Slashdot Mirror


New Device Sniffs Out Black Powder Explosives

sciencehabit writes "The Boston marathon bombers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev reportedly purchased several pounds of black powder explosive before the bombing. Used in fireworks and bullets, the explosive substance is both deadly and widely available. It's also very hard to detect. Now, researchers have modified one bomb-sniffing device to accurately spot very small amounts of black powder, an advance that could make us safer from future attacks. What has prevented detection of black powder by IMS in the past, however, is that sulfur and oxygen -- which composes 20% of air—hit the detector at almost the same time. A strong oxygen signal can thus mask a small amount of sulfur, like what a bombmaker's dirty fingers might leave on a luggage strap. A group led by chemist Haiyang Li at the Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics in China modified an IMS to eliminate the oxygen signal. 'We have tested the sensitivity of TR-IMS, and its limit of detection of black powder can reach as low as 0.05 nanograms,' Li says."

133 comments

  1. or... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 2

    ...detects the presence of musketeers!

    1. Re:or... by icebike · · Score: 4, Informative

      And tiny firecrackers, and the smoke there-of.
      Legal uses of black powder would easily swamp and overwhelm this detector. So in order to prevent false positives,
      expect a major crackdown on black powder. Vaseline too.

      Further, its never been hard to train dogs to sniff out black powder, so having a machine that does this is probably not much cheaper.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't work where I live, my town has a sulfur refining plant. Or any place with any significant amount of coal production or other coal-related industry.

    3. Re:or... by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      Legal uses of radiation therapy arent stopping them from harassing innocent citizens with over zealous radiation detection.

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:or... by JTsyo · · Score: 1

      How much sulfur is in a fart?

    5. Re:or... by techsimian · · Score: 1

      None? CH4 != S

    6. Re:or... by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      Or an orange grove -- they use oil-sulfur sprays on those, the whole thing has a faint whiff of SO2. Grew up in the middle of one, and years later someone opened up a bag of gardening sulfur near me, and "HOME!" hit me in the nose.

    7. Re:or... by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      CH4 doesn't smell, H2S on the other hand...

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    8. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seed the target area weeks in advance with small quantities.

    9. Re:or... by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Or for any place that has a restaurant serving onions or garlic.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    10. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmmm....eggs

    11. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:or... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      they use oil-sulfur sprays on those, the whole thing has a faint whiff of SO2.

      But, elemental sulphur doesn't smell of sulphur dioxide. Sulphur dioxide smells of sulphur dioxide, so I deduce that you were burning these "oil-sulphur" sprays. Or ... there's some pretty powerful chemical ju-ju going on with that oil to oxidise elemental sulphur to the dioxide (in which case, I'd be very worried about being within fumes range let alone droplets range of this witch's brew). Or just possibly, your "sulphur" part of the mixture is actually something like sodium sulphite, which does release sulphur dioxide under relatively gentle conditions.

      Don't get me started on the number of people who "know" that hydrogen sulphide "smells of rotten eggs", but don't know what rotten eggs smell like. The number of times that I've been called to the drill floor because one of the hands think that they have smelled "sour gas" (H2S), to find nothing showing on the hand-held tester, but a nasty smell nonetheless. I re-calibrate my nose routinely (when I do the calibration check on our plumbed-in and hand-held portable gas detector machines), and I know what H2S smells like. But I still don't know what rotten eggs smell like either.

      Sorry ; running irritation at work ; people claiming to know things which they don't know.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    13. Re:or... by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      I said not one darn thing about H2S, did I? This was a faint whiff of SO2, not the full on stuff. I was a kid before chemistry sets got safe, I know what SO2 smells like in quantity. Whatever the smell was, it was the same, and I'm pretty sure it was extremely dilute SO2

    14. Re:or... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Fine - then the "oil-sulphur" mix didn't contain sulphur (or contained some other sulphur-containing compound than elemental sulphur ; which is what the name implies it contains).

      As for my rant about H2S : well if you had to deal with as many false alarms as I do, it'd piss you off too. And a large part of the reason for the piss-off, apart from the amount of paperwork that an H2S alarm generates, is that if your operation goes from "possible" to "confirmed" on the sour gas front, then everyone on board the vessel gets told "shave it or get off". Facial hair interferes with the seal of a respirator. I'm happy with that - it's part of "the territory" for me - but some people get all upset, and complain and kick-back and generally there is unhappiness.

      A significant part of that is down to the archaic description ("smells like rotten eggs" ; a referent that very few people have) and the dribbling paranoia that the compound's (undoubted) toxicity induces, which prevents us from actually being able to demonstrate it in the training room.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    15. Re:or... by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      Oil-sulfur plant spray IS just oil and sulfur. It's a fungicide. It also gets mixed with lime in another fungicidal formulation. And here: http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/extoxnet/pyrethrins-ziram/sulfur-ext.html . Especially: "There is slight oxidation of sulfur to the volatile oxide." Apparently the oil-sulfur mix of my youth is no longer recommended, but they would also spray the grove with parathion back then, and that's no longer recommended either.

    16. Re:or... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Oil-sulfur plant spray IS just oil and sulfur. [...] "There is slight oxidation of sulfur to the volatile oxide."

      Hmmm, but dry sulphur is pretty much stable against oxidation. It's stable against atmospheric oxidation on the shorter end of the geological timescale. At least as stable as bone, compared to flesh.

      So, conjecturally, the sulphur is (slightly) soluble in oil. In water ... "The solubility of elemental rhombic sulfur in water is 1.9(±0.6) Ã-- 10^â'8 mole S8Âkg^â'1."(Phosphorous and Sulfur and the Related Elements, Volume 5, Issue 1, 1978)

      I can find references for solubility of sulphur in (various) organic compounds, but I'm not going to spring $39 for the actual paper. Ah, I finally found some numbers for relevant solubilities. And after spending so long trying to find them, I think that I'll file it locally. EDIT : Lameness filter bullshit kicked in ; so I'm going to have to destroy the table. Stupid Slash.

      Solubility of Elemental Sulphur, Linke, 1965[NL]solvent; Solubility (g sulphur / 100g solvent)[NL], at 20degC, at 100 degC, Other temperature[NL]CS2, 41.8, 92, .[NL]CCl4, ., . , 0.86g/ 100g solvent saturated solution at 25degC[NL]Benzene, 1.7, 17.5, .[NL]Linseed oil, 0.6 (at 30deg), ., .[NL]olive oil, 4.3 (at 30deg), ., .[NL]lanoline (anhydrous), 0.38(at 45deg), ., .

      They are some interesting figures : sufficient solubility that I can well see the contact between solid sulphur and the "oil" allowing significant dissolution and the presentation of single S8 moieties (or individual atoms) to atmospheric oxygen at a noticeable rate.

      I'd forgotten about that -modest solubility of sulphur in some organics- until now, to be honest. Though seeing that 10:1 solubility contrast across a domestic temperature range reminds me that I did know of it a long time ago - and consider it as a way of growing crystals of some of the lower-temperature allotropes of sulphur (which can't be grown from the melt).

      Fucking Lameness filter!

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. WE ARE NOW SECURED by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    From time-travelling Anarchists, tossing bombs from the 1860's!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:WE ARE NOW SECURED by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Time-traveling Anarchists, or, say, people who drop pressure-cooker bombs made from fireworks at marathon finish lines?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:WE ARE NOW SECURED by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      ...and people returning from fireworks displays or setting off firecrackers, returning from hunting trips, anyone from Kentucky...

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    3. Re:WE ARE NOW SECURED by turp182 · · Score: 1

      Remember, remember, the 5th of November. Hang on a second, that's not right, it's Cinco de Mayo!!!

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    4. Re:WE ARE NOW SECURED by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Oh, wait, I forgot, we are still in the mode of "stop the specific mode of this each particular attach".

      Blow up building with fertilizer bomb-> must track all sales of fertilizer
      Shoe bomber -> must scan all shoes
      Underwear bomber -> must scan through underwear
      Bomb with black powder -> must start scanning everywhere for black powder
      [originally, I forgot the 'd's, and it read "Bomb with black power -> must start scanning everywhere for black power"] doh
      Bribe TSA agents to let drugs through -> oops, no way to check this, just forget about it.

      Unfortunately, using this method of "prevention" will take hundreds of years, thousands and thousands of different bombs, and the elimination of most every civil liberty you have to "win the war on terrorism".

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    5. Re:WE ARE NOW SECURED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:WE ARE NOW SECURED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fail it, Paul. Your skill is not enough.

  3. Will this be set off by road flares in the trunk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of my car? I remember those give the drug sniffing dogs in high school fits.

  4. NO. by sycodon · · Score: 1

    They purchased Fireworks that contained black powder.

    But that won't stop the morons in Congress from trying to make black powder something that requires a background check.

    And folks like these two chuck-heads will continue to buy fireworks and be completely unaffected by the background checks.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:NO. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure you're the only one that's mentioned anything remotely like that.

    2. Re:NO. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think checking someone's background is a "moron" move? You ok with felons getting guns? Mentally ill?

    3. Re:NO. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the model rocketeers after 9/11........

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:NO. by Molochi · · Score: 1

      Buying large quantities of black powder is already regulated.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    5. Re:NO. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that our only two options are "do something ineffectual" or "do nothing"? Why can't we, I don't know, try and find a solution that actually fucking works?

    6. Re:NO. by sycodon · · Score: 1

      "do something ineffectual" = "do nothing"

      You just feel better about it.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    7. Re:NO. by sycodon · · Score: 1

      No, your comment is a moron move.

      How about we require a background check before you can buy a fucking SUV to escape in?

      Or, before you can post stupid shit on Slashdot.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    8. Re:NO. by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      Already the case where I live in Australia. There is a severe aversion to anything that could be remotely dangerous here. You can't even buy "shopgoods fireworks" (under 40 grams) without public liability insurance, having done several courses and acquiring multiple different licenses.

      First up you have your fireworks contractor license, $330 a year. Want the ability to import fireworks (even those tiny under 40 gram ones) $300 a year. Want to be able to store fireworks? $35 per year under 100kg, $300 for over. Want to be able to transport fireworks? $92 per year per vehicle you want to use.

      Have even one roman candle? (only using that as an example as it's one of the only sort I know from silly youtube videos) that'll be $44,000 and six months jail time thankyou very much.

    9. Re:NO. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think checking someone's background is a "moron" move? You ok with felons getting guns? Mentally ill?

      As a mentally ill felon, I am ok with idiots like you committing suicide.

    10. Re:NO. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "do something ineffectual" = "do nothing"

      You just feel better about it.

      ... and annoy/inconvenience/harass/etc the lawful users as a side benefit....

    11. Re:NO. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      They purchased Fireworks that contained black powder.

      But that won't stop the morons in Congress from trying to make black powder something that requires a background check.

      And folks like these two chuck-heads will continue to buy fireworks and be completely unaffected by the background checks.

      Coming soon! Background checks to buy fireworks.
      That would be a sadly ironic turn of events. People like to toss out the "terrorists have won" line, but here Security Theater will literally keep us from celebrating our freedom.

    12. Re:NO. by Teancum · · Score: 1

      Black powder isn't even all that hard to manufacture. I suppose Congress could outlaw anybody with an outhouse on "national security reasons", as that might be considered "dangerous" as a source of potential Nitrates. Similarly anybody who decides to stockpile wood as that can be turned into charcoal could be considered dangerous as well.

      I've made my own black powder in the past simply to see if it could be made at all, and I used to buy Salt Peter in bulk quantities from my neighborhood pharmacist (something currently much harder to obtain than when I was a kid). I looked up the recipe from an encyclopedia and did a little further experimentation just to see how the proportions of the various ingredients made it burn. All I see legislation like this actually accomplishing is just adding more steps to the process of making a bomb, but it wouldn't stop a determined person from causing harm if they really wanted to do something nasty.

  5. Did Anything Happen in West, Texas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All I keep hearing about is knee jerk reactions to a sad but relatively trivial event in Boston.

    1. Re:Did Anything Happen in West, Texas? by femtobyte · · Score: 0

      What could a self-regulating American --- Texan, even! --- business possibly do worse than turrists? Surely, their own self-interests would prevent them from doing anything truly stupid and dangerous; that's why we don't need government regulators breathing down our necks. Are you some sort of commie, trying to spread lies that the Free Market won't keep us perfectly safe from harm?

    2. Re:Did Anything Happen in West, Texas? by gmanterry · · Score: 2

      All I keep hearing about is knee jerk reactions to a sad but relatively trivial event in Boston.

      That has become the standard government reaction to anything that happens... ban it. A fan, a five pound bag of flour and a match can blow a house up. As soon as some idiot does it you will need a Federal License to buy a pound of flour.

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
  6. Other forms of detection by j-stroy · · Score: 2

    There is an old design for a flint powered detector similar to a more modern piezo-electric black powder detector.

    Lets not forget the BATF detector which supplies its own sample and has a 100% detection rate.

  7. Thank god there are no other kinds of explosives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and that black powder is used solely for nefarious purposes.

  8. False Positives by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Get ready for the massive amounts of false positives. You went to the firing range last Tuesday? Terrorist Scum!

    1. Re:False Positives by He+Who+Has+No+Name · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it keeps ONE CHILD SAFE, we have to throw out all your civil liberties.

    2. Re:False Positives by girlintraining · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Get ready for the massive amounts of false positives. You went to the firing range last Tuesday? Terrorist Scum!

      It detects sulphur. Anyone who has used matches recently will be tagged as well.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    3. Re:False Positives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it keeps ONE CHILD SAFE, we have to throw out all your civil liberties.

      And all the fertilizer for my garden.

      And that whole "Coal Industry"? Ya that's gonna have to get shit-canned as well.

    4. Re:False Positives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It detects sulphur. Anyone who has used matches recently will be tagged as well.

      Judging by what I ate today, if I farted on that sensor it would probably explode.

      http://www.ehow.com/about_5549939_foods-containing-sulfur.html

    5. Re:False Positives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern firearms do not use black powder... but the chemical sniffers detects that already. (Why do they keep calling them bomb sniffers?)

    6. Re:False Positives by Molochi · · Score: 1

      Why are you using black powder? It's messy and corrosive in your 150 year old gun. Use pyrodex or a modern gun that never used black powder instead and they'll only pull you aside if their chem sniffer can detect nitrates. Oh Wait...

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    7. Re:False Positives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wash my face with 5% sulfur twice a day!

    8. Re:False Positives by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      Or if you just went for a soak in some sulfur hotsprings. Or if you're walking home from the store with a bag of Epsom Salt (Magnesium Sulfate) or if you spilled some sulfuric acid on you in the chem lab or... there's got to be a hundred plus sources of sulfur all around us. It's very common.

    9. Re:False Positives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. I once used a duffle bag as a carryon that had in a previous life had been a range bag. The sniffer picked up the nitrocellulose on the bag and let's just say that a TSA agent touched me in ways that I won't let my wife touch me. *shudder*

    10. Re:False Positives by clanrat · · Score: 1

      The best part? You can make black powder without sulphur. It just needs a little more heat to start the reaction.

      http://musketeer.ch/blackpowder/recipe.html

  9. Wow! by bogidu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bullets are made out of black powder? All the ones I've used have been made out of lead or copper. How do those black powder bullets hold together?

    Reporters, please learn the difference between:

    Ammunition and bullets
    Magazines and clips
    Automatic vs Semi-Automatic

    etc, when talking about firearms.

    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey skippy -- lots of stuff for you to take in here, but try to understand.

      the article isn't about firearms and guns at all.

      So, we should let reporters spew absurdities and misinformation because, "Hey, this article isn't about the thing it's attempting to reference"?

      I can't imagine why "news" media in the US is such shit. Oh no, I've no idea why.

    2. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except as it was written, it states bullets are made of black powder which they aren't. On top of that, even if we assume they meant ammunition or rounds they still aren't using black powder anymore. They are using Smokeless powder and have been doing so for many many years.

      This is just another example of not getting the information correct in an attempt to get the information first.

      Also, you can legally buy a binary explosive.. think tannerite (sp?). You mix the parts and now when you shoot it it goes boom. Of course I don't know if it is legally an explosive since it takes a gunshot or equiv. to make it go off.

    3. Re:Wow! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      hey skippy -- lots of stuff for you to take in here, but try to understand.

      the article isn't about firearms and guns at all.

      it's about people making bombs -- TOTALLY different thing

      did you know it's not legal to make a bomb? really!

      Which is curious. Why is it illegal to make a bomb if we have a 2nd Amendment right to "keep and bear Arms?" I think that bombs count at armaments, and while I've seen a lot of interpretations made of the 2nd Amendment - many of which I don't buy into - if you're going to go with the one that keeping personal armaments is permitted for personal defense of liberty against a tyrannical government, why should said armaments be limited to things you can point and shoot? There's nothing in the Constitution that draws a line there that I know of.

      On a practical level, I'm fine with outlawing bombs, considering the havoc people routinely wreak with other weapons, but on a logical level, I can't make sense of it.

    4. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullets are made out of black powder? All the ones I've used have been made out of lead or copper. How do those black powder bullets hold together?

      Reporters, please learn the difference between:

      Ammunition and bullets
      Magazines and clips
      Automatic vs Semi-Automatic

      etc, when talking about firearms.

      The jacket is made of brass, not copper but a copper alloy. Poster, please learn the difference. ;-)

    5. Re:Wow! by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Why is it illegal to make a bomb if we have a 2nd Amendment right to "keep and bear Arms?" I think that bombs count at armaments

      "Arms" != "armaments".

      Though, oddly enough, a muzzleloading cannon is legal (as long as you don't try to sell it), even though a bomb isn't.

      Note also that pretty much any firecracker is a "bomb", if we get down to nitpicking...

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    6. Re:Wow! by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      using Smokeless powder

      As long as we're being pedantic, "Smokeless powder" should be "smokeless powder" since it's a generic term, and "tannerite" should be "Tannerite" since it's a trade name. Obviously Tannerite is an explosive, since it can be made to explode, but it's a tertiary explosive like ANFO. Lastly, ammunition is a very generic term that can include artillery shells, amongst other things, so (assuming you're the OP AC) it would make a lot more sense to talk about "cartridges and bullets" rather than "ammunition and bullets".

      Sheesh, any time firearms are discussed some gun-loving pedant points out, amongst other things, the difference between a magazine and a clip. That's probably the least important distinction I can think of in most such discussions.

  10. One small problem... by BetterSense · · Score: 2

    Black powder is perfectly legal.

    Why should black powder residue constitute probable cause of anything, if possession and use of black powder is actually legal?

    In theory, I could go shooting my historical weapons that use black powder, which is also perfectly legal, or go to a war-between-the-states reenactment, and then walk through downtown Boston. Nevermind, that would be outside the ordinary, prescripted "safe area" of human activity that "most normal people" do, and therefore suspicious and therefore probable cause. Got it.

    1. Re:One small problem... by meerling · · Score: 1

      You're better off using modern replacements for actual black powder, since the corrosive effects of that old sulfer charcoal saltpeter stuff is pretty nasty over time.

    2. Re:One small problem... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're better off using modern replacements for actual black powder, since the corrosive effects of that old sulfer charcoal saltpeter stuff is pretty nasty over time.

      Which is why cleaning your blackpowder firearms THOROUGHLY immediately after use is mandatory.

      My Civil War era revolvers get disassembled and tossed into boiling water soon as I get home. For a start....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re: One small problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used both, and still prefer proper black powder. It is more authentic and the corrosion aspects are a non-issue if you use correct (i.e. period correct) materials and techniques.

    4. Re:One small problem... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Black powder is perfectly legal. Why should black powder residue constitute probable cause of anything, if possession and use of black powder is actually legal?

      Depends on the quantity, probably. The last time I checked, black powder was rated as the highest-risk explosive in our legislature because of its sensitivity to sparks and static electricity. The residue could at least result in them asking you where you got it from, in what quantity, and if you're qualified and licensed to handle it.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re: One small problem... by BetterSense · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You make my point for me. You DO NOT have to "qualified and liscenced" to have black powder. You DO NOT have to tell anyone (cops included) 'where you got it' anymore than you have to tell them where you bought your sneakers. What's the point in detecting something that is perfectly legal?

      It's sulphur, salpeter and charcoal.

    6. Re:One small problem... by Molochi · · Score: 1

      Mind you those replacements use a nitro base. So you're still screwed IF this is going to happen. But it is better for your gun.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    7. Re: One small problem... by cffrost · · Score: 2

      What's the point in detecting something that is perfectly legal?

      Much like police dogs that "alert" based of the whims of their handlers, this technology will likely be useful for creating "probable cause" against anyone who's been in direct or indirect contact with some sulfur-containing materials.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    8. Re:One small problem... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      the modern replacements to be used in black powder weapons also contain black powder and are corrosive and caustic too. Pyrodex for example has black powder plus graphite and some other interesting things; it is less sensitive and safe than black powder but still dangerous and having many the bad characteristics. you still have to wash your gun afterwards (yes, hot soapy near-boiling water).

    9. Re:One small problem... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      eh, you can't use modern smokeless in a black powder weapon. the replacements for black powder contain black powder plus other ingredients.

    10. Re:One small problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe nowadays it is preferable to refer to it as African-American powder.

  11. So if you cut up onions before flying... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    ...Wash your hands very, very thoroughly.

    And whatever you do DON"T FART while going through security.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  12. Sulfur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't sulfur a fairly common element in some household products? I mean, any nerd could tell you it's the active ingredient in some acne cremes...

  13. Yay for false positives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This thing's going to pick up a lot of innocent gardeners who sprinkled sulfur on their plants to kill mold, or who got some fertilizer on their hands.

  14. Get Facts straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sigh.. Black powder is not used in bullets.

    A Bullets is the projectile that is fired and is normally made of lead although some have a steel core and other metals but there is no black powder in there.

    Even the powder that is used in the round to propel the bullet isn't black powder. Modern ammunition uses smokeless powder and not black powder, aka gun powder.

  15. And when black powder becomes illegal.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next, governments will move to ban purchases of Diet Coke and packs of Mentos. Anyone caught purchasing large amounts of each will be arrested for conspiring to create an active volcano.

    1. Re:And when black powder becomes illegal.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or PVC pipe...you can make potato cannons out of them! The right projectile...you've got a pretty substantial weapon...

  16. this would have prevented the boston bombing how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh right..it wouldn't have.

  17. More niggling by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'd hate to come across as pedantic, but...

    An ammunition cartridge is composed primarily of:
    Bullet: The projectile that is ejected from the muzzle of the firearm at high speed.
    Propellant: The chemical explosive that is burned to propel the bullet.
    Primer: The component that chemically generates heat when struck with sufficient force, igniting the propellant.
    Casing: Just what it sounds like, the part that holds everything together.

    Now, to keep this from being entirely off-topic...
    Modern ammunition cartridges do not contain black powder. They contain smokeless powder. Much like "clips" and "magazines", or "diesel" and "gasoline", these are two different things that are not interchangeable.

    --
    Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    1. Re:More niggling by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Since we're being pedantic, you could actually interchange black and smokeless powder in some modern cartridges for some firearms - e.g. .38 Special out of a revolver.

    2. Re:More niggling by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Modern ammunition cartridges do not contain black powder [wikipedia.org]. They contain smokeless powder [wikipedia.org]. Much like "clips" and "magazines", or "diesel" and "gasoline", these are two different things that are not interchangeable.

      A slight quibble:

      blackpowder can be loaded into any casing and will work just fine (for certain values of fine - be VERY careful about loading). Note that the .45-70 cartridge was originally blackpowder, is now smokeless powder, but is the same size cartridge it always was, so can be loaded quite safely with 70 grains of black powder instead of whatever amount of smokeless it comes out of the box with.

      Note that the above quibble really only matters to the few of us who own replicas of the 1873 Springfield .45-70 cavalry carbine (7th Cavalry used them at Little Big Horn, for reference) and feel the incredible urge to foul the barrels of our carbines for a more "realistic feel"....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  18. Less than worthless by gweihir · · Score: 4, Informative

    Black powder can be found almost everywhere, even in societies that do not have a gun-fetish. Every little firecracker has it in it. These detectors would cause so many false positives as to be not only absolutely worthless, they would have negative value as they waste massive amounts of resources.

    But I get it, the US administration, and under its tutoring the US population, have lost all rationality when it comes to "terrorism" a long time ago. The next bombing (and it will happen) will just cause as much useless actionism and more steps towards a police-state as this one did. And if it takes too long for the next bombing to happen, the FBI will arrange a fake one, as they have done several times before.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Less than worthless by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Black powder can be found almost everywhere, even in societies that do not have a gun-fetish.

      What does a "gun-fetish" have to do with it?

      Black powder isn't used in any commercial cartridges that I know of, and the overwhelming majority of gun owners don't own or use black powder for anything but their Fourth of July fireworks.

      It's mostly used by reenactors of various sorts, with muzzle-loading muskets/rifles/pistols/revolvers, and bought by the pound (I've got the best part of a pound in my ammo safe).

      Though, frankly, making it is not so difficult as all that.....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:Less than worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next bombing (and it will happen) will just cause as much useless actionism and more steps towards a police-state as this one did.

      What actions towards a police state did this one cause? Your cognitive biases are causing you to see things where there is nothing.

    3. Re:Less than worthless by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I have no cognitive bias here. I got a pretty good understanding how the 3rd Reich, Stalinism and the DDR worked in school. There is quite a bit more than "nothing" and it is in an advanced stage.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:Less than worthless by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Some states already ban firecrackers to protect the children. It's just common sense, and the rest of country will have to advance.

    5. Re:Less than worthless by baKanale · · Score: 1

      Well, New York City Mayor Bloomberg has openly said that we need to change our laws and the way we interpret the Constitution, for one. Give it some more time and I'm sure more of the same will crop up. http://politicker.com/2013/04/bloomberg-says-post-boston-interpretation-of-the-constitution-will-have-to-change/

    6. Re:Less than worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, New York City Mayor Bloomberg has openly said that we need to change our laws and the way we interpret the Constitution, for one.

      Fortunately, Bloomberg is seen by most of the world for what he is :

      an annoying busybody Jewboy who has a problem keeping his big Jewboy
      nose out of placers where he doesn't belong. If he came out to Idaho and tried to
      tell us how to live, he would be fed to the hogs.

  19. false positives? by houghi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This would be great to create false positives. Just sprinkle some on random people to create as many false positives as possible.
    Then when they turn the system off, do some small attack and then when they turn it back on, start with the false positives again.

    remember: terrorism isn't about killing people, it is about spreading terror. The actual limiting of peoples freedom will be done in congress. Installing this means the terrorists have won.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:false positives? by nicoleb_x · · Score: 1

      Yep, just stand by the elevator in the parking garage at the airport and unravel a few firecrackers and then walk over to the security line and fire up the video camera for some laughs.

    2. Re:false positives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spread it on some rats.. Watch them tear up the streets with backhoes.

    3. Re:false positives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Installing this means the terrorists have won.

      Oh, I think that ship had sailed many years ago. Unlawful and indefinite detention + undeterred bombing of several countries means that the terrorists have won.
      this is just terrorists spiking the ball...

    4. Re:false positives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Came here to say this. Can't read TFA as it times out, but reading between the lines they're looking for sulfur. Can't see any reason why you'd be arrested for carrying a leaky sack o' sulfur, even if they know you're doing it to make false positives and you'll be watched. So the terrorists would just have to give some kid $10, a leaky SoS, and have them go about their way.

  20. Black Powder comes in 50 gallon drums now?! by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1

    Get Jerry on the line!

    Tell him to dump my entire warehouse--300 hogsheads--of the powder in the river and go out and buy replacement drums right away!

    (rubs hands together)

    I'm going to make...(extreme closeup)...a killing!

    --
    Yeah, right.
  21. Now there's a joke by meerling · · Score: 2

    Black powder is an ancient explosive, not to mention easy and cheap to make. We even did it in one of my science classes.
    (Sure, that was back in the 80s when chemistry in a science class meant you actually mixed and tested various chemicals instead of just watching a video on the structure of polymers as it pertains to the plastics industry, but still.)
    Also, gunpowder is not that powerful, and there are plenty of others with more bang that are nearly as easy to make.

    Bet those sensors go absolutely berserk during July. :p

    Of course, if someone wanted to cause trouble, just toss a handful of power into the wind blowing on a crowd anywhere they have those sensors.
    Any security system that can be so easily swamped with false positives (the false positive is not that the gunpowder was detected, but rather that they were a threat, had anything to do with it, or had any knowledge regarding it at all.
    And that's assuming it's only going off on gunpowder, because if it goes off on sulfur, even an egg salad sandwich or certain types of antibiotics could cause a lockdown. How many of those will occur before someone realizes that trying to detect a common element is not security.

    1. Re:Now there's a joke by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      How many of those will occur before someone realizes that trying to detect a common element is not security.

      Rationality hasn't slowed much less stopped the long lines, groupings, delays that people go through at airports, train stations, concerts, sporting events, etc. Expect the same kind of lines and checks at "public" events in the future. People collecting in any form is bad for the powers that be. They might start talking, or heaven forbid, exchanging ideas. For us "oldsters" who remember society in the sixties, compared to where we are now in terms of repression, it's just one more small step to get there.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
  22. TSA by gregulator · · Score: 1

    So what the hell do the puffer scanners at the airport scan for??? Nukes?

    1. Re:TSA by mhotchin · · Score: 1

      Nitrogen compounds - the basis for almost all modern explosives.

  23. before too many things need to be unsaid... by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    Just hang on a minute.

    "Smokeless powder" (nitrocellulose) pretty much replaced gunpowder (sulfer, charcoal, and potassium nitrate) in firearms over an hundred years ago, except for historical reproductions. And even those replicas of old firearms largely use alternative propellants that are engineered to have the same bang per volume of gunpowder (as the propellant is measured by volume during reloading). The "gunpowder" in fireworks is not the same propellant used in modern firearms. Equating the two could lead to some confusion. This distinction will be entirely lost on the congressional floor, but as nerds, we should be aware of it.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  24. Too much Hollywood by slew · · Score: 3

    What this appears to be talking about is how at the airport they now swab your carry-on luggage and put it in a machine. I don't think these boston folks would have been though any "swabing" checkpoint so the existance of a device that did this probably would not have made anyone "safer" in this case (or any similar non-airport/govt-building checkpoint situation).

    For those curious, the idea behind an IMS (ion mobility spectrometer), is that you ionize your sample (well sort of, you have water or other liquid vapor with ions dissolved in it, not just pure ions in air or in a vaccum) and waft them into a drift tube and use fact that these ionized vapors have slightly different masses so they have different mobility under an electric field. The "spectra" of the mobility under this electric field helps to identify the original chemicals in the swab.

    The specific problem they are trying to solve with black powder is that the ions formed by Sulphur (atomic mass 32) and Oxygen (atomic mass 16) are very difficult to disambiguate for a clean detection signal (since O2n- and S1n- have about the same mass).

    The common method of disamgibuating is to add solvents or chemical reagents before ionization. AFAIK, in the case of Oxygen interference, a common way to change the ionic signature is to add dichlorolmethane CH2CL2 and the resulting reaction usually exchanges O2- ions for CL- ions (which is enough different than sulphur ion to make it easy to detect), but unfortuantly, dichloromethane also has a side effect of inhibiting the formation of various Sulphur ion allotropes (i.e., different number of sulphur atoms in the ion). So these folks apparently came up with a technique where you ionize first (avoiding the problem with CH2CL2 and sulphur ion formation) and then pass all the ions through a CH2CL2 "titration region" in the drift tube (effectively replacing many of O2- ions that mask the sulphur ion signature with Cl- ions).

    Of course the devil is in the details which I haven't read about yet...

    1. Re:Too much Hollywood by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      the idea behind an IMS (ion mobility spectrometer), is that you ionize

      Thank you. That's a hell of lot more interesting and informative than the bazillionth gun pedant pointing out the difference between a clip and a magazine.

  25. sulfur isn't necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can make a similar bomb propellant without sulfur. black powder being Potassium Nitrate, carbon & sulfur. The carbon and sulfur and be replaced with other material (ie: sucrose) for similar results.
    a detector for certain nitrate compounds would be much more useful.

  26. But.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blackpowder is legal....

    1. Re:But.. by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Blackpowder is legal....

      So are knives, but you can't carry one onto a plane unless you get it from one of the numerous restaurants that are past the security checkpoints. Make sure you order a tough steak so you can get a big steak knife, of just have your accomplice in the kitchen give you a carving knife. Heck, maybe you can get 'em at the gift shop.

      Security theater marches on! Apparently the Boston bombers actually used black powder, which just goes to show that (fortunately) they weren't better bomb makers. Smokeless powder is also perfectly legal (used largely by ammo reloaders) and much more powerful. Detecting black powder is not of much use, because somebody able to smuggle a bomb on an airplane would almost certainly use something better. I've never heard of black powder being used in such a bomb.

    2. Re:But.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hell, they could have purchased a fertilizer factory in Texas and blown up a whole damn town legally.

  27. Does it happen to find golf balls too? by Tomsk70 · · Score: 2

    I hear there's quite a market for them.

    1. Re:Does it happen to find golf balls too? by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      Maybe they will even sell versions that detect ivory.
      But black powder was popular in Guy Fawke's days. Nobody has caused significant damage with minor quantities of black powder for the past 50 years. Nevertheless politicos will go into headless chicken mode an money bins will be built.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
  28. Several attacks a decade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we are going to spend $billions, curtail individual liberty and privacy expectations; to do nothing about something we couldn't stop if we had to.

    We are such tools.

  29. So... by msauve · · Score: 1

    Don't light any matches or eat any eggs before flying.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  30. Black Powder? by Molochi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just a side note because it's making me nerdrage :) TFA asserts "Used in fireworks and bullets, the explosive substance is both deadly and widely available." Assuming that they are actually talking about "black powder" I think this was an included invention by the writer.

    Manufactured ammunition (with a very few niche and very expensive exceptions) hasn't used "black powder" for its loads for over 100 years. Modern ammo uses "smokeless" powders with a variety of chemical compositions based around nitroglycerin and 1or 2 other nitro based chemicals. These should be easily detectable with existing sniffers that are looking for nitrates. So if a day on the range was going to get me hauled in at the TSA line, well were already past that.

    Pyrodex and other Black Powder substitutes are more commonly used by muzzleloader hunters and Pyrodex is "smokeless powder" based and formulated for the lower power of black powder explosions. I should also be easily detectable.

    Garden variety "buy it a supermarket go-bang fireworks" use perchlorate based fuel as far as I know. I don't know how detectable it is or how chemically similar it is to black powder off the top of my head. But I'd guess it's not and would prefer it to be detectable.

    On the other hand I CAN buy black powder by the 16oz can with cash. I think it would be good thing if the chemsniffers could detect it.

    --
    "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    1. Re:Black Powder? by techsimian · · Score: 1

      Bullets have never been made of black powder. The bullet is the metal tip (or ball whne they actually used black powder)

    2. Re:Black Powder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderated +1 sheldon cooper...

    3. Re:Black Powder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't anyone watch Mythbusters?

  31. Re:I use sulfur as a fungicid by Molochi · · Score: 1

    Maybe. But the detectors already work against the stuff in "bullets" (because black powder isn't actually used in ammo) and fertilizer. So you're already screwed.

    --
    "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  32. Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've made black powder with charcoal I made from trees I planted.

    If you think KNO3 or S is a problem, wait til folks drive by the dropoff
    and dust the ground.

    Maybe you shouldn't make such enemies.

    Rome didn't collapse in a day.
    Folks in glass empires ought not fly drones.

  33. Model rockets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder what this means for the hobby of model rocketry?

    1. Re:Model rockets by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Wonder what this means for the hobby of model rocketry?

      Nothing bad - they have a wonderful model rocketry range at Gitmo.

    2. Re:Model rockets by jddj · · Score: 1

      We had a model rocket birthday party for my son (turned 5). We pre-built a number of bulk-pack rockets, had the guests decorate them, took them out for a launch.

      We made sure to warn parents that if they were flying soon, they would want us to handle the engines and post-launch rockets, for fear of the glorified mall-cops that are "protecting" us at the airport.

      Little did we know that black powder was hard to detect. Guess that's changed now.

      One reason that the hobby is waning: regulations that make it nearly impossible to launch rockets in/near a major metro area.

      When I was a kid, I could launch on the ball fields of any of several local elementary and junior high schools. Now there's a single local park in our city of 4 million people where I can launch rockets on public land without going to the pokey.

  34. Pointless - there were already bomb-sniffing dogs by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There were bomb-sniffing dogs working the marathon - they were pulled once the elite runners had gone through and the dignitaries had left.

  35. hard to make by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, making "good" black powder isn't easy. Any idiot can mix sulfur, sodium nitrate and charcoal and make a sort of rapidly burning mixture. But it wouldn't be real black powder. You need to mix them and grind them together (a nontrivial process if you don't want to have it ignite), then you mix it with the right amount of water, make a paste, let it dry into a solid cake, then break the cake up in a way that makes nice sharp edged particles, as opposed to just grinding it into spherical dust particles.

    I suspect that the bare mixture would probably work in an improvised device, but so would sugar and perchlorate, or Pyrodex, or SolidOx and fuel or.. you get the idea.. The idiots bombing abortion clinics used to favor fire extinguishers as their pressure vessel. A bit more expensive than a pressure cooker, but a lot less conspicuous. And they favored chlorate/fuel mixtures.

    1. Re:hard to make by lemur3 · · Score: 1

      yeah, whatever.

      ask the GORN CAPTAIN if the powder kirk made was any good!

  36. Model rockets may be dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are several issues that are coming together to end the hobby of model rocketry forever. Combined with a waining interest in the hobby has resulted in Estes creating new product lines.

    Years from now, don't expect to take your grandkids out to the local field to launch mosquitoes.

  37. Detecting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what is it detecting? The blurb says oxygen and sulfur. Well oxygen is impossible to avoid and sulfur is easy to get. Sulfur is used as a pesticide/insecticide/parasiticide. Sulphur dioxide is used as a preservative in dried foods, so anyone careful (cheap?) enough to bring their own snacks will be targeted. Any toddler with a dirty nappy (US-ians: diaper) might trigger the detector. Given how TSA agents treat adults, I hate to think what they will do to a toddler. An earlier post mentioned eggs and antibiotics, so I will add garlic to the list of triggers. Plus as already mentioned, a prepared bomber can contaminate the area with sulfur so dogs and machines will be useless.

  38. Musket-Carrying Terrorists ... by littlewink · · Score: 1

    tremble in fear, knowing that their single shot may never be fired. Cap-N-ball conspiracists will be doomed to failure. Ahhh, technology, the Prozac of the masses.

  39. FBI Arranged Fake Bombings? When? by littlewink · · Score: 1

    "the FBI will arrange a fake one, as they have done several times before."

    When? Where? Cite?

  40. Re: "Black Powder" and "bullets" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. If you're going to write about something, get the fucking nomenclature right.