Slashdot Mirror
Famed ATM Hacker Barnaby Jack Dies Days Before Black Hat Conference
wiredmikey writes "A shocking and sad day today in the security industry. Well known hacker Barnaby Jack has passed away, sending a shock through the security community. Jack, a famed white hat hacker, was scheduled to present at the Black Hat conference on Tuesday, and present research on vulnerabilities in implantable medical devices. Shocked reactions hit the Twittersphere on Friday, as many in the industry conveyed their condolences, shock, and even disbelief, hoping new of the death was some sort of hoax. 'I just wake up and heard this, really sad, I can't believe this, no words,' Cesar Cerrudo, CTO, IOActive Labs, said in an email to SecurityWeek. Barnaby Jack is probably best known for his ATM hacking demonstrations, which he liked to refer as 'Jackpotting,' and performed at a few conferences, including a demonstration at Black Hat 2010 that got media attention around the world. The San Francisco Medical Examiner's office told Reuters that Jack had died in San Francisco on Thursday, but did not provide additional details."
. The San Francisco Medical Examiner's office told to Reuters that Jack had died in San Francisco on Thursday, but did not provide additional details."
Well, that is the official version of events, yes. -- NSA
#fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
Sometimes people just die.
Sometimes people get killed.
Sometimes people get killed by agencies funded by (yet unaccountable to) the United States Federal Government.
Not saying that's what happened. Just saying...
A 50% chance of passing away prior to the start of the gathering and a 50% chance of passing away after the start of the gathering.
We are all honey pots for entropy
That sucks.
He was an interesting character. He helped me sneak a girl into a hacker party at the Peppermill one year during Defcon. No one that drank with him, even once, will ever forget him.
God had better keep an eye on him. If the pearly gates have any exploits, he'll find them.
See that "Preview" button?
You know, I can't say I'm a big fan of the President but that drivel you spout is ridiculous in the extreme. The fantasy world you live in makes Hollywood movies seem realistic. I'd be willing to bet my life that President Obama never ordered anyone to cluster bomb a village filled with women and children. It is possible that the military targeted a site thought to be a terrorist camp and it was filled with women and children. Maybe, but I doubt even that happened. You see, women and children are targets for the terrorists that think making war on women and children is the way to go since they know they stand zero chance in a stand up fight with US Marines. They like to put up anti-aircraft batteries in school yards filled with children so that either no one will attack them to prevent killing the children or if someone does attack them fools like you will say that they targeted the children and school and forget to mention a couple of hundred terrorists and weaponry. I dislike almost everything the President does but he's the elected President of my Nation and I resent this bullshit slander by a lying idiot like you.
A month ago the idea that the US government was monitoring the entire internet, had access to every major ISPs records and could listen to anyone's phone calls at any time was a joke. Now look where we're at. I'm not saying we have to believe the wildest of conspiracy theories but at this point we have no baseline from which to compare. What the NSA is doing with their spying is so outrageous that I can no longer use common sense to judge if a conspiracy theory about their actions is more or less likely. Just because it defies common sense, just because it would cost billions, just because it would be technically infeasible, immoral, unconstitutional and would result it little or no benefit to the NSA, government or American people, no longer means they wont do it. If you would have asked me a month ago what was more likely, that the Government was doing what we now know the NSA is doing, or if the Government was executing reporters and security researchers it thought were a threat to national security, I'd have quickly said the latter.
Like I said, maybe. Collateral damage is not targeting someone. Collateral damage is what happens when a rocket launcher is shooting at you and you shoot back blowing up the launcher and, unfortunately, the people in the neighborhood where the launcher is located. For this reason people usually flee war zones but many times terrorists actually block people from leaving so they can up the likelihood of collateral damage.
I wonder how much his research would have cost device makers monetarily... Does anyone know if the research he was going to present is or will still be made publicly available?
Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once
Anybody knows what Jack died from?
Well, SOMEbody does. But they're not telling.
There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
I'd be willing to bet my life that President Obama never ordered anyone to cluster bomb a village filled with women and children. It is possible that the military targeted a site thought to be a terrorist camp and it was filled with women and children.
Yeah, if your second sentence is true, then your first sentence is false.
There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
It's not "hacking" when the government just uses the access codes to your pacemaker that the manufacturer so thoughtfully gave to them.
Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading
That's a really self-serving definition of "collateral damage". You're a tool.
To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
Based on misreported deaths -- e.g., John Denver's death by aircraft misreported a week before the actual event -- there is a small (let's be generous, call it 0.1% ) chance that he did not die as of the time of publication by Reuters.
Because of that, his chance of dying after the Black Hat conference is nowhere close to 50%. His chance of dying before the event was less than, but approaches, 100%.
We adjust statistics to reflect known facts and known probabilities. The reports of his death are a known fact. Whether he in fact died is not a known fact.
[For you researchers out there: this is just like the rules for combining data sets: if the number of data points in each set is not known, you use one set of rules. If the number of points is known, you use a set of rules similar to combination of areas and moments of inertia with the Parallel Axis theorem. Use the correct combination equations for the situation, please]
Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
Try this instead: http://www.reuters.com/search?blob=barnaby+jack
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
Actually, the joke was more like an ad on a college bulletin board:
"Did you know that the NSA is not only interested in spying, but also funds research in almost every field of university study? ... if you would like an application form for an NSA grant, call your mother and ask for one...."
Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
But when I hear a man over 40 die suddenly its usually a heart attack, accident or suicide.
A month ago the idea that the US government was monitoring the entire internet, had access to every major ISPs records and could listen to anyone's phone calls at any time was a joke.
Was it? It seemed totally plausible to me.
All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
That's just the thing here. Banking controls the world right now. We think it is government, but it's pretty much banking and money. As the global financial crisis comes closer to "the end of things" it's getting more and more serious. Now that the people hacking, cracking and exploiting vulnerabilities in money systems and services are becoming heroes to the people, the government can no longer be trusted to handle these people through official means.
We're going to see a lot more assassinations and mysterious deaths than we have been seeing lately.
A better definition of collateral damage (that matches what the U.S. military and three letter agencies are actually doing) would be something like, "You're sitting in a trailer in Texas, watching a live feed from the UAV you're piloting over Pakistan, when you see a group of young men. Your supervisor tells you they're insurgents and you should kill them. You fire a missile at the group, entirely dismembering every one of them. They were standing next to a woman holding a baby who was walking by. She and the baby are splattered all over the ground." THAT'S collateral damage. Not just the woman in the baby, but between 0 and ALL of the group of young men identified as insurgents.
Not so. An order by the military is not an order from Obama. This may come as a shock, but the the military occasionally acts without Obama's direct knowledge. If the first sentence is true, then Obama said "Bomb this place." The second sentence can happen entirely without that scenario.
I think the point he is trying to make is that there was never an order to bomb a village when it was known that it was filled with women and children, or that the point of the bombing was to kill said women and children.
Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
Your definition is also correct. There is no way to fight a war in an occupied city without killing civilians. In the parent's post however he made it sound as if those guys in that trailer were actually targeting the woman with the baby which is stupid. Even absent the wrongness of that it makes no sense even from a practical standpoint because it's a waste of resources to kill those that can't conceivably be a threat. The only way to avoid civilian deaths is to give up and leave. I can say that I think that may be a good idea but then eventually the area becomes a general threat again. Sometimes there is no good solution.
Ah! Someone who can read and comprehend. I actually think most deliberately misunderstand out of spite.
Does anyone know if (by any chance) he had a pacemaker?
Not arguing here (we're all friends here), but look into some of the stories of the remote operators. One told about being ordered to target a dwelling, out of which ran what looked like a "very short person", just before the missile hit. That figure was completely obliterated. The operator asked his spotter for more information about it, and was told, "it was just a dog". It seems as though there's a callous disregard for innocents in these operations, even after you discount the helicopter pilots who joked about the insurgents they tore to shreds with the cannon (who turned out to be journalists).
There's more than a little wrong here.