Slashdot Mirror


Is China Wiring Africa For Surveillance?

Daniel_Stuckey writes "Huawei has invested billions of dollars in Africa over the last two decades, providing affordable cell phones, internet access, and telecommunications networks to the continent. Over the last few months Huawei has closed major deals in Africa to get more areas on the grid. The company says it's bridging the digital divide, but others suspect it's wiring the continent for surveillance."

18 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by mveloso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nobody cares enough about Africa to listen in on them. The only thing Africa has is resources, and China already is buying them. Is the infrastructure subject to surveillance? Sure, but every infrastructure is, even heterogeneous ones like the US.

    1. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Resources need deals signed with local leaders. Smart local experts will chatter about the quality of the deal, some been more into nationalism and patriotism than any bribe can alter.
      They will do the math with the local press - the cost of a university, hospital, roads, new mines, power, rail vs the true long term total export value.
      Such experts and their press contacts need to be found and shown the error of their ways.
      Any African country doing huge deals with a France, UK, USA, Russia knows the part they have to play. Empty ships arrive, full ships depart, the local leadership is looked after and a few locals get jobs.
      You had South Africa, Cuba, East Germany all playing the aid/spy card too.
      Vietnam, China mostly went for long term farm aid and very long term friendship.
      The visions of Moscow, London and Washington have usually been the same, influence, shared mil bases, listening stations, blocking China/France/Japan.
      What can leaders in Africa do?
      Sell out to mines/oil backed by US banks and loans with a few nice people from MI6/CIA to ensure its stays good.
      Sell out to mines/oil backed by Russian loans with a few nice people from FSB/KGB to ensure its all good.
      Sell out to mines/oil backed by China with a lots of nice new experts, workers and useful infrastructure ensure its all good.
      Add in arms dealers, political and faith based groups who feel timber, oil, gems and strategic minerals are much better looked after in Paris, London, Washington.
      So you have a lot of groups who dont want the locals getting too vocal.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:But there's nothing to listen to in Africa by moronoxyd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Resources need deals signed with local leaders. Smart local experts will chatter about the quality of the deal, some been more into nationalism and patriotism than any bribe can alter.

      So why is nobody suspecting surveillance when a US or European company is building communication infrastructure somewhere?
      They have exactly the same interest in knowing about this chatter as China.

  2. it's about time by clovis · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's about time somebody started spying on Africa.
    Everytime they have a TV show about Africa, it's just a bunch of f**king lions and elephants. Where are all the people?
    What the heck's going on there? It's about time somebody found out.

  3. Different approaches to aid by stungod · · Score: 5, Interesting

    About 4 years ago, I took a trip to Ethiopia. One guy I talked to there was the head of an aid organization that helped build infrastructure in the more rural parts of the country. He explained to me that while the Western countries like the US, Germany, the UK, etc donated money to local organizations, the Chinese preferred to come in and do the job themselves. It saves on the corruption and waste, and they get to build a positive impression themselves. So you see lots of Chinese companies there building roads, burying cable, building farms/industry, etc.

    He told me they had the right idea. The Chinese are *investing* in Africa as opposed to donating to it. That's going to have a long-term impact on who has more influence in Africa. So yeah, they're going to build surveillance...they're building the infrastructure. If we wanted to stop them, we'd go start building too.

    1. Re:Different approaches to aid by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's Chinese colonialism. They are doing EXACTLY what the Europeans did. Just like the Europeans the Africans will be happy to allow them until they realize none of the jobs are going to them and that the infrastructure is simply to facilitate resource exploitation, just like the Europeans.

  4. It could be worse by obarthelemy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They could be propping up regimes that routinely use torture and abuse human rights, and randomly killing innocents with drones. But then there'd be nothing left for the US to do...

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  5. And again... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...China taking away jobs from the US.

    Dammit, spying on the world is OUR job! They took uuur juuuuubs!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think you just wanted an excuse to use the mostly unknown word "exfiltrate." Your post doesn't actually say anything at all.....

  7. Zero content article by jma05 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Exactly why do we discuss articles like this? There is zero evidence so far that China is doing mass surveillance outside of China.

    The articles acknowledges it, and asks questions that cannot be answered, while providing no new insights.

  8. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The NSA, facebook, and google seem to demonstrate that spying on everyone requires shockingly little investment and gets good returns even when you don't know exactly what you want to find in your spying.

    Plus, there seem to be a lot of stuff that is worth knowing. There's oil and other natural resources in Africa, right? Seems like intercepting geological reports within western companies, or whoever, about where the oil might be could be very advantageous to China.

  9. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess if it comes for free, that's one thing, but how much money do you think China wants to invest exfiltrating data from Africa as opposed to their first-world competitors?

    Right. Because first-world companies don't do any business in Africa.

    Alternatively, China is investing in Africa for the long haul, because China desperately wants access to Africa's vast natural resources. Many African Governments include infrastructure projects as a requirement for Chinese acquisitions or in trade deals with China.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  10. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As an Australian in the Oil&Gas (and previously the mining) industry, the main reason Australia's economy is so big right now is because it's more expensive and dangerous to rip the shit outta Africa and Brazil.

    Once China (the biggest importer of iron by a long way) nail that down, I'll need to expatriate or be out of a job. Providing digital-age tools and infrastructure to Africa is an incredibly smart move for China.

  11. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by icebike · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe Huawei is finding itself shut out of western markets for fear of backdoors and stolen code, that the best market they can find is selling to their own government's aid programs.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  12. Re:Exfiltrate Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Huawei employee here (non-chinese, btw).

    Huawei is not being shut out of "western" markets, with the exception of the US. Huawei has an extensive deployment of radio, wireless access, packet switching and core systems across Europe and Latinamerica. A good portion of what 3G and LTE networks in both sides of the Atlantic for any operator you care to mention is using Huawei sytems.

    I must recognise, though, that laws and regulations (both in telecom proper and labour areas) make it easier for Huawei in african countries than they do elsewhere.

    Huawei is *not* a multinational company with its headquarters in China, it is a Chinese company with offices all over the world. Big difference. All decision-making is either done from China or by chinese PHBs abroad; and many of them can't seem to get that they are not in China (when in Europe, for instance) and they want to do things in their own way, which is proving to be easier in (some) african countries.

    IMO, yes, Huawei is wiring Africa for its own purposes...and that may involve surveillance.

  13. Africa is natural resource rich, thats why by Camael · · Score: 4, Informative

    Natural resources is the name of the game. And its not just China eyeing the riches.

    One of the more geographically remote locations was Africa, where Japan and China, and to a growing extent South Korea and India, are in fierce competition to win contracts for energy and mineral rights on the continent.

    Africa’s allure is easy to understand. Libya ranks ninth in world oil reserves, Nigeria 10th and Angola 16th. For natural gas reserves, Nigeria ranks eighth, Algeria ninth and Egypt 15th.

    In addition, Africa holds 95.5 percent of the world’s platinum reserves, 58.3 percent of all diamonds, 49.2 percent of all cobalt, 45.8 percent of the chromium supply and 27.1 percent of the world’s manganese.

  14. From the evil overlord list by voss · · Score: 4, Funny

    100. Finally, to keep my subjects permanently locked in a mindless trance, I will provide each of them with free unlimited Internet access.

    Well played China...well played...

  15. Re: Exfiltrate Africa? by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's less money in Africa than elsewhere, but by the same token, there is less entrenched competition there as well.

    Who ever gets there firstest with the mostest has a great chance of owning the continent. It might not be profitable this year or this decade, but sooner or later they will be the entrenched company.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.