Slashdot Mirror


DHS Shuts Down Dwolla Payments To and From Mt. Gox

An anonymous reader sends this excerpt from BetaBeat: "The Department of Homeland Security appears to have shut down the ability to use Dwolla, a mobile payment service, to withdraw and deposit money into Mt. Gox, a Bitcoin trading platform. ... A representative for Dwolla told Betabeat that the company is 'not party' to this matter and encourages those with questions to reach out to Mt. Gox or the DHS. 'The Department of Homeland Security and U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland issued a 'Seizure Warrant' for the funds associated with Mutum Sigillium's Dwolla account (a.k.a. Mt. Gox),' he said. 'In light of the court order, procured by the Department of Homeland Security, Dwolla has ceased all account activities associated with Dwolla services for Mutum Sigillum while Dwolla's holding partner transferred Mutum Sigillium's balance, per the warrant.'"

302 comments

  1. It's started... by curunir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The government finally decided to care and used the one achilles heel of BitCoin...conversion to and from dollars. If BitCoin had some innate value, it wouldn't be a problem, but since it's primary use is as an exchange currency for dodging taxes and selling goods on the black market, this change is going to seriously impact the value of the currency.The government can't control BitCoin, but it can control US financial institutions and other companies that need to interact with those financial institutions.

    We'll now see how well the BitCoin market can operate as a completely stand-alone entity.

    --
    "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    1. Re:It's started... by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Flash-news for you, there are other currencies apart from the $$....

    2. Re:It's started... by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      I think you're giving them too much credit. The DHS, like the TSA, is a very stimulus-driven organism. More likely they discovered some suspicious activity was utilizing Dwolla with Bitcoin, and decided to break the link between the two. The intelligence community in the US generally avoids bad PR as long as possible.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    3. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Remember the online poker craze? It basically died without access to the USD.

    4. Re:It's started... by fredprado · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No modern currency has innate value.

    5. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still eagerly waiting for people to show me the "innate value" of the dollar. Something that does not require me to go back to the times where conversion to gold was guaranteed.

    6. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin is already destined to crash and burn when they exhaust the supply of chumps they need to create the illusion of being a profitable investment opportunity.

      Hopefully the disappearance of one convenient way to exchange them for $$$ will make the influx of fresh money dry up that much sooner.

    7. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dwolla isnt the ONLY payment processor that does USD. Also a lot of the exchanges offer direct deposit.

    8. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but none that matter in the grand scheme of things.

    9. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just in! MtGOX supports conservative politicians!

      Seriously, I find it cute how some people believe that virtual currency with total value of ~$1e9 and daily trade volume of ~$30e6 is seen by The Evul Guvmint as a big threat they have to suppress (and not, you know, just another probable fraud/gambling laws/money laundering laws/tax laws violation they deal with daily)

    10. Re:It's started... by LordLimecat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Neither does gold, by that logic.

    11. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remind me again why Obama hasn't been impeached yet?

      Hes still a hundred times better than the last guy and didnt slaughter Americans for profit. You asked.

    12. Re:It's started... by trout007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All value is subjective.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    13. Re:It's started... by LordLimecat · · Score: 5, Informative

      In what way does gold have innate value?

      In a rare display of insight, yahoo answers actually explains why the whole premise is absurd...
      http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120303200416AABp0fx

    14. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except they didn't prevent you from simply using a bank wire.

    15. Re:It's started... by MickLinux · · Score: 1

      Because the last time, when the Republic Revolution frehmen impeached a guilty Clinton, they were removed from office by the Management.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    16. Re:It's started... by superwiz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Using midwestern accents to suggest that mistrust of the government is only common among the ignorant is soooo.... last week.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    17. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    18. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in the US, in that case. I still see plenty of online poker ads on TV in fair Albion! (Although, tbh, I doubt you're not missing out on much as a result of your lack of online poker...)

    19. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things (at least, for now and for a long time yet). Whole BTC economy is smaller than any of major corporations (and most of minor ones).

      Walmart moves a billion USD daily just in form of revenue. All BTC transactions for a day sum up to around 1/30 of that.

    20. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Innate may be a bad word for it, but national currencies have the built-in value of being able to pay the taxes that allow you to reside in that country. The US dollar also has the distinct advantage of being useful for purchasing oil (and an army that's willing to bomb into the stone age any oil producer that tries to change that.)

    21. Re:It's started... by MickLinux · · Score: 1

      The dollar does not have innate value. Fair dealing, honesty, people working together for good, charity, hope, investment, diligence: these things have innate value.

      Once upon a time, the dollar was a mathematical variablerepresentation of these things. At that time, it appeared to have innate value. However, as people started to value it as having its own innate value, they separated the dollar from its represented values, and its actual innate value has started to become apparent.

      It is entirely possible that the day could come when people will offer vast estates, for any who is willing to separate them from their dollars.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    22. Re:It's started... by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to defend him, but the last guy ordered capture and detainment. The current guy by far prefers drone strikes, most of which include civilian casualties, and many of which are ONLY civilian casualties (i.e. no terrorist was hit in the strike.)

      http://www.policymic.com/articles/16949/predator-drone-strikes-50-civilians-are-killed-for-every-1-terrorist-and-the-cia-only-wants-to-up-drone-warfare
      http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/25/world/asia/pakistan-us-drone-strikes

      Also, the last guy didn't lie about WMD's. Yes, there were none, that much is true. However the belief that they were there is not just what the last guy beheld, but numerous other nations did as well. Basically everybody believed there were WMD's, not just the US. It isn't a lie unless you were unaware that you weren't speaking the truth.

      Now the current guy? He actively and knowingly lies about who he targets:

      http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/04/09/188062/obamas-drone-war-kills-others.html

      If you want to talk about innocents being killed, the current guy is much worse. That, and he himself made the argument that he has the right to hit Americans with drone strikes without due process. Personally I'm happy with the one time that this has been done because that asshole had it coming, but it still sets a bad precedent.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    23. Re:It's started... by fredprado · · Score: 5, Informative

      Gold has some innate value in the sense that it can be used directly to build stuff. It is just a much lesser value than its current market value at the moment. Fiat currencies have absolute no innate value.

    24. Re:It's started... by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 0

      Oops, editing mistake on that one. Flip the logic of the lying sentence.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    25. Re:It's started... by fredprado · · Score: 1

      That is virtual value that can cease to be in a moment, in the same way bitcoin value can. Sure, governments with strong economies can keep their currencies healthy, but any economy can dive nose down very quickly and unpredictably given the right (or wrong) circumstances.

    26. Re:It's started... by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      Even that "innate value" is only value because of the uses we apply to it. It is not an intrinsic property to the gold itself.

      More practically, the "innate value" you describe is very low, and comprises a teeny percentage of the gold we mine and stockpile.

    27. Re:It's started... by gatfirls · · Score: 1

      Yes, all of those other currencies the exchanges trade at in the .01% range.

    28. Re:It's started... by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 2

      Taking totalitarian methods, ramping every last fucking one of them up, and adding a few of your own now equals better? Good to know.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    29. Re:It's started... by fredprado · · Score: 2

      Any value comes from the use we apply to stuff. "Innate value" comes from the value something has on its own, without some external source adding value to it. Gold does have innate value because it would still be required to create many things even if all governments in the planet ceased to be tomorrow. The money in your bank account does not. If you have some cash it may still be used to make a good fire and warm your feet, though.

      That said, yes, gold current value comes more from it being used as a currency (and stored increasing its scarcity) than from its innate value, and therefore the former is considerable greater than the latter.

    30. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If my currency was predicated on people needing to pay taxes, I'd say it's got a solid base.

    31. Re:It's started... by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      It's always been funny to me, I find it silly that Humans all but worship Element 79, other Metals and Paper. The only value any of it has, is the value given to it by feeble Human minds.

    32. Re:It's started... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Increased drone strike at a time when the tech/cost ration begins to maximize? I'm shocked.

      No, he isn't. You are comparing a type of attack that wasn't common under the previous guy to all innocents killed.

      Under bush over 100K innocents where killed using non drone technology.

      Drone tech is more precise, cheaper and easier to use. Is it perfect? no, but either where pilots flying aircraft in the fields.

      The fact that drones are an issue only underlines how desperate the republican media is to pin anything on the current president.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    33. Re:It's started... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      BY you're logic sand should be the currency.
      not that I am surprised to see yet another person on /. not know jack about currency:

      Fiat money is money that derives its value from government regulation or law. SO it has value, even innate value.

      Innate is not the word you want. 'intrinsic value' is what you are looking for; look up intrinsic Value theory.

      When talking economic, value USUALLY means An amount, as of goods, services, or money, considered to be a fair and suitable.
      SO fiat money has value, by definition.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    34. Re:It's started... by ADRA · · Score: 1

      Gold surely has an innate value, but it isn't nearly as high as it's current asset value which relies on people valuing its ability to 'hold' wealth, like land, jadda jadda... any other asset.

      But certainly, people wear gold, and electronics and various other industries use gold for its amazing maliability and conductivity.

      --
      Bye!
    35. Re:It's started... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Informative

      why do you think Europe were so anti invasion?

      Primarily because the leading politicians were pocketing large amounts of cash from Saddam Hussein's government (or did you miss the revelations about how much money various European politicians were discovered to have received from that government after its fall?).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    36. Re:It's started... by pla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The government finally decided to care and used the one achilles heel of BitCoin...conversion to and from dollars.

      Why would you consider that an achilles' heel? Those of us using BitCoin use it because it blows the dollar away for convenience in certain types of transactions (by which I don't mean "drugs" - Tide Unscented remains the king there, followed by US cash). In particular, any movement of small amounts of money (in the $100 range) between countries typically takes upwards of 50% of the total in various fees (and that assumes 1st-world countries with more-or-less legitimate banking and postal systems on both ends of the transaction).

      So, for the reasons I would choose to denominate a given transaction in Bitcoins, the ability to convert it directly to USD has little to no value.


      We'll now see how well the BitCoin market can operate as a completely stand-alone entity.

      So far, the exchange rate (even if "exchange" may have just become a lot harder) hasn't even dipped outside the normal standard daily swings for USD:BTC. We'll see if the market panics tomorrow, but I wouldn't count on it. I don't use BitCoin because of its value in dollars, and neither, I suspect, do most of its (non-speculating) users.

    37. Re:It's started... by NotSanguine · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you want to talk about innocents being killed, the current guy is much worse. That, and he himself made the argument that he has the right to hit Americans with drone strikes without due process. Personally I'm happy with the one time that this has been done because that asshole had it coming, but it still sets a bad precedent.
      Emphasis Added

      More than 92,000 civilian deaths in Iraq via armed conflict from 2003-2008

      4000 deaths by drone strike since 2004

      Please! Get some facts straight there friend.

      Blowing my mod points on this thread as you clearly need correcting.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    38. Re:It's started... by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      The only value any of it has, is the value given to it by feeble Human minds.

      Well yeah, but that's the value that matters. The whole point of currency is that you can trade it for goods and services from... humans (including their feeble minds).

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    39. Re:It's started... by Jeremi · · Score: 0

      The fact that drones are an issue only underlines how desperate the republican media is to pin anything on the current president.

      Also along those lines -- if anyone thinks that a contemporary Republican administration would be avoiding the use of drones for moral reasons, I've got a bridge to sell them.

      There are lots of valid points against the use of drones, but given their recent foreign policy history, Republicans are not people with any credibility to make them. Hell, they still can't decide whether they're for or against torture.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    40. Re:It's started... by click2005 · · Score: 1

      Walmart also has lawyers & lobbyists protecting them.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    41. Re:It's started... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Remind me again why Obama hasn't been impeached yet?

      Maybe he smoked all the cigars?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    42. Re:It's started... by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      Haven't you heard? Online poker is on its way back but now the government gets its cut by licensing and taxing it which was what the ban on offshore online poker companies was all about...

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    43. Re:It's started... by green1 · · Score: 1

      But certainly, people wear gold, and electronics and various other industries use gold for its amazing maliability and conductivity.

      Minor nit-pick, gold is actually not a great conductor, it's prized property is that it doesn't generally corrode, that's why connectors are usually gold plated, and not entirely gold. the plating keeps the corrosion at bay, and the underelying metal conducts better.

      Gold is "valuable" for it's uses in many industries, including electronics, chemistry, and jewlery. People also drive the price up because they think it will protect them from a crash of fiat currency, but I don't really believe that people would revert to using gold if civilization fell apart, more likely people would barter for things of more immediate importance, food, shelter, heating fuel, clothing, etc. Gold would have relatively little value in such a society.

    44. Re:It's started... by fredprado · · Score: 2

      Like Zimbabwean dollars?

    45. Re:It's started... by fredprado · · Score: 1

      Innate value is intrinsic value. In this context innate and intrinsic are synonyms. And no, I haven't said anything that would imply sand or anything else (including dollars) should or should not be currencies. Sand does have innate value though, albeit low, differently from dollars.

      Fiat money does have value, and again, nowhere I said or implied it does not, but it has no innate value, in the very same way bitcoins do not.

    46. Re:It's started... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Right. So if you see a gold nugget or a piece of gold jewelry on the ground I expect you not to pick it up because it has no value.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    47. Re:It's started... by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's rare. It doesn't rust. It barely reacts with anything at all. It's highly malleable. It's ductile. It conducts electricity. It has plenty of desirable properties. The fact that it's a rare metal that will never corrode makes it perfect as a store of wealth. You can argue all you want with thousands of years of human history. You're still wrong.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    48. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News flash: all currencies are "fiat", and nothing has any "innate" value.

    49. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually come to think of it, both Gold and BitCoin have value for pretty much the same reason. While gold does have some practical uses, almost all of its value comes from its limited supply and people's demand for it. BitCoin's value is pretty much the same - its value comes from its limited supply and people's demand for it.

    50. Re:It's started... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      So so silly, it's a pretty good element.

      It's a good conductor of electricity and heat
      It's easy to work with.
      It's non-toxic.
      It plays nice with other elements.
      Its very "non-reactive" only certian acids will dissolve it.

      It's used in industry, electronics, food and medicine.

    51. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like you'll walk by if you see a bunch of dollars on the ground - useless paper!

      Concept of intrinsic value seems to be lost on you.

    52. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In what way does your comment have innate value?

      In the way it distills the essence of the taskchair economist?

    53. Re:It's started... by Teancum · · Score: 2

      Walmart also has lawyers & lobbyists protecting them.

      Give it time. There will be lobbyists who advocate for Bitcoin eventually, and there certainly are constituencies involved.

      Unfortunately at the moment, most of the people who use Bitcoins are either irrelevant (die-hard libertarians and anarchists) or don't bother even casting their ballot in the first place (many computer nerds and younger people eligible to vote). As a result, the constituents are really pretty much ignored.

      Regardless, Bitcoins are trading more than almost any other alternative currency system that has been set up in America (or elsewhere for that matter) in more than a hundred years.... MMORPGs being the one possible exception. World of Warcraft gold vs. Eve ISK vs. Bitcoins is a more relevant comparison at the moment, where Bitcoins do compare quite favorably. Bitcoins certainly does better than other alternative currencies like Ithica Hours (another semi-successful alternative currency).

    54. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the exception of Rand Paul, who recently reversed his opposition anyway, there is no meaningful Republican opposition to drones. There has been, in fact, muted praise from the GOP on Obama's escalation of hostilities.

      The only people opposed to drones are the anti-war left and libertarians.

    55. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      " Fiat currencies have absolute no innate value."
      Nonsense. If you choose small Italian cars as your unit of currency, they can always be driven, (providing value) no matter how much you've devalued them.

    56. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thousands of years of human history prove we like shiny things.

      Don't fool yourself. All those properties can be found in lots of other materials which lack one property: being pretty. This is what made gold valuable (or rather, overvalued) for thousands of years of human history - or do you think feudal lords valued it for "inert" and "conducts electricity"?

    57. Re:It's started... by Teancum · · Score: 3, Insightful

      News flash: all currencies are "fiat", and nothing has any "innate" value.

      Actually, that would be news if it was true. You are simply wrong.

      Gold, silver, and other commodities can and have been used as currencies (even cattle... hence stock certificates) where those commodities are not only exchanged as money but also have value in and of themselves even if they weren't money. I've even used long distance minutes (another commodity) as a genuine currency for purchasing items that had nothing to do with its actual "innate value" like talking to my mother on Mother's Day.

      There are fiat currencies though, like the U.S. Dollar and Euros. Those can't be used for anything other than money. But there are plenty of non-fiat currencies as well.... as the U.S. Dollar used to be once upon a time.

    58. Re:It's started... by Teancum · · Score: 2

      Right. So if you see a gold nugget or a piece of gold jewelry on the ground I expect you not to pick it up because it has no value.

      Here is a better analogy: If you could manufacture unlimited quantities of Gold with your handy replicator which rearranges atoms on the fly with transporter technology..... would you still be using gold or silver? This is assuming of course that the Mr. Fusion home reactor operating off of tap water also provides unlimited cheap energy to power the replicator.

      A society with such devices wouldn't give a damn about things like Euros, but gold and silver would still have some value. In fact, a gold nugget might even have more value... assuming you found it in nature as opposed to some fancy design.

    59. Re:It's started... by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 1

      If you're going to compare BTC to MMO currencies, don't forget Linden Dollars. Those are still kicking somehow.

    60. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I finally have to ask, Who the fuck is the Department of Homeland security and where did they come from? Anyone?

      Oh wow: Captcha: Awaking

    61. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... Poor analogy.

      Gold in such society would be about as valuable as paper or plastic those Euros are printed on (which still might be circulated even then as currency), and upon seeing a gold nugget on the road you'd think "Damn, who's littering?"

      But even missing the point you wanted to prove, you've done good to show how both Euros and other currencies are worth more than paper they're printed on, and gold's worth more than just stainless plating because market agreed to value it thus.

      Thing's intrinsic value matters for barter, not when you use it as currency.

    62. Re:It's started... by dnaumov · · Score: 2

      (or did you miss the revelations about how much money various European politicians were discovered to have received from that government after its fall?).

      Raises hand.

      Sources please?

    63. Re:It's started... by AuMatar · · Score: 2

      Sounds great to me. I always paid my taxes on online poker winnings anyway. I just want to be able to play a tourney at night every now and again.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    64. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Remind me again why Obama hasn't been impeached yet?

      Michelle gives great blowjobs, so he hasn't done the Wild Thang yet with his interns.

    65. Re:It's started... by Myopic · · Score: 0

      I was converted away from your opinion by this podcast. There are not, in fact, "lots of other materials" with all those properties. In fact, there is only gold. I listened to that with an open mind and I was convinced.

    66. Re:It's started... by centipedes.in.my.vag · · Score: 1

      There are a plethora of people opposed from various groups. Don't be so exclusionary. It's much easier to say that the GOP's position is X, rather than saying "The only people who think Y are...", and you'll be a whole lot less wrong for it too.

      --
      Only on /. can I lose karma with 2x "5, Funny" posts.
    67. Re:It's started... by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      Iridium is rare, hard, doesnt corrode, and is very durable. There are other metals as well. As a conductor, copper is better. In fact, I believe physically, silver generally has superior properties in most regards.

      The question of why gold has value today is probably best answered "because it had value yesterday". If you go far enough back, Im not sure what that answer would be, but Im pretty sure "it was the best possible choice" isnt it.

    68. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're going to compare BTC to MMO currencies, don't forget Linden Dollars. Those are still kicking somehow.

      They're shutting down the exchanges on those, too:
      http://www.hypergridbusiness.com/2013/05/lindens-no-outside-currency-trading/
      http://www.hypergridbusiness.com/2013/05/currency-venues-fight-for-survival/

      Of course, Secondlife still has it's own exchange which can convert into dollars; but will probably be monitored up the wazoo if it continues to exist.

      Posting anonymously because I need to get a first life, not karma.

    69. Re:It's started... by budgenator · · Score: 4, Funny

      Remind me again why Obama hasn't been impeached yet?

      Because then Biden would be President.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    70. Re:It's started... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      How about this: Gold's innate value is about 3 to 5% more than Copper's innate value, but less than silver's innate value.

    71. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because that's all it's used for... drugs and tax dodging. I see you've been reading the corporate bank newsletters again.

    72. Re:It's started... by Myopic · · Score: 0

      You're pretty sure? Well I'm pretty sure you didn't listen to the podcast. They cover iridium (too rare) and copper (not rare enough). There are other important characteristics too, such as melting point and testability. In the end they qualify gold as the only element left standing as the best precious metal for trade.

    73. Re:It's started... by neo8750 · · Score: 1

      As true as that maybe but i feel that it has to due with the fact he is black. Think about it how would it look if the 1st black president (even if elected twice) was impeached? The anti-racist crowd would eat it up quicker then a fat kid with an all you can eat pass at a candy store.

    74. Re:It's started... by rthille · · Score: 1

      I should listen to the podcast, but I've got things to do... What about Platinum?

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    75. Re:It's started... by plonk420 · · Score: 1

      "black market"? i renewed domain names sans cash because of bitcoin.

    76. Re:It's started... by saleenS281 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, one such example would be the oil-for-food program. Russia was by far the greatest abuser, but not the only one by any means. France is on that list as expected:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil-for-Food_Programme#Beneficiaries

    77. Re:It's started... by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      Platinum is used heavily by the automobile industry... and of course, the secret to pay off the U.S. National Debt overnight .

    78. Re:It's started... by reve_etrange · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Of course a stock certificate has no intrinsic value - it's value is proportional to the ability of the issuer to redeem the certificate for actual livestock. Gold and other precious metals do have value in and of themselves; we value them for their appearance and physical properties, which are suitable to manufacture of jewelry and (today) certain electronic components, nanoparticles, etc.

      As a currency, however, gold and silver have always required a state actor (i.e. "fiat") to guarantee metal content and enforce demand through taxation. This fact was made especially clear in the early Middle Ages. After the Roman Empire had collapsed in the West, gold coins (the solidus and triente) virtually disappeared from Europe, with silver denarii arising only as regional governments gained sufficient strength to enforce taxes. At first, these taxes would be paid "in kind" (essentially, food - the "in kind" produce of the land). Subsequently, taxes would be collected in coin, but only after the government had begun minting them and distributing them into the hands of citizenry.

      Even during the "free minting" period, the value of currency vis-a-vis raw metal was determined via the mint fee and seniorage; free mints were free as in speech (if you had silver), rather than beer.

      One important qualification is the low labor productivity at that time. The vulnerability to famine which obtains when the average worker produces just 1.8 person-years of food per year creates a high bar to any potential currency.

      I highly recommend Peter Spufford's Money and its Use in Medieval Europe, which goes into insane-but-captivating detail on the above issues. It's an essential read if you want to understand the nature of pure fiat, metal-backed (convertible, less than 100% coverage) and metal-based (coins = weight of metal) currencies, and what features are shared by all three currency regimes.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    79. Re:It's started... by reve_etrange · · Score: 2

      Of course, but other people have already stated and demonstrated a willingness to accept gold as payment. It's quite circular to say that this is the origin of its value.

      What is more interesting are the conditions which led to the first gold-accepting person accepting gold (before which gold did not have "intrinsic" value.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    80. Re:It's started... by reve_etrange · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Boom.

      Seriously, I am tired of the circular logic underlying much of these arguments. Whatever initial condition led to acceptance of gold, etc. in lieu of in-kind payments, it was not "because I can buy stuff with it."

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    81. Re:It's started... by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      You should read Medieval Money and its Uses, by Peter Spufford. Indeed, when the Roman Empire collapsed in the West, gold fell out of use in favor of informal debt systems. Silver coinage was gradually re-introduced as West European governments regained the ability to collect taxes and use minted coins to fund state expenditures, thus introducing the coins into their economies.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    82. Re:It's started... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Gold has the third best conductivity of any known element. Only copper and silver are better. It's a better conductor than aluminum and far less reactive. So, yes, I'd call it a pretty good conductor. When you need a conductor that doesn't corrode there is nothing better.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    83. Re:It's started... by nbauman · · Score: 1

      The two best sources for the number of deaths in Iraq are a study published in The Lancet, which estimated 650,000 deaths, to 2006, and a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, which estimated 150,000 deaths. The best evidence-based estimate is that it's somewhere in between those two.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War

      Both studies were done by investigators who had done these war estimates before, and actually went to Iraq to poll people in the field.

      That's not true of the Iraq Body Count, which was put together by some anonymous guys who stayed home clipping English language newspapers. They make the dubious assumption that every death was reported in the newspaper and reprinted in an English language newspaper.

      Since you want to get the facts straight.

    84. Re:It's started... by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      You are ill-informed (go figure). There are many other methods to convert Bit-coin to USD. The two services listed where not anonymous for transferring bit-coin in the first place so this changes nothing....

    85. Re:It's started... by tibman · · Score: 1

      I thought it was because Saddam owed some other countries money? If the government toppled then the debt would never be paid.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    86. Re:It's started... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      I'm still eagerly waiting for people to show me the "innate value" of the dollar. Something that does not require me to go back to the times where conversion to gold was guaranteed.

      Oil is sold in dollars.

    87. Re:It's started... by Teancum · · Score: 2

      There have been and still are private mints which produce coins. It certainly doesn't require a government to certify the purity and weight of a coin (although that can help in many cases). Government monopolies on coinage are quite common though and private mints have always been a little tricky (even today).

      As for certificates of deposit of various kinds (including gold and silver certificates), while the certificates may not in and of themselves have intrinsic value, they do represent items which possess such value. Ultimately the value of those certificates is how reliable the organization which issued them actually can redeem those certificates. As has been the case in recent history, often even governments that once promised to redeem such certificates will instead renounce them or turn them into fiat currency instruments, so there is a genuine danger to holding them.

      BTW, thanks for the reference. I would like a chance to read it and will look it up in my local library.

    88. Re:It's started... by fredprado · · Score: 1

      Sure, but nobody does that. Considering you are giving value to the currency by law the lower its cost the better. That is why no fiat currency in existence has any innate value.

    89. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wasn't aware that anything had innate value. Some things have value to many people, but it isn't as if there is a magical entity who decides something has value.

    90. Re:It's started... by ne0n · · Score: 1

      Biden, that's the thing you pee in and it pees back at you?

      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
    91. Re:It's started... by jwdb · · Score: 2

      Gold has some innate value in the sense that it can be used directly to build stuff.

      Yes, and paper money can be used to do origami, and pennies can be used as floor tiles. It just happens that we currently value gold-based jewelry and electronics more than origami, but I don't assume this will necessarily always be the case.

      Anything can be used for something if you're creative enough.

    92. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Gold will cause heavy metal poisoning if you ingest enough of it so its not exactly non-toxic...

    93. Re:It's started... by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      This appears to be a common sentiment here on Slashdot, but the concept of money does indeed have value in an economy quite apart from any additional value that the monetary commodity may or may not itself possess. Ask yourself, what is the purpose of money? Why do we use money when we could use barter instead? In a word, efficiency. If I have milk to trade and you have a car to trade and I want the car but you don't want the milk then I must take time and effort to find someone who wants milk and is willing to trade me something that you want so that I can come back to you and trade for the car. It's entirely possible that I might have to make a great many such trades in sequence before I can finally acquire the commodity that you want for the car and even then there are no guarantees. For example, I may be unable to organize a series of trades that ends with me trading you for the car on a given day and even if I can all of this takes time and effort that I could have spent doing something else which is also a cost. Money solves what economists call the coincidence of wants problem by creating an artificial commodity that everyone wants simply to facilitate exchanges and thus save everyone time and effort. We all participate in this system willingly because we're better off participating than refusing to use the money and demanding barter instead. Indeed a large and complex modern economy would not be possible without a stable unit of account to serve as money. The fact that the idea of money has arisen independently many times in different cultures who had no contact with each other proves that the development of a money commodity is a natural evolutionary step along the path to organized and complex society.

      The reason why gold was so often chosen, at least before electronics and computers become widely available, was that it's rare enough and compact enough to serve as a meaningful unit of account while at the same time being easy to recognize, difficult to fake, easy to subdivide or recombine and relatively impervious to rot, corrosion, rust, tarnish or other forms of degradation. In preindustrial societies there really wasn't anything better to serve as the monetary commodity wherever gold and to a lesser extent silver were available in sufficient quantities.

    94. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the Megajoule.

    95. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can exchange cash for coins... on SR.

    96. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It density makes it the least expensive of any substance which can pass inspection by scale. Only Tungsten comes close to the specific gravity / price ratio of gold.

      The utility value of being virtually impossible to counterfeit gold well enough to fool a scale is high.

    97. Re:It's started... by LoneTech · · Score: 1

      Actually, the shininess of gold is a direct consequence of its electrical and chemical properties. It's metallic, which causes the shine via electromagnetic reflection, and it stays shiny because it doesn't corrode easily. Similarly diamonds (and rubies, and sapphires) have particular value for their mechanical and optical properties; the very same that made them pretty and resilient. In conclusion, any other material with those properties will also be pretty, so your assertion is incorrect. Other properties did contribute to the use in trade and decoration, such as weight and malleability.

    98. Re:It's started... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      That lists countries, not politicians.

      Europe offered Iraq food for oil.
      USA offers rebuilding their infrastructure which they first bombed for Iraq oil. Of course Hussein wouldn't go for that so Hussein had to be killed.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    99. Re:It's started... by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

      People who sell drugs have to eat. Grocery stores don't accept bitcoins.

    100. Re:It's started... by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      The two best sources for the number of deaths in Iraq are a study published in The Lancet, which estimated 650,000 deaths, to 2006, and a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, which estimated 150,000 deaths. The best evidence-based estimate is that it's somewhere in between those two. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War

      Both studies were done by investigators who had done these war estimates before, and actually went to Iraq to poll people in the field.

      That's not true of the Iraq Body Count, which was put together by some anonymous guys who stayed home clipping English language newspapers. They make the dubious assumption that every death was reported in the newspaper and reprinted in an English language newspaper.

      Since you want to get the facts straight.

      Thanks for the clarification and the cites. You make my point better than I did. As should be obvious, I was giving the lie to the GPs assertion that drone strikes were killing so many more people than anything else. I just don't get how people can be so rabid that they spout complete nonsense just to attack someone they don't like. There are plenty of things to skewer Obama (and I voted for him -- twice) over without resorting to distortions and outright falsehoods. Sigh.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    101. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, this is bullshit. It amounts to saying that if you're using cash instead of paying everything by credit card, you must obviously be a tax-dodging drug-dealing terrist. Congratulations on blaming the victim here.

      The problem, if any, with bitcoin is that its records aren't as useful to the DHS as all the paper trails banks feed automatically to various government databases. But I think it may not even be that, as in fact mt.gox is rather fascist about "verifying" who you are before letting you swap currencies, to meet rather fascist anti-terrist and other such regulations.

      This action is fairly curious since dwolla is but one way to transfer fiat to and from mt.gox, and also that it is in fact a Japanese company. They could be courting an international spat, though what got attacked is probably the USoA subsidiary set up to interact with dwolla. They might not care, but it would yet again show American[tm] high-handedness that growing parts of the rest of the world could do without.

      Anyhow, it's not the end of the world for bitcoin, probably not even for mt.gox.

    102. Re:It's started... by philip.paradis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Referring to the DHS as a legitimate member of the intelligence community is beyond laughable. They're effectively a domestic secret police outfit that operates at the behest of the executive branch, and they can't seem to get most of that right, let alone serious intelligence work. The CIA, NSA, and FBI comprise the effective intelligence apparatus of the United States, and with any luck DHS activities will be severely curtailed in coming years. Incidentally, the TSA is a child agency of the DHS.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    103. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remind me again why Obama hasn't been impeached yet?

      Because the rest of the critters in both houses aren't any better. 'sides, he didn't set these agencies up, to general acclaim of again the rest of the critters.

      Also, this one's probably the brainwave of some flunky that'll be there still come next administration. If you'd like to impeach the top dog for the actions of the rest of the pack, you might sooner impeach him over the bunch that induced Schwartz to kill himself.

      The parallel with that case is actually quite interesting once you see it: Rabid bureaucrats trying for "results", no matter the cost, and a strong "us vs. them" (government vs. the people, any people the world over) attitude within government.

      So I say that merely impeaching the supposed buckstopper isn't enough. You'd need to kick out a large part of the government and rebuild it from scratch. Admittedly, he already failed miserably in his promises to do exactly that to one specific part of the government, qv gitmo.

    104. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody on that list (from the UK or France at least) has anywhere close to enough influence to affect war policy. Try again.

    105. Re:It's started... by tonfagun · · Score: 2

      Oh, one day there will be a golden age where only people with actual knowledge will comment on a topic.

      USD market, 3 largest exchanges combined, last 30 days: ~550 million USD

      EUR market, 3 largest exchanges combined, last 30 days: ~36 million EUR = 46 million USD

      Much smaller? Sure.

      "In the .01% range"? Try "in the 8 to 9% range".

      And I suspect it can only get bigger now ^__^

    106. Re:It's started... by pla · · Score: 1

      Grocery stores don't accept bitcoins.

      Actually...

    107. Re:It's started... by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      The government finally decided to care and used the one achilles heel of BitCoin...conversion to and from dollars. If BitCoin had some innate value, it wouldn't be a problem, but since it's primary use is as an exchange currency for dodging taxes and selling goods on the black market, this change is going to seriously impact the value of the currency.The government can't control BitCoin, but it can control US financial institutions and other companies that need to interact with those financial institutions.

      We'll now see how well the BitCoin market can operate as a completely stand-alone entity.

      Or we'll see bitcoin operators caving in to (assumed) US Govt demands for information (similar to the ongoing offshore banking battles)

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    108. Re:It's started... by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Well, one such example would be the oil-for-food program. Russia was by far the greatest abuser, but not the only one by any means. France is on that list as expected:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil-for-Food_Programme#Beneficiaries

      As are the US and UK

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    109. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold has innate value.
      It is used in electronics.
      The yahoo answer is actually wrong.
      If all humans died tomorrow then gold will still have an innate value. Its just there would be no humans to use it.
      In 10 million years when the next intelligent species evolves, they will thank the humans for giving them already mined gold that they can use for electronics or other purposes. In 10 million years, the next intelligent species will laugh at the US$ paper notes.
      Something has innate value because it is the only item that meets a specific requirement (well). Humans are actually optional.

    110. Re:It's started... by sphealey · · Score: 1

      - - - - - If you choose small Italian cars as your unit of currency, they can always be driven, (providing value) no matter how much you've devalued them. - - - - -

      You must have a special source of small Italian cars that aren't in the repair shop 360 days of the year.

      sPh

    111. Re:It's started... by pantaril · · Score: 1

      this change is going to seriously impact the value of the currency.

      Realy? When do you expect this impact will happen? The news was published yesterday and i don't see any unusual drop in exchange rate. What percentage of value will bitcoin lose?

    112. Re:It's started... by pla · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things (at least, for now and for a long time yet). Whole BTC economy is smaller than any of major corporations (and most of minor ones).

      The Bitcoin economy has a market cap of USD$1.2B, making it roughly the same size as a little Mom 'n Pop bookstore you might have heard of - Barnes & Noble?

    113. Re:It's started... by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

      An exception that proves the rule. Even with minor novelty vendors like bitmunchies, at some point there needs to be an interaction with a real economy. That is, with suppliers, with landlords, utilities companies, so on and so forth. At those points, for the business to continue existing, there needs to be the large scale conversion of bitcoins to USD, or whatever the local currency is. However you might be personally be about to avoid bitcoin conversion on the small scale, that's only the tip of the iceberg.

    114. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 times zero still equals zero.

      Bush sent soldiers to fight a war based on a lie. Obama lays the groundwork to shoot Americans with drones, with no due process and in direct violation of their constitutionally granted rights. They seem pretty equally bad to me.

    115. Re:It's started... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      This is the best reason to never impeach I've ever heard. Kind of like why no one took a shot at Bush - it would have left Darth Cheney in charge.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    116. Re:It's started... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      No, the other materials tend to corrode or react over time. Gold does not. It will be exactly the same in 100 years as it is today, no matter where you put it, unless it's raining aqua regia for some reason but then money is the least of your worries.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    117. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who the hell cares?

    118. Re:It's started... by wikdwarlock · · Score: 2

      I imagine some of it has to do with Quantum Electro Dynamics, and the fact that the electron arrangement in gold makes it naturally a very different color under white light than most other metals. Ancient people found a rock that had a color like no other rocks, and also could be shaped into trinkets. That's my best guess for how it all got started.

      --

      "I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer." -Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear
    119. Re:It's started... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      As a currency, however, gold and silver have always required a state actor (i.e. "fiat") to guarantee metal content

      Not really. They required assaying. That has sometimes been performed by private parties, notably in the American Old West.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    120. Re:It's started... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      The voted-best answer is a shit answer. Any answer that complains about something assuming anthropocentricism is a bad answer if it comes from a human. Of fucking course "intrinsic" value means "intrinsic value to humans", what did he think it meant, intrinsic value to algae? Or perhaps meerkats?

      Gold has intrinsic value to humans (two words which I will henceforth omit because anyone who is not a complete asshole understands them to be assumed) because it has unusual properties and you can make it into stuff. Paper money has only the intrinsic value of paper, and paper which has already been written on, to boot. Electronic money is the only kind of money with absolutely no intrinsic value — indeed, its intrinsic value is negative because there are costs to maintaining it, whereas paper money in a plastic bag or a bar of gold or silver can reasonably be expected to outlast its owner.

      With that said, the price of gold has been manipulated upwards to the point that if you buy gold today, you have to acquire it at something vastly above its intrinsic value. This does not differentiate it from paper money, so they do have a lot in common.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    121. Re:It's started... by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Suspicious activity in this case will mean buying drugs on Silk Road. They are under pressure to "shut it down". They can't obviously because it is on Tor, but they can try to stop drug buyers from buying bitcoins with dollars, and drug sellers from selling bitcoins for dollars.

    122. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't use BitCoin because of its value in dollars, and neither, I suspect, do most of its (non-speculating) users.

      All three of them?

    123. Re:It's started... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      So you've set an arbitrary point of rarity ("as rare as gold") and said that any metal that doesnt meet that isnt as good. The problem is that diamonds, sapphires, rubies, silver, titanium, aluminum, platinum, all could meet a lot of the qualities you mention.

      I didnt listen to the podcast because Ive heard it before, and the argument seems to boil down to "gold is great because its the only metal with the exact same qualities as gold". There are a lot of other really great substances that we could have chosen, and the industrial qualities of gold really cannot be used to explain why gold is popular. Historically, its probably a stretch to say that people chose gold because of its resistance to acids or that it lasts for hundreds of years without tarnishing-- historical peoples were happy to use coins which tarnished, and various cultures prized shells over gold.

      Gold just happens to have "made it", and it happens to be a pretty decent metal, but theres no reason that aluminum for example couldnt have been the currency metal.

    124. Re:It's started... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Thats probably a better answer than most that have been given, although lead probably meets that requirement as well.

    125. Re:It's started... by cellurl · · Score: 1

      I am a charity. If I do less than US$40k/yr, I am left alone. I plan on using bitcoin for all my transactions as soon as possible. It makes donating cheaper, easier. Its just what I have been wanting. Its like mana from heaven. I will keep a log, but the proof is on the government, not me.

      But if I had one prediction for bitcoin, it will cause 2 things, a) everything will move offshore, a) a second-tier internet will emerge, people wanting to use it offshore.

      Help eliminate stupid speeding tickets

    126. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason you listed for preferring bitcoins was for small, international movements of money. What good is that money if that's the only transaction it's good for? That is to say, how valuable is that transaction over non-bitcoin movements of money internationally if you don't exchange back to the local currency? And couldn't the "normal standard daily swings" negate any savings over non-bitcoin movements?

    127. Re:It's started... by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      It's a good conductor of electricity and heat

      As is copper.

      It's easy to work with

      As is lead, zinc, copper, etc.

      It's non-toxic.

      To the extent that most metals are (silver, copper etc), and in small doses, yes.

      It plays nice with other elements.

      Gold, the friendly element.

      Its very "non-reactive" only certian acids will dissolve it.

      True, though others are close.

      It's used in industry, electronics, food and medicine.

      So are silver, copper, iron, silicon, etc...

      Depending on what you are doing, Gold might have some advantages against other metals or elements, but it is not essential to our civilisation - most uses could easily be replaced by another metal or alloy (like silver for example); it is widely used but not essential to most processes. So the use-value of Gold is pretty low - definitely worth something, but definitely not the most precious metal to industry compared to say silicon or iron, and useful in decorative arts but again not essential.

      The spot price of gold is almost entirely defined by speculation based on its status as a 'precious' metal, valued for jewellery and as a store of value, and that is based on nothing more tangible than a belief that it is a good store of value. A belief belied by the wildly fluctuating price of gold over the last 100 years.

    128. Re:It's started... by fredprado · · Score: 1

      Bits in your bank account cannot.

    129. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real genius argument there.

      "Your socialist president is a murdering tyrant"

      "But but but a Republican would be much worse"

      Fucking moron. Republicans fail at being conservatives and protecting individual liberties, but they do better at protecting them than socialists. And what we need is a conservative, not a Republican. But yeah, whatever you say.

    130. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard? Online poker is on its way back but now the government gets its cut by licensing and taxing it which was what the ban on offshore online poker companies was all about...

      You make is sound like unregulated gambling was a good thing. Only an idiot would bet at an unregulated house.

    131. Re:It's started... by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Well, you're forgetting a couple of heads such as the DIA and the NRO, and (I suppose) the NGA, but actually I apologise for the insinuation—I consider it obvious that the DHS doesn't count simply because they get so much bad publicity. I generally agree with your description of them, although I think you give them too much credit. As far as enforcement goes, their job is done when The Bad Things are screwed up; their masters don't care if the job is clean or not.

      Curtailing their activity would mean calming the sabre-rattlers at those agencies and within the executive branch, though, so don't hold your breath. It's not easy to convince bureaucratic careerists haunted by failure that their face-saving actions are immoral. In fact, that may be the hardest thing in the universe. You generally have to wait for them to die off and be replaced with people who have more relativist outlooks—and if Gorbachev's career in the Soviet Union is any indicator, that'll probably be another sixty years or so. Perhaps most tragic is that these people will never stand trial for what they have done to the world.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    132. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if Biden were impeached next, Nancy Pelosi would become president.

      Oh, the *delicious* irony... ("Wait, WTF?!? We just made Nancy PELOSI the President by impeaching Obama and Biden? No! No! Fox News and Rush made it sound like if we could impeach them, Rand Paul and Sarah Palin would float down from the heavens on golden wings to save us from... er... bad things...")

    133. Re:It's started... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Well, that's the thing. It's not rare. It's only perceived to be rare. But that's a perception that came about as a result of human value placed upon its intrinsic properties.

      In fact, a big reason why it's been the de facto currency all the world over is due to its plentifulness. The other big reason is because it's easy to work with, and the final (slightly lesser) reason is because it does not oxidize.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    134. Re:It's started... by coinreturn · · Score: 2

      As true as that maybe but i feel that it has to due with the fact he is black. Think about it how would it look if the 1st black president (even if elected twice) was impeached? The anti-racist crowd would eat it up quicker then a fat kid with an all you can eat pass at a candy store.

      Oh gimme a break! He hasn't been impeached because he hasn't done anything to deserve impeachment, the constant streams of lies from right-wing nutjobs notwithstanding. Not liking a guy is not a reason to impeach.

    135. Re:It's started... by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      And if Biden were impeached next, Nancy Pelosi would become president.

      Oh, the *delicious* irony... ("Wait, WTF?!? We just made Nancy PELOSI the President by impeaching Obama and Biden? No! No! Fox News and Rush made it sound like if we could impeach them, Rand Paul and Sarah Palin would float down from the heavens on golden wings to save us from... er... bad things...")

      Wow, how wrong can you be? First, Biden would bring in a new VP (that's what Ford did, remember?) Second, Pelosi is no longer speaker of the House.

    136. Re:It's started... by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      Gold has some innate value in the sense that it can be used directly to build stuff. It is just a much lesser value than its current market value at the moment. Fiat currencies have absolute no innate value.

      Wrong. You can use any paper currency as insulation, wallpaper, clothing, shims, sweat rags, among numerous other things.

    137. Re:It's started... by mindwhip · · Score: 3, Informative

      You make is sound like unregulated gambling was a good thing. Only an idiot would bet at an unregulated house.

      While not all, a good number of the offshore houses WERE regulated in their respective countries. It was just the US government not liking that others were getting a slice of pie and they were going hungry.

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    138. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dollar has the innate value of allowing you to live in the US. Part of living in the US is paying taxes and taxes cannot be paid in any other currency.

    139. Re:It's started... by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

      Rubbish. I am far from a bitcoin cheerleader, but i can't imagine that this is the government firing an opening salvo at bitcoin.

      Why would they cut off only Dwolla, but leave Mt.Gox standing? US clients can still wire funds to and from Gox, and can transfer their bitcoin balances anywhere they choose.

      Why wouldn't they call in a favor from Japan and raid Mt.Gox's offices there and shutdown their computers - that would freeze all of the money that Gox is holding AND freeze all of their clients Bitcoin balances? Think about what the gov't did to Kim Dotcom and attempts with the Pirate Bay.

      Why would the lead be taken by the DHS rather than the Treasury or Office of Controlled Foreign Assets?

      Why would they leave the mt.gox domain name operating as normal? They pull domains that are linked to illegal activity at the snap of a finger, why leave Mt.Gox up and running?

      And why go after Mt.Gox first - I mean, yes, they're the biggest, but with a few swieps of the pen, the government could shutdown every bitcoin exchange and transmitter in the US. It would take just about no effort to accomplish that, and then they could focus on the big fish.

      And would they really need to go through that effort? they've got the NSA - i'm certain that those fellows could direct enough resources at the bitcoin network that they could overtake the collective hashing power that the network now has. Maybe not immediately, but in a relatively short period of time. All they would have to do is broadcast they they now have the majority of the hashing power, and there goes all confidence in Bitcoin. Who would tie up any capital in there at all if they know that any single entity could suddenly decide to start overwriting transactions and generally causing all sorts of havoc to the network?

      So no. As much as I don't think bitcoins have a long-term future, or even a medium term one, this isn't an opening shot of a bigger war.

    140. Re:It's started... by fredprado · · Score: 1

      You could, but nobody would because it is cheaper to use non money paper even if the money didn't have its added value given by law. But then again most money is bits in bank accounts, paper money isn't going to last long.

    141. Re:It's started... by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      You could, but nobody would because it is cheaper to use non money paper even if the money didn't have its added value given by law. But then again most money is bits in bank accounts, paper money isn't going to last long.

      I didn't say it was a useful idea, only that it could be done. Much like gold has overinflated value compared to intrinsic value, so does paper. Paper does have some intrinsic value.

    142. Re:It's started... by fredprado · · Score: 1

      Well, when the intrinsic value of something is lower than its cost to extract or produce it has for any practical effect no value and money paper net value is negative.

    143. Re:It's started... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Sure, you can list a bunch of elements that fit each of those properties, but not many fit all of them. Copper comes close, but its quite reactive and oxidises in air - hence that green copper oxide coated statue in New York.

      By "plays nice" I mean its very easy to alloy it with many other metals.

    144. Re:It's started... by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      Well, when the intrinsic value of something is lower than its cost to extract or produce it has for any practical effect no value and money paper net value is negative.

      Much like gold to you or me. If you wanted to buy some gold for intrinsic purposes (such as making a non-corrodable connector), you'd have to buy it at street cost, which is much more due to everyone thinking shiny metals are great.

    145. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep I think you are right. Now the question is why do humans give gold so much value?
      It's because all of the properties mentioned before, plus the fact that most people on earth think it's valuable (they will give you goods for it anywhere) and plus the fact that it's shiny and beautiful.. no really! I think that superficial feature makes us awe at gold more than silver and other precious metals.

    146. Re:It's started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    147. Re:It's started... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      To be fair, I wouldn't mind storing my wealth in diamonds and rubies and silver, either. The problem with the stones is that the price is artificially kept high. The mark-up on jewelry is ridiculous. And of course diamond mining is an effective monopoly. So you pay what DeBeers wants you to pay - which is too much. But short of them dumping loads of diamonds and flooding the market, diamonds could be a fair way to store wealth as well. The problem with diamonds though is you either get a whole diamond or you don't. Gold can be cut up, shaved, powdered, and a precise weight handed over. Silver and aluminum are far too common. Although silver has also been a store of wealth, its value is always less than gold. And platinum is just too rare.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    148. Re:It's started... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      171,000 tonnes. Worldwide. Since we started mining gold. I'd say that's pretty rare, especially considering how dense gold is you don't need many m3 to reach that mass. That's only around 9000 cubic meters.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    149. Re:It's started... by Meski · · Score: 1

      If you pay taxes on winnings, can you use losses as a deduction?

    150. Re: It's started... by Meski · · Score: 1

      Sooner be playing it live. Online seems ... boring, kind of like gaming machines.

    151. Re:It's started... by Meski · · Score: 1

      Susan's still busily selling gold in /2 on Wow. I suppose that means "she's" succeeding, with some players, despite it being against TOS.

    152. Re:It's started... by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      Way to skip over half the formula. The availability of goods for purchase in gold cannot be a sufficient condition for the use of gold as a currency - it's a circular argument. Demand for the currency must be created somewhere, via a levy of taxes.

      Gold was valuable in the Old West because it was valuable in the East, where it was valuable because the government was collecting taxes while operating its gold-convertible currency.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    153. Re:It's started... by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      It's a great book, unfortunately quite expensive ($55 on Amazon). It's "possible" there is a PDF floating around online...

      I haven't read much about private mints in other time periods, but in the Middle Ages the "private" mints (i.e. the free mints) were nevertheless operated by churchmen, feudal lords or vassals of feudal lords. Each of these had military power as well as license and ability to collect taxes. Also at that time, the ability to assay gold was much less common than in the classical period or Renaissance.

      Another interesting aspect to the reemergence of coin in Europe is the collapse of currencies after their issuing mints were taken over by immunists, lords or wealthy individuals who obtained immunity to royal taxation and often royal justice as well. It seems that the people were unwilling to trust the metal content of such coins, which is borne out by the adulterated coins they seem to have issued.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    154. Re:It's started... by jwdb · · Score: 1

      Bits in your bank account cannot.

      Use the bits as a one-time pad.
      Rearrange them to build software.
      If there's patterns, treat them as a black and white light interference pattern and see what kind of images show up.
      Pipe them to /dev/dsp and take a nap surrounded by pink noise, or maybe even turn them into music (they did it with radioactive decay).

      C'mon, be a bit more creative.

    155. Re:It's started... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      In particular, any movement of small amounts of money (in the $100 range) between countries typically takes upwards of 50% of the total in various fees (and that assumes 1st-world countries with more-or-less legitimate banking and postal systems on both ends of the transaction).

      If I as a brit receive a commercial paypal payment in dollars from an american and choose to convert it to pounds (I also have the option of keeping it in dollars) I will pay a 3.4% +20p transaction fee, a 0.5% cross-border fee, a 2.5% currency conversion fee. A total of arround 6.5%. Fees for international credit card transactions are comparable

      Yes some banks charge stupid fees for small international transactions but that just means avoiding using those banks for small international transfers, not avoiding the whole regular financial system.

      The biggest extra cost with buying stuff internationally vs buying stuff domestically in my experiance has been the delivery charges from the supplier and customs fees from the carriers, not the costs of making the payment.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    156. Re:It's started... by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Platinum is the second most appropriate metal for value storage, according to the podcast. The characteristics that make it less good than gold are that it is more rare, perhaps too rare to be a useful currency; that it has a melting point too high for pre-industrial societies to make use of it; and that it looks too much like other non-precious metals, whereas gold is "obviously" gold.

    157. Re:It's started... by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Carve out twenty minutes to listen to it again. They specifically address your points, such as whether gold "just made it" or whether it was "destined to make it as the only good choice". They come down on the latter conclusion.

      Diamonds aren't malleable nor (easily) divisible nor can they be recombined.

      There are lots and lots of characteristics that make a good commodity store of value. Gold has a heck of a lot of them, not just one or two.

      No, there are not a lot of other really great substances we could have chosen.

      But you are right about one thing, we didn't choose gold for the industrial properties, unless you count the making of jewelry.

    158. Re:It's started... by Myopic · · Score: 1

      I got a Flamebait for that comment? That's a bullshit mod right there.

    159. Re:It's started... by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Only against future gambling winnings. And I'm not sure how it crosses over years, I've never lost enough in 1 year to have to care.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    160. Re:It's started... by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      You're saying a president authorizing the killing of American citizens without due process isn't deserving of impeachment. Please defend that position, and be sure to consider how you'd feel if you or a family member were the target of such a killing, along with consideration of the consequences for the foundations of what we consider the core of our nation's principles of justice. Let's see if you can just address the issue straight, without any attempt at bringing up other politicians to deflect attention from it. I doubt you'll be able to.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    161. Re:It's started... by coinreturn · · Score: 2

      You're saying a president authorizing the killing of American citizens without due process isn't deserving of impeachment. Please defend that position, and be sure to consider how you'd feel if you or a family member were the target of such a killing, along with consideration of the consequences for the foundations of what we consider the core of our nation's principles of justice. Let's see if you can just address the issue straight, without any attempt at bringing up other politicians to deflect attention from it. I doubt you'll be able to.

      I'm not saying it's right, I'm just saying it's legal. Look "here."

      You just don't like the other guy using this same power you gave the previous one.

    162. Re:It's started... by alexo · · Score: 1

      Remember the online poker craze? It basically died without access to the USD.

      The corpse looks surprisingly active.

    163. Re:It's started... by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      No, it's not legal, and AUMF doesn't even apply to this case, regardless of what Eric Holder would like to believe. It's both illegal and horribly wrong, no matter who's doing it. Your willingness to accept such behavior from the president of our nation absolutely disgusts me, and you handily failed the test of whether you could keep yourself from mentioning other politicians with your last sentence. You simply could not maintain focus on the actual issue, and instead attempted to put words in my mouth implying I agreed with the behavior of our last president. Not that it matters, but that's pretty far from the truth.

      In short, you're a partisan fool with the depth of a kiddie pool, so fuck off.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    164. Re:It's started... by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      No, you FUCK OFF. I did not fail your childish game. AUMF specifically authorizes the president to use "whatever force is necessary" to fight terrorism. It was a stupid law, but it has not been challenged successfully, so it remains law. I'm guessing that YANAL, so obviously the Justice Dept's ruling overrides your petty internet degree. So, I mentioned that the previous president also used this law, that WAS NOT a justification. Just pointing out that you are a partisan hypocrite.

    165. Re:It's started... by trout007 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it was an evolution. It all started as barter and some common items became the first money. Then all of the things that make bad money made the others fall away and we were left with metals.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    166. Re:It's started... by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      You're right, I'm not a lawyer. Oddly enough, however, I happen to have been party to face to face conversations with more than one assembly of attorneys discussing this very matter, and the consensus was strongly that the actions we're discussing are in fact illegal. Perhaps you haven't heard of the Due Process Clause; the actions under discussion absolutely represent arbitrary denial of the right to life and liberty.

      This hasn't been challenged successfully because our political climate, which you're apparently in the habit of aggressively condoning, makes such a challenge prohibitively difficult at present. Justice Department rulings are also immensely different from court rulings as well, but if you think for one moment our courts are immune to the influence of the administration, you're a bigger fool than I thought. The shit Holder has managed to get away with is appalling in its breadth, rivaled perhaps only by some of his predecessors in terms of mass infringement upon civil liberties (Patriot Act, creation of the TSA, etc). I suppose that's okay with you, though, since you aren't directly impacted by it in ways resembling a cruise missile converting your body into red mist. More on that in a bit.

      I vehemently opposed many of Bush's policies, as I oppose many of Obama's. Hell, I didn't even vote for Bush in his second term, realizing fully that I had screwed up the first time. I also served this nation in the military; I suspect your closest recent contact with an armed services uniform would probably have been in a thrift store.

      As far as childish games go, you're the one playing them, straight from the start. You simply cannot discuss a matter like an adult and deal with it straight without polluting the discourse with tired old cliches about what some other guy did, or by casting aspersions on someone's views via implied affiliation with an opposing political faction. That makes you a fucking dumbass, and you're an outright coward for lacking the spine to stand up and oppose actions which directly contravene the principles we as a nation are supposed to hold so dear. So, in sum, fuck off again.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    167. Re:It's started... by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      Troll, as you well know, you are the childish game player. I started by saying that Obama had not committed an impeachable offense - and he has not. I point to the reason and you respond with a well-thought out "fuck you," while accusing me of polluting the discourse. Look in the mirror, asshole!

      I've looked over your posting history and you are apparently a fossil-fuel apologist who denies global warming who only pulls Linus' shit-stained cock out of his mouth long enough to shout "FUCK YOU" at everyone who disagrees with you, especially concerning your beloved bitcoins.

      You think you're an expert on everything, saying you've been programming since 1988, yet are only 32. Newsflash: your playing with logo when you were 7 years old is not something to put on your resume, sonny boy.

      Shave your neckbeard and move out of your mother's basement, dumbfuck with strong, but uninformed, opinions.

    168. Re:It's started... by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      Credit (formalized debt) actually predates commodity currencies and government money, though without a common unit of account, credit is just deferred barter.

      Interestingly, non-metal currencies were used in the ancient world and early Middle Ages (e.g. squares of intricate cloth in Prague). My sense is that people had already learned the value of a common unit of account - and the necessity of seniorage - so they realized they could use these "pure fiat" currencies after gold disappeared in the wake of the fall of the Western Empire. It must have seemed a natural fusion of their traditional formal/informal debt systems with the common unit of account formerly provided by the Roman solidus.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    169. Re:It's started... by AnOfferYouCantRefuse · · Score: 0

      Mmmmmmmmm! What a rancid asshole you have! I'm tempted to just shove my foul cock right into it and smooch your feces-covered bowels! What say you?

    170. Re:It's started... by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      Troll, as you well know, you are the childish game player. I started by saying that Obama had not committed an impeachable offense - and he has not. I point to the reason and you respond with a well-thought out "fuck you," while accusing me of polluting the discourse. Look in the mirror, asshole!

      The extrajudicial killing of an American citizen is absolutely an impeachable offense. I don't care if you don't like that, it doesn't change reality. Reference previous notes regarding our political climate for why nothing is likely to be done about it in the near future. Republicans are just as much to blame for this as any Democrat.

      I've looked over your posting history and you are apparently a fossil-fuel apologist who denies global warming who only pulls Linus' shit-stained cock out of his mouth long enough to shout "FUCK YOU" at everyone who disagrees with you, especially concerning your beloved bitcoins.

      That's hilarious. First off, Big Oil is a big problem. The practice (and it is very real) of essentially handing petroleum interests billions of USD worth of tax breaks/incentives/whatever-people-want-to-call-it-these-days is phenomenally poor policy. Second, global warming is a fact. I've never said it isn't, merely asked people running around screaming about whatever the flavor of the week pulp media talking heads are spouting off about to slow down and examine all available sources of information before adopting alarmist positions concerning outcomes and what's needed over say the next decade. That's a pretty far cry from being a global warming denier. I'd also be delighted if people would spend a little more time talking about kids starving under bridges instead of cozying up to debates on things they somehow find easier to talk about. I suppose you'd have to have reading comprehension skills to understand this, though. By the way, what's your carbon footprint, big guy?

      Bitcoin, along with other novel developments in cryptocurrencies, is an interesting thing to think about and play with. I certainly do. I also care about other currencies, namely several examples that are by definition fiat. Again, you're probably just skimming some text and thinking "oh boy, I bet I can use this against him!" It didn't work out for you.

      You think you're an expert on everything, saying you've been programming since 1988, yet are only 32. Newsflash: your playing with logo when you were 7 years old is not something to put on your resume, sonny boy.

      Actually, my favorite language as a kid was C. Naturally, I played around with various BASIC dialects as well, but even with those there were things you simply couldn't do without what amounted to ASM routines expressed in hex, so I had to deal with that as well. It's amazing what kids can do when their parents don't artificially limit them. Speaking of kids...

      Shave your neckbeard and move out of your mother's basement, dumbfuck with strong, but uninformed, opinions.

      I moved out of my dad's house at 17. We couldn't get along back then, partially due to some older family history and partially due to problems between my stepmother and I at the time. Long story short, I've been working since then, and took my first professional programming position in Atlanta doing telecommunications coding for the platforms that drove VRU/IVR systems for BofA, SunTrust, etc when I was 18. It paid about 70K at the time. You're correct that I'm 32 now, and I'm happily married with a couple of beautiful kids. My total personal income is six figures, which permits my wife to stay at home with our children without us having to worry about money, which is nice. Incidentally, my military service was in the Navy, where I decided to walk away from a nice paying IT career and cut my income by about 60% in my mid twenties to serve my nation. What would you know about that?

      For that matter, and I guess this goes back to the earlier points rega

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    171. Re:It's started... by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      That is probably the least irrational post you've made so far. The problem I had with you from the beginning was that you leap so fast to name-calling and cursing, so I returned likewise. Your basic problem is that anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot in your eyes. You can't see someone else's view. This is compounded by your belief that you are an expert in everything. Yes, we went horribly off-topic, but your single-mindedness is not something I want to have filling my inbox. Have a nice day.

    172. Re:It's started... by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      You know what? I've got my convictions for sure, but to hell with the original disagreement. I've been up all night watching over my youngest daughter; she spiked a 103F fever about 12 hours ago out of nowhere, and I rushed her to the ER with my wife as soon as she called me at the office. Your last comment hits home with me in terms of examining where I can do better on some things, and I apologize for my original profanity. Email sometime if you like.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    173. Re:It's started... by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      Sorry to hear about your daughter. I hope all turns out okay.

    174. Re:It's started... by fredprado · · Score: 1

      Not at all if I could still sell the product at a profit, as all motherboard and cellphone manufacturers do, for example.

  2. Bound to happen. by gbkersey · · Score: 1

    Control of currency makes control of people easier....

    1. Re:Bound to happen. by hedwards · · Score: 2

      Not really, in the US we have the USD because prior to that there was an ad hoc system of state currencies and there was nobody in charge of managing it or deciding what was and wasn't acceptable as a form of payment.

      As much as I loathe and despise the Federal Reserve, the current still better than having random people creating currency which may or may not be usable next month. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USD#History

    2. Re:Bound to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be joking. Competing currencies would be a lot better than the current theft through inflation carried out by the US government.

    3. Re:Bound to happen. by adolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You must be joking. Competing currencies would be a lot better than the current theft through inflation carried out by the US government.

      You mean "theft through inflation carried out by the Federal Reserve Bank."

      (Pro-Tip: The Federal Reserve, despite its name, is not a government entity.)

    4. Re:Bound to happen. by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      Good one. By any reasonable measure there has been massive deflation since the beginning of the industrial revolution.

      Sure, there has been some apparent inflation driven by food, energy and fraudulent bubble markets. But how much cheaper today than in the past is a computer? Antibiotics? Rapid transportation? Instantaneous communication? Access to knowledge? These had infinite prices not too long ago.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    5. Re:Bound to happen. by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      Uh, yes it is. The Fed is authorized to exist by Congress. The Federal Reserve act gives the Treasury Secretary power over the Fed chairman should they disagree, and indeed the chair is appointed by the President of the United States.

      To be sure, the private banking sector has a significant role in running the Fed, which I believe should be reduced or eliminated entirely. But if you think Bernanke is working only for their interests, you haven't been reading the screeds against him coming precisely from the leaders of that sector.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    6. Re:Bound to happen. by adolf · · Score: 1

      There are many private businesses that are authorized to exist by Congress.

      ???

      -adolf

    7. Re:Bound to happen. by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      (Pro-Tip: The Federal Reserve, despite its name, is not a government entity.)

      - then show us one time (1) in the last 20 years when the Fed refused to monetise government debt please.

    8. Re:Bound to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forced inflation leads to lower real wages and actually higher prices. E.g. Ice Creams where I live (southern european country) have in the last 20 years increased by more than 200%, as have most goods that have not suffered a spectacular increase in competition and production efficiency (like computers).

      History shows that deflation is only a bad sign if the underlying cause is a real loss in purchasing power, not an increase in production efficency, but well the likes of Krugman like to spit on history.

    9. Re:Bound to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deflation is theft, hoarders of money would be stealing gains due to expanse of the economy by doing nothing. I don't like the idea of people being enriched for doing nothing with their money while people actually expanding the GDP get nothing except higher costs to obtain currency. The economy is not static, and the money supply should not be either. Wealth is not a zero-sum game.

    10. Re:Bound to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the USPS right?

    11. Re:Bound to happen. by adolf · · Score: 1

      Strawman.

    12. Re:Bound to happen. by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Strawman; maybe. I'd call it a statement of one possible way to show the FED is politically independent. The fact is he is right. The FED chair is appointed by the President. Fed board members want to be able to move into administration jobs, or lobbying or vice verse via Washington's revolving door system.

      There is basically no evidence to suggest the FED remains an apolitical care taker if it ever was.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    13. Re:Bound to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An institution with the sole right to print money, whose head is nominated by the president, is a government entity, regardless of its nominal legal status.

    14. Re:Bound to happen. by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      The Fed was created by Congress. It also turns over its "profits", including interest payments on US debt, directly to the Treasury General Account (quotes because the Fed has unlimited power to issue currency).

      I don't think there is really any comparison between the Fed and a truly private enterprise. Sure, the private banking system has a hand in running things, but is clear from the Federal Reserve Act that the executive branch has final say over the Fed's action.

      It's fair to describe the Fed as a public-private partnership, but the Fed is not really a profitable enterprise, since all its profits are monies it creates electronically and credits to its own accounts. Furthermore, it lacks the defining element of a private operation, which is the inability to create money, in turn leading to an operational constraint in which money must be obtained prior to being spent. In contrast, the government / Fed must issue money before it can be collected back from the public.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
  3. Any bets on whether its a tax issue? by LordLimecat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A warrant from the district court of Maryland, does anyone know whether thats likely to be a state tax issue? If it were truly a federal concern, youd think the warrant would come from a federal court....

    Can any lawyers comment?

    1. Re:Any bets on whether its a tax issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Would DHS be involved then? I'd bet on money laundering.

    2. Re:Any bets on whether its a tax issue? by hedwards · · Score: 2

      If it's a tax issue then DHS wouldn't likely be involved. That would likely be the IRS or DoJ, because anything that's likely to violate state tax laws is probably also going to violate federal tax laws as well. Most likely it would be people hiding taxable income.

      DHS would probably be involved because there's money being sent into and out of the country without it being properly reported to customs. ICE itself being a part of the DHS these days.

    3. Re:Any bets on whether its a tax issue? by gatfirls · · Score: 1

      You're probably right but DHS has their fingers in *everything* because, ya know, it's all part of the wildly ambiguous term "homeland security".

    4. Re:Any bets on whether its a tax issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Entirely possible this is primarily a tax issue. It has been said countless times that BitCoin is the enemy of the government (any government) because they don't have a way to tax it currently. All they have to do to kill it is set up a 20% tax for converting to/from their own currency.

  4. See! It it's not just a waste of tax payer money. by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Funny

    In fact, I think we need a new Department: DERP - Department of Earnings from Role Playing. Then we can finally shut down the other online currencies like WoW Gold that threaten the almighty buck!

  5. OT by lesincompetent · · Score: 1

    blingtables -A INPUT -s mtgox -j REJECT
    blingtables -A OUTPUT -d mtgox -j REJECT
    I have issues.

    1. Re:OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please, I set my machines to DROP anything inbound on port 22.

      You want to try logging in?! Sit there and wait for the timeout!

  6. Re:See! It it's not just a waste of tax payer mone by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

    they can have half my gold from killing goblins as long as i dont have to share the rest of the loot.

    --
    ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  7. Market manipulation. by tocs · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think maybe some one from DHS wanted to generate some bad publicity for bitcoins. Now they can buy some and make a little money.

    1. Re:Market manipulation. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Well, why shouldn't they? It's not like BTC aren't already being exploited by pump and dump con artists.

    2. Re:Market manipulation. by lucm · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think maybe some one from DHS wanted to generate some bad publicity for bitcoins. Now they can buy some and make a little money.

      If your explanation for this situation was part of a list of 50 explanations where the 49 others are redacted and I had to gamble every dollar I have, I would definitely pick at random one of the other 49.

      Yes, that's how bad I think your explanation is. It's like a bad plot for a Steven Seagal movie except instead of being a former Special Ops operative trying to save an orphan from a ukrainian pedophile ring he would be the owner of an indian-friendly BitCoin exchange that throws a fit when he finds out that a retarded intern at the DHS has added the name of his exchange to the no-fly list in order to damage his business and make money. The movie would end with no explanation as to how exactly the retarded intern was planning to make money with this scheme because even while they were high the writers could not find an explanation that would make sense to their undemanding audience.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    3. Re:Market manipulation. by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Just to say that's the funniest post I've ever seen on /. - well done

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    4. Re:Market manipulation. by pantaril · · Score: 1

      Well, why shouldn't they? It's not like BTC aren't already being exploited by pump and dump con artists.

      If some people are acting immorally and doing pump and dump schemes (i'm not saying that it's true in the case of bitcoin), it's OK for another people or you to do the same?

      What a twisted way of thinking...

    5. Re:Market manipulation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Process for making a ton of money by GP's method:

      1) Short BC
      2) Shutdown a random BC exchange for a DHS investigation
      3) BC market panics
      4) Profit

      If you had put half the effort into considering what the GP wrote as you did into insulting him/her, you could have figured that out too.

    6. Re:Market manipulation. by lucm · · Score: 1

      Ok I'll call your BS on shorting BC.

      First of all to be able to short something you need a broker that will lend it to you. There is no broker out there that will lend bitcoins on signature, so IRL you'd need to provision a fairly high amount to cover your position. But let's stay in your fantasy world and suppose that because you are blowing the brokerage firm's CEO at will they lend you 10,000 bitcoins.

      So you go on the exchange and sell them at their market value of $100 each (of course in your fantasy world there are no brokerage or exchange fees, and there are always buyers lined up to pile on virtual currency). Then you give a call to your mole in the DHS and ask him to crack down on a random bitcoin exchange. The market falls and you buy back the bitcoins at $50 a piece (since all other people in the market are morons who will sell when the price is low), making a nice $500k profit after giving the bitcoins back to the broker. Wonderful.

      Of course there is the unlikely scenario that your DHS mole cannot deliver, or that the DHS is unable to shutdown a bitcoin exchange, or that the market will not react with a panic and wipe half the value of bitcoins. In that scenario, for each $1 increase in the value of bitcoin you will lose $10,000. Depending on how nervous the broker is, once the value reaches $110 he may very well knock on your door to recall the loan, at which point you have to not only give him the $1 million you made when you sold the borrowed bitcoins but also re-mortage your house to pay the extra $100k you owe him.

      See, when a scheme is described in more than simplistic bullet points it often loses its apparent cleverness.

      Anyone claiming to be able to perform market manipulation or use a government agency to trigger a series of predefined actions that will end up in making millions is either severly misinformed or outright stupid. There could be other explanations but they fall under the "diagnosis" category and legally require a medical degree so I'll leave them out.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  8. It's federal, not state by SteveFoerster · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm not a lawyer, but I used to work in a law library, and that's know enough to know that "U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland" is a federal court, not a state one.

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  9. Re:See! It it's not just a waste of tax payer mone by SteveFoerster · · Score: 5, Funny

    And if they use the revenue to fund military research, they could call it DERPA.

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  10. Could be looking at this all wrong. by shaitand · · Score: 2

    Contrary to what people have said Bitcoin has all the same government protection any other property does. This could be the DHS looking into the billion dollar attacks on gox as a form of terrorism/cyberthreat. They've just cut off the most likely way for the attackers to cash out.

    1. Re:Could be looking at this all wrong. by superwiz · · Score: 2

      Nope, that's not it. MtGox has daily withdrawl limits for this very reason.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  11. guess they already know by superwiz · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Obama administration knows that they'll be branded fascist after the last week's revelations. Guess they figured they might as well own it and spank the technology they don't like. They got nothing to lose reputation-wise at this point.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    1. Re:guess they already know by anagama · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, it is more correct to say that the Obama administration can be as GWB-like as it wants, and its reputation will remain amazingly high with Democrats. It's proof that Democrats didn't hate GWB's policies, they just hated GWB personally.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    2. Re:guess they already know by superwiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I had no love for Bush, but I think it's quite a smear to compare him to Obama. Bush's administration wiretapped suspected terrorists. They never sank so low as to wiretap reporters. And you'd have to reach back to Nixon to find an administration using IRS to target political opponents. I also don't recall Bush starting any wars without Congressional approval (albeit approval obtained under very, very questionable auspices).

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    3. Re:guess they already know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... They never sank so low as to wiretap reporters. ...

      Except that no wiretapping occurred. Records of calls to and from AP were obtained. Not the content of the calls themselves. This is completely legal under the Patriot Act. It is directly analogous to retrieving email headers (the 'to/from' and 'when') without retrieving the email message bodies. Which is also completely legal under the Patriot Act.

      Whether the Patriot Act is a little vague and far-reaching is a different question entirely.

    4. Re:guess they already know by geekoid · · Score: 1

      So tell me, do pubs just not have the ability to remember anything after the guy is out of office? It's like as soon as the term is up you people purge all negative data.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:guess they already know by arbulus · · Score: 2

      That is completely and totally wrong. The NSA has been wiretapping every single US citizen for the past decade. This is well known. And Bush started it. Obama is only making it bigger. Now the NSA has to build a new, gigantic data center out west to house all the data they're collecting.

    6. Re:guess they already know by anagama · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Love it -- hope you get a plus 5 insightful. That was a nice reworking of the "calling him an idiot is an insult to the wider idiot community" type quip.

      I totally agree that Obama has been worse than GWB but what is even more disturbing is how Democrats don't even want to know about it and have gone totally silent now that it is their guy doing the abuses.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    7. Re:guess they already know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, half-heartedly trying to close Guantanamo and giving up after being blocked by the opposing party is much, much worse than being the one to open Guantanamo. What a monster!

    8. Re:guess they already know by Teancum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is completely and totally wrong. The NSA has been wiretapping every single US citizen for the past decade. This is well known. And Bush started it. Obama is only making it bigger. Now the NSA has to build a new, gigantic data center out west to house all the data they're collecting.

      You can believe that one if you like.

      Do you honestly thing the government (choose whichever one you want) started to listen in just a decade ago? I got some real estate between Manhattan and Brooklyn to sell to you if you believe that one. At best, Bush Jr. only expanded earlier efforts that were well under way and expanded that to include scanning nearly every IP packet transmitted more than a couple hops.

      Nixon did plenty of wire tapping himself without warrants, and the technology wasn't even new with his administration. It might be pushing the envelope a bit to go back to the Hoover administration, but the FDR administration definitely kept tabs on communications between nearly all citizens when necessary. J. Edgar definitely collected his share of information about a great many ordinary citizens, and a fair bit by wiretapping too.

    9. Re:guess they already know by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Bush's administration wiretapped suspected terrorists.

      Did they? We'll never know, because Congress moved to shield the collaborators from any sort of legal action.

    10. Re:guess they already know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I voted for Obama because Mitt was a crazy person. Still pissed at both sides. Fuck them all.

    11. Re:guess they already know by rahvin112 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Up to the GWB administration wire tapping was a case by case basis, after 911 the Bush administration asked for direct links to all the telecom operators. ATT, Verizon and all the others provided direct fiber optic connections to their networks and funneled copies of everything going across their network directly to the government. This is the reason Congress was forced to give them immunity because if they didn't the class action suits would have sunk the phone companies. The need for immunity alone should point to just how serious of an expansion in wire taping occurred under the Bush administration.

      In fact as the previous poster said, it was those very links that caused the creation of the Data Center in Utah. I live in Utah and I can tell you that Data Center was already planned and sited in 2008 when Obama took office. The formerly 2-lane highway leading up to Camp Williams (where the data center is) was upgraded in 2008 in anticipation, new power lines were installed at the same time (the data center uses more power than the entire salt lake city valley). Though Obama has done nothing to stop this massive expansion of federal power it most certainly did start under Bush. And though I agree that the government's been spying on people for a long time, the passive acceptance of full monitoring of every single communication didn't start till after 9/11/2001. You are arguing that tapping a few phones here and there is no different than recording every single phone call/text/internet traffic going across the network. And there is a very big difference.

    12. Re:guess they already know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/when_the_irs_targeted_liberals/singleton/

    13. Re:guess they already know by anagama · · Score: 2

      I voted for Jill Stein and for my cat, because I won't cast a vote in favor of evil. Besides, the difference between Romney and Obama was literally, only skin deep.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    14. Re:guess they already know by Teancum · · Score: 2

      The telecommunications access points (usually at central offices) and forced engineering of telecom equipment standards that required ease of monitoring are things I remember happening in the Reagan administration and certainly were encouraged under Bill Clinton and Bush Sr. as well.

      I'm just saying dumping all of this on George W. Bush when there was ample evidence of this kind of thing happening well before he became president is uncalled for.... even though the "war on terrorism" did provide plenty of excuses to expand efforts that happened. It was by far more than just a few phone calls that were monitored on a case by case basis. All that really happened is that the U.S. federal government no longer even bothered to pretend that ordinary citizens had privacy on electronic communications.

      As for that Data Center in Utah County (well... part of it is in SL County).... I still shake my head even thinking about what it is that they are doing there.

      Strangely, one way that you can evade the government prying into your personal communications is through snail mail.... primarily because nobody bothers to use that any more.

    15. Re:guess they already know by superwiz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except that no wiretapping occurred.Records of calls to and from AP were obtained.

      This rises to the level of wiretapping. This information was enough to figure out who the reporters' sources were. Which is the only type of information which otherwise stays secret as a result of such a phone call. All news-worthy information contained in such phone calls gets published. Only the sources stay secret. So the content of the call actually is less secret than identities of the individuals making the call.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    16. Re:guess they already know by superwiz · · Score: 1

      There is only two types of people who would know this for sure: people working for this endeavor and people making money by supplying this endeavor. Neither one of those would be posting details on the Internet. This is my educated guess and I am sticking with it until proven otherwise. Some obvious questions: how do you know it's a data collection center rather than a data processing center? Processing requires more computational power than collection. The only way to answer the question of which one it is to know exactly what types of systems were deployed there. Building a data collection center is not mundane by today's standards. Just scroll up... you'll probably see an ad from some cloud operator at top of the page. Building a massive computing center is more likely done to build a unique capability (large processing capacity) rather than duplicate a commoditized capability (large storage facility).

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    17. Re:guess they already know by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 2

      Whether the Patriot Act is a little vague and far-reaching is a different question entirely.

      A little? I'd say it needs to be scrapped entirely.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    18. Re:guess they already know by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Bush's administration wiretapped suspected terrorists.

      Right... they only went after The Bad Guys.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    19. Re:guess they already know by cffrost · · Score: 1

      This is completely legal under the Patriot Act.

      That strikes me as a meaningless statement, tantamount to saying that an action is "completely legal within the confines of despotism."

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    20. Re:guess they already know by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      There is a certain contingent of narrow-minded partisan scumbags who make excuses for "their" guy and criticize the "other" guy no matter what. You pick on "repubs"(with some justification), but tell me there aren't an equal or greater number of people on "your" side who were intensely critical of the last admin but take a "hands off" policy toward this one for exactly the same policies? The glaring absence of the "peace" movement and peace demonstrations in the past 4 years is a good example.

    21. Re:guess they already know by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Bush expanded the powers of the state. Obama allowed the power of the state (entrusted in his hands) to be used to target his political enemies.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    22. Re:guess they already know by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Bush expanded the powers of the state.

      Which could have been, and probably was, abused many times in secret (similarly but not necessarily the same to how Obama used it, but it was to stop The Terrist Bogeyman).

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  12. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So the government just makes up the law as it goes along huh.

  13. money laundering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous money isn't supposed to exist in the US in a post-11-sept world. There's basically no way to legally act as an exchange for bitcoins, IANAL by any means, but my understanding is basically that these exchanges exist because no one has gone after them, not because they're overly legal. My *guess* here is that this is the first of many take-downs relating to bitcoin exchanges and anti-money laundering legislation.

    1. Re:money laundering... by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      I'd say Chuck Schumer was pissed off because when he ordered the DoJ to cease a certain domain name and related servers, they couldn't possibly oblige even if authorized to use nuclear weapons. That guy is known for getting verbally pissed off at anything he can't control.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    2. Re:money laundering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      nobody cares about your unconstitutional post-911 regulations. we'll use whatever technical means we can to circumvent them.

  14. I am sorry, you need to use English by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I think you're trying to write something in another language.

    Please check English in your browser for posting, and hit the refresh key.

    Thanks!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  15. Sci-Fi Supervillain by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't believe we've gone this many comment and nobody has mentioned that "Mutum Sigillium" sounds like the name of a inter-galactic criminal from Dimension X.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Sci-Fi Supervillain by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      That's because it sounds more like a nasal fungus.

    2. Re:Sci-Fi Supervillain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is Latin, and it means: Dumb Seal. Derive from this what you will =P

  16. Popcorn please! by gatfirls · · Score: 1

    Extra butter and the refillable size please. I'm gonna be here for a while.

  17. Re:Not really news by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've bought some pretty nice stuff with bitcoins that I've mined.

    Anyways, people like you are the suckers who will let the government do anything it chooses because the evil thing they do only targets ( kiddieporn | gambling | drugs ) so they should be allowed to do it as they please, because clearly only those people will be affected.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  18. Funny Money by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's no such thing as innate value. Value is context-dependent. All money is funny money. It's just a question of what brand of humor you prefer.

    The US Dollar is like Jay Leno. Dull and unimaginative, but shows up for work on time every night.

    Bitcoin is like Richard Pryor. Offensive, unstable, unpredictable, implicated in tax-evasion, and prone to setting itself on fire.

    1. Re:Funny Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Richard Pryor always had a point.

      I think that's where the whole comparison falls apart, personally.

    2. Re:Funny Money by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bitcoin is like Richard Pryor. Offensive, unstable, unpredictable, implicated in tax-evasion, and prone to setting itself on fire.

      And dead?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Funny Money by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as innate value. Value is context-dependent. All money is funny money. It's just a question of what brand of humor you prefer.

      So, basically you're saying it has inane value instead?

    4. Re:Funny Money by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 1

      Beautiful comparison.

    5. Re:Funny Money by pantaril · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as innate value. Value is context-dependent.

      This needs to be emphasized more. Large portion of comments under each bitcoin story endlessly contemplate about the innate value of various currencies, metals and comodities. It seems like very few people realy get it. Almost everything can have great value under right circumstances and under specific circumstances, things that are generally seen as valuable could be useless. Few examples:

      Flask of water has very little value under normal circumstances but could be a life saver when you are lost in the desert.
      Bag of dollars is usually percieved as valuable, but when you find yourself in space, riding rocket on your one-way road to mars, it's realy quite useless.

      You can also talk about various kinds of value. Marx proposed "use" value and "exchange" value. But i think those are just specific examples of context-dependent value described above.

    6. Re:Funny Money by AnOfferYouCantRefuse · · Score: 0

      My putrid cockhole will be the first one to give your rancid rectum a smooch, I swear it! What, you thought I'd pass up an opportunity to screw your foul asshole? Think again! You'd better fart out some cum after I'm done with your disgusting rectum, and it'd be nice if there were a few surprises in said cum, too... What say you?

  19. Mt. Gox does not appear to have registered ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    with FinCEN as required to here: http://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G001.html which is part of their anti-money laundering efforts; Or at least I can't find it in the search here: http://www.fincen.gov/financial_institutions/msb/msbstateselector.html

    If we consider some of the other issues already at play here, ie http://www.electronista.com/articles/13/05/07/facebook.square.dwolla.airbnb.mt.gox.hundreds.of.others.named/

    What becomes pretty obvious is that this is almost certainly related to the money laundering legislation, or rephrased: 'what you thought you could just violate the various laws in place for money exchanges because you did it with big hard to guess numbers?'

    RIP BITCOIN. It was a dumb idea full of hubris anyways.

    1. Re:Mt. Gox does not appear to have registered ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MtGox isn't based in the US.

  20. he's right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod parent up

  21. Where's the funny? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    There's no such thing as innate value. Value is context-dependent. All money is funny money. It's just a question of what brand of humor you prefer.

    The US Dollar is like Jay Leno. Dull and unimaginative, but shows up for work on time every night.

    Bitcoin is like Richard Pryor. Offensive, unstable, unpredictable, implicated in tax-evasion, and prone to setting itself on fire.

    So where does the "funny" bit come in for Bitcoin? Only I remember Richard Pryor actually making me laugh.

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:Where's the funny? by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as innate value. Value is context-dependent. All money is funny money. It's just a question of what brand of humor you prefer.

      The US Dollar is like Jay Leno. Dull and unimaginative, but shows up for work on time every night.

      Bitcoin is like Richard Pryor. Offensive, unstable, unpredictable, implicated in tax-evasion, and prone to setting itself on fire.

      So where does the "funny" bit come in for Bitcoin? Only I remember Richard Pryor actually making me laugh.

      Cheers,

      The "funny" is reading all the bitcoin nutjobs go crazy trying to justify it as legitimate currency and putting down central banks.

    2. Re:Where's the funny? by baka_toroi · · Score: 1

      Haven't you seen all those speculators laughing all the way to the bank during the last Bitcoin bubble?

  22. Is this really a surprise? by sirwired · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The likelihood that Mt Gox was complying with the "Know Your Customer" anti-money-laundering rules that apply to all financial institutions that handle currency was approx. zero. I'm not surprised in the least. If a bank was doing what Mt. Gox was, (as in, not even pretending to comply with the law), the same thing would happen.

    (That's not to say that disobedience of money laundering never occurs, just that experienced banks are substantially better at hiding it.)

    1. Re:Is this really a surprise? by fonos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I used Dwolla to fund my Mt. Gox account and vis-versa before the shutdown. At first you didn't need any ID, then you needed to upload a copy of your passport/driver's license and also something that verified your address (Bill). Then Dwolla itself started requiring my passport copy. Is there anything else really required?

    2. Re:Is this really a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know there are for transactions greater than $600 (or for multiple transactions just under by people trying to avoid the reporting requirement). I used to work at a bank, and everyone had to take the training, despite it being irrelevant to our jobs (everyone in my building anyway). I don't remember the specifics.

    3. Re:Is this really a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually mtgox is fully compliant with AML know your customer laws:
      https://support.mtgox.com/entries/20920158-AML-Policies

    4. Re:Is this really a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... just that experienced banks are substantially better at hiding it ...

      This very issue came up on Slashdot a few days ago. "Rolling stones" magazine has the story about the latest corruption in banks. Essentially "Too big to fail" also means "Too big to jail", which is the new scandal.

      http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/gangster-bankers-too-big-to-jail-20130214

      It refers to the HSBC bank being so greedy that they didn't hide their money-laundering activities. And their punishment for 9 years of ignoring US law, a fine that while numerically large, is a fraction of their illegal revenue.

      When no-one goes to jail, fines really are a 'cost of doing business'. And the finance industry has a lot of intrinsic flaws: necessity of trust, absence of separation and (meaningful) control, the 'house of cards' product valuations.

    5. Re:Is this really a surprise? by pantaril · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The likelihood that Mt Gox was complying with the "Know Your Customer" anti-money-laundering rules that apply to all financial institutions that handle currency was approx. zero.

      Mt.Gox is not US company. This is not mt.gox account being closed, this is Dwolla account being closed.

      What japanese anti-money laundering regulations does Mt.Gox violate? I don't know about any. I read that they are fully compliant with japanase KYC laws. But you probably have more information if you could write that they have almost zero probability to be compliant. Please share it, otherwise, it's just FUD.

    6. Re:Is this really a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mt. Gox does have a KYC process. I've done it, and their blog talks about scaling up humans at their document-review center to deal with the increased signup rate so others are doing it, too. Some of their features but not all are gated behind KYC.

    7. Re:Is this really a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jurisdiction isn't based solely on country of registration. Doing business in a country is usually sufficient. On the internet, where that's not clear-cut, jurisdiction may even depend on the actors involved. Jurisdiction is also non-exclusive, so if Mt. Gox wants to trade with an American they might both be bound by American and Japanese law.

      In particular, under U.S. FATCA rules, all Financial Institutions worldwide have to report on assets owned by US taxpayers. No bank is excluded, but FACTA also applies to non-bank financial institutions. Mt. Gox obviously is included, as is Dwolla.

  23. Innate Value by xdor · · Score: 1

    Most of your world is made up of things have innate value. Here's a few examples:

    1. Food
    2. Tools
    3. Shelter

    All of these items have intrinsic value because they are functional. Could you use any one of them as currency? Yes.

    But even if someone won't accept your item as currency: its intrinsically valuable because you could use it yourself.

    Food: can be eaten, tools can build things, shelter may keep out the weather. Functionality defines value.

    The value of gold as an intrinsic is based on its nearly unique property of very slow oxidation: it does not readily rust. Which means, if gold were plentiful, it would still have tremendous value: we would start plating cars with the stuff!

    1. Re:Innate Value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its nearly unique property of very slow oxidation: it does not readily rust

      Wait, wha?..

    2. Re:Innate Value by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      Uh, really slow, heavy cars I guess.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    3. Re:Innate Value by dkf · · Score: 1

      The value of gold as an intrinsic is based on its nearly unique property of very slow oxidation: it does not readily rust. Which means, if gold were plentiful, it would still have tremendous value: we would start plating cars with the stuff!

      It's suitable for use in microelectronics as part of the electrical bonding of chips to their packaging. That means it has real intrinsic value: you can make something with it. It's also not reactive with the body, and so suitable for use in certain types of prosthetics (e.g., teeth) and quite pretty, and so suitable for making adornments and other decorations. Yep, definite intrinsic value there.

      Which isn't to say that its current market value is comprised in the majority by its intrinsic value. It's also used as a repository of wealth, which is mostly not related to intrinsic value (heck, silicon dioxide of specified purity could be used for that too; gold's use there is merely conventional) and also for speculation purposes because of that repository use, and that speculation is virtually entirely unconnected to the intrinsic value. Just because gold has some intrinsic value, unlike a fiat currency where value is entirely driven by agreement, it doesn't mean that holding gold bought at a specific price is a good idea. It is not guaranteed to be inflation-proof, and certainly not so when in the throes of an investment bubble.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  24. Re:Not really news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, you're the sucker who thinks he can stop them, rather than running for cover like everyone else.

  25. Re:See! It it's not just a waste of tax payer mone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it would end up managed as a sub-department under the Homeland Electronic Regulatory Panel.

  26. Yes, other information is required sometimes by sirwired · · Score: 4, Informative

    For a small customer like yourself, nothing more than ID is required, which you've supplied. Once you start moving decent amounts of cash, the institution receiving the money is required to know something about the activities the cash came from. It doesn't matter that the currency was BitCoins; the same rules still apply. There are reports to file, records to keep, etc. For instance, a bank is expected to report activities like a hot dog cart suddenly depositing stacks of $20's well out of proportion to a plausible amount of sales.

    Not complying with these rules (which is "Financial Institution Regulatory Framework 101") is not going to end well.

    Mt. Gox was a shoestring operation that got in WAY over its head. (As in, actual banks have entire departments of employees dedicated to pretending to comply with these kinds of rules, warehouses (or tape libraries) full of documents stored away, etc.)

    1. Re:Yes, other information is required sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mtgox is a Japanese company, and they are fully compliant with the japanase KYC laws. Additionally, they have went on record as providing information on demand to american and european government authorities.

      Proving where the money you own comes from is not a real legal requirement. On high value deposits and international transfers you would have a field describing the type of activity that generated the funds. You don't have to prove anything, merely write a few words. Mtgox does not deal in cash.

  27. Avoiding bad publicity by tlambert · · Score: 1

    I think you're giving them too much credit. The DHS, like the TSA, is a very stimulus-driven organism. More likely they discovered some suspicious activity was utilizing Dwolla with Bitcoin, and decided to break the link between the two. The intelligence community in the US generally avoids bad PR as long as possible.

    Which is why the TSA is so beloved of us all, and why none of us cheered when Yukari Mihamae groped the TSA agent back...

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/17/yukari-mihamae-61yearold-_n_900969.html

    The only real surprise in that case is that you can't buy T-shirts with her face on it.

    1. Re:Avoiding bad publicity by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All anyone needs to know:

      I've often wondered why TSA seems so unresponsive to the American public, and this book offered me a plausible explanation. Hawley seems to view TSA almost exclusively as a weapon in the US war against Al Qaeda. When TSA implements policies that seem crazy or ineffective to the rest of us, it doesn't use outside opinions to judge the effectiveness of its policies. Instead it uses information gathered from the intelligence community unavailable to outsiders. A policy change is considered effective if Al Qaeda reacts in a desirable way. For example, if a TSA operation deploys VIPR teams at public transportation centers and suspected Al Qaeda operatives leave the US afterwards, the operation is considered successful.

      (From here.)

      Which, really, is despicable and absurd all on its own.

      But it does lend a lot of strength to the theory that all strange law enforcement actions of agencies created by or in the spirit of the PATRIOT Act are actually direct responses to some form of undesired activity.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  28. That webpage is not the whole story. by sirwired · · Score: 1

    Yes, Mt. Gox had some anti-money-laundering measures in place. But the legal requirements go far beyond merely verifying the legal identities of your customers, which is all that page covers. (If that was all KYC involved, banks would not need entire large departments dedicated to that function.)

    1. Re:That webpage is not the whole story. by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2

      Um, you have no clue what you're talking about. Mt Gox has bent over backwards to comply with all these rules. They not only do ID verification, they freeze accounts suspected of criminal activity, they have co-operated with the police in the past (notably, the German police), they do risk analysis of transactions and all the other things that banks do. This is by no stretch of the imagination "not even pretending to comply with the law". If you're really going to try and paint Mt Gox as some kind of rogue outfit, all you're arguing is that AML rules are so opaque, complex and difficult to comply with that it's impossible for a small company to work with money no matter how good their intentions are.

    2. Re:That webpage is not the whole story. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Yes, Mt. Gox had some anti-money-laundering measures in place. But the legal requirements go far beyond merely verifying the legal identities of your customers, which is all that page covers. (If that was all KYC involved, banks would not need entire large departments dedicated to that function.)

      in any case it's kind of funny that they star the proceedings by requesting seizure of a random associate account of theirs.
      and not contacting them, the japanese or anyone involved first.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:That webpage is not the whole story. by pantaril · · Score: 1

      But the legal requirements go far beyond merely verifying the legal identities of your customers

      I'm afraid unless you specify what legal requirements are violated by Mt.Gox you are just spreading FUD.

    4. Re:That webpage is not the whole story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, you have no clue what you're talking about. Mt Gox has bent over backwards to comply with all these rule

      Indeed, thats why they're registered as a MSB with FinCEN as required, or all of the other actual requirements that have nothing to do with what you stated..But its the world whom doesn't know what they're talking about, not you.

      In other news, protest wall st and banksters for ignoring financial regulations, but buuuuy bitcoins from mt gox and company, the only side-stepping of regulations thats okay is when I do it!!!1

  29. Diablo III Auction House Next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this different from DHS sending a letter to VISA telling them they can't process transactions for anyone trying to buy something off the Diablo III auction house?

  30. Sequestration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Janet Napolitano's cocaine allowance was hit hard by the sequestration. Now she is on a rampage to get her 'Smack' back by any means.

  31. No more dwolla Payments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ugg, I was about to sign up for Mt. Gox too. thanks for the post

    Mt. Gox has issued a statement:
    https://mtgox.com/press_release_20130515.html

  32. Mt.Gox initial response by xaosflux · · Score: 4, Informative

    "MtGox has read on the Internet that the United States Department of Homeland Security had a court order and/or warrant issued from the United States District Court in Maryland which it served upon the Dwolla mobile payment service with respect to accounts used for trading with MtGox. MtGox takes this information seriously. However, as of this time MtGox has not been provided with a copy of the court order and/or warrant and does not know its scope and/or the reasons for its issuance. MtGox is investigating and will provide further reports when additional information becomes known.

    Regards
    Mt.Gox Co. Ltd Team."

    https://mtgox.com/press_release_20130515.html

  33. Kill all authoritarians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anti money laundering laws need to go.

  34. I know why they did it by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

    I finally got interested in Bitcoins (like always, too late) and wanted to buy one yesterday. :-)

    Anyway, I wonder why this falls under the authority of the Orwellian "Department of Homeland Security". Doesn't such a matter belong to the FBI or the Secret Service?

  35. Reach out? by Alioth · · Score: 1

    Where has this plague of saying "reach out to" come from when people mean "speak to" or "contact"? It gives the impression of some kind of emo touching session.

  36. Euros? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh you silly hidebound 'merkin...

  37. strange coincidence? by psy0rz · · Score: 1

    Is it a strange coincidence that this news comes out around the time of the next fork? http://mineforeman.com/2013/05/13/last-forking-warning/ Is there some evil government conspiracy going on to bring bitcoin down, or is it perhaps some kind of "crash and cash" scheme, or can i leave my tinfoil hat at home?

  38. Only because I can swap it for something I want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're not up for reading factual accounts of money, try reading Terry Pratchett's "Making Money".

    Food takes you through times of no gold better than gold takes you through times of no food.

    Gold only has value because we assign it. It has no value other than as a means of keeping score.

    Just like all other currencies.

    It does have some residual utility that, for example, the modern "copper" penny or paper note doesn't, but the copper coins are worth more intrinsically than if they'd been manufactured from gold coins if the exchange of money was not based on agreeing that gold is valuable.

  39. Except it's expensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is why we use copper, not silver, the best conductor we have.

  40. Cash by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Cash is next.

    Within the year, the Right (or the White House; same diff) will slowly roll out a campaign that untraceable cash transactions are the lifeblood of criminals and terrerists and thus should be phased out. Upper limits on cash transactions for anything will be first, then - just like car rentals (a literal expression of freedom) - no cash purchases of communication products or services (read: burners) will be allowed. This will also help out finding and ...neutralizing... any potential whistleblowers even at the state and local levels.

    It's for you own safety, citizen.

  41. Re:See! It it's not just a waste of tax payer mone by who_stole_my_kidneys · · Score: 1

    sorry DERP is already taken http://www.derp.org/

  42. Re:Not really news by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Run, run away, and see how much you change.

    Running away from the future you don't want will just leave you always running

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  43. Re:Not really news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and you've registered with FinCEN as an MSB as required by law?

    pffft, banksters, always evading the law to make a buck.

  44. Re:See! It it's not just a waste of tax payer mone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the web of transactions occurring with that would form the DERPANET?

  45. Tide unscented? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those of us using BitCoin use it because it blows the dollar away for convenience in certain types of transactions (by which I don't mean "drugs" - Tide Unscented remains the king there, followed by US cash).

    Tide Unscented?? OK, you lost me there. I mean, it's a detergent, right? Is there some secret association of Tide Unscented with illegal drugs or drug buying that I don't know about? I admit I'm just an uncool AC who's post will likely be below most /. users' visibility threshold, but still... What am I missing here?

    1. Re:Tide unscented? by pla · · Score: 1

      Heh... Kinda a joke, in context, but...

      Not entirely.