Slashdot Mirror


Hands-Free Or Voice-Activated Texting Not Safer

Meshach writes "A recent study (PDF) detailed in the Washington Post verifies that using hands-free or voice-activated texting is no safer than texting with your hands while you are driving a car. Using a handheld device to tap out a text message while driving has been banned in many states and provinces. From the article: '"One of the common comments was that they felt an inclination to look down at the screen to see if it heard them correctly, so that could be one possible explanation of why they were not looking at the roadway more frequently," Yager said. She said drivers said they felt safer when using voice-activated texting than when entering messages on a keyboard. "Perhaps it is because they view it as safer and therefore it must be, but still they have this inclination to look down at the screen," she said. "We found that their driving performance suffered equally with both methods." As has been proven in studies of cellphone conversations, Yager said drivers engaged in any form of texting were distracted by the communication effort.'"

7 of 157 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Has more to do with focus than the behavior. by s1d3track3D · · Score: 4, Funny

    unless your Mr. Bean

  2. Re:only partially agree by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you have an android phone, I wrote an app, TextSoundly, that automatically detects when you're moving at driving speeds and turns on voice texting/response.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  3. Re:only partially agree by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Informative

    However, the problem is that this study is only looking at reaction time, which is pretty limited of a measure. This is especially true since its also been found that cell phone accidents are likely not entirely caused by reaction time issues.

    http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/08/why-cell-phone-bans-dont-work.html

    So, bad drivers, the ones who get in accidents don't just use cell phones, they drive more wrecklessly while using them. They choose to use them at particularly dangerous times. They do, exactly what most people choose not to do.

    The problem, quite simply, is not cell phones. They are just the device people have chosen to measure. The problem is not cell phones because, the problem is not reaction time. The problem is judgement and the problem is risk assesment within certain individuals.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  4. Re:Here's a thought... by mcrbids · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Studies have shown that bluetooth headsets make no difference when it comes to preventing accidents. The cause is clear, just sit in a car during an in-car conversation and simulate a near accident by stomping the breaks hard without provocation.

    All talking stops instantly and stays stopped during the entire perceived danger. Granted, you may get bruises for freaking everybody out, but you'll understand the point:

    Conversations in a car will never the be the same as a conversation happening with somebody outside the car. People driving with you inadvertently "help" you in a crisis by pausing in their communications during a crisis situation.

    Interestingly, there's a small percentage of people (around 15% or so) for whom talking on a cell phone has no measurable effect on their driving. These are people with the ability to interrupt the conversation flow, saying "just a minute" or simply ignoring the conversation altogether during a crisis.

    If you want training in how to do this, I'd recommend getting a pilot's license. While getting even a basic private license, the number of things you are expected to do precisely, concurrently during takeoff/landing boggles the mind to a newbie coming from a car. You are commonly expected to be manipulating radio controls, rudder controls, Elevator controls, and Aileron controls concurrently while watching a half dozen instruments and chatting with some guy a mile away in a tower.

    You figure out quick how to ignore him when something unexpected happens!

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  5. Survey schmuervey by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Insightful

    She said drivers said they felt safer when using voice-activated texting than when entering messages on a keyboard.

    What did cyclists, pedestrians and other drivers think?

    The surviving ones, I mean.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  6. Re:only partially agree by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is why I tell my kids, that driving takes 100% concentration. That while most of the time, 50-80% is usually good enough, you can't predict when the asshole in the left lane is going to swerve right three lanes because he is about to miss his exit, because he was too busy getting a BJ from his boyfriend or talking/txting/watching a video on a cell phone.

    The point is, it doesn't matter what the other guy is doing, he is the danger. If you're 100% concentrating on driving you have a much better chance of avoiding the accident. AND that is worth everything.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  7. Re:only partially agree by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Singing ads.

    Be the first, start a trend!

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!