Slashdot Mirror


Meet the 23-Ton X-Wing, the World's Largest Lego Model

First time accepted submitter awaissoft writes "There's big, then there's really big, and then there's colossal, which might be a good word to use when describing a near 46,000-pound Lego X-Wing that made a triumphant debut Thursday in New York's Times Square. The full-size replica, about 42 times the size of the Lego Star Wars X-Wing set available on store shelves, celebrates the debut of Cartoon Network's The Yoda Chronicles, which premieres on May 29 at 8 p.m. It took a small army of 32 Lego master builders, housed in a facility in the Czech Republic, to build the 45,980-pound, or 23-ton, Lego ship. It stands 11 feet high and 43 feet long, and contains more than 5 million Lego pieces."

32 of 121 comments (clear)

  1. Problem by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Funny

    The wings don't lock into the attack position. My nerd rage knows no bounds.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Problem by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Funny

      wings

      I think you mean S-foils.

      You can turn in your nerd card at the door.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Problem by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think you mean S-foils.You can turn in your nerd card at the door.

      "S-foils, also known as Strike foils or Stability foils, and on occasion as X-foils,[1] were movable wings..."

      You can turn in your engineering card at the door.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    3. Re:Problem by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, everybody knows they're wings (that's somewhat inherent in X-Wing).

      Nerds call them S-foils.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Problem by girlintraining · · Score: 2

      Nerds call them S-foils.

      Maybe starwars nerds have no problem with the wide assortment of whimisically named technology in the movies, but engineering nerds like myself are somewhat annoyed by the totally counterintuitive and useless name of 's-foil', which only a starwars nerd would recognize. For the rest of the world, the engineering term wings are a better description. Of course, in about 30 seconds, my computer's going to catch fire and begin vomitting angry noises as it's assaulted by millions of angry Lucas-lovers beating their star wars technical manuals and screaming, but hey. My nerdiness is no less valid than theirs...

      And I say they're WINGS.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    5. Re:Problem by Dahamma · · Score: 5, Funny

      So during the Battle of Hoth when they were seen in atmospheric flight... they were purely ornamental?

      Since they (along with most other spacefaring ships) were shown taking off and landing vertically, yeah, pretty much. Actually, the silly canonical explanation is they were for heat dissipation and "stabilization", just like the TIE fighter's "radiators" (which are clearly useless as airfoils).

      Though given this thread is arguing engineering principles in one of the most unscientific major sci-fi series in recent history, I think we can all safely claim various levels of pathetic nerddom. Sigh.

    6. Re:Problem by Xest · · Score: 2, Funny

      This has totally turned from humour into an actual nerd fight.

      I'll get the popcorn.

    7. Re:Problem by liamevo · · Score: 2

      Space != Sci-Fi

  2. Re:Glue by kcmastrpc · · Score: 5, Funny

    nonsense. the force is holding this one together.

  3. It's amazing, by ClaraBow · · Score: 3, Funny

    but does it run CrunchBang Linux?

    1. Re:It's amazing, by dsrg · · Score: 2

      Will it blend?

      --
      "Bees!" - Eddie Izzard
  4. How much did Disney pay? by msobkow · · Score: 2, Funny

    How much did Disney pay for this blatant slashvertisement?

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:How much did Disney pay? by kcmastrpc · · Score: 2

      Slashdot doesn't need any credits... move along.

    2. Re:How much did Disney pay? by ThePeices · · Score: 2

      How much did Disney pay for this blatant slashvertisement?

      Disney paid $0.00

      Lego X-Wing models are nerdy enough to warrant mention on Slashdot.

      Sorry if this doesnt fit into your conspiracy theory way of thinking, but thems the breaks.

    3. Re:How much did Disney pay? by cinky · · Score: 2

      Let me explain to you how this works: you see, the corporations finance Slashdot, and then Slashdot goes out... and the corporations sit there in their... in their corporation buildings, and... and, and see, they're all corporation-y... and they make money.

  5. Re:Seems legit. . . by mooingyak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's in Times Square. Not exactly an obscure location.

    Also, totally visible from my desk, which for once made having offices in Times Square not suck.

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  6. Re:A bit blocky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    That is exactly what they did. It is a scaled up model of Lego set 9493. Too bad it wasn't the UCS that came out this year....

  7. This pathetic blog link got greenlit? by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seems the editors couldn't figure out submitter "awaisoft" is a pissant blogger on the awaisoft.com domain
    There have been many articles about this around the Net today, and o fall of them, this one is by far the worst.
    For fuck sake, the entire blog posting was copied and pasted verbatim into the summary.

    Here's a real article over at PopSci with many pictures, a video and a good many more words about the project and what went into it.
    http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2013-05/world%E2%80%99s-largest-lego-model-life-size-x-wing-video

  8. Re:Seems legit. . . by mooingyak · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dunno what counts for you, but here's a few:

    Cnet

    gizmodo

    Starwars.com

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  9. Re:Seems legit. . . by mosb1000 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah, I already googled it. I feel like an idiot.

  10. Re:Seems legit. . . by mooingyak · · Score: 2

    You have a job where you can see times square from your desk and you say it sucks? I would trade your view for mine of a black topped parking lot and a building on the other side of it for yours any day of the week, so would millions of others who don't get to see times square of all places.

    You need to appreciate what you have.

    And you what you have. I would take you up on that trade in a heartbeat.

    The only plus is that I moved to the opposite side of the building so I'm not facing the giant flashing Nasdaq billboard all day long. There are flashing lights everywhere, it's very crowded, and the food is mediocre and expensive. I've worked in a few different parts of Manhattan and this is by far the shittiest.

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  11. Re:Glue by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Funny

    nonsense. the force is holding this one together.

    I see no duct tape in the pictures. I think you're mistaken.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  12. Re:Scaled up, not full sized by camperdave · · Score: 2

    It's actually not a full-sized X-wing, but a scaled up Lego X-wing, with the little bumps of the Lego blocks and all.

    Frankly, I think it's actually more fun this way than if it were a full-scale replica out of Lego. There's something "meta" about building a big Lego piece out of smaller Lego pieces.

    Yeah, except I can't find a white 4 block anywhere. Someone's used them all.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  13. Biggest LEGO model, nah. by batwingTM · · Score: 2

    This is pretty awesome, but Largest LEGO model, no way
    LEGO House

    --
    Leg Godt!
    1. Re:Biggest LEGO model, nah. by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 2

      Actual sense of scale here: House Built From LEGO Helps that it had a flat roof and mostly bare walls on its breadbox shape. But still that's a heckuva lot of bricks that went into the thing.

  14. Re:A bit blocky by LBt1st · · Score: 2

    I was disappointed by this as well. It's more like a replica of a replica. I was hoping they made something more detailed.

  15. Re:Glue by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    This is not the glue you are looking for.

  16. Two records in one: by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    The strongest girlfriend repellant ever made.

  17. Re:Seems legit. . . by Fuzzums · · Score: 2

    These are the links I was looking for.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  18. Crappy Antialiasing by VorpalRodent · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let me just say that they are doing a horrible job at antialiasing. I looked at those pictures, and there's jaggies all over.

    --
    Take it to the limit, everybody to the limit, come on, everybody fhqwhgads.
  19. Re:Seems legit. . . by camperdave · · Score: 2

    You guys get to look out windows?

    Yeah. Corporate policy. Everyone is forced to use Windows.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  20. Re:Glue by Misagon · · Score: 2

    From what I have hard, the Lego model makers use solvent to chemically weld the pieces together.

    When they can get a legal permit, they use GBL -- which unfortunately would turn into the drug GHB when you add water. Otherwise they use MEK. GBL is believed by Lego to be less toxic than MEK. (Well.. you are not supposed to drink either, so this is about skin contact and fumes.)

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley