Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft May Acquire Nook Tablet Business From Barnes and Noble

whoever57 writes "According to a report in Techcrunch, Microsoft is considering buying out the remaining shares in Nook Media. Microsoft already owns 17% of Nook Media. Documents reveal that Nook Media plans to discontinue selling tablets and transition to a model under which media is distributed through partners." (Also at SlashCloud.)

157 comments

  1. Next Up by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, the Nook is history, and we will see a crippled Sidewalk or Ceiling Tile or Man Hole or whatever that Microsoft thing is? Oh yes... The Surface.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Next Up by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Vocational collage

      collage?

    2. Re:Next Up by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Funny

      Vocational collage

      collage?

      Yes. Simular to Basket Weaving 101.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:Next Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone who makes collages for a living?

    4. Re:Next Up by tripleevenfall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We have two companies admitting failure here, B&N and MSFT.

      It's too bad about the Nook, they are nice devices. Nook should have won over Kindle, but B&N didnt have the foresight years ago to get into the everything business the way Amazon did, so they were always going to be muscled out of the market.

      Microsoft on the other hand will probably just try to make money off Nook's patent portfolio, given they have failed with their "Surface" (which, near as I can tell, is some kind of break-dancing tutor device.)

    5. Re:Next Up by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know why you got modded down since buying companies and tech and shitting all over them and making them worthless? Been their MO for several years now. Zune, Kin, Sidekick, killing the profitable playsforsure for the DOA Zune market, if its one thing MSFT is good at its taking a lesser player on the field and totally ruining it. I'm shocked that Amazon's stock didn't go up more at the announcement as nook has been the only competition they've had in eReaders and MSFT will kill them dead, most likely by getting rid of the cheap hardware and going "herps derp, they'll buy a $1000 MSFT Surface cuz of the Nook, we're special! herpa de derpa". because MSFT is gonna sell at Apple prices or die dammit!...of course it looks like the "or die dammit!" is what is gonna happen in reality.

      Poor MSFT shareholders, it must be frustrating as hell to watch the company be run off the rails by an incompetent CEO that has the biggest shareholder as his BFF so no matter how he shits on the company he can't be fired. I've seen many saying that "when things get bad enough Bill will come back!"...no he won't, Jobs had his massive ego tied into his company, Bill has cashed out enough stock he could live like a God if MSFT burned to the ground. More likely he'll quietly cash out and walk away,he doesn't care about his old company anymore, its nothing like Jobs and Apple.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    6. Re:Next Up by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So Nook was a failure for B&N? Sure, maybe it's not giving Amazon as much of a run for its money as B&N hoped. But then again, just what does B&N think it's going to do if it gives up on Nook now? Sell magazines and coffee? Good luck on that >cough< Borders >cough<.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    7. Re:Next Up by erroneus · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Our pop, impatient "gotta have it now" while at the same time "I'll wait for the movie because reading is too time consuming" mentality is destroying not just our own brain cells, but reducung the capacity and potention of our children.

      I'm too tired to think about this, but I'm pretty sure it's tragic.

    8. Re:Next Up by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Microsoft on the other hand will probably just try to make money off Nook's patent portfolio

      B&N were one of the few companies that didn't cave in to Microsoft's FATx extortion racket. That won't be happening again.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    9. Re:Next Up by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nook had a lot of advantages too. Epub format so you could get books from other vendors (not sure how hard that was) and back them up somewhere for safety, whereas kindle prefers a proprietary format. Nook had a lot of features before Kindle too, like pdf and book lending. Amazon has taken the step of recalling books with DRM, which I haven't heard about B&N doing yet.

      And face it, Amazon is a far bigger faceless entity than B&N. If you like real book stores then B&N wins.

    10. Re:Next Up by Cinder6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree that it'll be a loss for consumers if the Nook disappears. However...

      I've owned (or currently own) three Kindles, one Nook (the glow light version), and the new Kobo that got slashvertised here a few weeks ago. As I've posted before, Amazon simply has the best platform of the three (I haven't tried others). It's ridiculously easy to sideload books wirelessly, without jailbreaking, to all of your Kindles at once. More importantly, Kindle will sync the location of sideloaded books. Third-party publishers, such as Baen, already offer MOBI files, so you don't even need to use Calibre.

      The only other eBook vendor I know of that syncs sideloaded stuff is Apple, and they don't have a dedicated eReader, and sideloading is a little bit trickier than the Kindle. I haven't checked out Google; how are they in this arena?

      I've also found Amazon to be the cheapest, at least for books I actually want to read. Two books on my shortlist, A Fire Upon the Deep and The Last Colony, are both $2 more on the Kobo store. A couple dollars here and there add up. (My solution right now is to buy on Amazon and convert it for the Kobo.)

      What makes it all so frustrating is that Amazon has the worst hardware of the three. It isn't that it's bad, it's that it's very utilitarian. The Nook has the best-feeling reader, while the Kobo has the best software (their text options are downright great), screen, and backlight.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    11. Re:Next Up by emaname · · Score: 2

      ...given they have failed with their "Surface" (which, near as I can tell, is some kind of break-dancing tutor device.)

      Oh man, tripleevenfall, do I wish I had mod points for you. Clearly that's the impression from their goofy commercial. I just can't understand what the hipster is doing in there.

      --
      An effective "democracy" creates the illusion the people have a say in their government.
    12. Re:Next Up by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      We have two companies admitting failure here, B&N and MSFT.

      Microsoft isn't admitting failure, it's a brilliant strategy. What they're no doubt planning to do is port Windows Nothing (formerly Windows RT, renamed due to its 0.00% market share), to the Nook. Anything divided by nothing is infinity, so Microsoft will gain infinite market share through this move. Sheer brilliance.

    13. Re:Next Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the real failure for B&N was the international market. Kindle is open - you can buy amazon books into it anywhere in the world. B&N crippled themselves, for no apparent gain whatsoever - you can only buy nook books from within a nook device, if you are a resident of the usa, with a US IP, or inside a B&N store (which are located only in the US).

    14. Re:Next Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree. Send to Kindle is a stroke of genius, and it adds to the strength of the Kindle ecosystem. As an ereader system, the Kindle beats the competition easily. The hardware is actually ok, and the Kindle Paperwhite is ahead in a few ways, too.

      Where the Kindle lacks is in flexibility. Apps are pathetic and only available in the US. The software seems a bit clunky at times, and it is missing quite a few things that would be nice to have. And yes, formatting options could be better.

    15. Re:Next Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its hairyfeet the MS shill again... omgz.. he is just trying to defend MS all the time.. omgawddddd guyzzz look look... *drool*...

      - Alex Belits

    16. Re:Next Up by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

      The Kindle had (shitty) pdf support the same month as the Nook launched, though I'm sure the Nook competition is what pushed Amazon to add it.

      DRM is not really an issue with a Kindle (or a Nook) because with Calibre you can automatically strip DRM from files and convert from any format to any format.
      It is trivial to buy from non-DRM sources and read those books on a Nook or Kindle.

      Amazon once removed copies of books that it sold that it didn't have the right to sell and promptly said they wouldn't ever do it again.
      They also once canceled a woman's account (which may have wiped her device) due the kindle being resold or something. I don't really remember. I just remember that people made enough of a stink that they gave her back her account.

      What really bothers me about Amazon is that their Kindles phone home with data about the books you read/location data/etc. Well, unless you keep your antenna off or manually kill that process.

      And B&N helped kill all of my local bookstores before Amazon was even a thing. As long as authors get paid to keep writing books I don't even care anymore.

    17. Re:Next Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the Nook is history, and we will see a crippled Sidewalk or Ceiling Tile or Man Hole or whatever that Microsoft thing is? Oh yes... The Surface.

      So we get a year of Android and then new Nooks are converted to WP8, then the Nook dies.

    18. Re:Next Up by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      As I've posted before, Amazon simply has the best platform of the three (I haven't tried others). It's ridiculously easy to sideload books wirelessly, without jailbreaking, to all of your Kindles at once.

      I have a nook simple touch. It is rooted. I have installed the Amazon app. I have a file manager with SMB support, which can reach my fileserver. I can run samba on the device, and copy files to it directly. Out of the box, not so amazing. Rooted, pretty fantastic. Did I mention it's overclocked to 1 GHz and has a toggle-able fast rendering mode?

      What makes it all so frustrating is that Amazon has the worst hardware of the three. It isn't that it's bad, it's that it's very utilitarian. The Nook has the best-feeling reader, while the Kobo has the best software (their text options are downright great), screen, and backlight.

      The Nook is the best-feeling reader, and I can read just fine. I do wish I had the one with the glowlight, so I could use it in the dark. I got it used-like-new with a charger for $70 locally, so it was a good deal, and don't regret the purchase. If it weren't for the lack of RAM it would be a truly amazing device, and GB probably would have been ported to it. But even a heavily stripped CM7 port would have about 50MB free... There's just no point to that.

      I get why you'd buy the Kobo, I only don't get why someone nerdly would buy a Kindle.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Next Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a relatively new Nook owner, and also a person who has a rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth hatred of Microsoft, let me join the chorus of those screaming: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

      I bought my Nook Simple Touch and thought it was a neat compromise between a real, physical book and a computer-based device and have even used it for reading, (something I haven't done as much of in recent years as in the past). I enjoyed being able to tote a small library with me without having to tote a small library with me, everywhere I go... I even bought several books (not counting those I downloaded for free because their copyrights had expired,) some of which I'll read eventually. But if Microsoft is going to get money from my future book purchases, now that I know about this, I've most likely already purchased my last Nook-book. I may even root the bitch so I can use it as a mini-tablet, if someone's figured out how to do that. I guess that'll be my next stop on the Info-way today when I finish typing this.

      In all, I think I've actually paid for about a half-dozen e-books on this thing, and since they cost almost as much as real books, and way more than most books cost at my local Half-Price... maybe I'll go back to 'dead-tree' books. After all, at least those goddamned motherfucking motherfuckers at Microsoft won't get a cut.

      This news couldn't be less welcome if Apple were also getting a piece of the action. M$ already owns 17%?!? Fuck... no more Nook books for me then. Goddamned shiteating sonsofbitches...

    20. Re:Next Up by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      I thought it was even funnier when they were advertising some sort of futuristic break-dancing work environment that had a Netflix app prominently displayed on their alleged work tablets.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    21. Re:Next Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B&N could have gotten around the fact that they could not distribute everything like Amazon if they would have included Google Play from the beginning. I have two Nooks and I broke down and bought Kindles because I could get the media I wanted. I could have gotten the same media through Google if it was an option and would have stuck with the Nooks.

    22. Re:Next Up by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      I'm shocked that Amazon's stock didn't go up more at the announcement as nook has been the only competition they've had in eReaders [...]

      Well, except for that iPad thingy out there, which incidentally gets used as an e-Reader on occasion. May explain why Amazon didn't get much stockholder love. Mind you, when you also consider that Amazon itself has been recently positioning the Kindle brand against the iPad, I can see why no one is under the impression that Amazon/Kindle is the 'last man standing' in the market.

      Other than that bit? Hell yes I agree with your post otherwise.

      I always found it fascinating to see MSFT buy something, only to run it into the dirt, and you haven't even touched the enterprise space (...anyone else on /. know what DynamicsNAV used to be before MSFT bought it, fucked it all up, and then left it to rot?) If it weren't for the lingering inertia from the WinTel juggernaut, they'd have gone the way of Wang and DEC by now. OTOH, seeing my wife's reaction last night to Windows 8?** I'm kind of wondering why MSFT is even starting to screw up their cash cows now...

      Jobs had his massive ego tied into his company, Bill has cashed out enough stock he could live like a God if MSFT burned to the ground. More likely he'll quietly cash out and walk away,he doesn't care about his old company anymore, its nothing like Jobs and Apple.

      Jobs cared for two reasons: First, Apple was his baby (at least in his eyes). Second, he actually did have a good (initial) vision of making computers human-friendly, and knew how to make engineers (mostly) see things the same way.

      Bill? I think you're close, but for a different reason: For Bill, it was/is all about winning, reputation, and money. His passion (and likely ability) for coding and engineering died sometime back in the mid 1990's.

      --

      ** About that Win 8 thingy? The missus needed a new laptop, as the old one drowned in chocolate-flavored coffee. She tries Windows 8 at a Best Buy store, got frustrated, decided she hated it, wants Windows 7. The sales critters all said nobody sells Windows 7 boxen - I tried to correct the record, but I knew it was too late - she's now pissed. She says "let's go", as she walks briskly out of the store. Out of curiousity, I follow her to the Apple Store, and watched her buy a top-end iPad and a bluetooth keyboard for her (completely casual) online needs.

      She's still gushing about the thing, though TBH for her online/computer needs it fills the bill perfectly. BTW - yes, I tried to tell her about Newegg and suchlike having Win7 laptops... she wasn't having any of it. Anyrate, I usually use her as a means of gauging typical user/use-case scenarios, as she is decidedly non-geek, and she's not the first non-geek that I've seen (or have told me they did) do this.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    23. Re:Next Up by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      Bill has cashed out enough stock he could live like a God if MSFT burned to the ground. More likely he'll quietly cash out and walk away,he doesn't care about his old company anymore, its nothing like Jobs and Apple.

      The thing to remember about these crazed sociopaths is that they NEVER have enough money, prestige, power. Bill is just channelling his ego in a different direction now. He's trying to get his own legacy, the guy who cured malaria, to one-up Jobs. Who knows what he'll decide tomorrow. Maybe we need criminal profilers to figure these guys out.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    24. Re:Next Up by wallsg · · Score: 1

      And B&N helped kill all of my local bookstores before Amazon was even a thing. As long as authors get paid to keep writing books I don't even care anymore.

      I'm confused. I thought that was Fox Books...

    25. Re:Next Up by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      But then again, just what does B&N think it's going to do if it gives up on Nook now?

      Judging from the last time I was in a B&N (a few weeks ago), I'd say the answer is "become a high-class, more limited Target". They've had a DVD/CD section for some time now, and in the past few years they've started carrying toys, focusing mostly on exploratory, educational, or similar ones like various planetarium-style items and LEGO. I think they started doing stuffed animals recently.

      I don't know how well this is serving them, but it seems that only half of a normal B&N is actually for reading materials now.

    26. Re:Next Up by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Amazon recalled the e-books, which they could not have done with physical books. If they had made that mistake with real books they'd have been forced to eat the costs, thus paying for their own mistakes. With e-books they just flip a switch and problem solved, except for angry customers.

    27. Re:Next Up by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      The only shill here is you Alex. How much is RMS paying you again? Did he let you share some of his toe jam? Because nobody that isn't being paid can be so God damned retarded that he honestly thinks saying a company has run off the rails is saying something fucking positive about the company.

      Steve Ballmer must thank God every day for fart sniffing retards like you "championing" Linux, it does as much good to have batshit morons like you praising it as to have Skids and Mudflap champion Black History month. No go compile something bitch, don't make me throw up the looong list of Linsux fails to make your girly ass cry again.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    28. Re:Next Up by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It seems like Bill has his hands full with his foundation and trying to make a name for himself with it (which is fine, really; curing malaria and other diseases is something really beneficial to humanity, unlike trying to make MS relevant again). I seriously doubt he's going to jump back to trying to save MS.

  2. The Age Old Story by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you can't grow a market, just buy one.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:The Age Old Story by symbolset · · Score: 4, Funny

      And then burn it to the ground.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:The Age Old Story by sehlat · · Score: 1

      And after starting the fire attempt to micturate on it to put it out.

    3. Re:The Age Old Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But the fourth one stayed up! And that's what you're going to get, lad, the shittiest tablet in all of England.

    4. Re:The Age Old Story by DogDude · · Score: 1

      If you can't grow a market, just buy one.

      That's right. That's business. Sometimes that's the best business decision. It doesn't seem to bother you, since you're posting on a site owned by Dice.com that bought their way into the geek market, right?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    5. Re:The Age Old Story by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 2

      But the fourth one stayed up! And that's what you're going to get, lad, the shittiest tablet in all of England.

      Where's my Mod Funny points when I need then?

      --
      They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
    6. Re:The Age Old Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burning digital bits? Sounds like a fire sale!

    7. Re:The Age Old Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm fine with that. I wasn't going to buy a Nook anyway.

    8. Re:The Age Old Story by symbolset · · Score: 1

      It's plutopyrophilia is what it is. Classic case of a fetish for burning wealth.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    9. Re:The Age Old Story by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      God isn't that the truth and the royal bitch is the entire thing comes down to MSFT having no idea what their own strengths are so that aping Apple is hamstringing the entire company.

      Look at playsforsure, which to me is a perfect example of MSFT taking a growing market and burning it to the ground trying to be Apple, right before the Zune came out the playsforsure market was growing like mad, you could buy playsforsure devices at every price point, from the $20 gumstix MP3 players at the checkout counter to $300 PMPs, and because there was a rich ecosystem both on the hardware and the software side it was growing thanks to good old competition and with every sale MSFT was getting a cut....what happened? Most likely Ballmer or one of his PHBs said "Its not like Apple, they get a BIG cut and we only get a small one because we aren't in control, we need to fix this!" and promptly destroyed the whole fucking thing.

      This is gonna piss off the FOSS advocates when i point this out but what has always sold MSFT tech is how OPEN it was, how you quickly got competition and economies of scale so you have every price point and possible consumer covered. Anybody could write Windows software, any website could sell Windows software, you had all this competition which compared to the locked down centralized control of Apple was appealing, but now Ballmer is shitting all over that because HE wants to be Apple, HE wants a "Microsoft ecosystem" where he gets a 30% cut of everything, and its fucking slaughtering the company because its throwing out everything that MSFT was strong at, plenty of competition and open systems, and leaning on everything they sucked at, making "ecosystems" and tying everything together.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    10. Re:The Age Old Story by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      I think you missed the point which is that as a business strategy that can work IF you understand the market you are buying into, but with Zune, Sin, Sidekick, Zune market, and WinRT I don't think its a stretch to say MSFT doesn't have a damned clue about consumer media so they will just burn it like they burned so many others.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    11. Re:The Age Old Story by PCM2 · · Score: 2

      That's right. That's business. Sometimes that's the best business decision.

      I think what the GP was implying is that Microsoft had no chance of growing a market in e-books, couldn't grow one if it tried, and that once it owns Nook it will still be completely incapable of growing the market it just bought -- in fact it will shrink. Sometimes the best business decision is to stay out of markets where your company has no competency.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    12. Re:The Age Old Story by chowdahhead · · Score: 1

      There's really no reason to buy a Nook now that there are better tablets at the same pricepoint and comparable ones for less. A lot has changed in two year's time.

    13. Re: The Age Old Story by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      The main difference is that MS was chasing the wrong revenue stream. Apple sells music because it sells players. Apple doesn't really care that you are tied to their music store. MS pissed off many of their partners by making a player that only worked with their store. Years later the Zune sold some units but was it worth it to alienate all their partners.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    14. Re:The Age Old Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't maintain a monopoly...

      *fixed it.

    15. Re:The Age Old Story by SEE · · Score: 2

      Oh, yeah.

      I mean, imagine if the Zune, instead of being an effort at an Apple-type ecosystem, had been an effort at a platform attack on Apple?

      Imagine a Zune that supported PlaysForSureâ"and every other format Microsoft could manage to add. Even open-source formats like Ogg Vorbis.

      That had a fully-documented, royalty-free accessories port, for both the hardware and software, and a sufficiently-documented sync protocol to allow third-party media players (even for *nix) to work with the device.

      That launched in a massive cross-promotion with Walmart, which at the time was running its own PlaysForSure market. Which involved Microsoft and Walmart handing the Beatles enough money to get them to release their music on Walmart's market, but not iTunes.

      That supported end-user replacement of old batteries, complete with such replacements being carried by (of course) Walmart.

      In short, a device not designed to mimic Apple, but to aim at every single weak spot the iPod had, in an effort to create a replacement ecosystem of music devices where Microsoft would collect small royalties on device firmware and PlaysForSure music sales.

      That could have actually worked.

      It would have screwed the rest of us, at least for a while, because with PlaysForSure live the record companies would have at least delayed cutting the deals that let Walmart and the like sell non-DRM MP3s. But Microsoft would have been in a much better position as a result.

    16. Re:The Age Old Story by readingaccount · · Score: 1

      Microsoft will learn. They have enough money to "fail" every so often, and eventually they keep bouncing back by delivering a gem after fucking up. But right now they seem to want to take the strategies that other companies like Apple are using, and give them a bit of a Microsoft twist but in the wrong direction. So you end up with advertisements for Surface with poppy music, quick edits and people dancing and jumping, as if that's how anyone uses computers. It only works for Apple because they're considered much more cool compared to Microsoft, so when MS tries it, it just comes off as hamfisted and try-hard. Like an old man trying to sprout words he's heard from young folks.

    17. Re:The Age Old Story by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Can't imagine it, can't even imagine a Zune that works every day on a leap year (remember that idiotic design failure). Face it, they rolled out team Z and not team A for that one and wouldn't have gone for anything other than a conservative low budget copy of somebody else's stuff.

    18. Re:The Age Old Story by ignavus · · Score: 1

      If you can't grow a market, just buy one.

      Trouble is, buying a declining market isn't going to help you if you cannot grow your own.

      You are just left with two losing products instead of one.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    19. Re:The Age Old Story by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the best business decision is to stay out of markets where your company has no competency.

      Anybody remember when Microsoft was thinking about buying Intuit? Microsoft Money (heh) wasn't quite as nice as Quicken and they really wanted to get into the accounting software market big. Everyone balked, some screamed anti-trust. In the end MS threw in the towel and Intuit is doing well. Imagine if they had bought Quicken only to kill it later because of their incompetency.

    20. Re:The Age Old Story by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      But the fourth one stayed up! And that's what you're going to get, lad, the shittiest tablet in all of England.

      But mothe—er, Father, I don't any of that.... I don't want to get married to a Micro-softie. I'd rather... I'd rather just Upgrade my Jelly Bean.

    21. Re:The Age Old Story by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      The sad part is right before Zune came out...that is EXACTLY what you had. you have not one company controlling the entire thing like Apple whom as another pointed out was only really interested in selling their overpriced PMPs. No you had over a dozen websites, all facing good old free market competition for every user so they were fighting like tigers with better prices, cheaper sales, right before Zune announced no PFS support which destroyed the market i remember IIRC Napster was offering "all you can eat" for just $10 a month and gave you 10 MP3s a month to boot! I mean can you imagine instead of a buck a song whole catalogs for $10 a month? And fan generated playlists and the ability to share your own on multiple sites so you could buld communities around the fans?

      And on the hardware side is was just as wonderful and varied, you had the little MP3 players like my Sandisk M260 (which I love and still have, built like a tank, takes a single AAA so if it goes dead while I'm out 5 minutes in any store and I'm back up, and 4GB is more than I'm gonna have time to listen to when I'm out and about) to the little 4 inch screen PMPs in the $75 range all the way up to the huge storage big screens by Cowon and a dozen other companies. And it didn't matter if you had a $300 iRiver and I had my $50 Sandisk as we could still share playlists and check out each others favorite tunes, just plug it into any USB port and push a button and there ya go.

      But I think if you look at MSFT's history two things become clear. 1.-Every major success was preceded by "and then the competition did something REALLY stupid" and 2.-That if the competition doesn't make an obviously boneheaded move that just basically gives MSFT a free shot then MSFT will happily shoot themselves in the foot and destroy all their efforts because they just can't be happy with SOME of the market, they HAVE to have the vast majority or nothing.

      Sadly PFS fits those rules perfectly because while PFS was growing at a decent clip Apple wasn't just gonna torpedo their own company with a really dumb move so MSFT killed any chance they had because SOME growth and SOME gains are never enough, they want all or nothing, its what I call the "iMoney or nothing" fallacy where a company will destroy something trying to make a supermega hit yesterday instead of just letting it grow naturally or taking second place.

      So while I agree with you 100% that your strategy would have worked and given MSFT a good chunk of the market they wouldn't have been making iMoney on each and every MP3 player sale and they just couldn't stand not making iMoney so they just HAD to trash it, in the end the greed for having it all was too much.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    22. Re:The Age Old Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's really no reason to buy a Nook now that there are better tablets at the same pricepoint and comparable ones for less. A lot has changed in two year's time.

      Exactly. Having bought a Kindle and then a Nexus 7, I realize that the Kindle app did everything I needed it to. Why would I buy a specialized book reader that has been morphed into a marginal tablet? If B&N pull this off, their officers deserve big bonuses. MS will have bought a DOA tablet and they'll probably try to force WP8 into.

    23. Re:The Age Old Story by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      FYI, that was only one version of the device. The second-gen models were able to handle leap days fine. The first-gen failed at that because their clock code was developed by Toshiba, who also manufactured the hardware, and apparently Toshiba can't code their way out of a wet paper bag.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    24. Re:The Age Old Story by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      But doesn't that just illustrate his and my points, that you had hamfisted marketing driven crap instead of actual thought going into making products people would want to own? I mean you have a device that is gonna be your flagship...and you don't even do a code audit to make sure there isn't show stopping bugs on it? Really?

      To me it just shows what I've been saying for years, MSFT under Ballmer is being run by the marketing dept, not engineering like under Gates, and the lack of quality shows. Hell if the rumors are true the only reason Win 7 got to be good was Ballmer was too busy squirting with his Zune to care so he left Sinofsky alone and let him do what he wanted. I used to blame Sinofsky for Win 8 but as time goes on its coming out more and more that he got overruled by Ballmer and the drones and basically was told to sign his name on a product he didn't want and that tension is eventually what drove the guy out, he wanted to make a better Win 7 and Ballmer wanted iOS and look at what we got, yet another marketing driven trainwreck.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    25. Re:The Age Old Story by dbIII · · Score: 1

      MSFT under Ballmer is being run by the marketing dept, not engineering like under Gates, and the lack of quality shows

      Even just getting a Win7 OEM disk shows that. The fucking thing is in the case upside down so you can see that label through the plastic and to look nice for marketing purposes. Functionally that is utterly stupid since you have to be careful not to get fingerprints all over the thing getting it out of the case, and I most definitely have had read errors due to fingerprints on CDROMs in the past. That's just another of the long list of symptoms.

    26. Re:The Age Old Story by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Hell spend a few months in windows 8 to see what marketing gone amok is REALLY like friend!

      You have this fugly garish primary color mess, probably because somebody told them "that will draw eyes to your marketing" which is ALL the "Start screen" (fuck you MSFT, its a task panel. Can I start anything I need from the start screen? No? then its a fucking task panel) is in a nutshell, its MARKETING. Its MSFT "apps" that give you MSFT ads and is designed to try to ram the "MSFT Ecosystem" down your damned throat, even the most basic of functionality like mail and media player has been dumbed down and designed to try to drive you to buy from the MSFT "appstore" which BTW, are you fucking SICK of the word "apps" yet? I've gotten to the point that when i hear "app" I just want to bitchslap the living fuck out of them and say "Its a fucking PROGRAM you hipster douchebag!"

      But anybody that doesn't believe that the engineers were run off by marketing monkeys at MSFT only has to spend a few days in Win 8 to be cockslapped with so damned much buzzword bingo it'll make you wanna fucking puke. I mean how God damned pathetic do you have to be to let the marketing drone build fricking ADS into your flagship product you expect people to pay money for? The entire company has gone off the rails IMHO and as long as the marketing drones are running the show every product is gonna be made of suck and fail.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  3. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't they the (pretty much only) Android vendor to refuse to pay up to Microsoft's patent racket? And it says Microsoft owns 17% of them - is that right?

    1. Re:WTF? by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Microsoft bought Nook up when Barns & Noble stood up to them saying take it to court of bugger off. So rather then risk loosing in court and in turn having all of the android device manufacturers turning on them, they tried to save face and "partnered" with Barns and Noble, who being primarily book sellers not tech people weren't familiar with the Microsoft motto "embrace extend extinguish".

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    2. Re:WTF? by alexander_686 · · Score: 2

      That’s only half right - Barns and Noble has been having issues with year – thanks to Amazon. When the initial purchase was made I did not hear a peep about the lawsuit from anybody – It was B&N was getting out of clicks to focus on bricks.

    3. Re:WTF? by paiute · · Score: 1

      It was B&N was getting out of clicks to focus on bricks.

      The B&N CEO must have just read The Road Ahead.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    4. Re:WTF? by Perp+Atuitie · · Score: 2

      Yup. Same ol' sleazy "business model" they've used from the very beginning. And they say China has no tech imagination. Anyway, so long, Nook, it's been good to know you. Probly won't like you anymore once the price goes up 300 or 400 percent and you get an ugly new MS scare-mask face.

    5. Re:WTF? by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      The main problem B&N has is the lack of truly open tablets. When I want to read one of my Nook books, I read it on my Kindle using the Nook app (or on my old E-ink Nook if it's a novel and not a technical manual).

      So, given that, why were they in the tablet business? Because if they relied on other tablets to carry their application, they risked being muscled completely out of the market.Now the Nook app was trivial to install on my Kindle, but I expect that Amazon could break it in their gimped implementation/fork of Android if they wanted.

      (Incidentally, before anyone thinks, "well you are the sucker who bought a gimped Android Kindle," I haven't bought either a Nook or a Kindle, they were both gifts. I did buy a Blackberry Playbook, so who be smart now? Yaaarr....)

      i'm trying to figure out who "walled garden" is good for other than the first movers who get a demi-monopoly and the top also ran who gets to live on the edge of the cliff unless they take the throne. (See: The History of Video Games NES to Present.)

      To me it's idiotic that Microsoft, who built their business on "we don't care who makes software as long as it's for our platform, though someday we may steal your idea and give it away for free with the OS," trying to be the 4th place Also-ran walled garden. but I'm just a simple country programmer... I still think there's money to be made by someone saying "screw the walled garden, we'll make it up in marketshare."

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  4. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0

    If they buy it, i'm dumping my simple touch ( which i do love ). Screw them, and the horse they rode in on.

    That's just silly.

    Microsoft has owned a significant (but not majority) steak in Nook for some time, certainly when you purchased your unit. And, what does Nook's future direction (into the toilet) have to do with its past when you purchased your unit from Nook who at that time already had a significant Microsoft ownership?

    Oh, that's right, fan boys and common sense don't mix...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  5. Our story so far... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Well, it's an improvement. They stopped innovating and went to almost 10 years of mee-too-itis, not learning from IBM and OS 2, and it caught up to them. So buy an innovation that isn't mee too.

    Buying other peoples' successful stuff has its own issues.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  6. you're assuming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That the Nook had a market to burn. The hardware-for-price was a winner for the form factor but ultimately B&Ns walled garden app store proved once again that what people really want is selection.

    I own 3 nooks, but they're all running CM 10.1. Stock ROM is very limited.

    1. Re:you're assuming... by Perp+Atuitie · · Score: 1

      As I recall, B&N just opened the Nook to the whole Android store, so that issue appears over.

    2. Re:you're assuming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real issue is that they took apple's "one home button" design route, so the vast majority of the android apps that expect you to have a back button are unusable.

    3. Re:you're assuming... by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      In my experience, the Nook has a similar selection to Amazon, except perhaps for indie authors. I think the problem here is mindshare. Amazon was first, everyone and their mom shops at Amazon, and they've had the Kindle plastered on the front page for years.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    4. Re:you're assuming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the books I buy are available either for the Kindle or in EPUB. However, the EPUB titles usually are two to three times more expensive and require that I have Adobe Digital Edition on my computer to download them. I have found Adobe Digital Edition a bit of trouble when I need to reset the number I have because of reloading my operating system whereas with the Kindle, all I have to do is go to my library and delete a no longer needed Kindle for Computer program.

    5. Re:you're assuming... by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Eh, I can load up any amount of books via USB, I'm not constricted at all. Also I don't care about the ROM, apps, or versatility, it does one job and it does it very well, and that's all I will ever want from it.

    6. Re:you're assuming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They only opened the latest two Nooks to Google Play. B&N had a good tablet, but they killed themselves by not allowing people to use the Nook except through B&N. I wouldn't be surprised to see consumer lawsuits for false advertising in either New York or California soon. MS had better be careful that they do not wind up paying for B&N's shady dealing.

    7. Re:you're assuming... by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Kindle seems to have the best prices. Though I do buy Adobe-"protected" books, I always load them into Calibre and strip the DRM. I'm not sure what sites you buy from, though; I haven't had to install Adobe Digital Edition...yet.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
  7. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by Lynchenstein · · Score: 1

    Right. Don't get in the way of, or call him out on, his irrationality.

  8. Video game consoles, for counterexample by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If "what people really want is selection", then why do people buy video game consoles instead of PCs? PCs have a far larger selection of video games and other applications than consoles due to the far lower overhead and the far less strict developer qualifications. Why would people want selection on a tablet but not on a TV?

    1. Re:Video game consoles, for counterexample by alexander_686 · · Score: 2

      Ease of use (I have never owned a console, but I know how to set the jumpers on my SoundBlaster to get sound.). It is the difference between a Swiss army knife and a screwdriver. One does everything, the other does 1 thing well.

      As for the Nook – why not an Amazon Kindle (arguably a better selection) or a full fledge table (better everything, but higher cost)? It just did not land in that sweet spot of cost / performance / selection / ease of use.

    2. Re:Video game consoles, for counterexample by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > Why do people buy video game consoles instead of PCs

      Simple: Ease of use. You don't have to fart around with updating drivers, keeping all the software up-to-date, worry about viruses, performance tweaking, etc.

      Remember computing generally falls into 2 camps:
          Simplicity < - - - and - - - > Flexibility

      Most costumers don't give a crap about flexibility - they just want something works and is easy to use, ala iOS. Which is a segue to my next point; Tech companies forget the biggest barrier to customers:

            Out-of-box experience

      Consoles _used_ to provide a Plug-n-Play experience, as in, just plug it in, and start playing. Once they started shipping with hard drives & broadband access the OEMs and Game Devs have gotten extremely sloppy with their mentality --- i.e. "We can always patch later on day 0."

      PC's smoke consoles from a performance and flexibility use but consoles for the most part are just dumb gaming devices that almost anyone can just use; ala the success of the Wii with the older crowd.

    3. Re:Video game consoles, for counterexample by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I buy video game consoles because the games I want to play are released only for consoles. The same goes for pretty much any other platform: people don't care about theoretical selection and amount of content, they care whether the device they are considering buying supports the specific content they intend to buy.

    4. Re:Video game consoles, for counterexample by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      People don't buy consoles for other applications, they buy them for games. To give you an idea of the problem with PCs (and understand, I'm perfectly ok with tossing all the consoles into the Crack of Doom and just having non-gimped PC hardware, in fact that sounds like a perfect world) I'll just talk about my joystick experience.

      I have a lot of extra Wii classic controllers. I keep getting them as gifts, I've got like half a dozen of them. Seriously.

      So, the crummy, used, knock-off XBox 360 controller clone I was using with my console-style PC games went to controller Hell, so I thought, "I'll buy an adaptor for my extra Wii controllers, and use them." and I did buy the adaptor.... and what did my console style Pc games say?

      "Nah-ah! We only work with Monopoly brand controllers! Take your non-Microsoft controllers elsewhere, peasant!"

      Now, I hunted around and found some hackware that said, "Use our clunky hack-ware into tricking your Pc into thinking that your non Xbox 360 controller is an xbox 360 controller."

      Now, obviously, it's stupid to complain about this, because if I had an Xbox console, I wouldn't be given the option to use a Wii controller on it.

      But I wasn't using a console, I was using a PC. It wasn't just adapted Wii controllers either, I checked, it was anything that you couldn't also plug into an Xbox and expect to work.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    5. Re:Video game consoles, for counterexample by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Because they think its like the old days and don't know how cheap and easy it is now to get an HTPC? You'd be surprised how many people when i show them that dirt cheap Athlon Triple or Quad and how easy it is to hook up think "Won't that be expensive? and won't I have to buy constant upgrades?" which back in the day was true, but since they switched from MHz wars to core wars is no longer the case. I can build them a damned nice gaming PC for less than $500 and make a decent profit and it'll game for years, its just most folks don't know that.

      But I think Valve is gonna change all that, from what I've read they are gonna do a "plays for sure" with the Steambox where if a system meets the minimum specs it can load SteamOS and run as a console or even dual boot so lots of system builders like me will be selling Steamboxes and once folks see that its easy and cheap? they'll be happy to buy.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    6. Re:Video game consoles, for counterexample by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for the Nook – why not an Amazon Kindle (arguably a better selection) or a full fledge table (better everything, but higher cost)? It just did not land in that sweet spot of cost / performance / selection / ease of use.

      I bought several Nook devices, rather than Kindle. This started when Android still didn't have a good solution for tablets, and I didn't want to wait for Google to get it all sorted out. I liked the Nook hardware, I liked the price, I liked the somewhat more open ecosystem (compared to Kindle), and I liked that the Cyanogenmod community had figured out how to root them.

      The Kindle Fire HD is a nice device, which is popular, which must be hurting Nook. But when the Nook Color tablet first shipped, IMHO it whipped the Kindle offerings at the time.

      These days I do all my reading on my Galaxy Nexus or my Nexus 7. (I gave my rooted Nook Color to my nephew, who can finger-paint, play Angry Birds, etc.)

      I might buy another e-ink Nook but I won't be buying any more Nook tablets. I do have the Nook app installed, though.

      P.S. Most of my ebooks came from O'Reilly or Baen.

    7. Re:Video game consoles, for counterexample by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Jumpers?

      On a Sound Blaster?

      The last sound blaster I recall having jumpers was a farking ISA model. Since going to all PCI in about 1998-9, I've never seen one that ever need any kind of setting...

      Just how old is your computer?!?

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    8. Re:Video game consoles, for counterexample by EvanED · · Score: 1

      As for the Nook â" why not an Amazon Kindle (arguably a better selection) or a full fledge table (better everything, but higher cost)?

      Tablets are worse for reading, IMO; I'm much more of a fan of the Kindle-style e-ink. I haven't tried an iPad Mini, but I suspect they're also heavier.

  9. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 2

    I also like my simple touch. Unfortunately, I have a feeling Microsoft will nuke the ebooks I've bought through B&N just like they did to all the songs marked as "plays for sure".

  10. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do believe that Microsoft bought into B&N after the touch came out. If you bought your touch on day one, it was scum-free.

  11. No more Barnes and Noble? by Animats · · Score: 2

    With no Nook, how will Barnes and Noble survive? They're the last major US bookstore chain, and they've already closed many of their stores.

    1. Re:No more Barnes and Noble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Largely by being the last major US bookstore. It's a shrinking market, but lots of people still do want actual physical books, and the environment that B&N has to sell them in.

      Their only real competition there is small, locally owned type stores, which are unlikely to dominate the market anytime soon.

    2. Re:No more Barnes and Noble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please notice very few small locally owned booksellers have gone out of business recently. Books are apparently a business where small companies do quite well.

    3. Re:No more Barnes and Noble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget B&N got to number one by buying Borders Books.

    4. Re:No more Barnes and Noble? by erice · · Score: 1

      Please notice very few small locally owned booksellers have gone out of business recently. Books are apparently a business where small companies do quite well.

      When is recently? Keep in mind that when a locally owned bookstore closes, it doesn't usually make the national news. Palo Alto has lost two. Stanford Books Store doesn't operate Downtown any more either so maybe that is three. Adjacent Menlo Park has only managed to save Kepler's through extraordinary measures. Now, I don't think any of these events occurred within the last two years but there weren't that many book stores to start with.

      In many areas the chains were all they had.

    5. Re:No more Barnes and Noble? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It may be regional. I've seen far more B&N stores than Borders stores. Borders felt like a flash in the pan, came from out of nowhere and became a fad, then vanished quickly.

    6. Re:No more Barnes and Noble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Stanford bookstore is not what I would call 'locally owned'. It is 'owned' by Stanford and operated by the Follett corporation, which operates 900+ other university bookstores.

    7. Re:No more Barnes and Noble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL.

      Borders went bankrupt, because the market shrank and they were already number two. They were *always* an also-ran. And when B&N bought them, they only bought the name and a list of customers.

  12. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by D1G1T · · Score: 2

    These going away is a good reason to buy one now. The simple touch is great for rooting giving you a pretty good e-ink android tablet. I've been eyeing them on eBay for a couple weeks now. Time to pull the trigger I think.

  13. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well, one issue is that the units auto-update so they can do whatever they want with it. Another is that they basically own your library. A third is that Microsoft has a competing product in the surface. Another is that Microsoft makes it clear that they just Don't Get It(TM) and I don't expect them to do anything good with the Nook and I also don't expect them to leave it alone. And finally, Microsoft has given us many reasons to loathe them over the years.

    But yeah, rant on about fanboyism. That's all it is.

    I'm not going to get rid of mine. I'm going to run my files through calibre and just keep it as an offline device until it is time to replace it (maybe with a Kindle). And I'll install cyanogenmod on my Nook Tablet.

  14. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by butalearner · · Score: 2

    These going away is a good reason to buy one now. The simple touch is great for rooting giving you a pretty good e-ink android tablet. I've been eyeing them on eBay for a couple weeks now. Time to pull the trigger I think.

    You missed out. Yesterday the Simple Touch went on clearance at Radio Shack for $20, and the one with GlowLight was $30. The scum of the Earth, I mean, eBay resellers, will have cleaned them out by now, unless you get super lucky. I snagged the last regular Simple Touch at my local one for a grand total of $20.97 and I'm going to Nooter it this weekend..

  15. Welcome to Hawaii, brought to you by Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand.. if Google farts a particular corporation rains down hard and wants investigations... but IMO Microsoft could probably buy US States right now without so much as a blink from the DOJ, FTC, or others.

    IMO Gates[1] seems to be positioning himself for a power play in the US Government, recently speaking with the blue dress, I mean Clinton.

    [1] Yes, I know, he's not directly working at/for MS this particular point wasn't about MS. But if you must look in that direction, doesn't he still hold some title @ MS?

    IMO, I see Gates as the person, if not eventually at the top of US and/or US/UN, as someone to bring in the Mark of The Beast technology. I've read article after article with people saying, "Oh he's so nice, totally changes the anti-christ view some crazy religious people have been referring to" - and yet the anti-christ will not appear malicious at first! I know you non believers love to brow beat believers with so much scripture you have under your belt! IMO I'm not saying HE or any other individual is or will be the anti-christ but remember there are anti-christ(S).

    Idiocracy and media like it will make it so much smoother than butter to bring in the chip. And after your Google Glass and much more advanced technology, it will appear strange if you're not using it (peer pressure!), but will you be like Wesley Crusher who cries out against it (ST:TNG - Episode "The Game") and tries to bring humanity back to reality?

    1. Re:Welcome to Hawaii, brought to you by Microsoft! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Dear Lord save us from those that don't know their history! The whole book of revelations wasn't accepted as canon for quite awhile because it was written by a guy having fever dreams who basically sat down in a cave when he was burning up with fever and wrote down what he saw. Now if I wrote down what i saw tripping on Peyote, would you think me a prophet?

      Even if you take the rest of the book as gospel and not simply as a book of parables on how to live a better life i don't see how anybody in their right mind could take the ramblings of a guy burning up with fever as a "vision from God" because if that is true? well I bet half the guys here have had a vision from god at least one time in the past.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:Welcome to Hawaii, brought to you by Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok "bassbeast" did you run through the lights with the "beast" and the woman too? Sure seems like most have.. the "snare", the "big club".

      http://www.biblegateway.com/quicksearch/?quicksearch=antichrist&qs_version=KJV

      http://www.biblegateway.com/quicksearch/?quicksearch=anti+christ&qs_version=KJV

      and likely more

    3. Re:Welcome to Hawaii, brought to you by Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need to dial back the dosage of your meds.

    4. Re:Welcome to Hawaii, brought to you by Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh if God came to you while you were using Peyote and saw and wrote down the future per the visions granted to you by Him ... SURE!
      I for one welcome the revelations of our new Profit! ... oh wait I meant to say prophet!
      Hey we are splitting the royalties on the book...right???

  16. Interesting by puddingebola · · Score: 1

    First Microsoft sued Barnes and Noble, and B&N went to court to fight. Then they reached a settlement in which Microsoft agreed to make a large investment in their digital media business. Now Microsoft seems to be about to buy Nook. Next, Windows 8 Mini-tablets? Even with patents, purchasing, and the long march towrds their OS on all tablets, will this work? How many billions will this cost?

  17. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by Perp+Atuitie · · Score: 1

    17 percent stake doesn't give them significant control. Now they can let their shit fly unimpeded. Big difference. Only silver lining is that the remaining stock might sell out for next to nothing, and the Nook is easily modded to run pure Android, IIRC.

  18. What are they buying then ? by bobjr94 · · Score: 1

    It says they will discontinue selling tablets, so what does MS get from the deal ? The Nook brand name with no products ? Does not seem buying it to run a marketplace for a dead end tablet would make sense either.

    1. Re:What are they buying then ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They get the ebook content and publisher contracts. The dedicated ereader market is dying off anyway.

  19. Awesome guys.... by Motard · · Score: 2

    Lesser sites might offer conjectures about why MS might be interested in Nook - or, might not be. Perhaps the up and down sides of such a strategy. That would be interesting to read.

    But ragging on typo's is much more /.. Woot!

    1. Re:Awesome guys.... by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uhhh..that would be two sentences long friend. Why is MSFT interested? iTunes. What are the ups and downs? The ups are the existing customers and the down is they will all be gone in less than 2 years as MSFT hamfistedly tries to force them into a poorly made MSFT ecosystem that costs more than the more popular Apple and Google offerings.

      There ya go Motard, I have covered the entire thing in two sentences. Anybody who says anything other than "Don't buy until we see where they are going with this" can be argued to be a fanboy as the track record on MSFT and consumer products is beyond abysmal, Zune,Kin,Sidekick,Zune market, WinRT, winPhone 7, their track record is poorly thought out products that kill any fan base of the product they buy because they just don't know how to make a compelling product or service in the consumer space.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:Awesome guys.... by Motard · · Score: 0

      iTunes? Huh? You mean textbooks?

      Existing customers? Of what?

      In the end, it took you many more than two sentences just to be dismissive.

    3. Re:Awesome guys.... by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      They want something to pull users in, like how Apple has...drumroll...iTunes, but so far all their attempts at ANY real presence in media has been a giant FAIL, which again look at the products I listed.

      And "Motard" which if you aren't purposely being obtuse in the hopes of stirring shit I'm gonna have to think having "tard" in there is rather telling, one is not being "dismissive" if the ENTIRE HISTORY IS NOTHING BUT FAILURE in a particular market. they have been trying for 10 fucking years to get into mobile devices and its ALL been fails, not ONE hit, not one. And you say its "dismissive" to point out the entire fucking history of the company has been one hamfisted move after another to get into a market they obviously understand about like IBM understands hip hop?

      I'm sorry but you are being obtuse or leaning a little too close to the tard part of your UID, because pointing out a company that has had a laundry list of failures which just FYI left users time and time again with unsupported devices? that is reality. If you wanna wave the WinFlag fine, but don't try to sell us bullshit or pretend that MSFT has a fucking prayer in this arena because unless they fire 2/3rds of the company including the CEO? Not gonna happen. they don't understand the consumer market when it comes to mobile, they have no damned clue about how to even take a semi popular device in that arena and even keep it selling at the level it was when they bought it instead of just fucking cratering the the sales, like it or not motard MSFT has a history of NOTHING but failures in this market so pointing that out? Simply shows i have a functional brain and can remember history. WinCE, Zune,Sidekick, Kin, Zune Market, WinRT...are you REALLY gonna sit there and tell us you don't see a pattern here? Really?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:Awesome guys.... by Motard · · Score: 0

      Wow. You seem to perceive some sort of MS advocacy on my part when I was merely suggesting that we discuss the subject of the article rather than typos. You sound like an embittered Microsoft shareholder.

      Incidentally, 'motard' is a French word. Look it up. You can the translator from Google if Bing burns your eyeballs.

    5. Re:Awesome guys.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What I would buy from Microsoft... it's a handheld device designed to compete with everything: the Vita, an iPod and a phone. It needs to play Xbox 360 games, you should be able to hook it to a TV through its docking station which has speakers to play audio as a standalone media player and is the 2nd charger a small wall charger is also included. The phone works through an included Bluetooth device which also charges off it's cradle in the dock. It's screen is 4 or 5 inches large and it would be nice if it could slide up to reveal a keyboard, it needs an optional case on launch day which makes it an all day usable device. Also, you can add third party markets to it like Amazon's. Complete package phone, dock, and device needs to be less than $750, now I'm excited.

  20. Maybe B&N will come with some nice e-reader by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I know the Nook was ok... Maybe the time has come for B&N to create an actualy good e-reader, like nothing already in the market.

    Or maybe they could stop locking themselves behind plataforms, and create something for all tablet-like devices out there. With unobstrusive or no DRM.

    1. Re:Maybe B&N will come with some nice e-reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think an double blind study would show the Nook was better then Kindle. But yes, the Kindle has a better brand name by far.

    2. Re:Maybe B&N will come with some nice e-reader by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have a simple touch and I think it was a great product. It does well at what you want it to do, show you books. And with very little hacking you can make it do all the stuff you expect it to do, like show you other formats or let you read email or websurf (opera mobile ftw! the only browser usable on NST. you can't count the stock browser, since this is eclair, and it's worse than useless.)

      With that said, I have bought zero books from the nook store, and two books (or was it one?) from amazon. It's hard to see what Microsoft is going to get out of this deal if not the tablets.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  21. Why by Murdoch5 · · Score: 0

    Is this so they screw up another tablet?

  22. Goodbye, Barnes & Noble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After destroying the rotten mall bookstores that came before it (waldenbooks, I'm talking about you), B&N is now facing an internal collapse. This kinda sucks, because I look wandering through shelves, discovering books. With the GOP destroying our government (and publicly-funded libraries), human knowledge is faced with the potential of diminishing. This sucks.

  23. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    I also like my simple touch. Unfortunately, I have a feeling Microsoft will nuke the ebooks I've bought through B&N just like they did to all the songs marked as "plays for sure".

    I buy books from B&N (and occasionally Google, when their prices are better) because I believe in supporting authors and the publishers that put out their books.

    I also immediately crack the books I buy and store copies of them locally and on cloud storage, so I'll never lose them just because the Nook store shuts down. Removing the DRM takes less than a second.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  24. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    Uhhhh...because like those that bought playsforsure devices, Kin and Sidekick he has EVERY right to believe that MSFT will kill support for the existing devices and try to force the owners into a "Microsoft Ecosystem" where the devices cost more than Apple's and the media is more expensive to boot?

    While i'm 100% against rampant flag waving and fanboyism and am quick to call them to the carpet when they do so anybody who owns a device that is bought out by MSFT has every right to seriously think about dumping it before it becomes worthless, just ask those that had a Toshiba beat (which is what became the Zune) how much support they got after MSFT bought it.

    This is coming from somebody who has built, owned, and supported Windows hardware since Win 3.11FW and NT 3 and frankly I wouldn't trust the company either when it comes to the consumer space, their track record is pathetic.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  25. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the heads up, didn't know they were easy to make into an android tablet. I have been noticing in previous weeks that Nooks have been showing up a LOT on sites like IceMonkey and Woot! so I figured something had to be going on with B&N, I just figured they were gonna walk away after losing their shirt against Amazon.

    While I feel sorry for anybody who bought a Nook at full price i can't blame B&N for getting what they can by selling it to MSFT, its just a damned shame that you can say goodbye to the cheap Nooks and Nook Colors as MSFT will probably pull the plug and try to "monetize" the customers by making it a service that only runs on those $$$ Surface pads they can't give away.

    But now that I know they can run Android (Which version? ICS?) I'll have to keep an eye out as i missed out on the cheap Playbooks and Touchpads and the hardware on the Color looks nice, thanks again.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  26. And... They'll ruin it by confused+one · · Score: 1

    I like my Nook. I only use it for reading so it's limitations compared to a tablet never bothered me. Microsoft will likely rip out its basic Android underpinnings and replace them with Windows. The result will be a seemingly underpowered "general purpose" device that tries to do everything (but often not well). More importantly, the battery life will be cut substantially due to Windows lower efficiency. They'll effectively ruin the Nook as an e-reader.

  27. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by D1G1T · · Score: 1

    I'm in Canada and they don't sell em here and eBay is pretty much the easiest option. So I HOPE a lot of eBay scum snatched them up in volume and try to out-do each other on price!

  28. Buying and carrying four tablets by tepples · · Score: 1

    Personally, I buy video game consoles because the games I want to play are released only for consoles.

    No matter what console you buy, you can't play both Super Smash Bros. Brawl and Halo 3 because not only are these exclusive to consoles, but they're also exclusive to different consoles. Do people actually buy and carry an iPad for iOS-only applications, a Nexus tablet for Google Play-only applications, a Kindle Fire for Kindle-only streaming videos, and a Nook for Nook-only whatever?

    For another, why are third- party games "released only for consoles" in the first place? I imagine that it'd be easier to port an Xbox 360 game to Windows than to port it to PlayStation 3 because DirectX for Windows is far more similar to DirectX for Xbox 360 than either is to libgcm for PlayStation 3. Yet Mortal Kombat (2011) is available on Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 but not PC. To continue the analogy, is there some sort of incentive for publishers to make their works available on Nook but not the iBookstore or Google Play Books?

  29. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    And anybody who doesn't think MSFT is a failing company need only look to the history of playsforsure, which for the rest of this I'll call PFS for short.

    At the time PFS was the only real competition that iTunes had and thanks to MSFT taking an open approach to Apple's walled garden was actually growing at a fairly good clip. Not only did just about every PMP other than the iPod have PFS support but there was a whole new market opened up in the "all you can eat" rental model where you were basically given the money you paid for the service each month back in free MP3s and the device only had to be hooked to a PC once a month to re-authorize which let you change out the songs you downloaded through the services. This was actually even getting talk of creating a popular alternative to iTunes as it allowed anybody for $10-$15 a month to have all the songs their PMP could hold while adding more features, such as playlists made by fans of the genres so you could just hook up and get an "all metal" or "just top 40" or whatever playlist loaded to your system with a single touch.

    So what happened? Just as we are seeing now in other arenas MSFT's management couldn't stand the thought of "only" getting a few cents for each MP3 and PMP player sold and instead wanted the entire thing (like Apple surprise surprise) so they killed it figuring "well if they bought from the other guys they will pay us more for the same service, right?" and instead of growing the market, having a real competitor to iTunes, and even having a way to get a toehold into the living room by adding a video plays for sure they instead totally wiped out the entire market almost overnight. In less than a year all the services that used PFS was shuttered, iTunes had no real competition until Amazon came along, and they went from getting a few cents for every MP3 and PMP sold on the planet to getting $0 for each.

    To me this perfectly illustrates how the leadership at MSFT doesn't even understand the market or their strengths but instead are so damned focused on doing things like Apple that they are just killing the company. MSFT is NOT Apple, will never BE Apple, and trying to shoehorn them into that market would be like trying to make IBM popular with hip hop fans, it just isn't gonna work.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  30. Re:And... They'll ruin it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    HA HA!

    It's like... when you have a good idea and it's snatched out of the air by Microsoft Alien Crafts hovering above monitoring every citizen's EEGs and buying their way through the hedge maze.

  31. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

    If they buy it, i'm dumping my simple touch ( which i do love ). Screw them, and the horse they rode in on.

    That's just silly.

    Microsoft has owned a significant (but not majority) steak in Nook for some time, certainly when you purchased your unit. And, what does Nook's future direction (into the toilet) have to do with its past when you purchased your unit from Nook who at that time already had a significant Microsoft ownership?

    Oh, that's right, fan boys and common sense don't mix...

    Not so fast. There are serious ramifications here.

    The Nook is 2 things: A) the Nook hardware, which is what Microsoft is apparently buying out. B) the Nook B&N store, which they presumably aren't, since that part effectively is B&N.

    Without the B&N store, a Nook loses a lot of what it was purchased for, so if Microsoft should drop that particular function in a future OS upgrade, your entire Nook library effectively gets erased. You may be able to install a Nook app to some other device/desktop/phone, but the Nook unit itself might be left unable to serve as a B&N e-reader. This is even more of a problem when you consider that all but the first generation of Nooks keep their B&N purchases in a hidden space inaccessible to the tablet filesystem.

    So there's good reason to get bent here.

  32. Nook to discontinue selling Android tablets .. by dgharmon · · Score: 1

    "Documents reveal that Nook Media plans to discontinue selling tablets and transition to a model under which media is distributed through partners"

    According to the Techcrunch report, Nook Media plans to discontinue its Android-based tablet business. Are these two events related?

    --
    AccountKiller
  33. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by reub2000 · · Score: 1

    Nope. The nook simple touch was released almost a year before microsoft invested in nook. Very plausible that he like me bought it before the deal had been announced.

  34. BN doesn't really make money on the tablet anyway by jdkc4d · · Score: 1

    I think that this makes sense, at least from BN's standpoint. They keep having to drop the cost of the nook to compete, and it turns out they really don't make any money on the device anyway. The whole point of it is so they can sell their books. That's where they make money. Since you can download the nook software on just about any device, why actually have one? As for Msft buying them out. That's a win for BN, and a loss for Msft. Other than the name, I don't see any real reason my Msft would want to purchase it.

  35. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    My Nook Simple-Touch runs straight up Android fine for the most part, few things are buggy and don't work right, but it's not exactly meant to be high power.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  36. Like a drowning swimmer . . . by Gnostic+Teflon · · Score: 1

    . . . grabbing at anything to stay afloat.

  37. Pretty Much Confirmed Already by msft marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you go to the Bellevue MS office and take the elevator to the reception floor to "check in" on the wall of the elevator is a sign offering a nook as a prize for a contest thing. I saw it earlier this week while visiting a friend who works there for lunch, before we got our vistors badges.

    Its publicly posted, in plain view of the public, for anybody who is part of the media or has not signed a NDA to see as they go visit the reception desk to "check in" or visit microsoft. Everybody can see it (until its taken down tomorrow after ms shrills read this post) so its considered a public disclosure.

    Given that internal MS culture would never allow this use of a competeting product otherwise, in my personal opinion it pretty much confirms that its already a done deal.

    That is however only my personal opinion, I do not represent msft, using multiple tor nodes and saying this all so I cant be sued, etc.

  38. Microsoft is terrifying in their incompetence by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    ... They have squandered so much potential and they seem to determined to squander their vast fortune buying out one failed project after another and running it thoroughly into the ground.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  39. Funny thing by symbolset · · Score: 1

    That could have actually worked.

    That did actually work. It's called Android.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Funny thing by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      That did actually work. It's called Android.

      Not really. Android's the most popular mobile OS, yes, but that's just because it's like PCs - it's being put on devices that Apple won't touch.

      Samsung has around 80% of the Android market. But the SGS3, the best selling Android smartphone, only sold 50-odd million phones. Out of the entire Android ecosystem, that's roughly 8-10% of the market - by far the market leader for the model, but a majority of phones sold. That means out of the 8 out of 10 phones Samsung sells, only 1 of them is an SGS3. The other 7? Crap phones you see advertised - SGS2 (yes, they still make them) various flavors, the other crap ones with crappy WVGA screens, or slow processors, or tiny RAM. Basically, super cheap phones the carriers are pushing out to sell everyone a data plan and lock them into whatever crap else there is. (If you look carefully - you'll probably pay MORE for a "dumbphone" than an Android phone). And that's the top seller - the other flagship phones? Not even the radar.

      So by marketshare, Android phones routinely outsell iOS by 3 to 1 or so, or more.

      However, an interesting stat keeps popping up - by data usage, iOS users tend to use their data plans - especially websurfing traffic where Safari tends to out-do Android by 2 to 1. So it seems almost exclusively all the Android traffic is driven by high end flagship phone users (makes sense - they're the ones who tend to be willing to pay and actively choose Android over iOS - the other Android users tend to pick it because they don't want to pay the $200 an iPhone costs (don't argue about the "cheap" models - if you go into any store, only the iPhone 5 is prominently displayed), and carriers are literally shoving phones out the.). Other than mobile OS choice, I'd say flagship Android users would be fairly similar demographically to iPhone users.

      This has resulted in an interesting situation - advertisers who can't target just flagship Android phone users, are basically paying more for iOS ads. And Google, despite having a majority of phones running Android, still makes more money from iOS.

    2. Re:Funny thing by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Some factual glitches: Samsung only makes half of the Android devices. What you call "crap phones" are phones the customer selected because they have some mix of features that the customer prefers. Android phones outsell iPhones by over 4:1, not 3:1, meaning that Samsung by itself sells twice as many phones as Apple. Usage numbers have always been sketchy at best, and always lag sales.

      As iPhones absorb iPods, so Android phones are absorbing other media players. Android devices are also eating into share of other things like smart TVs, tablets and so on. This is where the hugely dominant market share begins to see heavy leverage: when you are invested in apps on a device already and are shopping for a new device, people like to stick with the one that already has all the apps and features they already use on the prior device - especially if they don't have to buy everything all over again. The Apple advantages you speak of all come from first-mover advantage which is now fading fast.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  40. Microsoft has a lot of money by symbolset · · Score: 1

    I see this comment all the time: "Microsoft has the money and revenue streams to play the long game, to make bold bets, to stick it out. Early days yet."

    Well, yes, Microsoft has a lot of money offshore and a lot of money coming in. But they don't have infinite money. The offshore money isn't "real" until they bring it home to spend and take a 40% haircut on it. They're sinking two billion a year into Bing and the rest of OSD, a billion into Nokia, billions in marketing to get their mobile business off the ground and pretend W8 is going super, and tens of billions in share buybacks and dividends to prop up their stock price, tens of billions a year in failed acquisitions. In the wise words of Bill Gates: "A billion here, a billion there and pretty soon it adds up to real money." It is not an inexhaustible spigot. They can "fail" every so often but once in a while they have to "win". They ain't been winning new money for a long time now.

    I'm sorry. I didn't mean to derail your conversation. But when I see this so idly said it makes me sad that so much money is being burned in a hopeless cause when I know what an able, competent, intelligent and compassionate man could do with it.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Microsoft has a lot of money by readingaccount · · Score: 1

      No need to apologize. You're quite right, and in particular about how it seems like they're just wasting money. But as for winning new money, sounds like they're making quite a penny over licensing agreements with Android. So that's something. :)

    2. Re:Microsoft has a lot of money by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The offshore money isn't "real" until they bring it home to spend and take a 40% haircut on it.

      Nah. The solution to that is easy; buy something offshore, instead. Declare that it has little value, and import it (the codebase.) But keep main development in another country, "improve" the product, and declare that it has high value because it is "now" useful. Then you never have to bring the money into the country, but you still get to bring the product into the country, and you can then profit by selling it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Microsoft has a lot of money by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Not to mention HOW many billions have they pissed away in the past 6 years? 40? 50? Hell they paid 8 fricking billion for Skype so I'd say probably at LEAST 50 billion dollars has been crapped away on stupid ideas that had little to no ROI or like in the case of forcing the X360 out before a serious hardware flaw had been fixed actually seriously hurt the company while blowing billions.

      Finally you have to look at the basics, like that old saying about having to know a thing and its nature to fully understand it. Well lets do that with MSFT, where does their profits traditionally come from? sales of Windows and Office...which they have cratered Windows sales thanks to forcing a tablet OS onto the desktop, even though their testers, critics, hell everybody was pointing out it had ZERO chance and made Vista look good by comparison, and then you have office which thanks to the downturn a lot of companies? NOT upgrading. I mean why should they? Office 2K3 and 2K7 work just fine for them and MS Office is pretty much a mature tech, not really any extras you can add that is really gonna be a "killer app" that it doesn't already have, and just like Windows their UI changes are pissing many off who are now sticking to old versions or looking at alternatives. Hell I support SMBs and SOHOs primarily and I can honestly say I don't have a single customer on even 2K10 much less the latest and greatest, its all 2K3 and 2K7 and a few of those are currently testing LO in case MSFT stops support on the version they have without putting out a new version they feel is worth the crazy cost of Office pro licenses.

      So I don't see how they can keep this up, I really don't. I mean they have been able to do this shit in the past, like losing money hand over fist with the Xbox 1 and X360 because the Windows and Office division could cover the losses, but now its the Windows and Office sacred cows that MSFT has gone and trashed enough that many just aren't buying, yet they are still pissing away billions on Bing and a ton of other projects which show zero signs of bringing a dime of ROI into the company. As you said its not infinite, eventually they have to have some positive flow or the accounts will run dry yet MSFT not only shows no signs of reining their spending but if anything they are blowing it faster than ever. If I was a shareholder i'd be pissing my pants right now, the sacred cows aren't selling and one of them is hated yet instead of trying to fix it MSFT seems to be doubling down and blowing more while continuing down a path with zero positive metrics, not a single positive in sight...that's bad, any way you slice it that is bad.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  41. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by dbIII · · Score: 1

    the Nook hardware

    A lot of the e-readers are rebadged Chinese designs with custom software (eg. some of the Kobo line) and the Nook may be in the same boat. MS may just be buying the software and the people that have written it.

  42. So what's the link? by Duncan+J+Murray · · Score: 2

    I don't get the connection between this http://yro.slashdot.org/story/11/11/15/171201/barnes-noble-names-microsofts-disputed-android-patents and what's happening now.

    In fact, because of B&Ns stand, I would have bought a nook here in the UK.

    D

    1. Re:So what's the link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Microsoft is killing Barnes & Noble... No more book stores? Is that how it's going to be?

  43. What's a Nook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And who are Barnes & Noble?

    Speaking as a UK consumer I couldn't give a flying toss in a hurricane.

    1. Re:What's a Nook? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      It's a chain of bookstores in the US. They also have a web site where they sell books direct much like Amazon sells books.

  44. Re:And... They'll ruin it by 0racle · · Score: 1

    I doubt the old nook and nook color will have windows 8 ported to it. I doubt the nook color could run it, but the newer nook tablet might. Or they'll just stop updates and create a Nook Surface if they want to continue making hardware.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  45. The scent of failure by sjbe · · Score: 1

    So Nook was a failure for B&N?

    Pretty much. They're pretty much getting their asses handed to them by Amazon, Apple and Google. I'm not sure I know anyone who actually owns a Nook though obviously they have been selling a fair number. When people think technology, Barnes & Noble isn't exactly the first name that springs to mind. Though the Nook seems to be a decent product it has the vague scent of desperation about it. Given what happened with Borders one has to wonder if they are buying a product that is going to be abandoned by B&N down the road.

    1. Re:The scent of failure by wwphx · · Score: 1

      I have one, and I like it. I haven't rooted it yet, hope to do that later this summer. Bought it for my wife for Xmas a couple of years ago, she didn't care for it. I started using it a month ago and quite like it for reading books off Project Gutenberg. Just finished the first volume of letters from Ludwig Von Beethoven and The Great Gatsby. 1984 and the second collection of B's letters are up next.

      I didn't want a Kindle because of the Mobi requirement and the conversion that you had to do to read epub. I also prefer to avoid giving money to monocultures if I can avoid it, which isn't often.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  46. Re:Anyone want to buy mine? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

    the Nook hardware

    A lot of the e-readers are rebadged Chinese designs with custom software (eg. some of the Kobo line) and the Nook may be in the same boat. MS may just be buying the software and the people that have written it.

    I think we can safely say that B&N doesn't own any "Nook Factories" that they sold to Microsoft, so it would be the Nook IP and channels that's being transferred. The Nooks are not, however generic devices with a Nook badge slapped on them, however, as you swiftly learn when a cable goes bad.

    However much of the insides are commodity parts (and sooner or later, almost everything electronic incorporates commodity parts), there are definitely bits of bespoke hardware, and the Nook OS itself is a secretive version of Android.

  47. How to tell you're dead or fading fast? by crovira · · Score: 1

    Microsoft buys you.

    Farewell Nook, we hardly knew ya.

    The sale of, uh, partnership agreement of the Nook should shore up B&N for a week or two.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.