Slashdot Mirror


Possible Graphene Alternative Made From Hemp Waste

MTorrice writes "A low-cost chemical process can turn hemp fiber into carbon nanomaterials. Researchers used the materials to make devices called supercapacitors that provide quick bursts of electrical energy. Supercapacitors made with the hemp nanosheets put out more power than commercial devices can." According to one of the authors, "Hemp bast is a nanocomposite made up of layers of lignin, hemicellulose, and crystalline cellulose ... If you process it the right way, it separates into nanosheets similar to graphene." Perhaps the process could be applied to related plants (hops?) too.

63 of 212 comments (clear)

  1. Pot solves everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If only pot were legal, and free, we could all just sit around getting high all the time and the world would be a better place. Government will provide what we need by taking it from evil rich people.

    Yay, free pot!

    1. Re:Pot solves everything by KGIII · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Pot. Is there anything it can't do? /might be a little high right now actually

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re:Pot solves everything by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Funny

      Plot twist: Marijuana summons Cthulhu to destroy the world. The "assholes" knew this whole time, they genuinely were acting in our best interests. Had they told us the reason why they wanted it illegal, we'd laugh them off. They were hoping we could get to the point where we could fight back, sometime in 2050, but no, the dirty hippies won and we were no match for the ancient ones.

    3. Re:Pot solves everything by isorox · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pot. Is there anything it can't do? /might be a little high right now actually

      It can't call the kettle black.

    4. Re:Pot solves everything by Molochi · · Score: 2, Funny

      You laugh, but marijuana in larger doses is said to induce "paranoia" and "hallucinations". However, these are just the codewords the government use to hide the fact that your pineal gland is being stimulated and re-activated. Anyone that has seen the documentary From Beyond, can imagine what will happen if this drug reached a critical mass of use and lowered The Veil that that separates THEM from us.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    5. Re:Pot solves everything by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tech epicenter moves from Santa Clara to Humboldt county.

      "Dude! Where's the check for our startup money. The guy from ImpossibleVentures was here, and I KNOW I put the cheque SOMEWHERE!"

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    6. Re:Pot solves everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude, can you score me some of that paranoia and hallucination bud? I'm outa those Amsterdam "space cakes".

                Seriously loads of religions around the time of modern mans emergence of conscience utilized massive amounts of cannabis. Even the Bible has been shown entymologically to give a recipe for psychoactive "anointing oil" . The widely accepted wrong translation of "calmus" yields what amounts to cannabis. If calmus were used for this oil, it would have produced a deadly, but briefly Ecstasy-like trip. If you accept cannabis as the ingredient, then the bible and the amount of hash eating,"incense filled tents" and anointing begin to make sense to what is marketed by organized religion as mystery.

    7. Re:Pot solves everything by KGIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      LOL True. It can't do that.

      Anyhow... I'm THAT guy. The guy that smokes and doesn't actually think that legalizing it will solve all the world's problems. I'm in favor of legalization and think that it would help solve *some* problems however. It is legal for me to smoke and grow now but I still think it should be legalized and subject to reasonable taxation.

      In case you're curious, I got my card because I have issues sleeping. I still have plenty of trouble sleeping but now I get to smoke weed legally. It hasn't helped though it does ease the paranoia to imbibe legally.

      I figure it would help lower budgets and stop us from incarcerating people for that particular victimless crime.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re:Pot solves everything by kilfarsnar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Legalizing marijuana and hemp would actually solve a lot of problems though. As you say we could stop locking all these people up for a mostly harmless activity. But it would also open up hemp as an industrial resource. As I'm sure you know hemp is useful for all kinds of stuff from textiles to paper to seed oil and meal. It grows fast and has little need for pesticides. But we can't grow it domestically because of our stupid prohibition.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  2. Great! by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    My ashtray is full of carbon nanomaterials stemming from hemp products.

    Am I rich now?

    1. Re:Great! by WillgasM · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've already patented the process you're alluding to.

    2. Re:Great! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, your tech is all vaporware.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:Great! by nospam007 · · Score: 2

      "Took me a second to see you already beat me to the punchline and even executed it much better. All carbon is burned up."

      Yes, it happily combined with oxygen and they're lying together in my ashtray.

    4. Re:Great! by omnichad · · Score: 2

      Carbon dioxide that is warmer than ambient air will float away. Unless you happen to keep your thermostat below -80 degrees Celsius.

  3. Re:Marijuana? by WillgasM · · Score: 3, Funny

    They're the same species, so yeah, probably close enough.

  4. Re:wait for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    United States

    Colorado [79], Vermont, and North Dakota have passed laws enabling hemp licensure. Both states are waiting for permission to grow hemp from the DEA. Currently,[when?] North Dakota representatives are pursuing legal measures to force DEA approval.[80] Oregon has licensed industrial hemp as of August 2009.[81] Hemp is not legal to grow in the U.S. under Federal law because of its relation to marijuana, and any imported hemp products must meet a zero tolerance level. It is considered a controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act (P.L. 91-513; 21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.). Some states have made the cultivation of industrial hemp legal, but these states — North Dakota, Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Oregon, California, Montana, West Virginia and Vermont — have not yet begun to grow it because of resistance from the federal Drug Enforcement Administration.[82]

  5. interesting stuff, but misleading by geoskd · · Score: 5, Informative

    They did in fact create a system that puts out more instantaneous energy per unit weight, but that is not the improvement that super capacitors need. They have improved gravimetric power density. The two measures that need improvement to make super capacitors more useful are gravimetric energy density (how much energy can it store in a given weight), and volumetric energy density. How much energy can it store in a given volume. Without significant improvements in those two areas, super capacitors cannot make significant inroads against batteries.

    It should also be noted that super capacitors already have better power density than chemical batteries by a wide margin, and are more than sufficient to replace I.C. engines and gasoline in that respect.

    --
    I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    1. Re:interesting stuff, but misleading by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      It should also be noted that super capacitors already have better power density than chemical batteries by a wide margin, and are more than sufficient to replace I.C. engines and gasoline in that respect.

      On the other hand they don't provide yet another excuse to incorporate hemp into yet another product or process. I consider hemp to be a sort of "wonder" material, as in, "I wonder what they'll try to put hemp in next just because they can.*" Oh, look! Another item with hemp in it! Surely US hemp policy must be changed now! No doubt it is a useful material, but it is easy to get the impression that hemp advocates are trying just a little too hard. It's also funny how the hemp advocacy often seems to run in parallel with certain other policy advocacy.

      * Hemp trousers. Hemp ice cream, hemp sandwich cookies, hemp milk. Hemp capacitors. Really now.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:interesting stuff, but misleading by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

      They did in fact create a system that puts out more instantaneous energy per unit weight, but that is not the improvement that super capacitors need. They have improved gravimetric power density. The two measures that need improvement to make super capacitors more useful are gravimetric energy density (how much energy can it store in a given weight), and volumetric energy density. How much energy can it store in a given volume. Without significant improvements in those two areas, super capacitors cannot make significant inroads against batteries.

      It should also be noted that super capacitors already have better power density than chemical batteries by a wide margin, and are more than sufficient to replace I.C. engines and gasoline in that respect.

      Yes but do they have the correct price to manufacture to beat internal combustion; and is it scalable; how much will it cost to shove out a 100 million super capacitor powered cars; do we currently have the supply of materials needed to supply the automotive industry; How much will the patent licensing cost? The patents of internal combustion have expired decades ago. Then you have the cost of building a power distribution infrastructure, charging stations, power transportation (improvement to the power grid) massively increase the power generation capacity of country (with internal combustion each vehicle is a self contained generator now the power for all of those vehicles will have to be made somewhere so now you will either have to build more dams, nuclear, or fossil fuel, as renewable does not have the energy output needed without taking up massive amounts of land. (Not everywhere has the enough consistent wind for wind-power or sun for needed energy level of the millions of cars in use so we would have to fill all of the areas that do and people are already complaining about windmills "ruining their view" and organizing NIMBY groups same as they did with nuclear.)) Then you have to convince all of the vehicle manufacturers to use they same power port - think cellphones where we have dozens of chargers because no one wants to use the same one for two devices. gasoline has a relatively low cost per joule easily established infrastructure very few patent and ip concerns and dozens of other reasons it sadly won't go anywhere anytime soon.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    3. Re:interesting stuff, but misleading by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      Say, that's really great. Now could you show me the list of Hollywood stars out promoting that we put soy in everything? Corn in everything? Where is the parallel to the whole hemp advocacy culture in broader society for anything else? Feel free to get back to me on that.

      By the way, I wasn't aware that one post constituted "harping." Maybe that post just seemed like it lasted a really long time to you . . . for some reason?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:interesting stuff, but misleading by Splab · · Score: 3, Informative

      The thing about hemp is it is bloody robust, you don't need GMO plants, you don't need nasty chemicals to make them grow - Earth, water and some sun and you are good to go.

      Making stuff out of hemp is a very eco friendly thing to do. (And you don't need to use the smoke-able hemp)

    5. Re:interesting stuff, but misleading by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      well they are ruining our engines by wanting to put more and more corn in our gas engines

      many hollywood stars like to push their vegan or vegie beliefs on americans. hell some of them even want to ban cow milk and make everyone drink breast milk!. I mean plain and simple there is nothing wrong with pushing something you believe in. now you can decide if you want to think that any and all hemp proponents are also stoners (I am, wont hide it) but the truth is that hemp is a hugely valuable resource and we are retarded for not using it. I mean we have a totally renewable resource, yet the powers that be want nothing to do with it. I am honestly surprised that the envorionmentalist movement is not attacking the government over hemp.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  6. undoing mod by hoboroadie · · Score: 2

    N/T
    Fuck touchscreen, fuck autospell.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  7. Re:Marijuana? by pspahn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Indeed, it's the same plant in the same way that a Yorkshire Terrier is the same animal as a Golden Retriever. Only through selective breeding did they reduce the THC concentrations low enough that the plants couldn't be practically used for psychoactive contents.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  8. Re:Marijuana? by WillgasM · · Score: 4, Funny

    And when you make them into hot dogs, they all taste relatively the same.

  9. And a use for kudzu, too! by jfengel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The wiki link to "bast" refers to a dozen species that produce basts, including flax, wisteria, mulberry, and kudzu.

    Is there a reason to go for hemp in particular, aside from the usual hemp-will-solve-everything? Flax is also produced in industrial quantities. TFA doesn't mention why they chose hemp bast.

    Look, I'm all for legalized weed and hate the propaganda that makes it out as a devil drug, but I'm not any bigger fan of exaggerations about the wonders of hemp. At least on this web site, it would be nice to look at actual data, rather than who can out-propagandize everybody else.

    1. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Yes there are other plants, but they're boring and do not serve as a backdoor totally-innocent-don't-look-at-me-like-that way to get marijuana legal. Every time there's a known stoner advocating for hemp it sets back the movement.

  10. Re:wait for it... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

    Colorado [79], Vermont, and North Dakota have passed laws enabling hemp licensure. Both states are waiting...

    So three states equals 2? Is that some kind of bong math?

  11. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    They're the same plant. Hemp (both industrial and medicinal strains) were banned because:
    a) there was hysteria over growing opium addiction, and the confusion about hashish (which was, at the time, a foreign and relatively unknown substance) lead some people to believe it was a form of opium
    b) it threatened the massive paper and fibre industries
    c) the 'top' media entrepreneurs at the time had investments in (b) and used their media empires to stoke the fear surrounding (a) to see hemp banned in the US alongside opium; then other countries followed because of the pressure put upon them by the US government

    A classic story of capital triumphing over Good Things.

  12. Re:Marijuana? by TrentTheThief · · Score: 3, Informative

    And since all this process requires are the stalks, then for all intents and purposes, yes. It is the same plant.

    The buds, which have recreational and medicinal uses aren't being used. The key word there is lignin. They're using the long, fiberous material not the buds.

  13. Re:Marijuana? by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Informative

    And just like those two Canis Lupus Familiaris any two Cannabis Sativa plants will breed and are thus one species.

    Actually hemp production focused far more on producing good fiber than reducing THC content. At least until very recently. The THC reduction was just a side effect no one cared about, not until we started having modern drug laws anyway.

  14. Re:Marijuana? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    Those are not generally used for hemp. The last one is way too short.

    The common cannabis used for both medical/recreational use and hemp was what I was speaking about.

  15. Re:Marijuana? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Funny

    And when you make them into hot dogs, they all taste relatively the same.

    Yeah, people get the munchies when they are stoned.

    Don't look at your dog that way when you get high.

    Dogs can sense when someone is thinking about eating them.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  16. Re:always amusing by WillgasM · · Score: 2

    If Linux is truly superior, then why isn't everyone using it? Surely Microsoft would jump all over that bandwagon.

  17. Re:Marijuana? by pspahn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Entire? Not quite. It's been discussed here plenty for you to already know that there are states that have enacted legalization.

    Colorado even just recently approved the regulatory structure for stores selling pot products.

    You may certainly continue to believe what you want to believe, it's just fictional.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  18. Ugh, potheads by Zadaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For all I know this is valid scientific research. But I can't even be bothered to find out because potheads have stigmatized hemp. "Dude, do you know hemp is 85% more efficient biomass than bacon?" "You know that hemp fibers can be turned into inferior yet expensive paper, right?" "Hemp-o-lene, it's either hemp biofuel or something you jump on." Which all are quite obviously thin excuses to grow more "medicinal"* hemp.

    And hemp is a pretty great material, but every time I see an article that talks about a new industrial use I can't help thinking it comes from the same people who giggle when they hear "420" and snerk when they mention how they're into 'hydroponics'.

    Seriously folks, if you want me to take you (hemp or pot smokers) seriously you need to clean up your game. Don't smoke a bowl on April 20th, instead bring to my attention how we really don't know the medical properties of cannabis because of government overregulation (or whatever, anything that has real promise to someone who has no interest in smoking pot.)

    *Medicine is sold at drug stores, not in shadowy places with a bouncer at the door and punny names like "Grass Roots Clinic" or "Foggy Daze Dispensary".

    1. Re:Ugh, potheads by WillgasM · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hemp's illegal because weed's illegal. But why's weed illegal; because someone long ago wanted to make hemp illegal. They had controlling share of an opposing market and wanted to eliminate the competition. Here we are decades later wishing to make hemp legal again, but we can't because apparently people still believe jazz musicians are trying to corrupt our white women. Forget the hempen trojan horse; I don't want pot legalized on a technicality. By default, pot should be legal unless someone can give me a valid reason to ban it. The reason it's illegal today is the same root reason it was banned in the first place: there's a powerful industry that makes money from pot being illegal. The paper/textile industries agenda has been replaced (and dwarfed) by our private prison system. "because we'll lose money" is not a good reason to impose regulation. I shouldn't have to defend pot because I've yet to see a valid attack.

  19. Re:always amusing by Animats · · Score: 2

    anytime an application needing plant fiber comes along, there's always a group that starts extolling the virtues of hemp for the purpose,

    If you just need biomass for something, there's lots of agricultural waste around. Find a use for straw, or corn husks and cobs, or bagasse (the leftover part of sugar cane). There are other long bast fibers available commercially - jute (used to make burlap), flax (used to make linen), and kenaf (sometimes used to make paper). For even longer fibers, there are plants from the banana family, such as abaca (once called "manila hemp", but it's unrelated) and sisal, which make good rope.

    There's a lot of cellulose out there, waiting for someone to come up with a process for making ethanol from cellulose cheaply. There are processes that work, but they still cost too much.

  20. Re:wait for it... by zlives · · Score: 2

    nope they will require a prescriptioin and be sold by big pharma for pile o profits

  21. Re:Marijuana? by pspahn · · Score: 2

    Also, here is a good article from a local magazine discussing the hemp industry here in Colorado. Westword

    Amendment 64 also doesn't require a federal permit to grow industrial hemp (as other states have done), so as it stands right now, go right ahead and grow it knowing that yours may be the landmark case that allows others to cultivate in the future.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  22. Re:always amusing by femtobyte · · Score: 2

    There are also verses about partying down with plenty of booze --- after all, a certain Nazarene carpenter's son's first biblical miracle was making sure a wedding party wouldn't run out of wine *after the guests were already pretty soused*. The overall message one might take away from the scriptures is "there are times to be sober, and times to not."

  23. Re:Charges good, man. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    Depends on how long the material is pulled and the girth of the feedstock.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  24. Re:Marijuana? by pspahn · · Score: 2

    Amendment 64 also doesn't require Colorado farmers to seek federal approval before growing hemp. But that doesn't mean the feds couldn't crack down if they wanted to.

    This is no different than those growing for medical and recreational purposes. Yes, the DEA can crack down if they want to, but it's not going to do any good in the long run.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  25. Re:Marijuana? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, but if you get such a store, you'll lose your KFC.

    It's an unfair trade.

  26. Re:Marijuana? by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 3

    On the contrary, the real reason marijuana is illegal is due to the huge benefits of hemp and relative cheapness/ease of growth. Corporate lobbying strikes again (or struck, back in the 1930's). Do some research if you're completely lost on what I'm referring to here (I'm sure the majority are).

  27. Re:always amusing by kimvette · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Agreed.

    As a Christian I am constantly appalled by idiots who cherry-pick verses out of context to support their prejudices. I don't think having a good time at a party (or at the wedding you referred to) is equivalent to being a drunkard. People who take verses to support their own biases, ignoring the context and what is actually being said make all Christians look bad.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  28. Re:always amusing by pspahn · · Score: 2

    Well, that's just incorrect these days. Yes, a lot of the pot from the 90's and 00's was considered "not good" if it had seeds. Nowadays, most pot is pretty damn good. If there are a few seeds because the plant hermaphrodized, then not a big deal.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  29. The 1% wants to keep you down, man! by tekrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So since William Randolph Hearst demonized Hemp and forever tied to to Pot, it's been illegal to grow in the USA. You do realize that in most of the free world, you can walk into a grocery store and still buy products made from Coca leaf?

    And yet in the "land of the free" almost everything is banned. Except guns. And you need those in case the government "takes away your rights". I hope you see the tremendous irony there.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  30. Re:Marijuana? by pspahn · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure there is plenty of demand considering anyone producing hemp products domestically (shirts, shoes, twine, etc) has to import their hemp from Canada, UK, etc.

    Which makes me wonder, if hemp is a class 1 controlled substance and is therefore illegal to grow, how is it that some hippy in the hills is able to import it from other countries?

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  31. Re:always amusing by Hatta · · Score: 2

    Notice how in the two cases where Cannabis is legal, it was legalized by referendum and not an act of the legislature. IOW, it was legalized by the people, not by the government. So my statement stands.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  32. Re:Marijuana? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

    Sympathies. Hopefully the Indica will be arriving in your neighborhood soon.

    Granting the best in the world is pure Sativa (Thai Haze). It's also outdoor only (18 month growing season).

    I'm looking forward to pot being fully legal, so we can get the good stuff (Thai, Panama Red etc) and stop having to smoke indoor compromise weed.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  33. Re:Marijuana? by wagnerrp · · Score: 2

    By recently, you mean hundreds of years ago. Shipping companies didn't want sailors cutting up and smoking their good hemp ropes.

  34. Re:wait for it... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    The totally hilarious segue to your post is that Marinol, delta-9-THC, one the primary active ingredients in Marijuana, is a DEA Class III drug. Like Vicodan. Subject to modest regulation, but totally legal.

    So the natural stuff is Class I - Heroin type dangerous. The concentrated, pure stuff is Class III - not so bad.

    Gotta love those smart people at the DEA.

    (Yes, I know, real marijuana is more than just THC and Marinol doesn't do as well as the real thing in getting you high. I've prescribed it so patients have an excuse to have marijuana on their urine drug screen but most prefer the wild type. It's also ridiculously expensive.)

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  35. Re:Marijuana? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    Ropes are made from the stalks of the plant. Even the most potent plant would have totally worthless stalks.

    Only the flowers are really useful for that, leaves could be a really poor substitute I guess.

  36. Re: Marijuana? by murphtall · · Score: 2

    Yup. Google "The Emperor Wests No Clothes"

  37. Re:Marijuana? by Molochi · · Score: 2

    So which do you smoke to get high, the Yorkie? I assume there's a lower TCH concentration in the Golden Retriever.

    --
    "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  38. Re:Marijuana? by ganjadude · · Score: 4, Informative

    You kind of glossed over the big issue (B). The issue was Dupont.(concerning hemp not marihuana) Dupont had just created the synthetic fibre. Dupont did not want competition. The same can be said for hurst and his wood pulp making venture. The fact that you can make as much paper on 1 acre of land with hemp yearly as it would take 30 acres of land a cycle of 20 years to produce the same amount of paper.

    This is the big reason it was banned. Now they also used the "black will rape white women" and "lazy mexicans smoke pot" as an excuse in the media (re: reefer madness for a good laugh. It is a funny movie minus the fact that they actually believed it to be true when made)

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  39. Re:wait for it... by ganjadude · · Score: 2

    its not even concentrated, marinol is totally synthetic. (patented) and therefore someone can make money on it. Pot grown in my.. i mean someones yard or basement cant bring money in.

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  40. Re:wait for it... by ganjadude · · Score: 2

    I would argue the "undesirables" are the ones who are keeping pot illegal, not the ones doing time for smoking a plant.

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  41. Re:always amusing by ganjadude · · Score: 2

    100 an oz of good weed in cali? shit if it were not for its politics and taxes it would be an awesome place for a stoner. in NY we talk about 3500LB being a good price (5 is not unheard of) and 300 a good OZ price (400 avg for top end)

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  42. Re:Marijuana? by Hatta · · Score: 2

    It's still illegal federally. Possession of any amount is a federal misdemeanor punishable by up to 1 year in PMITA prison. Now the feds don't have the resources to widely enforce that, but they can pick and choose. It's technically still illegal across the entire country, just not regularly enforced.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  43. Re:always amusing by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

    My kid brother lives in CO. You're still way behind and have a stupidly restrictive set of laws. In CA the feds have shut down most of the 'clubs', after all they were all registered and licensed so where very easy to close. Good thing the California law doesn't require us to register etc.

    Indoor is fading as the economics of outdoor takes over in CA. 5 years ago everybody and their brother were setting up indoor grows. I was shutting mine down as their just wasn't enough money left in it.

    Now you can buy used lights etc for about 20 cents on the dollar.

    BTW seeds from hermaphroditic plants are generally immature as the plant didn't start growing balls until late in the growing cycle.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'