Slashdot Mirror


Smithsonian Releases 128-Year-Old Recording of Alexander Graham Bell

redletterdave writes "Thanks to a newly developed audio extraction technology called optical scanning, the Smithsonian was able to recover the voice of Alexander Graham Bell from one of his hundreds of discs he donated to the museum, which were once considered 'mute artifacts.' Since many of the collected recordings are very fragile due to their age and experimental nature, optical scanning is a non-invasive procedure that creates a high-resolution digital map of the disc or cylinder, which is then reconstructed and used to simulate the motion of a stylus moving through its grooves to reproduce the original audio content. Bell, who created this recording on a wax and cardboard disc on April 15, 1885, can be heard clearly saying, 'In witness whereof — hear my voice, Alexander Graham Bell.'"

122 comments

  1. Re:FINAL WARNING TO SLASHDOT... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Disregard that last post, I suck cocks.

  2. But... by WillyWanker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did they secure the rights and pay the royalties on this recording? Someone call the RIAA. I smell a copyright lawsuit!

    1. Re:But... by Revek · · Score: 1

      Came to say something like this. Some troll will claim the right to it and demand payment if you listen to it.

    2. Re:But... by girlintraining · · Score: 2

      Did they secure the rights and pay the royalties on this recording? Someone call the RIAA. I smell a copyright lawsuit!

      The original recording has no copyright. The recording of the recording, does, since the original had no copyright. Copyright is like a parasite... it attaches itself to everything.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    3. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not in the US.

      Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. (1999) sets precedent for this remaining public domain.

      "A photograph which is no more than a copy of a work of another as exact as science and technology permits lacks originality. That is not to say that such a feat is trivial, simply not original."

    4. Re:But... by jamstar7 · · Score: 2

      Give it time. Congress is getting ready to 'overhaul' copyright law. And if you believe it'll be for the public good, I've got some lovely land to sell you in Florida. It's halfways between Key West and Havana, liberal zoning laws, you can do anything you want there, as long as you can do it in 200+ feet of water...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    5. Re:But... by jameshofo · · Score: 1

      It's on it way, unfortunately the lawyer assigned to the case is driving from California to DC because the one TSA agent at LAX was tied up in court over supposedly violating someones supposed civil rights while enforcing TSA mandate by beat a man attempting to storm a terminal with a liquid containing extremely high concentrations of Hydrogen and Oxygen.

      --
      Good leaders run toward problems, bad leaders hide from them.
    6. Re:But... by darkfeline · · Score: 1

      Is 200+ feet enough to build an underwater city free from the greedy hands of capitalism and communism?

    7. Re:But... by adolf · · Score: 1

      Is 200+ feet enough to build an underwater city free from the greedy hands of capitalism and communism?

      No. Per the description, it's still in Florida.

    8. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people are known by their full name. No one would presume to call J.R.R. Tolkien just John Tolkien, or Edgar Allan Poe just Edgar Poe. There's a huge list of people who are commonly referred to with their middle name. Heck, I'm one of them. I have the same name as my dad, grandfather, and so on for eight generations. Growing up I've always included my middle name because to me that was my identity. It was what made me unique. If people choose to be known by their full names you should respect that. That may be expecting a bit much from a misogynistic troll though.

    9. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel like I should vomit after reading this, a very odd confusion of "it could be sadly true" and "it's funny as hell".

    10. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DMCA takedown request already on its way!

    11. Re:But... by monkeyhybrid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Anonymous Yellow-belly Coward, is that you?

    12. Re:But... by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2

      Did they secure the rights and pay the royalties on this recording? Someone call the RIAA. I smell a copyright lawsuit!

      I know you are joking, but unfortunately according to the horrible decision in Capitol Records vs. Naxos of America, Inc. those Alexander Graham Bell records are technically still under copyright.
      http://http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20050412225604578

      To summarize the court case, Naxos, a classical music label, was taking old 78 RPM vinyl records and using modern technology to clean up the surface noise and putting them out on a budget label they run. This was perfectly legal in the EU and Asia as the recordings in question were over 50 years old and not under copyright in those places. Unfortunately they got greedy in the USA and released a CD of Pablo Casals' famous recordings of the Bach Cello Suites from the 1930s. There was never any doubt that these recordings were still covered by US copyright law and I remain amazed to this day that Naxos somehow believed that they could get away with this reissue in the USA, but Capitol (the US copyright owner of the recordings) found out about the release in the US market and sued them and won. In my opinion the court decision was far overreaching, ruling that every sound recording ever made in the USA before 1972 was still under copyright protection through state law and would remain so until the superseding Federal law covering copyrights allows those copyrights to begin to expire, which will be 2067 at the earliest. The case is somewhat involved but basically after realizing they got caught with their hands in the cookie jar, Naxos resorted to some legal trickery in arguing that the Casals recordings (they were all made in London, England) were not covered by US state copyright law since they weren't made in the USA. The court didn't buy it and ruled that everything ever released or recorded in the USA is still under copyright and since Naxos had no real way to argue the case any further (they did indeed violate US copyright law), this crazy decision remains the US law on the matter.

    13. Re:But... by WillyWanker · · Score: 1

      The thing is in all honesty I was only half joking. I do genuinely wonder if because of the fucked up copyright when it comes to sound recordings if it really is still under copyright.

    14. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If TFA had said "Al Bell" who would have known WTF it was talking about? Alexander Graham Bell is how the man is known to history, moron.

    15. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is necessary and it is important. If only to piss you off.

  3. Not exactly new technology by MSRedfox · · Score: 1

    It's a nice improvement on what was posted on here in 2002. http://news.slashdot.org/story/02/09/05/1814203/ripping-vinyl-via-your-scanner Much better quality scan, but the idea has been around a while.

  4. Sadly it is not available any more. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Funny

    RIAA issued a DMCA take down notice and they had to take it down.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Sadly it is not available any more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you know that all of the links on
      http://www.ibtimes.com/hear-my-voice-alexander-graham-bell-smithsonian-discovers-128-year-old-recording-telephone-inventor
      are broken - I get nothing but 404s.

    2. Re:Sadly it is not available any more. by Vultaire · · Score: 1

      Just tried. The links work fine for me.

    3. Re:Sadly it is not available any more. by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Not this joke again ... you're beginning to sound like a broken record!

    4. Re:Sadly it is not available any more. by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      you're beginning to sound like a broken record!

      What is the copyright status of a broken record?

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    5. Re:Sadly it is not available any more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're beginning to sound like a broken record!

      What is the copyright status of a broken record?

      Somebody broke the copyright.

    6. Re:Sadly it is not available any more. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      The record is broken, the law is broken, the legislature is (house) broken, but the rent seeking copyright babies are stronger than ever

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    7. Re:Sadly it is not available any more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The record is broken! You're broken! I'm broken! The whole !@#$ing system is broken!

  5. Not exactly new dates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  6. proofread your posts much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you got some gibberish in your article, you had my wife and I both scouring the internet trying to figure out what the eff the word âoeage means

    1. Re:proofread your posts much? by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 2

      It's Welsh you insensitive clod!

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    2. Re:proofread your posts much? by JeanCroix · · Score: 2

      And it's pronounced "Throatwobbler Mangrove."

    3. Re:proofread your posts much? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Can't be - the word isn't long enough.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  7. Get Orrin Hatch on the Phone! by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Funny

    We need legislation to restrict the sale of this laser scanner machine ASAP: It's obviously being used as a circumvention device.

    1. Re:Get Orrin Hatch on the Phone! by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you outlaw lasers, only sharks will have lasers!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Get Orrin Hatch on the Phone! by mitzoe · · Score: 1

      Won't somebody think of the ill-tempered sea bass?!

  8. My old foggy slashdot memory... by t0qer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember years ago on /., there was an article where a guy claimed he had done this, but the slashdot pitchforks were raised while chanting fraud.

    http://news.slashdot.org/story/02/09/05/1814203/ripping-vinyl-via-your-scanner

    There it is.

    Nice to know the guy's technology actually worked.

    1. Re:My old foggy slashdot memory... by frootcakeuk · · Score: 1

      I remember reading this then too! I also remember that he used a normal home scanner to do his :) Awesome

      --
      Remember kids: What's right isn't as important as what's profitable.
    2. Re:My old foggy slashdot memory... by frootcakeuk · · Score: 1

      of course it does! Long day, tired, sorry.

      --
      Remember kids: What's right isn't as important as what's profitable.
    3. Re:My old foggy slashdot memory... by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Informative

      Something similar has also been used more recently to play a record that doesn't exist anymore in physical format, but had a photograph printed in a book that survives. They were able to optically play a scan of the printed photograph of the record.

    4. Re:My old foggy slashdot memory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some Japanese company sells a ridiculously priced (several thousand USD) laser-based record player.

      A lot of the sales pitch is audiophile-type fantastic claims, but all BS aside, the core technology of scanning the record grooves with a laser does work, well enough to be commercialized.

      It's probably not worth it, but to somebody who is preserving rare old records it is probably a solid investment.

    5. Re:My old foggy slashdot memory... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      that's a pretty good photo and print. amazing.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:My old foggy slashdot memory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newly developed audio extracting technology, yeah right.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_turntable

    7. Re:My old foggy slashdot memory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you RTFA you'll see where this is a vast improvement. The "scan an LP" only measured widths of the grooves, which would only return one channel of a stereo record and return nothing from a monophonic recording. This method scans a 3-D space and uses lasers.

      For an explanation, with monophonic records, the stylus moved up and down. With stereo, the depth of the groove returned both channels and the width of the groove returned one channel only, making stereo records backwards compatible with monophonic turntables. On a stereo system the single channel played one channel, and was fed to the mixed channel which canceled that channel out of the mix.

      So this is similar, but nowhere near the same.

      Scanning a record with a scanner would result in unacceptable resolution as well.

    8. Re:My old foggy slashdot memory... by Dripdry · · Score: 1

      A friend from high school was working on this, what, 6-8 years ago for a college's music archive.

      Is that you causing all this ruckus, Rob?

      --
      -
  9. Direct Links by guttentag · · Score: 5, Informative

    The link in the summary goes to the International Business Times, which links to a copy of the 11-second audio clip on Soundcloud that requires flash to run. The IBT article links to the original articles at the Smithsonian. Here's a direct link to the MP3 file on the Smithsonian site.

    1. Re:Direct Links by anagama · · Score: 2

      and a movie, w/ cool tools starting about halfway through:
      http://www.smithsonianmag.com/multimedia/videos/Playing-the-Unplayable-Records.html

      And maybe some swearing recorded too in a failed attempt, but I'll need to listen another 10 dozen times to figure it out.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    2. Re:Direct Links by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Web 2.0 is so easy to use!

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  10. He probably said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "God, I hate what AT&T has become!"

  11. Yeah right by maxrate · · Score: 0

    Sounds like Bell was liquored up when he recorded that. Barely make anything out. I appreciate the effort that went into recovering that sound bite, but let's be honest - it's pretty disappointing.

    1. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Bell was liquored up when he recorded that. Barely make anything out. I appreciate the effort that went into recovering that sound bite, but let's be honest - it's pretty disappointing.

      I know. Like the computer just made some lights blink. What the fuck was that about? /sarcasm

    2. Re:Yeah right by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      (as all great inventors, none of them actually are american ^__^)

      Samuel Colt, John Browning, Eugene Stoner, Daniel Wesson, Benjamin Tyler Henry. All American inventors, all invented guns. You can't get much more American than that :)

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:Yeah right by darkfeline · · Score: 1

      In a sense, I wouldn't count that breakthrough invention though. The gun was invent in China back way before Europe even got around to burning witches. However, IIRC America did invent the rifle/barrel rifling?

    4. Re:Yeah right by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Rifling was invented in 1520 in Germany. (wikipedia). It became useful for small arms with the Minie system (French) in the mid 1800s.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    5. Re:Yeah right by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Edwin Howard Armstrong.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    6. Re:Yeah right by idunham · · Score: 1

      Not rifling, but the revolver...and several other repeaters.
      As you would see if you had looked up the inventors named.

    7. Re:Yeah right by bickerdyke · · Score: 0

      Is that that guy who made a few minor improvements to Marconi's inventions? :-)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guglielmo_Marconi

      --
      bickerdyke
    8. Re:Yeah right by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Baker rifles were used by the British in the Napoleonic wars.

      That's early 1800s, for the benefit of any Americans.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Yeah right by grenadeh · · Score: 1

      Rifling != gun. Firearms in the crudest sense were invented centuries before Europeans ever thought of the concept. Ever heard of a rocket? Invented by the Chinese. A long ass time before the most crude arquebus and other firearms were.

  12. What about Elisha Gray? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Philo Farnsworth and Rosalind Franklin...

  13. Another interesting one by asshole+felcher · · Score: 1

    though not as old (124 years?), a gramophone image printed in a book was restored last year.

  14. The smile on my face... by MugenEJ8 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Seriously, how f*cking cool is that! Goosebumps and the whole nine yards.

    Being able to extract the information from the disc without using its native interpreter in order to preserve it, is just brilliant. Then we just use our smart computrons to simulate it being played and voila.

    We're seriously badass... I wonder if Mr. Bell was thinking the same thing!

    1. Re:The smile on my face... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the next level would be an app for that. Just take a photo of the disc with your smartphone, done. :-)

      As a side note: I remember reading about a japanese company selling laser record players, doing exactly the same thing with your good old 33 and 45rpm discs.

    2. Re:The smile on my face... by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

      Na, CSI already did this years ago.

      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    3. Re:The smile on my face... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, how f*cking cool is that! Goosebumps and the whole nine yards.

      Being able to extract the information from the disc without using its native interpreter in order to preserve it, is just brilliant. Then we just use our smart computrons to simulate it being played and voila.

      We're seriously badass... I wonder if Mr. Bell was thinking the same thing!

      Thank you for find this as cools as I do. It's easy to be cynical with RIAA comments (many of which are justified!), but this is just plain neat.

    4. Re:The smile on my face... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Before CSI was even born, X-Files did it. An episode involved a pot that had been crafted in a room where Jesus Christ was speaking, and a reed being brushed against it recorded him into the clay.

  15. Not a new thing by laing · · Score: 1

    I remember reading about this technology 10 years ago: http://www.phys.huji.ac.il/~springer/DigitalNeedle/

    1. Re:Not a new thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine getting optically-scanned data into an audibly recognizable waveform from an experimental foil recording ~140 years old is more difficult than getting it from a 40-60 year old pressed vinyl/shellac record. It involves more than just scanning it in, there's some digital post-processing that mathematically converts the image into something listenable. I'm not sure if the advances to make reading Edison's recording were made on the optics side, the processing side, or both.

      Optical record readers were first prototyped in the 1980s, using lasers, but never caught on due to technical problems and high cost. (IIRC one was briefly available commercially for around $15,000 in '80s dollars). So the idea is even older than 10 years. The thing you need to understand is that the distinction between idea and the implementation - theory vs practice. People had [i]theorized[/i] about recovering Edison's recordings, but they had never had the capacity to [i]actually do it[/i] until now. Gotta love progress.

  16. It wasn't just the Smithsonian by itamblyn · · Score: 1

    From the article: "The audio was recovered by a team of scholars consisting of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory physicist Carl Haber, National Museum of American History curator Carlene Stephens and Library of Congress digital conversion specialist Peter Alyea, among others." See also here: http://newscenter.lbl.gov/science-shorts/2013/04/25/alexander-graham-bell/

  17. "Clearly"?? by nsteinme · · Score: 1

    I don't know about anyone else, but I found the clip unintelligible. The number of syllables doesn't even seem to line up.

    --
    call me FOSS im the boss with the sauce and the source
    1. Re:"Clearly"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to listen to it a few times to realize all he is saying is "hear my voice, Alexander Graham Bell" and not 'In witness whereof — hear my voice, Alexander Graham Bell.'

    2. Re:"Clearly"?? by zbobet2012 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A genius from a century and a quarter ago just spoke to you and you are complaining that it is hard to understand?

    3. Re:"Clearly"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the only part that can be made out is his name... rubbish

    4. Re:"Clearly"?? by lxs · · Score: 1

      Even worse: No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

    5. Re:"Clearly"?? by leonardluen · · Score: 2

      still sounds better than most cellphones.

  18. the list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first post is a troll... check
    all of the "jokes" are about copyright... check
    the accomplishment is shit on... check

    oh slashdot... never change.

  19. Alexendar Graham Bell - The great inventor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From a comment in a Washington Post article:
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/innovations/wp/2013/04/24/what-did-alexander-graham-bell-sound-like-now-we-know/

    "Actually Bell didn't invent the telephone, so probably not the voice recorder either.
    In 2002 the US Congress recognized an Italian immigrant named
    Antonio Meucci as the inventor, 16 years prior to Bell.
    He demonstrated his 'teletrofono' in NYC in 1860.
    Bell had access to his research materials and took out a patent on them.
    Read about it here
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/jun/17/humanities.internationaleducationnews"
    So... Bell was like Apple.

  20. Mr. Watson by PPH · · Score: 2

    Come here. I need you to issue a take-down notice.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  21. Ok this is cool and all but... by xQuarkDS9x · · Score: 1

    For crying out loud why the heck did they not at least give a link to the original uncompressed audio file? Or at least in FLAC format? I had some trouble understanding what he was saying in the MP3 file then I looked up the details in Mediainfo....

    Overall bit rate mode - Constant
    Overall bit rate - 96.0 Kbps
    Track name - Hear-my-voice-DCFIR
    Writing library - iTunes 11.0.1

    Seriousely if they wanted to release a better sounding clip they should not have used iTunes to encode this in MP3. They would have been much better off having two samples one in uncompressed FLAC and another in Ogg Vorbis format which would have sounded better then the MP3. Maybe this is why so many people are having issues understanding the entire clip because of how MP3 adds in those lovely sound distortions, hisses, and sizzles.

    --
    You must master your joystick like a fisherman masters bait! - Gimpy
    1. Re:Ok this is cool and all but... by globalist · · Score: 2

      Are you seriously saying the reason the clip is crappy-sounding is because of MP3 compression AND (god forbid!) iTunes? If you're not, then I give you 10/10 for trolling!

    2. Re:Ok this is cool and all but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about how much rotational velocidensity degrades MP3s on your hard drive, now imagine that over 128 years..

    3. Re:Ok this is cool and all but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about iTunes (I rip my own with EAC and K3B depending on which computer I'm using) but when the GP says "how MP3 adds in those lovely sound distortions, hisses, and sizzles." Actually that's neither correct nor incorrect. I've found from sampling vinyl and cassettes, burning to CD and ripping to Ogg and MP3 that those sounds are already there, but MP3 (and Ogg, too) makes the noise louder and stand out more. In a hundred year old recording there would be a LOT of noise and distortion, and the MP3 would make them worse. A FLAC should be far better but it would still be noisy.

      And I think his problem is lack of good communications skills, rather than trolling. English may not be his first language.

  22. Bell didn't invent the telephone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually Bell didn't invent the telephone.
    In 2002 the US Congress recognized an Italian immigrant named
    Antonio Meucci as the inventor, 16 years prior to Bell.
    He demonstrated his 'teletrofono' in NYC in 1860.
    Bell had access to his research materials and took out a patent on them.

    You can read about Meucci and the story of it here:
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/jun/17/humanities.internationaleducationnews

    1. Re:Bell didn't invent the telephone by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      So even back in the 1800's the patent system (while a little slower) was broken?

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
  23. Can you hear me now? by FuzzNugget · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, but the latency is a bitch!

  24. Link to ... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... a newly developed audio extraction technology called optical scanning ...

    I was reading the above quote in TFA and hmm... I just had to find out what is that "newly developed technology"

    Here's the link ... http://irene.lbl.gov/3D-Scanning.pdf

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  25. Not new... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    This isn't exactly new technology... it's been around for over a decade now.

    1. Re:Not new... by virgnarus · · Score: 1

      Yes, well over a decade.

  26. LOC release by cyberzephyr · · Score: 1

    I'm a bit disappointed with the forum tonight. I have held a Reader card at LOC for years and it's funny folks would make fun of this discovery and release. :-(

    --
    I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
    1. Re:LOC release by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      You almost always get useless trolling types in /. stories, I'm used to disregarding them and stay grateful for the gems among the chaff. The Meucci story and the audio mp3 are those gems. Cool story.

  27. Link to the audio by idunham · · Score: 2
    1. Re:Link to the audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you.

  28. What a waste of time! by mutube · · Score: 2

    They should have just taken some grainy photos of the disc and let Reddit sort it out.

    [Seriously though, this is awesome.]

  29. Direct link to audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  30. Bell's first recording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm waiting for his first ever recording to be found.. "testing.. testing.. 1.. 2.. 3... err, is this thing on?"

  31. ibitimes by aclarke · · Score: 1

    Could we please stop linking to ibitimes.com? Am I the only person here to be so annoyed by their automatic audio on the site that I never want to go there again?

  32. Copyright by Anon,+Not+Coward+D · · Score: 1

    so... it finally expired?

    --
    Sometimes it's better not having signature
  33. A recording of Alexander Graham Bell? by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Sweet.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  34. Very Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something isn't right. The pictured disc looks like a CD with wax on it, not cardboard and wax. Furthermore, the writing in the wax on the lower side labels it as "Disk A.G.B No. 1." with a "K" in the word "disk".

    In the 1800's, as today, disc is spelled with a "C". Disk is a modern-day computer specific contraction of diskette. It would not have been used at the time of this recording.

    This smells fishy.

    1. Re:Very Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you're not trolling...

      See Wikipedia. "Disk" with a K is the standard American spelling (and has been for several hundred years) of "disc", and references to "phonograph disk" go back at least to the 1880s. In astronomy, we talk about the disk of the Sun, planetary disks, etc. In computer terminology, diskette is a modern term formed by adding the diminutive suffix "-ette" to the word "disk" to imply a small disk. "Compact Disc" is a defined technical term with a specified spelling.

      The word comes from Latin discus, which in turn comes from Greek diskos.

    2. Re:Very Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he was an American. They can't spell colour, let alone aluminium.

  35. Still silent to me, needs Adobe flash by ikhider · · Score: 1

    According to this piece, I am required to Install Adobe flash to hear a public domain recording. This should have gone to Archive.org instead, the site posted a Soundcloud interface. Naughty-naughty. I can understand a rock band who does not know any better, but the Smithsonian? Make public domain media Libre friendly please.

    --
    "SO we bide our time, waiting for a purer kick to bloom and the future is still bleak, uncertain and beautiful" -GSYBE
    1. Re:Still silent to me, needs Adobe flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the news again. It's a "mute artifact" unless you go high tech :P

      [I completely agree with your statement. The usage of unneeded 3rd party software should be banned]

  36. Hey, it looks like a CD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bell must have had a little more future view than we thought!

  37. Yay by grenadeh · · Score: 1

    To quote a breaking bad meme/quote, SCIENCE, BITCHES!

  38. Laser turntable for vinyl records (1970s?) by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

    Not exactly new. New application, maybe.

  39. Skrillex remix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Expected soon? ;-)