Slashdot Mirror


User: centipedes.in.my.vag

centipedes.in.my.vag's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
114
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 114

  1. Re:Secret oversight on NSA Can Spy On Data From Smart Phones, Including Blackberry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're implying that the voting function changed any outcomes; and that is arguably not true. Further, being so aggressively victim-blaming is a pretty horrid view - and amazingly ironic given your username.

  2. Re:feature, not a catch on Mexican Village Creates Its Own Mobile Phone Service · · Score: 1

    Assuming that a queue doesn't exist, preventing you from making instant connections.

  3. Re:Anyone should be able to fly on One Strike Against No Fly List; More Scrutiny To Come · · Score: 1

    I wasn't ignoring them, but pointing out how they would be protested in the US.

  4. Re:Anyone should be able to fly on One Strike Against No Fly List; More Scrutiny To Come · · Score: 1

    Your right to travel is often suspended before conviction.

  5. Re:Anyone should be able to fly on One Strike Against No Fly List; More Scrutiny To Come · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Israeli also employs racial profiling. This is something the US can't/won't do (officially). Being PC is costing the US quite a bit, both in terms of effectiveness and monetarily.

  6. Re:I'll pass on Netflix Comes To Linux Web Browsers Via 'Pipelight' · · Score: 1

    A conspiracy with limited platform support.

  7. Re:OTOH on Transport Expert Insists 'Don't Dismiss Wacky Hyperloop' · · Score: 1

    Correction: The FBI hasn't been able to coax anyone into posing as an Al-Qaeda Assbomber, so they could then swoop in and Save The Day.

  8. Re:The Romans found out about lead on NRA Launches Pro-Lead Website · · Score: 2

    The rounds used for hunting are designed to expand (not fragment), and the over-penetration you're describing isn't an issue. Either way, as a bullet fragments it will stop moving forward.

  9. Re: How is this useless for self-defense? on Version 2.0 of 3D-Printed Rifle Successfully Fires 14 Rounds · · Score: 2

    If you can afford x, you can afford x*2 is a pretty obviously false for a huge range of x.

  10. Re: I hope it explodes and kills him on Version 2.0 of 3D-Printed Rifle Successfully Fires 14 Rounds · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If your political system is corrupt - go and change it.

    Using...

  11. Re:I hope it explodes and kills him on Version 2.0 of 3D-Printed Rifle Successfully Fires 14 Rounds · · Score: 1

    I'm referring to one of the core tenants of Libertarianism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle -- Your disagreement is somewhat irrelevant.

  12. Re: I hope it explodes and kills him on Version 2.0 of 3D-Printed Rifle Successfully Fires 14 Rounds · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're saying that you want to be killed by a torrent of really bad troll posts? That's what I'm getting from this.

  13. Re:I hope it explodes and kills him on Version 2.0 of 3D-Printed Rifle Successfully Fires 14 Rounds · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Live by the sword implies the use of the tool, not merely the existence of the tool. This man didn't murder anyone, it wouldn't be divine comeuppance for him to die. It would make as much sense (i.e. none at all) to look at a demolition engineer and say, "He worked with explosives, a bomb-maker, it's fitting that it exploded in his face." This man has not "lived by the sword" by any sane definition.

  14. Re:I hope it explodes and kills him on Version 2.0 of 3D-Printed Rifle Successfully Fires 14 Rounds · · Score: 1

    Hi, you either don't understand the premise of non-aggression, or intentionally ignore it. Don't do that. It cheapens your argument.

  15. Re:I hope it explodes and kills him on Version 2.0 of 3D-Printed Rifle Successfully Fires 14 Rounds · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nothing like wishing harm on people to show how you're morally superior and non-violent. Amirite?

  16. Re:Dictation versus typing on Forget Flash: Resistive RAM Crams 1TB Onto Tiny Chip · · Score: 1

    I'll add my voice to the dictation working camp. My new phone has a decent VTT texting feature. Occasionally I will need to repeat myself, but it's miles faster than typing on the whole. Voice recognition is getting to a functional point.

  17. Re:It's 270 Days to Brute Force on PIN-Cracking Robot To Be Showed Off At Defcon · · Score: 0

    That's why he used the term "fully", so it's a minimum time, assuming there are no other issues or delays.

  18. Re:Reoccuring on Don't Tie a Horse To a Tree and Other Open Data Lessons · · Score: 1

    Or the larger exploit, an ill-defined duration of said sale.

  19. Re:Can we discuss the fourth amendment now? on NSA Admits Searching "3 Hops" From Suspects · · Score: 1

    Yeah! Unless you're a Tea Party member, you shouldn't have any problems.

  20. Re:Grumble.. on New Atomic Clock Could Redefine the Second · · Score: 1

    The more exact and finite an objective standard of time we posses the better we can measure other things. More lines on a 4th dimensional ruler, if you will.

  21. Re:They came for the smokers, but I was not . . . on Obamacare Software Glitch Will Limit Penalties Charged To Smokers · · Score: 1

    I was thinking something along these lines. Maybe not the same lines. But my first thought was, "So what? I'll just lie."

  22. Re:LOL on Why Are Japanese Men Refusing To Leave Their Rooms? · · Score: 1

    Just like BDSM relationships reinforce physically abusive relationships? No. A fantasy, kept a fantasy, is harmless. Any assertion otherwise is ludicrous.

  23. Re:LOL on Why Are Japanese Men Refusing To Leave Their Rooms? · · Score: 1

    Could you please cite your assertions on the mechanism of conditioning? (i.e. Provide a demonstrable link between animated pornography and a rise in pedophilia.)

  24. Re:Past their time on BART Strike Provides Stark Contrast To Tech's Non-Union World · · Score: 2
  25. Re:Yet another great argument... on D.C. Awards Obamacare IT Work To Offshore Outsourcer · · Score: 1

    When you're categorizing and demonizing people for making money there's no issue (in public opinion) with making up all your numbers. They're the rich %1, after all, and they're evil evil evil.