Slashdot Mirror


New 'Academic Redshirt' For Engineering Undergrads at UW

vinces99 writes "Redshirting isn't just for athletes anymore. The University of Washington and Washington State University are collaborating on an 'academic redshirt' program that will bring dozens of low-income Washington state high school graduates to the two universities to study engineering in a five-year bachelor's program. The first year will help those incoming freshmen acclimate to university-level courses and workload and prepare to major in an engineering discipline."

147 comments

  1. So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just picture some low income student showing up in a red shirt to a room full of grinning SOBs in yellow and blue.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by iluvcapra · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not the TVTropes Red Shirt*. The other kind.

      *by which we mean "Gold Jumpsuit" to those of us who hold to the TNG/DS9 Order of Things

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    2. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why are they sending all these low-income youngsters to die at Uni?

    3. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look to your left. Now look to your right. One of the three of you won't pass. And frankly, I think we all know which ones.

    4. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Why are they sending all these low-income youngsters to die at Uni?

      LOL...yeah, that was my first thought with the red shirt mention.

      But seriously, isn't this just another euphemism for trying to get more under-qualified students into college? Will this displace other students that worked hard during school, and are more academically qualified for these spots?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Salgak1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, considering the pass rate through Freshman Calc in the Engineering/Science track was only ~60% when **I** was an undergrad in the early 1980s. . . Academic or not, they're Redshirts EITHER way. . . .

    6. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are they sending all these low-income youngsters to die at Uni?

      LOL...yeah, that was my first thought with the red shirt mention.

      But seriously, isn't this just another euphemism for trying to get more under-qualified students into college? Will this displace other students that worked hard during school, and are more academically qualified for these spots?

      In a word: maybe. In more than one word: it will displace students who have it way too fucking easy, with wealthy parents to glide them through their life ensuring that by the time they reach 18 they have mastered exactly one thing: relying on mom and dad (and maybe stepdad). Low-income students are disproportionately likely to not go to college for one reason, and it's sure as shit not that they are "under-qualified". GMAFB.

      Anon because slashdot are some racist assholes. Just sayin'

    7. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I suspect that it depends on what you mean by 'under-qualified'.

      Given that it is a specially designed, five-year, program, with the first year for remedial purposes, it obviously isn't targeting people with good high school educations.

      However, such a program(with its willingness to accept students who went to shitty high schools) would presumably be very well placed to have its pick of talented students whose high schools sucked.

      It remains to be seen if they will adopt sufficiently well refined selection criteria; but given the state of a nontrivial number of high schools, there should be plenty of people out there who aren't nearly prepared for a real college; but who have considerable aptitude.

    8. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think so. If you want to get an engineering degree would you be proud to say you graduated these colleges. I think it puts a taint on a degree from them.

    9. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 2

      Ugh...the only two C's in my undergraduate career were in Engineering Math I & II. It was the damn proofs.

      //Paradoxically, I did well in Discrete Math and Coding Theory...

    10. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      In a word: maybe. In more than one word: it will displace students who have it way too fucking easy, with wealthy parents to glide them through their life ensuring that by the time they reach 18 they have mastered exactly one thing: relying on mom and dad (and maybe stepdad).

      Well, first...I think most people that are going to be dependent on Mom and Dad (let's take only the super wealthy ones you are implying), aren't really going to need to be working terribly hard to make good grades to be qualified for college.

      I'm talking strictly about academically qualified students, regardless of class of upbringing. Sure, everyone in life starts at different levels of life, different levels of caring parents, fiscal issues, regions of country ,and just plain old luck in life.

      Everyone is born with a different set of cards both by living standards and genetics. Fact of life, nothing can be done about that. Some people have to work MUCH harder than other to achieve the same goals.

      If someone is either unlucky, or didn't see fit to embrace and actually fight for a good education, should they be given precedence over the luckier student that did work and learn and earn good academic credentials?

      Does everyone deserve a college education? Does everyone need one? Is it true that the world needs ditch diggers too?

      I don't know all the answers, but I do pose the questions. I do often have difficulty believing and accepting that just because someone has a worst starting spot in life, and didn't make the extra effort to make up for it, they should be given an exception or have standards lowered for competition for any position, academic or otherwise.

      I think it boils down to life is tough, and you have to do the best with the cards you are dealt with in life.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Due to the economics of central banking, the elites are under pressure to continually put pressure to dilute or destroy the value of any wealth that is independently created (read: does not require loans, or some activity which allows one to save and accumulate wealth over time without the use of loans).

      That being said, what they are doing here is simply diluting the value of some pool of skilled labor by pressuring as many "recruits" as they can into being trained for it. They don't really CARE about the large portion that will FAIL, as long as they can get enough passed through (sometimes cajoling the professors and university through political means if needed) that they can dilute and/or destroy the value of EXISTING skilled labor. Then the bargaining power of that EXISTING labor is reduced since the new "market rate" for labor is cheaper. YAY! Cheaper wage slaves for everyone!

      The droolbots that are whisked through on these affirmative action junkets end up in some undemanding low end sector where their "labor costs" are "written off" through creative accounting while they work on some corporate subsidiary that is just a front for "developing" (read: never finishing) stupid pseudo-science or pseudo-engineering pork projects. You know, like Solyndra!

    12. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Given that it is a specially designed, five-year, program, with the first year for remedial purposes, it obviously isn't targeting people with good high school educations.

      While this sounds quite nice and humane....

      My question is, will these people be taking up spots in college that could be readily filled by already qualified students trying to get in??

      Is it fair to displace people already qualified to go that school in order to just grasp at those who had bad luck or for whatever other reason were deal a bad starting hand. If so...why? What makes those people more deserving of getting in than the others?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    13. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are afraid of "dusgrimuhnashun" on teh innaneh, then I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that you like to abuse that excuse way to heavily in life.

    14. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by siwelwerd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny, my math department has to offer dumbed down (i.e. remove most proofs) courses for the engineers, e.g. Matrix Analysis instead of Linear Algebra. Our engineers don't hardly have to know what a proof is.

    15. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by KernelMuncher · · Score: 1

      What makes these people more deserving ? Let's say a good high school school sends 100 students to a university and a really bad one sends 5. Who would you rather have - student 101 from the top high school or the 6th best student from the other ? I'd say it shows a lot more talent to be the top of your class in bad circumstances than to be in the middle of the pack when you've got everything going for you.

    16. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any criteria to gain admittance is arbitrary. Everyone deserves and education.

    17. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by KernelMuncher · · Score: 2

      If the university lowered graduation standards for some students, there would be a taint on the degree. But this case is just the opposite - it's holding the standards high but giving extra help to talent students who come from disadvantaged backgrounds. All of the graduates will still have passed the same courses as in previous years.

    18. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by fche · · Score: 1

      Come on, that ways likes heretical thinking about the wisdom of affirmative action of any kind.

    19. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do engineers need proofs anyway? I say leave the proofs for the Math majors.

    20. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by invid · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered why they changed the color scheme from TOS. Was it because Patrick Stewart decided he looked better in red?

      --
      The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    21. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to find a racist, the only tool you'll need is a mirror.

    22. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's hard to say, from the data I have, whether this is some sort of 'equity' thing, or whether it's a strategic choice to gain access to a more talented student body than they would otherwise be able to attract. Consider the analogy of on the job training and applicant experience: Somebody who went to a crap high school is essentially an inexperienced 'hire'. Somebody who went to a good or excellent one has more relevant experience. Would a company ever consider hiring the less experienced one? Sure, if he were cheaper, or seemed smarter, or both, and they were willing to invest upfront to get what they expected to be a better employee. Would they ever consider hiring the more experienced one? Obviously, he's presumably closer to being up to speed, and his performance more predictable based on past experience.

      University of Washington, per US News, is modestly selective, 58.4% of applicants admitted. Washington State is less selective, 82.5% acceptance. Few schools play in the single-digit-acceptance leagues; but neither figure, especially Washington State, is suggestive of a school that has its pick of whatever students it wants. Hard to say without more data; but it's certainly within the realm of plausible that they suspect the existence of students who are just plain sharper than some of the ones it currently has; but which it can access because competing schools aren't interested in doing the remedial work.

      (Presumably, it also comes down to your position on the relative worth of preparation vs. raw talent. If you suspect much of high school of being dubiously useful babysitting, of only limited relevance to your curriculum, you are really only treating it as a signalling mechanism for talent. If you think it is of considerable use, then you are making a much greater sacrifice in taking on people whose high school years are shot.)

    23. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by tyrione · · Score: 1

      Funny, my math department has to offer dumbed down (i.e. remove most proofs) courses for the engineers, e.g. Matrix Analysis instead of Linear Algebra. Our engineers don't hardly have to know what a proof is.

      I'd question your University's quality of education.

    24. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by neurovish · · Score: 2

      Why should they? Engineers are on the application side of things....they use the existing tools (equations) to build other things. They don't need to know exactly how the tools work as long as they can be trusted to work. The only courses I had that were proof intensive were on the more pure math side of things, linear algebra and number theory, that I took because they sounded interesting and useful. There were some proofs mentioned during lecture for the calc -> diff. eq. and a couple of numerical courses, but we were never tested on them.

    25. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anybody know where I can find a good discussion site for nerds? Slashdot used to be it, but it's been inundated by noncompos (read more Asimov, kids).

      Red shit to a nerd is the guy in ST:TOS who dies in every episode. God damn it, I'm not a fucking jock. I'm a nerd! I don't give two shits about sports and don't expect many other nerds to, either. This is as bad as calling cops LEOs, that always confuses me because I'm a nerd, LEO is low Earth orbit, not a "law enforcement officer."

      So to save the rest of the nerds here from having to google a term that few nerds would know or care about:

      Redshirt (college sports) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshirt_(college_sports)Cached
      SimilarIn United States college athletics, redshirt is a delay or suspension of an athlete's participation in order to lengthen his or her period of eligibility. Typically, a ...

      Almost the opposie of what a nerd would think of.

      You're welcome.

      For those of you who like sports, please get the fuck off of slashdot! THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE A NERD SITE, DAMMIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We don't give a fuck about hockey or cricket or baseball, we care about science and tech. If your acronym or slang conflicts with what nerds think of when we hear it, spell it out!

      "Red shirt," sheesh... I'm surprised the non-nerd submitter didn't confuse there with they're or their. Amazing how many people with two digit IQs come here in the last couple of years. On that note, here's what tl;dr REALLY means: "I am an aliterate". And if you think that was a misspelling, you certainly don't read much; look it up.
      </rant>

      (apologies for the nerd rage)

    26. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      I would hope it is a case of giving natural bright students who have had disadvantages to be given a chance to excel, such as going to a piss poor high school which they could not op out of. This is IL, which means inner city Chicago, and they have some schools which have their hands full providing the bare bones requirements for a High School diploma, never mind the higher end stuff.

    27. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      it is helpful to know some of those "non nerd" terms and meanings if wish to socialize with other co workers.

    28. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by siwelwerd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why should they? Engineers are on the application side of things....they use the existing tools (equations) to build other things. They don't need to know exactly how the tools work as long as they can be trusted to work.

      Teaching students how to do proofs teaches them an abstract way of thinking that is universally applicable to solving open ended problems--problems of the form "Here's point A. Point B is over there. How do we get there?". Not every engineer needs this kind of thinking, but some do, and the best will benefit from it. Some of the greatest engineering feats came from attacking these sorts of problems: "Here we are on Earth. There's the moon. Go put a man on it."

      If you just want to write iPhone apps, you can probably skip the good math classes, but if you want to really learn how to think, take as much as you can. Saying an engineer won't need these kinds of thinking skills because you don't have a specific application in mind for them is the same short-sighted thinking as saying we shouldn't fund basic research if we don't have a clear application in mind before the research is done.

    29. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do often have difficulty believing and accepting that just because someone has a worst starting spot in life, and didn't make the extra effort to make up for it, they should be given an exception or have standards lowered for competition for any position, academic or otherwise.

      I think it boils down to life is tough, and you have to do the best with the cards you are dealt with in life.

      You are making the error-prone assumption that the same amount of effort (aside from external influence) will result in someone from a low-income household ending up in the same place as someone from a high-income household. Statistical evidence would tend to disagree with that. Talent is present in the low-income pool at just the same rate as the high-income pool, and if we sit back and just let the class system decide who wins then everyone loses; potential goes untapped and the undertalented end up running (and fucking up) things.

      Higher education in the US has always been (and will be for some time) about appropriately finding those with talent and allowing them to achieve their full potential. Ditch diggers? 10% of adults lack a high school education; do we need almost 30 million ditch diggers? Less than 25% of adults have a 4 year degree, the argument that we are unduly "stuffing" colleges and universities with too many people is ludicrous. The problem is and always will be "are the right people going to college and are the right people ABLE to go to college".

    30. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Deadstick · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'd question your University's quality of education.

      At least the English department...

    31. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Teaching students how to do proofs teaches them an abstract way of thinking that is universally applicable to solving open ended problems

      You know what else teaches abstracting thinking and problem solving?

      EVERY ENGINEERING COURSE. Seriously, you could point to any one of my engineering courses I took and argue that it helped develop abstract thought and made me better and solving open ended problems. Every god-damned one. Do you remember that engineering class that taught you rote memorization and how to solve problems, but only in this one specific way that was established in a prior class? NO, because they don't teach that class in engineering. This is the sort of bullshit argument that CEOs make when they say they're "realigning their position in the market." It could mean god-damned ANYTHING. It's so open ended as to be meaningless.

      I understand the desire to make college a broad education and not some dumbed down tech-school for programmers. Teaching proofs would help with that, but so would teaching a myriad of other things.

    32. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Teaching students how to do proofs teaches them an abstract way of thinking that is universally applicable to solving open ended problems--problems of the form "Here's point A. Point B is over there. How do we get there?". Not every engineer needs this kind of thinking, but some do,...

      Much more important is that they need to know how the tools WORK and not just what data goes in and comes out. If you don't know how the tools work and what their limiations are, then you can easily get garbage out because you've violated some of the assumptions made in that tool.

      It's one thing to know the simplified equation for doing something, but much more important to know HOW it was simplified and WHAT was left out getting there. Oh, you want to deal with the specific thing that this equation ignores, but you think you should use that equation anyway?

      A perfect example of this is from chemistry dealing with pH of buffer solutions based on the pKa of the buffer. There is a simple equation that you can use to determine the pH. BUT if the buffer dissociates more than a certain amount, that equation is not applicable and you must use the full quadratic equation to get the answer. If you don't realize the limits on the simple version, you don't know when your answer is going to be garbage. You think being wrong is unusual? I even caught the TA for a chemistry class who was TEACHING us these equations using the wrong one, on a quiz, when he marked my full quadratic answer as wrong. (The full quadratic answer is ALWAYS right, it's just more complicated than the simple one.)

      How about oceanography? Is your wave model based on the mild slope equations and you've got discontinuities? Are you in shallow water so you use the shallow water approximation? Are you in a region where diffraction is important and the tool you are using ignores it?

      If you don't know the limitations of a hammer, every problem is a nail.

    33. Re: So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Re: redshirt sports reference.

      I did not know that. While I'm moderately adept at playing sports I've never figured out the appeal of watching other people play a game. But then again, I like watching multiple versions of old plays, where I already know the storyline and outcome. I must be mad.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    34. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      You are making the error-prone assumption that the same amount of effort (aside from external influence) will result in someone from a low-income household ending up in the same place as someone from a high-income household.

      I absolutely do not.

      Re-read what I said. I said everyone starts from different starting blocks in life..is dealt a different set of cards, some have real advantages and it is easy, others, have VERY difficult starting places.

      I've known many who started out in bad neighborhoods, bad parents, low income...and they saw the value of an education and work fucking HARD to get where they were. I've known people that had to work while quite young to help support families where parents were missing or just not interested, and yet they still worked to educate themselves and get out of that environment.

      It is possible. It happens. I applaude that. I would be all for programs and money that promoted that ideal and helped young kids to want to educate themselves. But if they won't do it, or just fuck up one too many times, well....life is tough.

      The problem is and always will be "are the right people going to college and are the right people ABLE to go to college".

      I'd say we are doing fine so far. Are we in a situation where we're seriously having difficulty finding academically qualified applicants to fill every US college we currently have? Are we needing to step out and dig further to help those that aren't quite there just to fill the ranks of our schools currently?

      No?

      If not...then I don't think your argument holds.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    35. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Let's say a good high school school sends 100 students to a university and a really bad one sends 5. Who would you rather have - student 101 from the top high school or the 6th best student from the other ?

      That's easy.

      Pick the one that best qualifies (SAT scores, academic record, best answer on the essay parts of the application, etc).

      Use the metrics that you'd use to accept ANY student...the most qualified gets in no matter which school they came from.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    36. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Come on, that ways likes heretical thinking about the wisdom of affirmative action of any kind.

      Personally? I think we've reached the place in time, to do totally away with any type of affirmative action. No quotas for anything anymore. Everyone on their merit.

      I think the goal for many is to have a color blind world. Well, let's start with being color/sex blind on picking anyone for anything.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    37. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      Someone finally figured out that outfitting your security personal in bright red was maybe no the best idea ever. At least that is what I figured for reasoning.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    38. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Engineers are on the application side of things....they use the existing tools (equations) to build other things. They don't need to know exactly how the tools work as long as they can be trusted to work.

      This presumption is probably what has created the Salem Effect, whereby it's been observed that a lot of engineers are creationists.

      An understanding of pure science will tend to inform and contextualize such beliefs, while a focus on mere "operative" technology seems to encourage engineering types to either oversimplify or overgeneralize complex ideas, and to pontificate way above their weight class on subjects to which they cannot speak with authority.

      This also seems to underly a lot of very, very smart engineers (who should no better) claiming that such-and-such a problem in neurology, evolutionary genetics, or philosophy of the mind is simply a problem of applied $ENGINEERS_DISCIPLINE. (For this, see Ray Kurzweil, an engineer who specializes in pattern recognition, and now sells books about how human consciousness is nothing more than pattern recognition.)

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    39. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The problem is, we don't have good metrics for selecting students. If we did, university admittance would be much easier. We've found that there is very little correlation between students results in their last year at school and their final mark. We have a lot of data at Cambridge because each college has different admittance criteria: none of them consistently manages to pick the best students.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    40. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      This usage is confined to the USA, so 50% (last published numbers) of the audience will have had to look it up. It's one confined to a traditionally non-geeky niche in the USA, so at least half of the remainder will have needed to look it up. When you are using a term that you would anticipate that 75% of your target audience will need to look up, it's generally a good idea to define it.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    41. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Does everyone deserve a college education? Does everyone need one? Is it true that the world needs ditch diggers too?

      Not sure if everybody deserves a college education, but today's society needs more people to have a college education. As we get more automated and make higher valued merchandise, the people needed to develop and run the industries will be needed to have more education than the people before them. A person without a high school degree can't be a ditch digger because these days a ditch digger is going to be put in charge of a $50k ditch digging machine that will do the work of fifty men with shovels in one tenth the time and do it cheaper and better. Manual labor jobs are increasingly becoming rarer and rarer or at least not worth it to pay what people want to be paid for such labor.

    42. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Pope · · Score: 1

      You'd think the Brits would've figured that out during the American Revolution.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    43. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and they don't need to know the proofs. Understanding the first principles underlying them can be useful (eg, how Taylor series relate to Fast Fourier Transforms, for example), but the proofs? Nah. That is what mathematicians are for.

    44. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Understanding how to get humans to the moon was an understood diff eq already. no proof needed. The engineering was in the implementation details, working backwards from getting the humans back to Earth. Knowing the proofs for the orbital mechanics equations, involved, etc, had already been beaten to death, supported by empirical data, simulation, etc.

    45. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least when I went to univ. of washington, math 121 (1st qtr calc) was too late to learn certain things. It really was sucking from the firehose. Having profs with marginal English skills did not help. Nor having 300 studebts in main lecture.
      In other words, the UW is the wrong place to learn study skills and habits if you don't have them already. But the UW already had a big minority assistance program already... anyhow, good for UW & WSU.
      But other high-end schools can also have prep schools too. I would have probably done that if one of the community colleges had been set up something like that. UW does not officially do that...

    46. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False choice always presented by those who believe they have an implied right to be there over someone else. There are 50000+ students at the UW alone (35k undergrads).
      So, what makes YOU more deserving?

    47. Re: So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Know how I know you're white?

    48. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      What most people don't want to admit is that only 30 percent of engineering students end up finishing with a degree in Engineering.

      Obviously, many switch to other programs and finish those degrees, but these are not easy courses, for the most part.

      (not just here, nationwide)

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    49. Re:So... they get eaten by the salt vampire? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If they know the equations by heart, and when not to use them, fine. That's more likely if they understand where the equations come from and why they're true. I've rederived formulas before, by knowing what underlies them.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  2. Hells engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol

  3. Here's how it went. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    College administrator #1: How can we get 5 years of tuition payments from students in exchange for a 4 year degree?
    College administrator #2: How about making them stay longer? We can call it 'academic redshirt.' By likening it to something we do for athletes, it'll make it much more saleable!
    College administrator #1: Fucking brilliant! Here, have a raise! You've earned it!

    1. Re:Here's how it went. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are poor students; they're not paying their own tuition anyway, and they tend to drop out because they're behind in math and other subjects.
      This is a a remedial year to make up for the poor college prep they got from their low-income schools and families.

    2. Re:Here's how it went. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      These are poor students; they're not paying their own tuition anyway

      Doesn't matter if they're paying their own tuition. It matters if *anyone* is paying their tuition. School gets 5 years of taxpayer money instead of 5 years of mom-and-dad money or government-backed loans against the student's future earnings. Or maybe a combination of all of the above. Point is that it doesn't matter. It's 5 years of tuition in any case.

      Not passing judgement on this program, just on the idea that it matters to the school whether they're personally paying.

    3. Re:Here's how it went. by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 2

      These are poor students; they're not paying their own tuition anyway, and they tend to drop out because they're behind in math and other subjects. This is a a remedial year to make up for the poor college prep they got from their low-income schools and families.

      Okay.

      College administrator #1: How can we get 5 years of Pell Grants, student loan money, and cash from the NSF from students in exchange for a 4 year degree?
      College administrator #2: How about making them stay longer? We can call it 'academic redshirt.' By likening it to something we do for athletes, it'll make it much more saleable!
      College administrator #1: Fucking brilliant! Here, have a raise! You've earned it!

      Better?

      (I should say, in spite of the cynicism I share with GP, this doesn't sound like a bad deal for the students.)

    4. Re: Here's how it went. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sallie Ma is paying for the money even if they end of working at McDonalds at min wage they will have there full life to pay back.

    5. Re:Here's how it went. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't sound bad for those students.

      But it also sounds like great party year. I wonder if it will actually help out, or if it will set the stage for a lot of bad habits.

      I know if I didn't really have to try my first year that I'd have partied a lot more than I did. Going from a poor college prep school to a fairly tough school meant that I had to seriously buckle down and get my work done once the first semester kicked my ass.

  4. Redshirts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fodder for the away team?

    1. Re:Redshirts by MrNickname · · Score: 2

      See, never RTFA. Completely shattered my perception that they would all just die in their first year.

  5. Oblig Star Trek (TOS) by stevegee58 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Weren't Red Shirts the Enterprise crew members that were always killed within 60 seconds of their appearance?

    1. Re:Oblig Star Trek (TOS) by OglinTatas · · Score: 1

      Scotty and Uhura had mad survival skills

    2. Re:Oblig Star Trek (TOS) by Kinthelt · · Score: 1

      They also never left the ship in uniform.

      --

      "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

    3. Re:Oblig Star Trek (TOS) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scotty left the ship in uniform several times. He also died once but was resurrected soon after.

    4. Re:Oblig Star Trek (TOS) by johnny5555 · · Score: 1

      Exactly what it brought to mind, for me as well. I wasn't even aware of the other usage for the term.

  6. misuse of the term redshirt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    An athletic "redshirt" means you get to practice with the team but you're not allowed to compete, and it doesn't count as a year of eligibility.

    Are they saying that you get to audit all of your classes as a freshman and then take them for real the next year? If not, then they're probably misusing the term redshirt. If so, then it's "welcome to whose degree is it anyway? the major where everything is made up and the grades don't matter"

    1. Re:misuse of the term redshirt by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1

      Grades shouldn't matter, if the real goal is knowledge.

    2. Re:misuse of the term redshirt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a college professor, and I constantly tell students that grades don't matter... it's the knowledge that matters. E.g. learning things that make you wiser shouldn't depend on whether those things are on the exam. ...and most students still care more about getting grades than actual knowledge.

    3. Re:misuse of the term redshirt by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 2

      Knowledge means nothing if you can't apply it or measure it. Since they are "low income", I would think the true goal is not being "low income". Who is going to hire someone who didn't get good grades but assures you they know a lot? What I worry more about is that they will dumb down the curriculum so they get a high pass rate and everyone has a feel good moment. Until the newly trained "engineers" can't hack it in the working world. As a general rule, if you give someone something, they won't put as much effort as they do when they are paying for it themselves. It doesn't apply to everyone but for example go to most government subsidized housing and count how many are actually maintaining and caring for the home.

    4. Re:misuse of the term redshirt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Who is going to hire someone who didn't get good grades but assures you they know a lot?"

      Who puts their GPA on an Application? Remember, "Cs get Degrees"

    5. Re:misuse of the term redshirt by Frontier+Owner · · Score: 1
      Sounds pretty accurate to me...

      "low income"/"under privlaged"/"didn't bother to pay attention in HS" student pays for a years worth of classes that dont go on their record so they can be up to the level they should be to enter college.

      colleges yet again, lowering their standards.

    6. Re:misuse of the term redshirt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is they were raised in an environment where they are judged by their grades. You're fighting against their entire educational experience.

    7. Re:misuse of the term redshirt by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If you're telling your students that grades don't matter, then you're lying to them. Their grades are going to be important when they try to get their first job. The education is more of a long-term investment - it's something that will benefit them over their entire life. It's important to balance both at university. Make sure that you do enough work to get good grades but, as Mark Twain said, don't let it interfere with your education.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:misuse of the term redshirt by khchung · · Score: 1

      I'm a college professor, and I constantly tell students that grades don't matter... it's the knowledge that matters. E.g. learning things that make you wiser shouldn't depend on whether those things are on the exam. ...and most students still care more about getting grades than actual knowledge.

      I have to question your approach in creating the exam if students with the knowledge are unable to get good grades at it.

      If students who got the actual knowledge cannot get good grades, the problem is YOU.

      How about turning this around, and have your college constantly tell you "Salary doesn't matter, it's doing great research and great teaching that matters!", and then give you great research facility and students, but only give you minimum wage while awarding great bonuses to management. How many professors would care more about getting better pay than actual knowledge?

      --
      Oliver.
    9. Re:misuse of the term redshirt by aiht · · Score: 1

      I'm a college professor, and I constantly tell students that grades don't matter... it's the knowledge that matters. E.g. learning things that make you wiser shouldn't depend on whether those things are on the exam. ...and most students still care more about getting grades than actual knowledge.

      I have to question your approach in creating the exam if students with the knowledge are unable to get good grades at it.

      If students who got the actual knowledge cannot get good grades, the problem is YOU.

      How about turning this around, and have your college constantly tell you "Salary doesn't matter, it's doing great research and great teaching that matters!", and then give you great research facility and students, but only give you minimum wage while awarding great bonuses to management. How many professors would care more about getting better pay than actual knowledge?

      What? Who said the students with knowledge don't get good grades?
      GP is talking about students who don't have full knowledge but still get good grades, because all they care about is targeting the exam.
      Then they forget about it, and leave with the piece of paper but no actual learning.
      (I'm extrapolating here, anonymous prof, based on my own experience; I don't mean to put words in your mouth.)

  7. Did the PR flack check who reads SlashDot... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did the PR flack check who reads SlashDot before they posted something about "red shirts?" I'll bet we have more people who care about the Bajorans than the Trojans here...

    1. Re:Did the PR flack check who reads SlashDot... by Nutria · · Score: 1

      But we also care lots about Engineering.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:Did the PR flack check who reads SlashDot... by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      Only when the Dilithium Crystals are out of alignment and the engines canna take it cap'n.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
    3. Re:Did the PR flack check who reads SlashDot... by Azure+Flash · · Score: 1

      Trojans are a very serious internet security issue. I'm pretty sure a lot of Slashdot users care about Trojans too.

  8. Some advice by CCarrot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just a word of advice to these engineering redshirts; stay well away from the laser lab...and the biology lab, for that matter.

    Really, just don't go there. In fact, try to stay out of those buildings altogether...and make sure everyone knows your last name. :p

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  9. Go Ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, if there is one thing that we need at WSU it is more quota admission CS majors who can't code when they reach the upper class ranks.

    Typical WSU -- not the least bit suspicious that UW thinks that this is a good idea.

  10. MOD PARENT UP PLEASE! by billstewart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thanks for the explanation; many of us here only know the Star Trek definition of red shirt :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP PLEASE! by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      OMG you just went up 5 geek points with that post!

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  11. Low income slow start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a bit confused. So apparently these low income students can't handle real college, so they need a practice year, then skip competitive department admissions? CSE at UW has pretty competitive admissions, and is usually entered on the second year, which is what this program does, but then gives then 4 years in the department instead of 3.

    Perhaps this is a system to help people who can't finish their degree in 4 years, and also can't afford 5 years of classes? I can't find financial detail in the article.

    Anyway, giving long term planning to red shirts just seems like a bad idea. We all know what happens to them.

  12. College prep should be required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of graduating high school students are completely unprepared for college. Programs like these should fill the gap and keep engineering freshmen from failing the "make or break" first year courses. In my university for example, the freshman Engineering Calculus 1 course had an absurdly high failure rate because it was a lecture-based course, completely different from how high school classes are taught. With a teaching grant, one of the professors taught an experimental Engineering Calculus 1 course which was much more similar in format to a traditional high school class setting--and as a result the failure rate dropped dramatically. I hope to see more advances in this area in the future.

    1. Re:College prep should be required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SUNY system has something similar to what they're talking about in the article called Educational Opportunity Program. It's basically a support system for the first year of college designed to bring people up to a level where they can handle college courses. It focuses on the basics like study skills, writing and math. Unfortunately, it's targeted only to really low income students. There are plenty of people in good schools with decent financial backgrounds who skate through high school and hit a brick wall when they get to the university level.

      It would be interesting to see how much the overall pass rate improves if more "weed-out" classes weren't 400-person lectures with little opportunity to slow down and make sure everyone actually got what was going on. Freshman physics is a miserable experience if you have a shaky understanding of calculus and math, and it gets worse as you go further into it and realize things just aren't clicking.

    2. Re:College prep should be required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      freshman Engineering Calculus 1 course had an absurdly high failure rate because it was a lecture-based course, completely different from how high school classes are taught

      The main difference being that mommy and daddy make sure you actually attend your classes in high school.

  13. Good idea by siwelwerd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like a good idea to me. I work at a large flagship state school, and we see a number of underprepared students admitted. The problem is not so much that we can't teach them what they need to catch up, it's that they are given unrealistic expectations. The College of Arts and Sciences is making a big push to have everyone finish in 4 years, but this is very unrealistic for these underprepared students. A program where everyone expects them to take an extra year would reset the expectations to a realistic level and, in my opinion, probably improve performance.

    By the way, "underprepared" often includes students who have, for example, passed pre-calculus, but did not learn the material and thus struggle when I see them in calculus. It's well established that the best predictor of success in calculus is algebra/pre-calculus skills, so giving them a chance to sharpen these skills with less time pressure would be beneficial to the student.

    1. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, it sounds like a great idea. Whether they can get it to work is another matter... a STEM curriculum in college is hard for most freshman, even those who went to academically oriented high schools with good resources.

      Cue up the "Stand and Deliver" movie featuring HS calculus teacher Jaime Escalante.

    2. Re:Good idea by mjr167 · · Score: 2

      Alternately, why don't we teach the kids in high school the things they need to learn in high school so they aren't playing catch up when they go to college?

      If the skills are valuable, why do we keep pushing them further down the line? If each grade level / course is expected to impart a certain level of proficiency on the students, why do we pass them if they are not proficient? If you passed pre-calc, you should have some level of proficiency with the material. Otherwise, why did you bother? What is the point of being able to say "I passed pre-calc!" if it does not imply a baseline proficiency sufficient to move on to calculus?

    3. Re:Good idea by qvatch · · Score: 1

      it depends what you call passed. 50%, 65%, 80% (here, that's the min undergrad, honours, grad grade to "pass"). Passing means you know enough to do that material, not that you understand it well enough to apply it without effort while learning the next level, so if you stopped there you could be considered to know the material.

    4. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Honestly, that's the point of a community college... not the point of a university. If students are not prepared for the rigor of an undergraduate in engineering or science, then they should take a year or two to take basic classes at the local community college until they are ready. They should not be lowering the level of classes, or taking away time from professors to support these classes.

    5. Re:Good idea by siwelwerd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Alternately, why don't we teach the kids in high school the things they need to learn in high school so they aren't playing catch up when they go to college?

      Nobody is arguing that we shouldn't try and prepare everyone well before they get to college, but the simple fact is that we (at the universities) get these underprepared students every year, and that is unlikely to change soon. Rather than just throw blame at others and tell them to fix it, this is a proactive approach: what can *we* (at the universities) do about this problem? We'll all be ecstatic when K-12 education improves to make this a moot point, but until then we shouldn't just ignore the problem.

    6. Re:Good idea by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      However, if the universities keep lowering the bar for entry and saying "well this sucks but I guess it's what we have to work with", the high schools will keep lowering their standards. You are settling for sub-par students and hoping that the problem will fix itself magically while all the time the high schools are saying "Hey, we don't need to put all this effort into preparing kids for college because the universities will take them no matter how little they actually know."

      People are lazy. They aren't going to fix a problem because you and I sit on the internet whining about it. They are going to fix the problem when we make it hurt them. Lowing the standards and covering up for the incompetence of the K-12 system will only send the message that it is ok to not actually educate our children.

    7. Re:Good idea by siwelwerd · · Score: 2

      I tend to agree with you. But as a faculty member, I don't get any say in what goes on in K-12, or which students are admitted to college. All I get a say in is what to do with the students that do show up on campus. And this kind of program seems like something faculty members can do to better educate those students we do get.

      I do agree, we need to bring the K-12 standards up, but that's a political game that has to be solved in a way approved by the teachers' unions and the state legislatures. At least at universities, we are more (but not completely) immune to the whims of politicians.

    8. Re:Good idea by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      At least at universities, we are more (but not completely) immune to the whims of politicians.

      Why do you think you are being forced to take these less educated students? Because the parents tell their politicians that they want Johnny to go to college even if he isn't well prepared by the high schools. The Uni presidents are playing a political game trying to build larger Universities with more prestige and more taxpayer funding, and anything that reduces the number of in-state bodies they accept cuts that funding/prestige/etc. Politicians tell the parents that they are concerned about getting Johnny a good education in today's world and that they support grants and federally backed loans to help them, if only they'll vote for me! (Those other guys want to cut ...)

      Solving the problem is a political game, too. Politicians demand more property tax money to pour into the schools, pretending that more money will fix things, and when the public says "enough" and doesn't hand them more, the politicians need to make things break so the public will vote for more money next time. They can't fire bad teachers because the teacher's unions hand out money to politicians ...

      The problem is very much a political one, and universities play right along.

  14. College isn't for education. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, considering the pass rate through Freshman Calc in the Engineering/Science track was only ~60% when **I** was an undergrad in the early 1980s. . .

    Academic or not, they're Redshirts EITHER way. . . .

    You know, I wonder about that. You see it was the same when I was in college (not engineering) and it was because the department chair was busting balls - it wasn't about learning or teaching - it was busting balls for the sake of busting balls.

    The math department was run by this ass who for one, broke the calculus track into four classes instead of your usual 3: Differential, integral and then multivariate.

    I actually did better at calculus at a local engineering school! The math dept chair at my school wanted "his" students to be all ready for graduate programs in math. Yes, lots of proofs and learning the esoteric shit that only a math grad student would need.

    And then there's the chemistry 101 class - "look to your right and look to your left - those people aren't going to be here by finals." Chemistry, especially Organic, has become the weed out class for pre-med & pre-vet.t

    WTF?!?! Are we here to get an education or be weeded out?

    Weeded out.

    College is about thinning the ranks for the upper socio-economic levels - for the middle class.

    1. Re:College isn't for education. by Salgak1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, back at my old school, we had three tracks for Calc: "HMSS", aimed at the Arts-n-crafts and Business majors (literally, Humanities, Management, and Social Science): 4 semesters, nothing more that double integrals. The "Standard" track, for Engineering and Science students: 3 semesters, through triple integrals and polar coordinates, and the Braniac Track, the Standard Track in a 2-semester course. The problem, as **I** see it, is the societal urge to send everyone to college. That, at least in my opinion, is a mistake. We have a serious lack of people in the skilled trades and technician roles, and this need will grow as more mundane manufacturing and even office tasks are automated out of existence. For example: Sysadmins and Network Engineers would likely be better served by a mostly-hands on curriculum, but with other crucial skills like programming and breaking tasks down into individual actions. I speak as a guy with a Bachelor's, Masters, and about half of my Ph.D done: degrees for all too many skills are really just HR differentiators and proof you can accomplish long and complex tasks, with some direction. . .

    2. Re:College isn't for education. by fiziko · · Score: 3, Interesting

      WTF?!?! Are we here to get an education or be weeded out?

      Weeded out.

      Only in most institutions, not all. Look at the way marks are determined to find out. Marking on the curve is good for weeding students out, homogenizing professor performance, and not much else. If you find an institution that marks with criterion-referenced grading, then it's far more likely to be about education. Granted, this is a rule of thumb that only works for the top level of the food chain, and you can find exceptions to this idea very easily, but it's a start.

      --
      - W. Blaine Dowler
      http://www.bureau42.com
    3. Re:College isn't for education. by geoffball · · Score: 1

      WTF?!?! Are we here to get an education or be weeded out?

      Weeded out.

      Yes, college is so totally about smoking weed, man.

    4. Re:College isn't for education. by drainbramage · · Score: 1

      It looks like the U.S. school system isn't for education.
      Teachers in my state are refusing to use standardized testing, which their students are failing.
      Whatever means they use for grading these students I can't help but notice they generally can't do math, can't write worth a shit, and expect to get a job as a manager because they graduated with a 3.3 - 4.2 GPA.

      --
      No brain, no pain.
    5. Re:College isn't for education. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except we're automating sysadmins out of jobs too Programming resources as blocks of code is happening already. Go to any fortune 500 datacenter and you'll find code monkeys writing lifecycle management for applications in ruby. Chef, Puppet, and elastic clustering is wonderful but you can replace 3-10 infrastructure guys with a single programmer.

    6. Re:College isn't for education. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Realistically, weed out classes are a service to the student - if you can't hack a strong calc or orgo class, how are you going to handle the harder upper division courses later on? It is far better that you learn as a freshman/sophomore that you aren't going to cut it in med school/as an engineer than senior year after it is too late to change major/career track. I don't know how much orgo underlies follow on classes, but unless you have a firm grasp of calc x, you have little chance at mastering calc x+1 or linear algebra/diff eq down the line. I've failed students in Trig and Calc I that I really wanted to see succeed because at the end of the semester, they demonstrated that they had failed to master a number of core skills (product rule, chain rule, u-substitution, etc.). I teach the 'esoteric shit' like epsilon-delta limits and Riemann sums because having some degree of understanding of them is crucial to understanding how numerical techniques work down the road. Sure, when doing integrals, you are not likely to use left or right end point approximations, but if you can understand why that is a reasonable approach, more advanced techniques will make more sense. Having taught the traditional 3 class calculus sequence at an elite private and regional public school, the students at the latter could have significantly benefited from a 4 semester version with a slower pace that meant more students pass a class on the first attempt - Differential, Integral, Series, Multi-variable (or even having multi-variable before series) is better than taking differential/basic integral twice, then taking integral/series and multivariable.

    7. Re:College isn't for education. by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

      The problem, as **I** see it, is the societal urge to send everyone to college

      That's a part of it. The real issue is "free trade" sending lower level jobs overseas and automation taking care of many more. At the same time there are some nice things that only require 2 years at community college (this x-ray techs and such). So yeah, we should expand the notion of skilled trades. But for people who are just out of high school or didn't finnish, the options seem to be fast food and retail. If we got rid of so-called free trade (it's not a level playing field at all) we'd fix the economy and create jobs, but the big importers (middlemen offering little real value) will not allow it. The simple demand for those jobs would reduce the number of people thinking they need to go to college.

    8. Re:College isn't for education. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about futureproofing? That is the thing about rapidly advancing fields. You can't just assume that it is like say carpentry or welding where your practical education is good until retirement. If the practices change and all you have is practical education you're screwed. A good base of theory gives adaptability.

    9. Re:College isn't for education. by Genda · · Score: 1

      The European model of bifurcating education between college and trade seems like a very useful model for maximizing employment and having a healthy supply of skilled labor. Sadly, many companies now require a college degree for everything from janitorial work to sorting mail. It's time to set sane standards and bring back meaningful trade apprentice programs.

  15. Nothing new by jm007 · · Score: 1

    pfffttt..... Starfleet Academy has been doing this since forever.

    1. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pfffttt..... Starfleet Academy has been doing this since forever.

      If by "since forever", you mean "since 2013", yes.

      Back then they were called The University of Washington and Washington State University. They renamed to Starfleet Academy in 2065, two years after First Contact.

    2. Re:Nothing new by jm007 · · Score: 1

      well played!

  16. This may save some students from the mgmt. school by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    One of the things this might do is increase the completion rate of the engineering courses without having to dumb down instruction.

    Back when I was in college (measured in geological time units,) I started off in chemical engineering due to a fascination with engineering and a good prep in chemistry. What I didn't have was (and still is) a good math background. I know people who "get" math learn it differently from the rote memorization method taught in most schools, and this makes it make more sense. I was a memorizer -- I'd love to know the secret to actually understanding math. Anyway, it became clear to me after a year and a half that I was never going to be able to keep up with the coursework because of my lousy math background and full time employment. Most people I knew who washed out of engineering switched to business - I tried that for a semester, found it incredibly easy and boring, and switched to chemistry. So you could say I succeeded, in that I got a degree in something marketable, but I still lacked the tools to pursue what I was interested in.

    It's awful that universities have to do a "remedial year" to fix shortcomings in K-12, and I wasn't even a low income student who went to a crappy school. But looking at it from the perspective of someone who may have benefited from something like this, it makes a little sense. I think that if I hadn't had to learn calculus at the same time I was doing physics and other intro engineering courses, I may have had a better chance of actually understanding what was going on. Once you go beyond the basics and start dealing with thermodynamics, dynamics, etc., not having that foundation kills your ability to fully master the material. The problem with a program like this is that they have to find people who have skills deficiencies AND are willing to put in the hard work to correct them quickly.

  17. Well, That's Disappointing... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    A Slashdot article with the term "redshirt" in the title, and absolutely no references to Star Trek?

    Man, maybe the pessimists are right, perhaps /. really is on the decline...

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Well, That's Disappointing... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      What is this "Star Trek" thing you're talking about?

  18. Ah, redshirts by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    The away team will consist of myself, Commander Spock, Doctor McCoy, and Ensign Ricky.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Ah, redshirts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alas, poor Ricky. We hardly knew ye.

    2. Re:Ah, redshirts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shouldn't name them. It only makes it harder.

  19. Insinuation by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    I love how that they insinuate that only students from low income families come unprepared for engineering studies. Yes I realize that the odds are true that it is the case but just because you go to a well funded school doesn't mean that you have good teachers or that the student is mature enough to do well in the university setting.

    1. Re:Insinuation by pla · · Score: 1

      I love how that they insinuate that only students from low income families come unprepared for engineering studies.

      If you come from a middle (or upper) class family and plan to attend college, you take college prep courses that (at least try to) prepare you for college. Yes, you very much still have people who don't "get" math, but an extra year of paying college tuition for remedial classes won't change that fact.

      So realistically, low income people count as the only ones this sort of program would help - Non-dumb kids that just didn't have the opportunity (or luxury) to properly learn precalc in high school.

  20. In Star Trek TOS... by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 2

    Aren't the red shirts the ones who always die first?

  21. redshirt by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

    why would anyone want to be a redshirt they are always the first one to die on any away mission, and cant shoot a phaser worth crap. I'd much rather be a yellow or blue.

    --
    ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  22. Right now lots of 4 years are pushed out to 5 year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do to over full classes, the way some classes in to the year, and the high number of filler and fluff classes.

  23. Cash Grab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This sounds more like a cash grab to me. Nobody makes it through UW or WSU engineering programs in only 4 years, even under normal conditions.

  24. Re:This may save some students from the mgmt. scho by timeOday · · Score: 1

    It's awful that universities have to do a "remedial year" to fix shortcomings in K-12

    "Awful" is a strong word. In the past these students would have become blue-collar workers and never learned the material at all. Now that path is largely gone, so we're trying to help more people reach higher. (This is not just a glass-half-empty philosophical distinction; the percentage of students who enter college has gone way up in the last century including the last 20 years.)

  25. Dear Taxpayer, bend over, please by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    Thank you for your cooperation.

  26. Academic Lettering !!! now, get rid of sports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, I don't see any need for athletics in college.

    If they want to have sports levels above high-school, then they can pay the athletes and go from there.

    The current system leaves students unable to hold down any kind of job, get permanently injured so they lose their their scholarships, all while the colleges rake in funds hand over fist using their names, likenesses and abilities.

    Talk about slavery - and no, the education they are getting isn't worth the money they are losing out on by not being paid.
    Every single college athlete would shrug and say so what about losing their amateur eligibility for the Olympics if given the opportunity.

    The people that go on to the Olympics are the ones who do the work on their own, on the side, outside of school.

    College sports does nothing but ruin peoples lives, wastes time that could be used to study and learn to become a benefit to society, all while being used by the college to gain more money, that isn't used to improve education, only used to line the pockets of a few greedy bastards.

  27. Re:This may save some students from the mgmt. scho by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    You understand arithmetic?

    Math builds, identify the earliest math course you didn't understand. Study that. If you don't understand the basics all you can do is attempt to pass by memorize and regurgitate. The one you want is likely a year before the one where you started to feel like all you could do was memorize.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  28. I get it! by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 2

    So they turned a 4-year program into a 5-year program, with all 5 years at full price, I presume. If you need a year to acclimate freshmen, you either aren't doing it right, or you have the wrong students. Are the low-income target students dumber than high-income students? God help the low-income students when they leave school not only with bigger loans than their classmates, but now also an extra year's worth of debt.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    1. Re:I get it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the low-income target students dumber than high-income students?

      No, but usually they attend shittier schools and don't attend summer school/camp/etc. Missing out on a few weeks of education per year adds up to a whole year's worth of education by 12th grade. It doesn't even take much difference in school quality for 32 weeks at school A to equal 35 weeks at school B.

    2. Re:I get it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't attend summer school

      "Summer school" is what you go to to make up missed credits from the regular school year.
      It's not college prep.

  29. Ding*Ding*Ding...the AC speaks truth by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Sorry, my mod points expired yesterday, otherwise I would have used one for this AC

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  30. Washington by DarthVain · · Score: 2

    is just blatantly saying that the poor are expendable now?

  31. Obligatory Family Guy Star Trek (TOS) spoof by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1
  32. From your post; you agree ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You agree then, college is for weeded out people and not for education.

    That's all you had to say.

    The problem, as **I** see it, is the societal urge to send everyone to college. That, at least in my opinion, is a mistake. We have a serious lack of people in the skilled trades and technician roles, and this need will grow as more mundane manufacturing and even office tasks are automated out of existence.

    Thank you. Iike to see folks who agree that college is about weeded out people and not about education.

    And kudos to your English Professors, BTW. Nice ... post!

  33. Basically these are extra positions not replacing by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    They're talking about added funding from outside the UW and WSU for additional positions.

    Which, to be frank, we've heard lots of promises about added faculty and added undergrad positions, but this is the first real addition I've seen that wasn't just a promise but was funded.

    Glad they're doing it.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  34. Lest we forget by symbolset · · Score: 1

    That is to be charged an insanely high annual rate to be weeded out, leaving many with a mountain of debt and no way to pay.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  35. Fantastic Idea by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    Lots of high school students are absolutely unprepared for the rigors of college study (I was one myself) coupled with a level of independence that tests the responsibility of young people. High school is simply so dumbed down college academics can be a large jump regardless of how well you did before. I see that other posters look at it as a money grab, but so long as it doesn't become financially exploitative this will produce positive results for students from *all* spheres.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:Fantastic Idea by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      High school is simply so dumbed down college academics can be a large jump regardless of how well you did before.

      Fix the high schools. That's where the problem is.

      but so long as it doesn't become financially exploitative this will produce positive results for students from *all* spheres.

      You don't see taking money from people for a year's worth of education (at college) that they should have gotten for free (as part of high school) as being "financially exploitative?"

    2. Re:Fantastic Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who started engineering (ended up in Physics) at UW about 10 years, I think this is a great idea. Of course High School can be better, but there is little a college can do for that. Some of the engineering programs there are super competitive, and a lot of the pre-req courses are brutal. You're in Chem class with pre-Med students. You're in Physics with pre-med and pre-engineer students, and you're taking Calc with most of the same group, taught by a shitty Math department that teaches like everyone like they're going to be mathematicians.

      I think there are a lot of smart kids that don't have access (money, location) to a good, challenging school that pushes their limits and makes them work hard. As a person that had maxed out all my public HS had to offer, I still had my ass handed to me the first year. Was I smart in HS, yes. Was I lazy because it was a public HS and I didn't have to try, yes. Let those less fortunate have a bit more leeway to get up to speed, even if it is another year of tuition. I'd say the extra $12,000 in tuition is well worth it if that is the difference between an engineering degree and washing out.

    3. Re:Fantastic Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The university has 2 choices: they can provide remedial education to the underprepared, or they can continue to fail them.
      They can't do anything to fix the high schools themselves.

  36. This is not new by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    When I was at UW in the early seventies they had the same sort of "5 year bachelor's" for "disadvantaged" students who got a free ride. I'm sure some of them made out okay, but they had a reputation for smoking dope in class. You can lead a horse to water, but....

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    1. Re:This is not new by WebMasterP · · Score: 1

      My first year was 2000. I was not made aware of this program then, despite being considered a minority because I was so poor.

  37. Awesome! by WebMasterP · · Score: 1

    This is awesome. I went to the UW and I came from a very poor, under-taught school out in the sticks and from a family well below the poverty line. My intention was to be a computer science major, but I wasn't even fully prepared for pre-calc. As a result, I took a huge hit on math early on and it kind of sank my dreams. Luckily, I was able to get into another great major (Informatics) which wasn't quite as math heavy and still ended up in the profession I wanted doing quite well.

    If I had this program available to me, I would have only graduated 1 quarter later than I did and I, likely, would have gotten into the major I wanted. I ended up taking the pre-calc course over again during my 2nd year and then doing very well (4.0, 3.8) in the following two calculus classes, but only after I had acclimated to the learning environment and because there wasn't any stress on me to do well in the calculus courses. So, I had it in me, I just wasn't prepared coming in. I'll say it again, this is a great idea.

    Anyone doubting this tactic, I encourage you to realize that not all Universities are the same and the UW is a very difficult university to do well in. It's unlikely I would have had such a hard time at other less difficult schools (Washington State University, for example) where some of my friends went for a while to pad their grades to get into their major of choice at the UW.

  38. Re: weeded out people by Shag · · Score: 1

    Do you mean "college is about weeding out people?" Or are you talking about stoners? ...either way, you're probably right.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  39. Wait so that would mean by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 1

    (Sarcasm on) a university would have to give a shit about their undergrads? Why they might put you away for crazy talk like that. (Sarcasm off) Sorry I'm pretty jaded from my university which made it plainly obvious they were a research institute first and foremost.

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
  40. but we need more trades / tech school like trading by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    but we need more trades / tech school like trading the old college system moves to slow and is to long of a time to keep up with the fast moving tech field and people also need more hands on classes as well.

  41. we also need more trades / tech schools not all pe by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    we also need more trades / tech schools not all people do good in a university setting and more some stuff 4+ years pure class room is to much.

  42. Re:but we need more trades / tech school like trad by slick7 · · Score: 1

    but we need more trades / tech school like trading the old college system moves to slow and is to long of a time to keep up with the fast moving tech field and people also need more hands on classes as well.

    Trade schools are fine and all, however, engineers should also have years of practical experience before getting their degrees, just like medical doctors. Book learning is just that, learning from books. Being a field engineer means being in the field where there are differences between what the book shows you and what the data from the field shows you. Just because you are working with a 4 to 20 milliamp feedback circuit doesn't mean you can achieve 4 to 20 milliamps ( this is an ideal) my experience has shown me it's more like 7 to 18.5 milliamps. Your values may vary according to circuit workmanship, humidity, environment, whether the people around you give a shit or not.

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  43. Red Shirts...disposables needed to fill a role? by lpq · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else think of Star Trek's Red Shirts -- and how they were used to provide body count? Maybe the research universities needs so many warm bodies to get in for less than altruistic reasons??