Slashdot Mirror


Yahoo Puts AltaVista To Death

An anonymous reader writes "Remember AltaVista from the late '90s? Yahoo is finally pulling life support and letting Altavista die a noble death after over 15 years of hard service." You can only take so many years of being a running gag.

176 comments

  1. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I won't believe it until Netcraft confirms it

    1. Re:Obligatory by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Funny

      So let me get this straight, Yahoo owns Altavista and uses Bing for a back end, took down Altavista only to put it back up with a yahoo back end, that is really being back ended by Bing?

      Damn no wonder they pulled the plug, hell the ping times must have been awful!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:Obligatory by MichaelSmith · · Score: 0

      It sort of makes sense because windows is basically VMS.

    3. Re:Obligatory by SeaFox · · Score: 2

      Looks like they can already confirm the death of TFA's bandwidth allotment.
      Any "life support" from Yahoo so we can read it?

    4. Re:Obligatory by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      Windows is absolutely not VMS. They share a common founding father, but (Open)VMS is still easily considered far more capable and forward thinking in many respects than Windows ever has been.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    5. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse with RT, I heard they removed the HAL and Sub-systems concepts. If true, RT is a peice of shit.

    6. Re:Obligatory by tibit · · Score: 0

      And I heard you were deaf. See where this is going?

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    7. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I still miss geocities :(

    8. Re:Obligatory by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Yahoo loves taking it and giving it in the back end!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    9. Re:Obligatory by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sir I used VMS, knew VMS, VMS was a friend of mine, Windows is no VMS.

      Cutler used some of the same IDEAS he used in VMS, same as Torvalds rightly or wrongly, depending on your opinion of the results, used ideas from minix and Unix, but the results are NOT the same. Most of the ideas like portability which Cutler incorporated into early NT in fact were removed for speed, which is now why MSFT can't get away from X86, if they would have actually kept Cutler's ideas it would have been trivial to port, but they went the speed route and it bit them in the ass.

      For an example of how badly "Wintel" infected that company look at how Cyrix and Winchip ran great on OS/2 and BeOS but barely passable on Windows, or hell how the Bulldozer arch by AMD gets a lot more performance under linux than Windows.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    10. Re:Obligatory by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Yeah I know, I am mostly joking but recently a windows admin was talking about their issues with windows clustering and they used terms which I found very familiar from dealing with VMS clustering so I wondered if it had come straight from [DEC|Compaq|HP]. VMS was a friend of mine too. I have a copy right here and an alpha server to run it on.

    11. Re:Obligatory by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't be long; the story is /.'d, but I assume they're filling the Altavista servers with hot grits like liquid glass in a clunker.

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those running Linux, all naked and petrified, just like Natalie Portman.

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    12. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From now on, the ultimate expression of Internet irony is to search Netcraft with Altavista. I just tried it. The experience was silvery.

    13. Re:Obligatory by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Man the sad part to me is there was all these great OSes that did NOT lose because MSFT was Darth Vader but because the ones owning the OS didn't have a damned brain. VMS? great, BeOS? great, OS/2? great, I ran all three at one time and when they were in their prime they were better than what MSFT had out at the time by a pretty big margin but they were just handled sooooo badly.

      That is why I have this theory that so far has proven true time and time again, that all that "EEE" and "shoot 'em in the head" bullshit by MSFT was just bravado covering up what the REAL source of their fortune was, which could be summed up in "And then the other guy did something REALLY dumb". You look into the history of VMS,BeOS,OS/2 and time and again you'll see them do just boneheaded shit that opened the door wide and gave MSFT a free pass.

      But I wouldn't be surprised if there is still a LOT of backend that behaves like VMS, guys here can say what they want but NTFS is pretty damned solid and most of the early NT work was all Cutler and the man knew his stuff.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  2. AltaVista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    AltaVista still exists?

    1. Re:AltaVista by bonehead · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, but it's not what it used to be.

      Back in the day, it was the best search engine out there. Used it dozens of times every day. Granted, that was back when "www.hp.com" was an invalid URL and you had to use "www.hp.boise.com" to get a printer driver, but still....

      Can't necessarily say I''m "sad" to see them go, but it does raise a little pang of nostalgia.....

    2. Re:AltaVista by Creepy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah - loved it in the early days, but Google just nuked it as far as speed of search results and page load time went, and then it went the way of the dodo. One of the things they did far better than Google for a long time was translate. Google's first few passes at it produced some pretty horrible translations and lacked much of an idiom database, something they've vastly improved since (milchgesicht comes out 'baby face' now, not 'milk face' when translated from German, for instance, and Altavista's babelfish was one of the few that got it correct for a long time).

    3. Re:AltaVista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's already gone- altavista.digital.com doesn't open!

    4. Re:AltaVista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can still use Webcrawler. I went from Webcrawler to AltaVista to HotBot to Google to Bing and finally to DuckDuckGo.

    5. Re:AltaVista by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It still seems so recent that I overheard someone say they were going to "have to search for that on google" and thinking "What, is that like altavista?"

    6. Re:AltaVista by bonehead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Heh... Yeah...

      Back when I was still using altavista, I heard something about a search engine called "google" here on slashdot. People seemed to like it, but I couldn't figure out why. Lots of people raved about how cool their "simple" page was, but I didn't think that was a big deal. Tried google once in the beginning, wasn't impressed with the search results, and kept going with altavista.

      Was probably a little over a year later I was looking for something, altavista wasn't finding it, so out of desperation I figured I'd give this "google" thing a try. The exact thing I was looking for was the first result. Never used altavista again.

      By the way. I never did buy into that whole "Don't be evil" crap. I wasn't born yesterday.

    7. Re:AltaVista by jamstar7 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ah, the original babelfish link, http://babelfish.altavista.com./ I used it long after I started using Google for searches. Agreed, the translations were head and shoulders above everybody else.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    8. Re:AltaVista by Cito · · Score: 1

      My first favorite well after using Gopher, Archie, and such

      but when web got popular

      was Webcrawler and Lycos I occasionally used AltaVista

      but Webcrawler was the fastest simplest design... I swear google stole the minimalist design from Webcrawler...All Webcrawler had was a logo and the search bar that was it, no news, no ads, nothing.

      it was awesome

    9. Re:AltaVista by msauve · · Score: 1

      Ever tried dogpile.com?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    10. Re:AltaVista by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I mostly remember AltaVista because for many years (before Google Translate showed up) the AltaVista translator was the best and easiest way to translate foreign language text into English.

    11. Re:AltaVista by Z00L00K · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I stopped using Altavista when they nuked the "NEAR" keyword.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    12. Re:AltaVista by VanGarrett · · Score: 4, Informative

      What really got me in to Google was how light their search page was. It had one, small graphic, and the rest was just a precise bit of HTML. In those days, the best I could do was a 26.4Kbps dial-up connection, which made Google an outstanding choice over Yahoo! and Dogpile, which had been frustrating me with all the crap that was necessary to load before the page was useful. It really made a huge difference, and I'm thinking that's more significantly responsible for their initial success than even the quality of their search results.

    13. Re:AltaVista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does. AltaVista ROCKED in its day. Of course the same could be said about Wordperfect and Lotus 123 too, but who remembers those anymore. :(

    14. Re:AltaVista by GerryHattrick · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Astonishing that they killed a respected (if unserviced) Brand like 'Altavista', and went on using a stupid (if Swiftean) word like 'Yahoo'. So it's not just Microsoft and HP that can get global marketing completely wrong.

    15. Re: AltaVista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transnations at Google suck big time still. The spellchecker for chrome does to.

    16. Re:AltaVista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn you just made me feel old with a fucking granddad like search engine.story. go away death im not ready for you yet!

    17. Re:AltaVista by pegdhcp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you remember DEC? If they could see the potential in search engine market, they would end up buying Compaq and HP, with the head start they have. For the sake of fairness, I do not think nobody could see search services as a major product before Google showed us.

    18. Re:AltaVista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... Alta Vista was the fastest most accurate search engine by a mile when it first appeared - mainly because they installed server swith massive amounts of RAM ... for the time .. that meant all search and sort operations were memory based. Then Yahoo appeared (and they did a lot of their indexing manually), and then Google got its act together ... and Alta Vista started being stymied by the sheer size of the Web it was trying to index.

      The rest, as they say, is history.

    19. Re:AltaVista by flyingfsck · · Score: 2

      You'll have to pry Archie and Veronica out of my cold dead hands...
      What do you mean gopher is not working?

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    20. Re:AltaVista by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've heard Larry Page eats babies and drinks the blood of castrated goats. It must be true because Google lies so much.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    21. Re:AltaVista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many times I read the prompt "What to do with all those apples..."

    22. Re:AltaVista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if u ommitted the question mark I could have modded you up informative.

    23. Re:AltaVista by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Can't necessarily say I''m "sad" to see them go, but it does raise a little ping of nostalgia.....

      FTFY.

    24. Re:AltaVista by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, that is true. I found it through one of the expert guides at The Mining Company.

    25. Re:AltaVista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember first using the internet and instantly being frustrated trying to find things by guessing what the URL was (what ever a URLS was). I was too nervous to look at the kids computers next to me to see how they were using the web browser. I pretty much invented google in my head, I got as far as Kramer with his Levels.

    26. Re:AltaVista by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Granted, that was back when "www.hp.com" was an invalid URL and you had to use "www.hp.boise.com" to get a printer driver, but still....

      Was that also back in the day when the search engine was altavista.digital.com?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    27. Re:AltaVista by funkboy · · Score: 1

      pretty much mirrors my experience... used alltheweb.com (fast.no) for a while too.

    28. Re:AltaVista by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      You saved me mentioning that. I used to use dogpile all the time. It was a great way of aggregating search results from all (or most) of the more commonly-known search engines.

    29. Re:AltaVista by sensei+moreh · · Score: 2

      It does. AltaVista ROCKED in its day. Of course the same could be said about Wordperfect and Lotus 123 too, but who remembers those anymore.

      Alas, I knew them all so well. I even remember Wordstar and Visicalc. I must be old.

      --
      Geology - it's not rocket science; it's rock science
    30. Re:AltaVista by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      AltaVista ROCKED in its day. Of course the same could be said about Wordperfect and Lotus 123 too, but who remembers those anymore. :(

      I do. I even remember WordPerfect in its original implementation on Data General minis. Of course, that was when we still had the ARPANET, most likely before a lot of /. denizens were born...

    31. Re:AltaVista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...Was probably a little over a year later I was looking for something, altavista wasn't finding it, so out of desperation I figured I'd give this "google" thing a try. The exact thing I was looking for was the first result....

      Wow... I'd completely forgotten about the pre-google era when if you didn't find something, you'd try another search engine!

    32. Re:AltaVista by lxs · · Score: 2

      Don't worry gramps. Hotbot is still going strong.

    33. Re: AltaVista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, Yahoo! still exists? :-)

    34. Re:AltaVista by blane.bramble · · Score: 1

      Ahh, AltaVista, Gopher, the original Keeper Of Lists. Back when the web was young and more interesting.

    35. Re: AltaVista by captain_dope_pants · · Score: 1

      Spellcheck patently sucks - presuming you posted from Chrome ? :p

      --
      while (true != false) process_more_stupid_code();
    36. Re:AltaVista by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      YES! It lives in an Arizona retirement community next to Snap.com remember that one?

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    37. Re:AltaVista by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Back in the day it was a terrible search engine for anything but warez! I'm not sure what internet you are using but I'm sure on mine it was a horrible search engine, snap was better, most of Altavistas results were hispanic.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    38. Re:AltaVista by kerrbear · · Score: 1

      In my thinking, although your point may carry too, Google nuked Alta-Vista because it had a page free from clutter. Back then everyone was trying to be a portal and Alta-vista and Yahoo, etc. looked like crap and I recall the load time being so long because of all the crap they flung at you. This was back in phone modem days. Then along comes Google with a single line on a white page. I thought, "wow, they are not trying to exploit me." and whether they were or not, it worked. Once they established the reputation, then they were able to use their resources to improve the search continually.

    39. Re:AltaVista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I switched to Google when that "scandal" broke (in tech circles) that Yahoo was allowing sites to pay them to come up higher in search results sometime back in the early 2000's. Your intended subject was never first as a result.

    40. Re:AltaVista by s7uar7 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Google even went so far as to not close their body and html tags back then because all the browsers still rendered the page correctly and it saved them a few bytes per page.

    41. Re:AltaVista by 6 · · Score: 1

      It's not so much that they didn't see the potential; it's that they couldn't let go of their legacy business to pursue other avenues while that legacy was so much of their culture and revenue.

      DEC saw Unix coming and responded with Ultrix; they saw internet search coming and responded with AltaVista etc etc. In every case DEC saw technology and change and made great products in response.

      What they didn't do was really commit to those products.

      For DEC it was all about VMS. Especially on VAX and later on Alpha. Other products could exist but the core of effort and marketing always had to go that directions.

      It's a story that has played out over and over in tech at Wang, IBM, and even now is playing out at Microsoft.

    42. Re:AltaVista by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      That's been a piece of revisionist history, propagated by Google itself during the mid '00s, as a branding tactic. Google was a mere geek's toy during its first couple of years.

      People started switching because the other search engines were full of spam, porn, and advertisements, and along came Google with its PageRank algorithm, which proved very effective at the time.

      People suffered through all other search engines' "portals" for years and would not have switched if the only thing Google had to offer was a "page free from clutter."

      Of course, eventually Google turned into another advertisement-riddled, cluttered portal, full of spam and irrelevant junk. The more things change...

              dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    43. Re:AltaVista by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      When you say, "back in the day," when exactly do you mean? AltaVista was indeed a great service in the mid-to-late 1990s, until it succumbed to spam, porn, and advertisement corruption, like the rest of them.

              dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    44. Re:AltaVista by oobayly · · Score: 1

      Hmm, that's eerily identical to how I started using Google.

    45. Re:AltaVista by pne · · Score: 1

      Ah, the original babelfish link, http://babelfish.altavista.com./.

      Wasn't it originally at babelfish.altavista.digital.com before that?

      --
      Esli epei etot cumprenan, shris soa Sfaha.
    46. Re:AltaVista by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Of course, eventually Google turned into another advertisement-riddled, cluttered portal, full of spam and irrelevant junk. The more things change...

      Is google.com an "advertisement-riddled, cluttered portal, full of spam and irrelevant junk"?

      Yes, there's the toolbar of links at the top, but it's still very quick to load (and as someone else repeated long ago when I mentioned I go to google to see if my net connection is working, google is the dial tone of the web.)

      Since yahoo broke their news links (for many years, I've had links to business, tech, etc., sub-pages to news.yahoo.com and open them in tabs.. a few weeks ago, yahoo broke most of those), I've been trying google's news pages.. they don't work as well, since it expands the link with more detail even if you just cmd-click on it to open the article in another tab...

  3. at least we still have Dogpile and Ask Jeeves by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Funny

    You'll never make me use Google!

    1. Re:at least we still have Dogpile and Ask Jeeves by bonehead · · Score: 2

      We have ways!!!!

    2. Re:at least we still have Dogpile and Ask Jeeves by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      its no longer ask jeeves it just ask now and isn't that good compared to google in my humble opinion.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    3. Re:at least we still have Dogpile and Ask Jeeves by fermion · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget ask.com which is automatically installed with every Java update. If oracle supports it, and it works well with IE, it must be good.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:at least we still have Dogpile and Ask Jeeves by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      Oddly the UK version still uses the Ask Jeeves branding, though I think it's not actually different.

    5. Re:at least we still have Dogpile and Ask Jeeves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's probably because there are more people named "Jeeves" in the UK.

    6. Re:at least we still have Dogpile and Ask Jeeves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We have ways of making you talk...Siri

    7. Re:at least we still have Dogpile and Ask Jeeves by Tim+the+Gecko · · Score: 1

      That's probably because there are more people named "Jeeves" in the UK.

      It's the 5797th ranked name in Great Britain, and it looks like there are about 1500 "Jeeveses".

      In 1881, the year P.G. Wodehouse was born, they were mostly in Hertfordshire

    8. Re:at least we still have Dogpile and Ask Jeeves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UK version got changed to Ask.com branding for a long time, but they brought back the Ask Jeeves branding a few years ago, presumably due to popular demand, or surveys suggesting it would be preferred.

    9. Re:at least we still have Dogpile and Ask Jeeves by oobayly · · Score: 2

      Not for the plebs in my office. I keep finding the Ask toolbar and McAffee shite on [self employeed] brokers' computers - it turns out the update installers don't remember your preference - why would they, it would mean less installs.

  4. AltaVista user interface by roboticon · · Score: 1

    I know they use the same engine (Bing), but IMO AltaVista's results page seems more complete and intuitive than Yahoo's. For two equivalent searches, the AltaVista page has more similar searches, has more "more results from ...." links, and just seems tighter and more cohesive.

    1. Re:AltaVista user interface by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Yes but AltaVista just prior to google was an interesting search engine. Type in your query, wait for the results and then immediately skip to page 3 completely ignoring the first two pages, quick preview of page 3 and the skip to page 5 sometimes even page 7 before the results you were looking for actually started to showed up, MSN search was just as bad (part of the reason for the $ in M$).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  5. Is this confirmed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Has anyone asked Jeeves if it's true? That guy's a prodigy in his earth city (or geocity, if you will.)

  6. Running gag? by Molt · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you can only take so many years of being a running gag then can we look forward to Yahoo! pulling the plug on itself?

    --
    404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
    1. Re:Running gag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL is still around; the premise is simply wrong.

    2. Re:Running gag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine the noise that results as Yahoo!pullstheplug!outofYahoo!

  7. 'Google' Search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I did a search for "google" using it, just because I can be mean-spirited like that. But also I think there's probably some old guy out there who uses AltaVista as his home page because before his children abandon him they set that up for him and now it's abandoning him, too, but he's heard about this Google thing. Unfortunately, he thinks typing URLs and such into AltaVista is how the internet works. So he's leaving that search result up on his screen forever. Until the power goes out one fateful night, and he dies.

    1. Re:'Google' Search by some+old+guy · · Score: 1

      Or I need to make a beer run.

      -Some old guy.

      --
      Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
  8. bad link, evil link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    timothy... not only did you post an article with a bad link, but the site is blocked by MacAfee for having malware.

    1. Re:bad link, evil link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      link works fine, you are just infected with the McAfee Virus

    2. Re:bad link, evil link by shugah · · Score: 1

      Can I buy some mod points? Insightful.

      --
      If you aren't part of the solution, then there is good money to be made prolonging the problem
    3. Re:bad link, evil link by PrimeNumber · · Score: 1

      He keeps it around for the free bath salts.

    4. Re:bad link, evil link by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      the site is blocked by MacAfee for having malware.

      What's McAfee doing blocking your pipes when he's supposed to be on the run?

  9. Running gag by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Running gag" is a shame, they really were pioneers in the search engine business. For me the switch to Google was simply because it had (and still has) an uncluttered interface.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Running gag by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Hotbot, then Altavista. From then on, it's Googles all the way down.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Running gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lycos, Excite, Inktomi...

      Don't forget those AOL signup CD-ROM's (often >1) that fell out of the bags you brought home from CompUSA.

    3. Re:Running gag by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Inktomi was the power behind Hotbot. I never found Lycos or Excite to be useful, except when Lycos had an FTP search.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Running gag by adolf · · Score: 1

      ...which was another ftpsearch, at the time.

      I'm somewhat saddened when I look just now and find that all of my old ftpsearch sites are gone. But somewhat relieved when I realize that I really haven't needed them in a decade or so, which is why I didn't notice that they'd disappeared.

    5. Re:Running gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, then alltheweb, then google... ;)

    6. Re:Running gag by some+old+guy · · Score: 1

      I miss free AOL cd's...now I have to buy roadside mailbox reflectors and party coasters.

      --
      Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
    7. Re:Running gag by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 2

      Forget the FTP search engines, most of the old FTP sites are gone.

      I miss WUARCHIVE.WUSTL.EDU. I downloaded Doom from there...

    8. Re:Running gag by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      ftp://nic.funet.fi/ is still there. It's oh-my-god slow, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Running gag by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      if funet.fi is still around then sunsite.unc.edu probably is too.... ah yes, it's now called "ibiblio"

  10. Ahh Alta vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahh Alta Vista, you were my search engine of choice back in the 90's until Google came along.

    CRT's, floppy discs and 14,400 dial up modems...those were the days.... ...sigh

  11. Back in the Days of Kerosene Internet by rueger · · Score: 1

    Wow. Make me feel like an old timer! I used to love altavista - it was the absolute best there was.

    Now, wasn't it astavista that provided me with so much reasonably priced software?

    1. Re:Back in the Days of Kerosene Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Now, wasn't it astavista that provided me with so much reasonably priced software?

      No, it was www.astalavista.box.sk

    2. Re:Back in the Days of Kerosene Internet by rueger · · Score: 1

      That's it! Tempted to copy that into my browser but suspect it would be a VERY bad idea.

      Kids today have no idea how much you appreciate Photoshop when you've downloaded in one file using a dial-up modem.

    3. Re:Back in the Days of Kerosene Internet by TClevenger · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Warez do you want to go today?"

    4. Re:Back in the Days of Kerosene Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who downloads 1 big file...You have to download like 80 .part zip files (each at 1.38mb!) and hope the files don't become corrupted.

    5. Re:Back in the Days of Kerosene Internet by Skiron · · Score: 1

      And on dial-up, that used to take about 6 minutes per 1mb zip file, and always when the download reached 99% the dreaded 'click - Purrrrrrrrrrr' of the modem disconnecting happened, so you would have to download it all again after dialling up again.

      Used to take days to get big files.

    6. Re:Back in the Days of Kerosene Internet by chihowa · · Score: 1

      And on dial-up, that used to take about 6 minutes per 1mb zip file, and always when the download reached 99% the dreaded 'click - Purrrrrrrrrrr' of the modem disconnecting happened, so you would have to download it all again after dialling up again.

      Used to take days to get big files.

      That reminds me of how awesome zmodem was with its resume capability. That changed things for the better. Then we moved on to http and lost resume for the longest time again...

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  12. Used to use it, it was the best by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    In its heyday, it was the best.

  13. alta la vista, baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its last words were "I'll be back".

  14. I say ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... we all start using it and see if Yahoo changes their mind.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  15. This still exists...? by agapeton · · Score: 0

    I'm about as surprised to find out this was still around as I was last week when I found out SVN still existed. Don't tell me ColdFusion is still on the market...

    1. Re:This still exists...? by epyT-R · · Score: 1
    2. Re:This still exists...? by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      I have a subscriber still using a webtv.com email address. Bizarre. He's in his 70s, crusty old war vet.

      --
      I come here for the love
    3. Re: This still exists...? by jbo5112 · · Score: 1

      I still occasionally see software on cvs.

    4. Re:This still exists...? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      the service is still up? (former webtv user from 99 to 02). Older webtv accounts are .net...the .com came a bit later.

      I liked how it handled USENET. It does IRC too, though WebTV users can only be in one channel at a time and can't use advanced commands directly.

  16. so long. I learned SEO on altavista & launched by raymorris · · Score: 1

    So long and thanks for all the fish, Altavista.
    I first learned search engine optimization by studying Alatavista, then moved on to Hotbot (Inktomi).
    That was the beginning of a great business, and my first good paying job.

  17. Ah the memories by Coppit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember back in the day AltaVista was the only search engine which allowed you to use + and - to fine-tune the results. Before Google's pagerank that was the best you could hope for.

    1. Re:Ah the memories by tomp · · Score: 1

      It's still the best you could hope for. Sure wish Google still had that technology.

      If my search criteria isn't on the page, I don't want to see it. Can't google get some of that cutting edge 90's tech back? They have smart people, right?

    2. Re:Ah the memories by siride · · Score: 1

      You can use '-' on Google searches.

    3. Re:Ah the memories by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      I remember back in the day AltaVista was the only search engine which allowed you to use + and - to fine-tune the results. Before Google's pagerank that was the best you could hope for.

      I remember back in the day when Google was a search engine that actually responded correctly to + and - to fine-tune results, and when Google even listened to the actual words you typed, rather than replacing them with what it thinks are synonyms or sometimes random words that have nothing to do with what I'm searching for.

      I gave up using Google over a year ago because it had become so hard to get it to actually search for the exact words I type, instead of having it try to guess what I mean.

      If I wanted my computer to try to make wild guesses about what I was trying to do instead of doing what I ask, I'd reinstall Office 95 and spend my days in dialog with Clippy.

    4. Re:Ah the memories by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Sorry - I meant Office 97.

    5. Re:Ah the memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And +

    6. Re:Ah the memories by tomp · · Score: 2

      Yea, but it doesn't work. Google simply isn't able to do text searches anymore. They can return as many fast half-assed results as I can stand, but not one single accurate result.

      Wanna get a list of pages that don't contain the test altavist? Simple just search for -altavista. Yea, doesn't work.

    7. Re:Ah the memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      uhm, use quotes?

    8. Re:Ah the memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't work. Try it.

    9. Re:Ah the memories by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Now there's a thought. If Google could support strict regex, totally excluding non-matches, that would be really cool. Though I admit it's not something I would ever be likely to teach my parents...

    10. Re:Ah the memories by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I gave up using Google over a year ago

      As a matter of interest: ...and replaced it with what? Google isn't what it was, but I haven't found anything nearly as good.

    11. Re:Ah the memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It made me switch when 'did you mean ___?' turned into 'we're going to assume you meant ___, and show you results for ___, but click here to tell us we're right.'

    12. Re:Ah the memories by siride · · Score: 1

      Also something that would be computationally intensive compared to what they do now, and only of value in limited circumstances. It could be done, but probably isn't worth it.

    13. Re:Ah the memories by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      It would indeed be computationally intensive, but most people have to put a bit of effort into crafting an effective regular expression, and since the majority of people are lazy, Google's servers would be unlikely to be overloaded with requests at any single time.

      In fact, this need not necessarily even be done in real-time. An approach could be for the user to submit the request, and Google could email back the results when it has sufficient resources to process it. Nothing wrong with taking a step backwards to the batch-mode processing of my earlier career, when this could actually save time. This would also mitigate or obviate any effects of some miscreant using this in an attempt to DDOS Google.

      After all, Google is supposedly big on producing "beautiful technology", and this could be pretty neat.

    14. Re:Ah the memories by speederaser · · Score: 1

      Simple just search for -altavista. Yea, doesn't work.

      That's because you negated your entire search string. Try "search -altavista". Works just fine, no altavista results.

    15. Re:Ah the memories by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Heck, make it a subscription service.

    16. Re:Ah the memories by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      it most certainly does work, you're doing something wrongly.

      http://www.googleguide.com/advanced_operators_reference.html

    17. Re: Ah the memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just want the world's most expensive grep. Google gives most people what they expect. If you want expensive grep, then put your search terms in quotes.

  18. better idea by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Just put the AltaVisa domain on top of Yahoo Search with an AltaVista logo. Old users won't know the diff. Why kill off a few thousand customers for lack of a logo?

    1. Re:better idea by arielCo · · Score: 1

      They did precisely that in 2003 or 2004, after the acquisition. If you didn't notice the loss of functionality, you were using it wrong.

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  19. I totally remember altavista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It was the only search engine that allowed very specific +/- combos. I remember it being better in that respect than Google is now (although Google was vastly better returning correct results when it came on the scene).

    1. Re:I totally remember altavista by labyrinth · · Score: 2

      Didn't it also have the option to do a search and then do a second search within the results of the first one?

    2. Re:I totally remember altavista by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Actually, HotBot was really pretty damn good at refining searches. And, (perhaps surprisingly) so was Excite for a while. I found taking the time to look carefully at their advanced search gave me pretty good results from most of them, depending on what I was looking for.

      Having said that, what I often used to do first was put more general terms into Dogpile and let its shotgun approach do the work.

    3. Re:I totally remember altavista by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Yes! How I loved that.

  20. Alternatives... by akh · · Score: 2

    Looks like it's back to using the alternative.

    --
    Accept Eris as your Fnord and personally sate her
  21. Lycos? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Lycos anyone?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  22. Infoseek? by approachingZero+ · · Score: 1

    Anyone else use Infoseek?

    --
    'I don't know what it's called. I just know the sound it makes, when it takes a man's life.' ~ Four Leaf Tayback
  23. Excite is still around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a full-blown Web Portal to boot!

    1. Re: Excite is still around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excite.com has one of the worst webmail interfaces imaginable. Some java craplet that has sponsors" that you must click past. It's also large/complex enough to make the fans on my computer kick on.

      I was using it to create a throwaway, I later found out they do not retire/release abandoned email addresses.

  24. Altavista - remembered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I remember AV, from the early to mid 1990's. It was pretty much irrelevant by the late 90's.A product of DEC (long before DEC was acquired by HP), it COULD have been Google if DEC had half a brain regarding the Internet. Too bad - I really liked DEC hardware and software (Ultrix, VAX, Tru64 Unix, etc). Once HP bought DEC - into the dump it went! :-( In any case, it did show what you could do with web searches. Innovative, and ahead of its time - two damning attributes for a new software paradigm!

  25. Hasta la AltaVista, baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I remember when they had the only decent directory and search engine on the Internet. Seems like an eternity ago.

    Farewell, AltaVista.

  26. Arnie Says... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1, Funny

    Alta la vista Baby!

    Or something like that...

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:Arnie Says... by oobayly · · Score: 1
  27. Ping Tests by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    For years now, when checking for DNS resolution and basic Internet connectivity from whatever network I'm in, my first quick test has been "ping altavista.com". Year after year, I trusted that if the Internet connection was working, I'd get a response. Altavista never let me down :)

  28. altavista.digital.com by linebackn · · Score: 2

    I remember when the original URL was http://altavista.digital.com/

    In the early days it even recognized Pathworks Mosaic 1.0 by its user agent, and served up a really, really simple HTML page just for it.

    There was even a Personal version of the search engine that you could download and run on your own server to index your Intranets.

    Sad to see it go because the world really needs more diversity when it comes to search engines. If there is something the Big Engines don't want you to have, it might as well not exist.

  29. good stuff by RedHackTea · · Score: 1

    Had best image/video search first, and their "free" dial-up was great.

    --
    The G
  30. From the for what it's worth department... by tlambert · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember back in the day AltaVista was the only search engine which allowed you to use + and - to fine-tune the results. Before Google's pagerank that was the best you could hope for.

    From the for what it's worth department... when Google dropped the ability to force inclusion of specific search terms, which was shortly before it introduced Google+, it was incredibly contentious inside Google itself, and a lot of Google employees at the time, myself included, complained bitterly about the ability to get accurate results any more.

    Most of use were natural lexicographers who could think hierarchically enough that we knew the search terms we wanted in order to get the results we wanted. surprising how we ended up working at a search engine, right? About 2/3rds of us really felt they were "dumbing down" search in order to use the same datastores for normal search as the first and second order relationships being used to generate targetted advertising results. Altavista was mentioned *a lot*.

    1. Re:From the for what it's worth department... by psychonaut · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Google never dropped the ability to force inclusion of specific search terms; they just changed the syntax without telling anyone. Before you had to prepend a + to any term you wanted to include in the results. Now you instead need to surround the term with quotation marks.

    2. Re:From the for what it's worth department... by twosat · · Score: 1

      AltaVista was the first web searcher that I used. When Google came out I gradually switched to it because it gave me much more relevant results. I could make much more sophisticated searches using AltaVista's Boolean grammar, and it also allowed wild-cards for the ends of words. Alas, the wild-card feature did not seem to work when I tried it out again a few years ago.

    3. Re:From the for what it's worth department... by SigmundFloyd · · Score: 1

      And its "NEAR" operator allowed me to fine-tune the results in ways unmatched even by today's search engines.

      Parentheses, boolean operators, the NEAR operator... Altavista was the true hacker's choice for powerful web search. We don't lose it today, though: We lost it when it was turned into a rebranded Yahoo.

      Anyway, the "running gag" comment just goes to show how low this place has sunk.

      --
      Knowledge is power; knowledge shared is power lost.
    4. Re:From the for what it's worth department... by tlambert · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If I want to search for exact words in any order, "A" "B" "C" is NOT the same as +A +B +C was, since it doesn't force inclusion. Instead I get ""best" and "useful" results, rather than results based on my judgement.

      This is great for most people, who don't know how search engines work, don't care, or are just looking for sponsored results or porn, but it's not that useful to, for example, get results containing technical reports and papers in a particular field (for example). For CS, there's citeseer searching, but for biology and other fields, it's a real pain.

    5. Re:From the for what it's worth department... by arielCo · · Score: 1

      It's been a sad joke since Yahoo ripped out the search engine with the operators and wildcards and parentheses, and made it a front end for Yahoo's. That was maybe a year after the acquisition (2003).

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    6. Re:From the for what it's worth department... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, wrong, wrong. I have tons of examples where + and "" completely fail to work. Fuck those stupid assholes.

    7. Re:From the for what it's worth department... by MyHair · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm still ticked off that I can't force term searches anymore. Google does really well most of the time, but sometimes I need a particular word or the exclusion of a particular word, and Google doesn't obey anymore.

    8. Re:From the for what it's worth department... by oobayly · · Score: 1

      There's Google's "Verbatim tool". However it's a ballache to use, and I can't see a simple way of using it by default, other than modifying the querystring in Chrome.

  31. Asta Lavista by future+assassin · · Score: 4, Funny

    baby.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Asta Lavista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      baby.

      That's a funny way to say .box.sk, Ahnold :)

    2. Re:Asta Lavista by eneville · · Score: 0

      Someone mod parent funny :)

  32. Spam Problem with Altavista? by PastTense · · Score: 1

    Didn't Altavista develop a major problem with spam? You search for almost anything and porn sites were among the top items returned?

    It seems that was a major reason which I switched to Google--which was in Beta at the time--and still in Beta several years later.

  33. Sock Puppet by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    But it's the only search engine that returns results for "Sock Puppet"

  34. Where it all began by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    AltaVista was a huge innovation. Nobody at the time thought that someone could provide a search service for the entire internet for free. DEC rented the old vacant telephone building behind the Walgreens in downtown Palo Alto. (That building now houses the Palo Alto Internet Exchange, which at one time was the major Silicon Valley switching node for the Internet.) They installed DEC Alpha rack-mounted machines. The whole thing was a demo of DEC Alpha technology, to show that a large number of DEC machines could do things no mainframe could.

    That was a huge change from previous data center construction. Until then, most data centers had raised floors and nice cabinets. Telephone central offices, though, had tall open racks firmly bolted to the building, with cable trays overhead. AltaVista was the first big data center built that way. Telcos were better at cable management than computer services in those days. Using telco-style cable management turned out to be a huge win.

    1. Re:Where it all began by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nobody at the time thought that someone could provide a search service for the entire internet for free.

      Except OpenText/Yahoo who did it a year earlier.

      They installed DEC Alpha rack-mounted machines.

      No they didn't. They had a single massive DEC Alpha Server with some untold number of GB of RAM, which at the time was unprecedented. Using racks of machines was an idea developed later by Eric Brewer from Excite.

      The whole thing was a demo of DEC Alpha technology, to show that a large number of DEC machines could do things no mainframe could.

      It was released as a demo of what a single AlphaServer machine could do. The project started by people who thought "wouldn't it be cool if..." and then the marketing droids released it as a demo. The single machine architecture bottlenecked their index size by the way. The entire architecture relied on being on main memory on a single machine and when the web grew faster that the amount of RAM available they didn't know what to do.

  35. yea I do remember by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    it was the only search engine at the time that let you do +- stuff and return even less meaningful results

    next we are going to have a candlelight service for lycos?

    1. Re:yea I do remember by weav · · Score: 1

      next we are going to have a candlelight service for lycos?

      Who even owns Lycos any more? Last I heard Telefonica sold them off to some Korean investors who shut the place down to minimal size.
      Whowhere (which they acquired to get MailCity, which became Lycos Mail) still exists but I can't imagine what people database it searches.

  36. With a name like AltaVista it was always doomed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Let me AltaVista that for you" just doesn't roll off the tongue like Google does.

    Maybe that's Yahoo's problem too.

  37. noisy line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In those days, the best I could do was a 26.4Kbps dial-up connection ...

    That's an odd bit rate. I'm guessing you had a noisy line?

  38. Good webmail client too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the day they were a good webmail client too. They used to have a number of TLDs to choose from. After they were bought out by compaq and then hp though the mail service went to shit and eventually ended up being part of mail.com. I still miss my pyrus@earthling.net address though.

  39. Stop using those search engines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop using those search engines, almost every search goes to some databases, get your self together and start using your own search engine, you control the search, yacy.net

  40. And what about babelfish.altavista.com by allo · · Score: 1

    The best translator ever?

  41. Subject bar is for the *subject*! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at least we still have Dogpile and Ask Jeeves

    You'll never make me use Google!

    Er, I honestly can't figure out if that was a "whoosh" going past, but you do realise that Dogpile is just a meta search engine that uses Google's results amongst others?

  42. Verbatim searches with google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy fix for that. You want to enable verbatim mode with google. Click "search tools" then the "all results" drop down menu, then click Verbatim. Google will no longer try and use synonyms.