SCO v. IBM Is Officially Reopened
stoilis writes "Groklaw reports that the SCO vs IBM case is officially reopened: 'The thing that makes predictions a bit murky is that there are some other motions, aside from the summary judgment motions, that were also not officially decided before SCO filed for bankruptcy that could, in SCO's perfect world, reopen certain matters. I believe they would have been denied, if the prior judge had had time to rule on them. Now? I don't know.'"
Can't this just die already?
This is going to be the worst sequel ever.
I officially move that this case be renamed from SCO v. IBM to Jason Voorhees.
While we are probably tired of hearing about and how long this case took, I would like to see an outcome. The thing is that SCO never actually lost the case and IBM never truly won. SCO was tied up in bankruptcy and the Novell case and could not proceed. IBM isn't objecting; I think they want to destroy any remnants of SCO. Personally I would like to see happen would be the GPL tested in a case so any FUD by SCO is rejected in a ruling. Most likely SCO is likely to lose on summary judgement and the GPL issues never go to trial.
Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
I always thought that they were mythological, I now have to admit that I was wrong; dead things can come back to try to suck your blood!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jarndyce_v_Jarndyce
Would be a great topic for another novel for a modern Dickens.
I hope their creditors they shafted when they filed for bankruptcy last time are first in line to get paid, before the new lawyers. (and the old ones, since they were the cause of it)