Slashdot Mirror


LinkedIn Invites Gone Wild: How To Keep Close With Exes and Strangers

sholto writes "An aggressive expansion strategy by LinkedIn has backfired spectacularly amid accusations of identity fraud. Users complained the social network sent unrequested invites from their accounts to contacts and complete strangers, often with embarrassing results. One man claimed LinkedIn sent an invite from his account to an ex-girlfriend he broke up with 12 years ago who had moved state, changed her surname and her email address. ... 'This ex-girlfriend's Linked in profile has exactly ONE contact, ME. My wife keeps getting messages asking 'would you like to link to (her)? You have 1 contact in common!,' wrote Michael Caputo, a literary agent from Massachussetts."

164 comments

  1. Fraud by schneidafunk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How is this not considered criminal activity? Could LinkedIn just be the target of a spoofing campaign? I have a hard time believing they could be so stupid.

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Fraud by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My previous employer made me get a linkedin account. It is the single most spammy thing I've ever signed up for.
      "Do you know former employee of customer of previous previous employer?" Fuck. Off.

    2. Re:Fraud by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I knew something was up when I got an invite to connect with a guy I used to work for - dude was a royal dickhole as an executive, bad enough that I left the company specifically because of his craptastic management style.

      Seeing an invite from him was enough to make my shudder in revulsion, and I'm sure the feeling would have been mutual.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Weird. I use LinkedIn both as a recruiting tool and as a connection tool with recruiters (I get between 3 and 5 calls a week from it) and I haven't seen anything of the sort.

      Maybe this is because I took the time to disable such notifications? I don't know but I'd be willing to bet that's the cause.

      LinkedIn is like any other social network; people must take the time to protect their online identities and communications from the tool.

    4. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Linkedin is exactly like the business culture it was meant to serve.

      Sleazy, smarmy, greedy, dishonest, sycophantic, treacherous, fraudulent. Simply the core values of American business.

    5. Re:Fraud by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1

      Considering this is the same LinkedIn that REQUIRES you to unsubscribe repeatedly from getting their spam invite reminders every time someone thinks they know you, I find it completely likely that they are so stupid.

    6. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not reasonable to have to protect my "online identity and communications" from a tool that I have purposefully decided NOT to use.

    7. Re:Fraud by Raistlin77 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Linkedin is exactly like the business culture it was meant to serve.

      Sleazy, smarmy, greedy, dishonest, sycophantic, treacherous, fraudulent. Simply the core values of global business.

      FTFY

    8. Re:Fraud by geirlk · · Score: 1

      Shame I'm out of mod points, I'd mod that insightful.

    9. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) If your employer tries to "make you get a linkedin account", change employ
      b) get some balls if you gave in
      c) delete said account, click ONCE on the next mail "Don't send me invites"
      d) If invites continue, sue their asses

    10. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kept getting spammed by them due to a former associate listing my email address with them as someone he knew and I got tired of marking them as spam, so I looked for the unsubscribe link required by the CAN-SPAM Act it it wasn't there. So I checked the site for contact info, contacted them and threatened action as allowed by the Act if they didn't add my email address to their blacklist as required by the said Act, and I got one response apologizing for the error and never heard from them again (that was about 3 years ago now).

    11. Re: Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an unrealistic comment. A job has certain requirements, for example maybe attending sales dinners, to recruit clients. A requirement to participate in LinkedIn or other social media is the same. If you don't like it, you are in the wrong job. Good luck with that, because it is the future.

    12. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How funny, they've also been recently spamming me with my ex-gf's linked-in account from about 15 years ago!

    13. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your friends could give out your phone number or e-mail address to any third party marketers they choose. This is no different than that, LI just makes it easier for them your 'friends' to do so.

      This is like having a contact use your e-mail address in a To: field instead of BCC:. *shrug*

    14. Re:Fraud by sribe · · Score: 2

      ...and I'm sure the feeling would have been mutual.

      Probably not, actually. People like that tend to have such restricted self-awareness and such finely-hone rationalization skills, that no matter how explicit you were when leaving that you hated his guts, he now thinks it was just a bad time for you and that you'd be glad to reconnect, having realized that you were being a bit overwrought at the time ;-)

    15. Re: Fraud by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      It's a sad future. I've been thinking about joining LinkedIn as the entertainment value of building a career path that is a secret mockery of capitalism wears thin (I have no social media presence currently). I'm not ready to cave yet...but I'm thinking about it :-(

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    16. Re: Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A job ends where my personal data begins. An employer can require me to attend a sales dinner (in paid worktime), but he cannot require me to add my personal data to an uncontrollable social network.

    17. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it for you.

    18. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's no way to change your preferences if you don't have an account. LinkedIn are relentless spammers, pure and simple. I'm not - ever - going get an account, but I'm going to continue to get invites, apparently, until the heat death of the universe. (Except, of course, I'll never see them again.)

    19. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird. I use LinkedIn both as a recruiting tool and as a connection tool with recruiters (I get between 3 and 5 calls a week from it) and I haven't seen anything of the sort.

      Maybe this is because I took the time to disable such notifications? I don't know but I'd be willing to bet that's the cause.

      LinkedIn is like any other social network; people must take the time to protect their online identities and communications from the tool.

      I get a lot of email from LinkedIn, despite having never used their site. Most of the profiles are obvious sham accounts, created by some kind of bot which mines publicly available information on the internet.
      Lately myself and several co-workers, all of us members in a particular email distribution list, have started getting LinkedIn invites from each other. Even though none of us has ever gone to the site, let alone signed up for it.

      I don't know if LinkedIn is doing this on their own, or if they hired some kind of Marketing or Recruitment company who is being under-handed. But what I do know, is that these emails ARE legitimately coming from LinkedIn (I have full direct access to the company mail server), and enough of them are obvious enough bullshit that anything from them is now auto-flagged as spam/phishing and moved to /null.

    20. Re:Fraud by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I have a hard time believing they could be so stupid.

      You have a hard time believing that a organization* could be how stupid? :p

      *Seriously, they're just machines and, as such, they tend to be at least as dumb as the dumbest components** they're assembled from.

      **If you ever get out and about one of these days, you know, in public... take a look around you (but do not, I repeat, do not turn on your television, as that will skew the results too far in the other direction; sure, we're dumb... but we're not that dumb... okay, yes, we are.) :p

    21. Re:Fraud by arth1 · · Score: 2

      No, those are not global core values.

      Not all businesses are in it to make as much profit as possible. Many older businesses in the old world are in it to provide continuity and a place to work, not just now, but decades down the road. Money is only a means to accomplish that.

    22. Re:Fraud by royallthefourth · · Score: 1

      While the miser is merely a capitalist gone mad, the capitalist is a rational miser.

    23. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been getting LinkedIn "requests" from people I'm already connected to

    24. Re: Fraud by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that, because it is the future.

      ... of the dystopian kind...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    25. Re:Fraud by phdscam · · Score: 1

      Makes total sense!

    26. Re: Fraud by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      If your contract includes promoting the company as part of your duties, I think you'll find they can.

    27. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happened to me. Former really bad boss thought he'd "improve my career" by inviting me to link him on LinkedIn.

      My response is not suitable for polite company. Not even for /., really.

      captch: deserter

    28. Re:Fraud by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Just stop, you are defending a shitty practice. Its great it works for you, /golfclap

      --
      Good-bye
    29. Re:Fraud by udippel · · Score: 2

      How is this not considered criminal activity? Could LinkedIn just be the target of a spoofing campaign? I have a hard time believing they could be so stupid.

      No. Over.
      I submitted a story some three weeks ago on exactly the same; miraculously (??) mine was finally not accepted. It was the sad and silly story of how 584 invites were sent, without me actually authorising the sending. Including to a good hundred addresses of people where I had applied for a job, but obtained a refusal. The funniest was my landlord, who got an invite on the same day when he received my resignation from the rental contract. Partially out of disgust with his 'business model'. And he knew I was disgusted, and he must have deemed me mad for resigning out of frustration and the same day asking him to become a member of my professional network!? Hahaha!
      My story also contained the result of my search through the Forum at LinkedIn, and I found a thread started one week earlier, with plenty of people asking to retract their invites for similar reasons. And no answer from LinkedIn, at least by then.

      Hahaha! I was totally tempted to send out to ALL my contacts (my list was harvested from my Gmail-account with my authorization). I spare everyone how I was snuggered into this - so partially I am to be blamed myself. But then I would have sent out a de-invite for some people that I had actually invited on purpose.

    30. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linkedin is exactly like the business culture it was meant to serve.

      Sleazy, smarmy, greedy, dishonest, sycophantic, treacherous, fraudulent. Simply the core values of humanity

      FTFY

      FTFTFY

    31. Re:Fraud by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1
      That attitude is why so few businesses in the world are 100 years old or older, they keep going out of business.

      The problem is, any business that takes your worldview gets run over by a business that takes profit at all costs.

      Walmart is a perfect example, many "old-school" businesses thought like you do, until they were all run out of business by Walmart who started selling below their costs.

    32. Re:Fraud by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      His self-awareness must be as dull as a lead brick, then - after I (and a handful of other critical folks) left, the CxO's threw a fit and sacked him in the hardest possible way.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    33. Re:Fraud by sribe · · Score: 1

      His self-awareness must be as dull as a lead brick, then - after I (and a handful of other critical folks) left, the CxO's threw a fit and sacked him in the hardest possible way.

      I've had literal screaming cursing matches with a boss-type, telling him what a miserable person he was, and sent email to the board of directors spelling out what was going on, and within months he thought we were old friends. It really is hard to get a grasp on the delusions inside the head of the narcissist, but it is a useful skill to cultivate...

    34. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or maybe because you use it a lot, LinkedIn does not feel the need to encourage you to use it. Perhaps they target the people who don't use it as much.

    35. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's like occasionally getting Facebook invites from old school bullies. So what if it's been decades, why would I want to have anything to do with you now?

    36. Re:Fraud by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I get a lot of email from LinkedIn, despite having never used their site. Most of the profiles are obvious sham accounts, created by some kind of bot which mines publicly available information on the internet.

      Are you sure they're really from LinkedIn? A lot of phishing emails use LinkedIn as a cover, which works really well, since LinkedIn itself is very spammy, though the genuine ones are either generally people you know, or if you're signed up a bunch of other useless spam which as of a few months ago started ignoring email preferences. I don't know if that was intentional, or if they've fixed it, but it was enough for me to say goodbye.

    37. Re:Fraud by Genda · · Score: 1

      There is a whole roving band of hominid primates lumbering around out there, and if you put a gun to their collective heads and asked them to distinguish expedience and moral rectitude, you'd just have to shoot, because they haven't a friggin' clue. Strangely enough, these people end up lawyers and judges and political representatives and the heads of companies and banks. I don't know why that is, except maybe people with a conscience seem to get bogged down properly disposing of the dead bodies and using them like cord wood just doesn't seem to pop into the heads of more decent folks.

      I could point fingers at the likes of Justice Scalia (now there are a couple divergent words that are uncomfortably close), or the 45 professional politicians who last night blocked legislation their constituency agrees with at the level of 90%. The Pew Report said the only issues with higher agreement in the U.S. are Abraham Lincoln and Jesus Christ. Mother Teresa only scored an 83%. I'm not even saying we should have blanket legislation preventing the sale of guns to criminals and the mentally ill, I'm kind of hoping that wouldn't need a tally of hands. So many brilliant and magnificent people in Boston, running into harms way to save others, to help others. Watching people CYAing their way through life shouldn't be offensive. Its so common. It just seems such a waste of breathing, in the face of what people are capable of. LinkedIn, shame on you. You want to be very careful. You shave enough corners, and what you end up with is lumpy, round and brown, and we all know what to do with stuff like that.

    38. Re: Fraud by Genda · · Score: 1

      I was just reading about a Southeast Asian coffee made from coffee berries passed through the digestive tract of an Asian palm civet. It's called Kopi Luwak. Recently to make more, people have begun breeding and penning large numbers of civets and force feeding them coffee berries to increase the yield. They are endangering the wild population.

      I'm wondering if common people won't envy that cat in a few years.

    39. Re:Fraud by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      I am dealing with a woman who is in court because she has a restraining order and LinkedIn emailed her ex-husband with something that appears to be from her. She knew nothing about it. He is accusing her of contacting him and violating the restraining order. After looking at the email, I can understand their point - it does appear to be from her.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    40. Re:Fraud by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      ... within months he thought we were old friends
      Nothing gets the point across like a surprise evisceration.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    41. Re:Fraud by sribe · · Score: 1

      Nothing gets the point across like a surprise evisceration.

      I swear to you, I don't think that would have done it ;-)

    42. Re:Fraud by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I have a hard time believing they could be so stupid.

      I don't have a problem believing it.

      I'm seriously considering shutting down my Linked-In account because of the amount of idiots using it who are stupid enough to send me recruitment spam, despite me saying very explicitly in my CV that I'm not looking for work. Way to prove that you don't read the CVs of people you try to sell your recruitment services to!

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Not Random by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linkedin found the connection somehow - maybe from your gmail account?

    1. Re:Not Random by hattig · · Score: 1

      Why would you ever let any social network trawl your email accounts (and other social networks)?

      I'm annoyed that I can't "facet" my Facebook account into family, friends and work, and hide things from each of these. Google's thing can do that.

      Last thing I want is exes popping up again.

    2. Re:Not Random by TWX · · Score: 1

      That would explain one linked-in invite that I keep getting. Funny enough, the guy works as an exec for a company that a friend of mine works at.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:Not Random by mpoulton · · Score: 1

      I'm annoyed that I can't "facet" my Facebook account into family, friends and work, and hide things from each of these.

      You can. That's what "lists" are for. You add people to lists, and set default privacy settings for the lists.

      --
      I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
    4. Re:Not Random by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Yeah, then your lists disappear during an update, or won't load when you are trying to add someone.

    5. Re:Not Random by marsu_k · · Score: 2

      No browser would allow that, it would be completely retarded from a security viewpoint.

    6. Re:Not Random by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Well, they are definitely doing something shady to link users.

    7. Re:Not Random by marsu_k · · Score: 1

      Oh, of that I have no doubt - and the fact that you don't allow access to your email account(s) doesn't mean someone you know and is on LinkedIn wouldn't do so. But (thankfully) web pages can't access other tabs in browsers.

    8. Re:Not Random by TwineLogic · · Score: 2

      What they are doing is finding you in another person's email (which they voluntarily submitted to LinkedIn), recognizing your address(es), and then suggesting to you that you know this person who has your email address in the contacts they uploaded.

    9. Re:Not Random by steveg · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I have gotten several "invites" from people I have never heard of. I've also gotten invitations from some people I *do* know. There's always a slight tinge of guilt when I ignore them (especially when I got one from my sister) but not enough to cause me to respond.

      Other than the invitations I get on a regular basis, I've never had anything to do with LinkedIn. I've no particular interest in it.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
  3. People are using the address book feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    From what I can gather, people are using the "upload your contact list" / "connect to your email account" feature, without realizing that it automatically sends out invites to your contacts. I'm pretty sure it spells that out quite plainly, though; at least I vaguely recall that it did last time I decided not to use the feature.

    1. Re:People are using the address book feature by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      I'd like to file an exception to your hypothesis - I always left that stupid thing off, and yet I got an odd invite from a guy I positively detested (both as a manager and otherwise)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:People are using the address book feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait... what? It's the person who does the inviting that has used the feature, not the invitee. The other guy still probably had you on his contact list when he decided to upload it to LinkedIn.

    3. Re:People are using the address book feature by joe_frisch · · Score: 2

      You may have been in his email list, or possibly both of you in a 3rd person's list. Has anyone absolutely verified that they received an invite from someone who didn't send one?

    4. Re:People are using the address book feature by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      That would make sense... I was reading it slightly backwards. :)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    5. Re:People are using the address book feature by obarel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure you're right.

      I hardly pay attention to most of what I read online, especially when I'm on LinkedIn (I'm trying not to look at adverts, so I miss the content as well).

      I found myself once entering my LinkedIn password into some "password" input box, which, as I wasn't paying much attention, I thought was LinkedIn's "your session has expired". However, it rejected the password, which made me look again. I was entering my password into the "we've got your email address, now just give us the password" box. As I have different passwords for different things, no problem. But I'm sure that some people use the same password for everything, and suddenly LinkedIn sends an email to every contact on their gmail account.

    6. Re:People are using the address book feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it do that automatically now? When I used it, I had to pick through the 100 addresses it scraped from a particular email to get the dozen or so I was looking for.
      On the other hand, I have a college acquaintance who is both so inept and desperate for a job that he's started trying to connect to every connection of his connections. I've got a form letter ready to the effect of "I went to college with Rob; I do not recall having introduced you to him.

    7. Re:People are using the address book feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get these kinds of things to my support@ address. Thing is, I run a porn site. So when I get these kind of automated invites I just accept them, thus publicly linking the person's real identity to a porn site (containing some pretty sick fetish content).

      Maybe they will think twice about inviting everyone they have ever emailed to a social network next time?

    8. Re:People are using the address book feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " (I'm trying not to look at adverts, so I miss the content as well)."
      Makes me wonder if you've ever really visited the site in your life, let alone stopped to think how to use it, before judging it as worthless.

    9. Re:People are using the address book feature by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      I met an old acquaintance in a deli that I hadn't seen since grade school. When I got back to my office, my Linked page suggested I might know this person. I looked out at the parking lot to see if there was a LinkedIn van following me! That was creepy. Then I figured out that the person must have looked at my profile, and that was enough to trigger it.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    10. Re:People are using the address book feature by udippel · · Score: 1

      From what I can gather, people are using the "upload your contact list" / "connect to your email account" feature, without realizing that it automatically sends out invites to your contacts. I'm pretty sure it spells that out quite plainly, though; at least I vaguely recall that it did last time I decided not to use the feature.

      Yep. That's what it says. I for one had selected some 7 contacts (me stupid had allowed access to my address book). Carefully selected. A give-away was already, that there was no 'deselect all'; only 'select all', and I had automatically 153 contacts pre-selected. What a fun, without a 'deselect all'. So I deselected some 146, one by one. 7 left. And me scrolling to double-check if they were the good ones. So I selected 7. Do you know how many were sent? 584.

      Another give-away of LinkedIn malicious undertaking:
      1. I never had to confirm those invites being sent.
      2. (Worse) There is no way to retract invites not yet being opened or answered. No 'cancel all my invites'

      Now it's your turn to show any 'best practices' by LinkedIn to me.

    11. Re:People are using the address book feature by alvarogmj · · Score: 1

      In addition to that, take into account that there are some mail clients (both web and desktop) that add email addresses to contact list when you send a mail (or when you send x number of emails) to them.

      I hate that feature. I hate the mindless "send this crap to everybody you know" features. I hate it more when people uses distribution lists from work to join social networks, and everybody gets spammed by the site.

  4. I have no trouble believing this by gaudior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    LinkedIn has always seemed shady to me. I joined a few years ago, and got inundated with requests from people who seemed to do nothing with their time but offer to show me how to accumulate linked-in followers. My ex and I were simultaneously suggested to each other as contacts, probably because we still share some friends in common. Neither of us requested anything. I think the whole thing is just another social-media wank-fest, like twitter or google+.

  5. Been wondering myself. by wcrowe · · Score: 2

    I've been wondering about that for a while now. I get LinkedIn invites that seem unlikely. They have all the hallmarks of some automated process unknown to the user.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Been wondering myself. by mrbester · · Score: 1

      All the invites I receive are unlikely as I'm not on LinkedIn. Straight to spam they go...

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    2. Re:Been wondering myself. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      I would get introduced to family of a headhunter I used 8 years ago once.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:Been wondering myself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I got two notes from Linked in that were "invites" from a parent of my daughter's friend. We casually knew these people as our daughter's hung out together in High School and we would see them at orchestra events, etc. We never planned anything with them and now that our kids go to different colleges, we haven't seen these people in over a year. Yet I got two invites to LinkedIn from them. I am almost positive it is due to them allowing LinkedIn access to their contact list (as I had emailed them once or twice with some links to pictures or some such). There is just no way they would have invited me to LinkedIn purposely. After that I set a gmail filter rule - straight to delete if it comes from LinkedIn.

    4. Re:Been wondering myself. by DeBaas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Those are probably not from Linkedin. Spammers are sending mail that looks linkedin in now as well. Gmail seems very good in separating real Linkedin and spam looking like Linkedin.

      My issue with Linkedin is that I keep on getting spam from them with an offer for a free month of premium access. Note to Linkedin: if I have to supply credit card details: IT AIN'T FREE!!

         

      --
      ---
    5. Re:Been wondering myself. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      All the invites I receive are unlikely as I'm not on LinkedIn. Straight to spam they go...

      ehm. linkedin - or rather a person using it - sends invites to people on your contact lists if you want to or potentials. if some friend of yours who has your email on their gmail or whatever account they're linking with linkedin just forward presses through it then it's likely you're getting an invite(to join the service and hook up).

      me, I haven't used linkedin in 6 years or something. badly employed people keep telling me I should get back on.. but eh, why would I want spam from wanabe headhunters who don't have gigs to offer even? as it is one is much more likely to get employed through facebook contacts than from linkedin. seriously - the fact that linkedin is brandad as business/professional oriented makes it useless for actual business/professional hookups. soo... I haven't had much reason to jump their hoops to get on the account I have there which is linked to an email account I never use, so if anyone finds that profile they can see that I've abandoned it x years ago - if they search for it for some good reason, then they know that I haven't actually been totally inactive and unemployed for the past 6 years.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  6. Always been aggravating by Quirkz · · Score: 4, Informative

    They've always been aggressive and aggravating, as far as I'm concerned. When a family member signed up with them I got a request. And another. And another. And they kept coming. I finally followed a link and told them to shut up and stop bothering me, but then another associate signed up and it started all over again. I can understand one invite, but they sent far more than was warranted, or could be considered reasonable or polite. I refuse to use them, not just because of the grudge, but also because I don't want them spamming friends or family based on my registration.

    1. Re:Always been aggravating by Tom · · Score: 1

      aggravating is putting it nicely, I'd equate them to cancer - once you're in their database, it's almost impossible to get rid of them.

      I never had an account, but people I know apparently had. When it started to get annoying, I told them to stop, then I told them to fuck off, then I told them "stop or lawyer" - that apparently finally worked.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    2. Re:Always been aggravating by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Heh, I opened a FB account about 3yrs ago, used it once to talk to someone I know. Every second day since then I have received an "you have X friend requests" email.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  7. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is exactly why I never let Linkedin access my contacts even though it bitches every single time I log on. Think it's time to delete my account now, it served its purpose and I'm employed.

  8. The usual sloppy reporting by jtara · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While I find the constant barrage of "do you know" messages annoying, it's pretty clear to me what they are: a message from LinkedIn (NOT the person you might or might not know) asking if you might know this person, and sugesting that you invite THEM.

    Once you click through on one of these, you get the standard LinkedIn invitation request. You are asked to make a selection as to how you know this person. If you check "I don't know this person", then you need to know their email address in order to complete the invitation. AS WITH ANY Linked-In invitation.

    The annoying messages are NOT invitations, though, you AREN'T automatically connected by responding to them (the other person would have to approve) and they AREN'T sent from the other person's account. It's pretty clear they are sent by LinkedIn, trying to drum-up more connections.

    1. Re:The usual sloppy reporting by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Sloppy reporting, or just that other people have had different experiences with Linkedin? Isn't it possible, that while you've only gotten "do you know" messages, that the people interviewed in TFA have in fact had invites sent out on their behalf but without their knowledge or approval? TFA says that users are reporting that Linkedin is placing invite restrictions on their accounts for sending out too many invites to people they don't know when they swear they haven't sent them.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    2. Re:The usual sloppy reporting by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      It's obvious to me too, but I'm a computer nerd and odds are you are too. It irritates me to think people not familiar with computers think *I* am the one spamming them.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    3. Re:The usual sloppy reporting by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that's true. I keep getting messages supposedly from people asking me to "endorse" there experience in one way or another. But they are from people that wouldn't ask me such a thing.

      Is there any actual point to LinkedIn? Does anyone actually ever do any networking that way? I haven't noticed any in the years that I've lazily had an account. It's about time I shut the account down.

    4. Re:The usual sloppy reporting by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, it does have a point. That's how the Google recruiter found me, without me soliciting them first.

      It's much like any other social media site, but it does have the one saving grace that you can actually find jobs with it. Thus, it is the only social media site that I put any effort into whatsoever.

      Still, just like any other social media site, you would be a fool to give them anything but your most tailored information, and certainly not your raw contact list.

    5. Re:The usual sloppy reporting by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I don't think they're talking about the "do you know" messages that everyone knows. They're talking about automatic invites to connect with someone else.

      For instance, I was a Teaching Assistant when I was in grad school up until a few years ago, so hundreds of my former students have my e-mail address. As those students have been graduating and signing up for LinkedIn, one of the first things it does is ask them if they want to connect their Gmail contacts to LinkedIn, and many of them do that, resulting in LinkedIn sending out invites to all of their contacts, including me. This is different than what you've described, since in my case, it's an actual invitation that I can choose to Accept or Ignore, as opposed to your case, where you're being baited into initiating the connection yourself.

      From what the summary says (who reads the article?), it sounds like they've expanded this practice in some way, perhaps by sending out those sorts of invites on behalf of the user, rather than merely sending out the "do you know" messages that we're both familiar with.

    6. Re:The usual sloppy reporting by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      I kept getting weird endorsements, like an endorsement for "Perl" from someone who needs help to find the ON button on his computer, and certainly has no idea what Perl is or why I should be endorsed for it.
      So I added a new skill to my profile: "Cromulence". Now I can catch all the blind endorsements from people who don't know what they are clicking on.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  9. There's an easy solution... by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Funny

    have a three-some!

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  10. I stopped them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get these anymore. I get spam email which are dupes of LinkedIn emails, but the names are bogus and the links are all wrong, so I know they're not genuine.

    What I did to stop stupid spam?

    I put in my profile in clear words, that if someone contacts me without having any connections, or from an area far away from where I live, especially if they claim to represent a recruitment firm, I will promptly report them as a spammer. I flagged several accounts, and I haven't had any stupid requests from LinkedIn in months.

    I still occasionally get the ones I would expect from people who have several connections in common, or current/former co-workers, but those are fine to me, as I understand that that's what the system is for.

  11. simple solution by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    :0
    * H ?? ^From: .*@linkedin\.com
    /dev/null
    Linkedin is to employment as pakistani callcenters are to recruiting. I consider it another "social" site into which people excrete personal details and act perplexed when they receive an influx of redplum junkettes and robocalls. i save my "professional networking" for SCALE, LISA, and pertanent mailing lists.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mailing whaaa?

      As a subscriber of one gazillion university lists, I say: get rid of those spam machines!

    2. Re:simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i save my "professional networking" for SCALE, LISA, and pertanent mailing lists.

      Which one?

      Acronym Definition
      SCALE Student Coalition for Action in Literacy Education
      SCALE Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation
      SCALE Secondary Collegiate Articulated Learning Experience
      SCALE South Carolina Association of Law Enforcement Explorers
      SCALE Shuttle Coherent Atmospheric LIDAR Experiment (NASA)
      SCALE Short-term Commitment and Long-term Estimate
      SCALE System Characteristics and Assurance Level Evaluation (IEEE)
      SCALE Sustainable Community based Approaches for Livelihoods Enhancement (India)
      SCALE Specialization in Culture and Language Education

    3. Re:simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it's highly unlikely that nimbius meant this version, there's also:

      Somerville Center for Adult Learning and Education

    4. Re:simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SCALE -> perhaps Southern California Linux Expo.

      A large community/volunteer run Open Source conference held once a year in Los Angeles.

      more info:
      www.socallinuxexpo.org
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_California_Linux_Expo

      SCALE 11x had 90 presenters, 2300+ attendees, ran for 3 days, covered all sorts of Open Source related topics.. full price was only $70 for attendees.

      SCALE 12x coming Feb 21-22-23 ( Fri, Sat, Sun ) 2012 at the LAX Hilton.

      Come join us. We would love to see more people interested in Open Source / EFF to join us

  12. LinkedIn is annoying by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I attend an AI group in Boston (for about two years ongoing) and I've learned to not give out my E-mail for this very reason.

    Giving an E-mail address results in them entering it into LinkedIn, which results in me being spammed forever by that system. People I've never heard of send messages "I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn" (some store owner in a distant city).

    The message has a convenient opt-out link, whose page is hilariously ambiguous:

    "You're receiving these emails because a LinkedIn member invited you to become a part of their professional network. By clicking the "Unsubscribe" button, you will stop receiving these emails"

    Two checkboxes below are labelled "Invitations to connect" and "Reminders to connect".

    It took me awhile to realize that you have to *check* the boxes to stop receiving E-mails, instead of *uncheck* the boxes which is how pretty-much all other sites handle it.

    I've never seen a compelling need for this LinkedIn service. Sure, if a member could manage their contacts effectively it might be useful, but the system auto-encourages bigger and more comprehensive webs... which are at the same time less and less useful.

    My impression is that many of the people on the site are "salesmen" types, who think contact circles indicate how impressive they are. Professional networks just for the purpose of having professional networks.

    Thanks, but no thanks. The address-book in my E-mail client works just fine. It even lets me add notes about the person - where I met them, what they do, &c.

    It also doesn't hold my contact info up for everyone to see.

    1. Re:LinkedIn is annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're into AI development, post on slashdot, and don't know how to set up an e-mail rule to delete messages from LinkedIn that apparently annoy you so much ?

      Your intelligence project is doomed.

    2. Re:LinkedIn is annoying by Inda · · Score: 1

      "results in me being spammed forever by that system"

      I've never been a user of LinkedIn and I was constantly spammed about buying carpet. Carpet from a supplier 200 miles away who I'd never had any contact with.

      So I fired off a short email to LinkedIn and they told me that I should be happy that people want to do business with me.

      In the end, LinkedIn blocked my email address and now I'm happy. Get them to block your email address - they have processes to deal with it.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  13. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linked in & facebook are targets of their own mediocrity. If there's a way for these companies to f@*k up with your private information, they're working on it. They harvest human stupidity for the idiocracy.

  14. How it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I guess most people aren't aware of how this actually works. Notice that if you visit LinkedIn on a computer that you normally use, it already knows who you are without having to sign in. So when you think you are casually using LinkedIn to look up an old girlfriend or co-worker that you detest, it logs that activity. Then it WAITS A FEW DAYS AND THEN ASKS THAT PERSON IF THEY KNOW YOU. Yes, it is that creepy.

    1. Re:How it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why wasn't this modded up??

    2. Re:How it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, I think you're right.

    3. Re:How it works by chooks · · Score: 1

      That happened to me with my ex-girlfriend. All of a sudden she popped up on my "You may know..." list. Needless to say, it was duly ignored. Her step-dad also showed up one day as well...Not sure if he looked me up or if she used his computer.

      Either way, my wife and I had a good laugh about it. My main point to her was that it was kind of cool knowing how these things work (an underlying machine learning algorithm to group things, I would guess). She is glad she married a nerd.

      --
      -- The Genesis project? What's that?
    4. Re:How it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I clear my cookies out every time I close my browser.

  15. I though those were some kind of spam by Animats · · Score: 1

    I've been getting what I thought were phony LinkedIn invites. I thought they were some kind of spam, and set up a mail filter to drop them. Is LinkedIn itself sending those?

    1. Re:I though those were some kind of spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is my problem with LinkedIn. There are fake LinkedIn invites and messages that are sent and there are real ones as well. Because they are so spammy, it is hard to tell the difference without scrutinizing the headers to see if the chain goes back to LinkedIn or somewhere else. Luckily, I have a better solution for me. Since I wait until the message is almost a week old before I do anything about it, the real LinkedIn messages show, at the bottom, that I have messages in the 20s or so in my inbox and the fake ones are in the low single digits. The ratio of fake to real invites is around 2:1 and has been for some time, but I have to have my work email address publicly posted in such a way that it is a valid mailto link.

    2. Re:I though those were some kind of spam by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 1

      Most of the spam I currently get is in the form of fake LinkedIn messages, so you're probably right.

      Gmails filters them all out while letting real ones through. It's easy to check since I use a different address for LinkedIn that forwards to my gmail account.

      I sometimes get link requests from recruiters who claim they've worked with me in the past. I don't know if there's some advantage to that over just asking to link to me (other than trying to fool me).

  16. It's that stupid find contacts I bet ... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Informative

    So many of these sites do that "hey, give us your username and password and we'll find people for you".

    No way no how would I give any of them my password for my email account to sift through and find people. If I want to put information in there, I'll do it myself.

    Though, it wouldn't surprise me if they used some other annoying mechanism to do these invites the user didn't do.

    Like all social networking, your contacts and friends are extremely valuable to them. They want to expand it as much as possible, and might get a little overzealous in doing that.

    As it is, I periodically get invites from people I don't know in LinkedIn, but if I don't know you or haven't worked with you, it's not happening.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  17. maybe you could try turning off email notification by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Informative

    Second hit for "linkedin email preferences." You're on Slashdot, and you don't know how to do this?

    http://help.linkedin.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/67

    Email notifications can be added, changed, or stopped in the Email Preferences section of the Settings page [...] The following options are available:

            Individual Email
            Daily Digest Email
            Weekly Digest Email
          No Email

  18. Linked in has gone way downhill by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Early on, it was a good way to reconnect with old friends and the groups actually had decent discussions. Most groups have devolved into a few people arguing amongst themselves (one even has become one person talking to themselves)and a place for people to self promote. For a while there many posts I saw were form bogus job offers and SEO spammers. I still use it to search for old friends but if I get a request from an unknown person I refuse it.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  19. Hope by gatesstillborg · · Score: 1

    The snake will always end up eating its tail. They will always find enough rope to hang themselves, etc.

  20. Block their emails by bobjr94 · · Score: 1

    I had never signed with them up but after getting email invites almost daily to several email accounts, and unsubscribing many times, I finally added them to my blocked senders list. The people I get these invites from I already know on facebook and other sites anyway.

  21. Great! by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

    Now to convince my girlfriend that I wasn't looking through my ex's Facebook photo albums!

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  22. This happened to me as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was wondering what was going on...I added a few people from my contact list and then I started getting all these acceptances from everyone in my contact list along with some others who might have somehow been on an email cc list or just a random stranger.

  23. "endorse" is a different feature by jtara · · Score: 4, Informative

    "endorse" is a completely different, new, feature.

    The endorsement messages do not come from the individuals you might endorse. Again, these are generated by LinkedIn, and the language makes that clear. Did you actually read them?

    LinkedIn is asking you to validate that one of your connections "knows" some skill that they have listed.

    I like the feature myself. It's meant as a bit of a BS filter, to give some credibility to people's claims. If you've got 100 connections and say you know "x", and nobody endorses you for "x", there's a good chance you're just making it up.

    It's actually fun. Whenever I go on LinkedIn (which isn't very often) I'll plink-off a few, knowing that I'm helping people I've worked with validate their skills. If I worked with a person who was doing "x" when I worked with them, and I'm asked to endorse them for "x", I endorse them for "x". If I know they are BSing or simply don't know, maybe because their experience with "x" was later, then I pass it by. It's the way it's supposed to work. (There is no negative endorsement.)

    Obviously, though, it will take time for the system to work, since it is a fairly new feature.

    Does anybody use LinkedIn? I do. It's replaced my resume'. However, I don't follow the standard resume' advice to keep it to recent history. I've been a developer for 30+ years. Every job I've ever had is listed.

    1. Re:"endorse" is a different feature by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The endorsement messages do not come from the individuals you might endorse. Again, these are generated by LinkedIn, and the language makes that clear. Did you actually read them?

      Here's one, only the names have been changed to protect the innocent. Needless to say there's no chance Roland wrote this.

      "Roland Rat is requesting an endorsement for work

      Dear Basil,
      I'm sending this to ask you for a brief recommendation of my work that I can include in my LinkedIn profile. If you have any questions, let me know.

      Thanks in advance for helping me out.

      -Roland Rat"

      LinkedIn are liars.

    2. Re:"endorse" is a different feature by jtara · · Score: 1

      OK, yes, that is different. You can request an endorsement as well. That's different from the "does so-and-so know "x"" messgaes.

      So, did you ask Roland Rat if he made an endorsement request?

    3. Re:"endorse" is a different feature by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Endorse isn't a new feature, I endorsed one of my ex-colleagues who went freelancing years ago. What is new, is that it has become part of the general fake spaminess of LinkedIn that caused me to close my account a few months back.

  24. Rare success story! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without either of us attempting to contact each other, in any way - especially not Linked In, me and an old girlfriend became connected on Linked In. Fortunately, this was a really good thing. Both divorced, both have really good memories of our time together and now stay in regular contact. The only problem being that we live on different continents!

  25. Re:maybe you could try turning off email notificat by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Second hit for "linkedin email preferences." You're on Slashdot, and you don't know how to do this?

    If he only joined LinkedIn because he was forced to, I can understand not caring enough to customize it to his liking. Especially since "his liking" would be "not having it at all". In that case, getting rid of the unwanted email by sending it to the spam bucket is a perfectly rational solution.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  26. Linkedin is no better than Facebook by Sydin · · Score: 2

    Both of them are hungry for all the personal data they can get their hands on, so that they can turn around and sell anything to you, and sell you to anything. The problem is that while I'm completely in control of my choice to have a Facebook account (read: I don't have a facebook account), my most recent employer requires me to have a LinkedIn profile. Moreover, a lot of tech firms won't even consider you if they can't find you on LinkedIn. It's a horrible site, but unfortunately everybody expects you to play the game.

    1. Re:Linkedin is no better than Facebook by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2

      . . . my most recent employer requires me to have a LinkedIn profile. Moreover, a lot of tech firms won't even consider you if they can't find you on LinkedIn. It's a horrible site, but unfortunately everybody expects you to play the game.

      I saw a story in Wired this week about that. I just can't do it, though. I was on LinkedIn for a while, saw no value to it. I really didn't want to know about people that I didn't like in the first place getting promoted. I killed my account a while back. If it hurts my prospects, so be it.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    2. Re:Linkedin is no better than Facebook by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      The one thing that makes LinkedIn not quite as bad as Facebook is that what's public on LinkedIn is exactly what you want to be public: Your professional accomplishments.

      By contrast, Facebook wants you to give up information that's regularly stuff I'd want to be kept private, such as the names of all my ex's and exactly what I did with each of them.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:Linkedin is no better than Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has to be an American thing, here in Scandinavia Linkedin is about as mandatory as QR codes on your resume. (I'm a twentysomething working in energy research).

  27. My question is how necessary is LI these days? by nblender · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I still don't have a LI account (nor facebook nor twitter, nor g+)... I'm being told that being on LinkedIn is more or less obligatory if I want to have a reasonable chance of not being ignored by a hiring manager or HR drone. I'm being told this by colleagues and friends, a few of whom are hiring managers. I've been operating under the assumption that my reputation is enough to get me hired (as has been the case for at least 25 years) but what I'm hearing now is that if I don't show up on LinkedIn, my resume gets tossed.. I'm offended by the very idea and like to console myself that I probably don't want to work for anyone who filters resumes this way... Unfortunately, I'm approaching my sunset years and may not be able to afford to restrict my employment opportunities should I suddenly find myself unemployed.

    1. Re:My question is how necessary is LI these days? by Geek_Cop · · Score: 1

      I didn't want one either, but unfortunately I keep meeting more and more people that have found their next job using it.

    2. Re:My question is how necessary is LI these days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are recruiters that will toss your resume if they can't find information about you, but not all. I know several younger generation recruiters, including my sister-in-law, and they do use it heavily nowadays.

      However, there is a value to it if you know how to restrict from the features that do not add value. The features that don't add value are individual to you however. I know several people who are involved with small businesses and startups in a marketing function, and many small companies want to know how social media savvy you are, so LinkedIn can be useful there. I'm an operations guy myself, and I have my LinkedIn page mimic my resume pretty closely; it's taking the place of Monster now. In terms of contacts, I add every person that i have met and worked with individually and refuse accepting people whom I've never met face to face; the nice thing there is you can tag them so 2-3 years down the road when you're looking to change jobs or need someone for some random project, you can look up your LinkedIn contacts and remember who you met and why, and there's your opening to call them for their assistance. In addition, if I do an exceptional job I ask someone to write a recommendation for me related to that job; their recommendation is usually glowing when it's near the time I did a great job and yet through LinkedIn it stays forever glowing; I don't have to have them dredge up that review 3-5 years later as a recruiter can already see it. Also, recruiters are now finding me for my LinkedIn resume, which means jobs are coming to me; not that i'm in the market looking but it never hurts.

      I basically use it as an online, organic resume. I keep it up to date with various projects so that way when I'm looking to position myself for a promotion or a job change, it's already up to date. That matters to me because I'm in my early 30's and have decades of work ahead of me; for someone in the latter part of their career perhaps not so much, but it's worth looking into to see how you can utilize it.

    3. Re:My question is how necessary is LI these days? by radarskiy · · Score: 0

      You forgot to tell us that you also do not have a television.

    4. Re:My question is how necessary is LI these days? by Micahsa · · Score: 2

      I was contacted by a recruiter specifically due to my LI profile. We talked, she connected me with the HR manager at the firm I'm at now, and when I asked about sending in a resume the HR manager responded "we have your LinkedIn profile which looks pretty current. Just update that if there's something else we should know."

      I was hired with 30 days.

      So for all the talk of spam and such, I am religious about updating my profile, accomplishments, and ensuring my network includes those who would be beneficial in a professional sense.

    5. Re:My question is how necessary is LI these days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its is a despicable and lazy practice, this is known.

      You will just have to bend over, drop your pants and take it from LinkedIn. Just hope like hell it uses protection, you *will* catch something nasty from it.

    6. Re:My question is how necessary is LI these days? by nblender · · Score: 1

      I have a number of televisions, TYVM. Complete with XBMC, Sickbeard, Couch Potato, and IceFilms... I'm not a luddite, I'm just not a social-networking idiot.

    7. Re:My question is how necessary is LI these days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This needs to be modded up, this is exactly my experience.

  28. I was going to just abandon it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just going to abandon LinkedIn, but I realized that I had actually been actively recruited (Stalked politely) by my current employer and would not have landed the awesomest job ever had I not had one...

    So, I just put up with the spammyness by refusing any request of anyone I don't know personally.

    Posting anon because ... just because.

  29. Mark as spam by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

    It is spam; mark it as spam.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  30. LinkedIn's problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've thought for some time that LinkedIn has serious problems. The big problem is what to do when you get invites from people who aren't in your field. It started with real estate agents. Then friends or people with whom I exchanged business cards. Left unchecked, this reduces the value of the network. Bigger is not better. The end result is a reduction to one datum: "everybody is connected". We already knew that, so such a database adds nothing to our knowledge.

    That might be by design or accident. Perhaps some people are annoyed by the privacy implications of LinkedIn and see filling it with noise as a way to make it more difficult for people to really figure out who their connections are. That can be defeated by using some sort of crawler that checks to see if you actually worked with the person, recommended them, etc. which brings us to another problem.

    LinkedIn is always bothering me. Especially since IPO it's become more spammy. They're desperately trying to make you interact with it, because they need you to visit frequently so they can make money.

    I'm sure it's being gamed too. It appears to be doing well now; but there's definitely trouble a brewin' there. It was a cool idea to focus on professional connections, but ultimately it may be just another social networking fad. We'll go back to simply, you know, talking to people we really know. I know I wouldn't miss it.

  31. Stap my vitals! by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 0

    Stap my vitals! Jolly rotten I say.
    Still I hope he got to shag the old gal. You know, for old times sake and all that rot. And, of course, to sort of compensate for the troubles he went through. I mean, the old spouse will never believe him anyway, so he might as well. And with considerable vim I say!

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  32. Yahoo did this too by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1
    Yahoo did something similar to this a few (four? five?) years ago when it was also trying to roll out a "social media" flavor-of-the-year. When you logged in, you'd see a sidebar (on the right, if I remember correctly) saying "XYZZ has been trying to reach you." Now, remember kids, this is on the yahoo web-mail page when you log in, so it's not just spam mailed by someone's account which was hijacked by a virus. It was actually a notification on the web user interface for their webmail. I ended up getting a few random junk mails from people whom I'd emailed two years prior to that and had no interest in contacting anymore (bad middle-school friendships gone awry...) and who decided to restalk me probably based on yahoo telling them that I'd been interested in reaching/connecting with them.

    I can't remember if it was Yahoo Buzz or not...

  33. But others do give that permission. by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    Maybe *you* haven't given Linkedin permission to scrape your address book, but someone else did. If those other people have the email address you use for Linkedin in their contact list, Linkedin will still find a relationship between you two and suggest a connection. The right to be left alone should really apply to mail and other internet databases too, no opt out or anything, but default. Unless a company or person has explicit permission from you yourself, they should not be allowed to keep your information in their databases, regardless how they got it in the first place.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  34. Re:maybe you could try turning off email notificat by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

    It was right after I was hired, and didn't think I'd be spammed to hell and back. I've since deleted the account.

  35. Your Ex-Girlfriend Has Exactly One Contact - You? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> ex-girlfriend's Linked in profile has exactly ONE contact, ME.

    Yeah...I'd be worried about my wife talking to her too. Either this relationship ain't over, or it's time to unfriend this stalker.

  36. LI isn't that bad! by flarb936 · · Score: 2

    I use LinkedIn like I used to use Plaxo--for an up to date contact list. Whenever I get someone's business card, I add them on LinkedIn and throw the card away. I don't see what the big deal is. I set the email prefs so LI never emails me ever, so it doesn't bug me. I will say I've accidentally sent out a lot of invites to random strangers because if you browse the "the people you may know" list on the iPad you can easily accidentally tap a profile instead of swiping to scroll which sends an invite out.

    --
    ralphbarbagallo.com
    1. Re:LI isn't that bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, I do the same. It's how I've been employed for the last 8 years, also.
      They contact me, and I choose which I'd like.

  37. Re:maybe you could try turning off email notificat by antdude · · Score: 1

    Apparently, he can't read well based on his /. name. ;)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  38. Re:maybe you could try turning off email notificat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, I don't have such an option. Probably because I'm not a member on their site, and never have been. But there's an account using my name and the scant bit of information in my Company Email signature, which spams all kinds of other people all the damn time.

    Quit making excuses for them. They use spam and sham accounts to make their numbers look better. At this point, if you apply for a job at my company and put down LinkedIn, you're going right into the trashcan.

  39. LinkedIn is Creepier than Facebook by Sir+Holo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've had a LinkedIn account for a decade or so. During most of that time, it was just a place to post my CV details, and to "link" to other professionals that I know. No longer.

    Now, when I go to LinkedIn, they suggest numerous people as "People You May Know." Fine, let's take a look:

    * my psychiatrist (who even knows that I have one!?!)
    * the guy who painted my condo five years ago
    * an ex-roommate from 11 years ago
    * an acupuncturist who I used three times, in another city, eight years ago
    * a casual acquaintance from 10 years ago (who may have sent me an invite)
    * someone whose only connection to me is a one-time dance, and is a "FB friend." No emails between us
    * a guy I shared an office with, but who was a jerk, so we never exchanged emails
    * a guy who formerly lived in my condo complex
    * a guy who was the grad-school advisor of a former workplace colleague, but whom I never socialized with
    * a researcher at another lab, who I have only ever talked to once, and have never emailed
    * a years-ago dance instructor whom I only ever contacted twice, via phone
    * a guy whom I co-authored a single scientific paper with years ago, and emailed only once
    * various students who have taken my courses
    * a woman who worked at the same company I worked at, but whom I never had an email contact with (outside of the company's proprietary and encrypted Lotus Notes system)
    * a former program manager at a lab I formerly worked at, 10 years ago, whom I only interacted with in person (no email)
    * another guy I co-authored a journal article with, but never contacted by email outside my former employer's encrypted LotusNotes email system
    * my former accountant
    * a former frat brother, from 15 years ago, whom I have never emailed
    * various program managers at national funding agencies whom I have contacted in the past via phone/email
    * several former colleagues that I never emailed, but had only verbal contact with, from a lab 12 years ago
    * a professor whom I emailed only once, 12 years ago regarding a postdoc position, but never met
    * the son of a former colleague, who I ever only heard about in lunch conversation, and never interacted with
    * a roommate from 10 years ago
    * a prof I took an undergrad course from 19 years ago
    * lots of profs and researchers whom I know professionally and personally, but whom I have never emailed
    * plus lots of false hits...

    Very creepy, and really, in a couple of cases violating HIPPA regulations through their disclosure of who-knows-whom.

    Where are they mining? People's email address books, certainly. But probably also my bank, author lists on publications, speaker lists at conferences, and perhaps people who simply look up my profile.

    Too creepy. I will soon cancel my LinkedIn account, and just make a website bearing my name (I already own the domain), so that people can find me without all of this creepy gray-zone crap.

    1. Re:LinkedIn is Creepier than Facebook by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > Too creepy. I will soon cancel my LinkedIn account, and just make a website bearing my name (I already own the domain), so that people can find me without all of this creepy gray-zone crap.

      Serendipity. Back in the early days of the web, I spent a minor fortune on a domain of my real name and a set of fixed IP addresses to the house on a (then) high speed connection so I could have an internet presence under my absolute control. It still exists (using dyndns now) but hasn't been updated in years, due to facebook and linkedin and their ilk. But it's gotten so bad, that just last weekend I was exploring CMS packages with an eye to making my site useful again.

      Back then, I created the web site because there weren't any alternatives. I am now considering reviving it because all the alternatives have become intolerable for one reason or another.

      It's like the first decade of the 21st century was some kind of brief, golden age for social media, before it abruptly went off the rails.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:LinkedIn is Creepier than Facebook by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

      Very creepy, and really, in a couple of cases violating HIPPA[sic] regulations through their disclosure of who-knows-whom.

      I assume you mean HIPAA? How is LinkedIn bound by being HIPAA compliant?

      http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/srsummary.html

      The only privacy agreement they are under is the one you (and millions of others) signed up for AND agreed to.
      I truly hope you are not shocked to hear this; but, they sell your information by data mining the heck out of it and categorizing you (and millions of others) into nice little packages of "Would probably buy" product X. Advertisers stumble over themselves attempting to get your eyeballs (and millions of others) into looking at their advert so you (and millions of others) have a chance to buy their product or service(s).

      Do you use Google? Their whole business model is to sell profiles to advertisers. Bing, Yahoo!, AskJeeves, and SLASHDOT, too.

      I do feel your pain, though.

    3. Re:LinkedIn is Creepier than Facebook by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, they're also mining former jobs. explaining a bunch of them.

      I never get linkedin spam.

      why? I've lost access to the email account I got on my linkedin profile! PERFECT!

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:LinkedIn is Creepier than Facebook by jason777 · · Score: 1

      Hah, sounds like their "you may know" algorithm works pretty well!

    5. Re:LinkedIn is Creepier than Facebook by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Yes, I meant HIPAA.

      Also, I meant that whoever provided LinkedIn with that information was possibly in violation. Entities that know the connection are my insurer, the psychiatrist, and other medical professionals, any of which would have been in violation of HIPAA for this. Three other entities, my bank, cell provider, and email provider, would of course not be subject to such constraints. Oh, some attorneys knew also, but no public filings; private settlement.

      Web-footprints seem doubtful in this case. I doubt the psychiatrist even has a web site, and I was referred verbally by someone in the same building.

      Ah well.

    6. Re:LinkedIn is Creepier than Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got 38 prime contacts, whom I know, linking me to 1.6 million secondary and tertiary contacts. The population of London /who have LinkedIn accounts/ is around 2.5 million, so odds are good I've already got many of those people (a million of them, maybe?) as secondary and tertiary links. So, OK, LinkedIn isn't recommending any creepily intimate connections to /me/, but the odds are good those links would be in there somewhere. I don't think it's necessarily intentionally creepy, it's a combination of the small world effect combined with a smart(ish) database programmed to find connections. So the level of cross-connections you list is pretty much what I'd expect to see, frankly. To pick two examples, my hairdresser and plumber don't seem to have LinkedIn accounts, but if they did I think the odds of them somehow showing up on my contact list would be quite high.

  40. Another Incident in a String by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cancelled my LinkedIn account after the last blatant exploitation incident. But I still keep getting them. This just confirms why I cancelled my account.

  41. linkedin used to be useful by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Back in the day, linkedin used to be a useful way of connecting with people in the industry. I ignore "people you may know" (note to linkedin: if I may know them and I'm not currently connected, there may be a reason) but the real annoyance is the continuous request to link with obvious dummy contacts for marketing groups. That is, linked in requests to spam. And THEN, and then, there are the linked in requests that *are* themselves spam. "Arianna Dateme has requested a link with you. 'Hi, Ron, when I talked to you at that last conference, you expressed interest in our marketing buzzword generation service. Our team of trained weasels are ready to jump to your service in scalable vertical analytic b2c hyperlocal targeted contact enhancement. Call me on my private line for more information!'" It's getting very near the point where I'm dumping my account. The only thing I can think of that would make it worse is if they started charging. Oh wait.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  42. Linkedin, good for unsolicited sales pings by Sadsfae · · Score: 1

    I've gotten quite a bit more unsolicited vendor contact which I can almost surely pinpoint to linkedin.
    Aggressive sales folk have figured out most companies email addresses are first letter of first name, last name.
    If yours fits in under the normal kerberos/(open)LDAP limitations.. yep, you can ascertain my work email.

    I usually get a few a day, and digging through to the HTML link to unsubscribe seems to do nothing to fight
    the overwhelming wave of incoming bothers. Most of these solicitations seem to be auto-scraped and generated,
    for example any simple review of my profile would see I'm not interested in Microsoft solutions.. or they are not relevant
    to my job function, seemingly to only generated by a keyword or two.

    --
    Have a squat over at the hobo house.
  43. So much complaining over nothing by Stiletto · · Score: 1

    Wow, all this butt-hurt over a site that nobody is forcing you to use, which sends invitations nobody is forcing you to read. Personally I like LinkedIn, and don't think I've been spammed inappropriately or offended by any content it's displayed to me. If you don't feel the same way, you're free to cancel your account. What's the big deal? So much outrage!

  44. Re:maybe you could try turning off email notificat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently you're not terribly good at reading between the lines.
    Social networking isn't your thing, it's for the best you not use LinkedIn.

  45. That's easy to decide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they signed with the private keys of your contacts?

  46. Here's how it's happening... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The LinkedIn mobile app is looking at contact info stored on your smartphone...ALL contact data, past and present...and whatever other apps (example: Facebook) are linked to your smartphone contacts. Even if you have the settings set to ultra-private, the app still collects this data. After that data has been linked, the only way to "unlink" it is to completely delete your LinkedIn profile, and create an entirely new one, with a new email address, and don't install the LinkedIn mobile app.

  47. linkedin spammer by charlesr44403 · · Score: 1

    I long ago wrote off Linkedin as an offensive spammer. They need to shut down.

  48. StinkedIn Glitch by JimtownKelly · · Score: 1

    This happened to me also. They changed their method of suggesting names derived from contact lists, and offered checkboxes so you could deselect names before submitting. Several of the names that I deselected recieved invites, and now I have contacts that I really didn't want at all. I just hope those who didn't accept my false invitation don't report me as a spammer. That would suck even more than this glitch.

    --
    -- Jimtown Kelly
  49. Re:maybe you could try turning off email notificat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently you're not terribly good at reading between the lines.

    Social networking isn't your thing, it's for the best you not use LinkedIn.

    I always wondered what "Social networking" looked like. Apparently, it looks like high school.

  50. Well that explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, that's why I got a linked-in connect request from an ex-girlfriend who I kicked out because she was mentally ill, who married someone else a couple weeks after moving out (and divorced a year later), and whom I didn't think I was going to hear from again after the restraining order? You mean to say the request wasn't actually FROM her? (Yeah, I just quietly ignored it anyway. Never a good idea to encourage crazy to contact you.)

  51. Yup. All that. by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1

    I'm into AI development, post on slashdot, and don't get spam E-mail to begin with.

    Reactive measures to deal with SPAM are pointless, they're a waste of time. The right way is to not get spam in the first place.

    I'm careful about giving away my E-mail, use disposable addresses with everyone except close friends and family, and simply "turn off" any address that receives unwanted messages.

    Filters are a PITA, they take time to create, tune, check, and manage. Have any useful messages been mistakenly put in your spam folder? I've never had that problem. I also don't scan for viruses, and have never been infected. My firewall is pretty solid.

    Your intelligence project is doomed.

    Thank you. I base my life on the opinions of others, and yours has added valuable input to that effort.

  52. I sincerely hope... by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

    ...that LinkedIn will be first against the wall when the revolution comes.

    I also hope that it will come really soon.

    --
    Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
  53. FaceBook Did the Same by YaddaMinski · · Score: 1

    Why was FB not flagged for doing the same? These companies are valued on registered users that were inflated by this fraudulent marketing. How many of these users are regular users? 40%? LinkedIn P/E is 916 and FB's is 1,712. Can you say crash?

  54. aniket, again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been getting spam addressed to someone named "aniket", or something like that (I don't have one handy to look at) for *years*. I've even complained to linkedin, and they said this and that, and nothing's changed.

    I want an option that lets me say, NO, I DO NOT WANT TO CONNECT TO THIS IDIOT, NOR DO I EVER WANT TO RECEIVE ANYTHING FROM THEM AGAIN!!!

                mark