Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft To Add Ads To Smart Search

Vanderhoth writes "Today, Microsoft said its advertisers will be able to target users not just on Web search results pages but directly inside Windows Smart Search. David Pann, general manager of Microsoft's Search Advertising Group, said in an interview that advertisers don't have to do additional setup to participate. The Smart Search ads will feature a preview of the websites the ad will send people to, as well as click-to-call info and site links, which are additional links under the main result that direct users deeper into a website to the most likely page they might want."

15 of 169 comments (clear)

  1. LOL! by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is Microsoft trying deliberately to lose its customers?

  2. Ads added post-purchase? by omnichad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Any time ads are added to a purchased program or device post-purchase, you can expect a big backlash.

  3. Re:As if Windows8 wasn't having enough problems by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What makes you think that was not the idea all along?

    Have you seen Xbox home?

  4. Ugh by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While this seems like a good idea to MS and advertisers, I don't want Bing ads when I'm searching on things inside my machine or to let MS know about the searches I'm doing on my own files. I also can't see that enterprises want this feature turned on. For example if you are working on a proposal to expand your company's presence in a particular Asian country next year but can't find the document that you saved earlier, do you want MS to send information to advertisers about expansion in that country? What if they proposal shouldn't be divulged yet to people inside the company much less to people outside of the company.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Ugh by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Worse: where I work we're subject to regulatory requirements about data disclosure. Having an external entity (Microsoft) be made aware of what we're doing before it's officially disclosed is a violation of Federal securities regulations. Having an external entity be made aware of private consumer credit information (which I work with regularly) is a violation of Federal privacy, consumer-protection and banking laws. The day this goes in, there's going to be a directive from Legal come down: this feature must be disabled completely or we must cease using Windows.

    2. Re:Ugh by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed.

      If your local search had a button to "also search online" after local results were found and that online search returned ads, that'd be one thing -- its just another interface to an internet search engine and we pretty much expect ads.

      But to automaticlly push local search online is bad enough, to return ads with that is just demented.

        Nobody wants this. Absolutely Nobody.

  5. Just copying. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ubuntu did it first.

    1. Re:Just copying. by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Also, didn't Ubuntu add an option to opt-out of the advertising after the backlash?

      yup they did, also they anonymised the searches as i recall from the forbes article a ms exec is quoted as saying;

      The goal, is to give advertisers access to consumers across a broader variety of their daily activities, not just when they’re overtly conducting a search.

      so they are not only seeing you search but from a detailed analysis of you computer daily usage.
      they are literally baking adware and spyware into their core OS.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  6. How to commit suicide, by Microsoft by Progman3K · · Score: 4, Funny

    We visit a Microsoft boardroom, where execs are discussing their future plans

    Exec 1: Hey, I've got an idea, you know how on that android-y thingy, you can download free apps but to make their money back on them, the developers serve ads? Why don't we do that?

    Exec 2: You mean serve people ads with software they've already paid for???

    Exec1: Yeah!

    Exec 3: Genius! Let's break for lunch!

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  7. dont get scroogled by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hey MS. Targeted ads, pot, kettle, black something or other. Sigh.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  8. Re:Douchebags! by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Even before XBone's DRM clusterfuck, they'd guaranteed I wouldn't buy their next-gen crapbox the moment they put ads on my Xbox dashboard...

    Yeah, that was what prompted me to disconnect mine from the network too, and even though they've backed down and require only one-time, I'm still not buying the new one.

    But if Microsoft is going to start doing this stuff in the core OS, they're really going to further piss off their customers. The last thing I want is advertising embedded in the OS -- because you pretty much have to conclude the OS is spying on you.

    In doing this, Windows has more or less become something you simply can't trust, because those advertising hooks will pretty much be into everything.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  10. HIPAA and many other laws/regulations by fallen1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    guarantees that Windows 8 / 8.1 will NEVER be utilized inside the medical field. I was already looking to have to explain to my bosses why we should not buy laptops with Windows 8 on them and this just sealed the deal for me -- HIPAA violations start at $50,000 per and go up to $150,000 per. Anything "analyzing" searches on our computer systems or networks is right out.

    Thank you, Microsoft, for making my job as an administrator that much easier! It has now become so that recommending Microsoft CAN get you fired.

    --

    Dream as if you'll live forever.
    Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
    ~Anonymous~

  11. Re:Douchebags! by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Funny

    Learn from them? They seem intent on duplicating them, but with even sloppier implementation. That's where the whole "tablet UI on the desktop" trend of idiocy started, too.

    Maybe I'm just coming of "get off my lawn" age, but it's getting rather depressing, just how hard it is to avoid this sort of fuckwittery these days...

  12. Re:As if Windows8 wasn't having enough problems by JDG1980 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think you nailed it. "Welp, we expected a huge backlash for running ads on our paid service that Sony gives away for free... but somehow we got away with it! Let's do the bait and switch with our desktop market and see how well it works there"

    Apparently they didn't consider that what the gaming demographic is willing to put up with, serious businesses might not be. Gamers don't have to worry about HIPAA, PCI, SOX, or other privacy/security requirements.

    There's got to be some group policy setting to disable this 'smart search' and its corresponding ads, and have the search tool conduct local searches only. (Group policy editing is available only in Pro, but you can generally get the same results on the Home version by manually setting a corresponding registry key.) Even this management team at Microsoft couldn't be dumb enough to not realize that businesses need an opt-out. Could they?