Slashdot Mirror


Temporal Cloak Erases Data From History

ananyo writes "Electrical engineers have used lasers to create a cloak that can hide communications in a 'time hole', so that it seems as if they were never sent. The method is the first that can cloak data streams sent at the rapid rates typically seen in telecommunications systems. It opens the door to ultra-secure transmission schemes, and may also provide a way to better shield information from noise corruption (abstract). The researchers manipulated laser light in time to create regular periods with zero light intensity (a Talbot carpet) in which to hide data. Unfortunately, the current set up erases the data-adding event entirely from history. Though they are confident that future modifications will allow them, or others, to send secret messages successfully, the more immediate use of the technology will be to cut down crosstalk when multiple data streams share the same fibre." Also at Slash Datacenter.

19 of 102 comments (clear)

  1. what by Ragzouken · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe it's just that it's late, but I have no idea what that summary was trying to say.

    1. Re:what by sosume · · Score: 5, Interesting

      FTA: "Unfortunately, the current set up erases the data-adding event entirely from history. "
      So how do they know that they sent it in the first place?

    2. Re:what by DougOtto · · Score: 2

      "Trust us"

      --
      Solving Unix problems since 1989...
    3. Re:what by Antipater · · Score: 2

      Here's an explanation from the last time the media tried to report on time-cloaking. I think it came off a little more clearly.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    4. Re:what by CaseyJParker · · Score: 2

      Um ... time travel? :\

    5. Re:what by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      Maybe it's just that it's late, but I have no idea what that summary was trying to say.

      When this article was posted yesterday, you understood it completely. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find the uri anymore to prove it to you....

    6. Re:what by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      1. Encode data in beam.
      2. Manipulate beam in funky ways so data is removed.
      3. ????
      4. Profit!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    7. Re:what by Garridan · · Score: 2

      For some reason, the researchers couldn't seem to remember the answer to that question when asked.

    8. Re:what by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

      Pics or it did happen.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    9. Re:what by kaws · · Score: 2

      I think that's exactly the problem that they're having. They're erasing a signal from history instead of just cloaking it.

    10. Re:what by TheCarp · · Score: 3, Informative

      I never did much time in college either but, that's besides the point. I found a couple of better articles and exploitations, by people who seem to actually understand it:
      http://www.technologyreview.com/view/424682/first-demonstration-of-time-cloaking/

      So, they are speeding up some photons, and slowing others, to create a "gap", passing something through that gap, and then, readjusting speeds. So, imagine the beam is..... Route 1 in Saugus MA. One of my favorite roads. Its not just 6 lanes of bumper to bumper traffic, that traffic is bumper to bumper at full speed.

      Like most beams of light, you have fuck all chance of passing through it without casting a shadow (this is the detected event being "hidden"). But imagine if all the cars were in communication by computer. A mile down the road about haldf the cars speed up, and bunch together, and the other half all slow down, then all resume normal speed, creating a traveling gap.

      Now, if you knew this gap was coming, you could scurry through it without traffic detecting you across the pavement.... after which, they perform the opposite operation, sealing the gap, as if nothing happened.

      Sounds like a really cool system doesn't it? Now lets imagine it has a limitation of a 100 foot gap, moving at 75 MPH, giving you less than a second to pass the 60 feet of tar before you get....detected

      I think part of the reason this sounds so weird is the terminology. It makes sense, there is no point in space where an object can be continuously and not be detected by the beam, however there are points which the beam intersects in space where the object can be, between the beam, and not interfere with the final beam...

      Or at least, that's what I get from it.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    11. Re:what by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because the light pulses went into the pipe. Theoretically, if the build their modulators right and exactly undo what they did to make their "time holes" (which normal people would call dark intervals the original unmodulated light will be there on the fiber, superposed with a temporally spread version of the coded pulses they injected, which would be there, but hard to detect.

      At the other end of the obscured connection, the trick is to run the same modulation scheme again exactly and if you do it just right, the monochromatic component of the light will once again be spread into the gappy modulation pattern you had at the first modulator output, and the pulses you injected will be there in the otherwise dark intervals.

      The scheme depends on two things: (1) you have to time it exactly so that you don't lose the phasing between the original modulator pair and the modulator at the receiving end. If you miss the phase, your data will be in the bright intervals instead of the dark intervals and you won't be able to read it easily. That's what apparently happened in this experiment and why they're confident that what they did really happened even though they didn't get their data back out of the system. The other thing (2) it depends on is that the modulators have to be linear enough that when you modulate and remodulate the light, you don't mix the spectra of the data with the stream you're using to obscure the pulse sequence. If they mix, you won't get a clean signal out no matter how exactly you match the modulators.

      The second is a likely limitation on this scheme because they are using nonlinear modulators -- all electro-optically active materials are nonlinear. Linear materials don't modulate light. To do completely linear modulation, you would need to do the modulation mechanically, which is much to slow to create the kind of quite intervals they need to obscure their data.

  2. Erasing from history? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't that what happens when you touch the crack in the universe caused by an exploding Tardis?

  3. errr... by Arancaytar · · Score: 2

    How does the recipient get the message, if it's so thoroughly erased?

  4. "Erased from history"? by Millennium · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does this mean they've proven the past is mutable?

    1. Re:"Erased from history"? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

      The funny part is that this technology has already been invented multiple times... they just keep erasing it.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  5. Re:Uhm... by Intropy · · Score: 2

    Yes. And I used to have already had told you that, but now I haven't yet not failed to have told you. That's why you now no longer know. You've now never known!

  6. Proof that it works by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here's proof that it works. I used it to cloak my First Post. Go ahead and check. You won't see it there.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  7. reinventing color tv by slew · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As far as I can tell, they are mostly just doing a twist on something that was known a long time ago: quadrature modulation.

    The way color TV transmission worked in the past (not anymore, it's all digital now, but I digress) was that they crammed 3 signals in the space original meant for black-and-white TV by basically converting RGB into Y (an approximation of the Black and White signal), and two color difference signals. These color difference signals were modulated to a high alternating frequency pattern (so that old B & W sets wouldn't see them very much) and then put into quadrature with each other (each signal getting about 1/2 the spatial frequency bandwidth, and essentially interleaving them in time). In some sense in quadrature modulation, you are hiding one signal in the "nulls" you create in the other signal.

    In this so-called "cloak" technique, the modulation is more complex and instead of trying to transmit two equal bandwidth signals together, they are exploiting the fact that their is no reason that the split has to be equal...

    The below example is overly simplified single-split case, but illustrates what is going on...

    Original: Signal ~ sin(wt+kx)
    Phase Modulated signal with simple small split phase shift "p": Psignal ~ 0.5*sin(wt+kx+p)+0.5*sin(wt+kx-p)
    And using the magic of trigonometry ... Psignal ~ sin(wt+kx)*cos(p)

    If the transmitter controls the phase just right, the "cosine" modulates the original signal and creates periods of time where the amplitude is really low (not really zero except at a point), yet back to their nominal amplitude at the receiver. Since the transmitter know when these "nulls" will be, it can put in short bursts of another covert signals that looks nominally like the original signal (same base frequency), but won't really be visible at the receiver (presumably the transmitter would pick the phase parameters of this covert signal so that they were "null" at the receiver).

    In practice, a single 50-50 split with complementary phase shift isn't really that great, you have to more harmonics approximate more interesting signal envelopes. Think about making a square wave out of harmonics and you can see how you might make the apparent "null" times much longer.

    Thus to the outside observer it looks mostly like the original signal (same nominal frequency for symbols being transmitted since the phase shifts are small, it would just look like jitter), but the transmitter was able to finesse the transmission so that it could transmit relatively normally so that the receiver would still pick out the signal. During the "null" times, the transmitter could transmit a covert signal which isn't picked up by the normal receiver but looks like a plausible innocuous signal, so a simple cursory observation of the channel looks as if only generic transmission is going on.

    We don't have to call this stuff using descriptions like temporal cloaks and erasing information from history. Except perhaps analog color tv transmission (may it RIP)