Slashdot Mirror


Norwegian Town Using Sun-Tracking Mirrors To Light Up Dark Winter Days

oritonic1 writes "During their long, cold winters, the Norwegian town of Rjukan doesn't enjoy much by way of daylight—so the town (population 3,386), installed three giant sun-tracking mirrors to shine a steady light over a 2000 square foot circle of the town square. From Popular Mechanics: 'Call it a mood enhancer. Or a tourist attraction. But the mirrors, which will be carried in via helicopter, will provide an oasis of light in an otherwise bleak location at the center of the 3500-population town. Three mirrors with a total surface area of about 538 square feet will sit at an angle to redirect winter sun down into the town, lighting up over 2150 square feet of concentrated space in the town square. A similar idea exists in the Italian village of Viganella, which has used brushed steel to reflect light since 2006.'"

143 comments

  1. It didn't work out well by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Informative

    It didn't work out well in Lord Parker's 'Oliday.

    1. Re:It didn't work out well by necro81 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I just don't get it! So in winter this town is in almost perpetual night? So what the fuck are these mirrors going to reflect moonlight???

      Switch to decaf and chill out. The town is not in perpetual night. At about 60 degrees north latitude, that's impossible. However, because it is situated in a deep valley that runs east-west, it is in the shadow of the surrounding mountains for five months out of the year.

      (This I was able to find out with about 30 seconds' research - about as long as it took for you to dismiss these people as idiots and write your short-sighted post.)

    2. Re:It didn't work out well by LurkingSince1999 · · Score: 1, Funny

      The city planners should have thought about this before deciding to put the town there. Now they're having to use public money to fix their short-sightedness!

    3. Re:It didn't work out well by slashmydots · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Precisely. It'd be much easier to just destroy the mountain than this silly idea. I think Russia has some pretty big nukes.

    4. Re:It didn't work out well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just don't get it!

      As a wise friend of mine is rather fond of saying, "Google it up, you ignorant bastard."

    5. Re:It didn't work out well by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

      The city planners choose the location because the mountains made it a good defensible location in the middle ages. The town has been there for a long time.

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    6. Re:It didn't work out well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      The city planners should have thought about this before deciding to put the town there. Now they're having to use public money to fix their short-sightedness!

      Oh the horror! Using public money for public good! You'd almost think they formed a government and collected taxes to serve the people.

      Your tea has steeped way too long son.

    7. Re:It didn't work out well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Typing North American idiot. Most European citys (and towns) have been where they are for centuries, even millenia.

    8. Re:It didn't work out well by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The city planners should have thought about this before deciding to put the town there.

      I can vividly see you confronting the city planners and getting dismissed not only with a nice REJECTED rubber stamp in runic script stamped on your petition, but also with a nice complimentary blood eagle.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:It didn't work out well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good defensible location would have been on top of the mountains or ridges, not in the valleys between.

    10. Re:It didn't work out well by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The city planners should have thought about this before deciding to put the town there.

      Do you know how most cities got sited? Availability of water, good harbors (very important historically), workable land and other needed resources.

      There is almost never a set of city planners that sit down and weigh all the pros and cons of a location ... they just tend to initially happen as people find what they need and start laying down roots.

      If you live in the North, you take what you can get. These guys are just trying to improve a little on that.

      Washington DC used to be a malarial swamp and New Orleans is apparently below sea level. Did the city planners do a piss-poor job? Or were there other features that made it desirable?

      Nobody comes along and says "we're going to build a thriving city here" -- well, China has apparently done it, and they're empty. I suspect most cities started in a much more random and organic manner.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    11. Re:It didn't work out well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woooow. See post below.

    12. Re:It didn't work out well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Orleans isn't completely below sea level. Over time the city expanded in to flood zones which was dumb, but due to a few decades with out bad storms or floods everyone thought it was safe. Most of historical new Orleans is above sea level, just not by much.

    13. Re:It didn't work out well by MrHanky · · Score: 1, Informative

      Absolutely and totally wrong. The town was chosen for access to cheap hydroelectric power in the early 20th century, and a deep valley would be a terrible defensive location.

      You're an idiot.

    14. Re:It didn't work out well by mdielmann · · Score: 2

      The city planners should have thought about this before deciding to put the town there.

      Do you know how most cities got sited? Availability of water, good harbors (very important historically), workable land and other needed resources.

      There is almost never a set of city planners that sit down and weigh all the pros and cons of a location ... they just tend to initially happen as people find what they need and start laying down roots.

      If you live in the North, you take what you can get. These guys are just trying to improve a little on that.

      Washington DC used to be a malarial swamp and New Orleans is apparently below sea level. Did the city planners do a piss-poor job? Or were there other features that made it desirable?

      Nobody comes along and says "we're going to build a thriving city here" -- well, China has apparently done it, and they're empty. I suspect most cities started in a much more random and organic manner.

      This doesn't mean decisions weren't made based on the viability of a given location. If you think about it, the very definition of a thriving city is a location where a large number of people have thought it was worth living there. "Planned cities" are places where a few people thought it was worth living there, and the data tends to show they were wrong.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    15. Re:It didn't work out well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      brasilia

    16. Re:It didn't work out well by LurkingSince1999 · · Score: 0

      Wow... Yes, I know how most cities got sited. Apparently your humor detector needs recalibrating. And having spend 20 years in DC, I would argue that it's still a malarial swamp (That's a humorous reference to Congress and politicians in general)

  2. I am glad I don't have to do this... by bogaboga · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...I live along the equator where our days and nights ar "equal" throughout the year.

    Trouble is that most Europeans I have met on my travels think it's hot hot hot at the equator, which isn't the case. In fact, their summers, which are responsible for some deaths among the elderly and young ones, are way hotter than the hottest day at home.

    When I say this, they won't believe it until I remind them that we are at a higher elevation which is cooler...just like the clouds.

    1. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...I live along the equator where our days and nights ar "equal" throughout the year.

      I am glad to live in a place (Central Europe) where there are seasons, and not the same thing all over the year.

    2. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's wrong in so many different ways...
      http://www.yr.no/observasjonar/statistikk.html 20c and extremely seldom >25c.. if that's "way hotter than the hottest day at home".. well...

    3. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by Prokur · · Score: 0

      apparently you live in Bogota or another Latin city, where you face many other troubles regarding deaths among the elderly and young ones.

    4. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Rjukan isn't all that far to the North, but it's located in a deep valley, with mountains on every side. When the sun gets low in the Winter, the town is in constant shade.

    5. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am glad to live in a place (Central Europe) where there are seasons, and not the same thing all over the year.

      As someone who spent the first 20 years of his life in an area without significant seasonal changes and the next 20 years in areas with major seasonal changes I can definitely say that seasons are vastly overrated.

      Having near perfect weather every day is about the least horrible curse I can think of.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by RivenAleem · · Score: 5, Funny

      As someone living in Ireland, I can tell you the lack of seasons isn't restricted to the equatorial areas.

    7. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. With two options:

      1) The season of storm but mostly rain, the season of freezing rock-solid but mostly snow, the season of a bit sun but mostly rain, and the season of sweating like a pig and thunderstorms. (Eastern-European model.)
      2) The season of storm but mostly rain, the season of more rain but mostly rain, the season of annoyingly light rain but mostly rain, and the season of rain with the occasional -bow. (British model.)

    8. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by Arrepiadd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As someone who spent the first 20 years of his life in an area without significant seasonal changes and the next 20 years in areas with major seasonal changes I can definitely say that seasons are vastly overrated.

      Having near perfect weather every day is about the least horrible curse I can think of.

      Except that being next to equator does not guarantee "near perfect weather". Plenty of friends from places close to equator just say "back home we carried an umbrella every day even if it only rained once a week, because when it did it was pouring really hard.

      And to further counter your example, the more artistic oriented among those friends, even after years of being in a place with significant seasonal changes really appreciate contrast of green summer bursting with activity and people vs the white winter of cold and quiet. Different people for different things, I guess.

    9. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by DrXym · · Score: 2

      Well Ireland did have a summer for once this year although it's pissing it down at this moment.

    10. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am glad I am not a foreigner, too. No one likes foreigners!

    11. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by txibi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Having near perfect weather every day is about the least horrible curse I can think of.

      It depends on what you understand by nearly perfect weather. The nearly perfect weather to practice ski is not the same one that you need for swimming in the sea... For this I like having seasons on where I live and being able to practice different sports depending on the season.

    12. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      As someone living in my parents basement, I can tell you the lack of seasons isn't restricted to the equatorial areas.

    13. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by dkf · · Score: 2

      Rjukan isn't all that far to the North

      While it's not that far north for Norway (where it's in the south of the country), it's still nearly 60N. In any reasonable terms, that's still a long way north; you have to go pretty much to the Antarctic peninsula to get an equivalent distance south. Heck, the axial diameter that far north is only half that of the equator...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    14. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Consistancy is key.

      Here in the southern UK, it snows sometimes. Not a lot. Maybe for a week, no more, and only every two years - often we go a winter with no snow at all, or just a very light dusting.

      When it does snow, everything stops. Roads are impassible, schools close, almost total shutdown of the country. Why? Because we don't keep an army of ploughs and gritters and a big stockpile of salt around for something that happens so rarely and is over so quickly.

      Likewise with very hot summers. The crushing heat can reach thirty celcius. In somewhere like the southern US they'd laugh at that - but in those places, everyone is used to it, with buildings made to stay cool and every home fitted with air-con. We melt for about a week a year, so we just endure - the awkwardness is over too soon to justify building houses that stay cool (And thus cost a lot more to heat in winter) or installing expensive aircon systems.

    15. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry that was me :)

    16. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by Trepidity · · Score: 0

      Well, it was wrong about the roll-call, anyway. It was posted within an hour or so, which is exactly where that Slashdot comment got the tally.

      Here's every roll call vote this Congressional session, from the Library of Congress. And here is the one you're thinking of.

    17. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by dj245 · · Score: 4, Informative

      We melt for about a week a year, so we just endure - the awkwardness is over too soon to justify building houses that stay cool (And thus cost a lot more to heat in winter) .....

      Buildings that stay cool in summer and are warm in winter are not mutually exclusive. Presenting them as conflicting design goals is silly considering that these design goals are often complementary.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    18. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by jittles · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As someone who spent the first 20 years of his life in an area without significant seasonal changes and the next 20 years in areas with major seasonal changes I can definitely say that seasons are vastly overrated.

      Having near perfect weather every day is about the least horrible curse I can think of.

      Except that being next to equator does not guarantee "near perfect weather". Plenty of friends from places close to equator just say "back home we carried an umbrella every day even if it only rained once a week, because when it did it was pouring really hard.

      Huh. I didn't know people in tropical areas bothered with umbrellas. I lived about 10 degrees north of the equator for a year. Yeah it rained like hell, and an umbrella was useless. Either the rain would come in sideways, or come in so hard and so fast you had to worry more about the water coming up than the water going down. I've seen rocks about half the size of a bowling ball being carried down the gutters along with lawn chairs and everything else you can imagine during an especially strong rain. But contrary to popular belief, most tropical areas do have two seasons: the wet season and the dry season. Where I lived, it rained almost every day for hours on end during the wet season. During the dry season, it may rain for 10 minutes each day, or may not rain for several days.

    19. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by jbengt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The crushing heat can reach thirty celcius. In somewhere like the southern US they'd laugh at that

      30C (86F) is stifling heat? We laugh at that in the Northern US. True, it would be a little uncomfortable indoors without A/C or at least good ventilation, but you would have to start talking at least 35C or maybe 40C before making US southerners uncomfortable outside. (OK, you'd have to talk 95F to 104F, since they would mostly just look at you funny and wonder what planet you're from if you talk Celsius.)

    20. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by h3st · · Score: 1

      The problem with Rjukan isn't so much the seasons as the fact that it's in the bottom of a steep valley. So part of the day the sun is shining on one mountainside, then a short period where sunshine reaches the town, and then the other mountainside gets sun. Having a similar town near the equator could be better or worse, depending on the axis of the valley.

      --
      hei katter
    21. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      Any ideas on why we are reading about Norwegians tracking the sun when the following article now sits on the third page of the submissions Firehose?

      "NSA Still Funded to Spy On US Phone Records,Vote Fails

      Yes, there are several things tied into that. You read and post on stories on the main page, not stories in the submission queue. Even if that story was on the front page, I would still be reading and posting in this story because it interests me as it does the other people reading and posting in this story. Not every story has to be about the NSA. You also seem to overlook the fact that many Europeans and citizens of other countries would have limited interest in votes for purely domestic American policy as that vote was. There had already been a story on the vote two days ago when it could still have influence. The information in the story you refer to was incomplete, as I recall, and the vote was over so the story couldn't influence events anyway. The defense bill is on its way to the Senate. There will have to be a separate bill and lobbying performed to get the amendment passed on its own merits as a bill.

      Based on your UID I know you aren't new here, so you know how things work. Could there be another reason why this baffles you?

      Oh, that's right, you think the staff are NSA plants, and me as well, as you make clear repeatedly (just 1 more of many for demonstration and brevity).

      I hope you get a grip at some point. Now, can we get back to this interesting story with no further outbursts from you about the NSA or "forum breakers" and forum spies? Please?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    22. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Any ideas on why we are reading about Norwegians tracking the sun when the following article now sits on the third page of the submissions Firehose?

      Because fuck you, that's why. You don't have the right to insist on what others should find interesting.

    23. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by geirlk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't forget to factor in the warmth of the Gulf stream. It is what makes Norway liveable, even though we're so far north.

    24. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here in Finland, official "hot" figure for weather is at 27C. And yes, when it's 27C, it's exhausting hot.

      On the other hand, -27C is nice weather to go out and ski/skate. And most buildings do not have A/C because there's no real reason to - the season during which you would need it lasts days if it ever comes at all.

    25. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We melt for about a week a year, so we just endure - the awkwardness is over too soon to justify building houses that stay cool (And thus cost a lot more to heat in winter) or installing expensive aircon systems.

      This isn't quite right. American houses may have AC, lots do, but nothern states may be limited to a couple of window boxes in the bedrooms. Older housing, and poor areas in the south might be limited to these systems too. Furthermore, insulation works both ways. Engllish houses today are pretty good at keeping heat in, and vice versa. The problem with weeks of 30C in England is that the people don't know how to handle it and try to continue as normal without taking on extra precaughtions and extra water. It's basically the infirm and weak that are dying. English houses are also being built with small AC units today, and you can buy semi-portable systems for less than a grand. Most mordern commercial building have AC as standard too.

      For what it's worth, insulation in the southern states is generally pretty shit. Builders don't understand it, their attitude is "it's always warm, the house has AC". They're only put R30 in the attics (up north they can have R100) and they don't install double glazed windows and doors that seal properly. Power bills in the winter and summer can easily hit $300/month in an average 200sqrm house, and go higher if the family hasn't made any effort. Even in Florida, heating may be required in the late winter. Frosts are very common, snow may fall in the northern counties, but the houses are limited to one big hot air blower built into the AC and a single, mostly cosmetic, fireplace in the largest room. FL houses are generally open plan, single level and have high or vaulted ceilings. I.e. heating the living areas costs a fortune.

    26. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      30C (86F) is stifling heat? We laugh at that in the Northern US. True, it would be a little uncomfortable indoors without A/C or at least good ventilation, but you would have to start talking at least 35C or maybe 40C before making US southerners uncomfortable outside. (OK, you'd have to talk 95F to 104F, since they would mostly just look at you funny and wonder what planet you're from if you talk Celsius.)

      Depends on the location and average temperatures - take that same southerner and put them on the US-Canada border and they'd probably freeze while everyone else goes about their daily business.

      Even here in Canada A/C is optional - most houses have heating, but cooling is optional. Of course, it also gets to be 28-30C in the summer (or higher - 35C isn't unusual for a week), and without A/C, at that it's considered unbearable. Especially indoors when you have to shut your windows as well (because it doesn't cool off until 11pm at night).

    27. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I find absolutely laughable is that apparently they're cooking and dying in droves back in the old country, while I see them everyday here in southern Portugal (Algarve) going about their business drunk as a bloody skunk, shirtless, wearing a very skin-cancer-like shade of well-cooked-lobster-red, in the 4 o'clock 40C, no problem. There are literally hundreds if not thousands of brits around these parts in July/August, and they all seem to cope well with the heat. Meanwhilte, back home the temps rise to 28C and oooh, the sky is falling. A few weeks ago there was a massive heat wave here, not very far from Algarve, in Alentejo, temps were in the 45 C region for over a week straight.

      PS: I'm a brit, though I havent set foot in Salford in 18 years.

    28. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      When I say this, they won't believe it until I remind them that we are at a higher elevation which is cooler

      Then I assume what you're describing is purely a result of altitude, no?

      I should think anywhere which is equatorial and at sea level is going to be hella hot year round ... then again, I've never been south of about 23 degrees North, so I have no idea.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    29. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by magic+maverick+ · · Score: 1

      Where I live we have four seasons. The long dry, the long wet, the short dry, and the short wet.

      And as stated by others, the weather is really nice. Actually, at the moment it's a bit cool, sometimes it goes as low as 21 degrees! It does get a little hot sometimes (up to 35 degrees), but just don't go outside.

      And, we use an aircon at most one month a year when it does get really hot. Where I lived previously it used to get into the 40s for two or three months a year. And then bloody cold in the winter. Who could love that?

      --
      HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
    30. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by co1d+fjord · · Score: 0

      You're probably not a NSA plant. But you certainly seem to be a conservative or reactionary nut-job. Just by remembering some of what you've posted before.

      --
      Password: WDZHcjcV You can have this account for free trolling scum fucks.
    31. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      That depends... if your house has a furnace and an air conditioning unit, your main concerns are having a well insulated house, and having some means of reducing the impact of solar heat load (the sun generally hurts more in the summer that it helps in the winter). If you have heating and no air conditioning, you'll have a warm house in the winter, but your house might not cool down very well in the evenings during the summer.

    32. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by bobvious · · Score: 1

      Buy a small window unit for the bedroom. The most important thing is to sleep cool. I can endure the day's heat as long as I can do that. Also, keeping the bedroom cool during the day gives you an oasis from the heat from time to time. For a couple hundred bucks, it's worth it, even if it's not used very often.

    33. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by vandamme · · Score: 1

      I was just in Uganda, and it was chilly up in the mountains. Had to go to Belgium to warm up.

    34. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      Then I assume what you're describing is purely a result of altitude, no?

      I should think anywhere which is equatorial and at sea level is going to be hella hot year round ... then again, I've never been south of about 23 degrees North, so I have no idea.

      Yes, very likely. I lived in Ecuador for about a year, at 3800m altitude, where the temperature averaged something like 10C all year. A 45 minute (very entertaining) ride by motorcycle, however, took you down to about 1800m and ~28C. Another hour and you were at the coast, which was hellish at 35-40C.

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    35. Re:I am glad I don't have to do this... by GodGell · · Score: 1

      The crushing heat can reach thirty celcius. In somewhere like the southern US they'd laugh at that

      30C (86F) is stifling heat? We laugh at that in the Northern US. True, it would be a little uncomfortable indoors without A/C or at least good ventilation, but you would have to start talking at least 35C or maybe 40C before making US southerners uncomfortable outside.

      That's quite "moderate" by mainland European standards, too: I'm sitting in 34C indoors at the moment (Central Europe), and it's almost 40 outside (93F/104F). I've had hotter summers, too, but only in the last couple of years; I don't know what it's like elsewhere, but I distinctly remember the weather being completely different (more predictable, less extreme) as I was growing up...

      PS. Kudos for being the first American I've seen on Slashdot who recognizes noone else uses F. :-)
      As an aside - seeing as this article is already a few days old and people are not discussing anymore - have you, over there in the US, experienced the same kind of perceptible change in weather patterns in the last 10-15 years? It might just be faster here because my country is in a rather peculiar spot geographically.

      --
      [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
  3. So this is like.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The exact opposite or Mr. Burns?

    1. Re:So this is like.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellant observation Smithers

    2. Re:So this is like.. by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Shall I release the hounds sir?

    3. Re:So this is like.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you gonna release the hounds, or the bees, or the hounds with bees in their mouths so everytime they bark at you they shoot bees at you? Go ahead, do your worst.

  4. Metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What makes a circle of a diameter of about 15.5 meters.

    1. Re:Metric by Inda · · Score: 1

      I don't know AC, what makes a circle of a diameter of about 15.5 meters?

      They're retangular, by the way.

      538 square feet = 50 square metres

      2150 square feet = 199.7 square metres (lets call it 200)

      Metric bitch.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    2. Re:Metric by Inda · · Score: 1

      Oh, I a letter.

      rect-an-gular

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    3. Re:Metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From the article: "the light will create a 2,000-square-foot circle on the town square which is usually in shadow".

      A 2,000-square-foot circle == a circle of a diameter of about 15.5 meters.

      You try to correct a poster which is correct, and then add computations which he/she had likely already done.

    4. Re:Metric by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Since this is Norway we can likely assume it is/was 200 and 50 m^2.

      But since people in the US THINK DIFFERENT! (That one got to hurt!)

    5. Re:Metric by geirlk · · Score: 1

      Never mind that, he was right about the most essential detail:

      Metric, bitches!

    6. Re:Metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sister?

  5. Sam Kinison said it kinda first; but here's mine by ciderbrew · · Score: 0

    "It occurred to me that you wouldn't live near perpetual darkness, if you people would MOVE WHERE THE SUN SHINE IS!!!"

  6. Metric please ! by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... a 2000 square foot circle of the town square ... ... about 538 square feet ... up over 2150 square fee

    This is slashdot science ?

    Besides, the slashdot summary is ambigous : it mentions a population of 3,386, but in which unit ? Number of legs ?

    1. Re:Metric please ! by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Number of legs?

      No, number of feet, of course.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:Metric please ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... a 2000 square foot circle of the town square ... ... about 538 square feet ... up over 2150 square fee

      This is slashdot science ?

      Obviously Norwegians don't use metric units.

    3. Re:Metric please ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously Norwegians don't use metric units.

      We do, in fact. Must be a USian article.

    4. Re:Metric please ! by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Funny

      Imperial feet or metric feet?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:Metric please ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which means the submitter has made the effort to convert to IU's, yet couldn't simply copy MU's.

      Please could Slashdot have a rule to always use MU's (even if they're in brackets)? Can we do that? IU's don't mean much to many of us who are used to the global standard.

    6. Re:Metric please ! by Kidbro · · Score: 1

      While I agree that it's a stupid unit, ft2 to m2 conversion is really easy. Divide by ten, and you have a good approximate. Lean towards rounding down, if unsure.
      1 square meter is 10.7639 square feet.

    7. Re:Metric please ! by PPalmgren · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A scientist or engineer that can't handle common unit conversions is an unemployed scientist or engineer.

      The article is from a US website intended for a US audience, and uses US measurements. I don't expect a news aggregator to do extra work because you're lazy.

    8. Re:Metric please ! by h3st · · Score: 1

      at first I thought IU meant "International Units", like SI units (International System units) and MU meant Medieval Units ... I'm not sure your abbreviations are very good.

      --
      hei katter
    9. Re:Metric please ! by logyro · · Score: 1

      so a population of 3386 feet...that's 0.6412878788 miles?

    10. Re:Metric please ! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Probably neither. Norway hasn't been an empire for quite a while, and when you look at pictures from Norway, how many eople with meter-long shoes do you see?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    11. Re:Metric please ! by kwbauer · · Score: 2

      Typical lazy-ass European complaining about Americans not doing the work for them.

      Why is it that not many Americans on here complain about articles that use metric units? Probably because we are actually nerds that can do math instead of lazy-ass wannabees.

    12. Re:Metric please ! by kermidge · · Score: 1

      What's tough about it? Far as I can tell, the submitter was going with what info was presented in the article. Perhaps due diligence would have required him to call the town mayor and ask for precise numbers?

      One sentence says it lights up a circle of about 2000 sq. ft.
      In another sentence, the mirrors total 538 sq. ft.
      Onward, a more precise figure is given for the area of the circle, 2150 sq. ft. (From the middle slide, it's more like an ellipse, but that's kinda irrelevant; what matters, I think, is that there will be a place in the town square where folks can stand in a pool of reflected sunlight. Not enough to tan, but enough maybe to feel good on the face in the middle of winter. If you've ever lived with real winter then you know how good that can feel.)

    13. Re:Metric please ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Norwegian foot is 31.370 cm as defined when Norway started using the SI system in 1875.

      Swedish feet are by comparison only 29.64 cm. And you know what you can tell from the size of a mans feet.

      Now of course we all have the same SI inch (and by extension foot) so we all have the same size penises.

    14. Re:Metric please ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up please (I've commented), that made me cringe - knowing they actually put the effort in and went out of their way to convert a standard, globally recognized unit to something only used by a tiny handful of countries...

  7. Why not a balloon by art6217 · · Score: 1

    Why not a ballon, of the size of a giant hat, make of a tinfoil? If would need to be tilted somewhat, and turn itself towards the sun -- easy in the case of a ballon. Would not it be much cheaper? Of course, tinfoil does not have the directionality of a glass mirror, but make the hat big enough and it would not be a problem, and even be a feature -- the more ambient light would not decrease the iris size so much, and thus a human would perceive the lighted area as even more bright.

    1. Re:Why not a balloon by Sique · · Score: 2

      Because a balloon would not direct much of the light into the town, but basicly everywhere. Sun light is (nearly) parallel, and to reflect it into a town, you need a plane reflector. Only a small part of the balloon's surface would reflect the light into the desired direction.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:Why not a balloon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is not "a shape of a hat" suggesting a flat bottom?

    3. Re:Why not a balloon by Sique · · Score: 1

      I wonder how a) to stabilize such a design in the air and b) what happens if the wind goes.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    4. Re:Why not a balloon by art6217 · · Score: 1

      a) to stabilize such a design in the air and

      I guess that simply moving around/rotating around the vertical axis might be quite enough.

      b) what happens if the wind goes

      Fun! It would be mostly for fun anyway.

    5. Re:Why not a balloon by art6217 · · Score: 1

      moving around

      e.g. with a special, light harness, tied to three distant points on the surface.

    6. Re:Why not a balloon by art6217 · · Score: 1

      It had to be "the shape of a hat" -- i. e. with a flat mirroring surface on the bottom side, and with a gas container on the top side.

    7. Re:Why not a balloon by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      No. It is suggesting a convex surface on the outside of a concave surface. Why the hell would I want to wear a hat if I had to constantly balance it on my head?

  8. Look on bright side Norwayians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u got the long cold summers . but at least you can build house out of ice .

    1. Re:Look on bright side Norwayians by Tore+S+B · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't say that - we love the Norwegian summer. I think most people feel it's the best day of the whole dang year!

      (for those who might not have picked up on it: this is largely a joke.)

      --
      toresbe
    2. Re:Look on bright side Norwayians by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Don't say that - we love the Norwegian summer. I think most people feel it's the best day of the whole dang year!

      (for those who might not have picked up on it: this is largely a joke.)

      What about Norwegian Wood?

      --
      Be seeing you...
  9. Re:Sam Kinison said it kinda first; but here's min by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    "It occurred to me that you wouldn't live near perpetual darkness, if you people would MOVE WHERE THE SUN SHINE IS!!!"

    But its nice to go out in the daylight at 11:00 pm in summer.

  10. Re:Sam Kinison said it kinda first; but here's min by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It occurred to me that you wouldn't live near perpetual darkness, if you people would MOVE WHERE THE SUN SHINE IS!!!"

    But its nice to go out in the daylight at 11:00 pm in summer.

    ...and besides, perpetual /darkness/ is a bit inaccurate. You do get daylight in Rjukan even in winter, but the town itself is too far down the valley to catch any direct sunlight. All-winter shade would be more accurate.

  11. Couldn't the same setup be used by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Couldn't the same setup be used to make steam that could make electric? I think i seen an article of something simuler. Cant remember where/when. Couldn't magnifying glasses do the same also focus light to create steam?

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
    1. Re:Couldn't the same setup be used by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      It's not a village living in the stone age, they just lack natural sunlight.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    2. Re:Couldn't the same setup be used by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      sorry thats not what i asked

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    3. Re:Couldn't the same setup be used by zennyboy · · Score: 2
    4. Re:Couldn't the same setup be used by geirlk · · Score: 1

      Probably they could, yes, but would provide low return on investment. And since Rjukan was more or less built to size to man the hydro electric dam that feeds the entire area and earlier also powered Vemork factory, that would seem a bit superfluous. Besides you'd need a lot more mirrors than that.

    5. Re:Couldn't the same setup be used by geirlk · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0059263/
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vemork

      Some trivia:

      The Vemork factory was placed exactly there because of the optimal conditions for producing hydroelectric power.

      It started out fixing nitrogen for fertilizer, but later on was converted to produce heavy water. This is what Hitler needed for the production of a nazi A-bomb.

      Both nitrogen fixing and production of heavy water is extremely power consuming.

      The factory (and Rjukan city itself) lies so deep within the valley, the Allies considered it near impossible to bomb. They tried, once. The production was considered so important the Allies tried 4 sabotage operations against it.The most famous one, Operation Gunnerside, was made as a film, starring Kirk Douglas: The Heroes of Telemark.

      PS: Sorry about the links on top, using a shitty mobile browser.

  12. Re:Sam Kinison said it kinda first; but here's min by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some people might think it a curse. To them it is home.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  13. all that to light a 40x50 space? by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    They make electric 'day' lights you know. Ever been to a sports arena? If they can light an entire football pitch, why not just do this the old fashioned, non-expensive, non-boondogle way? Buy some floodlights and be done with it.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:all that to light a 40x50 space? by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      Tourism's an important part of the local economy, so this could end up a decent gimmick from that perspective. Giant sun-tracking mirrors sounds like a more interesting tourist attraction than stadium-style floodlights.

    2. Re:all that to light a 40x50 space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's Norway. 98% of their power is hydroelectric so they don't really need to reduce energy consumption for economic/environmental reasons. They are also in the top 5 of highest oil production per capita so they pretty much have more money than they know what to do with.
      Without energy and economy being limiting factors it just becomes a matter of life quality.

      They don't care about the light, they want some fancy natural sunlight and this option was easier than removing the mountain.

    3. Re:all that to light a 40x50 space? by necro81 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      why not just do this the old fashioned, non-expensive, non-boondogle way

      The article states that the project cost is only about $850k, mostly provided by private donations. The tracking motors will be solar-powered. So, for a modest outlay of capital today, they get ample, high-quality, non-polluting light for next to nothing for the life of the system. Any idea what a stadium lighting system costs? How about the cost of electricity and replacement bulbs to keep it operating for 8-16 hours a day, five months out of the year, for decades? Mirrors on a heliostat is not a boondogle, it's proven technology. And, in this case, probably cheaper than the alternative.

    4. Re:all that to light a 40x50 space? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I never really understood why small towns did this stuff in the name of "tourism". Yeah, nobody wanted to visit your town before, but you built a big sun reflector, or a statue of some famous dude, and now you think it's a tourist destination. You know what kinds of things are actually tourist attractions? Disney world, The Grand Canyon, The CN Tower, and other stuff like that. Why would you go to some valley town where they have to reflect the sun so you can get sunlight when you can travel an equal distance and go to the seaside where you don't have to worry about reflecting the sunlight.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:all that to light a 40x50 space? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2

      What part of "Tourism's an important part of the local economy" was so difficult to understand?

      That being the case, people are already visiting the town. In fact, if you could have been bothered to just search some info about this particular town, you'd know that the tourists visited that area for a few centuries, actually before the town even existed, because of the beautiful nature. Besides, the town belongs to the Telemark community, and Telemark basically stands for winter sports.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    6. Re:all that to light a 40x50 space? by geirlk · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vemork

      That could be one reason.

  14. Fun facts about Rjukan... by Tore+S+B · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Rjukan is also the site of the museum of industrial labour, which is located in Vemork. In addition to being a very early heavy water plant which was sabotaged by the Resistance during the second world war to hinder the Nazi nuclear bomb project, it also currently hosts an exhibit of what is probably the world's only remaining Univac 1108 mainframe.

    --
    toresbe
  15. Ants! by pokeparadox · · Score: 1

    Ok so who's going to be the person to set up giant magnifying classes in front of the mirrors?

  16. Re:Sam Kinison said it kinda first; but here's min by Tore+S+B · · Score: 1

    Because when the town was originally built, the topography was ideal for hydroelectric power generation.

    Since this was a good while before the social democrats and organized labour gained any real power, keeping the workers in literal (and not just figurative) darkness was not considered an issue.

    (The higher classes were literally so, and did not live in the shade.)

    --
    toresbe
  17. better and cheaper solution by Max_W · · Score: 1

    Several stationary mirrors-walls with different angles, using pieces of broken mirrors placed into the cement. Sort of mirror mosaic.

    Could be built by inhabitants themselves. No need for a million dollars or electricity.

    1. Re:better and cheaper solution by Max_W · · Score: 1

      Or a very large discotheque mirror ball on the mountain.

    2. Re:better and cheaper solution by jittles · · Score: 1

      Several stationary mirrors-walls with different angles, using pieces of broken mirrors placed into the cement. Sort of mirror mosaic.

      This may not work though, depending on how much snowfall they get. Mirrors that track the sun could be designed to dump snow, and since they track the sun are more likely to have any snow covering the mirrors melt. I haven't looked at the weather specifics of this town, but there are advantages to moving mirrors. Now if snow were to build up under the mirrors, they would not be able to move anyway, so there are plenty of issues to worry about.

  18. Rattenberg by methano · · Score: 2

    They did this same kind of mirror thing in Rattenberg, Austria a few years back.

  19. Mountains are the problem *and* the solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here's the location on google map : https://maps.google.com/maps?q=59.878637,+8.594049&hl=en&ll=59.878795,8.594055&spn=0.009131,0.02959&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=60.116586,121.201172&t=h&z=16

    Look at the mountains on both side of the main street with street view, one is blocking the sun in winter and the other is certainly where the mirrors will be.

  20. Seen this happen before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was some small town in the mountains that basically got no direct sunlight for such a long period of time.
    So they got together and placed some mirrors on the mountain nearby and suddenly the sun existed for many.

    I still wonder if it wouldn't be better to do this plus a huge bal above the village specifically created to turn in to a huge artificial sun.
    Combined with some pipes, it could also be used for solar power or heating from some of the excess light and the general heating caused by the imperfect reflective material.
    And then over time, you could add another mirror, and another, until the mountainside had a bunch of mirrors reflecting light in to this big ball in the sky.
    And with a big enough village, you could likely erect many light towers. Overall it would be more ideal than just directly reflecting it over a large area, more so if you do use the power generated for lighting too.

  21. Awesome. by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2

    Now we could hack into the controller and reprogram it to direct the sun to a single point and voila! Instant death ray. Might help with the tourist problem.

    1. Re:Awesome. by bgarcia · · Score: 1

      Now we could hack into the controller and reprogram it to direct the sun to a single point and voila! Instant death ray. Might help with the tourist problem.

      How would that help attract more touri...

      Ooooooooh.

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  22. What's the equivalent in watts? by hawguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How does this mirror compare to installing full spectrum lamps to light up the same 2000 sq ft area? Lights could provide extended "days" during the winter months, and could be solar powered from the same mountaintop that houses the mirrors when the sun is out.

    1. Re:What's the equivalent in watts? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Really? A "troll" moderation? What did I say that amounts to trolling?

    2. Re:What's the equivalent in watts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that the PV panels are only ~14% efficient (at best)... if the mirror surface is 84% reflective, that's still 6x better than the PV.
      Further, the sun only shines for ~5hrs on a good day in the winter months so you'd need a substantially larger array of panels to drive the lamps and additional battery storage to offer extended lighting... I suspect that the PV option, while on the surface attractive, would be much more expensive when you factored in the panels, inverters, wiring, batteries and lamps

      BTW - no idea why you got the troll mod

      Al

    3. Re:What's the equivalent in watts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sun is way too weak during the winter here. It never comes more than a few degrees above horizon, which means that most energy will be scattered by the atmosphere.
      Here in middle of Norway it only gets about 2-3 degrees above horizon in december before it starts setting again..

  23. Re:Sam Kinison said it kinda first; but here's min by laejoh · · Score: 0

    You're from Yorkshire?

  24. Re:Sam Kinison said it kinda first; but here's min by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    Funny you should ask. ..... Oh!

    Of course in the eyes of some, this should precede watching the second link.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  25. Viganella??? by asylumx · · Score: 1

    Really, a town named Viganella with mirrors all over the place? These jokes write themselves!

  26. Table this discussion by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

    until Climate Change is finished. Then we can talk about where is a nice place to live or not. My area promises to be much nicer in the future with less seasonal change than now. I'm looking forward to change.

    --
    jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
  27. Not the first by kimvette · · Score: 0
    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Not the first by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Oh wait nevermind they blocked the sun. It's been a while. :-(

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  28. horrible waste of money by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    that money could have bought dozens of street lamps and paid the electric bill for years

    1. Re:horrible waste of money by rasmusbr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the cost of the electricity would have been an order of magnitude lower than the cost of the mirror system if we assume that it consumes 10 kW and runs for 10 hours a day 200 days a year. It would also probably have been more reliable and easier to service...

      But on the other hand, would the electric light be able to simulate the spectrum of natural light the way that natural light changes during the day? Would the electric light double as a minor tourist attraction the way that the mirror probably will?

      We're already draping our cities in ever larger quantities of LED:s during the winter half of the year up in the north, so it's not like it's a question of either-or. I just hope they're able to get the servos to run reliably and without too much maintenance.

  29. Oh, the math, um, er, um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's try doing the math.

    If they aim those ~500 at a 2000 square foot area, assuming 80% efficiency, the light level will be 1/5 that of full daylight. Over an area about 45 by 45 feet.

    Now just the light from the blue sky is about 1/5 of full sunlight, so they're basically doubling the light in one small area.

    Somehow that does not impress me, with it's intensity nor its size.

  30. Not going to look anything like the simulation... by Thagg · · Score: 2

    If the mountain is a 2km away the reflection from the mirror is going to be very broad indeed. The sun is a half-degree across, and half-degree times 2km means that the edges of the mirror beam will be about 20 meters wide, nice soft edges and not the harsh ellipse shown. The ends of the ellipse will have edges more like 100 meters wide.

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
  31. What could possibly go wrong? by tmarzolf · · Score: 1

    Was this plan conceived by an eight year old boy?

    There are millions of ants screaming "Never Again!"

    --

    This Sig has been depreciated.

  32. Was I the only one ... by RaccoonBandit · · Score: 2

    ... who thought, after reading the title, that they were going to put mirrors into space? Giant mirrors in geostationary orbit focussing the light onto a small Norwegian town? Now that would be a tourist attraction.

  33. We have AC down here. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    True, it would be a little uncomfortable indoors without A/C or at least good ventilation, but you would have to start talking at least 35C or maybe 40C before making US southerners uncomfortable outside.

    That's not necessarily true. Almost all homes and apartments in the South are air conditioned unless you're very poor. That kind of spoils us when it comes to high heat, as I learned when I moved for a few years out to the Pacific Northwest where they don't bother with A/C because it's only really needed in August.

    Maybe it's different if you're an outdoors type, but for most of us 40 C is "stay the f--- indoors" weather, especially when humidity is as high as it is in most of the South.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  34. Read that wrong. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Well Ireland did have a summer for once this year although it's pissing it down at this moment.

    At first, I though you wrote "although they're p---ing it down," and I thought, "Man I heard it was a hard drinking culture, but damn..."

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  35. Re:Sam Kinison said it kinda first; but here's min by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

    "near perpetual darkness" taken from TFA. Their words not mine.