Slashdot Mirror


India Rolls Out Central Monitoring System To Snoop On All Communications

hypnosec tipped us to news that India is rolling out a new intrusive monitoring system, using the authority of a 2000 telecom law. Quoting The Times of India: "However, Pavan Duggal, a Supreme Court advocate specialising in cyberlaw, said the government has given itself unprecedented powers to monitor private Internet records of citizens. 'This system is capable of abuse,' he said. The Central Monitoring System, being set up by the Centre for Development of Telematics, plugs into telecom gear and gives central and state investigative agencies a single point of access to call records, text messages, and emails as well as the geographical location of individuals." Privacy advocates are worried about abuse, partially because India has no effective privacy legislation, and the "...Indian government under PM Manmohan Singh has taken an increasingly uncompromising stance when it comes to online freedoms, with the stated aim usually to preserve social order and national security or fight 'harmful' defamation."

45 of 87 comments (clear)

  1. Stole our secrets by coinreturn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Copycats! The US Government has been doing that for years.

    1. Re:Stole our secrets by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      We've always been at war with Eurasia.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Stole our secrets by gmuslera · · Score: 2

      At least India is not the central hub that connects most of the regions of the world, nor the country that hosts most of the global sites. In US privacy legislation protects at best (anyway, diminishing) privacy of US citizens, but there is no protection of any kind for people from the rest of the world. They have free shot permission over them.

    3. Re:Stole our secrets by davydagger · · Score: 1

      And Oceania and Eastasia

      more specificly Air Strip One.

  2. Well at least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well at least India is open about spying on their own citizens.

    1. Re:Well at least... by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They'll be spying on you, too. You have no idea exactly how much stuff is outsourced to India. Well, now it's all fair game.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re: Well at least... by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      France: "In WWII, we lose! In Algeria, we lose! In Dien Bien Phu, we lose! But on the internet, we don't lose!"

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    3. Re: Well at least... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yup, so now it will be the US government AND the Indian government.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  3. India Rolls Out Monitoring To Snoop Communications by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2, Informative

    So do you mean India does officially what the US does unofficially ?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  4. Re:This is necessary to defeat terrorists. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did you miss the bit where proper controls and judicial oversight aren't in place?

  5. as an american by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    i can offer some perspective to India. At first the whole thing seems a bit absurd and draconian, you might even be outraged over it. eventually stuff like this just becomes routine enough to find its way into inane stuff like farm subsidy bills, and aside from the occaional GPS device snuck onto some college kids car you really dont notice it at all. After a while you start to actively ignore the fact that your country runs secret torture camps and foreign prisons for people who say or do the wrong things. Finally you just stop challenging it alltogether and praise it as being something, hell anything your highly factioned, ineffective government can unilaterally agree upon as passable legislation. after a few years and high profile criminal acts like shootings and bombings, you begin to look back and conclude the entire spy-on-everyone thing as being a hopelessly useless effort on the part of the government to keep no one safe.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:as an american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And the best part is people who still complain after relentless snooping becomes de rigueur just vanish from public discourse.

      Isn't that great!

    2. Re:as an american by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is one of the most depressing things I've read in a while.

      It's pretty accurate, but it's depressing as hell.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  6. Ah, those primitives by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ahahahaha, I love it when some shithole 3rd world insolvent country rolls out a new method to keep control of its teeming masses.

    Maybe instead of trying to watch everyone all the time like a giant prison ward, they'd be more successful at preventing sedition by I dunno, maybe making their country a better place to live so people wouldn't be so angry all the time?

    They could start by - instead of their parliament and grand poobah (or whatever they're both called) wasting their efforts on trivial political point-scoring against each other all the goddamn time - passing a fucking budget since they haven't passed one in the last 4 years?

    Wait, are we still talking about India?

    --
    -Styopa
  7. Google by tapspace · · Score: 2

    The government is inefficient, that's why, here in the US, we've privatized it!

  8. Progress? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Meanwhile 600 million Indians still have to schlep down to the nearest river or railway to take a dump in the morning because there aren't enough toilets for everyone. But I'm glad they've got their priorities straight.

    1. Re:Progress? by zmaragdus · · Score: 2

      Because if the people clamoring for basic amenities like clean water are silenced, no one will know that they don't have clean water.

      --
      (((dB)))
  9. Re:This is necessary to defeat terrorists. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    Bah, details!

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  10. Re:This is necessary to defeat terrorists. by minogully · · Score: 1

    If people incorrectly call Native Americans, "Indians", what would they call Native Indians?

  11. Re:This is necessary to defeat terrorists. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    As long as proper encrypted communication protocols and communications tools with source code available for peer review are in place, there really is no problem with this.

    There, fixed that for ya'.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  12. Re:This is necessary to defeat terrorists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    call center employees

  13. Repressive much? by Murdoch5 · · Score: 2

    I know in actual fact that the US and Canada aren't much better for tracking communications but at least the governments don't come right out and say it. How can you deny people the right to free speech? When you can go to jail simply by speaking your mind or taking liberty to view a document / picture then we have a problem.

    The internet is an open resource and it should stay that way, just because you can find offensive content doesn't mean it should be blocked. What offends you won't always offend me and vice verse, if you don't like what you see then stop viewing it, but to have an entire country force censorship and monitoring on there people is just sad.

    1. Re:Repressive much? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      I know in actual fact that the US and Canada aren't much better for tracking communications but at least the governments don't come right out and say it.

      I think it's better if they do come right out and say it. Then there is no doubt that the government is suppressing freedom of speech, instead of getting mired in endless debates about whether they are or it's just a conspiracy theory.

    2. Re:Repressive much? by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      I would prefer to just falsely believe my freedoms are in tact. I know it's completely illogical to assume such a thing but physiologically it makes me feel better.

  14. So now all tech support calls are monitored? by oic0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So now every tech support call in the world is monitored by the indian government? If I defame their leaders while on the phone with Dell, will their be consequences?

    1. Re:So now all tech support calls are monitored? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Informative

      So now every tech support call in the world is monitored by the indian government? If I defame their leaders while on the phone with Dell, will their be consequences?

      "Hello, this is Steve at Dell 'Support' in not-Bangalore, I'm afraid that the replacement motherboard for your system has been accused of injuring religious feelings and offenses against public order. We will provide you with new tracking number when they are finished 'refurbishing' it in the basement of the interior ministry."

  15. This is a priority? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Of all the things India needs to spend money on right now I'd put this near the bottom of the list.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  16. Re:India Rolls Out Monitoring To Snoop Communicati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So do you mean India does officially what the US does unofficially ?

    No. The US government doesn't do that, the article you linked to is a bunch of bullshit fearmongering by people with no knowledge or insight into how the communications industry works.
    Specifically, the US has the capability to sniff International communications only. When it comes to domestic communications, the only way they can get access is either to submit a warrant for a CALEA tap, which mirrors specific phone numbers over a trunk to a local LE facility, or submit a subpoena to have the Telco/ISP turn over records. They do not have any kind of pervasive monitoring ability and even if they wanted it there's no common point of intercept.
    What India is talking about doing is installing pervasive monitoring gear at every ISP and telco which would allow real-time government traffic snooping, the US does not do this.

  17. Re:India Rolls Out Monitoring To Snoop Communicati by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

    U.S. Marshall ... does not believe in conspiracy theories. But is pissed at the direction this government is going.

    The Bill of Rights. How quaintly old school. What nonsense did they teach about that back when he was in school?

  18. Social Order by PPH · · Score: 1

    That's a buzzword from back in India's socialist days. I guess the free market, democracy talk is just all a bunch of bullshit.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Social Order by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I just came here to say this sounds a lot like China's "Social Harmony."

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  19. Could be a good thing by Richy_T · · Score: 2

    Maybe we'll actually start to see implementation the end-to-end encryption that should have been there on everything from the beginning*.

    *Admittedly, it wasn't really practical in the beginning but those days are long past

  20. Re:This is necessary to defeat terrorists. by fazey · · Score: 1

    they are typically referred to as "east indians".

  21. Re:This is necessary to defeat terrorists. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    "Is it legal"

    "I will make it legal"

    Legality is the cloak of tyranny. It always becomes legal, that which tyrants need to rule. And before some leftwing nut quotes this, I'll do it for you.“They’ll warn that tyranny is always lurking just around the corner. You should reject these voices.” -Says the man trying to remove the restraints against tyranny.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  22. Power and control by cheap.computer · · Score: 1

    China pretty much does the same thing, they even block incoming and outgoing traffic through their "Great Fire Wall". In a nation state like India, which is a union of essentially 24 different cultures, the only way the govt found to keep people together and stay as one country is through coercion, and free people might not let that happen. Given a chance India will split into 500+ princely states like before independence from the British. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_princely_states_of_India

    1. Re:Power and control by jma05 · · Score: 1

      Duuuude. I am assuming you are a Pakistani who still gets fed this propaganda, because nobody in India cares about Khalistan anymore. After that dark period of violence, the Sikhs have been well integrated. We cannot imagine India without them. Of all the states, they now have the most popular culture. Mine does not even register. We love everything about them. Get over it.

    2. Re:Power and control by jma05 · · Score: 1

      I had a Sikh roommate for 3 years and many Sikh classmates at the university. They were about as religious as non-Sikhs (my roommate was more religious), respectful and never bothered women. I am sorry to hear that your experiences fared worse. Alcohol? My roommate did not want to be in the room if I used a bouillon sachet with chicken extract that I had to stop. Neither of us ever touched liquors (not for religious reasons in my case).

      So what if some Sikh youths are not religious and are hedonistic. Is this a “No true Scotsman” argument? Isn’t it normal in a modern society for youths to be less religious and grow more religious as they get closer to their mortality? Isn’t there room for cultural Sikhs/Hindus etc. who don’t place any emphasis on the supernatural?

      My roommate brought up Sardar jokes on perhaps a couple of occasions. It’s OK in my book for Kushwanth Singh to tell Sardar jokes, for Russell Peters to tell Indian jokes and for Jon Stewart to tell Jewish jokes. Never heard of Santa Banta Ha-Ha-Ha till now. I did read of bara bajje jokes in a Kushwant Singh book.

      What exactly does Khalistan achieve? What will it allow Sikhs to do that they cannot now? Impose a state religion? Is that the teaching of the gurus? (I read Sikh scriptures, here and there. I liked their open philosophical views which I thought were quite compatible with a modern society)

      India is not yet a developed country. People of such regions are better off organized into large countries, as long as there is a fair constitution in effect. When splintered, they simply get taken advantage of on the world stage. While not robust, India has better leverage due to its size in ways that its neighbors (Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal) of similar development levels do not have. For richer countries, size matters less.

  23. Re:India Rolls Out Monitoring To Snoop Communicati by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Indeed. Didn't read the link deeply enough... should be logically flamebait-ed :-)

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  24. Selling data to foreign secret services by Andyupnorth · · Score: 1

    Selling the information to the CIA, MI6, Mossad, etc may partially help to pay for the Central Monitoring System... Oh, who am I kidding? It'll go straight to the pockets of a few insider employees.

  25. IP and Outsourcing by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

    If I had a company that outsourced development of my product to India, I'd be pretty nervous.

    1. Re:IP and Outsourcing by zmaragdus · · Score: 1

      Why? There are tons of companies that already outsource products to China, and they don't seem to be worried about it. Proprietary information and trade secrets? Not anymore thanks to the plethora of hackers out there itching to get their fingers on it and give it to their bosses for a pat on the back. The only difference I see is that the Indian government is being forthright about their monitoring, while other countries throw up the "No we're not! You can't prove it!" excuse.

      --
      (((dB)))
  26. Placation 101, crosslisted as Dictatorship 101 by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > with thestated aim usually to preserve social order

    I do believe this is the reason dictators give.

    >and national security

    Hmmm. Maybe it's about memes to placate sufficient quantities of the masses.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Placation 101, crosslisted as Dictatorship 101 by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      > with thestated aim usually to preserve social order

      I do believe this is the reason dictators give.

      While I am not convinced that central snooping is necessary for that, we have to admit that it may be a real challenge to keep social order in a country with multiple languages, religions and ethnic groups, and huge wealth differences. In fact I always admired that India managed to remain a democratic nation, given the challenges it faces.

  27. Re:Wait india has internet? by jma05 · · Score: 2

    I will respond to this obvious troll since there is an informational opportunity. I went for gratis Internet classes in 1996 (gopher, veronica, archie - remember them?). The cybercafes were in full force by 1998.

    Cheapest unlimited & WiFi Internet access now is $5/month. Rural areas get cheaper rates. Smartphone Internet plans are at $4/month. In India, even a poor man on a bicycle can afford a mobile phone. I know people in huts who have 3 of them (no, they are not being spendy). Unlike US, there actually is a free market when it comes to telecom and even the dirt poor of us can afford it.

  28. And by NewYork · · Score: 1

    99% Indians are living off the grid