sheets of paper.

    4. Re:None by gvaness · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I tend to not carry my phone around at home, and still like to read something in the bathroom. Maxim and Money atm. Tends to be whatever family subscribes me to as gifts though.

    5. Re:None by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Batteries? Oh, those. No, I rarely bother with them other than the internal ones you get with mp3 players, kindles, tablets etc.

      You bother with them all the time, by having to remember to plug them in at night. You bother with them when you have to think about whether you're going to be able to finish the movie you're watching on the plane before the battery dies. You bother with them by having to keep your eye on the little battery symbol because once that goes down, your "mp3 players, kindles, tablets etc." are useless until you find somewhere to plug in.

      When people are asked what is the most important feature they wish they had on their electronic devices, "longer battery life" is always #1. So yes, people are clearly bothered with them.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:None by RabidReindeer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Cracked.com is a perfect example of how to move from a print publication to an online model.

      Actually, Cracked was a meh, me-too imitation of MAD as a print publication. They got MUCH better in their online incarnation.

    7. Re:None by metlin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed. I couldn't agree more. There are some magazines that I continue to read regularly.

      The Economist, National Geographic, Harper's, Paris Review, NY Review of Books, Granta, and Foreign Affairs to name a few.

      The content in some of these magazines are unique and not available online. More importantly, it keeps these publishers and writers in business, which to me is a great incentive.

      I am happy to pay for these publications because they are well written, well edited, and have content that is not easily available elsewhere. They are not just sensationalism and raw data that's poorly written by a 20 year old (e.g. cnn.com) -- they are well written pieces with commentary, insights, and opinions that I value.

    8. Re:None by Beorytis · · Score: 2

      ...beautiful magazines...

      Best. Euphemism. Ever.

    9. Re:None by damnbunni · · Score: 4, Informative

      By completely changing your content type?

      The website Cracked is pretty much nothing like the long-running magazine Cracked.

      Cracked was a fairly successful ripoff of MAD. The problem, and it's the same one MAD faces, is that you can't really parody pop culture any more because it's become self-parodying. MAD stays in business, but just barely. There doesn't seem to be room for more than one mag in that segment now, though.

    10. Re:None by tylikcat · · Score: 2

      The Economist and Science are my top two... though I mostly read them both online (and my roommate reads the print versions because it's cheaper to buy the print versions than online only.)

      I've let my New Yorker subscription lapse, but will probably resubscribe one of these days. (I'm a doctoral student who lives in a zen center and teaches martial arts. Not a lot of time. Or money, for that matter. But mostly, the back issues were getting ahead of me, and I felt guilty every time I looked at the pile.)

      I'm considering picking up The Smithsonian - it'd be a nice change of pace, and it's only a monthly.

    11. Re:None by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You bother carrying one on a plane? What's wrong with the dozens of movies, tv shows, and documentaries showing on the screen built into the back of the seat in front of you?

      The cheap-ass airline I fly on mostly doesn't have such niceties as a magic picture box on the back of the seat in front of me.

      Hell, I'm surprised they still have toilet paper in the bathroom. Last time I flew I swear I saw one of the stewardesses fueling the plane before takeoff. This is the airline that declared bankruptcy and took all the employees' pensions to pay bonuses to management (the same management who took the company into bankruptcy in the first place).

      Although they're not really serious about cutting costs, because when I recommended that they jettison the crying baby in the seat behind me in order to save weight (and thus, jet fuel) they acted like they didn't hear me.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    12. Re:None by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am happy to pay for these publications because they are well written, well edited, and have content that is not easily available elsewhere.

      Sure, except that they're all available online or in a digital format (e.g. eBook).

      The Economist's
      National Geographic
      Harper's
      Paris Review
      The New York Review of Books
      Granta
      Foreign Affairs

      Granta and The Paris Review appear to only have digital versions available, but the rest provide logins and a means to access the full content of each article online, from what I can gather. And, honestly, if you're interested in supporting these magazines, shouldn't you be reading them on a screen anyway, since the printing and distribution account for some of their largest costs?

      I do believe something is lost in the experience when we switch to screens from paper, but I also believe that it is largely outweighed by the convenience of easier access, the availability of more content at any given moment, and the lower costs for content creators. And for someone like you, who seems to believe that content is king, I'm surprised you wouldn't agree.

    13. Re:None by fast+turtle · · Score: 2

      then you haven't used "DNI" direct neural input. Much faster then paper or even computer. Just turn it on and get what ever news the government wants you to think today.

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    14. Re:None by gander666 · · Score: 2

      I subscribe to The Economist. I read some of it online, but I find that I typically will read the dead tree version cover to cover. On my iPad or on the web I skip a lot of the European and British content. So for me, the paper version is superior.

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    15. Re:None by oldhack · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is the airline that declared bankruptcy and took all the employees' pensions to pay bonuses to management...

      Well, that narrows it down.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  2. Push vs. Pull by dtmos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Print publications are literally put into my hand, giving me more incentive to read them upon receipt. Web sites require an active effort on my part to go read them, which is often not done due to my habit of procrastination ("I'll take time to check that tomorrow"). Even email links to my monthly periodicals go unused, for similar reasons.

    To me, it's the difference between polling- and interrupt-driven systems. The processor has to be constantly (or at least repetitively) awake to poll, while the processor can be asleep and awoken by an interrupt. The interrupt-based system is usually the lower-energy way to go.

    1. Re:Push vs. Pull by oGMo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes if only there were some sort of Rich Site Summary that could be published by websites that would allow a piece of software ... let's call it an aggregator to be fancy, or maybe just a reader... to pull content for you, much like a mail delivery person. If you found a site you liked, you could just click on a link to subscribe, and your friends could share articles and feeds with you. Google should get on this!

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    2. Re:Push vs. Pull by PRMan · · Score: 2

      Yes. But it has to be Really Simple Syndication in order to work...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:Push vs. Pull by dtmos · · Score: 2

      to pull content for you . . . and your friends could share articles and feeds with you.

      Yeah, thanks for that 21st-Century update -- I'll be sure to check out RSS RSN.

      The trouble with such schemes is that they assume that I know a priori what information I either want or need, and that is almost never the case. It's hard to learn new stuff when the information to which you're exposed is pre-filtered to include only the stuff you think you want to hear. (It may harden one's political beliefs, but I wouldn't consider that a good thing.)

      One of the benefits of a print journal is that I get exposed to a wide variety of subject matter, including stuff I either didn't know existed, or thought I wouldn't find interesting, giving me a chance to learn new things and change my opinions.

  3. Active web user, still read periodicals by shbazjinkens · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's really no substitute on the web (for free) that replaces quality scientific periodicals. If I want to know about some uncommon subject, often the only way to get that information is by paying a credible source to deliver it regularly. The news-media and blogosphere aren't particularly interested in detailing the latest way to detect carbon nanotubes of a particular chirality, or the latest low-energy method of measuring gas flow. That's why I'm still an IEEE member, among other organizations.

    1. Re:Active web user, still read periodicals by ad5mqesj · · Score: 2

      Absolutely - I read SCIENCE (pub of the AAAS) a bit everyday, learn not only about things in my field but all sorts of interesting things in other fields that I would be very unlikely to encounter elsewhere. I like to format too - a paragraph or two covering the high points for the technically literate non-specialist, a slightly more detailed summary later on, and the full blown paper for those who want all the gory details. Once a month I donate the 4 or 5 issues from the last month to the local library (I live in a very rural area and the library can't afford to subscribe to such things itself). According to the librarian it's quite popular.

  4. WIRED by bigjarom · · Score: 2

    I still have a subscription to the physical version of Wired, and the content is top-notch - when I do read it; but I usually don't read it in that format. It's all online, and sitting down with a magazine is just not something I ever think to do anymore. I will very likely not renew.

    1. Re:WIRED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wired used to be a great magazine until they switched their format a couple years back. Dropped it since it seemed to be full of Advertisements only, instead of true tech articles. It just sucks now, and no longer has any content that's worth paying for. (Electronic or Print version)

  5. New Yorker by HighBit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The New Yorker's commentary is often insightful, and I read it regularly. I also occasionally read The Atlantic.

    In general, magazines (either print or online) are still where one goes to get well-researched, long-form articles.

  6. Linux Format by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2

    It reminds me a lot of the old Amiga magazines, and indeed has more than a few of the same writers. Though the cover disk is not as important these days it still comes in useful now and then.

  7. None by azav · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I would relish though is a magazine reader like a 17" touch screen iPad, but one with the smoothness of display of the iPad and the ease on the eyes of the liquidInk of the Kindle.

    I WANT this.

    I want it for reading PDFs of programming manuals, for reading beautiful magazines, for browsing beautiful coffee table books in digital format.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  8. Playboy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Know it's a long standing joke, but the articles are actually well written across a broad spectrum. My husband doesn't mind the pictures either. ;) Still love the tactile feel of real books too. (Yes I have an e-reader as well). But sometimes I don't want to take one to the beach and risk it getting soaked or stolen.
    Unfortunately with electronic media, we lose the ability to loan/share a lot of the content; which I think is the biggest loss of all. Heck, I would consider buying more e-books if they were only $1-$3, but generally you don't see a discount between the two (or maybe a $1 discount). Just not worth the expense at this point...

  9. These are good by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 2

    1. MOJO
    2. National Geographic
    3. New York Times Magazine(some of the best writing out there)

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  10. Re:They still have magazines? by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bought a newspaper last Sunday. The bird cages needed to be cleaned.

    Just for old time's sake, I pulled out the want-ads, intending to look in a couple categories... I couldn't believe that those four skimpy pages were the entire Sunday want-ads. It used to be an entire separate section of the newspaper. One of the categories I was looking for didn't even exist.

    I'm a little surprised that newspapers manage to stay in business.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  11. c't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    C't is the top computer magazine in Germany. Their online newsticker is among the most visited German web sites and they make the tool which is used for testing the integrity of USB thumbdrives all over the world: h2testw. It is available in print and online with the same content.

  12. Also on Slashdot.jp by mutube · · Score: 2

    Can you sex with robot? 9% say yes!

    If you're looking for an answer to the slow decline of Slashdot.org here it is: .jp has the news that matters!

  13. Premier Guitar by blackmonday · · Score: 2

    Premier Guitar posts all their content online for free, but the paper version is perfect for me. Hey that rhymes I better go write a song...

  14. The Economist by imlepid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I read The Economist (every week) and I am constantly amazed by its quality and informativeness. Although, I must mention, I technically don't read most of it since I consume the Audio Edition during my commute to work. The articles I don't get to during the week (because my commute is slightly shorter than the average audio edition length) I typically try to catch up on with the dead-tree edition that is delivered. If the USPS ever ends Saturday delivery that's one thing I'll miss: getting my delivery of the economist before Monday.

    The subscription price is a little steep (about US$120), I feel like I could not go without it.

    1. Re:The Economist by Hackysack · · Score: 2

      I also read the Economist. It's a very informative magazine, packed with information on any given week. I do still read the dead-tree edition of it too. One of it's strengths is the near complete lack of advertising. Well worth killing a few trees over.

    2. Re:The Economist by imlepid · · Score: 2

      I found it hard to complete every issue every week until I discovered the aforementioned audio edition. Now my drive to work is much more bearable (bordering on a pleasure!). If you have a short (or no) commute, YMMV of course. :)

    3. Re:The Economist by doom · · Score: 2

      I went through an Economist phase, but gave up on it during the run-up to the Iraq war. I was getting enough stupid war propaganda from home-grown sources, I didn't need to pay for an import on top of that.

      Since the Iraq war thing, there have been other things that turned me off... e.g. a cover photo of a demonstration in Indonesia-- as I remember it-- carefully selected to make it look dramatic and violent, when the actual event was fairly peaceful.

      I sometimes wonder if the Economist has ever done any market research... the people I know who read it-- admittedly a selected set-- are all relatively liberal types who like the fact that it writes about places outside the US as though they really exist. They read it in spite of the silly conservative "leaders" up front, not because of them...

  15. Lots! by rbanzai · · Score: 2

    I still read lots of magazines. National Geographic, Smithsonian, several history magazines, Car and Driver, Outdoors, Discover, FlyPast, and so on. I prefer the print format for being easy on the eyes as well as lighter and easier to manipulate than any tablet. At this point I don't have even the slightest interest in digital subscriptions to magazines.

  16. While on holiday by Spudley · · Score: 2

    While on holiday recently (translation: that's "vacation" for all you Americans), my brother-in-law lent me his copy of T3 magazine.

    T3 is a consumer-level technology magazine. A gadget mag for people who think they're a bit techie but are really just tech consumers.

    I've not read T3 in years, and I wouldn't have actually bought a copy even then. But I actually found myself reading a lot of it. Not because it was talking about anything I didn't know about, but because it was presenting a significantly different perspective on things to the kind of web sites I normally visit. I was quite interesting to get a different perspective and see how the consumer market thinks about some of the devices on offer at the moment.

    The reasons all this is relevant to this discussion are:

    1. Asking about paper magazines to the Slashdot crowd is going to get a predictable response. But you'd be a fool if you think for a second that the Slashdot crowd is in any way representative of the wider public. Slashdot users do not read magazines any more, but other people do.

    2. If my brother-in-law had been reading a T3 website instead of the magazine, it's virtually certain that I wouldn't have borrowed his copy; I'd have stuck with my own preferred sites. The internet is great at making all things available to all men... but most of us cocoon ourselves in our own little parts of the internet and very rarely venture out. We don't get that alternative perspective, and it leads to narrow mindedness and blinkered thinking.

    --
    (Spudley Strikes Again!)
  17. Re:2600! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

    I second that one! Especially since I can pay cash anonymously and not end up on a "list" somewhere.

    Look over there! See that camera? Heh, heh, heh.

  18. Still a few Discover and Make magazine by rleibman · · Score: 2

    Discover because I find it hard to quit after nearly 30 years of reading it every month. Make because it's beautiful and inspires me, I also get Fine Cooking and occasionally buy at the newstand Dwell.

  19. Short list by paiute · · Score: 2

    Smithsonian is the best, one I am willing to pay for. National Geographic, though their gee whiz coverage of the world is annoying sometimes. Make, got that as a gift and really enjoyed it for a couple of years. I would pay for NewScientist if I could afford it.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  20. Rolling Stone by aggles · · Score: 2

    The only magazine I read (and pay for) is Rolling Stone. Its only rock and roll, but I like it.

  21. iX by gravity · · Score: 2

    german magazine: iX, http://www.ix.de/

  22. Private Eye by aembleton · · Score: 2

    I've taken out a subscription to Private Eye http://www.private-eye.co.uk/. I find it funny and insightful and get much more depth of what's going on than I get out of the internet. In additional it feels good to be able to just flick through dead trees and spot something interesting. At £28/year it's not noticably expensive either.

  23. Inc. and Popular Mechanics by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2

    I like Inc. - they've definitely done a good job of keeping the magazine fresh and unique. Popular Mechanics is also just wonderful. They cover not only automotive stuff but pretty much all kinds of DIY issues. They even pushed Linux as a good OS for a home entertainment system a few years ago. Lots of different topics in there, it's an interesting magazine.

  24. I read... by antdude · · Score: 2

    Hardcopies: Wired and Entertainment Weekly

    Digital: Better Software

    All are free due to coupons and work.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  25. Hmm... by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

    What magazines do I still regularly buy and read?

    Cook's Illustrated, Saveur, Neo,Otaku USA, Shop Notes, Wood, Fine Woodworking, Popular Woodworking, Mother Earth News, Reader's Digest, National Geographic... These are just ones off of the top of my head, and in any given month somewhere between a third and half of them find their way into my shopping cart.

    The 'net certainly provides a firehose from which to choose, but for the most part it serves up cold, stale Chicken McNuggets... while magazines still (for the most part) serve perfectly cooked Coq a Vin. Quantity isn't quality.

  26. MaximumPC and Consumer Reports by RubberDogBone · · Score: 2

    Only two now: MaximumPC and Consumer Reports. MaxPC makes their back issues available for free and I also pay for access to CR's website, but I find the dead tree version works better on the throne, quite honestly. And I don't have time to sit and read anywhere else.

    Why pay for these? Both mags offer content that I like and which is more or less difficult to obtain elsewhere, and it's in a format I like. For MaxPC, I am a long-time reader going back to when it launched as boot magazine, and I prepay for years in advance because I want the mag to stick around. CR I simply use as an info source and comparison tool when I need to buy something out of my usual areas of expertise. I pay them to offer advise on which paint or vacuum cleaner or laundry detergent to buy, because I have no idea myself and no time or money to just guess. It works well. Don't have to agree with their choices. As with MaxPC's reviews, having their opinion is useful even if I may not blindly follow it.

    And I have tried the digital magazines. The tablet PDF version does not tolerate moisture well and requires things like a charged battery, some pre-planning to take the device along, etc. and you are stuck holding it and usually can't also use it for something else. The paper mags simply sit there waiting for someone to read. Doesn't care if I take a shower -there are no moisture sensors to trip. Does not matter if I drop it on the floor. It won't shatter into hundreds of dollars worth of parts or get flushed.

    Total cost for the two mags is about $30 a year plus another $60 for the CR website. ... bleah actually that's a lot of money. Maybe I need to rethink CR.

    --
    Sig for hire.
  27. Re:They still have magazines? by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I bought a newspaper last Sunday. The bird cages needed to be cleaned.

    Just for old time's sake[...]

    Just for old times' sake, I took a shit on the front page and wiped my ass with the sports section

    What a coincidence. So did the birds.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  28. None anymore by xQuarkDS9x · · Score: 2

    I haven't read any magazines in print for a few years now. If only because even once good magazines such as Popular Science, Scientific American, and Popular Science are now pretty much 80% ad pages and 20% content. I do not want to read a 15 page article in the magazine from a company trying to showcase the latest car, product, or god knows what else.

    You look back oh lets say 10-15 years ago in the three mags I mentioned above and you seemed to see a lot more content and a heck of a lot less ads.

    --
    You must master your joystick like a fisherman masters bait! - Gimpy
  29. Several by Sir+Holo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Harper's
    The Atlantic
    Lapham's Quarterly
    Foreign Affairs
    (used to)
    A few trade magazines

    I read them in the hot tub, on travel, in bed.

    No worries if they get wet, or lost, or if you fall asleep while reading them.

    Most also come with full access to their web site, which often includes access to their entire back-catalog!

  30. Re:Paper still has its place, alas. by kuhnto · · Score: 2

    Im reading this right now in the bathtub on an ipad in a ziplock bag. But i read books there too.

    --
    "A 'person' is smart. 'People' are dumb, panicky animals and you know that."
  31. Re:Probably too many. by SteveFoerster · · Score: 3

    Playboy. Had a subscription since '89. Don't judge me.

    In other words, many of the girls in there now were born after your subscription began?

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  32. magazines by beowulf405 · · Score: 2

    I read a few magazines - why, because I don't like to read on small screens and like to read in bed, bathroom and other places. With the current cost of subscriptions you are missing a lot if you only read the free material on the Internet.
    I read: Wired, Time, Discover and Popular Science

  33. c't (German language) by bradley13 · · Score: 2

    The German magazine c't is the equivalent of the old Byte, as it existed 30 years ago in the US: Coverage of every techie hardware and software topic, written by people who actually know what they're talking about. Details, not just marketing fluff. For the the big company IT types, there's the sister publication i'X - not to my personal taste, but an equally good read for its target audience.

    I don't know of any equally good magazines in the English-speaking world.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  34. Strategy & Tactics, Proceedings by tmjva · · Score: 2

    I still get Strategy & Tactics because there is still a paper wargame in every issue. (And will the word 'wargame' ever get promoted into canon and pass the spell checker?)

    I get Proceedings because I have a navy interest.

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT