Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Man Pleads Guilty In Celebrity Hacking and Harrassment Case

FuzzNugget writes "A 25-year-old man from Abbotsford, British Columbia has plead guilty to several charges involving the unauthorized access to a computer and phone belonging to singer Carly Rae Jepsen, who also hails from BC. It's alleged that after obtaining nude photos from the singer's computer and phone, he attempted to sell them to media outlets. The allegations also include releasing a fake sex tape claming to be of the celebrity. As a result, he was charged with a number of offenses, from unauthorized use of computer to (oddly) fraudulently obtaining telecommunications services, mischief to data, identity fraud, and possession of stolen property. It will be interesting to watch this unfold and see how Canada's laws on computer-based crimes compare to those of the U.S., particularly the notorious Computer Fraud and Abuse Act."

37 of 52 comments (clear)

  1. And now... by Cyfun · · Score: 5, Funny

    And now off to 4chan to see if anyone has found copies of the leaked pics.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, dot slashes YOU!
    1. Re:And now... by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 3, Funny

      So I tried ta join 4chan but after I entered all my personal info on /b/ nobody was nice and my computer crashed so i had ta send this from my moms ipad and she just got fired too btw cuz her boss hates her cuz of stuff that somebody put on her facebook page when I was wating to here back from 4chan. Anyway anybody know if they let me in? I gotta see Carly Rae Jepsen naked.

      --
      I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
    2. Re:And now... by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      First hit on google right now.

    3. Re:And now... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Yet another win-win (for her) situation: a guy hacks and is prosecuted. a not-that-famous-but-hot-singer gets a lot of publicity. all the geeks arounds search google for that singer.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    4. Re:And now... by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      I never got why people put barbells in their nipples. Boobs are perfectly nice without needing to decorate them, unless it's detachable frippery like tassels.

    5. Re:And now... by 16Chapel · · Score: 1

      Not that famous? She's quite famous on that new internet thing, you know.

    6. Re:And now... by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      I like pierced nipples, but on those tits... well, she needs to take attention away from them.

    7. Re:And now... by Virtucon · · Score: 1
      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    8. Re:And now... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      For the same reasons people get earrings, tattoos, or pretty much other body art... either they want it because they like it and like the look of it, or they want it because it's trendy to do so.

      Kinda like why people go straight for the full sleeves and neck tattoos. Whereas the people who have been quietly getting tattooed for years are just sort of wondering if these kids have really thought this through.

      I can go into the office and nobody will know I've got tats, but I see a lot of kids go straight for the most visible tattoo they can think of. When I see an 18 year old with the New York Yankees logo tattooed on their neck, I feel a little bad for them. Because, like it or not, people will judge them on it.

      And, to your specific question, I believe the pierced nipples gives you increased sensitivity, and something interesting for your partner to play with.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:And now... by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Would you not be worried you might rip a nip while getting a grip with your lip?

      Because that would be on my mind.

  2. i just met you, and this is crazy by decora · · Score: 3, Funny

    but here's my number, so hack me maybe

  3. Why would a celebrity by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    keep nude photos of themselves on their own computer?

    Narcissism?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Why would a celebrity by kruach+aum · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Real narcissists leak their own nude photos so they're on the internet forever, being copied from soulless machine to soulless machine over and over, haunting server farms of the deep future long after everyone's forgotten who the pictures are actually of. This is what it means to be immortal.

    2. Re:Why would a celebrity by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 3, Insightful

      keep nude photos of themselves on their own computer?

      Probably for the very same reason as celebrities leak their own sex tapes, in the hopes that someone will steal and publish them.

    3. Re:Why would a celebrity by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Most of people do not really weight the consequences of taking and carrying such pictures in their phone/laptop/google glasses/... Everybody is used to the consumption era where information circulates quickly and broadly... and what is not published (eg on FB) is kept private. Unfortunately, it is likely that many people do not have the necessary background to protect themselves / act geekfully and a lot of private data is stolen from various places. It only makes the news when the ungeek person is famous...

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    4. Re:Why would a celebrity by TheMathemagician · · Score: 1

      Because they're attention whores - those in showbiz anyway. Like Hayley from Paramore "accidentally" tweeting a topless picture of herself. Yah right.

    5. Re: Why would a celebrity by paiute · · Score: 1

      She's an idiot, if she would have just paid a "hacker" to claim to hack her phone it would have been on /. Seriously does anyone believe these sex tape and hacked phone stories anymore? Ever since Paris Hilton went from zero to famous (well, more famous, famous beyond "daddy owns hotels") from her sex tape every attention whore has been doing it.

      Seriously. Have you noticed that Erin Andrews is all over the place now? Why is that?

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    6. Re:Why would a celebrity by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Same reason you do -- for hookups on craigslist. Duh.

  4. Really? Abbottsford? by davester666 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    He probably moved there from Surrey.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    1. Re: Really? Abbottsford? by c-A-d · · Score: 1

      It's a step up from Surrey.... well, anything in the lower mainland is a step-up, even Richmond.

      --
      some karma... and kinda lukewarm about it.
  5. Re:We Are Number One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hello my brother, I have sad news for you. British Columbia has defected to Canada. Tis truly a sad day.

  6. Did the Judge say... by goodEvans · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pics or it didn't happen?

    1. Re:Did the Judge say... by Nyder · · Score: 1
      --
      Be seeing you...
  7. "Oddly"? by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't see what's odd about the charge for fraudulently obtaining telecommunications services.
    If she pays for her voicemail and internet and he accesses that voicemail as her, eg. using her pin, or remote controls her computer and uses it to send data to him (again on her dime), then he's fraudulently using her services.

    Back in the early days of prosecuting crackers/hackers they used the 'theft of electricity' laws to nail them because there weren't any laws to cover their actions. So if you penetrated a computer at location A they would nail you for the electricity used while that machine was under your control, as the victim would be paying for the power used by you.

    1. Re:"Oddly"? by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

      In my defense, the label is misleading. "Obtaining telecommunications services" leads you to think that it's the act of using a carrier's service without paying.

      He received no "service" by accessing her computer, only "data". Yes, it's semantics, but I do think it's an important distinction and I think labeling it under this guise is badly presumptuous law.

    2. Re:"Oddly"? by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      It wasn't the value that was relevant. The laws existed regarding theft of utilities and had penalties associated with it, so they were able to use that whatever the cost.

    3. Re:"Oddly"? by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      I think there was an example of this in The Cuckoo's Egg by Clifford Stoll.
      It might have been in Hacker Crackdown or another book at the time though. I devoured them all at that age :)

  8. Re:We Are Number One by JustOK · · Score: 2

    Well, Columbia didn't want them, since they were so British.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  9. The charges aren't odd by Mashiki · · Score: 2

    The one regarding " fraudulently obtaining telecommunications services" is pretty straight forward.

    326. (1) Every one commits theft who fraudulently, maliciously, or without colour of right,

            (a) abstracts, consumes or uses electricity or gas or causes it to be wasted or diverted; or

            (b) uses any telecommunication facility or obtains any telecommunication service.

    Noting:

    (2) In this section and section 327, "telecommunication" means any transmission, emission or reception of signs, signals, writing, images or sounds or intelligence of any nature by wire, radio, visual or other electromagnetic system.

    That charge can be laid against someone who illegally uses access to a telecommunication service--meaning phones, illegal wiretaps, and so on. Also including breaking into wifi networks and so on.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  10. Why Do People Still Take Nude Photos on Phones? by Striikerr · · Score: 2

    I am at a loss as to why people and in particular, celebrities (regardless of how minor) continue to take nude pictures on their cell phones. They have to or should know by now that phones go missing, computers get hacked and all of those pictures can and will wind up on the internet. This has happened so many times in the past with the releases being quite publicly discussed and yet there seems to be no end to people shooting pictures of themselves which they do not want the public to see.
    The worst issue is with teens sending pictures to their girlfriend / boyfriend, trusting them and believing that they will always be together as these pictures can be quite damaging to the individual if / when released to their peers. I guess we still need to educate the masses about the risks inherent to these types of media devices.

    1. Re:Why Do People Still Take Nude Photos on Phones? by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      There have also been instances where a minor takes a picture of themselves nude, sends it to their boyfriend and then gets charged with distribution of child pornography. Ironically, they probably get tried as an adult.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:Why Do People Still Take Nude Photos on Phones? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2

      Or maybe people could show a bit of class and not have nude pictures lying around where anyone could find them.

      If the only way for you to make a name for yourself is to show your nude body, you might want to reconsider your employment choices.*

      * Some Playboy and Penthouse folks have degrees and use them. They're not being nude just to make money.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    3. Re:Why Do People Still Take Nude Photos on Phones? by Chirs · · Score: 1

      Some Playboy and Penthouse folks have degrees and use them. They're not being nude just to make money.

      Sure they are.

      The fact that they may *also* be smart/talented doesn't affect the fact that the vast majority of them are getting nude purely for the money. Maybe some for the thrill. They're certainly not doing it to solve world hunger, cure cancer, or bring about global peace.

  11. Re:Deserved by jitterman · · Score: 1

    Co-fucker? If you're like this face to face, I don't imagine you HAVE a co-fucker. Which would in turn possibly explain the 'tude. Vicious cycle, no?

    --
    For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
  12. Ahem by phorm · · Score: 1

    I need to *ahem* review these in my chambers to determine their authenticity. Let's take a brief half-hour recess

  13. Googled her name, little confused... by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 1

    isn't that just Taylor Swift with a dye job? Is this another Chris Gaines thing?

    --
    Sig. Sig. Sputnik
  14. Re:Mischief to data by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

    Indeed, I thought that one in particular smelled like some pretty ripe bullshit.