Slashdot Mirror


Training Materials for NSA Spying Tool "XKeyScore" Revealed

dryriver writes with news of the latest document release on NSA spying programs. Quoting The Guardian: "A top secret National Security Agency program allows analysts to search with no prior authorization through vast databases containing emails, online chats, social media activities and the internet browsing histories of millions of individuals, according to documents provided by whistleblower Edward Snowden. The NSA boasts in training materials that the program, called XKeyscore, is its 'widest-reaching' system for developing intelligence from the Internet. The latest revelations will add to the intense public and congressional debate around the extent of NSA surveillance programs. They come as senior intelligence officials testify to the Senate judiciary committee on Wednesday, releasing classified documents in response to the Guardian's earlier stories on bulk collection of phone records and Fisa surveillance court oversight. The files shed light on one of Snowden's most controversial statements, made in his first video interview published by the Guardian on June 10. 'I, sitting at my desk,' said Snowden, could 'wiretap anyone, from you or your accountant, to a federal judge or even the president, if I had a personal email.' U.S. officials vehemently denied this specific claim. Mike Rogers, the Republican chairman of the House intelligence committee, said of Snowden's assertion: 'He's lying. It's impossible for him to do what he was saying he could do.'" The slides in question. Looks like it was Mike Rogers that was lying and not Snowden. So much for the NSA's attempt at quieting public fear by releasing information on the Verizon phone data collection program before Congressional hearings today.

35 of 347 comments (clear)

  1. Quote from another dead hero by bonch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "They don't want the voice of reason spoken, folks, 'cause otherwise we'd be free. Otherwise we wouldn't believe their fucking horseshit lies, nor the fucking propaganda machine, the mainstream media, and buy their horseshit products that we don't fucking need, and become a third world consumer fucking plantation, which is what we're becoming. Fuck them! They're liars and murders. All governments are liars and murderers, and I am now Jesus. Now. And this is my compound."

    - Bill Hicks, Live at Laff Stop in Austin

    1. Re:Quote from another dead hero by AuMatar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just fine. Its so much easier to do their own snooping when they just have to tap the lines going into one location. Not to mention they can seize the servers at will.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:Quote from another dead hero by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sarcasm doesn't do well with the wall-of-text format. There's only so many words you can read in your mind's inner "sarcastic tone" before it just feels screechy.

    3. Re:Quote from another dead hero by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I wonder if the people of the US are ever going to rise up, or if it just gets much worse before it gets better.

    4. Re:Quote from another dead hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know? That's America's problem. Heroes. You've gotten so used to having heroes do this, do that, that when something bad happens, you stick your head in the sand and wait for a "hero" to take care of it.

      Solve your own damned problems instead of blaming others and just watching from the sidelines. It's your country, nobody elses, and unless you don't want that to change, you better act fast.

    5. Re:Quote from another dead hero by wmac1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      They will rise up to vote for American idol. Just wait and see.

    6. Re:Quote from another dead hero by NatasRevol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That would probably be better than what's in Congress right now.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    7. Re:Quote from another dead hero by wmac1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let me predict what will be revealed after this.

      NSA and CIA have been working on a "behavior modeling and prediction" software for almost 20 years with huge research budgets. Very famous scientists (some of the top researchers in MIT and other institutes) have worked on the system.

      Give the data to the software and it will reveal/predict things that you yourself could not remember/know.

      This is a scary situation. It is really messy.

    8. Re:Quote from another dead hero by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wonder how many "hacking attempts from China" are actually from NSA...

    9. Re:Quote from another dead hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have an SSH monitor script that emails me every morning with a list of unauthorized login attempts. These attempts have completely stopped, right about the time Snowden came out in the news. Weird.

  2. Before anybody asks... by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...yes. It runs Linux.

    b&

    --
    All but God can prove this sentence true.
  3. Is anyone really surprised? by intermodal · · Score: 4, Informative

    First off, almost anything "publicly" done on the Internet or through a third party server is suspect. Second, the idea that the NSA isn't doing this is patently absurd. Third, if you believe the NSA when they deny doing things like this, you are an idiot. Espionage agencies are basically required to lie. It's in their job description. Quite literally, their job is to deceive people.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:Is anyone really surprised? by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First off, almost anything "publicly" done on the Internet or through a third party server is suspect. Second, the idea that the NSA isn't doing this is patently absurd. Third, if you believe the NSA when they deny doing things like this, you are an idiot.

      The FBI has the capability to bust down my door at any time. Pretty much anybody with a boot can bust through my door. The capability isn't a problem. I'm comfortable with the capability existing, because I don't know where I can buy an unkickdownable door. That's why instead I have this piece of paper that says nobody can kick down my door without being a legitimate executive of a warrant signed by a judge who agreed there is probable cause I've violated a law passed by representatives I had a say in electing. The capability to kick down doors doesn't scare me. However, the kicking down of doors without following the rules on that piece of paper terrifies me.

      I've been on these internets for awhile now. BBSes long before that, playing Legend of the Red Dragon at 1200 baud on the Crunchy Booger. And there were plenty of jokes in IRC about there being No Such Agency that reads your e-mail. And I long suspected they had the capability to do these things. And after the room 641A disclosure, I knew they had the capability to do this.

      Hell, I demand they have the capability to do these things. After all, you can't execute a warrant to tap a phone without having the capability to tap a phone.

      But the idea that the NSA is sucking up and storing forever my emails, my phone records, my financial records, hell, the logs of every time and location my 13-year old niece has called for pizza...that is what was absurd. Completely, bonkers insane and absurd.

      And they're doing it. That's the craziest thing.

      You want to know what the banality of evil looks like? Not the kind of monstrous evil of murder or slavery or genocide. Just the simple, mechanical, banality of evil? That they're fucking doing it. To me, to you, to my wife, to my mom, to my sister, to my brother, to my nieces and nephews. My son's 10 months old, and as soon as he's old enough to have a thought in his head they'll start trying to pry it out.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    2. Re:Is anyone really surprised? by xevioso · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The real elephant in the room here is how this is really very dangerous for democracy.

      I have yet to hear any politician discuss the REAL threat here, in the long run...the threat to American Democracy itself.

      Imagine the following scenario: A guy like Snowden, hired by a Republican/Democratic senator, gets a job with Booz Allen, and proceeds to use these tools to spy on the political campaign of either their direct opponent in a campaign, or the opposing candidate in an election campaign. They are able to make up an excuse and take this information out, and pass it on to their candidate.

      And then one day this information gets out, that someone was spying, ala Nixon-style on everything the opponent was doing. If you think the sh** is hitting the fan now, just you wait until THAT happens. Hell hath no fury like a politician who has been spied upon.

    3. Re:Is anyone really surprised? by intermodal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even with what he did, he'd have got away with it today. What Nixon did is basically nothing at all compared to today's political espionage between our factions.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  4. The NSA is out of control. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They run themselves. They have a secret court where defendants are not allowed to attend, and are not even told they are on trial. They lie to congress. They lie to the president. They have an unlimited secret budget that nobody can check. They appear to be mostly controlled by the contractors and companies that sell them services. It's a giant graft. Private parties are helping themselves to public money, creating a surveillance state for unknown reasons under the guise fighting terrorism.

    This is going to end badly. People with money and lots of power don't give up their toys easily. Expect to see the following soon: Lots of assassinations, or the NSA being raided by another enforcement branch of govt. Or maybe both.

  5. VPNs not safe from the NSA by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lovely bullet point:

    * Show me all the VPN startups in country X, and give me the data so I can decrypt and discover the users.

    Translation: not only do you have no privacy, doing what you think will make you hidden will just shine a spotlight on yourself.

    b&

    --
    All but God can prove this sentence true.
    1. Re:VPNs not safe from the NSA by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Along the same lines, I've wondered exactly where the line is when "admitting" that you've committed a crime. Obviously I wouldn't suggest that people start talking like they're a terrorist, but is it against the law to "admit" to robbing a bank that hasn't been robbed? Is it against the law to talk in depth about an AK47 that I don't own (as though I do own it)? I would imagine with enough people pretending that they've committed crimes that their monitoring would become useless.

      Seriously, what are they going to do? Break into my house and grab me while I'm in the middle of typ

  6. Re:No, it still looks like Snowden was lying... by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would anyone assume the database includes only suspects that they're authorized to track? Given the track record of the NSA it is less likely that that is the case and it is more likely that they have anyone they want in it.

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  7. "Congressional hearings" by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bogus! It's a congressional coverup designed to rationalize all this bullshit, with people like Pelosi on her knees before the NSA. Of course what makes it worse is the idiot public who believes all this crap and reelects these bums. How do we stop them from voting away our rights?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:"Congressional hearings" by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When the story first broke, Obama, Boehner, Pelosi, Fienstein, McCain, all formed a wall around the Agency.

      "It's all legal! We've been briefed!"

      Which group looks like they have the power in that situation?

      If Obama said "Ice cream is tasty" Boehner would hold a press conference about how only secret muslim communists with plots to install sharia law like ice cream, and real, honest, hard-working middle-class Americans eat pie.

      But the one thing Obama, Boehner, Pelosi, Fienstein, McCain, and Dick fucking Cheney can all agree on is the legality, Constitutionality, appropriateness and necessity of collecting, analyzing and storing forever every phone call and email my 13-year old niece makes. For national security.

      (repeat of something I posted last month)

      Scarier part: why aren't they blaming each other for this "serious overreach?" That they will then investigate, have some hearings, and then go right back to biz as usual? That's all politicians do. Make vague, meaningless statements and take no responsibility, blame everyone else, then do nothing. Instead they're making firm, direct statements. "Legal!" "Constitutional!" "Full oversight!"

      Why are they so far off script? Here's how the script is supposed to go:

      Snowden: "They doin' teh snoops!"
      Democrats: "Bush started it!"
      Republicans: "Saint Bush never would have authorized this! This must be part of a secret communist Muslim plan to install sharia law!"
      Obama: "No, really it was just the Cincinnati branch of the NSA!"
      Senate committee: "Thank you for your service, Mr. Snowden for bringing this overreach to our attention. We've got top men working to correct it. Top. Men."
      Snowden: "No prob, I'll go rot in obscurity now."
      Clapper: "Ow. My wrist. From the slapping. Wheeeeeelp, back to the shadows for biz as usual."

      The mask isn't just slipping. It's on the floor. The man behind the curtain is doing a tap dance. Just what the fuck is going on?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  8. Re:No, it still looks like Snowden was lying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    What part of PRISM didn't you get? The part where they hoover up data on everyone without a warrant or the part where they don't have to justify it to anyone?

  9. More info by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wikipedia has an entry on it: X-Keyscore

    Good background story: Solving the mystery of PRISM

    Spiegel Online covered it: 'Key Partners': Secret Links Between Germany and the NSA

    Oddly enough it appears that news about intelligence programs used by America and its allies is reported in Persian. Go figure.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:More info by arf_barf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't know if I was the only one that picked it up, but the slides are for a version of software that was in use in 2008. Considering everything else, the capabilities now are more likely to be much more advanced.

  10. How did the government pull this off? by null+etc. · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's shocking to discover that the government can actually accomplish anything, as opposed to wasting $800 million in taxpayer money with nothing to show for it.

  11. Re:No, it still looks like Snowden was lying... by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They've already cop'd to mapping networks out to (n>2) degrees of contact. It's the "implicit authorization to track people networked to a suspect" that makes this all so dangerous.

    I'm not the first to refer to the lame "Kevin Bacon" jest.

  12. Re:The NSA is lying, ALWAYS by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Every public statement they make is a fucking lie. If they tell you it's sunny outside, you can bet that it's raining. They lie to Congress, they lie to the public, they lie to the President. When they go home at night, they lie to their wives and kids. They tell their dying grandmothers that they're fine and don't need chemo. They take down "Road Closed" signs and laugh when people wreck their cars as a result. They will climb a tree to lie when they could stand on the ground and tell the truth.

    They always lie. They always WILL lie.

    Not true. When you assume that they're always lying, they'll tell the truth, under the secure knowledge that you won't believe them.

    For them it's not about truth/falsehood, it's about manipulation of people to achieve the desired ends. People who always assume they lie are much easier to manipulate than those who continually think critically.

  13. Sounds Useful! by AdamStarks · · Score: 4, Funny

    I heard the NSA has had trouble complying with a recent FOIA request, something about not being able to read their own emails. Someone should tell them about this "XKeyScore" thingamajig!

  14. Re:No, it still looks like Snowden was lying... by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That the data is collected has already been established, by more than one whistleblower. That's old news.

    The new revelation here is that a relatively low-level guy could easily search through the database looking for everything they want. That lapse in security is actually surprising, even if you have a low opinion of the NSA.

    From a legal perspective, it seems they are allowed to collect the data, but they can only look at it if authorized (ie, crtain requirements are met). What Snowden is saying is that the authorization method wasn't very robust, which means that someone somewhere probably has actually abused this to check up on his girlfriend or something.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  15. Chrome Incognito by skaralic · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder how much of an accident it is that Chrome's Incognito mode tells you:

    Going incognito doesn't affect the behavior of other people, servers, or software. Be wary of:

    • Websites that collect or share information about you
    • Internet service providers or employers that track the pages you visit
    • Malicious software that tracks your keystrokes in exchange for free smileys
    • Surveillance by secret agents
    • People standing behind you
  16. Re:No, it still looks like Snowden was lying... by houghi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you tell a kid that it should not steal cookies and when it does you do nothing about it, it will assume that it is allowed to take the cookies. The longer you allow it, the harder it will be to enforce the rule.

    The defense of the parent could be anything from "Because I said so." to "My house, my rules."

    So who has told the NSA to stop it and what actions have been taken to punish them? If I were the NSA, I would assume that all I do is authorized, until somebody stops me.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  17. Re:No, it still looks like Snowden was lying... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A database containing only suspects they are authorized to track would be worthless to them in the context they're trying to sell it. Every argument they have made makes it clear that they see it as searching for a needle in the haystack, and all of us, all of us, are the hay.

    That is, until someone in some government somewhere decides you look more like a needle.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  18. We U.S. Citizens Are All Criminals! by Ultimate+Heretic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Found a little comment in the Austin,TX paper that is very appropriate to the NSA actions: "If we are to accept that the executive branch of the U.S. government is operating within the bounds of the Constitution in its implementation of the recently disclosed domestic spy program. i.e., having approval through the FISA court and tacit congressional consent, then per the 4th amendment, “no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,” the only valid probable cause to surveil the entire domestic population is to declare them likely criminals. The question to answer then becomes, what do the citizens of this land do when their government has wholesale declared them all criminals?" So I put it to you, what is the correct course of action when we citizens of these United States of America are now all criminals in the eyes of the government?

  19. Re:No, it still looks like Snowden was lying... by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    President Merkin Muffley: General Turgidson, I find this very difficult to understand. I was under the impression that I was the only one in authority to order the use of nuclear weapons.

    General "Buck" Turgidson: That's right, sir, you are the only person authorized to do so. And although I, uh, hate to judge before all the facts are in, it's beginning to look like, uh, General Ripper exceeded his authority.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  20. Re:No, it still looks like Snowden was lying... by jovius · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry to inform you but it says so in the very document:

    "Rolling Buffer" of ~3 days of ALL unfiltered data seen by XKEYSCORE:
    - stores full-take data at the collection site - indexed by meta-data
    - over 500 servers distributed around the world

    Later:

    - we can use this traffic to detect anomalies which can lead us to intelligence by itself
    - E-mail Addresses, Extracted Files, Full Log, HTTP Parser, Phone Number, User Activity

    It appears they take all data and then use that to detect anomalies. It includes data on everyone, and from all of the data they try to pinpoint targets.

    Look for anomalous events
    - Someone whose language is out of place for the region they are in
    - Someone who is using encryption
    - Someone searching the web for suspicious stuff

    They have example tasks listed such as:

    - Show me all the encrypted word documents from Iran
    - Show me all PGP usage in Iran
    - Swow me all the VPN startups in country X, and give me the data so I can decrypt and discover the users
    - Show me all the Microsoft Excel spreadsheets containing MAC addresses coming out of Iraq so I can perform network mapping
    - Show me all th exploitable machines in country X
    - Show me all the word documents with references to IAEO [International Atomic Energy Organization?]
    - Show me all documents that reference Osama Bin Laden